DOCSLIB.ORG

Final+Russia+Dossier.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dossier Count Vladimir Kokovtsov1 -- was a Russian politician who served as the Prime Minister of ​ Russia from 1911. Staunch and conservative, he is one of the most powerful figures in Russia and deals with matters with a trusted iron hand. He is extremely intolerant of the left or any of his opponents--political or otherwise, and often deals with them fatally. As prime minister, he has significant influence over the Duma, the lawmaking body in the Russian empire. He also has significant influence over Tsar Nicholas II, serving as one of his closest advisors. Prince Georgy Lvov2-- a Russian statesman and a supporter of reform, Lvov joined the liberal ​ Constitutional Democratic Party. In 1906 he won election to the Duma. A serial playboy, Georgy touts liberal values loud and proud much to the annoyance of powerful conservatives who see him as an enemy to the future of Russia. He organized work relief efforts during the Russo-Japanese war in 1893, thus he has a fair amount of influence over veterans from this war. He believes in progressive ideals, and thinks that Russia needs to move forward. He believes that Tsar Nicholas might be incompetent and may need replacement. Vasily Shulgin3-- a Russian conservative monarchist, in 1907 Shulgin became a member of the Duma. He advocated right-wing views, supported the government of Pyotr Stolypin, including introduction of courts-martial, and other controversial changes. A strict, powerful political presence in Russia, he is a staunch believer in Machiavellian ethics and is willing to do whatever it takes to bring a highly conservative future to Russia. He has significant influence of his fellow 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Kokovtsov 2 http://spartacus-educational.com/RUSlvov.htm 3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Shulgin conservatives throughout Russia, and is seen as a leader in the Duma for the right-wing members. Alexander Guchkov4 -- a major industrialist and in 1907 was elected to the Duma where he ​ later served as its third Chairman. Guchkov advocated political reform and became leader of the Octobrist Party. A bit of a wild-card, Alexander plays the field with both liberal and conservative politics and is thus friendly with almost all the major political presences in Russia. He sees Russia being the best it possibly can through whatever means necessary. He has a lot of support from industrial workers throughout Russia, having favor with a lot of the trade unions throughout the Russian Empire. Nikolai Ruzsky5 -- a Russian general, member of the state and military councils. He most recently served as a commander in the Russo-Japanese War. A very shrewd thinker and analyst, Nikolai is always three steps ahead of his opponents and plans things very far in advance, often to his personal favor rather than for Russia. He controls a large portion of the Russian military, serving as First General of the Imperial Russian Infantry. He is seen as a war hero throughout the country, and has a lot of public support. Apart from his military influence, he is also a major player for pushing for reform in Russia. Mikhail Frunze6 -- the son of a peasant, as a student Frunze joined the Social Democratic Party where he supported the Bolshevik faction and eventually became a Bolshevik leader. A true rags-to-riches story, Frunze utilizes his newfound political power to the extremes, letting it 4 http://spartacus-educational.com/RUSguchkov.htm 5 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Ruzsky 6 http://spartacus-educational.com/RUSfrunze.htm oftentimes get the best of him. Frunze believes in radical reforms throughout the Russian Empire, appealing to a lot of the peasants and farmers throughout the country. Growing up as a farm worker’s son, he has the heart of the people. Alexander Kerensky7 -- a Russian lawyer and revolutionary. In 1905 Kerensky joined the ​ Socialist Revolutionary Party (SR) and became editor of the radical newspaper, Burevestik. He was soon arrested and sent into exile. He returned to St. Petersburg in 1906 and found work as a lawyer. Kerensky joined the Russian Labour Party and in 1912 was elected to the State Duma. A polarizing figure, he has many enemies and thus now enshrouds himself in secrecy and heavy protection. Grigori Rasputin8-- a Russian mystic and self-proclaimed holy man who befriended the family of Tsar Nicholas II and gained considerable influence in late imperial Russia. Rasputin has incredible influence within the imperial family and many believe he is the Queen’s lover. It’s even safe to say he is kept in the Tsar’s inner-most council of advisors. He has significant influence over the Tsar’s policy for the Russian empire. Grand Duke Alexander of Russia9 -- a dynast of the Russian Empire, a naval officer, an author, explorer, the brother-in-law of Emperor Nicholas II and advisor to him. Grand Duke Alexander has close familial ties to the imperial family although he is on lukewarm terms with his brother-in-law, the Emperor. He is a large landowner, owning farms throughout the country. He 7 http://spartacus-educational.com/RUSkerensky.htm 8 http://spartacus-educational.com/RUSrasputin.htm 9 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duke_Alexander_Mikhailovich_of_Russia is one of the richest men in Russia, and has great influence over all those involved in agriculture, including the peasants. Grand Duke Nikolai Romanov10-- the second cousin of Tsar Nicholas II, he worked his way up through all the military ranks until he was appointed commander of the Guard Hussar Regiment in 1884. He remains on good terms with Emperor Nicholas II although they have not talked for many years. Grand Duke Nikolai is known to abuse his royal blood by coercing others into doing his personal bidding while claiming that it is for the imperial family. He has significant influence over the military and has a lot of power within the military itself. He is seen as one of the most highest-ranking military advisors in all of imperial Russia. Aleksandr Krymov11 --a Russian Imperial Lieutenant General, most recently serving as a military commander in the Russo-Japanese War. An expert in torture, Krymov is a bloodthirsty war-hawk and will do whatever he can to get back on the battlefield. Some say he kills civilians for sport, although it has never been proven. He serves as the General of the Cavalry, having a great deal of military power in imperial Russia. Sergius Witte12 -- a highly influential econometrician, minister, and prime minister in Imperial ​ Russia. He has been one of the key figures in the political arena in Russia since the late nineteenth century. He is extremely, as his surname suggests, witty and often pulls extremely complex pranks on his fellow politicians, much to their chagrin. He is seen as one of the most 10 http://spartacus-educational.com/FWWnikolai.htm 11 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Krymov 12 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Witte influential economists in the Russian empire, and the Tsar seeks his advice on economics quite often. 13 Pavel Nikolayevich Miliukov --a Russian historian and liberal politician. Milyukov was the founder, leader, and the most prominent member of the Constitutional Democratic party (known as the Kadets). An incredibly knowledgeable and effective debater, Pavel always seeks to turn ​ ​ conservative politicians to his side and campaigns tirelessly for human rights and the liberal cause. He is a huge pacifist and detests the mere mention of war. He is a large leader in the anti-war effort, and has a wide support of the public who is against war. He was a big critic of the Balkan Wars, seeing as they cost Russia both money and human life. He would detest war above all else. Khabib Nurmagomedov-- a retired Russian war general turned underground fighter, he has ​ become incredibly wealthy from placing large bets on himself and remaining undefeated throughout all of his brutal bouts. Although he was born to a poor family, his social status has skyrocketed with each victory and he is now among the Russian elites. Although he does not have much, or any political experience, prominent Russian politicians greatly enjoy his presence and consider his political advice very seriously. Mikhail Rodzianko14 -- the son of a wealthy landowner and a senior army officer. Rodzianko ​ was elected to the third Duma and in March, 1911, became its leader. He was a loyal supporter of Nicholas II but was willing to criticize failings in his administration. A brutally honest character, Mikhail has made many enemies by pointing out their shortcomings, quite rudely, to 13 http://spartacus-educational.com/RUSmiliukov.htm 14 http://spartacus-educational.com/RUSrodzianko.htm their face. He is one of the richest men in Russia and remains popular among the aristocracy in the Russian empire. Ivan Goremykin15 -- a conservative Russian politician who served as Prime Minister in 1906. A self-described "man of the old school" who views the Tsar as the rightful sovereign, Goremykin is a loyal supporter of Nicholas II as autocrat and accordingly pursued conservative policy. Ivan is one of the Emperor’s biggest fans and constantly strives to get close to the Emperor, prompting many to believe that he is secretly in love with Tsar Nicholas II. Leyla Urushanova -- an ultra-famous opera singer dubbed ‘The Russian Nightingale’, her ​ ​ immense wealth and popularity allow her to preach to the masses at her concerts with whatever political messages she wants to get out. She leans heavily liberal and is suspected of having ties with some very underhanded groups of people in Russia. She is widely popular in the public, thus has a great deal of influence in the political sphere. Baron Boris Stürmer16 -- a Russian lawyer, a Master of Ceremonies at the Russian Court, and a district governor.
Recommended publications
  • The Russian Revolution: a Wider Perspective

    The Russian Revolution: a Wider Perspective

    - THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION: A WIDER PERSPECTIVE PREFACE to the Source Collection on the Russian Revolution This is a collection of sources provided by members of the Euroclio network and curated by three members of the Historiana team. It Insert Source here: is not a comprehensive overview of the Russian Revolution. Its purpose is to provide some insights into how politicians, diplomats, senior military officers, other officials, revolutionaries, eye witnesses, bystanders, newspaper editors and journalists, ordinary people and even children perceived some of the key events in Russia from January 1917 through to December 1922. We hope that this transnational and multiperspective collection will widen students’ understanding of what happened in Russia in those critical years. The sources have been provided by history teachers and historians from 13 countries, including the Russian Federation, neighbouring states that in 1917 were part of the Russian Empire, states that were then allies or enemies of Russia and even states which were neutral non-combatants in 1917. To obtain these sources the contributors turned to their own national digital and physical archives. Where necessary, contributors summarised texts in English. Painting by British artist David For EUROCLIO this was a pilot experiment in collecting historical Jagger, entitled The Bolshevik sources and we are very grateful to everyone who took part. We (1918). The image combines the think the experiment was successful and EUROCLIO will be planning features of several Bolshevik further crowd-sourcing of collections on other significant moments leaders. and developments in world history in the future. Source: Canadian War Museum Bob Stradling, Louise Sträuli and Giulia Rossi Public Domain Summer 2019 THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT This collection is divided into four Introductionsections.
  • Revolution in Real Time: the Russian Provisional Government, 1917

    Revolution in Real Time: the Russian Provisional Government, 1917

    ODUMUNC 2020 Crisis Brief Revolution in Real Time: The Russian Provisional Government, 1917 ODU Model United Nations Society Introduction seventy-four years later. The legacy of the Russian Revolution continues to be keenly felt The Russian Revolution began on 8 March 1917 to this day. with a series of public protests in Petrograd, then the Winter Capital of Russia. These protests But could it have gone differently? Historians lasted for eight days and eventually resulted in emphasize the contingency of events. Although the collapse of the Russian monarchy, the rule of history often seems inventible afterwards, it Tsar Nicholas II. The number of killed and always was anything but certain. Changes in injured in clashes with the police and policy choices, in the outcome of events, government troops in the initial uprising in different players and different accidents, lead to Petrograd is estimated around 1,300 people. surprising outcomes. Something like the Russian Revolution was extremely likely in 1917—the The collapse of the Romanov dynasty ushered a Romanov Dynasty was unable to cope with the tumultuous and violent series of events, enormous stresses facing the country—but the culminating in the Bolshevik Party’s seizure of revolution itself could have ended very control in November 1917 and creation of the differently. Soviet Union. The revolution saw some of the most dramatic and dangerous political events the Major questions surround the Provisional world has ever known. It would affect much Government that struggled to manage the chaos more than Russia and the ethnic republics Russia after the Tsar’s abdication.
  • Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: a Comparison

    Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: a Comparison

    WELFARE REFORMS IN POST-SOVIET STATES: A COMPARISON OF SOCIAL BENEFITS REFORM IN RUSSIA AND KAZAKHSTAN by ELENA MALTSEVA A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Elena Maltseva (2012) Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: A Comparison of Social Benefits Reform in Russia and Kazakhstan Elena Maltseva Doctor of Philosophy Political Science University of Toronto (2012) Abstract: Concerned with the question of why governments display varying degrees of success in implementing social reforms, (judged by their ability to arrive at coherent policy outcomes), my dissertation aims to identify the most important factors responsible for the stagnation of social benefits reform in Russia, as opposed to its successful implementation in Kazakhstan. Given their comparable Soviet political and economic characteristics in the immediate aftermath of Communism’s disintegration, why did the implementation of social benefits reform succeed in Kazakhstan, but largely fail in Russia? I argue that although several political and institutional factors did, to a certain degree, influence the course of social benefits reform in these two countries, their success or failure was ultimately determined by the capacity of key state actors to frame the problem and form an effective policy coalition that could further the reform agenda despite various political and institutional obstacles and socioeconomic challenges. In the case of Kazakhstan, the successful implementation of the social benefits reform was a result of a bold and skillful endeavour by Kazakhstani authorities, who used the existing conditions to justify the reform initiative and achieve the reform’s original objectives.
  • Transformation of Stereotypical Perception of „The Image of Poles” in the Russian Empire Society During the World War I

    Transformation of Stereotypical Perception of „The Image of Poles” in the Russian Empire Society During the World War I

    The Person and the Challenges Volume 7 (2017) Number 2, p. 151–164 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15633/pch.2188 Olga Bilobrovets Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Ukraine Transformation of stereotypical perception of „the image of Poles” in the Russian Empire society during the World War I Abstract The cohabitation of different nations in the border of one state creates certain ethnic, social, mental collective nation’s image which changes very slowly. These processes are enhanced during the global historical processes with significant devastating effects which lead to an alteration in public consciousness. During World War І, under the influence of the external crisis circumstances, the necessity to take into account the strategic interests and fundamental values of the nations involved in the war, led to a change in perception of the image of the Pole. The image of a Pole as a disloyal person to Russian statehood had changed into the image of a true confederate in the mutual striving with the enemy. Perception of the Poles as partners in state‑building and international cohabitation became possible only due to global geopolitical changes, the policy of powerful nations, including the Polish territory and the ability of Polish political powers to consolidate their efforts around the idea of statehood restoration. Keywords Russian Empire, the image of the Pole, loyalty, World War І. The Person and the Challenges 152 Volume 7 (2017) Number 2, p. 151–164 1. Introduction The cohabitation of different nations in the border of one state always has its own features caused, among other things, by their status, historical circumstances and conditions of development.
  • Jan Sobczak Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsarevich of Russia

    Jan Sobczak Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsarevich of Russia

    Jan Sobczak Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsarevich of Russia Echa Przeszłości 12, 143-156 2011 ECHA PRZESZŁOŚCI XII, 2011 ISSN 1509-9873 Jan Sobczak ALEXEI NIKOLAEVICH, TSAREVICH OF RUSSIA This article does not aspire to give an exhaustive account of the life of Alexei Nikolaevich, not only for reasons of limited space. The role played by the young lad who was much loved by the nation, became the Russian tsesarevich and was murdered at the tender age of 14, would not justify such an effort. In addition to delivering general biographical information about Alexei that can be found in a variety of sources, I will attempt to throw some light on the less known aspects of his life that profoundly affected the fate of the Russian Empire and brought tragic consequences for the young imperial heir1. Alexei Nikolaevich was born in Peterhof on 12 August (30 July) 1904 on Friday at noon, during an unusually hot summer that had started already in February, at the beginning of Russia’s much unfortunate war against Japan. Alexei was the fifth child and the only son of Nicholas II and Alexandra Feodorovna. He had four older sisters who were the Grand Duchesses: Olga (8.5 years older than Alexei), Tatiana (7 years older), Maria (5 years older) and Anastasia (3 years older). In line with the law of succession, Alexei automatically became heir to the throne, and his birth was heralded to the public by a 300-gun salute from the Peter and Paul Fortress. According to Nicholas II, the imperial heir was named Alexei to break away from a nearly century-old tradition of naming the oldest sons Alexander and Nicholas and to commemorate Peter the Great’s father, Alexei Mikhailovich, the second tsar of the Romanov dynasty that had ruled over Russia for nearly 300 years from the 17th century.
  • East View Research Collections: Ukrainian Studies

    East View Research Collections: Ukrainian Studies

    East View Research Collections: Ukrainian Studies East View produces a variety of valuable collections for researchers and graduate-level students in Ukrainian studies. Covering the period from 1830 to 1945, the collections include primary source documents on uprisings against the Russian Empire; the Prosvita Society (a pro-Ukrainian cultural organization); the Stolypin assassination; the short-lived government and secret police of Hetman Skoropadsky; Ukraine under Nazi occupation; and more. Collections are available online, in full-image, text-searchable files, providing researchers with convenient access to rare, primary source materials. See below for detailed collection descriptions; please inquire for pricing and availability. Collection Spotlight: The Chernobyl Files, Declassified Documents of the Ukrainian KGB The Chernobyl Files collection contains reports prepared for and by a variety of Russian and Ukrainian government agencies, including the KGB, that document and detail the most important developments in the wake of the disaster, as well as internal reports and investigations on its various causes. Learn more at https://www.eastview.com/resources/e-collections/chernobyl-files/ Collection Spotlight: Judaica Digital Collections Features a collection of eight resources from the State Archives of Kyiv Oblast’, covering the period from the Russian Empire of the 1850s to the early Soviet era of the 1920s. The collections include documentation from important historical events, such as Kyiv’s Bloody October of 1905 and the Beilis Case. Topics covered include: emigration from Ukraine, before and during the Soviet era; anti-Semitic groups, ethnic tension and the resulting pogroms; Jewish societies and education programs; and more. Learn more at https://www.eastview.com/resources/e-collections/judaica-digital-collections/ Other Featured Collections Assassination of Russian Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin, 1911.
  • Background Guide, and to Issac and Stasya for Being Great Friends During Our Weird Chicago Summer

    Background Guide, and to Issac and Stasya for Being Great Friends During Our Weird Chicago Summer

    Russian Duma 1917 (DUMA) MUNUC 33 ONLINE 1 Russian Duma 1917 (DUMA) | MUNUC 33 Online TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ CHAIR LETTERS………………………….….………………………….……..….3 ROOM MECHANICS…………………………………………………………… 6 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM………………………….……………..…………......9 HISTORY OF THE PROBLEM………………………………………………………….16 ROSTER……………………………………………………….………………………..23 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………..…………….. 46 2 Russian Duma 1917 (DUMA) | MUNUC 33 Online CHAIR LETTERS ____________________________________________________ My Fellow Russians, We stand today on the edge of a great crisis. Our nation has never been more divided, more war- stricken, more fearful of the future. Yet, the promise and the greatness of Russia remains undaunted. The Russian Provisional Government can and will overcome these challenges and lead our Motherland into the dawn of a new day. Out of character. To introduce myself, I’m a fourth-year Economics and History double major, currently writing a BA thesis on World War II rationing in the United States. I compete on UChicago’s travel team and I additionally am a CD for our college conference. Besides that, I am the VP of the Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity, previously a member of an all-men a cappella group and a proud procrastinator. This letter, for example, is about a month late. We decided to run this committee for a multitude of reasons, but I personally think that Russian in 1917 represents such a critical point in history. In an unlikely way, the most autocratic regime on Earth became replaced with a socialist state. The story of this dramatic shift in government and ideology represents, to me, one of the most interesting parts of history: that sometimes facts can be stranger than fiction.
  • Scripting the Revolutionary Worker Autobiography: Archetypes, Models, Inventions, and Marketsã

    Scripting the Revolutionary Worker Autobiography: Archetypes, Models, Inventions, and Marketsã

    IRSH 49 (2004), pp. 371–400 DOI: 10.1017/S0020859004001725 # 2004 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis Scripting the Revolutionary Worker Autobiography: Archetypes, Models, Inventions, and Marketsà Diane P. Koenker Summary: This essay offers approaches to reading worker autobiographies as a genre as well as source of historical ‘‘data’’. It focuses primarily on one example of worker narrative, the autobiographical notes of Eduard M. Dune, recounting his experiences in the Russian Revolution and civil war, and argues that such texts cannot be utilized even as ‘‘data’’ without also appreciating the ways in which they were shaped and constructed. The article proposes some ways to examine the cultural constructions of such documents, to offer a preliminary typology of lower- class autobiographical statements for Russia and the Soviet Union, and to offer some suggestions for bringing together the skills of literary scholars and historians to the task of reading workers’ autobiographies. In the proliferation of the scholarly study of the autobiographical genre in the past decades, the autobiographies of ‘‘common people’’ have received insignificant attention. Autobiography, it has been argued, is a bourgeois genre, the artifact of the development of modern liberal individualism, the product of individuals with leisure and education to contemplate their selfhood in the luxury of time.1 Peasants, particularly during the time of ‘‘motionless history’’, are judged to constitute ‘‘anti-autobiographical space’’. Workers, whether agricultural,
  • Venäjän Pitkä Vuosisata 1900–2008 Sitran Raportteja 78

    Venäjän Pitkä Vuosisata 1900–2008 Sitran Raportteja 78

    Venäjä on aina ajankohtainen – hyvässä ja näkökulman naapurin monipolviseen ja Muodonmuutoksia pahassa. Krimin sodan jälkeen Aleksanteri II ristiriitaiseen kehitykseen. Tämän risti- avasi tien uudistuksille ja suuriruhtinas- riitaisen historian rakenteisiin Torvalds kunnan enemmistön kielellisille oikeuksille. pureutuu ja yrittää löytää sen järjen, jonka Seuraava hallitsija ryhtyi venäläistämään olemassaolon runoilija ja ulkoministeriön imperiumin alusmaita. Sitä seuraava johti virkamies Fjedor Tjutšev kielsi. maansa sotaan Japania vastaan. Onneton sota oli kuitenkin Suomelle onnellinen – Kaukasuksen elokuinen sota 2008 nosti sekä taloudellisesti että poliittisesti. taas nämä ristiriitaisuudet esille. Tätä samaa kaavaa tapahtumat ovat noudattaneet senkin jälkeen. Onneton vallankumous 1917 avasi mahdollisuuksien ikkunan suuriruhtinaskunnalle, jolla ei enää ollut suuriruhtinasta. Venäjän/Neuvostoliiton heikkoudet ovat muuttuneet Suomen mahdollisuuksiksi niin kaupassa ja teollisuudessa kuin kansainvälisessä politiikassakin. Samalla naapurin ratkaisut ovat muodostuneet Suomen politiikan haasteiksi. Venäjä/Neuvostoliitto on myös jakanut mielipiteitä eikä tämä jako mitenkään ole Muodonmuutoksia noudattanut tavallisia poliittisia rajoja. Venäjän pitkä vuosisata 1900–2008 Nils Torvalds on toiminut Yleisradion ruotsinkielisen toiminnan kirjeenvaihta- jana sekä Moskovassa että Washingto- nissa. Laaja kokemus sekä intohimoinen Nils Torvalds historianharrastus on antanut hyvän Sitran raportteja 78 Sitran raportteja Suomen itsenäisyyden juhlarahasto
  • Simplified Study Packet Version Russian Revolution

    Simplified Study Packet Version Russian Revolution

    Simplified Study Packet Version Russian Revolution 471. Give a brief description of Russia just before and during World War I? Nicholas II was a kind ruler. Perhaps, too kind to rule a nation struggling through a war. His wife, who was more commanding, seems to have controlled him at times. Unfortunately, she was unpopular, particularly after she started to allow Rasputin to come into the court circles. 472. Who initially led the government of Russia after the fall of the Czar? Alexander Kerensky 473. What was probably one of the main reasons Kerensky fell from power? He sought to keep Russia in the war, whereas most Russians were suffering and wanted to end the war. 474. What Communist slogan appealed to the masses? Bread, Land, Peace 475. What Treaty between the Bolsheviks and the Germans pulled Russia out of the war? The Treaty of Brest Litovsk 476. How did the Bolsheviks unwittingly help to defeat the Germans? The Bolsheviks who now ruled Russia, delayed signing a peace treaty with Germany, forcing the Germans to keep troops in Russia for too long. By the time the Germans transferred their troops to the West, it was too late. 477. Give a brief description of the German government’s dealings with Lenin? They sent him back to Russia in a sealed train and gave him money in the hopes that his Bolshevik party, which opposed the war, would help to take Russia out of the war. 478. In what month did the October Revolution occur? November, It was October by the Russian calendar.
  • The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama

    The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama

    The Secret School of War: The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ian Johnson Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Master's Examination Committee: Jennifer Siegel, Advisor Peter Mansoor David Hoffmann Copyright by Ian Ona Johnson 2012 Abstract This paper explores the period of military cooperation between the Weimar Period German Army (the Reichswehr), and the Soviet Union. Between 1922 and 1933, four facilities were built in Russia by the two governments, where a variety of training and technological exercises were conducted. These facilities were particularly focused on advances in chemical and biological weapons, airplanes and tanks. The most influential of the four facilities was the tank testing and training grounds (Panzertruppenschule in the German) built along the Kama River, near Kazan in North- Central Russia. Led by German instructors, the school’s curriculum was based around lectures, war games, and technological testing. Soviet and German students studied and worked side by side; German officers in fact often wore the Soviet uniform while at the school, to show solidarity with their fellow officers. Among the German alumni of the school were many of the most famous practitioners of mobile warfare during the Second World War, such as Guderian, Manstein, Kleist and Model. This system of education proved highly innovative. During seven years of operation, the school produced a number of extremely important technological and tactical innovations. Among the new technologies were a new tank chassis system, superior guns, and - perhaps most importantly- a radio that could function within a tank.
  • Visual Metaphors for the People a Study of Cinematic Propoganda in Sergei Eisenstein’S Film

    Visual Metaphors for the People a Study of Cinematic Propoganda in Sergei Eisenstein’S Film

    VIsual Metaphors for the people A Study of Cinematic Propoganda in Sergei Eisenstein’s Film ashley brown This paper attempTs To undersTand how The celebraTed and conTroversial figure of sergei eisensTein undersTood and conTribuTed To The formaTion of The sovieT union Through his films of The 1920s. The lens of visual meTaphors offer a specific insighT inTo how arTisTic choices of The direcTor were informed by his own pedagogy for The russian revoluTion. The paper asks The quesTions: did eisensTein’s films reflecT The official parTy rheToric? how did They inform or moTivaTe The public Toward The communisT ideology of The early sovieT union? The primary sources used in This pa- per are from The films Strike (1925), BattleShip potemkin (1926), octoBer (1928), and the General line (1929). eisensTein creaTed visual meTaphors Through The juxTaposi- Tion of images in his films which alluded To higher concepTs. a shoT of a worker followed by The shoT of gears Turning creaTed The concepT of indusTry in The minds of The audience. Through visual meTaphors, iT is possible To undersTand The moTives of eisensTein and The communisT parTy. iT is also possible, wiTh The aid of secondary sources, To see how Those moTives differed. “Language is much closer to film than painting is. For example, aimed at the “... organization of the psychology of the in painting the form arises from abstract elements of line and masses.”6 Works about Eisenstein in the field of film color, while in cinema the material concreteness of the image theory examine Eisenstein’s career in theater, the evolution within the frame presents—as an element—the greatest of his approach to montage, and his artistic expression.7 difficulty in manipulation.