DOCSLIB.ORG

MS 113 Stanley: Misc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MS 113 Stanley: Misc Corpus Christi College Cambridge / PARKER-ON-THE-WEB M.R. James, Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge 1912 MS 113 Stanley: Misc. A TJames: vac. Letters of Martin Bucer, Philipp Melanchthon etc. Letters of Bucer, Melanchthon etc. Codicology: Paper, mm 315 x 220 (12.33 x 8.5 in.), pp. 446 numbered. Additions: A fragment of the xvth cent. service-book, pasted over, serves as flyleaf. (ff. iiir-iiiv) Foliation: ff. i-iii + pp. 1-4 + 4a-5a + 5-14 (15-18 missing) + 19-72 + 72a-73a + 73-166 + 166a-167a + 167-206 + ff. 207a-h + 207j-k + pp. 209-228 + ff. 229-230 + pp. 231-328 + 328a-l + 329-446 + ff. iv-v. Language: Latin, English and Greek. Contents: 1. 1-4 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to Princess Elizabeth[] sister of Edward VI[] dated September 1549 Epistola [Buceri[]] ad dominam Elizabetham regis sororem[], data Lambethae[] 6 kal. Sept. 1549: in qua commendat ei peregrinum quendam qui religionis ergo in Angliam[] venerat 2. 4a-5a Letter of Roger Ascham[] to Princess Elizabeth[] dated November 1550 Epistola [ut videtur Aschami[]] data 13 kal. Nov. 1550, mittit dominae Elizabethae[] duo exemplaria libelli a Sturmio[] editi nomine autoris 3. 5-12 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to the Marquis of Dorchester[] dated 26 December 1550 Epistola [Buceri[]] ad Marchionem Dorcestrensem[] data 26 Dec. 1550, gratulatur ei quod in concilium supremum cooptatus esset, et multis argumentis suadet, ne bona ecclesiae olim dicata in alios usus alienentur, sed ad ministros Dei sustentandos et alios pios usus omnino applicentur See Gasquet and Bishop, Edward VI and the Book of Common Prayer, p. 268 note[Gasquet and Bishop 1890] 4. 13-20 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to the Marquis of Northampton[] Epistola [Buceri[]] ad marchionem Northamptonensem[], in qua orat ut pensio assignetur Sleidano[] a rege, ut historiam suam reformationis ecclesiae jam dudum inceptam perficere queat 5. 21-30 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to James Haddon[] dated at Cambridge[] 22 May 1550 Epistola [Buceri[]] ad I. Haddonum[] data Cantabrigiae[] 22 Maii, 1550, de matrimonio contracto et consummate invitis parentibus In two hands, dictated by Bucer[] 27 () “cum per manuum imbecillitatem non possem scribere” 6. 31-38 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to John Cheke[] dated at Cambridge[] 3 December 1550 Epistola [Buceri[]] ad Iohannem Chekum[] de causa cujusdam Blithi[] collegii Jesu socii, qui papisticae superstitioni addictus praeter duo beneficia ecclesiastica sodalitio et optimo cubiculo adhuc fruebatur, et nepotem suum in sodalitio successorem instituere nitebatur; data Cantabrigiae[] 3 Dec. 1550 7. 39-40 Reasons why the lord's board should rather be after the form of a table than of an altar Reasons why the lordes boorde shoulde rather be after the forme of a table than of an aultar [Nasmith:] Imprynted at London[] by Richard Grafton[] printer to the kings majestie, 1550 See Gasquet and Bishop, Edward VI and the Book of Common Prayer, p. 266[Gasquet and Bishop 1890] 8. 41-44 Letter of Martin Bucer[] on the abolition of altars Epistola Buceri[] de demoliendis altaribus See Gasquet and Bishop, Edward VI and the Book of Common Prayer, p. 266[Gasquet and Bishop 1890] : Gorham, Gleanings, p. 209[Gorham, Gorham and Bird 1857] 9. 45-56 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to Johann Gropper[] dated at Bonn (?)[] January 1543 Epistola Buceri[] ad Gropperum[] data Bonnae[] postridie circumcisionis 1543, in qua se defendit quod secundam uxorem eamque viduam contra canones duxerat 10. 57-68 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to Johann Gropper[] dated at Bonn (?)[] February 1543 Epistola Buceri[] ad eundem data Bonnae[] pridie kalendas Februarias 1543, in qua se vindicat contra Colonienses, quibus ut Lutheranus minus gratus erat Burnet, History of the Reformation (Records no. XIX, V. 177, ed. Pocock)[Pocock 1865e] 11. 69-94 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to the Elector of Brandenburg[] dated at Augsburg[] April 1548 Epistola Buceri[] data Augustae[] ex illustr. princ. elector. Brandeburg[] diversorio Apr. 13, 1548, in qua summam doctrinae suae tradit, et ecclesiarum reconciliatione agit 12. 95-118 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to the synod of Cologne[] dated at Bonn (?)[] February 1543 Epistola Buceri[] ad patres synodum celebraturos [in dioecesi Coloniensi[]] data Bonnae[] 9 Feb. 1543, in qua totam doctrinae et fidei suae rationem eis declarat 13. 119-126 Letter of Martin Bucer[] dated 17 May 1547 Epistola Buceri[] data 17 Maii 1547, in qua agit de rebus Germanicis praesertim de pace cum imperatore facta 14. 127-130 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to Henry Bullinger[] dated at Augsburg[] January 1545 Epistola Buceri[] ad Bullingerum[] data Argentorati[] 21 Jan. 1545, in qua agit de libro Bullingeri contra Cochleum[], et de dissentione inter doctores ecclesiae reformatae de eucharistia quam valde deplorat, additque quaedam de presenti statu Germaniae[] et de concilio Trident.[] a Paulo III[] revocato 15. 131-140 Letter of Martin Bucer[] to Theodor Buchmann (Theodor Bibliander)[] Epistola Buceri[] ad Bibliandrum de Carlostadio[], de controversia inter Lutherum[] et Zuinglium[], et de suis [Buceri] retractionibus 16. 141-154 Letter of Johann Sturm[] to Roger Ascham[] dated at Augsburg[] September 1550 Epistola Sturmii[] ad Aschamum[] data Argentorati[] nonis Sept. 1550, in qua fuse agit de ratione quam observat in juvenibus instituendis, et dicit se misisse duo exemplaria sui libelli regi et dominae Elizabethae[] sorori ejus Aschami Epistolae 1703, p. 23[Ascham 1703] 17. 155-164 Letter of Martin Schelling[] to the people of Augsburg[] dated at Wolfach (?)[] September 1541 Epistola Martini Schellingi[] ad Argentinenses data Wolfachiae[] 10 Sept. 1541, de eis quae in ecclesia Argentinensi[] adhuc sint corrigenda 18. 165-168 Letter of Philipp Melanchthon[] to Martin Bucer[] dated January Epistola Philippi Melanchtonis[] ad Bucerum[] data 12 die Jan. quod imperator et rex Gallicus consenserunt ut concilium generale per pontificem indiceretur et Tridenti[] haberetur Autograph 19. 169-173 The names of the members of the convocation that were for or against priests marriage, 1548 MS 114. 131[CCC114A]. Cf. MS 121. 6[CCC121] 20. 174-174 The opinion of T. Redmain[] in favor of priests' marriage The opinion of T. Redmain[] in favor of their marriage MS 114. 132[CCC114A] Burnet, History of the Reformation (Records no. XXX, V. 231)[Pocock 1865e] 21. 175-188 John MacAlpine (Maccabeus)[], De coniugio sacerdotum De conjugio sacerdotum, an liceat sacris initiatis contrahere matrimonium: affirmatur. autore Iohanne Macchabeo Scoto[] 22. 189-196 Proposita de veteri et novo instrumento ex scripturis utriusque testamenti 23. 197-200 On simoniacs An simoniacum sit necnon aliquid exigere ab eo qui ad praebendam assumi debet ecclesiasticam, quocunque illud nomine exigatur ? negatur 24. 201-206 On the sanctity of churches An templa consecrata filio Dei bona conscientia Anti-christo sint deferenda ? negatur 25. 207ar-207ev Matthew Parker[], Discourse against alienation of the revenues of the church Non debere res ecclesiasticas, ad publicum sacri ministerii usum destinatas, ad alios usus aut ad privatas hominum commoditates transferri; et proinde non posse bona cum conscientia episcopum aliquem designatum aut designandum hujusmodi alienationibus consentire Strype, Parker, Appendix 7[Strype 1711] 26. 207fr-207gv On the alienability of church dignities An liceat ecclesiasticae personae ea conditione dignitatem ecclesiasticam acceptare, ut post susceptionem aliquos proventus illius dignitatis ab ecclesia alienaret in perpetuum ? negatur 27. 207hr-207kv On the abolition of superstition An deleri possunt quorum usu in superstitione, &c. 28. 209-228 Tract on the reform of the ministry of the church Tractatus, quod reformatio sacri ministerii dum illud episcopi et presbiteri negligunt, ad quos cum primis pertinet ecclesiis sua munia instaurare, illis competit, qui in eo populo, cui sacrum ministerium restituendum est, potestatem gladii administrant et non Caesari, nisi illi officium hac in re suum negligant 29. 229r-230v De significatione verbi προσφέρω et προσφέρομαι per Laurentium Oxoniensem[] 30. 231-232 On the security of church appointments from lay interference An liceat recipere seu restituere in ecclesiis nostris adiaphora spe impetrandae pacis, et hac qualicunque moderatione mitigandi iram imperatoris, ne prorsus expellat ex ecclesiis nostris pios pastores 31. 233-234 Letter on the security of church appointments from lay interference Epistola de eadem re 32. 235-242 Instructions of inquisitions in Germany[] temp. Emperor Charles V [] Instructio inquisitorum inferioris Germaniae[], tempore imperatoris Caroli V [] 33. 243-254 Letter of Jacob Sadolet[] to P. Carol[] dated at Carpentras[] April 1539 Epistola Jacobi Caroli Sadoleti episcopi Carpentor[], ad P. Carolum[] data Carpentoracti[] 13 kal. Apr. 1539, de purgatorio 34. 255-274 Stephen Gardiner[], Tract addressed to Martin Bucer[] on human and divine law Tractatus Stephani Gardiner episcopi Winton[], ad Bucerum[] scriptus, in quo probare conatur, contemptum humanae legis justa autoritate latae gravius et severius vindicandum quam divinae legis qualemcunque transgressionem 35. 275-278 On the legitimacy of clerical marriage An liceat episcopo aut sacerdoti, post ademptum episcopatum aut sacerdotium, ducere uxorem ? affirmatur 36. 279-280 On the errors of the anabaptists Praecipui quidam anabaptistarum errores Also on p. 289 37. 281-290 Letter of Jacob Acontius[] Epistola I. Acontii[], in qua defendit opinionem suam in ecclesiastico senatu allatam de diversis significationibus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peter Canisius and the Protestants a Model of Ecumenical Dialogue?
    journal of jesuit studies 1 (2014) 373-399 brill.com/jjs Peter Canisius and the Protestants A Model of Ecumenical Dialogue? Hilmar M. Pabel Department of History, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada [email protected] Abstract Some modern interpreters have incorrectly suggested that Peter Canisius was an ecumenist before his time. Their insistence on his extraordinary kindness towards Protestants does not stand the test of the scrutiny of the relevant sources. An analysis of Canisius’s advice on how Jesuits should deal with “heretics” in Germany, of his catechisms, and of his polemical works reveals a typical Catholic controversialist of the Reformation era. Canisius was disposed to display hostility, more than good will, to Protestants. Keywords Peter Canisius – Protestants – Reformation – apologetics Introduction: The Celebration of a Saint Peter Canisius’s path to canonization was a long one. He died in 1597. The for- mal ecclesiastical process to declare him a saint began in 1625, but his beatifica- tion, solemnly pronounced by Pope Pius IX, had to wait until 1864.1 In Militantis ecclesiae (1897), Pope Leo XIII marked the 300th anniversary of Canisius’s death by hailing him as “the second apostle of Germany.” St. Boniface, the eighth- century Anglo-Saxon missionary, was the first. Pius XI not only canonized Canisius in 1925; he also declared him a doctor of the universal church.2 This 1 Forian Rieß, Der selige Petrus Canisius aus der Gesellschaft Jesu (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 1865), 552, 554. 2 Otto Braunsberger, “Sanctus Petrus Canisius Doctor Ecclesiae,” Gregorianum 6 (1925): 338. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2014 | doi 10.1163/22141332-00103002Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 04:37:36AM via free access <UN> 374 Pabel was a rare distinction, as Yves de la Brière reported two weeks later in the Jesuit journal Études.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Canisius John Donnelly Marquette University, [email protected]
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette History Faculty Research and Publications History, Department of 1-1-1981 Peter Canisius John Donnelly Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. "Peter Canisius," in Shapers of Religious Traditions in Germany, Switzerland, and Poland, 1560-1600. Eds. Jill Raitt. eN w Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981: 141-156. DOI. © 2008 Yale University Press. Used with permission. 9 l?eJreJR- ~RN151U5 1521-1597 JOHN PATRICK DONNELLY LIFE Peter Kanijs, or Canisius, was born at Nijmegen in 152 L Jakob Kanijs, Peter's father, was a man of culture who had attended the Universities of Paris and Orleans and had served as tutor to the sons of Duke Rene II of Lorraine. Later he proved an astute businessman and politician, serving nine terms as mayor ofNijmegen. As his eldest son, Peter received the best education available, first at the local Latin school, then at a nearby boarding establishment, and finally at the University of Cologne. Cologne was a natural choice, even though the university had fallen on evil days, for the Rhine !jnked it to Nijmegen, and Jakob Kanijs had business connections there. Among staunch Catholics such as the Kani;s family, C0- logne was renowned, as the German Rome, filled with old churches and relics of.the saints. Jakob entrusted his son to two outstanding priests, Andrew Herll and Nicholas van Esche, who introduced their fifteen-year-old charge to the Dutch and Rhenish spirituality of the late Middle Ages. Through van Esche, Canisiusbecame friendly with Gerard Kalckbrenner and Johannes Lanspergiy.s, the prior and subprior at the Charterhouse of St.
    [Show full text]
  • One for Knowlege Bank
    Seeking Reconciliation Without Capitulation: The History of Justification in Lutheran-Roman Catholic Dialogue Undergraduate Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with honors research distinction in History in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Gregory McCollum The Ohio State University May 2018 Project Advisor: Professor David Brakke, Department of History McCollum !1 Introduction In 1999, the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity and the Lutheran World Federation claimed to have reached a “high degree of agreement” on the doctrine of justification with the signing of the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification.1 Catholics and Lutherans, the document claimed, could “articulate a common understanding” of justification that “encompass[es] a consensus on basic truths of the doctrine” (JD §5). So great was this agreement on justification, which was of “central importance” to the Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century, that the Joint Declaration declared that the “remaining differences” between the communions’ understanding of justification are today “no longer the occasion for doctrinal condemnations (JD §1,5).” The anathemas and condemnations relating to justification that the two churches issued during the sixteenth century are no longer considered to apply to the two communions’ understanding of justification today. The Joint Declaration claims that the doctrinal condemnations of the 16th century, in so far as they relate to the doctrine of justification, appear in a new light: The teaching of the Lutheran churches presented in this Declaration does not fall under the condemnations from the Council of Trent. The condemnations in the Lutheran Confessions do not apply to the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church presented in this Declaration (JD §41).
    [Show full text]
  • Luthers Vermächtnis an Regensburg
    Luthers Vermächtnis an Regensburg Von Günter Schlichting GLIEDERUNG Einleitung 50 I. Die Saat 50 1. Luthers erster Brief nach Regensburg (23. 12. 1519) 50 2. Luthers Schriften in Regensburg 51 3. Grünwalder Konferenz und Regensburger Konvent 52 II. Das Wachstum 53 1. Luthers zweiter Brief nach Regensburg (26. 8.1523) 53 2. Der Bauernkrieg und Luthers dritter Brief nach Regensburg (8.5.1525) . 54 a) Der Bauernkrieg 54 b) Luthers dritter Brief nach Regensburg (8. 5. 1525) 54 c) Die Zwei-Reiche-Lehre 55 3. Die Wiedertäufer 56 a) Thomas Münzer 56 b) Der erste Vorstoß der Wiedertäufer 56 c) Vier Reichstage 57 d) Der zweite Vorstoß der Wiedertäufer und Luthers vierter Brief nach Regensburg (30. 6. 1534) 58 III. Die Entscheidung 59 1. Der Regensburger Reichstag 1541 59 a) Die Lage 59 b) Das erste Regensburger Religionsgespräch 59 c) Die Lebensfrage 61 d) Die Konkordienfrage 62 e) Der Fall Drach 63 2. Die Einführung der Reformation in Regensburg 63 a) Die Regensburger Reformation 63 b) Luthers fünfter Brief nach Regensburg (27. 11. 1542) 64 c) Luthers Zeugnis für Noppus (15. 10. 1543) 65 IV. Ausklang 65 Das zweite Regensburger Religionsgespräch 1546 65 Schluß 68 Abkürzungen, Quellen, Literatur 68 Universitätsbibliothek Historischer Verein für Regensburg urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-ubr03308-0049-0 Oberpfalz und Regensburg Einleitung: Ohne die Gestalt und das Werk D. Martin Luthers ist die Geschichte Regensburgs vom 16. bis zum 20. Jahrhundert nicht zu verstehen. Bei der Er• forschung der neueren Geschichte Regensburgs ist daher immer auch darauf zu achten, wie die Stimme Luthers in Regensburg aufgenommen wurde.
    [Show full text]
  • Conciliators of the Reformation Thesis
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Conciliators of the Reformation Thesis How to cite: Hewer, Christopher T (1987). Conciliators of the Reformation. The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 1987 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000f7da Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk UNR^TRlCnm Conciliators of the Reformation The Revd. Christopher T. R. Hewer, L.G.S.M., Dip. Lit. Arch., P.G.C.E. Religious Studies B. Phil. March 1987 Oeda of 5vJom.i5sot: matxKi i w ©ate of dovmibef HST- ProQ uest Number: 27919395 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. in the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 27919395 Published by ProQuest LLC (2020). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. Ail Rights Reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Heroes of the Great Reformation
    Great Heroes (and Antiheroes) of the Great Reformation Unit 6: The Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation Cardinal Gasparo St. Ignatius de Loyola Contarini (1483—1542) (1491—1556) Reformation and Divisions in the 16th-Century Roman Catholic Church • Protestant Reformers (Luther, Melanchthon, Zwingli, Calvin, Knox, Bucer, Bullinger, Cranmer, etc.) • Roman Catholic Evangelicals • Society of Jesus (Jesuits) • Council of Trent (1545—1547; 1551—1552; 1562—1563) • Papacy • Revival in the Religious Orders • New Spirituality (Mystics) • Extra-European Roman Catholic Expansion The Roman Catholic Evangelicals • Most, strongly affected by Augustine, mostly agreed with the Reformers’ doctrine of justification by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. • Disagreed with the Reformers’ break from allegiance to the papacy. • Mixed on Eucharist (transubstantiation vs. consubstantiation vs. spiritual presence vs. pure symbol) and other liturgical matters. • Agreed with Reformers’ pursuit of moral reform. • Worked 1521—1541 “to reform the Church of Rome from within, towards a more Biblical theology and practice, and thus to win back the Protestants into the one true Church.” (Needham) • Key figures: Johann von Staupitz, Gasparo Contarini, Juan de Valdes, Albert Pighius, Jacob Sadoleto, Gregorio Cortese, Reginald Pole, Johann Gropper, Girolamo Seripando, Giovanni Morone • 1537, issued Consilium de Emendanda Ecclesia (“Consultation on Reforming the Church”)—forthright condemnation of the moral state of the Roman Church; pope refused to publish it; leaked out; spread rapidly; Roman Inquisition placed it on “Index of Forbidden Books” Leading Roman Catholic Evangelicals • Johannes von Staupitz (1460—1524), Luther’s spiritual guide in Augustinian order; agreed with almost all Luther’s doctrine but couldn’t break with papacy; yet all Staupitz’s writings were placed on Rome’s “index of forbidden books” in 1563.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquariaat De Roo
    The REFORMATION and the Dutch Second Reformation A sales-catalogue from the entire private library of Prof. dr. W. van ‘t Spijker presented by Antiquariaat De Roo The REFORMATION and the Dutch Second Reformation Dear clients and fellow book lovers, We are very pleased to be able to present you our new catalogue on Reformation and the Dutch Second Reformation. This catalogue which holds a number of 57 items is for the greater part compiled from the entire private library of old and rare books of Prof. dr. Willem van ‘t Spijker. Van ‘t Spijker is emeritus professor of church history at the Theological University of Apeldoorn in the Netherlands, author of numerous books and a widely respected Reformation-scholar. His library consisted of many rare works by Reformers, their opponents and successors and presents a unique insight in the sixteenth century key movement in Western Christianity called the Reformation. If you have any questions please don’t hesitate to ask. Kind regards, Bart de Roo & Nancy Schot All items listed in this Catalogue are complete and in good condition, unless stated otherwise. Prices are in EUROS, (€). For multiple images of the books presented, please visit our website www.derooboeken.nl Items on the covers: 11387 BRENZ, Johannes Breuis & perspicua explicatio Psalmorum Dauidis. & 11421 RIVET, André Opervm Theologicorum. Antiquariaat De Roo Van Meelstraat 12 3331 KR Zwijndrecht - Fine bindings The Netherlands - Theology +31 (0)78 6124081 - (Church) History www.derooboeken.nl - Hand-coloured works [email protected] - Globes 11379 AMES, William Bellarminvs Enervatvs a Gvilielmo Amesio S.S. Theologiae Doctore in Academia Franekerana.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grammar of Justification: the Doctrines of Peter Martyr Vermigli and John Henry Newman and Their Ecumenical Implications
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Castaldo, Christopher A. (2015) The grammar of justification: the doctrines of Peter Martyr Vermigli and John Henry Newman and their ecumenical implications. PhD thesis, Middlesex University / London School of Theology. [Thesis] Final accepted version (with author’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/15772/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Fear and Consolation
    Fear and Consolation Peter Canisius and the Spirituality of Dying and Death +,/0$503$%(/ 635,1* STUDIES is a product of the Seminar on Jesuit Spirituality. This Seminar is composed of a group of Jesuits appointed from their provinces in the SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2013 United States. The Seminar studies topics pertaining to the spiritual doctrine and prac- U.S. JESUITS: tice of Jesuits, especially American Jesuits, and gathers current scholarly An annual subscription is provided by provinces of the U.S. Assistancy for studies pertaining to the history and ministries of Jesuits throughout the U.S. Jesuits living in the United States and U.S Jesuits who are still members world. It then disseminates the results through this journal. of a U.S. province but living outside the United States. The issues treated may be common also to Jesuits of other regions, oth- ALL OTHER SUBSCRIPTIONS: er priests, religious, and laity. Hence, the studies, while meant especially IRU$PHULFDQ-HVXLWVDUHQRWH[FOXVLYHO\IRUWKHP2WKHUVZKRPD\ÀQG Subscriptions to STUDIES: them helpful are cordially welcome to read them. U.S.: one-year, $20; two years, $38. Canada and Mexico: one year, $28; two years, $52 All other destinations: one year, $32; two years, $58 CURRENT MEMBERS OF THE SEMINAR *LIW&HUWLÀFDWHVDYDLODEOH Shay Auerbach, S.J., is pastor of Sacred Heart Parish, Richmond, Va. All payments must be in U.S. funds. (2011) CHANGE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION: Michael Barber, S.J., is dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at St. Louis University, St. Louis, Mo. (2010) -HVXLW6XEVFULEHUV<RXUSURYLQFHRIÀFHVKRXOGVHQGXV\RXUFKDQJHRIDG- dress; you need not do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernicus's Publication Strategy in the Contexts of Imperial and Papal Censorship and of Warmian Diplomatic Precedents
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Explore Bristol Research Blumenthal, G. J. (2016). Copernicus's publication strategy in the contexts of Imperial and Papal censorship and of Warmian diplomatic precedents. Science in Context, 29, 151-178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889716000016 Peer reviewed version License (if available): Unspecified Link to published version (if available): 10.1017/S0269889716000016 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Cambridge University Press at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889716000016 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms Vol. 29, no. 2 Copernicus’s Publication Strategy in the Contexts of Imperial and Papal Censorship and of Warmian Diplomatic Precedents Geoffrey Blumenthal University of Bristol E-mail address: [email protected] Argument The main thesis of this paper is that Copernicus’s avoidance of all admission that scripture was contravened in De revolutionibus and his composition of its new Preface in 1542, as well as the non- publication of Rheticus’s Treatise on Holy Scripture and the Motion of the Earth, were influenced by the early information they received on the failure of the 1541 Regensburg Protestant-Catholic colloquy, among the major consequences of which were significant increases in the problems concerning publishing works which contravened scripture.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Interim of Augsburg Until the Treaty of Augsburg (1548–1555)
    Violet Soen From the Interim of Augsburg until the Treaty of Augsburg (1548–1555) Although the time span in this chapter only consists of a brief eight-year period be- tween 1548 and 1555, this represented an important historical moment in which Eu- rope underwent a significant transformation. In 1548, Emperor Charles V felt confi- dent enough to force an Interim upon the Diet of the Holy Roman Empire, the traditional assembly of estates then gathered in Augsburg. With this temporary ar- rangement, as its name implied, the Emperor made provisions for the full Catholic reconversion of the Empire and the reform of the Church, while he also tried to satisfy the Lutheran party in an effort to restore peace and order after the religious turmoil of the preceding years. As such, the Interim was only to last “until the Church would be united again.” During this Augsburg Diet of 1548, Charles V certainly acted proac- tively, encouraged by his victory in Mühlberg over the Protestant Schmalkaldic Lea- gue on April 24, 1547, a moment famously captured in Titian’s equestrian portrait of the Emperor. Some biographers have therefore seen in the Interim a very personal and zealous document, a testimony to the Religionspolitik of the triumphant Emper- or, while others have claimed that it was nothing more than a Pyrrhic victory.¹ When the same Diet met in the same city of Augsburg eight years later in 1555, a depressed Charles V remained in Brussels, where he decided that he would rather abdicate than sign off on the further concessions that his brother was then negoti- ating with the Protestant party.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernicus's Publication Strategy in the Contexts of Imperial and Papal Censorship and of Warmian Diplomatic Precedents
    Blumenthal, G. J. (2016). Copernicus's publication strategy in the contexts of Imperial and Papal censorship and of Warmian diplomatic precedents. Science in Context, 29, 151-178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889716000016 Peer reviewed version License (if available): Unspecified Link to published version (if available): 10.1017/S0269889716000016 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Cambridge University Press at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889716000016 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Vol. 29, no. 2 Copernicus’s Publication Strategy in the Contexts of Imperial and Papal Censorship and of Warmian Diplomatic Precedents Geoffrey Blumenthal University of Bristol E-mail address: [email protected] Argument The main thesis of this paper is that Copernicus’s avoidance of all admission that scripture was contravened in De revolutionibus and his composition of its new Preface in 1542, as well as the non- publication of Rheticus’s Treatise on Holy Scripture and the Motion of the Earth, were influenced by the early information they received on the failure of the 1541 Regensburg Protestant-Catholic colloquy, among the major consequences of which were significant increases in the problems concerning publishing works which contravened scripture.
    [Show full text]