Ngarimu Heights.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ngarimu Heights.Indd Archaeological investigation of sites T12/172 and T12/173, Pt Whakatete No 3 Block, Ngarimu Heights, Thames Coast report to The New Zealand Historic Places Trust and Ngarimu Heights Ltd. Andrew Hoffmann CFG Heritage Ltd. 7 Plunket Terrace Hamilton ph. (07) 856 4877 [email protected] Archaeological investigation of sites T12/172 and T12/173, Pt Whakatete No 3 Block, Ngarimu Heights, Thames Coast report to The New Zealand Historic Places Trust and Ngarimu Heights Ltd. Prepared by: Andrew Hoff mann Reviewed by: Date: 26 February 2008 Matthew Campbell Reference: 2008/24 © CFG Heritage Ltd. 2008 CFG Heritage Ltd. 7 Plunket Terrace Hamilton ph. (07) 856 4877 [email protected] Archaeological investigation of sites T12/172 and T12/173, Pt Whakatete No 3 Block, Ngarimu Heights, Thames Coast Andrew Hoff mann Th e excavation of sites T12/172 and T12/173 at the Ngarimu developed bays, harbours and estuaries are present along Heights subdivision, Th ames, Pt Whakatete No 3 Block, with expanses of fl at to moderately sloping coastal land. was carried out over seven days between 28 June and 4 July At Ngarimu Bay a minor coastal platform has devel- 2007. Th is investigation was carried out under authority oped and the coastal relief across the seaward portion of No.2006/190 issued by New Zealand Historic Places Trust the block is more moderate than over most of the adjacent under section 14 of the Historic Places Act 1993. coastline. From State Highway 25 the terrain of the north Both sites were initially recorded by Larryn Diamond west portion of the block rises moderately in an easterly in 1977 as part of a larger archaeological survey of the direction until reaching the toes of two ridges. Manuka Th ames−Manaia Coast (Diamond 1981). Th ey were and kowhai cover the slopes of both ridgelines. Th e major- identifi ed as exposures of midden deposits on the slopes ity of No 3 Block has been cleared in the past and was of the two spur ridges located in this block. Along with under long grass at the time of this investigation. A minor these midden deposits Gumbley (2005) identifi ed terraces ephemeral creek runs through a steep gully in approxi- at T12/172. Much of that site, however, spans the No 3 mately the centre of the block separating the two ridges. Block’s southern boundary and only the low terrace por- Th e Pupurakau Stream is a perennial watercourse and tion of this site was subject to the current investigation. marks the eastern boundary of No 3 Block. Large stream At T12/173 Gumbley (2005) also identifi ed a rectangular boulders and quantities of smaller rubble are present in pit on the spur crest and a large fl at natural slip terrace the topsoil adjacent the stream, indicating this lower lying forming the terminus of the spur was thought to preserve area has been subject to fl ood events in the past. Evidence other archaeological features. Th e entirety of site T12/173 of slips are also visible above the toes of the two ridges. is within the Pt Whakatete No 3 Block and was investi- T12/172 gated in whole. As a result, the bulk of this report relates to the investigation of T12/173. Diamond identifi ed two Th e toe of the ridge line on which T12/172 was located further midden sites in No 3 Block, T12/171 and T12/174. rises from the south west corner of No 3 Block, south of Th e former was described as a midden deposit damaged the ephemeral creek line (see Figure 2). Th e slopes of this by tree root growth in 1977. Th is site was not re-located by ridge rise to the south east and the majority of the terraces Gumbley in 2005. T12/174, located on the south bank of and possible pit features associated with this site lie above the Pupurakau Stream, was identifi ed by Gumbley but was 20 m ASL, on the crest of the ridge beyond the block’s considered to be a part of T12/173 (Gumbley 2005) and is southern boundary line. Th e part of T12/172 that was reported as such here. investigated lay between 10 and 15 m ASL, just above the Middens, oft en associated with pits and terraces as toe of the ridge. Two terraced areas were investigated, des- at T12/172 and T12/173, are the most common class of ignated Areas F1 and F2 (note these terraces were labelled archaeological site along the Th ames Coast, and are also H and I respectively in Gumbley 2005). Area F2 is a terrace a common site type across Coromandel Peninsula. Th e approximately 15 x 7 m, while Area F1 is a smaller terrace, investigation of T12/173 provided an opportunity to com- approximately 8 x 9 m, which lay immediately downhill pare the nature and chronology of the settlement of this from Area F2. ridge top site with similar excavated sites on the Peninsula T12/173 (Crosby et al. 1987; Furey 1987a, 1987b; Gumbley 1998; Leahy 1970, 1972; Phillips 1997). Site T12/173 is located on the crest of the ridge north of the ephemeral creek and south of the Pupurakau Stream. Environment and landscape Four areas were excavated, Areas A−D. Areas A, B and Th e sites were located at Ngarimu Bay approximately 7.5 C are located along the ridge crest between 35 and 50 m km north of Th ames, approximately halfway between ASL (see Figure 2). Area A is the uppermost part of the Tararu and Te Puru townships (Figure 1). Along this part site and lies along the fl at crest of the ridge. A single pit, of the Firth of Th ames the land generally slopes steeply measuring approximately 5 x 3 m prior to excavation, was down to the sea with little development of a coastal plat- visible on the ground at the northern end of Area A prior form. Th e largest areas of coastal fl ats are at Tararu and to excavation. Testing with a screw-type soil auger indi- Te Puru, where signifi cant alluvial fans have developed at cated the pit had 550 mm of fi ll in it. Th is was the only the mouths of the streams of the same names. Th is coastal visible surface feature, other than shell midden, visible environment contrasts with that present on the northern across the entire site prior to excavation. Area B was an and eastern side of the Coromandal Peninsula, where well approximately 15 m wide band of midden deposit covering Pt Whakatete No.3 Block Figure 1. Location of Pt Whakatete No 3 Block at Ngarimu Bay, Thames Coast. the slopes of the ridge below Area A. Area C was the fl at Area F2 and the fl at portion of Area F1 was completely slip terrace, approximately 10 m wide by 16 m long, situ- exposed. ated below Areas A and B. Th e Area D midden deposit is A self-tracking robotic total station (Leica 1205) was at approximately 15 m ASL at the toe of the ridge, adjacent used to plot the relative positions of each designated area the Pupurakau Stream fl ood plain. Th is was the part origi- and of the archaeological features identifi ed and excavated nally recorded by Diamond. Th e midden there was probed within them. A separate paper record of the dimensions and estimated to cover approximately 300 m2. and attributes of each feature was also kept. Th e locations of each stone fl ake were individually plotted on the survey Excavation method plan. Single obsidian fl akes were bagged and numbered A mechanical excavator was used to strip the turf from individually, while associated groups of fl akes were num- the excavated areas. Following topsoil stripping from bered and bagged as a group. Features were photographed each area the exposed surfaces were cleaned down using with a digital camera before, during and aft er excavation. hand tools (shovel and trowel). All potential features were Samples of the midden deposits in T12/173 Areas B marked and subsequently excavated by hand. Th e spatial and D were taken. In Area B, three 1 m squares were exca- extent of Areas A, B and C were chosen such that they cov- vated and a 10 litre sample was retained from each square. ered the terminal end crest of this ridge line, equating to In Area D, a single 1 m square was excavated and one 10 all land surfaces potentially suited to pre-European Maori litre sample was retained. During the excavation of these occupation. A 2 x 10 m trench was stripped across a por- sample squares, identifi able charcoal pieces were retained tion of Area D. A similar sized trench was stripped across and bagged separately. Th e 10 litre midden samples were wet sieved through 5 mm mesh and analysed and recorded. 2 Ngarimu Heights Pupurakau Stream ephemeral creek Figure 2. Investigated areas of T12/172 and T12/173 overlaid on topographic plan of Pt Whakatete No 3 Block. Shell and charcoal from the fl oor of the larger pit feature dence of any associated occupation across the slip terrace. in Area A were also retained. Th e charcoal samples were Area D was disturbed by recent dumping activities and analysed by Dr Rod Wallace (Anthropology Department, past river bank fl ood events. A single obsidian waste fl ake University of Auckland). A selection of the shells from the was recovered from T12/172 Area F1, and the investiga- 10 litre midden samples and from the pit feature were proc- tion of Areas F1 and F2 revealed no features related to pre- essed and radiocarbon dated by the Waikato Radiocarbon European occupation.
Recommended publications
  • TCDC Camping Brochure 2018 WEB
    The complete guide to camping on the Coromandel Places to stay, the rules and handy tips for visitors www.tcdc.govt.nz/camping www.thecoromandel.com Contents 4 Where to stay (paid campgrounds) Where can I camp? See our list of campsites and contact information for bookings. For more on camping in New Zealand visit www.camping.org.nz 6-8 DOC Campgrounds Details on where the Department of Conservation 16-17 Public toilets and provides paid campgrounds. dump stations 9 DOC Freedom Camping Policy Read these pages for locations of public toilets Details on locations where DOC has prohibited or and dump stations where you can empty your restricted freedom camping. campervan wastewater. 10-12 TCDC Freedom Camping Guidelines 18 Coromandel Road Map We welcome responsible freedom camping. Don’t Roads in the Coromandel can be winding, narrow risk a $200 fine by not following the rules and and there are quite a few one-lane bridges. There reading the signage where freedom camping is can be limits on where you can take a rental vehicle, allowed or prohibited. Freedom camping is only so check with your rental company. permitted in Thames-Coromandel District in certified self-contained vehicles. 19 Information Centres Visit our seven information centres or check out 14-15 What to do with your rubbish www.thecoromandel.com for ideas on what to do, and recycling what to see and how to get there. Drop your rubbish and recycling off at our Refuse Transfer Stations or rubbish compactors. We’ve 20 Contact us listed the locations and provided a map showing Get in touch if you have where they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Wharekawa Coast 2120 Coastal Processes and Hazards
    Wharekawa Coast 2120 Coastal Processes and Hazards Draft report prepared for Waikato Regional Council 26 June 2020 Dr Terry M. Hume Note: This draft report has yet to undergo external peer review. It has been provided as a background paper to inform Wharekawa Coast 2120 Community Workshops, Technical Advisory Group, Joint Working Party and Community Advisory Panel activities. 1 Contents Executive summary 3 1. Introduction 7 2. Background 11 3. Coastal setting and hazard drivers 13 3.1 Geomorphology 3.2 Water levels Astronomical tide Storm surge Storm tides Wave runup and setup Rivers 3.3 Long term sea levels 3.4 Currents and circulation 3.5 Winds 3.6 Waves 3.7 Sediment sources and transport 3.8 Shoreline change 3.9 Vertical land movement 3.10 Human influences on coastal processes 3.11 Climate change and sea level rise 4. Coastal hazards 40 4.1 Coastal inundation Historical coastal inundation events Future potential for coastal inundation events Effects of climate change and sea level rise 4.2 Coastal erosion Shoreline change Coastal erosion processes Effects of climate change and sea level rise 4.3 Tsunami Modelling the tsunami threat Effects of climate change and sea level rise 5. Strategies to mitigate coastal hazards and inform adaptive planning 59 5.1 Predicting hazard events 5.2 Coastal inundation 5.3 Coastal erosion 5.4 Tsunami 5.5 Multi-hazard assessment 5.6 Mangroves – a potential means of hazard mitigation? 5.7 Monitoring and predicting forcing processes 5.8 Documenting coastal hazard events 5.9 Input from citizen science 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Coromandel Harbour the COROMANDEL There Are Many Beautiful Places in the World, Only a Few Can Be Described As Truly Special
    FREE OFFICIAL VISITOR GUIDE www.thecoromandel.com Coromandel Harbour THE COROMANDEL There are many beautiful places in the world, only a few can be described as truly special. With a thousand natural hideaways to enjoy, gorgeous beaches, dramatic rainforests, friendly people and fantastic fresh food The Coromandel experience is truly unique and not to be missed. The Coromandel, New Zealanders’ favourite destination, is within an hour and a half drive of the major centres of Auckland and Hamilton and their International Airports, and yet the region is a world away from the hustle and bustle of city life. Drive, sail or fly to The Coromandel and bunk down on nature’s doorstep while catching up with locals who love to show you why The Coromandel is good for your soul. CONTENTS Regional Map 4 - 5 Our Towns 6 - 15 Our Region 16 - 26 Walks 27 - 32 3 On & Around the Water 33 - 40 Other Activities 41 - 48 Homegrown Cuisine 49 - 54 Tours & Transport 55 - 57 Accommodation 59 - 70 Events 71 - 73 Local Radio Stations 74 DISCLAIMER: While all care has been taken in preparing this publication, Destination Coromandel accepts no responsibility for any errors, omissions or the offers or details of operator listings. Prices, timetables and other details or terms of business may change without notice. Published Oct 2015. Destination Coromandel PO Box 592, Thames, New Zealand P 07 868 0017 F 07 868 5986 E [email protected] W www.thecoromandel.com Cover Photo: Northern Coromandel CAPE COLVILLE Fletcher Bay PORT JACKSON Stony Bay The Coromandel ‘Must Do’s’ MOEHAU RANG Sandy Bay Fantail Bay Cathedral Cove PORT CHARLES Hot Water Beach E The Pinnacles Karangahake Gorge Waik New Chum Beach Otautu Bay Hauraki Rail Trail Gold Discovery COLVILLE plus so much more..
    [Show full text]
  • Coromandel Local Walks Guide Welcome to the Coromandel
    YOUR Coromandel LOCAL WALKS GUIDE Welcome to The Coromandel ‘A walk in the park’, we say, when we want to infer that something is easy, effortless. Indeed, how good does it feel to inhale the fresh Coromandel air and clear the mind with an easily accessed walk? Unlike the spectacular hikes in mountainous terrain managed by DOC, the walks mapped in this booklet are largely on TCDC land, with a few exceptions where walks lead to DOC tracks or traverse sections of private land, for which we are grateful to the owners and ask you to be respectful. Taking in harbour and river margins, local heritage, playgrounds and playing fields, busy working wharves and along sandy beaches and coastal headlands, there is something for every level of fitness and plenty of treasures along the way. The walks are unique, usually for a couple of hours or less duration and vary in the degree of difficulty - but they offer something wonderful just the same. This collection of walks was put together by a member of our Communications Team with input from our parks and reserves staff who work closely with the fantastic volunteers on our Reserve Groups. We also worked with friendly, knowledgeable staff at Waikato Regional Council, local heritage enthusiasts and others in the community who just love to walk. View the icons as listed to see which walks are suitable for those with prams, dogs or requiring wheelchair access and please note, some areas do not allow for dog walking during dotterel breeding season or peak summer. You can also find out more about our future plans for walks around the Coromandel by going to www.tcdc.govt.nz/corogreatwalks We welcome your thoughts and hope you enjoy making time for yourself with a good walk on the Coromandel - any time of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • TCDC Community Study Report Thames 11-6-10
    TCDC Heritage Review Project Coromandel Peninsula Community Board Heritage Study - Thames - Dr Ann McEwan Heritage Consultancy Services Hamilton 11 June 2010 Executive Summary This study is intended to assist the Thames-Coromandel District Council in its forthcoming review of the District Plan. Historic heritage recommendations specific to the Thames Community Board area are provided here for consideration by the Council and discussion by local iwi and other members of the community. This report should be read in conjunction with the Coromandel Peninsula Thematic History and Consultant’s Summary Recommendation Report (2010), also prepared by Heritage Consultancy Services. In them a thematic approach has been taken to compiling historical information in a format that is best suited to identifying and interpreting historic heritage resources in the district. The principal recommendation made within this report is that the historic heritage resources of Thames and surrounding areas should be protected, actively managed and interpreted by the council on behalf of the community. Whilst scheduling of some historic buildings, sites and places on the District Plan is desirable, heritage values can also be conserved on council reserves and the DoC estate. The history of the locality may also be recorded and disseminated by the Thames Library, in partnership with The Treasury and The Coromandel Heritage Trust. Historic heritage resources in the area can be enhanced or undermined by new development, whether undertaken by the council or private landowners. It is therefore desirable that the history of the area is promoted within council and throughout the wider community in order that the future of local area settlements and their environs is based on an understanding of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Kauaeranga Valley and Broken Hills Brochure And
    COROMANDEL Contents Kauaeranga valley recreation 2 Further information Kauaeranga valley Kauaeranga valley area map 6 Track information is correct at date of Introduction 7 printing but facilities and services can and Broken Hills Location map 7 change. Check with the Kauaeranga Enjoying the outdoors safely 9 Visitor Centre. Kauaeranga short walks 10 Department of Conservation Kauaeranga walking tracks 11 Kauaeranga Visitor Centre Kauaeranga tramping tracks 15 PO Box 343, Thames 3540 Other activities 18 PHONE: (+64) 7 867 9080 Huts 19 EMAIL: [email protected] Camping 21 Please remember 23 www.doc.govt.nz Kauri dams 24 Broken Hills recreation 25 Introduction 25 Please remember 27 Broken Hills area map 29 Track guide 31 Wildlife 34 Further information Back page Cover image: Cookson Kauri. All photos: DOC unless stated otherwise Published by: Department of Conservation Kauaeranga Visitor Centre PO Box 343 Thames 3540 October 2019 Editing and design: DOC Creative Services Conservation House, Wellington This publication is produced using paper sourced from well-managed, renewable and legally logged forests. 9 421005 171273 > R162522 Kauaeranga Visitor Centre. 1 2 3 to Tapu Coroglen Road to Rangihau roadend KauaerangaKauaeranga valley Valley walking walking andand trampingtramping ttracksracks T A P Waiomu Kauri Grove U Waiomu S U M M W IT AIO TO MU T C RACK R O S B Dam IE Moss Creek S H M U O T 720m S Main Kauaeranga C O R O M A N D E L F O R E S T P A R K S Dam ACK C TR R U E R E U Dancing Camp P K E T Dam T Te Puru R A Crosbies Hut
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Memories and Sharing Moments #Goodforyoursoul
    FREE OFFICIAL VISITOR GUIDE FREE OFFICIAL VISITOR GUIDE Creating memories and sharing moments #goodforyoursoul Find them here www.thecoromandel.com www.thecoromandel.com www.thecoromandel.com Photo: @iamtheflyingkiwi : Whangamata KEY DRIVING TIMES & DISTANCES Marine Reserve Walks Golf Course Gold Heritage Fishing Information Centres Surfing Cycleway Airports Kauri Heritage Camping Fletcher Bay CAPE COLVILLE Thames Coromandel Whitianga Hahei/Hotwater Tairua Pauanui Whangamata Waihi Paeroa PORT JACKSON COASTAL WALKWAY KMS TIME KMS TIME KMS TIME KMS TIME KMS TIME KMS TIME KMS TIME KMS TIME KMS TIME Stony Bay Thames 54 1.00 93 1.30 92 1.30 49 0.45 51 0.45 59 0.45 54 1.00 33 0.35 MOEHAU RANG Sandy Bay Coromandel 54 1.00 46 1.00 83 1.35 82 1.20 113 2.00 1.29 2.15 108 2.00 87 1.35 Fantail Bay Whitianga 93 1.30 46 1.00 37 0.35 40 0.35 67 1.00 82 1.15 110 2.00 160 2.00 PORT CHARLES Hahei/Hotwater 92 1.30 83 1.35 37 0.35 25 0.25 45 0.45 59 1.00 88 1.40 110 2.00 E Tairua 49 0.45 82 1.20 40 0.35 25 0.25 25 0.20 36 0.35 66 1.00 68 1.10 Pauanui 51 0.45 113 2.00 67 1.00 45 0.45 25 0.20 40 0.30 69 1.00 84 1.00 Waikawau Bay Whangamata 59 0.45 129 2.15 82 1.15 59 1.00 36 0.35 40 0.30 29 0.40 49 0.45 Otautu Bay Waihi 54 1.00 108 2.00 110 2.00 88 1.40 66 1.00 69 1.00 29 0.40 21 0.25 Paeroa 33 0.35 87 1.35 160 2.00 110 2.00 68 1.10 84 1.00 49 0.45 21 0.25 COLVILLE Auckland 115 1.30 169 2.30 208 3.00 207 3.00 152 2.00 166 2.00 165 2.00 136 2.00 115 1.30 Tauranga 116 2.00 257 3.00 172 3.00 208 3.30 126 2.00 152 1.00 89 1.15 83 1.00 104 1.25 Amodeo Bay Hamilton 109 1.33 163 2.20 181 2.35 180 2.35 145 2.00 137 1.57 126 2.00 98 1.23 77 1.05 Kennedy Bay NOTE: Driving times vary depending on the routes taken.
    [Show full text]
  • National and Regional Risk Exposure in Low-Lying Coastal Areas Areal Extent, Population, Buildings and Infrastructure
    National and regional risk exposure in low-lying coastal areas Areal extent, population, buildings and infrastructure Prepared for the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment October 2015 Prepared by : R.G. Bell R. Paulik S. Wadwha For any information regarding this report please contact: Rob Bell Programme Leader: Hazards & Risk Coastal & Estuarine Processes +64-7-856 1742 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2015-006 Report date: October 2015 NIWA Project: PCE15201 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Michael Allis (Coastal Engineer) Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Dr Sam Dean (Chief Scientist) © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thames-Coromandel Shoreline Management Plan Governance and Community Engagement Workshop Memo Information
    Thames-Coromandel Shoreline Management Plan Governance and Community Engagement Workshop Memo In formation TO Thames-Coromandel District Council FROM Jan van der Vliet – TCDC Coastal Engineer DATE 9 May 2019 SUBJECT Thames-Coromandel Shoreline Management Plan Governance and Community Engagement Workshop 1 Purpose of report To inform a Thames-Coromandel Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) Governance and Community Engagement Workshop with Council Members aimed at: a. obtaining Member support for the approach proposed for Phase 1 engagement with the community and mana whenua; and b. seeking Member views on the criteria to be adopted for the SMP risk assessment process. 2 Background Coastal Activity Since 2017 Coastal Activity has become an increasingly prominent component of the Council’s operations and strategic planning. In June 2018 the Council adopted the Thames- Coromandel Coastal Management Strategy which set out the problem, the context for and the challenge of coastal climate adaptation. It also set out goals, objectives and actions to support the sustainable management of natural and physical coastal resources, now and for future generations. In August 2018, Council approved the Coastal Hazards Policy that set out the objectives for risk management, levels of service and emergency events at the coast. This renewed focus and recognition of the risks posed by coastal hazards to Council and community activities has led to a significant budget allocation in the 2018 Long Term Plan for Coastal Activities, with a specific focus on the development of Shoreline Management Plans (SMPs) for the District. In April 2019, Council appointed a consortium led by Royal HaskoningDHV, including the Coastal Management Collective (CMC), Streamlined and EMM Consulting, to prepare the Thames-Coromandel District-wide SMPs over a three-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Coromandel Beaches: Coastal Hazards and Development Setback Recommendations
    Environment Waikato Technical Report 02/06 Coromandel Beaches: Coastal Hazards and Development Setback Recommendations Prepared by: Jim Dahm Adam Munro For: Environment Waikato PO Box 4010 HAMILTON EAST ISSN: 1172-4005 April 2002 Document prepared by Environment Waikato and Coastline Consultants. Peer reviewed by Dr Terry Hume, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, and Associate Professor Patrick Hesp, Massey University, Palmerston North. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V Purpose of Report v Methods v Eastern Coromandel v Western Coromandel vii Implications for Hazard Management viii 1 BACKGROUND 1 1.1 Purpose of Report 1 1.2 Objectives 2 1.3 Review Process for Coastal Development Setbacks 3 1.4 Statutory Requirements 3 1.5 Structure of Report 5 2 METHODS 5 2.1 Investigations of Holocene Beach Development 5 2.1.1 Coring and radiocarbon dating of Holocene dunes 5 2.1.2 Dune morphology 7 2.2 Investigations of Shoreline Change 7 2.2.1 Terminology used for shoreline changes in this report 8 2.2.2 Mapping of historical shorelines 8 2.2.3 Beach profiling 10 2.2.4 Other information on shoreline change 10 2.3 Coastal Flooding 11 2.3.1 Compilation of historical newspaper reports 11 2.3.2 Other sources of information 12 3 EASTERN COROMANDEL 12 3.1 General Background 12 3.2 Holocene Beach and Dune Sedimentation 13 3.2.1 Moderate-large barrier systems 13 3.2.2 Pocket beaches 30 3.3 Shoreline Changes 36 3.3.1 Long-term trends and dynamic equilibrium 36 3.3.2 Shoreline mapping 37 3.3.3 Beach Profile Data 67 3.3.4 Other
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Thames and Thames Coast Reserves: Management Plan
    Draft Thames and Thames Coast Reserves: Management Plan July 2019 Purpose of this plan The Reserves Act (1977) requires that Thames-Coromandel District Council (the Council), as an administering body, prepare this management plan (Section 41). Reserves Act management plans are an important reserve management tool. These management plans are developed in consultation with reserve users, community and key stakeholder groups, with consideration to current and future management of a reserve. A management plan will provide for continuity between legislative requirements, council plans and policies, and the day-to-day operation of a reserve. This draft Thames and Thames Coast Reserves Management Plan applies to all reserves in the Thames and Thames Coast area administered by Thames-Coromandel District Council that are covered by the Reserves Act 1977. Process of preparing this reserve management plan, in accordance with the Reserves Act 1977: Council invites suggestions on reserve management objectives and policies Council approves draft Thames and Thames Coast Reserves: Management Plan for public consultation Council calls for submissions on the draft Thames and Thames Coast Reserves: Management Plan Hearings Council adopts the Thames and Thames Coast Reserves: Management Plan Public Consultation on this draft plan Public consultation on this plan will be undertaken from 12 July 2019 to 6 September 2019. Submission Process If you wish to make a submission to this draft Thames and Thames Coast Reserves: Management Plan, you can: Complete a submission form online at www.tcdc.govt.nz/Have-Your-Say-RMP Send Council an email to [email protected] Send a written submission to – Thames and Thames Coast Reserve Management Plan Review, Thames-Coromandel District Council, Private Bag1001, Thames 3540 Or send a fax to 07 868 0234.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Tourism in the Coromandel
    CHAIRMAN’S report The importance of the visitor industry’s contribution to regional GDP is becoming more widely understood throughout New Zealand, and so too is the challengeLEADING to deliver TOURISM visitor spend equal IN to, or above, the equivalent national measure for our region. Destination Coromandel’s core business is destination marketing, and the focus continues to be directed towards the domestic market. At $250 million theThe domestic Coromandel market makes up 80% of the visitor spend in our region. The Coromandel is also enjoying growth in international spend, beyond the national measure. This year we launched a 10 year plan to grow visitor spend in line with national aspirations of Towards 2025. Product development, seasonality and quality were deemed the three points of focus that would help The Coromandel achieve its vision while also providing an efficient return on investment to our stakeholders. From an organisational perspective, taking time to improve the structure and reporting requirements will allow more time in the market place to lead discussions with our stakeholders on issues that will have a true impact on our key performance indicators, and ultimately help drive visitation to The Coromandel. In committing funds for the next three years our key stakeholders, Thames Coromandel District Council and Hauraki District Council, demonstrated confidence in results achieved and a desire to grow tourism’s economic contribution to The Coromandel. Brent Page Chairman Karangahake Gorge DESTINATION COROMANDEL Annual Report
    [Show full text]