DOCSLIB.ORG

Conformal Equivalence Checker Formal Verification Technology for Fast and Accurate Bug Detection and Correction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conformal Equivalence Checker Formal Verification Technology for Fast and Accurate Bug Detection and Correction Conformal Equivalence Checker Formal verification technology for fast and accurate bug detection and correction Cadence® Conformal® Equivalence Checker (EC) makes it possible to verify and debug multimillion–gate designs without using test vectors. It offers the industry’s only complete equivalence checking solution for verifying SoC designs—from RTL to final LVS netlist (SPICE). Conformal EC enables designers to verify the widest variety of circuits, including complex arithmetic logic, datapaths, memories, and custom logic. Conformal EC Already proven in thousands of RT tapeouts, Conformal EC is the industry’s most widely supported independent equivalence-checking product. It is Synthesis • ogic equivalence checking production proven on more physical • Dual language support design closure products, advanced Place and Route • Semantic checks synthesis software, ASIC libraries, and • Structural checks IP than any other formal verification technology. Physical Synthesis Conformal EC is available in three configurations: the L offering delivers ECOs Conformal EC L core equivalence checking technology, the XL offering extends the L capabil- Final ayout Etends equivalence ities with automated checking of checking to datapath and S reference complex datapaths and equivalence Datapath Synthesis SPICE netlist Conformal EC XL checking of the final place-and-route netlist, and the GXL offering extends the L and XL capabilities with transistor Custom Circuit Design Etends equivalence checking circuit analysis for custom designs and to digital custom logic embedded memories. and memories Custom emory Design Conformal EC GXL Engineers can use the GXL offering with custom embedded memories, Figure 1: Conformal EC offers a complete solution, from RTL to final layout, arithmetic blocks, datapaths, standard to drive convergence on design goals and extended libraries, and all other custom and semi-custom digital circuit functions. Circuit styles supported include standard and complex Boolean functions, latches and registers, pass-gate, transmission-gate, tri-state switch logic, pre-charged logic cells, domino logic blocks, and dual-rail. Conformal Equivalence Checker Benefits • Exhaustively verifies multi-million–gate ASICs several times faster than traditional gate-level simulations • Decreases the risk of missing critical bugs with independent verification technology. • Enables faster, more accurate bug detection and correction throughout the entire design flow • Extends equivalence checking capability to complex datapaths and closes the RTL-to-layout verification gap (XL configuration) • Ensures RTL models perform the same functions as the corresponding transistor circuits implemented on silicon (GXL configuration) Features Conformal EC L Equivalence checking During a design’s development, it undergoes numerous iterations prior to Figure 2: Conformal EC has an easy-to-use GUI with extensive final layout, and each step in this process diagnosis and debugging capabilities has the potential to introduce logical bugs. Conformal EC L checks the functional • Graphical debugging via an integrated test vectors. It can handle a wide variety equivalence of different versions of a schematic viewer that shows logic of datapath structures required for design at these various stages and enables values for each error vector highperformance designs: designers to identify and correct errors • Full cross-highlighting between RTL • Automatic flat datapath module as soon as they are introduced, thereby model and circuit verification—Enables easy verification maintaining the initial design intent. without manually specifying boundaries • Automatic error candidate identification or architectures in the flattened netlist, Design flow independence with assigned and weighted automatically verifies merged operators, percentages Conformal EC L provides an independent compares circuitry that has gone through audit of the design process to eliminate the • Logic-cone pruning to focus debugging expression optimization, and automatically risks associated with sharing technologies on relevant information verifies multipliers with standard across design implementation and verifi- architectures and dynamic structures cation products. The tool includes technol- Conformal EC XL ogies developed independently from the • Advanced pipelining check design flow, such as production proven Datapath synthesis verification and diagnosis—Verifies proper implementation of pipelined designs HDL parsing, synthesis, mapping, optimi- Datapath optimization can create designs zation, and datapath algorithms. Using that are difficult to formally verify because • Carry-save verification capability—Allows Conformal EC L ensures that you will catch of complex arithmetic operations. verification of circuits containing carry-save the maximum number of design bugs. Designers have been relying on simulation transformations introduced during Integrated environment to verify datapath blocks, but simulation optimization for sequence of adders, runtimes are exceedingly long and the multipliers, and registers An intuitive GUI provides for setup and results can be incomplete. debugging, allowing you to work more Final circuit verification Conformal EC XL offers a first-of-its-kind productively and quickly pinpoint the Conformal EC XL is the only verification formal solution that exhaustively verifies cause of mismatches: product that enables a complete verifi cation complex datapath blocks without using solution from RTL to final layout, driving www.cadence.com 2 Conformal Equivalence Checker convergence on original design goals. It functionally compares a SPICE netlist created for LVS or extracted from GDS to the RTL Ealn raon or gate model. This process ensures that RTL CE Cn frn the circuit on silicon has the same intent n l as the initial design that was verified. Conformal EC Smart setup and diagnosis Conformal EC XL includes a set of intel- Conformal EC LVS ligent analysis commands to ease setup and diagnosis. For example, smart setup IP L investigates the current environment and automatically remedies common setup issues sometimes experienced by new Ga al n G users. In tandem, non-equivalent analysis can be invoked if non-equivalences are encountered, and presents concise root cause information for quicker debug. Figure 3: Conformal EC provides complete verification from RTL to SPICE Parallel processing functions and their ever-increasing comprehensive and trusted solutions for complexity. Conformal EC GXL provides equivalence checking, timing constraints For larger and complex designs, overall exhaustive logic verification and— since management, asynchronous clock-domain- verification time can be reduced with multiple no testbench is needed—the quality of crossing synchronization checks, functional licenses by running comparison and datapath results is not limited by availability of time ECO analysis and generation, and low-power analysis on many machines or cores simul- or resources to develop comprehensive design verification. taneously. LSF is also supported. tests. Conformal EC GXL generates The Conformal technology family memory-primative models for Verilog Conformal EC GXL consists of Conformal Constraint system simulation and complete logic Designer, Conformal Equivalence function verification of the transistor Custom logic abstraction Checker, Conformal Low Power, circuit design using abstraction and equiv- and Conformal ECO Designer. Conformal EC GXL analyzes digital transistor alence checking. circuits and abstracts an equivalent logical Verilog model. The underlying abstraction • Intuitive graphical interface to generate Platforms algorithms are more powerful than pattern- specific primitives • Linux (32-bit, 64-bit) based solutions. A Verilog gate logic model • Generated primitives are address, word, • Sun Solaris (64-bit) of the abstracted circuit can be used for: and column MUX-configurable • IBM AIX (64-bit) • Equivalence checking • All read-write, read-only, and write-only combinations can be generated • Fault grading—Preserves the circuit Language Support hierarchy and structure for maximum • Generated simulation models have • Verilog (1995, 2001, 2005) debugging efficiency the highest performance and contain • Emulation—Provides accurate built-in assertions for trapping illegal • SystemVerilog emulation models for actual memory use such as address collision • VHDL (87, 93) transistor-level circuits and simultaneous read-write • SPICE (traditional, LVS) • Simulation acceleration—Runs many Conformal Technology times faster than SPICE circuit simulation • EDIF To shorten overall design-cycle times and Memory verification minimize silicon re-spins, designers need • Liberty Traditional and symbolic simulation tools production-proven validation. Conformal • Mixed languages do not scale for verifying today’s memory verification technologies offer the most www.cadence.com 3 Conformal Equivalence Checker Cadence Services and Support • Cadence application engineers can answer your technical questions by telephone, email, or internet. They can also provide technical assistance and custom training. • Cadence-certified instructors teach more than 70 courses and bring their real-world experience into the classroom. • More than 25 Internet Learning Series (iLS) online courses allow you the flexibility of training at your own computer via the internet. • Cadence Online Support gives you 24×7 online access to a knowledgebase of the latest solutions, technical documentation, software downloads,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Placement and Routing in Computer Aided Design of Standard Cell Arrays by Exploiting the Structure of the Interconnection Graph
    325 Computer-Aided Design and Applications © 2008 CAD Solutions, LLC http://www.cadanda.com Placement and Routing in Computer Aided Design of Standard Cell Arrays by Exploiting the Structure of the Interconnection Graph Ioannis Fudos1, Xrysovalantis Kavousianos 1, Dimitrios Markouzis 1 and Yiorgos Tsiatouhas1 1University of Ioannina, {fudos,kabousia,dimmark,tsiatouhas}@cs.uoi.gr ABSTRACT Standard cell placement and routing is an important open problem in current CAD VLSI research. We present a novel approach to placement and routing in standard cell arrays inspired by geometric constraint usage in traditional CAD systems. Placement is performed by an algorithm that places the standard cells in a spiral topology around the center of the cell array driven by a DFS on the interconnection graph. We provide an improvement of this technique by first detecting dense graphs in the interconnection graph and then placing cells that belong to denser graphs closer to the center of the spiral. By doing so we reduce the wirelength required for routing. Routing is performed by a variation of the maze algorithm enhanced by a set of heuristics that have been tuned to maximize performance. Finally we present a visualization tool and an experimental performance evaluation of our approach. Keywords: CAD VLSI design, geometric constraints, graph algorithms. DOI: 10.3722/cadaps.2008.325-337 1. INTRODUCTION VLSI circuits become more and more complex increasingly fast. This denotes that the physical layout problem is becoming more and more cumbersome. From the early years of VLSI design, engineers have sought techniques for automated design targeted to a) decreasing the time to market and b) increasing the robustness of the final product.
    [Show full text]
  • "Routing-Directed Placement for the Triptych FPGA" (PDF)
    ACM/SIGDA Workshop on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays, Berkeley, February, 1992. Routing-directed Placement for the TRIPTYCH FPGA Elizabeth A. Walkup, Scott Hauck, Gaetano Borriello, Carl Ebeling Department of Computer Science and Engineering, FR-35 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 [Carter86], where the routing resources consume more Abstract than 90% of the chip area. Even so, the largest Xilinx Currently, FPGAs either divorce the issues of FPGA (3090) seldom achieves more than 50% logic placement and routing by providing logic and block utilization for random logic. A lack of interconnect as separate resources, or ignore the issue interconnect resources also leads to decreased of routing by targeting applications that use only performance as critical paths are forced into more nearest-neighbor communication. Triptych is a new circuitous routes. FPGA architecture that attempts to support efficient Domain-specific FPGAs like the Algotronix implementation of a wide range of circuits by blending CAL1024 (CAL) and the Concurrent Logic CFA6000 the logic and interconnect resources. This allows the (CFA) increase the chip area devoted to logic by physical structure of the logic array to more closely reducing routing to nearest-neighbor communication match the structure of logic functions, thereby [Algotronix91, Concurrent91]. The result is that these providing an efficient substrate (in terms of both area architectures are restricted to highly pipelined dataflow and speed) in which to implement these functions. applications, for which they are more efficient than Full utilization of this architecture requires an general-purpose FPGAs. Implementing circuits using integrated approach to the mapping process which these FPGAs requires close attention to routing during consists of covering, placement, and routing.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Needs in Computer-Aided Design: Logic and Physical Design and Analysis
    Research Needs in Computer-Aided Design: Logic and Physical Design and Analysis Logic synthesis and physical design, once considered separate topics, have grown together with the increasing need for tools which reach upward toward design at the system level and at the same time require links to detailed physical and electrical circuit characteristics. This list is a summary of important areas of research in computer-aided design seen by SRC members, ranging from behavioral-level design and synthesis to capacitance and inductance analysis. Note that research in CAD for analog/mixed signal is particularly encouraged, in addition to digital and hybrid system-on-chip design and analysis tools. Not included here are research needs in test and in verification, which are addressed in separate needs documents, and needs in circuit and system design itself, rather than tools research; these needs are assessed in the science area page for Integrated Circuits and Systems Sciences. Earlier needs lists with additional details are found in the "Top Ten" lists in synthesis and physical design developed by SRC task forces. System-Level Estimation and Partitioning System-level design tools require estimates to rapidly select a small number of potentially optimum candidates from a possibly enormous set of possible solutions. Models should consider power consumption, performance, die area (manufacturing cost), package size and cost, noise, test cost and other requirements and constraints. Partitioning of functional tasks between multiple hardware and software components, considering trade-offs between requirements and constraints, must be made using reasonably accurate models. Standard methods are also needed to estimate the performance of microprocessors and DSP cores to enable automated core selection.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of the Configured Flow
    mflowgen Sep 20, 2021 Contents 1 Quick Start 3 2 Reference: Graph-Building API7 2.1 Class Graph...............................................7 2.1.1 ADK-related..........................................7 2.1.2 Adding Steps..........................................7 2.1.3 Connecting Steps Together...................................8 2.1.4 Parameter System........................................8 2.1.5 Advanced Graph-Building...................................8 2.2 Class Step................................................9 2.3 Class Edge................................................ 10 3 User Guide 11 3.1 User Guide................................................ 11 3.2 Connecting Steps Together........................................ 11 3.2.1 Automatic Connection by Name................................ 11 3.2.2 Explicit Connections...................................... 13 3.3 Instantiating a Step Multiple Times................................... 14 3.4 Sweeping Large Design Spaces..................................... 15 3.4.1 More Details.......................................... 17 3.5 ADK Paths................................................ 19 3.6 Assertions................................................ 20 3.6.1 The File Class and Tool Class................................ 21 3.6.2 Adding Assertions When Constructing Your Graph...................... 21 3.6.3 Escaping Special Characters.................................. 21 3.6.4 Multiline Assertions...................................... 21 3.6.5 Defining Python Helper Functions..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Magic: an Industrial-Strength Logic Optimization, Technology Mapping, and Formal Verification Tool
    Magic: An Industrial-Strength Logic Optimization, Technology Mapping, and Formal Verification Tool Alan Mishchenko Niklas Een Robert Brayton Stephen Jang Maciej Ciesielski Thomas Daniel Department of EECS LogicMill Technology Abound Logic University of California, Berkeley San Jose, CA / Amherst, MA Santa Clara, CA {alanmi, een, brayton}@eecs.berkeley.edu {sjang, mciesielski}@logic-mill.com [email protected] ABSTRACT The present paper outlines the result of integrating ABC into one commercial flow and shows the results produced. This paper presents an industrial-strength CAD system for logic We named the result of this integration “Magic” to distinguish it optimization, technology mapping, and formal verification of from ABC as a public-domain system. The two are closely related synchronous designs. The new system, Magic, is based on the but not the same: ABC is a store-house of implementations called code of ABC that has been improved by adding industrial application packages, most of which are experimental, requirements. Distinctive features include: global-view incomplete, or have known bugs, while Magic integrates and optimizations for area and delay, scalable sequential synthesis, the extends only those features that create a robust optimization flow. use of white-boxes for instances that should not be mapped, and a Magic features an all-new design database developed within built-in formal verification framework to run combinational and ABC to meet industrial requirements. The database was developed sequential equivalence checking. Comparison against a reference from scratch, based on our experience gained while applying ABC industrial flow shows that Magic is capable of reducing both area to industrial designs.
    [Show full text]
  • Application-Specific Integrated Circuits
    Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICS) S. K. Tewksbury Microelectronic Systems Research Center Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown, WV 26506 (304)293-6371 May 15, 1996 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The Primary Steps of VLSI ASIC Design 3 3 The Increasing Impact of Interconnection Delays on Design 5 4 General Transistor Level Design of CMOS Circuits 6 5 ASIC Technologies 8 5.1 Full Custom Design ......................................... 8 5.2 Standard Cell ASIC Technology ................................... 9 5.3 Gate Array ASIC Technology .................................... 10 5.4 Sea-of-Gates ASIC Technology ................................... 10 5.5 CMOS Circuits using Megacell Elements .............................. 10 5.6 Field Programmable Gate Arrays: Evolving to an ASIC Technology .............. 11 6 Interconnection Performance Modeling 12 7 Clock Distribution 14 8 Power Distribution 15 9 Analog and Mixed-Signal ASICs 16 10 Summary 16 1 Introduction Today’s VLSI CMOS technologies can place and interconnect several million transistors (representing over a million gates) on a single integrated circuit (IC) approximately 1 cm square. Provided with such a vast number of gates, a digital system designer can implement very sophisticated and complex system functions (including full systems) on a single IC. However, ecient design (including optimized performance) of such functions using all these gates is a complex puzzle of immense complexity. If this technology were to have been provided to the world overnight, it is doubtful that designers could in fact make use of this vast amount of logic on an IC. 1 Figure 1: Photomicrograph of the SHARC digital signal processor of Analog Devices, Inc., provided for this chapter by Douglas Garde, Analog Devices, Inc., Norwood, MA.
    [Show full text]
  • Verilog HDL 1
    chapter 1.fm Page 3 Friday, January 24, 2003 1:44 PM Overview of Digital Design with Verilog HDL 1 1.1 Evolution of Computer-Aided Digital Design Digital circuit design has evolved rapidly over the last 25 years. The earliest digital circuits were designed with vacuum tubes and transistors. Integrated circuits were then invented where logic gates were placed on a single chip. The first integrated circuit (IC) chips were SSI (Small Scale Integration) chips where the gate count was very small. As technologies became sophisticated, designers were able to place circuits with hundreds of gates on a chip. These chips were called MSI (Medium Scale Integration) chips. With the advent of LSI (Large Scale Integration), designers could put thousands of gates on a single chip. At this point, design processes started getting very complicated, and designers felt the need to automate these processes. Electronic Design Automation (EDA)1 techniques began to evolve. Chip designers began to use circuit and logic simulation techniques to verify the functionality of building blocks of the order of about 100 transistors. The circuits were still tested on the breadboard, and the layout was done on paper or by hand on a graphic computer terminal. With the advent of VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) technology, designers could design single chips with more than 100,000 transistors. Because of the complexity of these circuits, it was not possible to verify these circuits on a breadboard. Computer- aided techniques became critical for verification and design of VLSI digital circuits. Computer programs to do automatic placement and routing of circuit layouts also became popular.
    [Show full text]
  • Verilog Synthesis and Formal Verification with Yosys Clifford Wolf
    Verilog Synthesis and Formal Verification with Yosys Clifford Wolf Easterhegg 2016 Overview A) Quick introduction to HDLs, digital design flows, ... B) Verilog HDL Synthesis with Yosys 1. OSS iCE40 FPGA Synthesis flow 2. Xilinx Verilog-to-Netlist Synthesis with Yosys 3. OSS Silego GreenPAK4 Synthesis flow 4. Synthesis to simple Verilog or BLIF files 5. ASIC Synthesis and custom flows C) Formal Verification Flows with Yosys 1. Property checking with build-in SAT solver 2. Property checking with ABC using miter circuits 3. Property checking with yosys-smtbmc and SMT solvers 4. Formal and/or structural equivalence checking Quick Introduction ● What is Verilog? What are HDLs? ● What are HDL synthesis flows? ● What are verification, simulation, and formal verification? ● What FOSS tools exist for working with Verilog designs? ● How to use Yosys? Where is the documentation? What is Verilog? What are HDLs? ● Hardware Description Languages (HDLs) are computer languages that describe digital circuits. ● The two most important HDLs are VHDL and Verilog / SystemVerilog. (SystemVerilog is Verilog with a lot of additional features added to the language.) ● Originally HDLs where only used for testing and documentation. But nowadays HDLs are also used as design entry (instead of e.g. drawing schematics). ● Converting HDL code to a circuit is called HDL Synthesis. Simple Verilog Example module example000 ( input clk, output [4:0] gray_counter ); localparam PRESCALER = 100; reg [$clog2(PRESCALER)-1:0] fast_counter = 0; reg [4:0] slow_counter = 0; always @(posedge clk) begin if (fast_counter == PRESCALER) begin fast_counter <= 0; slow_counter <= slow_counter + 1; end else begin fast_counter <= fast_counter + 1; end end assign gray_counter = slow_counter ^ (slow_counter >> 1); endmodule Simple Verilog Example .
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Approach to IP Protection and Trojan Prevention: Split Manufacturing for 3D Ics and Obfuscation of Vertical Interconnects
    c 2019 IEEE. This is the author’s version of the work. It is posted here for personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record is published in IEEE TETC, DOI 10.1109/TETC.2019.2933572 A Modern Approach to IP Protection and Trojan Prevention: Split Manufacturing for 3D ICs and Obfuscation of Vertical Interconnects Satwik Patnaik, Student Member, IEEE, Mohammed Ashraf, Ozgur Sinanoglu, Senior Member, IEEE, and Johann Knechtel, Member, IEEE Abstract—Split manufacturing (SM) and layout camouflaging (LC) are two promising techniques to obscure integrated circuits (ICs) from malicious entities during and after manufacturing. While both techniques enable protecting the intellectual property (IP) of ICs, SM can further mitigate the insertion of hardware Trojans (HTs). In this paper, we strive for the “best of both worlds,” that is we seek to combine the individual strengths of SM and LC. By jointly extending SM and LC techniques toward 3D integration, an up-and-coming paradigm based on stacking and interconnecting of multiple chips, we establish a modern approach to hardware security. Toward that end, we develop a security-driven CAD and manufacturing flow for 3D ICs in two variations, one for IP protection and one for HT prevention. Essential concepts of that flow are (i) “3D splitting” of the netlist to protect, (ii) obfuscation of the vertical interconnects (i.e., the wiring between stacked chips), and (iii) for HT prevention, a security-driven synthesis stage. We conduct comprehensive experiments on DRC-clean layouts of multi-million-gate DARPA and OpenCores designs (and others). Strengthened by extensive security analysis for both IP protection and HT prevention, we argue that entering the third dimension is eminent for effective and efficient hardware security.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Formal Equivalence Checking and Design Debugging
    FORMAL EQUIVALENCE CHECKING AND DESIGN DEBUGGING PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Shi-Yu Huang | 229 pages | 30 Jun 1998 | Springer | 9780792381846 | English | Dordrecht, Netherlands Formal Equivalence Checking and Design Debugging PDF Book Although the syntax of the assertions presents a learning curve, they are easier to handle than mathematical expressions. Ghosh, M. The second part of the book gives a thorough survey of previous and recent literature on design error diagnosis and design error correction. To get access to this content you need the following product:. Do not get confused between un-mapped and non-equivalent reports. How is equivalence checking related to other formal approaches? If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Then, formal logic debugging methods are evaluated using industrial buggy circuits. Importance of LEC Design passes through various steps like synthesis, place and route, sign- offs, ECOs engineering change orders , and numerous optimizations before it reaches production. Does it take a lot of work to get results from formal tools? The second part of the book gives a thorough survey of previous and recent literature on design error diagnosis and design error correction. Either way, the changes to the design must be made carefully so that any proofs obtained are also valid for the original design. Formal verification is the use of mathematical analysis to prove or disprove the correctness of a design with respect to a set of assertions specifying intended design behavior. You have deactivated JavaScript in your browser settings. This approach automatically inserts faults bugs into the formal model and checks to see whether any assertions detect them.
    [Show full text]
  • Routing Architectures for Hierarchical Field Programmable Gate Arrays
    Routing Architectures for Hierarchical Field Programmable Gate Arrays Aditya A. Aggarwal and David M. Lewis University of Toronto Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Toronto, Ontario, Canada Abstract architecture to that of a symmetrical FPGA, and holding all other features constant, we hope to clarify the impact of This paper evaluates an architecture that implements a HFPGA architecture in isolation. hierarchical routing structure for FPGAs, called a hierarch- ical FPGA (HFPGA). A set of new tools has been used to The remainder of this paper studies the effect of rout- place and route several circuits on this architecture, with ing architectures in HFPGAs as an independent architec- the goal of comparing the cost of HFPGAs to conventional tural feature. It first defines an architecture for HFPGAs symmetrical FPGAs. The results show that HFF'GAs can with partially populated switch pattems. Experiments are implement circuits with fewer routing switches, and fewer then presented comparing the number of routing switches switches in total, compared to symmetrical FGPAs, required to the number required by a symmetrical FPGA. although they have the potential disadvantage that they Results for the total number of switches and tracks are also may require more logic blocks due to coarser granularity. given. 1. Introduction 2. Architecture and Area Models for HPFGAs Field programmable gate array architecture has been Figs. l(a) and I@) illustrate the components in a the subject of several studies that attempt to evaluate vari- HFPGA. An HFPGA consists of two types of primitive ous logic blocks and routing architectures, with the goals blocks, or level-0 blocks: logic blocks and U0 blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Place and Route for Pipeline Reconfigurable Architectures
    Efficient Place and Route for Pipeline Reconfigurable Architectures Srihari Cadambi*and Seth Copen Goldsteint Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Abstract scheme for a class of reconfigurable architectures that exhibit pipeline reconfiguration. The target pipeline In this paper, we present a fast and eficient compi- reconfigurable architecture is represented by a sim- lation methodology for pipeline reconfigurable architec- ple VLIW-style model with a list of architectural con- tures. Our compiler back-end is much faster than con- straints. We heuristically represent all constraints by a ventional CAD tools, and fairly eficient. We repre- single graph parameter, the routing path length (RPL) sent pipeline reconfigurable architectures by a general- of the graph, which we then attempt to minimize. Our ized VLI W-like model. The complex architectural con- compilation scheme is a combination of high-level syn- straints are effectively expressed in terms of a single thesis heuristics and a fast, deterministic place-and- graph parameter: the routing path length (RPL). Com- route algorithm made possible by a compiler-friendly piling to our model using RPL, we demonstrate fast architecture. The scheme may be used to design a compilation times and show speedups of between lox compiler for any pipeline reconfigurable architecture, and 200x on a pipeline reconfigurable architecture when as well as any architecture that may be represented by compared to an UltraSparc-II. our model. It is very fast and fairly efficient. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the concept of pipeline reconfigura- 1. Introduction tion and its benefits.
    [Show full text]