DOCSLIB.ORG

Internet Citizens 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Internet Citizens 2015 Internet Citizens 2015 Published: December 2015 Introduction • This report provides an update to our 2014 Internet Citizens publication and gives an overview of people’s online use of services and content in a range of citizen-orientated areas. Alongside this slide pack there is a written executive summary. • Ofcom has a principal duty to further the interests of citizens, and this includes seeking to ensure that people have access to the services and content they need in order to participate fully in society. This report provides an overview of people’s online use of such services and content in selected areas. • As in 2014, we have focused on a number of core topics to provide a breadth of comparative analysis. These include: government services, health information, education, public service broadcasters and news organisations, citizen journalism and arts and cultural organisations and activities. It is challenging to create a fully comprehensive and universally-accepted list of online citizen-related content and services. We do not claim such comprehensiveness here and welcome feedback on what else might be included. Nonetheless, we have selected some core categories that, taken together, can be seen to represent a landscape of broadly citizen-orientated content and services that enable participation in society. • It should be noted that the report focuses largely on the more mainstream or major providers of this type of content. This is in large part because measuring smaller, grassroots citizen initiatives is by definition more difficult. Despite their potentially limited scale, we note that these grassroots providers may nevertheless generate significant value to citizens. 1 Sources • We draw from a range of data sources – in particular comScore, the online measurement system. We have used ComScore’s multi-platform data (MMX-MP) in order to capture internet activity across mobiles and tablets as well as desktops and laptops. Data are de-duplicated to provide information on the number of individual users, regardless of whether those users are accessing websites across multiple devices or from multiple browsers. Due to methodological changes in the way that consumption on mobile devices is measured we focus on data from the first half of 2015, and predominantly from June 2015. These changes also mean it is not possible to compare comScore data with that in the 2014 report. • We also draw on a range of other data sources: – Ofcom: Adults’ media use and attitudes report http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media- literacy/media-lit-10years/2015_Adults_media_use_and_attitudes_report.pdf – UK Government: data on UK government websites www.gov.uk/performance with additional material from the Cabinet Office – Scottish Government: data on Scottish Government websites recorded by Google Analytics and provided by Scottish Government – Wales Government: data on Welsh Government websites provided by Welsh Government. – Northern Ireland Government: data on Northern Ireland Government websites recorded by Google Analytics and WebTrends and provided by NI Government. – DCMS: Taking Part Survey – data on participation in digital cultural activities in England https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/476156/Taking_Part_201415_Focus_o n_Digital_engagement.pdf – Office for National Statistics (ONS): Internet Access – Households and Individuals 2015 – data on online activities of people in Britain http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_412758.pdf – Digital R&D Fund for the Arts: data on the online activities of a range of arts and cultural organisations in England http://artsdigitalrnd.org.uk/features/digitalculture2014/ – Local Web List: directory of hyperlocal websites available at http://localweblist.net/ 2 comScore Methodology • The UK Online Measurement Company (UKOM) was formed in 2009 with a mandate from the advertising industry to establish measurement standards for digital media. In 2011, comScore was appointed the sole data supplier for UKOM under a three-year contract from January 2013. comScore MMX MP™ uses comScore MMX Multi-Platform to analyse website and app use across laptop/desktop computers, mobiles and tablets. The digital audience is an unduplicated unique audience between each of these devices, and the unique viewers of videos on laptop/desktop computers. Its methodology combines internet traffic, captured from a panel of internet users, with website interaction data from website publishers, in order to provide a projection of which websites people are visiting and how long they are spending browsing web pages. This is comScore’s Unified Digital Measurement™ (UDM) methodology. • Throughout this report web entities are followed by a letter in square brackets e.g. [C]. This letter designates where in a ‘hierarchy’ of web entities a particular entity sits. This hierarchy is comScore’s dictionary. A property [P] is the legal parent of any web entities that sit within it, such as a media title [M], channel [C], or group [G]. How the entities of a property are defined in comScore’s dictionary is determined by the properties themselves. As such, while there are similarities between different entities at a similar dictionary level, they are not always equivalent. • The comScore metrics used in this report are: – Unique audience: the total number of unique persons who have visited a website or used an application at least once in a given month. Persons visiting the same website more than once are therefore counted only once in this measure – Active reach (%): the unique audience of a website as a proportion of the total number of people who visited any website, or used any internet-connected application, at least once in a given month (the active audience). – Time spent per month: the average time spent browsing a website per unique visitor per month (excludes time spent watching online video and listening to streamed audio). 3 Contents Section Contents Slide number 1 Government and politics 5 2 Health information 19 3 Education 24 Media – public service broadcasting, news, citizen 4 30 journalism (including blogging) and hyperlocal Culture – heritage, arts, archives, museums, galleries 5 38 and libraries 4 1 Government and politics This series of slides show a range of data from the data services departments of the UK and devolved governments. Given the different types of government service site, and the different types of metrics provided here, including variation in the time periods used, it is not possible to compare these figures across the nations. 5 GOV.UK Figure 1.1: Visitors to GOV.UK by device, Jan-June 2015 According to the performance statistics of GOV.UK, it received nearly 48 million unique visits in June 2015. Of these, 27 million accessed it via a desktop, 14 million via a mobile, and nearly 6 million by a tablet. These numbers are high – representing indeed around the number of active internet users in the UK – but the figures include overseas visitors, and the data isn’t “de-duplicated”, so that people that access from different devices will be counted multiple times. Unique visitors (millions) 60.0 50.0 47.67 44.01 41.61 41.66 42.41 5.86 38.99 5.72 40.0 5.44 5.25 5.27 5.15 14.35 12.81 30.0 10.88 12.77 12.83 Tablet 10.62 Mobile Desktop 20.0 27.46 25.28 23.22 25.49 23.64 24.31 10.0 0.0 Jan-15 Feb March April May June Source: www..gov.uk/performance with additional data from the Cabinet Office. 6 GOV.UK Figure 1.2: Top ten UK ministerial departments by visitors, June 2015 The Foreign Office was the most-visited ministerial department in June 2015 by a considerable margin. The Department for Education was visited by 0.82 million, and the Department for Work and Pensions by 0.7 million 1.4 Users(millions) 1.26 1.2 1.0 0.82 0.8 0.70 0.63 0.6 0.44 0.43 0.40 0.38 0.4 0.34 0.31 0.26 0.2 - Foreign DfE DWP Home CO BIS Defra MoD DfT DCLG HMT Office Office Source: www..gov.uk/performance with additional data from the Cabinet Office. Note: Data collected between June 2nd and June 30th 2015. This data covers only department and policy content found on /government and /guidance URLs. Mainstream content, that with a wider appeal such as services and information like 'next Bank Holiday' for example, is not included. In cases where multiple departments share content, visitors who access that content will only be recorded for one department only; consequently, some departments’ number of visitors may be undercounted. 7 GOV.UK Figure 1.3: Top ten home pages on GOV.UK, June 2015 In June 2015, the job search home page was the most-viewed, with 4.5 million unique page views. The vehicle tax home page was next, with 3.9 million unique page views, followed by the HMRC home page with 3 million unique page views. Rank Page Unique page views 1. /jobsearch 4,542,018 2. /vehicle-tax 3,867,455 3. /government/organisations/hm-revenue-customs 3,002,088 4. /government/organisations/companies-house 2,000,602 5. /view-driving-licence 1,791,574 6. /get-information-about-a-company 1,614,367 7. /browse/driving 1,601,765 8. /log-in-register-hmrc-online-services 1,527,654 9. /check-vehicle-tax 1,520,022 10. /browse/visas-immigration 1,454,912 Source: www..gov.uk/performance with additional data from the Cabinet Office Note: this data covers only department and policy content found on /government and /guidance URLs; mainstream content with a wider appeal (such as information like 'next Bank Holiday‘) is not included. In cases where content is shared between multiple departments, only one of the departments will have been recorded as having received a page view. 8 GOV.SCOT Figure 1.4: Key metrics for GOV.SCOT, Jan-June 2015 www.gov.scot covers the responsibilities of the Scottish Government including health, education, justice, rural affairs, housing and the environment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7116-A BBC TV Review
    Independent Review of the BBC’s Digital Television Services 1 Contents Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 13 1.1 Background, terms of reference, and report structure 13 1.2 General and specific approval conditions 16 1.3 Review process 16 1.4 Consultation results 17 1.5 Conceptual framework: net public value 19 1.6 The BBC’s digital TV strategy and its assumptions about audience behaviour 23 1.7 Television is a mass medium, not a niche medium 26 2. Performance Against the Approval Conditions 35 2.1 CBeebies 35 2.2 CBBC 37 2.3 BBC3 41 2.4 BBC4 47 2.5 Interactivity 50 2.6 Driving digital takeup 52 2.7 Value for money 54 2.8 Performance against conditions: summary and conclusions 58 3. Market Impact 63 3.1 Introduction 63 3.2 In what ways might the BBC’s services impact the market? 65 3.3 Clarifying the “base case” 66 3.4 Direct impact on commercial channels’ revenue 69 3.5 Impact on programme supply market 77 3.6 Impact on long-run competitiveness of the market 79 3.7 Market impact: summary and conclusions 80 4. How Might the Services Develop in the Future? 82 4.1 Summary of conclusions: performance and market impact 82 4.2 The evolving market context and the BBC-TV portfolio 87 4.3 Recommendations for future development 91 Appendix: Ofcom Analysis of Genre Mix 98 Supplementary Reports* Report on CBeebies and CBBC, by Máire Messenger Davies Report on BBC3 and BBC4, by Steve Hewlett Assessment of the Market Impact of the BBC’s New Digital TV and Radio Services, by Ofcom About the Author 100 *All supplementary reports are available electronically on the DCMS website, www.culture.gov.uk 2 Independent Review of the BBC’s Digital Television Services Executive Summary This report reviews the BBC’s digital television services CBeebies, CBBC, BBC3 and BBC4.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 BBC Four Biopics
    BBC Four biopics: Lessons in Trashy Respectability The broadcast of Burton and Taylor in July 2013 marked the end of a decade- long cycle of feature-length biographical dramas transmitted on BBC Four, the niche arts and culture digital channel of the public service broadcaster. The subjects treated in these biopics were various: political figures, famous cooks, authors of popular literature, comedians and singers. The dramas focused largely on the unhappy or complex personal lives of well-loved figures of British popular culture. From the lens of the 21st century, these dramas offered an opportunity for audiences to reflect on the culture and society of the 20th century, changing television’s famous function of ‘witness’ to one of ‘having witnessed’ and/or ‘remembering’ (Ellis, 2000). The programmes function as nostalgia pieces, revisiting personalities familiar to the anticipated older audience of BBC Four, working in concert with much of the archive and factual content on the digital broadcaster’s schedules. However, by revealing apparent ‘truths’ that reconfigure the public images of the figures they narrate, these programmes also undermine nostalgic impulses, presenting conflicting interpretations of the recent past. They might equally be seen as impudent incursions onto the memory of the public figures, unnecessarily exposing the real-life subjects to censure, ridicule or ex post facto critical judgement. Made thriftily on small budgets, the films were modest and spare in visual style but were generally well received critically, usually thanks to writerly screenplays and strong central performances. The dramas became an irregular but important staple of the BBC Four schedule, furnishing the channel with some of their highest ratings in a history chequered by low audience numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC R&D Annual Review 2001-2002
    BBC Research & Development maintains a world-class forward research programme. This enables us to deliver significant competitive advantage to the BBC. BBC R&D ANNUAL REVIEW 1 foreword BBC Research & Development maintains a world-class forward research production systems, and the planning of a their roll-out across the BBC. Our R&D expertise programme in a variety of broadcast technologies. As a consequence we are is placing the BBC at the leading edge of this revolution – offering us a major efficiency advantage compared with our competitors. BBC Technology is implementing these pilot able to deliver significant competitive advantage to the BBC. This last year systems, and will themselves gain an important time advantage in reaching the market with has been particularly productive and fruitful. this key new technology. BBC R&D has also delivered leading-edge technology to support the BBC’s production The full benefits of digital broadcasting are now beginning to come through to our viewers function. Examples include our work on the new production centres, speech-assisted and listeners. The BBC has launched new television and radio services and significantly subtitling, high-definition video production, digital radio cameras, and virtual production. enhanced the quality and sophistication of the interactive and enhanced services on the In a time of rapid technology change, there is no shortage of demand from our BBC FOREWORD digital platform. Interactive Wimbledon 2001, the enhanced Walking with Beasts colleagues for our effort and advice. Demand exceeds our ability to meet it, and we have to programme, the BBC i-Bar, regional news programmes and the new BBC Children’s work hard to retain a significant allocation of effort to continue the long-term, blue-sky channels have all been critical successes for the BBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Appeals Tribunal
    *gaAg-k Administrative Appeals Tribunal ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL No: 2010/4470 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION Re: Australian Subscription Television and Radio Association Applicant And: Australian Human Rights Commission Respondent And: Media Access Australia Other Party TRIBUNAL: Ms G Ettinger, Senior Member DATE: 30 April 2012 PLACE: Sydney In accordance with section 34D(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975: in the course of an alternative dispute resolution process, the parties have reached an agreement as to the terms of a decision of the Tribunal that is acceptable to the parties; and the terms of the agreement have been reduced to writing, signed by or on behalf of the parties and lodged with the Tribunal; and the Tribunal is satisfied that a decision in those terms is within the powers of the Tribunal and is appropriate to make. Accordingly the Tribunal sets aside the decision of the Respondent and substitutes a decision that reflects the conditions jointly agreed by the parties and annexed to this decision. [ IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL File Number 2010/4470 AUSTRALIAN SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION AND RADIO ASSOCIATION Applicant AND AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Respondent AND MEDIA ACCESS AUSTRALIA Joined Party BY CONSENT THE TRIBUNAL MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 55 OF THE DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1992 (CTI1): 1. Exemption 1.1 Each of the Entities is exempt from the operation of ss 5, 6, 7, 8,24, 122 and 123 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) in respect of the provision of Captioning from the date of this Order until 30 June 2015 on the condition that it complies with the conditions outlined below that are applicable to it by reason of its operation as either a Channel Provider or a Platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Service Broadcasting and Digital Television in the UK the Politics of Positioning
    Public Service Broadcasting and Digital Television in the UK The Politics of Positioning Georgina Born The advent of digital television [DTV] and the convergence between televi- sion, computing and telecommunications technologies augur radical changes in the media ecology. In the context of the ensuing technological, economic, regulatory and cultural uncertainties, some analysts argue that public serv- ice broadcasting faces new threats (Søndergaard 1998; Chalaby and Segell 1999), others that it bears new responsibilities (Graham 1997, 2000; Inglewood 2000; Born and Prosser 2001).1 Clearly, public service broadcasters [PSBs] have both to adjust and to take advantage of the new opportunities afforded by convergence. As convergence gathers speed it brings a proliferation of new platforms and services, some of which will fall away as markets and technologies mature. If, with limited resources, the PSBs cannot be in every new market, then the question arises: where should the PSBs involve themselves? The question is both normative and political. It is also the central policy challenge faced by the PSBs themselves in the convergence context. This chapter is based on the results of a 2001 study that examined how Britain’s two main PSBs, the BBC and Channel Four [C4], were positioning themselves in the new markets, and specifically in DTV.2 The study looked at the character and content of the broadcasters’ strategies for DTV, and at how the strategies were developed. The chapter compares their DTV strategies, assessing their relat- ive public service value. The analysis also highlights the implications of the study for sociological theory, particularly recent developments in economic sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Market Impact of the BBC's New Digital TV And
    Assessment of the Market Impact of the BBC’s New Digital TV and Radio Services An analysis by Ofcom, conducted as an input into the independent reviews of the BBC’s new digital TV and radio services 13 October 2004 Assessment of the market impact of the BBC’s new digital TV and radio services Contents 1. Introduction - 3 - 2. Summary of market impact - 4 - 3. Market overview - 8 - 4. Our approach - 19 - 5. The benefits of digital broadcasting - 27 - 6. Risks to competition in certain niche markets - 33 - 7. Conclusions - 48 - A Analysis of O&O’s market impact assessment - 50 - - 2 - Assessment of the market impact of the BBC’s new digital TV and radio services 1. Introduction 1.1 In the last licence fee settlement in February 2000 Chris Smith, the then Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (‘Secretary of State’) said the BBC should “provide a strong and distinctive schedule of benchmark quality programmes on all its services and should drive the take-up of new digital and on-line services”. 1.2 By the end of 2002, the BBC had, as part of its response, launched five new digital radio services (the radio stations 1Xtra, BBC 6, BBC 7, BBC Asian Network and Five Live Sports Extra) and four new digital TV services (the channels BBC 3, BBC 4, CBeebies and CBBC). 1.3 In April 2004, the Secretary of State commissioned two independent reviews – one of the BBC's digital TV services (led by Professor Patrick Barwise) and the other of the BBC’s digital radio services (led by Tim Gardam).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Wide Screen Broadcasting in the United Kingdom
    Evolution of Wide Screen Broadcasting in the United Kingdom Paul Gardiner Independent Television Commission United Kingdom This paper reviews the recent evolution of widescreen broadcasting in the United Kingdom. Early work sought to develop enhancements to the analogue PAL system in order to deliver clearer, sharper pictures in the 16:9 format, but widescreen broadcasting has become associated firmly with the successful introduction of digital broadcasting. As a result, sales of widescreen television receivers are growing rapidly, while UK broadcasters are transmitting a significant and increasing proportion of their output in 16:9. This has become technically possible and economically viable because of the ability to use a single production chain to serve both the widescreen digital and analogue 4:3 transmission networks - with careful attention given to appropriate ‘safe areas’ for picture framing and the positioning of captions, applying the principles of Rec. ITU-R BT.1379. 1 Introduction Most people would agree that a widescreen picture is more pleasing aesthetically than the squarer 4:3 shape of conventional television systems. It is closer to the way in which the eye views the world, and enhances the sense of realism. Widescreen formats are in general use in today’s cinema, although there is no single worldwide widescreen aspect ratio for the film image – films are framed for projection in aspect ratios typically in the range 1.75:1 to 1.85:1; in some cases 2.35:1 or wider. Nevertheless, many films are shot in aspect ratio that is close to the widescreen television aspect ratio of 16:9 (approximately 1.78:1).
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Trust Review 1
    BBC Executive Submission to the BBC Trust’s Review of BBC One, BBC Two and BBC Four April 2010 Part 1: Implementing Putting Quality First Executive Summary I. The review The BBC Trust launched its review of BBC One, BBC Two and BBC Four in September 2009, as part of its rolling programme of service reviews as required in the Charter and Agreement. It was agreed with the BBC Trust to postpone the Executive submission until Spring 2010 in order to reflect the recommendations and themes of the pan-BBC strategy Putting Quality First. 25 September 2009 Review begins; public consultation launched Autumn/winter 2009 Trust Unit gathers evidence from BBC Executive, public consultation, audience research and other sources 18 December 2009 Public consultation closes Spring Data analysis and conclusions Summer 2010 Trust report publication II. The scope of this submission This document, Executive Submission – Part 1, details how the BBC’s portfolio of television services – in particular BBC One, BBC Two and BBC Four – will support the themes of Putting Quality First and how they will respond to a number of questions which the BBC Trust has asked of the Executive, both in their Terms of Reference and in subsequent communications1. It aims to be a top level summary of the strategic direction of the portfolio. The questions that this document specifically addresses are: 1. Are BBC One, BBC Two and BBC Four equipped to deliver their service licence commitments in the future, in particular to meet audience expectations of high quality and distinctive content? ­ Do the services have appropriate strategies in place? ­ Are resources appropriately allocated to meet objectives? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introductory History of British Broadcasting
    An Introductory History of British Broadcasting ‘. a timely and provocative combination of historical narrative and social analysis. Crisell’s book provides an important historical and analytical introduc- tion to a subject which has long needed an overview of this kind.’ Sian Nicholas, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television ‘Absolutely excellent for an overview of British broadcasting history: detailed, systematic and written in an engaging style.’ Stephen Gordon, Sandwell College An Introductory History of British Broadcasting is a concise and accessible history of British radio and television. It begins with the birth of radio at the beginning of the twentieth century and discusses key moments in media history, from the first wireless broadcast in 1920 through to recent developments in digital broadcasting and the internet. Distinguishing broadcasting from other kinds of mass media, and evaluating the way in which audiences have experienced the medium, Andrew Crisell considers the nature and evolution of broadcasting, the growth of broadcasting institutions and the relation of broadcasting to a wider political and social context. This fully updated and expanded second edition includes: ■ The latest developments in digital broadcasting and the internet ■ Broadcasting in a multimedia era and its prospects for the future ■ The concept of public service broadcasting and its changing role in an era of interactivity, multiple channels and pay per view ■ An evaluation of recent political pressures on the BBC and ITV duopoly ■ A timeline of key broadcasting events and annotated advice on further reading Andrew Crisell is Professor of Broadcasting Studies at the University of Sunderland. He is the author of Understanding Radio, also published by Routledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Cbbc Roadshows 2002
    CBBC ROADSHOWS 2002 Mon 29th July Beach, Skegness, England (Foreshore) With Darius, S Club Juniors, and ATC Wed 31st July Wythenshawe Park, Manchester, England With Blue, 3SL, and Boniface Mon 5th August Beach, Blackpool, England (next to central pier) With Abs, Liberty X, Busted and Omero Wed 7th August Events Arena, Rhyl Promenade, Rhyl With Sugababes, 3SL and Hear’Say Mon 12th August Castlewellan Forest Park, Castlewellan, Northern Ireland With H & Claire, Six and Harvey (So Solid Crew) Wed 14th August Irvine Beach Park, Irvine, Scotland With a1 and D Mac Mon 19th August The Hoe, Plymouth, England With Atomic Kitten Wed 21st August Barrowfields, Newquay, England With Liberty X Hold on tight - CBBC are gearing up for their biggest summer ever and are coming to a town near you! Following the massive success of the Blue Peter roadshows last year, CBBC have decided to make this summer even bigger and better by staging eight UK roadshows, hosted by the stars of favourites Blue Peter, Xchange and CBBC. All eight live shows will bring the very best of CBBC to towns around the UK - a mix of top pop guests - your favourite CBBC stars - and some amazing competitions and giveaways. CBBC is also on the look-out for the hot new dancing talent of the future and will be staging a top competition where you could be spotted by Popstars talent guru Nicki Chapman. At each roadshow, CBBC will be holding a dance competition, the winners from each show going through to the grand final at the last roadshow. The lucky overall winners will get coaching from a team of choreographers, and the chance to perform with Gareth Gates on Blue Peter later on this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontline War on Bbc Knowledge
    Wednesday June 26, 2013 FRONTLINE WAR ON BBC KNOWLEDGE From Tuesday July 16, BBC Knowledge presents Frontline War, a season of programmes portraying the confronting, emotional and courageous stories of heroes on the frontline. Frontline War delves into the realities of modern-day war, seen through the eyes of the soldiers and their loved ones, and showcases a unique collection of programmes including Our War – Series 2, Wounded, Bomb Hunters, Life After War: Haunted by Helmand and The World’s Deadliest Arms Race – first on Foxtel. Our War – Series 2 is a Bafta-winning series depicting compelling stories from Afghanistan, filmed and told by the soldiers themselves. The series has attracted critical acclaim in the UK, with The Guardian commenting “The return of the award-winning Our War for a second series did more to bring home the realities of the war in Afghanistan than any number of news reports…” The observational documentary Wounded, follows injured soldiers as they return home for life- saving medical treatment. Surviving their injuries is only part of the battle as these young soldiers must adapt to life with their new disabilities. This programme won a Bafta as well as the Best Documentary Award at the Royal Television Society Programme Awards in 2010, The Times called it “one of the most powerful and moving documentaries of the year”. In Bomb Hunters, one of the British Army’s most senior bomb disposal experts, Chris Hunter shares his astonishing story of dismantling countless IEDs for more than a decade in Northern Ireland, Iraq and Afghanistan. Chris was so successful that an insurgent group ordered his assassination.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Executive Priorities and Summary Workplan for 2011/12 Statement from the Senior Independent Director
    BBC Executive priorities and summary workplan for 2011/12 Statement from the Senior Independent Director This workplan for the BBC is the first edition of a new annual publication. It summarises the BBC's strategy, objectives and outline budget for the year ahead together with noteworthy individual events. The publication of this workplan is part of the BBC's commitment to openness and transparency, both to the BBC Trust and to licence fee payers. The document is also an important part of the way that I, as the BBC's Senior Independent Director, acting together with my fellow non-executive directors on the BBC's Executive Board, will ensure that the BBC meets its strategy and fulfils its obligations to the satisfaction of the BBC Trust and licence fee payers. This document is not a blueprint for the year ahead. Plans must and no doubt will change in certain areas to accommodate events. The BBC has, however, a clear strategy in Putting Quality First and, with the licence fee settlement of October 2010, a clear budgetary framework to work within. Whenever our plans change they must, on balance, remain focussed on delivering against our strategy and within our budget. It is intended that the annual workplan will assist this reconciliation of our regular affairs with our long-term strategy and budget. The non-executive members of the BBC Executive Board look forward to working with the Director-General to deliver the contents of this workplan and I commend it to the BBC Trust. Marcus Agius Senior Independent Director BBC BBC Summary Workplan
    [Show full text]