Science Park Development Plan Document Preferred Option

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Science Park Development Plan Document Preferred Option CHARNWOOD 2021 Local Development Framework for Charnwood SCIENCE PARK DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT PREFERRED OPTION SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL REPORT February 2006 The Council provides a written and audio tape translation facility for translation of all of it publications. To obtain a Council document in an alternative language please telephone 01509 634560. Punjabi Bengali Cantonese Gujarati Hindi Kurdish If you require a copy of this document in Braille, audio tape or large print please telephone 01509 634603. Contents Science Park Development Plan Document Preferred Option Sustainability Appraisal Report February 2006 CONTENTS 1. Summary and outcomes 1 1.1 Non-technical summary 1 1.2 A Statement of the likely significant effects of the plan 3 1.3 Statement on the difference the process has made 6 1.4 How to comment on the report 9 2. Appraisal Methodology 10 2.1 Approach adopted to the SA 10 2.2 When was the Sustainability Appraisal carried out 11 2.3 Who carried out the Sustainability Appraisal 11 2.4 Who was consulted, when and how 11 2.5 Difficulties encountered in compiling information or carrying out the assessment 12 3. Background 12 3.1 Purpose of the SA and the SA Report 12 3.2 Plan objectives and outline of contents 12 3.3 Compliance with the SEA Directive/Regulations 12 4. Sustainability objectives, baseline and context 13 4.1 Links to other strategies, plans and programmes and sustainability objectives 13 4.2 Description of the social, environmental and economic baseline characteristics and the predicted future baseline 17 4.3 Main Social, environmental and economic issues and problems identified 19 4.4 Difficulties in collecting data and limitations of the data 19 4.5 The SA framework, including objectives, targets and indicators 20 5. Plan issues and options 28 5.1 Main strategic options considered and how they were identified 28 5.2 Comparison of the social, environmental and economic effects of the options 28 5.3 How social, environmental and economic issues were considered in choosing the preferred option 39 5.4 Other Options Considered, and why these were rejected 39 5.5 Any Proposed mitigation measures 40 6. Plan policies 40 6.1 Significant social, environmental and economic effects of the preferred policies 40 6.2 How social, environmental and economic problems were considered in developing policies and proposals 51 6.3 Proposed mitigation measures 51 6.4 Uncertainties and risks 51 7. Implementation 52 7.1 Links to other tiers of plans and programmes and the project level (environmental impact assessment, design guidance etc) 52 7.2 Proposals for monitoring 52 Contents Science Park Development Plan Document Preferred Option Sustainability Appraisal Report February 2006 SCIENCE PARK DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT PREFERRED OPTION SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL REPORT 1 Summary and outcomes 1.1 Non-technical summary Appraisal Methodology 1.1.1 A sustainability appraisal is a way of ensuring the potential economic, social and environmental effects of the proposed Science Park DPD are identified and measures are taken to remedy any detrimental effects. 1.1.2 This Sustainability Appraisal is undertaken in line with the guidelines set out in the Consultation Draft ‘Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development Frameworks’ (ODPM, 2004). It also includes an environmental report as required by the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive (2001/42/EC) relating to the environmental assessment of plans. Using the method set out in the Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report the site options and policy of the Science Park DPD have been assessed against the 27 sustainability objectives which comprise of a range of environmental, material assets (natural resources), social and environmental topics. The sustainability objectives are set out in Table 1. This assessment took place between July and November 2005. This was at the same time as the Science Park DPD policy was being formed so that the assessment could influence the forming of the policy. The Planning Policy team carried out the assessment. Background 1.1.3 The sustainability appraisal is one way of ensuring that the Science Park DPD contributes to the aim of sustainable development, which is central to the reformed planning system. Sustainable development is about the integration of economic, social and environmental considerations in planning new growth and protecting assets. 1.1.4 The Science Park DPD is one of the documents that will form part of Charnwood’s Local Development Framework. It will identify land for the provision of a second Science Park in Loughborough. Where appropriate it will also consider the needs of Loughborough University for additional educational and student accommodation space. The Science Park DPD has been guided by the Core Strategy DPD, which is being produced, to the same timescale. Sustainability Objectives, Baseline and Context 1.1.5 The Sustainability Appraisal Framework is the matrix against which all options and policies will be assessed. It also includes targets and indicators for each objective so that progress can be measured to ensure that the DPD continues to positively influence the sustainability objectives. Further details are set out in Table 6 of the Main Report. The Framework was drawn up by taking account of: Relevant policy documents and their key objectives, targets and indicators at the national, regional and local level on economic, social and environmental subjects Social, environmental and economic baseline characteristics of the Borough Main social, environmental and economic issues and problems identified 1 Science Park Development Plan Document Preferred Option Sustainability Appraisal Report - February 2006 Table 1: Sustainability Objectives Environmental Objectives Social Objectives To maintain and enhance biodiversity, flora and fauna To increase the population’s access to a full range of To maintain and enhance landscape and townscape public, private, community and voluntary services character To increase access to the countryside, public open To protect and improve surface and groundwater spaces and semi urban environments (eg parks) quality To promote a strong community where people feel To minimise water consumption they have a say in the future To improve air quality To reduce crime, anti social behaviour and increase To conserve soil resources and quality community safety To reduce contributions to climate change To increase the population’s access and opportunity To reduce vulnerability to climate change to participate in culture, media and sport in To conserve and enhance the historic and cultural Charnwood environment To ensure that the housing stock meets the housing needs of all sections of the community To reduce poverty and social exclusion To increase learning, skills and employability for all sectors of the community To increase the vibrancy and viability of settlements To increase sustainable design and construction To increase healthy life styles Material Assets Objectives Economic Objectives To increase the re-use of previously developed land To encourage a sustainable economy and buildings To increase efficient patterns of movement to To minimise the extraction of new and increase the support a sustainable economy re-use of recycled minerals and aggregates resources To reduce disparities in economic performance To manage waste in accordance with the waste hierarchy in all sectors (i.e. household, commercial and industrial) To minimise the use of energy and optimise the use of renewable resources Plan Issues and Options 1.1.6 The Council published an ‘Issues and Options’ Paper on the Core Strategy and Science Park in June 2005 for consultation with key stakeholders. This invited comments on 5 possible sites for the science park. The location and size of the science park is guided by the Structure Plan which indicates that a substantial science park of up to 50 hectares should be found in Loughborough close to the university. The result of the consultation was to add an extra site for the Council to consider on the southern edge of Loughborough. 1.1.7 Before carrying out the sustainability appraisal of the site options, 2 of the site options were considered unsuitable to take forward. Brownfield sites in Loughborough have not been taken forward as there is not a large enough site or group of sites likely to be available. Land at Sileby has not been taken forward as no detailed information was given for the site and it is likely to score poorly in terms of its location. 1.1.8 So, the Sustainability Appraisal of sites compares 4 options. The reasons for choosing the preferred site option are set out below. Further details are set out in Section 5 of the Main Report. Option 1: Land West of Loughborough, South of the A512 Presents the best option for the development of a Science Park. The appraisal indicates that there are potential environmental effects but the site has advantages that will be attractive in terms of business investment: 2 areas of ancient woodland fall within the site; 2 Science Park Development Plan Document Preferred Option Sustainability Appraisal Report - February 2006 Part of the site falls within the northernmost edge of the sensitive landscape of the Charnwood Forest and the National Forest but the landscape in this area is already affected by existing urban influences; Falls within Green Wedge but there is scope to remodel this and retain an effective area of separation; The character of the area gives the opportunity to secure a high quality development, reflecting its location on the edge of Charnwood Forest and the National Forest; Close to the two largest urban settlements, Loughborough and Shepshed Located in close proximity to the University where there is scope for the involvement of the University in the development of the Science Park as it has a direct interest in it; Excellent access to the motorway via Junction 23 of the M1; High frequency bus service between Loughborough and Shepshed gives significant scope to reduce car use.
Recommended publications
  • From Science Parks to Innovation Districts
    From Science Parks to Innovation Districts Research Facility Development in Legacy Cities on the Northeast Corridor Working Paper 2015/008 August 2015 Eugenie L. Birch Lawrence C. Nussdorf Professor of Urban Research Department of City and Regional Planning School of Design Co-Director, Penn Institute for Urban Research University of Pennsylvania Contact Information: [email protected] Understanding our cities…. Understanding our world From Science Parks to Innovation Districts 2 Introduction Research and development (R&D) drives advanced economies worldwide. It is this that provides the foundation for the new knowledge, products, and processes that, in turn, become new industries, create jobs and serve as the source of economic growth. Key areas for R&D are in what is called the knowledge and technology industries (KTI) that consist of high technology manufacturing (e.g. aircraft, spacecraft, pharmaceuticals) and knowledge-intensive services (commercial business, financial and communication services). KTI, which account f or 27% of the worldwide Gross Domestic Product (GDP), are extremely important to the United States, in particular, representing 40% of the U.S. GDP. In fact, the U.S is the world’s largest KTI producer – contributing 27% of the total HT manufacturing and 32% of the KI services.1 In order to grow and maintain these positions, the United States, like its peers in Europe and Asia who are also large contributors, has built an extensive R&D infrastructure composed of three strong players: the private sector, the public sector and universities. In terms of expenditures and numbers of employees, the private sector dominates the R&D enterprise, but the university sector, largely funded by the US government, is also an important component both directly and indirectly.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Donation Program
    Body Donation Program The School of Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide operates a central mortuary facility on behalf of the Universities in South Australia for the acceptance of all bodies donated to science and controls the transfer of anatomical resources to licensed schools of anatomy within the State and Commonwealth in support of teaching, training, scientific studies and research. School of Medical Sciences Body Donation Program 2 Donating your body to science is one of the greatest Q1: What is the relevant State legislation that gifts one can give to make a lasting contribution to the allows for a person to donate their body to education and training of our current & future health science? professionals and to advance science through research. Historically, South Australians have been most generous In South Australia, the Transplantation and Anatomy in their support of our Body Donation Program and we Act, 1983*, Part V, allows members of the public to consistently have one of the highest donation rates per unconditionally donate their body for use in teaching, training, scientific studies and research, in any licensed capita in Australasia. institution in the Commonwealth. The opportunity to be able to dissect the human body is * Copies of the Transplantation and Anatomy Act, 1983 a privilege not available in many parts of the world and can be obtained from the internet at: this is reflected through the quality of our graduates and the world class training and research conducted within http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au the Universities in South Australia. Q2: How do I register my intention to donate my This leaflet will provide you and your family with detailed body to science? answers to the most common questions we are asked about the donation of one’s body to science.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Top Ranking Report Annual Report Architectural Record ENR VMSD Top 300 Architecture Top 150 Global Top Retail Design Firms: Design Firms: Firms of 2014: # #1 Firm Overall #1 Architecture Firm #1 Firm Overall Building Design ENR Interior Design Message from the Board of Directors 2014 World Top 500 Design Firms: Top 100 Giants: Architecture 100 Most #1 Architecture Firm #1 Architecture Firm Admired Firms: Gensler is1 a leader among the #1 in Corporate Office As we celebrate our 50th anniversary, we world’s architecture and design #1 US Firm #1 in Retail #4 Global Firm #1 in Transportation firms. Here’s how we ranked in #1 in Government look forward to more record-setting years, our industry in 2014. #1 in Cultural thanks to our great client relationships and extraordinary people around the world. Financial Report Our financial performance and recognition throughout the We’re entering our 50th year stronger than ever. Financially strong and debt-free, we contributed industry are indications of the breadth of our practice, our global In 2014, our global growth continued apace $38.5 million in deferred compensation to our reach, and the long-standing trust of our clients. with our clients as they entrusted us with new employees through our ESOP, profit-sharing, and challenges and led us to new locations. Our international retirement plans. We made strategic expanded Gensler team of 4,700+ professionals investments in our research and professional We’ve broadened our services to 27 now work from 46 different offices. With their development programs, along with upgrades to practice areas, with total revenues help, we completed projects in 72 countries and our design-and-delivery platform and the tools for the year setting a new record $ increased our revenues to $915 million—a record and technology to support it.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan-And-Manage-A-Science-Park-In
    Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 1 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 2 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 1 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 2 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 3 SUMMARY PAGE 4 INTRODUCTION PAGE 11 CHAPTER I SCIENCE PARK PLAYERS AND PARTNERS 1. The stakeholders 13 2. The role of the State 15 3. Strategies to mobilize the private sector 17 4. Enhancing the innovation environment 20 PAGE 25 CHAPTER II STRATEGIC POSITIONING OF SCIENCE PARKS 1. The positioning of the science park 28 2. Consensus building in positioning strategies 35 3. Sustainability of the science park 39 4. Project development and opportunities 44 PAGE 51 CHAPTER III DEVELOPMENT OF A SCIENCE PARK OR TECHNOPOLE AND URBAN INTEGRATION 1. The science park development context 55 2. The programming chart and the implementation of inputs: facilities, land and services 58 3. Conditions for integrating a science park into the host metropolis 63 PAGE 66 CHAPTER IV FINANCING SCIENCE PARK ACTIVITIES 1. Introduction 68 2. The financial environment 70 3. The funding options 79 4. Key points 89 PAGE 90 CHAPTER V SUPPORT FOR FIRMS AND PROJECTS Part A: Individual services 1. The role of coaching and mentoring in supporting innovative projects 93 2. Strategic marketing and operational positioning 98 3. Strategic alliance support 102 4. Financial assistance and relations with investors 105 Part B: Collective services 1. Marketing and communication for innovative projects 109 2. Stimulate and support networking and development of collaborative projects 112 3. Business Development (BizDev) actions 116 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Regiostars Awards 2009
    RegioStars Awards 2009 Presentation of the finalists Brussels, 16th February 2009 Foreword Innovation and the application of innovative practices enable Europe’s businesses to stay ahead in a globalised economic en- vironment. This message is more relevant than ever. Innovating regions and the good practice they generate and share are key to improving Europe’s competitiveness, to increasing growth and promoting jobs. It is in this context that we organise RegioStars, DG Regional Policy’s annual awards for innovative projects supported through EU Cohesion Policy. These awards aim to identify and publicise the good regional innovative projects, across different categories, in order to promote the exchange of good practices across Europe. RegioStars 2009 has seen applications from many project promoters and regions from 18 RegioStars Awards EU Member States and third country partners in Interreg programmes. This year’s award categories were; “Research, Technological Development and Innovation”, “Adaptation to or mitigation of climate change” and “Radio or television spot or programme that highlights the contribution of Cohesion Policy”. 20 applications in the two categories linked to policy themes were short listed as finalists by the Jury and this booklet contains summary descriptions of these projects. These can also be accessed on the Inforegio website (http://ec.europa.eu/in- 2009 foregio). RegioStars is part of the Regions for Economic Change initiative, which has amongst its objectives the sharing of good practice. Indeed it is essential that we work together, share our experiences and learn from them. RegioStars is a perfect example of how regions, no matter what their size or location, can learn from each other.
    [Show full text]
  • September 19, 2014
    RESULTS - Sorted by YES Pima County Bond Advisory Committee Member Preferences for $650 Million Bond Package 9.19.14 Dept ID Project Names Total # Yes PR 18 El Pueblo Center Improvements 18 CD 2 Neighborhood Reinvestment Program 18 PR 93 Yaqui Park Community Center 17 FM 48 Joyner-Green Valley Library Expansion 17 PR 20 Reid Park Improvements (Tier 2) 17 FC 58 Santa Cruz River: Rillito and Canada del Oro Confluence 17 FM 99 Drexel Heights Sheriff District Station 16 FM 9 Green Valley Government Center Parking & Access Improvements 16 FM 110 Elections Equipment 16 FM 35 Southwest Branch Library (formally West Valencia) 16 FM 51 Flowing Wells Branch Library Expansion 16 N 15 Mission San Xavier East Tower & Façade Restoration 16 CD 1 Affordable Housing Program 16 PR 137 Canoa Preserve Park (formally BAJA Seniors Sports Complex ) (Tier 1) 16 FM 1 Pima County One Stop Career Center 16 PR 217 James D. Kriegh Park Upgrades (Tier 1) 15 FC 16 South 7th Avenue Between West 28th and 20th Streets Drainage 15 FM 34 Downtown Legal Services Building Asbestos Abatement & Fire Sprinklers 15 FM 45 Sahuarita Branch Library 15 Cemetery Wash Drainage Improvements 15 FM 77 County Fairgrounds Building & Infrastructure Improvements 15 PR 19 Freedom Center Expansion and Pool Improvements (Tier 2) 15 PR 35 City of Tucson Sports Fields & Lighting/Regional (Tier 3) 15 PR 181 Sahuarita Pool and Recreation Complex /YMCA (Tier 1) 15 FM 97 Pima Co. North Clinic Relocation & Expansion 15 HP 115 Historic Ft. Lowell Park Master Plan Implementation 15 Green Valley Courthouse
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Communities of Innovation
    Creating Communities of Innovation www.AURP.net 6262 N. Swan Road, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85718 * Phone 520-529-2521 *Fax 520-529-2499 AURP Quick Facts AURP Mission Statement AURP fosters innovation, commercialization and economic growth through university, industry and government partnerships. • AURP is a professional association of university-related research, science and technology parks. • AURP supports over 300 university research parks worldwide. • AURP Members have reported over $1.5 Billion in planned research park development over the next 3 years, according to an AURP North American Member survey. • AURP Members include: • University Research Parks (planned and operating) • Real Estate Developers • Architects and Designers • Business Incubators • Financing Consultants • City, County and State Government Officials What is a Research Park? AURP defines a university research park as a property-based venture, which: • Master plans property designed for research and commercialization • Creates partnerships with universities and research institutions • Encourages the growth of new companies • Translates technology • Drives technology-led economic development 6262 N. Swan Road, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85718 * Phone 520-529-2521 *Fax 520-529-2499 History of AURP In 1986, a handful of farsighted research, technology and science park directors, recognizing that the concept of research-institute related parks was taking hold in board rooms around the world, organized the first international conference in the United States to discuss the future of research, science and tech parks. From that gathering in Tempe, Arizona, the Association of University Related Research Parks (AURRP), was formed in response to a growing interest in research and development activities based in such unique planned properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Nps Map A5282872-8D05
    t t E S S G t t B S B d u t D t a n n I S r S r k t l t e e R North S l o r e s To 95 t e o t c H B l o t m i t S m t S n l f b t t n l a le h S S u S u R t c o o t s a S n t E n S C T a R m n t o g V e u l S I s U D e M n n R l s E t M i e o F B V o e T p r s S n x e in t t P p s u r e l h H i L m e r u S C IE G o a S i u I C h u q e L t n n r R E L P H r r u n o T a i el a t S S k e S 1 R S w t gh C r S re t t 0 R 0 0.1 Kilometer 0.3 F t S t e M S Y a n t O r r E e M d u M k t t T R Phipps n S a S S e r H H l c i t Bunker Hill em a Forge Shop V D e l n t C o i o d S nt ll I 0 0.1 Mile 0.3 Street o o Monument S w h o n t e P R c e P S p Cemetery S W e M t IE S o M r o e R Bunker Hill t r t n o v C A t u R A s G S m t s y 9 C S h p a V e t q e t Community u n V I e e s E W THOMPSON S a t W 1 r e e s c y T s College e t r t e SQUARE i S v n n n d t Gate 4 t o S S P r A u w Y n S W t o i IE t a t n t o a lla L e R W c 5 S s t n e Boston Marine Society M C C S t i y n e t t o 8 r a a y h a r t e f e e e m t S L in t re l l A S o S S u C t S a em n P m o d t Massachusetts f h t w S S n a 1 i COMMUNITY u o t m S p r n S s h b e Commandant’s Korean War o M S i u COLLEGE t n t S t p S O S t b il c M TRAIN ING FIELD House Veterans Memorial d R l e D u d i n C R il n ti W p P t d s R o o S Y g u a u m u d USS Constitution i A sh t M r o D n W O in on h t th m t o SHIPYARD g g i er s S a n n lw Museum O P a M n i o a l W t U f n t n i E C PARK y B O Ly o o e n IE s n r v S t m D K a n H W d R N d e S S R y 2 S e t 2 a t 7 s R IG D t Y r Building
    [Show full text]
  • Record Interest Already Shown in Gothenburg Skyscraper Competition
    Sep 25, 2013 07:00 CEST Record interest already shown in Gothenburg skyscraper competition Which architect will win the commission to design the Nordic region’s tallest building? Trade organisation the Swedish Association of Architects is responsible for organising the architecture competition, which is now being advertised all over Europe, with interest already reaching an all time high. “We’ve never enjoyed so much interest in a competition before it even started, and I’ve already been contacted by a range of architecture firms from different countries,” said Claes Larsson, Competition Organiser at the Swedish Association of Architects. Monday 23 September marks the launch of the competition process with an open invitation extended to architects from all over Europe. Five teams of architects will be selected before Christmas, with the contest being settled between these five in January 2014. With interest in the competition scaling record heights, the renowned jury panel (see below) are set to have their hands full during the final quarter of the year. “It’s not inconceivable we could receive in the region of 80 entries,” added Larsson. A local landmark In addition to the Swedish Association of Architects, the event is being organised by SEFA AB, which conceived the idea, in consultation with Stadsbyggnadskontoret (the Gothenburg Town-Building Office) and municipal corporation Älvstrandens Utvecklings AB. The Gothenburg skyscraper project has already generated considerable interest, both in Sweden and abroad. The building has all the potential to become precisely the landmark required to instil life and vitality into the old port area. A thriving urban district “The jury panel will not only assess candidates based on their experience with tall buildings, but will also consider entries from a town planning perspective.” “We’re hoping to see ideas on how we can create a thriving urban district,” added Larsson.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent-Science-Park.Pdf
    An environment for success 2 Welcome. Kent Science Park is an award winning science park with a developing cluster of science and technology companies. The park has a history of innovation Set in 65 acres of beautifully – including Nobel Prize winning manicured grounds, Kent Science Park discoveries – and was awarded the boasts high specification laboratories UKSPA Best Life Science Research and business accommodation across Facility in South East England in 2016. 47 buildings. Why us? Location Services, facilities The Park Knowledge Factory Contact details and amenities and network Page 3 Page 5 Page 7 Page 9 Page 11 Page 13 3 4 Why us. We foster innovation, support growth and facilitate expansion. Kent Science Park was inspired by the We work hard to make your life easier and leaders and support the UK’s innovation design of the university campuses of to make the park an enjoyable place to community. Our site teams also provide Oxford and Cambridge. It provides a work. We host regular technical and social guidance and support throughout a unique environment for your team to work events that bring together scientific and company’s growth journey, to help and relax, and for your business to grow. business leaders. We connect start-ups, minimise risks and maximise your chances established businesses and industry of success. Onsite catering Onsite Connectivity Flexible facilities management accommodation service Managed solutions available 5 6 Gatwick Airport Location. 1 hour 10 minutes By Rail. By Road. Well connected to London and Europe. Sittingbourne has direct connections to Coming from London on the M2 take J5 then London St.
    [Show full text]
  • AREA Science Park: a Hub of Knowledge, Entrepreneurship and Businesses
    AREA Science Park: A hub of knowledge, entrepreneurship and businesses Trieste, Italy 1 General Information Title AREA Science Park Pitch Developing the economic system of enterprises through innovation and technological research Organisations AREA Science Park, Innovation Factory Country Italy Author Dr. Richard Woolley (Ingenio CSIC-UPV Universitat Politècnica de Valè- ncia) Nature of Collaboration in R&D Lifelong learning interaction Commercialisation of R&D Joint curriculum design results and delivery Mobility of staff Mobility of students Academic entrepreneurship Student entrepreneurship Governance Shared resources Supporting Strategic mechanism Structural Operational Policy Summary AREA Science Park is located in Trieste, North east of Italy, Friuli Venezia Giulia Region. The Mission of AREA Science Park is to develop the growth and competitiveness of enterprises through innovation and technologi- cal research, technology transfer, innovation management, manage- ment of R&D programmes and knowledge-intensive enterprise creation. AREA features top quality offices and labs, but also common spaces to encourage daily interaction between the companies and the research groups located there. AREA has an in-house incubator Innovation Factory, which supports would-be entrepreneurs from their initial idea to the birth of their start- up. From business plan validation to company acceleration, Innovation Factory accompanies start-ups along their growth path. Since Innovation Factory was founded in 2006 more than 1,600 business projects have been evaluated and 281 entrepreneurial ideas have embarked upon a valorization process. Fifty new start-up companies have been founded, of which 20 are co-founded by Innovation Factory. 2 Introduction & Overview 1. BACKGROUND Following an earthquake in 1976 which devasted the region of Friuli Venezia Giulia, the Italian Government took a strategic decision to revitalise the region by investing in innovative re- search to boost competitiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Update to the Interim Review of the Connecting Capability Fund Programme
    UPDATE TO THE INTERIM REVIEW OF THE CONNECTING CAPABILITY FUND PROGRAMME To inform the case for continued public funding for shared best practice, capability, capacity and collaboration in university commercialisation Authors: Elaine Eggington, Rupert Osborn and Emma Walker, IP Pragmatics Ltd October 2020 Commissioned by Research England Update to the interim review of the CCF programme ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IP Pragmatics would like to thank all those who have provided input into this study, including the project team at Research England, and in particular all those within the CCF project teams who have contributed information to the work. We acknowledge the efforts made by these individuals to provide the requested information and arrange in-depth interviews at short notice. About IP Pragmatics Limited IP Pragmatics (www.ip-pragmatics.com) helps our clients to create, progress and realise value from their intellectual property assets through the provision of integrated commercialisation and intellectual property management services. We are a specialist IP and technology management consultancy which combines intellectual property, technical and commercial expertise with a practical and pragmatic approach. Working in technology transfer for over 20 years, IP Pragmatics is a trusted, independent partner to universities, research institutes, public sector organisations and companies in over 20 countries. Our team of experienced ex-industry, university TT and IP specialists has active global industry networks and contacts. We use this collective expertise alongside extensive market, IP and scientific information resources, to provide analytical rigour and practical insights. London | Edinburgh | Sydney +44 (0) 203 176 0580 [email protected] 2 | Page Update to the interim review of the CCF programme CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]