Ebook Download Formal Equivalence Checking and Design Debugging
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FORMAL EQUIVALENCE CHECKING AND DESIGN DEBUGGING PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Shi-Yu Huang | 229 pages | 30 Jun 1998 | Springer | 9780792381846 | English | Dordrecht, Netherlands Formal Equivalence Checking and Design Debugging PDF Book Although the syntax of the assertions presents a learning curve, they are easier to handle than mathematical expressions. Ghosh, M. The second part of the book gives a thorough survey of previous and recent literature on design error diagnosis and design error correction. To get access to this content you need the following product:. Do not get confused between un-mapped and non-equivalent reports. How is equivalence checking related to other formal approaches? If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Then, formal logic debugging methods are evaluated using industrial buggy circuits. Importance of LEC Design passes through various steps like synthesis, place and route, sign- offs, ECOs engineering change orders , and numerous optimizations before it reaches production. Does it take a lot of work to get results from formal tools? The second part of the book gives a thorough survey of previous and recent literature on design error diagnosis and design error correction. Either way, the changes to the design must be made carefully so that any proofs obtained are also valid for the original design. Formal verification is the use of mathematical analysis to prove or disprove the correctness of a design with respect to a set of assertions specifying intended design behavior. You have deactivated JavaScript in your browser settings. This approach automatically inserts faults bugs into the formal model and checks to see whether any assertions detect them. This paper gives an introduction of logical equivalence check, flow setup, steps to debug it, and solutions to fix LEC. Partner with us Partner with us. Shipping costs:, Versandfertig in Tagen, AT. Comparison examines the key points to determine if they are equivalent or non-equivalent. Conversely, the no-name-mapping method is useful when the Conformal tool must map designs with completely different names. It is quite easy for the designers to use it while developing RTL, as it does not require any other testbench environment. Is it possible to know when enough assertions have been written? IO and multiprotocol processing in highly demanding embedded architectures. How are assertions specified? Presentation Slides. Some features of the site may not work correctly. Lahiri , R. This part also provides an in-depth analysis of the algorithms used in two logic debugging software programs, ErrorTracer and AutoFix, developed by the authors. We will explore a test case to see what happens if LEC fails — how to pinpoint the problem and what steps to take for resolving the same. These are the areas where equivalence checking is commonly used. The idea behind Magellan is to find bugs that are buried deep within a pipeline and thus would take many cycles to trigger using just simulation. If you wish to download a copy of this white paper, click here. Algorithm for Verifying Retimed Circuits. Is it hard to write assertions for complex protocols? For finding the missing cell, we have to back trace this net in the previously LEC passed database and check actual connections. It may be possible that due to one broken connection, a higher number of cell names are reported in the "non-equivalent. In the un-mapped report we only see the floating nets of the undriven input pins, whereas in the non- equivalent report we see all the cells which are fanouts of this missing cell. Formal Equivalence Checking and Design Debugging Writer However, the underlying sequential equivalence checking technology utilized in EC-FPGA, which makes use of the OneSpin formal property checking engines, eliminates many of the design restrictions necessary with other solutions, as follows:. Lahiri and R. For example, an assertion may check that an acknowledgement signal follows a request after no more than ten clock cycles. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this website can be obtained on OneSpin's Privacy Policy. Maeda, T. Any needed assertions are generated by the app internally from the design RTL implementation and possibly additional files such as connectivity spreadsheets or power-intent specifications. Therefore, formal verification plays a very important role by saving simulation run time as the well the huge resource requirements of those extended simulations. Table of Contents. Skip to main content Skip to table of contents. There are four possible results:. The following table shows a combination that can be used for comparison of the Initial Design with the Target Design. This book is timely for either the designer seeking to better understand the mechanics of equivalence checking or for the CAD researcher who wishes to investigate well-motivated research problems such as equivalence checking of retimed designs or error diagnosis in sequential circuits. It is possible to integrate these two metrics into a single coverage view. For the largest FPGA, debugging a synthesis mismatch, some of the hardest systematic errors to discover, can take days through the traditional method of prototyping on the actual final device. Formal verification tools work equally well on both technologies and have been adopted on many FPGA projects. Report analysis shows that verification has failed. Model-based mutation coverage reports the portions of the design in which a bug would not be detected by any existing assertion. The concepts are very similar. Is formal verification needed for FPGAs? SVA is especially popular because most design and verification engineers are trained on SystemVerilog and comfortable using it. Figure 4. Imoto, R. Common examples include reducing the size of on-chip memories, the width of counters, and the depth of FIFOs and buffers. Verification leads need to look at the combined coverage metrics from all tools to assess verification progress and determine what remains to be done. Unfortunately, the terminology used across the industry is not entirely consistent. This removes the burden of tool qualification from users, accelerating their own certification process. Formal Equivalence Checking and Design Debugging Reviews One way to run formal analysis more efficiently on a large or complex design is to replace parts of the design with simpler, more abstract structure that are easier to analyze. For Formal Verification, you can refer the below 2 posts of my blog. In-circuit emulation ICE and prototypes built using FPGAs are typically designed to be plugged into the end system in lieu of the actual chip under design. In order to ensure the overall system integrity of HVAC system, there are three different approaches to consider: 1. Equivalence checking is one of the two critical elements of this methodological revolution. The first part of the book reviews the des… More Formal Equivalence Checking EC has become a standard part of the ASIC development flow, replacing almost all gate level simulation with a rigorous consistency check between pre- and post-synthesized code. SoC-level formal verification As formal verification has yet to arrive in a form that can test the entire behavior of an SoC, it needs to be used as part of a wider verification strategy that will include simulation and, most likely for large designs, emulation. This can be very helpful if the simulation team is having a hard time trying to figure out how to exercise a particular part of the design. Is there any book or course for understanding formal property verification? How is formal verification different from simulation? This makes it easier for designers or verification engineers to determine which assertions must be added for full coverage. Clarke, O. Sequential equivalence checking, in its purest form, treats two designs as black boxes in which the input and outputs must match but the internal state can be entirely different. At this point you may also object to the use of cookies and adjust the browser settings accordingly. Synopsys Design Constraints. How are assertions specified? At the full-chip level, there are some types of assertions that can be proven even for the largest designs. In fact, what is important, as any enginering job, is the result, and here the result is a proof that the design complies to the requirements. Formal Equivalence Checking and Design Debugging. Real-Time Locating Systems RTLS are used to identify and track the location of objects or people in real time, usually within a building or other contained area. Simulation is inherently probabilistic; the chances of exercising every scenario that would reveal a design bug are small. It is common to divide formal verification into equivalence checking and property checking. These violations are often called counter-examples since they represent a way in which the implementation does not match the specification of intended behavior. It supports all sequential synthesis optimizations performed in FPGA design flows. Model-based mutation coverage reports the portions of the design in which a bug would not be detected by any existing assertion. Balakrishnan, A. Chapter number Chapter Is there a way to get a unified view of verification progress? AMD has recently made up significant ground in the desktop space over the last 12 quarters the typical timeframe to develop a new chip , making it clear that Intel needed to evolve. As it targets more specific areas, there is greater confidence in its ability and capacity to catch related bugs — a confidence that has built rapidly following successful deployments of these modules. Whether this is sufficient depends upon the design; there are techniques to calculate the depth at which a bounded proof is tantamount to a full proof. Price development SVA is the assertions subset of the System Verilog language. To deliver maximum speed, FPGA synthesis tools perform a wide variety of optimizations that change the internal structure of the design but should not affect functionality.