DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Rights Monitoring Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Rights Monitoring Group FACILITATING INTERNATIONAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE THROUGH INTERVENTION Human Rights Monitoring Group Monitoring Group Members Teresa Donnelly (Chair) Robert Evans Julian Falconer Avvy Go Judith Potter Heather Ross Joanne St. Lewis February 2017 .................................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 11 THE MANDATE OF THE MONITORING GROUP ........................................................ 12 THE UNITED NATIONS’ FOCUS ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE ...................................... 13 OVERVIEW OF GLOBAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE TRENDS ........................................ 14 Lawyers ......................................................................................................................... 15 Representing clients who are vulnerable because of their religion, ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, sex/gender, sexual orientation, etc. ....................................... 15 China ...................................................................................................................... 16 Chen Guangcheng ............................................................................................. 16 Gao Zhisheng ..................................................................................................... 16 Ni Yulan .............................................................................................................. 17 Shu Xiangxin ...................................................................................................... 18 Tang Jingling ...................................................................................................... 18 Zhang Kai ........................................................................................................... 19 Lawyers Providing Legal Aid .............................................................................. 19 Large Group of Human Rights Lawyers ............................................................. 20 Colombia ................................................................................................................ 23 José Humberto Torres ........................................................................................ 23 William Cristancho Duarte .................................................................................. 24 The Democratic Republic of the Congo ................................................................. 24 Jean Kisumbule Muteba ..................................................................................... 24 Egypt ...................................................................................................................... 25 Mahienour El-Massry .......................................................................................... 25 Greece ................................................................................................................... 26 Electra Koutra ..................................................................................................... 26 Guatemala ............................................................................................................. 26 2 Ramón Cadena Rámila ...................................................................................... 26 Honduras ............................................................................................................... 28 Antonio Trejo Cabrera ........................................................................................ 28 Dionisio Diaz Garcia ........................................................................................... 28 Lawyers at Association for a More Just Society (“AMJS”) .................................. 28 India ....................................................................................................................... 29 Leitanthem Umakanta Meitei .............................................................................. 29 Indonesia ............................................................................................................... 30 Alldo Fellix Januardy .......................................................................................... 30 Gustaf Kawer ...................................................................................................... 31 Tigor Gempita Hutapea and Obed Sakti Andre Dominika .................................. 31 Iran ......................................................................................................................... 32 Farshid Yadollahi and Imprisoned Human Rights Lawyers ................................ 32 Hadi Esmaeilzadeh ............................................................................................. 32 Houtan Kian ........................................................................................................ 33 Iran’s Endangered Lawyers ................................................................................ 34 Maryam Karbasi, Maryam Kianersi and Sara (Hajar) Sabaghian ....................... 34 Narges Mohammadi ........................................................................................... 34 Nasrin Sotoudeh ................................................................................................. 35 Shadi Sadr .......................................................................................................... 36 Shirin Ebadi ........................................................................................................ 36 Kenya ..................................................................................................................... 37 Willie Kimani ....................................................................................................... 37 Kyrgyzstan ............................................................................................................. 37 Tahir Asanov ...................................................................................................... 37 Malaysia ................................................................................................................. 38 Hindraf Lawyers .................................................................................................. 38 Karpal Singh ....................................................................................................... 39 Nigeria .................................................................................................................... 39 Lawyers Providing Legal Services to LGBTI Clients ........................................... 39 Pakistan ................................................................................................................. 40 3 Bilal Anwar Kasi and Lawyers in Pakistan .......................................................... 40 Russia .................................................................................................................... 40 Vitaliy Moiseyev and Tatiana Akimtseva ............................................................ 40 Saudi Arabia .......................................................................................................... 41 Abdul Rahaman al-Lahem .................................................................................. 41 Sudan ..................................................................................................................... 42 Nabeel Adib Abdallah ......................................................................................... 42 Swaziland ............................................................................................................... 42 Thulani Rudolf Maseko ....................................................................................... 42 Turkey .................................................................................................................... 43 Filiz Kalayci......................................................................................................... 43 Muharrem Erbey ................................................................................................. 43 Lawyers Protesting ............................................................................................. 44 Vietnam .................................................................................................................. 45 Bui Thi Kim Thanh .............................................................................................. 45 Tran Thu Nam and Le Luan................................................................................ 45 Challenging Government Actions on Behalf of Groups or Human Rights Organisations ............................................................................................................ 46 Algeria .................................................................................................................... 46 Amine Sidhoum Abderramane and Hassiba Boumerdesi ................................... 46 Argentina ................................................................................................................ 47 Alberto Nisman ................................................................................................... 47 China ...................................................................................................................... 48 Guo Feixiong (aka Yang Maodong) ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABILITY CIES 2019 San Francisco • April 14-18, 2019 ANNUAL CONFERENCE PROGRAM RD 6 3
    EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY CIES 2019 San Francisco • April 14-18, 2019 ANNUAL CONFERENCE PROGRAM RD 6 3 #CIES2019 | #Ed4Sustainability www.cies.us SUN MON TUE WED THU 14 15 16 17 18 GMT-08 8 AM Session 1 Session 5 Session 10 Session 15 8 - 9:30am 8 - 9:30am 8 - 9:30am 8 - 9:30am 9 AM Coffee Break, 9:30am Coffee Break, 9:30am Coffee Break, 9:30am Coffee Break, 9:30am 10 AM Pre-conference Workshops 1 Session 2 Session 6 Session 11 Session 16 10am - 1pm 10 - 11:30am 10 - 11:30am 10 - 11:30am 10 - 11:30am 11 AM 12 AM Plenary Session 1 Plenary Session 2 Plenary Session 3 (includes Session 17 11:45am - 1:15pm 11:45am - 1:15pm 2019 Honorary Fellows Panel) 11:45am - 1:15pm 11:45am - 1:15pm 1 PM 2 PM Session 3 Session 7 Session 12 Session 18 Pre-conference Workshops 2 1:30 - 3pm 1:30 - 3pm 1:30 - 3pm 1:30 - 3pm 1:45 - 4:45pm 3 PM Session 4 Session 8 Session 13 Session 19 4 PM 3:15 - 4:45pm 3:15 - 4:45pm 3:15 - 4:45pm 3:15 - 4:45pm Reception @ Herbst Theatre 5 PM (ticketed event) Welcome, 5pm Session 9 Session 14 Closing 4:30 - 6:30pm 5 - 6:30pm 5 - 6:30pm 5 - 6:30pm Town Hall: Debate 6 PM 5:30 - 7pm Keynote Lecture @ Herbst 7 PM Theatre (ticketed event) Presidential Address State of the Society Opening Reception 6:30 - 9pm 6:45 - 7:45pm 6:45 - 7:45pm 7 - 9pm 8 PM Awards Ceremony Chairs Appreciation (invite only) 7:45 - 8:30pm 7:45 - 8:45pm 9 PM Institutional Receptions Institutional Receptions 8:30 - 9:45pm 8:30 - 9:45pm TABLE of CONTENTS CIES 2019 INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL INTEREST Conference Theme .
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Participation in the Arab Uprisings: a Struggle for Justice
    Distr. LIMITED E/ESCWA/SDD/2013/Technical Paper.13 26 December 2013 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR WESTERN ASIA (ESCWA) WOMEN AND PARTICIPATION IN THE ARAB UPRISINGS: A STRUGGLE FOR JUSTICE New York, 2013 13-0381 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper constitutes part of the research conducted by the Social Participatory Development Section within the Social Development Division to advocate the principles of social justice, participation and citizenship. Specifically, the paper discusses the pivotal role of women in the democratic movements that swept the region three years ago and the challenges they faced in the process. The paper argues that the increased participation of women and their commendable struggle against gender-based injustices have not yet translated into greater freedoms or increased political participation. More critically, in a region dominated by a patriarchal mindset, violence against women has become a means to an end and a tool to exercise control over society. If the demands for bread, freedom and social justice are not linked to discourses aimed at achieving gender justice, the goals of the Arab revolutions will remain elusive. This paper was co-authored by Ms. Dina Tannir, Social Affairs Officer, and Ms. Vivienne Badaan, Research Assistant, and has benefited from the overall guidance and comments of Ms. Maha Yahya, Chief, Social Participatory Development Section. iii iv CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... iii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. GENDERING ARAB REVOLUTIONS: WHAT WOMEN WANT ......................... 2 A. The centrality of gender to Arab revolutions............................................................ 2 B. Participation par excellence: Activism among Arab women.................................... 3 III. CHANGING LANES: THE STRUGGLE OVER WOMEN’S BODIES .................
    [Show full text]
  • Country of Origin Information Report Syria June 2021
    Country of origin information report Syria June 2021 Page 1 of 102 Country of origin information report Syria | June 2021 Publication details City The Hague Assembled by Country of Origin Information Reports Section (DAF/AB) Disclaimer: The Dutch version of this report is leading. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands cannot be held accountable for misinterpretations based on the English version of the report. Page 2 of 102 Country of origin information report Syria | June 2021 Table of contents Publication details ............................................................................................2 Table of contents ..........................................................................................3 Introduction ....................................................................................................5 1 Political and security situation .................................................................... 6 1.1 Political and administrative developments ...........................................................6 1.1.1 Government-held areas ....................................................................................6 1.1.2 Areas not under government control. ............................................................... 11 1.1.3 COVID-19 ..................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Armed groups ............................................................................................... 13 1.2.1 Government forces .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction Chinese Citizens Continue to Face Substantial Obstacles in Seeking Remedies to Government Actions That Violate Th
    1 ACCESS TO JUSTICE Introduction Chinese citizens continue to face substantial obstacles in seeking remedies to government actions that violate their legal rights and constitutionally protected freedoms. International human rights standards require effective remedies for official violations of citi- zens’ rights. Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that ‘‘Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the funda- mental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.’’ 1 Article 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which China has signed but not yet ratified, requires that all parties to the ICCPR ensure that persons whose rights or free- doms are violated ‘‘have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.’’ 2 The Third Plenum and Judicial Reform The November 2013 Chinese Communist Party Central Com- mittee Third Plenum Decision on Certain Major Issues Regarding Comprehensively Deepening Reforms (Third Plenum Decision) con- tained several items relating to judicial system reform.3 In June 2014, the office of the Party’s Central Leading Small Group for Comprehensively Deepening Reform announced that six provinces and municipalities—Shanghai, Guangdong, Jilin, Hubei, Hainan, and Qinghai—would serve as pilot sites for certain judicial reforms, including divesting local governments of their control over local court funding and appointments and centralizing
    [Show full text]
  • 28. Rights Defense and New Citizen's Movement
    JOBNAME: EE10 Biddulph PAGE: 1 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Fri May 10 14:09:18 2019 28. Rights defense and new citizen’s movement Teng Biao 28.1 THE RISE OF THE RIGHTS DEFENSE MOVEMENT The ‘Rights Defense Movement’ (weiquan yundong) emerged in the early 2000s as a new focus of the Chinese democracy movement, succeeding the Xidan Democracy Wall movement of the late 1970s and the Tiananmen Democracy movement of 1989. It is a social movement ‘involving all social strata throughout the country and covering every aspect of human rights’ (Feng Chongyi 2009, p. 151), one in which Chinese citizens assert their constitutional and legal rights through lawful means and within the legal framework of the country. As Benney (2013, p. 12) notes, the term ‘weiquan’is used by different people to refer to different things in different contexts. Although Chinese rights defense lawyers have played a key role in defining and providing leadership to this emerging weiquan movement (Carnes 2006; Pils 2016), numerous non-lawyer activists and organizations are also involved in it. The discourse and activities of ‘rights defense’ (weiquan) originated in the 1990s, when some citizens began using the law to defend consumer rights. The 1990s also saw the early development of rural anti-tax movements, labor rights campaigns, women’s rights campaigns and an environmental movement. However, in a narrow sense as well as from a historical perspective, the term weiquan movement only refers to the rights campaigns that emerged after the Sun Zhigang incident in 2003 (Zhu Han 2016, pp. 55, 60). The Sun Zhigang incident not only marks the beginning of the rights defense movement; it also can be seen as one of its few successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Wei Jingsheng and the Democracy Movement in Post-Mao China Merle David Kellerhals Jr
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Institute for the Humanities Theses Institute for the Humanities Summer 1998 Wei Jingsheng and the Democracy Movement in Post-Mao China Merle David Kellerhals Jr. Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/humanities_etds Part of the Asian History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Kellerhals, Merle D.. "Wei Jingsheng and the Democracy Movement in Post-Mao China" (1998). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, Humanities, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/7pt4-vv58 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/humanities_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for the Humanities at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for the Humanities Theses by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WEI JINGSHENG AND THE DEMOCRACY MOVEMENT IN POST-MAO CHINA by Merle David Kellerhals, Jr B A. May 1995, College of Charleston A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HUMANITIES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 1998 Approved by: Jin Qiu (Director) hen Jie (Member) David Putney (Member) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1391982 Copyright 1999 by Kellerhals/ Merle David, Jr. All rights reserved. UMI Microform 1391982 Copyright 1998, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Convocation - Equity and Aboriginal Issues Committee/Comité Sur L’Équité Et Les Affaires Autochtones Report
    Convocation - Equity and Aboriginal Issues Committee/Comité sur l’équité et les affaires autochtones Report TAB 4 Report to Convocation January 29, 2015 Equity and Aboriginal Issues Committee/ Comité sur l’équité et les affaires autochtones Committee Members Julian Falconer, Chair Janet Leiper, Chair Susan Hare, Vice-Chair and Special Liaison with the Access to Justice Committee Beth Symes, Vice-Chair Constance Backhouse Peter Festeryga Avvy Go Howard Goldblatt Jeffrey Lem Marian Lippa Barbara Murchie Judith Potter Susan Richer Purposes of Report: Decision and Information Prepared by the Equity Initiatives Department (Josée Bouchard – 416-947-3984) 68 Convocation - Equity and Aboriginal Issues Committee/Comité sur l’équité et les affaires autochtones Report TABLE OF CONTENTS For Decision Human Rights Monitoring Group Request for Interventions............................................. TAB 4.1 For Information ............................................................................................................. TAB 4.2 Professor Fiona Kay, The Diversification of Career Paths in Law report Reports on the 2014 Survey of Justicia Firms Public Education Equality and Rule of Law Series Calendar 2014 - 2015 69 Convocation - Equity and Aboriginal Issues Committee/Comité sur l’équité et les affaires autochtones Report COMMITTEE PROCESS 1. The Equity and Aboriginal Issues Committee/Comité sur l’équité et les affaires autochtones (the “Committee”) met on January 15, 2015. Committee members Julian Falconer, Chair, Janet Leiper, Chair, Susan Hare, Vice-Chair and Special Liaison with the Access to Justice Committee, Beth Symes, Vice-Chair, Constance Backhouse, Howard Goldblatt, Jeffrey Lem, Marian Lippa, Barbara Murchie, Judith Potter and Susan Richer participated. Sandra Yuko Nishikawa, Chair of the Equity Advisory Group, and Julie Lassonde, representative of the Association des juristes d’expression française de l’Ontario, also participated.
    [Show full text]
  • G3 Malala Biography
    Malala Yousafzai - Biographical Malala Yousafzai was born on July 12, 1997, in Mingora, the largest city in the Swat Valley in what is now the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan. She is the daughter of Ziauddin and Tor Pekai Yousafzai and has two younger brothers. At a very young age, Malala developed a thirst for knowledge. For years her father, a passionate education advocate himself, ran a learning institution in the city, and school was a big part of Malala's family. She later wrote that her father told her stories about how she would toddle into classes even before she could talk and acted as if she were the teacher. In 2007, when Malala was ten years old, the situation in the Swat Valley rapidly changed for her family and community. The Taliban began to control the Swat Valley and quickly became the dominant socio-political force throughout much of northwestern Pakistan. Girls were banned from attending school, and cultural activities like dancing and watching television were prohibited. Suicide attacks were widespread, and the group made its opposition to a proper education for girls a cornerstone of its terror campaign. By the end of 2008, the Taliban had destroyed some 400 schools. Determined to go to school and with a firm belief in her right to an education, Malala stood up to the Taliban. Alongside her father, Malala quickly became a critic of their tactics. "How dare the Taliban take away my basic right to education?" she once said on Pakistani TV. In early 2009, Malala started to blog anonymously on the Urdu language site of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 2019 Human Rights Report
    IRAN 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is an authoritarian theocratic republic with a Shia Islamic political system based on velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist). Shia clergy, most notably the rahbar (supreme leader), and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate key power structures. The supreme leader is the head of state. The members of the Assembly of Experts are nominally directly elected in popular elections. The assembly selects and may dismiss the supreme leader. The candidates for the Assembly of Experts, however, are vetted by the Guardian Council (see below) and are therefore selected indirectly by the supreme leader himself. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has held the position since 1989. He has direct or indirect control over the legislative and executive branches of government through unelected councils under his authority. The supreme leader holds constitutional authority over the judiciary, government-run media, and other key institutions. While mechanisms for popular election exist for the president, who is head of government, and for the Islamic Consultative Assembly (parliament or majles), the unelected Guardian Council vets candidates, routinely disqualifying them based on political or other considerations, and controls the election process. The supreme leader appoints half of the 12-member Guardian Council, while the head of the judiciary (who is appointed by the supreme leader) appoints the other half. Parliamentary elections held in 2016 and presidential elections held in 2017 were not considered free and fair. The supreme leader holds ultimate authority over all security agencies. Several agencies share responsibility for law enforcement and maintaining order, including the Ministry of Intelligence and Security and law enforcement forces under the Interior Ministry, which report to the president, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which reports directly to the supreme leader.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr
    UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/14/23/Add.1 1 June 2010 ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH ONLY HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Fourteenth session Agenda item 3 PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue Addendum Summary of cases transmitted to Governments and replies received* * Owing to its length, the present report is circulated as received. GE.10-13841 A/HRC/14/23/Add.1 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 - 7 6 Afghanistan ........................................................................................ 8 – 14 7 Algeria ............................................................................................... 15 - 29 8 Angola ................................................................................................ 30 - 37 11 Argentina ........................................................................................... 38 - 83 12 Azerbaijan .......................................................................................... 84 - 97 17 Bahrain ............................................................................................... 98 - 118 19 Belarus ............................................................................................... 119 - 165 23 Bolivia ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gagging the Lawyers: China’S Crackdown on Human Rights Lawyers and Implica- Tions for U.S.-China Relations
    GAGGING THE LAWYERS: CHINA’S CRACKDOWN ON HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERS AND IMPLICA- TIONS FOR U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS HEARING BEFORE THE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 28, 2017 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 26–342 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:36 Jan 29, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 U:\26342.TXT PAT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Senate House MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Chairman CHRIS SMITH, New Jersey, Cochairman TOM COTTON, Arkansas ROBERT PITTENGER, North Carolina STEVE DAINES, Montana TRENT FRANKS, Arizona JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois TODD YOUNG, Indiana MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California TIM WALZ, Minnesota JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon TED LIEU, California GARY PETERS, Michigan ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Not yet appointed ELYSE B. ANDERSON, Staff Director PAUL B. PROTIC, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:36 Jan 29, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 U:\26342.TXT PAT CO N T E N T S STATEMENTS Page Opening Statement of Hon. Christopher Smith, a U.S. Representative From New Jersey; Cochairman, Congressional-Executive Commission on China .... 1 Statement of Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Their Loved Ones Are Being Held
    1 ACCESS DENIED Access Denied is a three-part report series that looks at the serious deterioration that has been happening to due process in China. This first volume,Access Denied: China’s Vanishing Suspects, examines the police practice of registering suspects under fake names at pre-trial detention centres, making it difficult or impossible for lawyers to access their clients or for families to know where their loved ones are being held. The second volume, Access Denied: China’s False Freedom, researches the ‘non-release release’ phenomenon, as first coined by US professor of law Jerome Cohen, in which prisoners, once freed from jail or a detention centre, continue to be arbitrarily confined by the police, usually at a secret location or at their home for weeks, months or even years. The final volume,Access Denied: China’s Legal Blockade, looks at the multitude of ways police employ to deny suspects legal assistance, including the use of threats or torture to force them into renouncing their own lawyer and accepting state-appointed counsel. About Safeguard Defenders Safeguard Defenders is a human rights NGO founded in late 2016. It undertakes and supports local field activities that contribute to the protection of basic rights, promote the rule of law and enhance the ability of local civil society and human rights defenders in some of the most hostile environments in Asia. https://safeguarddefenders.com | @safeguarddefend Access Denied: China’s Vanishing Suspects © 2020 Safeguard Defenders | Cover image by Antlem Published by Safeguard Defenders All rights reserved. This report may not be reproduced, transmitted, or stored in whole or in part by any means including graphic, electronic, or mechanical without expressed written consent of the publisher/author except in the case of brief quotations embodied in articles and reviews.
    [Show full text]