DOCSLIB.ORG

Word Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Word Version Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for East Dorset Report to the Electoral Commission April 2002 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2002 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Boundary Committee for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report Number: 276 2 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? 5 SUMMARY 7 1 INTRODUCTION 13 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 15 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 19 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 21 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 23 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 47 APPENDIX A Final Recommendations for East Dorset: 49 Detailed Mapping A large map illustrating the existing and proposed ward boundaries for Colehill, Ferndown, Verwood and Wimborne Minster is inserted inside the back cover of this report. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 3 4 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to the Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No 3692). The Order also transferred to the Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them. Members of the Committee are: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Professor Michael Clarke CBE Kru Desai Robin Gray Archie Gall (Director) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England. Our aim is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, the number of councillors and ward names. We can also recommend changes to the electoral arrangements of parish and town councils. This report sets out our final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the district of East Dorset. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 5 6 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND SUMMARY The Local Government Commission for England (LGCE) began a review of East Dorset’s electoral arrangements on 27 March 2001. It published its draft recommendations for electoral arrangements on 9 October 2001, after which it undertook an eight-week period of consultation. As a consequence of the transfer of functions referred to earlier, it falls to us, the Boundary Committee for England, to complete the work of the LGCE and submit final recommendations to the Electoral Commission. • This report summarises the representations received by the LGCE during consultation on its draft recommendations, and contains our final recommendations to the Electoral Commission. We found that the existing arrangements provide unequal representation of electors in East Dorset: • in 14 of the 23 wards the number of electors represented by each councillor varies by more than 10 per cent from the average for the district and eight wards vary by more than 20 per cent; • by 2006 this situation is not expected to improve, with the number of electors per councillor forecast to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average in 14 wards and by more than 20 per cent in eight wards. Our main final recommendations for future electoral arrangements (see Tables 1 and 2 and paragraphs 99-100) are that: • East Dorset District Council should have 36 councillors, the same as at present; • there should be 24 wards, instead of the current 23; • the boundaries of 22 of the existing wards should be modified, resulting in a net increase of one, and one ward should retain its existing boundary; • elections should continue to take place every four years. The purpose of these proposals is to ensure that, in future, each district councillor represents approximately the same number of electors, bearing in mind local circumstances. • In 21 of the proposed 24 wards the number of electors per councillor would vary by no more than 10 per cent from the district average. • This improved level of electoral equality is forecast to continue, with the number of electors per councillor in only one ward, Crane, expected to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average for the district in 2006. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 7 Recommendations are also made for changes to parish and town council electoral arrangements which provide for: • revised warding arrangements and the redistribution of councillors for the parishes of Alderholt, Colehill and Corfe Mullen; • revised warding arrangements and the redistribution of councillors for Ferndown, Verwood and Wimborne Minster town councils; • revised warding arrangements and the redistribution of councillors for the grouped parishes of Pamphill & Shapwick, Knowlton and Vale of Allen; All further correspondence on these final recommendations and the matters discussed in this report should be addressed to the Electoral Commission, which will not make an Order implementing them before 15 May 2002: The Secretary Electoral Commission Trevelyan House 30 Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW 8 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND Table 1: Final Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map councillors reference part of Alderholt parish (the proposed Alderholt 1 Alderholt 1 Maps 2 & A2 South parish ward) part of Ferndown parish (the proposed Ameysford 2 Ameysford 1 Large map parish ward) part of Colehill parish (the proposed Colehill East 3 Colehill East 2 Large map parish ward) part of Colehill parish (the proposed Colehill West 4 Colehill West 1 parish ward); part of Wimborne Minster parish (the Large map proposed Cranfield parish ward) part of Corfe Mullen parish (the proposed Corfe 5 Corfe Mullen Central 2 Maps 2 & A3 Mullen Central parish ward) part of Corfe Mullen parish (the proposed Corfe 6 Corfe Mullen North 1 Maps 2 & A3 Mullen North parish ward) part of Corfe Mullen parish (the proposed Corfe 7 Corfe Mullen South 1 Maps 2 & A3 Mullen South parish ward) the parishes of Cranborne, Edmondsham, Wimborne 8 Crane 1 St Giles and Woodlands; part of Alderholt parish Map 2 (the proposed Alderholt North parish ward) part of Ferndown parish (the proposed Ferndown 9 Ferndown Central 2 Large map Central parish ward) part of Ferndown parish (the proposed Ferndown 10 Ferndown Links 2 Large map Links parish ward) the parishes of Gussage All Saints, Gussage St 11 Handley Vale 1 Michael, Long Crichel, Moor Crichel, Pentridge, Map 2 Sixpenny Handley and Witchampton the parishes of Chalbury, Holt, Hinton Martell and 12 Holt 1 Hinton Parva; part of Horton parish (the proposed Map 2 Horton West parish ward) part of Ferndown parish (the proposed Longham 13 Longham 1 Large map parish ward) the parish of West Parley; part of Ferndown parish 14 Parley 2 (the proposed Ferndown Links South and Longham Large map East parish wards) part of St Leonards & St Ives parish (St Leonards & St Leonards & St Ives 15 2 St Ives East and St Leonards & St Ives South parish Map 2 East wards) St Leonards & St Ives part of St Leonards & St Ives parish (St Leonards & 16 West 1 Map 2 St Ives West parish ward) part of Ferndown parish (the proposed Stapehill 17 Stapehill 1 Large map parish ward) the parishes of Shapwick and Sturminster Marshall; 18 Stour 1 part of Pamphill parish (the proposed Pamphill North Map 2 parish ward) part of Verwood parish (the proposed Three Cross & 19 Three Cross & Potterne 1 Large map Potterne parish ward) Verwood Stephen’s part of Verwood parish (the proposed Verwood 20 2 Large map Castle Stephen’s Castle parish ward) part of Verwood parish (the proposed Verwood 21 Verwood Dewlands 2 Dewlands parish ward); part of Horton parish (the Large map proposed Horton East parish ward) part of Verwood parish (the proposed Verwood 22 Verwood Newtown 1 Newtown parish ward) Large map BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 9 Number of Constituent areas Map Ward name councillors reference the parish of West Moors (West Moors North and 23 West Moors 3 West Moors South parish wards) Map 2 part of Wimborne Minster parish (the proposed Wimborne Minster parish ward); part of Colehill 24 Wimborne Minster 3 parish (the proposed Lacy and Parmiter parish Large map wards); part of Pamphill parish (the proposed Pamphill South parish ward) Notes: 1 The whole district is parished. 2 The wards on the above table are illustrated on Map 2, Maps A1–A3 in Appendix A and on the large map at the back of this report. 10 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND Table 2: Final Recommendations for East Dorset Ward name Number Electorate Number of Variance Electorate Number of Variance of (2001) electors per from (2006) electors per from councillors councillor average councillor average % % 1 Alderholt 1 2,136 2,136 10 2,228 2,228 9 2 Ameysford 1 2,124 2,124 10 2,138 2,138 5 3 Colehill East 2 3,887 1,944 0 3,944 1,972 -3 4 Colehill West 1 1,970 1,970 2 2,013 2,013 -1 5 Corfe Mullen Central 2 4,104 2,052 6 4,150 2,075 2 6 Corfe Mullen North 1 1,968 1,968
Load more

Recommended publications
  • East Dorset Rural Area Profile Christchurch and East Dorset East Dorset Rural Area Profile
    Core Strategy Area Profile Options for Consideration Consultation 4th October – 24th December 2010 East Dorset Rural Area Prepared by Christchurch Borough Council and East Dorset District Council as part of the Local Development Framework October 2010 Contents 1 Area Overview 2 2 Baseline Data 2 3 Planning Policy Context 3 4 Existing Community Facilities 4 5 Accessibility Mapping 5 6 Community Strategy Issues 5 7 Retail Provision 6 8 Housing 6 9 Employment 13 10 Transport 16 11 Core Strategic Messages 18 East Dorset Rural Area Profile Christchurch and East Dorset East Dorset Rural Area Profile 1 Area Overview 1.1 The rural area of East Dorset is made up of the villages and rural area outside of the main urban settlements of the the District, which form part of the South East Dorset Conurbation. 1.2 The villages can be divided into two types, the smaller villages of Chalbury, Edmondsham, Furzehill, Gaunt’s Common, Gussage All Saints, Gussage St Michael, Hinton Martell, Hinton Parva, Holt, Horton, Long Crichel, Moor Crichel, Pamphill, Shapwick, Wimborne St Giles, Witchampton and Woodlands and the four larger villages of Sturminster Marshall, Cranborne, Alderholt and Sixpenny Handley have a larger range of facilities. 1.3 The southerly villages from Edmondsham southwards to Holt and Pamphill are constrained by the South East Dorset Green Belt while the more northerly and easterly ones from Pentridge southwards to Sturminster Marshall fall within the Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. 2 Baseline Data 2.1 The total population in the 2001 census for the smaller villages was 5,613.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranborne Chase 13.Pub
    Electoral Division Profile 2013 East Dorset Cranborne Chase Electoral Division Total Population: 8,540 (2011 Mid Year Estimate, DCC) Number of Electors: 6,988 (Dec 2012, EDDC) Cranborne Chase Electoral Division is composed of the following parishes: Sixpenny Handley, Pentridge, Long Crichel, Moor Crichel, Gussage St Micheal, Gussage All Saints, Wimborne St Giles, Cranborne, Edmonsham, Alderholt, Woodlands, Witchampton, Horton, Chalbury, Hinton Martell and Hinton Parva. Within the division there are no libraries (the nearest is in Verwood). There are also 6 schools (5 primary and 1 middle). Population Cranborne East Dorset 2011 Mid-Year Population Estimates, ONS & DCC Chase Electoral Dorset (DCC) Division All 8,540 87,170 412,910 % aged 0-15 years 17.6% 15.6% 16.3% % aged 16-64 years 62.1% 56.5% 58.5% % aged 65-84 years 17.6% 23.5% 21.3% % aged 85+ years 2.6% 4.4% 3.9% Cranborne Chase division has a total population of 8,540. The division has a younger age profile than the County average, 20.2% are aged 65+ years compared with 25.2% across Dorset. Cranborne Chase Electoral Division, PAGE 1 Ethnicity/Country of Birth Cranborne Chase East Dorset Census, 2011 Electoral Dorset (DCC) Division % white British 96.7 96.2 95.5 % Black and minority ethnic groups (BME) 3.3 3.8 4.5 % England 92.3 91.8 91.0 % born rest of UK 3.3 3.3 3.4 % Rep of IRE 0.3 0.4 0.4 % EU (member countries in 2001) 1.3 1.2 1.3 % EU (Accession countries April 2001 to March 2011) 0.3 0.4 0.7 % born elsewhere 2.6 2.9 3.1 The proportion from black and minority ethnic groups is lower than the County average (3.3% compared with 4.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for East Dorset
    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for East Dorset October 2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2001 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 5 3 SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED 9 4 ANALYSIS AND DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 11 5 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 33 APPENDICES A Draft Recommendations for East Dorset: 35 Detailed Mapping B Code of Practice on Written Consultation 39 A large map illustrating the existing and proposed ward boundaries for Colehill, Ferndown, Verwood and Wimborne Minster is inserted inside the back cover of this report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chase, the Hart and the Park an Exploration of the Historic Landscapes of the Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
    The Chase, the Hart and Park The Chase, the Hart and the Park An exploration of the historic landscapes of the Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty This publication was prepared following a one-day seminar held by the Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in November 2006. The day was open to anyone interested in finding out more about recent work on this remarkable historic landscape. A panel of speakers were invited to follow in some of the best traditions of a BBC ‘Time Team’ style exercise in setting out what it is we know and how we know it - and what it is we don’t know and would like to find out. The papers are published here in the order in which they were given. It is hoped this will be the first of an Occasional Papers Series which will explore various aspects of the history and the natural history in the making of a very distinctive tract of countryside which lies across the borders of four counties, Dorset, Wiltshire, Hampshire and Somerset. The aim of the series is to make current research on this area available to a much wider readership than would normally be possible through strictly academic publication. Each contributor has been invited to append an outline of sources, notes for further reading and to make reference to forthcoming academic publication where applicable. The Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is a nationally designated landscape covering 981 square kilometres of Dorset, Hampshire, Wiltshire and Somerset.
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch Borough Council and East Dorset District Council Housing Allocation Policy
    1 CHRISTCHURCH BOROUGH COUNCIL AND EAST DORSET DISTRICT COUNCIL JOINT ALLOCATION POLICY. DECEMBER 2013 Amended NOVEMBER 2016 Contents Section 1 Introduction 2 Statutory Background 3 Introduction to the CED Allocation Policy 4 Qualification for the CED Allocation Policy 5 CED Priorities 6 Determining priorities of applicants 7 Administering applications 8 Allocations and Lettings 9 Administration Appendix 1 Allocating Temporary Accommodation Appendix 2 Allocating Extra Care Accommodation Appendix 3 Sensitive Lettings Appendix 4 Owner Occupiers Appendix 5 Summary of bands Appendix 6 Medical and Welfare Assessment Appendix 7 Definitions 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Christchurch Borough Council and East Dorset District Council (known as the Councils in this document), have agreed a common approach for the allocation of social housing across the two local authority areas and have joined a wider Dorset Partnership to operate a choice based lettings scheme called Dorset Home Choice. The scheme is made up of 8 local authority partners operating 3 different allocation policies. This document outlines the allocation policy for the Christchurch and East Dorset Councils (known as CED in this document). Choice based lettings is a system for letting social housing which allows housing applicants more choice by advertising vacancies and inviting applicants to express an interest in being the tenant of any given property. 1.2 The Policy has been developed within the context of national policy particularly the freedoms and flexibilities granted to local authorities
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Dorset Council
    Public Document Pack Cabinet Date: Tuesday, 3 November 2020 Time: 10.00 am Venue: MS Teams Live Event Membership: (Quorum 3) Spencer Flower (Chairman), Peter Wharf (Vice-Chairman), Ray Bryan, Graham Carr- Jones, Tony Ferrari, Laura Miller, Andrew Parry, Gary Suttle, Jill Haynes and David Walsh Cabinet Lead Members (6) (are not members of the Cabinet but are appointed to work along side Portfolio Holders) Cherry Brooks, Piers Brown, Simon Gibson, Nocturin Lacey-Clarke, Byron Quayle and Jane Somper Chief Executive: Matt Prosser, South Walks House, South Walks Road, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 1UZ (Sat Nav DT1 1EE) For easy access to the Council agendas and minutes download the free public app Mod.gov for use on your iPad, Android and Windows tablet. Once downloaded select Dorset Council. For more information about this agenda please contact Kate Critchel 01305 252234 - [email protected] Due to the current coronavirus pandemic the Council has reviewed its approach to holding committee meetings. Members of the public are welcome to attend this meeting and listen to the debate either online by using the following link: Link to meeting via Teams Live Event Members of the public wishing to view the meeting from an iphone, ipad or android phone will need to download the free Microsoft Team App to sign in as a Guest, it is advised to do this at least 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting.” Please note that public speaking has been suspended. However Public Participation will continue by written submission only. Please see detail set out below.
    [Show full text]
  • East Dorset Local Plan Options East Dorset District Council Contents
    Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 A Picture of East Dorset 8 3 Strategic Policy 19 3.1 Challenges, Vision & Strategic Objectives 19 3.2 The Key Strategy 25 4 Core Policies & Development Management 53 4.1 Environment 53 4.2 Green Belt 74 4.3 Housing 79 4.4 Heritage & Conservation 89 4.5 Landscape, Design & Open Spaces 91 4.6 Economic Growth 99 4.7 Bournemouth Airport 110 5 Site Allocations and Area Based Policies 116 5.1 Wimborne, Colehill & Corfe Mullen 116 5.1.1 Introduction 116 5.1.2 Housing 116 5.1.3 Open Space 141 5.1.4 Town, District & Local Centres 144 5.2 Ferndown, West Parley and Longham 150 5.2.1 Introduction 150 5.2.2 Housing 150 5.2.3 Open Space 170 5.2.4 Town, District & Local Centres 170 5.2.5 Employment 180 5.3 Verwood, St Leonards, St Ives & West Moors 182 5.3.1 Introduction 182 5.3.2 Housing 183 5.3.3 Open Space 201 5.3.4 Town, District & Local Centres 202 5.3.5 Community Facilities & Services 208 East Dorset Local Plan Options East Dorset District Council Contents 5.4 Rural settlements in East Dorset 210 5.4.1 Introduction 210 5.4.2 Alderholt 211 5.4.3 Cranborne 218 5.4.4 Edmondsham 224 5.4.5 Furzehill 229 5.4.6 Gaunts Common 232 5.4.7 Gussage All Saints 234 5.4.8 Gussage St Michael 235 5.4.9 Hinton Martell 235 5.4.10 Holt 240 5.4.11 Horton 242 5.4.12 Longham 243 5.4.13 Shapwick 245 5.4.14 Sixpenny Handley 246 5.4.15 Sturminster Marshall 252 5.4.16 Three Legged Cross 261 5.4.17 Wimborne St Giles 263 5.4.18 Woodlands / Whitmore 268 Appendices A Affordable Housing Definitions 272 B Guidelines for the Establishment of Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANGs) 276 C Glossary 284 East Dorset District Council East Dorset Local Plan Options Introduction 1 East Dorset Local Plan Options East Dorset District Council 1 1 Introduction 1 Introduction What is the Local Plan (Review)? 1.0.1 The East Dorset Local Plan (Review) is the document which sets out the planning strategy for East Dorset District over the next 15 years to 2033.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal No.2
    T » ?1 ! 1 T II INDEX Foreword 1 * Rescue Excavation Blandford By-Pass, 1983 2 Henge Monuments 5 Excavation of Ring Ditch at Wyke Down 6 Book Reviews 9 Rempstone - A Study in Neglect 10 Book Review 15 Extracts from Experimental Shale Working Projects 16 Archaeological Excavations on the site of the Queen Elizabeth Grammar School, Wimbome Minster 18 Road Fever 23 Animal Safari 26 Tarrant Abbey 28 The Seventeenth Century Token Coinage of East Dorset 31 The Red House Museum 35 COMMITTEE MEMBERS 1984/85 Chairman: John W Day General Secretary: Dennis Bicheno Vice Chairman: Haydn Everall Treasurer: Les Baker Membership Secretary: Della Day Special Adviser: Martin Green Social Secretary: Cherry Trent Members: Janet Bicheno; Sylvia Church; Phil Coles; Teresa Hall; Ann Sims; Bob Vincent We thank Len Norris and Brian Tiller for their work in the past year* FOREWORD We have pleasure in presenting our second Journal, which we hope you will read and enjoy* The first year of E.D.A.S. has been one full of interest and varied activity, and two excavations have been particularly exciting. The discovery of a Henge Monument at Wyke Down, Gussage St. Michael was most unexpected and is the first in Wessex* Martin Green now wonders how many of the ring ditch crop and soil marks which he has photographed and not ploughed-out barrows, as hitherto assumed, but more henges. On the Blandford Bypass we excavated part of a Bronze Age village, which made us realise just how much more there is to find. The post-holes of the huts and their porches were clearly visible, despite the passage of earth-moving machinery.
    [Show full text]
  • SIF Implementation Specification (UK)
    table of contents Schools Interoperability Framework™ Implementation Specification (United Kingdom) 1.1 June 19, 2008 This version: http://specification.sifinfo.org/Implementation/UK/1.1/ Previous version: http://specification.sifinfo.org/Implementation/UK/1.0/ Latest version: http://specification.sifinfo.org/Implementation/UK/ 1 of 1189 Schemas SIF_Message (single file, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) SIF_Message (single file, annotated) (ZIP archive) SIF_Message (includes, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) SIF_Message (includes, annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (single file, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (single file, annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (includes, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (includes, annotated) (ZIP archive) Note: SIF_Message schemas define every data object element as optional per SIF's Publish/Subscribe and SIF Request/Response Models; DataModel schemas maintain the cardinality of all data object elements. Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include some normative corrections. This document is also available in these non-normative formats: ZIP archive, PDF (for printing as a single file), Excel spreadsheet. Copyright ©2008 Schools Interoperability Framework (SIF™) Association. All Rights Reserved. 2 of 1189 3 of 1189 1 Preamble 1.1 Abstract 1.1.1 What is SIF? The Schools Interoperability Framework (SIF) is not a product, but a technical blueprint for enabling diverse applications to interact and share data related to entities in the pK-12 instructional and administrative environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Magazine.September 2019.Pdf
    Cover: The Corn Harvest, by Pieter Breugel the Elder, https://commons.wikimedia.org HARVEST SUPPER with Local, Organic, Animal-Friendly, Fair-Trade Food and a talk: ‘Hope for our Blue Planet’ by Andy Lester (Conservation Director for A Rocha UK) September 14th at 6.30 pm, in Church House Tickets from Parish Office (no charge – donations welcome) Advertisement Wimborne Horticultural Society's Sew Perfect 72nd Autumn Flower Show Seamstress, Alterations Saturday 14th September, 12 noon to 4 pm, Allendale & Repairs, Community Centre. including bridal. There are open classes so why not enter one of our many 45 years experience. classes in fruit, vegetables, flowers, floral art, cookery and Contact photography? Shirley Chandler, Schedules will be available from 07752632412. the Allendale Centre the first week in September. Details from the General Secretary on 01202 887006. Contact details Rector The Revd Andrew Rowland 01202 882340 [email protected] Churchwardens Mr Peter Cook 01202 885470 [email protected] Mr Andrew Patrick 01202 886871 [email protected] Assoc. Priests The Revd Suzie Allen 01258 840668 [email protected] The Revd Bill French 01258 841061 [email protected] The Revd Heather Waldsax 01202 884753 [email protected] The Revd Elise Harding 01202 884775 [email protected] Vergers Mr John Hughes 01202 884753 [email protected] Mr Ashley Coombs 01202 884753 [email protected] Admin. Assist. Mrs Donna Gosney 01202 884753 [email protected] Parish Secretary Mrs Jane MacCaig 01202 884753 The Parish office is open Monday-Friday 10am - 12 noon [email protected] www.wimborneminster.org.uk http://fb.me/TheMinster1 @TheMinster1 Parish Magazine publication details Co-editors: Rosalind Jensen and Barry Gibbs.
    [Show full text]
  • East Dorset District Council Planning Committee 11Th August, 2009
    Everyone 7 128 1799 rep_agd_ID Draft 3 Chief Executives 1 0 57 rep_exe_IDsNo No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No NoENV1 11/08/2009 09:30:47 Chief Executive Old 52 1 East Dorset District Council Planning Committee Agenda Item No 6 11th August, 2009 Public Report Schedule of Planning Applications Item for Decision: To consider the planning applications contained within the schedule and to receive details of any withdrawn or requested deferred applications, if any. Contributors Chief Executive Contact Officer Michael Hirsh, Head of Planning & Building Control Financial Implications: None. Council Priorities: ENV1 Recommendations: It is RECOMMENDED that the applications contained in this schedule be determined or otherwise dealt with in accordance with the Head of Planning and Building Control's recommendation. 1. Applicable Lead Member Area(s) 1.1 Environment. 2. Crime and Disorder – Section 17 Implications 2.1 Where there is a specific crime and disorder matter that is a material planning consideration, it will form part of the report related to the particular application. 3. Equalities Implications 3.1 There are no known reasons to believe that the services provided are discriminatory against people because of their race, disability, belief or religion, age, gender or sexuality. 4. Risk Implications 4.1 There are risk implications associated with this report. These relate to the potential for judicial review or maladministration if the applications being reported have not been considered properly in a procedural sense or there is a substantial flaw in the consideration.
    [Show full text]