DOCSLIB.ORG

Analyzing the Revolution and NATO Action in Light of the UN Charter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analyzing the Revolution and NATO Action in Light of the UN Charter Emory International Law Review Volume 30 Issue 3 2016 Ukraine: Analyzing the Revolution and NATO Action in Light of the U.N. Charter and Nicaragua Matthew Emery Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr Recommended Citation Matthew Emery, Ukraine: Analyzing the Revolution and NATO Action in Light of the U.N. Charter and Nicaragua, 30 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 433 (2016). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol30/iss3/3 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory International Law Review by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EMERY GALLEYSPROOFS2 2/24/2016 11:25 AM UKRAINE: ANALYZING THE REVOLUTION AND NATO ACTION IN LIGHT OF THE U.N. CHARTER AND NICARAGUA ABSTRACT Ukraine has been in a precarious position since its independence in 1991. It has been in the midst of an identity crisis. The eastern part of the country is partial to Russia, while the western half of the country prefers to be politically aligned with Europe. Since 2014, Ukraine has been wrought with a political coup, civil unrest in the Donbass region, and subject to Russian aggression. The current Ukrainian government established in wake of the coup is attempting to quell the uprisings from dissenters and Russian forces in the eastern part of the country, and NATO has diplomatically supported the current Ukrainian government. However, Ukraine is not a member of NATO, thus the country cannot avail itself of collective defense as set out in Article 5 of the NATO Treaty. This Comment argues that any assistance from NATO countries to the current Ukrainian government would violate the International Court of Justice’s decision in Nicaragua v. United States because the current government is illegitimate. INTRODUCTION Ukraine is in the midst of a tug of war and has been since 1991. European influence pulls the country in one direction, while Russian influence pulls it in the opposite direction. Throughout 2014, Ukraine was divided by political revolution and was placed under political and military pressure by Russia. Russia has annexed the Crimean peninsula and there is some evidence that it has fomented rebellion in eastern Ukraine.1 These events have resulted in the highest tensions between Russia and the West since the height of the Cold War. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), one of the most formidable collective defense organizations in the world, has held special sessions addressing Ukraine, fearful of Russia’s advancing and escalating aggression toward NATO members, and the United States has decided to place embargos on Russia.2 1 See infra Part II. 2 See, e.g., Doug Schoen, New U.S. Sanctions on Russia Go Further Than Ever Before, FORBES (July 17, 2014), http://www.forbes.com/sites/dougschoen/2014/07/17/new-us-sanctions-against-russia-go-further-than-ever- EMERY GALLEYSPROOFS2 2/24/2016 11:25 AM 434 EMORY INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW [Vol. 30 Furthermore, the United States and other NATO members have supplied Ukraine with weapons in an effort to thwart Russia’s advances.3 Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty permits NATO to engage in collective military defense on behalf of its members, but since Ukraine is not a member, NATO may not intervene militarily on behalf of the country.4 Ukraine is already internally divided as a result of former President Viktor Yanukovych’s ouster and the subsequent establishment of a new governmental regime.5 Additionally, Russia’s incursions and annexation of Ukrainian territory marked the first time since World War II that a country has invaded sovereign territory in Eastern Europe.6 NATO allies are fearful that Russian aggression will ultimately divide the Ukrainian state, resulting in a revival of Cold War tensions. NATO is hesitant to sit on its hands as Russia encroaches on its members, and it will look to support Ukraine as best it can. The world is watching NATO and Russia, as it is the next great geopolitical chess game to invoke the legal limits of a collective defense organization’s resort to force. This is the situational crisis the West never hoped to see. Prior to examining the legal ramifications of this crisis, it is imperative to set the historical and political stage. To approach the current Ukrainian crisis, Ukraine-Russian relations, and the interplay of NATO action, Part I of this Comment begins with a historical analysis of Ukraine and its connection to Russia. In order to fully understand where we are and where we are going, we must understand how we got here. While that expression is somewhat cliché, it exhibits unwavering truth. Part II of this Comment provides a brief historical analysis that will elucidate why Russians feel so strongly about Ukraine and portrays how the events that unfolded over the past several years are symptoms of deeper historical tensions between the two countries. After examining Ukraine’s historical inception, this Comment analyzes the events that unfolded in Ukraine over the final months of 2013 and all of 2014. Part III of this Comment examines what NATO countries may do to defend a non-NATO country, especially when its fall is of crucial consequence to before/; see also NATO Summit to Highlight Unity Against Russia, AL JAZEERA (Sept. 4, 2014), http://www. aljazeera.com/news/europe/2014/09/nato-summit-highlight-unity-against-russia-20149445948732370.html. 3 NATO Members ‘start arms deliveries to Ukraine,’ BBC NEWS (Sept. 14, 2014), http://www.bbc.com/ news/world-europe-29198497. 4 North Atlantic Treaty art. 5, Apr. 4, 1949, 63 Stat. 2241, 34 U.N.T.S. 243. 5 See infra Part II.A. 6 Will Englund, Kremlin Says Crimea Is Now Officially Part of Russia After Treaty Signing, Putin Speech, WASH. POST (Mar. 18, 2014), http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/russias-putin-prepares-to-annex- crimea/2014/03/18/933183b2-654e-45ce-920e-4d18c0ffec73_story.html. EMERY GALLEYSPROOFS2 2/24/2016 11:25 AM 2016] ANALYZING THE REVOLUTION AND NATO ACTION 435 nearby NATO countries. In other words, how much may NATO intervene on behalf of a non-NATO country? Part IV of this Comment examines the various legal issues involved in this crisis. It first examines the justifications for the use of force and then analyzes NATO’s actions and purported justifications with respect to the use of force in Kosovo in 1999. It then examines whether the new Ukrainian government, established in the wake of the 2014 revolution, is legitimate. The question of legitimacy has profound implications for whether NATO countries may provide the current Ukrainian government with weapons to secure its power and legitimacy over the eastern part of the country.7 If the government is not legitimate, then the United States and other NATO countries, in the contribution of arms and training of soldiers to and for the current Ukrainian government, would be in violation of the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) decision in Nicaragua v. United States.8 Part V of this Comment examines whether eastern Ukraine is being denied the right of self- determination and can thus engage in external self-determination to unite with Russia, a country with which it has closer ethnic, cultural, and political ties. As a general proposition, Nicaragua stipulates that it is illegal for a state to intervene on behalf of a rebel group for the purpose of overthrowing a legitimate state government unless it is a war of national liberation.9 A war of national liberation is generally seen as legitimate because it is closely connected to the right of self-determination.10 In terms of Ukraine, the issue is whether the United States and other NATO countries may be violating Nicaragua by intervening on behalf of a government that is not legitimate. The current Ukrainian government is not what one would usually think of as rebels, but it was placed into power as a result of a revolution. Western Ukrainians vehemently rebelled against the prior government’s political decisions, and the protests quickly developed into revolution and ouster of the President.11 There was an immediate change of power with little regard for due process, and there 7 See generally Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), Merits, 1986 I.C.J. 14 (June 27). 8 See id. ¶¶ 239–45 (explaining that the United States intended to overthrow the government of Nicaragua by way of supporting and assisting rebels whose purpose was to overthrow its government, which amounts to an intervention that constitutes a clear breach of the principle of non-intervention firmly rooted in international law). 9 See id.; see also PETER MALANCZUK, AKEHURST’S MODERN INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LAW 336 (Routledge, 7th ed. 1997). 10 Nicar. v. U.S., 1986 I.C.J. ¶¶ 239–45. 11 See infra Part II.A. EMERY GALLEYSPROOFS2 2/24/2016 11:25 AM 436 EMORY INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW [Vol. 30 was little justification for a revolution of such scale.12 The current government is trying to take control over the entirety of the country, mainly through suppressing dissenters in eastern Ukraine.13 Although the current government is already in power and NATO did not assist in overthrowing the prior regime, NATO is attempting to help assert and establish the current government’s legitimacy. In short, the West wants this current government in power for political reasons and weapons are being given to suppress the protesters in eastern Ukraine. I. HISTORICAL, CULTURAL, AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    Constitution of Ukraine Preamble The Verkhovna Rada (the Parliament) of Ukraine on behalf of the Ukrainian people - Ukrainian citizens of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, relying on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and upon the right to self- determination realised by the Ukrainian nation, all the Ukrainian people, aspiring to ensure human rights and freedoms, and life conditions worthy of human dignity, supporting the strengthening of civil harmony on the Ukrainian soil, striving to develop and strengthen a democratic, social, law-based state, realizing the responsibility in the eyes of God, before our own conscience, past, present and future generations, guided by the Act of Declaration of the Independence of Ukraine of 24 August 1991, approved by the national vote on 1 December 1991, adopts this Constitution as the Fundamental Law of Ukraine. Title I General Principles Article 1. Ukraine shall be a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, law-based state. Article 2. The sovereignty of Ukraine shall extend throughout its entire territory. Ukraine shall be a unitary state. The territory of Ukraine within its present borders shall be indivisible and inviolable. Article 3. An individual, his life and health, honour and dignity, inviolability and security shall be recognised in Ukraine as the highest social value. Human rights and freedoms, and guarantees thereof shall determine the essence and course of activities of the State. The State shall be responsible to the individual for its activities. Affirming and ensuring human rights and freedoms shall be the main duty of the State. Article 4. There shall be a single form of citizenship in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issues of Military Spec
    CURRENT ISSUES OF MILITARY SPECIALISTS TRAINING IN THE SECURITY AND DEFENCE SECTOR UNDER CONDITIONS OF HYBRID THREATS Instytut Bezpieczeństwa i Rozwoju Międzynarodowego Boguslaw Pacek, Hennadii Pievtsov, Anatolii Syrotenko CURRENT ISSUES OF MILITARY SPECIALISTS TRAINING IN THE SECURITY AND DEFENCE SECTOR UNDER CONDITIONS OF HYBRID THREATS Warsaw 2021 Reviewer Prof. dr hab. Andrzej Glen Scientific editors: Boguslaw Pacek – Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland Hennadii Pievtsov – Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University, Ukraine Anatolii Syrotenko – National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi, Ukraine Language editing and proofreading Foreign Languages Scientific and Research Centre of National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi Computer typing Valeriya Kirvas © Copyright by Instytut Bezpieczeństwa i Rozwoju Międzynarodowego, 2021 ISBN 978-83-66676-10-7 Wydawnictwo Instytutu Bezpieczeństwa i Rozwoju Międzynarodowego https://instytutbirm.pl 1st Edition CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................... 10 Military Scientific Aspects of Counteracting Hybrid Aggression: the Experience of Ukraine Victor Bocharnikov, Sergey Sveshnikov Systemic features of military-political situation in Ukraine during 2012-2018 ............................................................ 14 Volodymyr Bohdanovych, Oleksandr Dublian, Oleksandr Peredrii, Valerii Dobrohurskyi Comprehensive model of counteracting hybrid aggression process
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Data Protection
    Personal data protection Notification on the procedure of personal data processing and the rights of personal data subjects According to Articles 8, 12 of the Law of Ukraine On Protection of Personal Data №2297-VI of June 1, 2010 Raiffeisen Bank Aval Joint Stock Company (hereinafter – Bank) hereby notifies about the rights of personal data subjects, on the procedure for processing of the personal data and personal data protection requests applied by the Bank. The Bank provides the processing and protection of personal data according to the requirements of the Constitution of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine on Protection of Personal Data, other regulatory acts of Ukraine, Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data and international treaties of Ukraine. During its activities the Bank applies the procedure of personal data protection in compliance with the requirements of the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2016/679 of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter – GDPR). Processing of the personal data constituting the banking secrecy is carried out by the Bank in compliance with the requirements of the Law of Ukraine On Banks and Banking and the regulatory acts of the National Bank of Ukraine. The Bank processes the personal data of its customers, contractors, shareholders, employees, related persons, as well as the personal data of other private individuals, received by the Bank while carrying out banking and other activities according to the law of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Transition from Soviet To
    Ukraine’s Transition from Soviet to Post-Soviet Law: Property as a Lesson in Failed Regulation Paul Babie Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide Abstract: This article traces the parallel developments oF the Ukrainian transition from Soviet to post-Soviet law and From state to private property. To do this, the article is divided into Four parts. The First examines the transition oF the Ukrainian legal system from pre-Soviet to post-Soviet law. The second traces the microcosm oF that transition as it occurred through the Failed adoption oF private property introduced in the law of post-Soviet Ukraine. The third demonstrates that the Flawed approach by which private property has been adopted, with little iF any real and efFective regulation in post-independence Ukraine, has produced negative consequences For the Ukrainian people. The Final part concludes. Keywords: Ukrainian Law, Soviet Law, Civil Law, Post-Soviet Law, Property, Obligation, Regulation I. INTRODUCTION: WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DECADE MAKES n 2004 I wrote that Ukraine’s “Orange Revolution” of 2004-2005 I demonstrated Ukraine’s commitment to breaking ties with its Soviet socialist past and to establishing itselF Fully as a capitalist market economy (Babie, “Morality oF Private Property” 271). How wrong could I be; it almost seems as though nothing has changed since immediately beFore the Orange Revolution. Indeed, in the ten years since, Ukraine has been the very model of how a nation can get it all so wrong in attempting to make the transition from socialism to capitalism (assuming, of course, one wants to make that transition).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2007, No.15
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: • Ruslana Lyzhychko speaks in Washington — page 3. • On the road to Chornobyl — page 9. • “Extreme” skiing in Ukraine’s Carpathians — centerfold. HE KRAINIAN EEKLY T PublishedU by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profitW association Vol. LXXV No. 15 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, APRIL 15, 2007 $1/$2 in Ukraine National University Political stalemate in Ukraine leads to talk of compromise by Zenon Zawada of Kyiv Mohyla Academy Kyiv Press Bureau KYIV – Caught in a stalemate, strengthens ties with U.S. President Viktor Yushchenko and Prime CHICAGO – The National University Minister Viktor Yanukovych have begun of Kyiv Mohyla Academy recently attempts at reaching compromise in enlarged its contacts and support in the Ukraine’s political crisis, privately United States through an information exchanging lists of proposals and negoti- campaign and fund-raising drive aimed ating points. at expanding the university’s programs In the most significant effort so far, with U.S. institutions and building a Mr. Yushchenko offered on April 10 to more financially secure base for the delay pre-term parliamentary elections future. beyond the scheduled May 27 date, A total of $350,000 was raised during which is widely viewed as unrealistic. a three-week period when the Kyiv He insisted, however, that pre-term elec- Mohyla Foundation of America hosted tions were the only way out of the crisis, the university president, Dr. Viacheslav and he said he expects concessions. Briukhovetsky, at events in the Ukrainian The overture didn’t impress Mr. communities of Washington, northern Yanukovych, who maintained the presi- dent should withdraw his April 2 decree New Jersey, Philadelphia, Detroit and UNIAN/Andrii Mosiyenko Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • “THE PRICE of FREEDOM” Summary of the Public Report of Human Rights Organizations on Crimes Against Humanity Committed Durin
    “THE PRICE OF FREEDOM” Summary of the public report of human rights organizations on crimes against humanity committed during the period of Euromaidan (November 2013 – February 2014) 1. Causes of Euromaidan protest movement. Following the election of Viktor Yanukovych as a President of Ukraine in February 2010, the group in power started to centralize control over the country. It is not by chance that in October 2010 the Constitutional Court of Ukraine took a decision on restoring the Constitution of 1996 with a whole range of additional presidential powers1. The strengthening of authoritarian regime was accompanied by worsening social and economic conditions and increased poverty of population. The unprecedented scale of corruption led to the loss of credibility by key state institutions, discontent and public protests. The state authorities considered rights and freedoms such as freedom of expression, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, the right to fair trial, and the right to private life to be a threat to development and existence of the authoritarian rule. Consequently, the following year human rights organizations reported systemic attacks on rights and fundamental freedoms2 by the government, as well as the return to the infamous practice of political persecutions3. Opposition politicians4, journalists5, human rights defenders, public activists6, and active youth became victims of repressions. Both legal means (unlawful arrests, fabricated 1 In 2011, the Constitutional Court unlawfully cancelled amendments to the Constitution adopted in 2004 and restored the Constitution of 1997. This Constitution provided for broad presidential powers. 2 See Annual human rights report Human rights in Ukraine – 2012, http://helsinki.org.ua/en/index.php?r=3.3.1.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion of the Venice Commission CDL-AD(2015)026
    Strasbourg, 26 October 2015 CDL-AD(2015)026 Or. Engl. Opinion No. 803/2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE REGARDING THE JUDICIARY AS PROPOSED BY THE WORKING GROUP OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSION IN JULY 2015 Endorsed by the Venice Commission At its 104th Plenary Session (Venice, 23-24 October 2015) On the basis of comments by Ms Regina KIENER (Member, Switzerland) Mr Peter PACZOLAY (Honorary President) Mr George PAPUASHVILI (Member, Georgia) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (Substitute member, Belgium) Ms Hanna SUCHOCKA (Member, Poland) Mr Evgeni TANCHEV (Member, Bulgaria) Mr Kaarlo TUORI (Member, Finland) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2015)026 - 2 - I. Introduction 1. By decree 119/2015 of 3 March 2015, the President of Ukraine, Mr Petro Poroshenko, established the Constitutional Commission of Ukraine with the task of preparing amendments to the current Constitution. Ms Hanna Suchocka, member of the Venice Commission, was appointed by the President as an international observer on the Constitutional Commission. Three working groups were established, one of which deals with the judiciary. 2. At the Plenary Session of 20-21 June 2015, the Venice Commission authorised the rapporteurs to send a preliminary opinion on the draft constitutional amendments, including on the judiciairy, to the Ukrainian authorities prior to its adoption by the Commission at its next plenary session. 3. On
    [Show full text]
  • Elections, Revolution and Democracy in Ukraine
    ELECTIONS, REVOLUTION AND DEMOCRACY IN UKRAINE: REFLECTIONS ON A COUNTRY’S TURN TO DEMOCRACY, FREE ELECTIONS AND THE MODERN WORLD By Jeffrey Clark With Jason Stout October 2005 DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES: STRENGTHENING ELECTORAL ADMINISTRATION IN UKRAINE PROJECT This publication was made possible through support provided by the Regional Mission for Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova, U.S. Agency for International Development, under the terms of Agreement No. 121-A-00- 04-00701-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development. PREFACE A USAID-supported activity known as the Strengthening Electoral Administration in Ukraine Project (SEAUP), administered by Development Associates, played a decidedly important role in facilitating Ukraine’s turn to democracy in 2004. The pages that follow provide evidence of that unequivocal conclusion, but just as importantly offer reflections on how the project was perceived and implemented of interest to promoters of free elections and democratization elsewhere. SEAUP’s success would have been unattainable without the unwavering support USAID gave the initiative and the trust placed in its professional staff. The Kyiv Mission granted considerable administrative flexibility that proved essential as political tensions increased and unplanned program inputs had to be devised virtually overnight to meet the challenges of a massively fraudulent vote and a court-ordered revote. The efforts of external players to foment anti-American sentiments further complicated the environment and imposed additional constraints on project implementers. USAID sponsored other implementing agencies actively supporting democratic consolidation in Ukraine, working directly with NDI, IRI, Freedom House, InterNews, and ABA/CEELI.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Constitution of 1996 with Amendments Through 2014
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:52 constituteproject.org Ukraine's Constitution of 1996 with Amendments through 2014 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:52 Table of contents Preamble . 3 Chapter I: General Principles . 3 Chapter II: Human and Citizens' Rights, Freedoms and Duties . 7 Chapter III: Elections; Referendum . 17 Chapter IV: Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine . 18 Chapter V: President of Ukraine . 30 Chapter VI: Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine; Other Bodies of Executive Power . 36 Chapter VII: Procuracy . 40 Chapter VIII: Justice . 40 Chapter IX: Territorial Structure of Ukraine . 44 Chapter X: Autonomous Republic of Crimea . 44 Chapter XI: Local Self-Government . 47 Chapter XII: Constitutional Court of Ukraine . 49 Chapter XIII: Introducing Amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine . 51 Chapter XIV: Final Provisions . 52 Chapter XV: Transitional Provisions . 52 Ukraine 1996 (rev. 2014) Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:52 • Source of constitutional authority • God or other deities Preamble • Motives for writing constitution • Preamble • Right to self determination The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, on behalf of the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, based on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and on the right to self-determination realised
    [Show full text]
  • Opora Final Report on Observation at the 2019 Regular Presidential Elections in Ukraine
    OPORA FINAL REPORT ON OBSERVATION AT THE 2019 REGULAR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN UKRAINE Kyiv― 2020 The publication was made possible due to support of American people pro- vided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Any opinions and statements expressed in this publication may not coin- cide with the official position of USAID and US Government. Authors Oleksandr Kliuzhev Oleksandr Neberykut Olha Kotsiuruba Robert Lorian Iurii Lisovskyi Grygorii Sorochan Endorsed by Olga Aivazovska Translation Svitlana Bregman Design by Viktoria Arkhypenko ISBN 978-617-7142-56-9 © OPORA, 2020 CONTENT ABOUT OPORA OBSERVATION 5 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE REPORT 7 DETAILED SUMMARY 13 ELECTORAL SYSTEM AND ELECTORAL LAW 31 REGISTRATION OF CANDIDATES FOR THE POSITION OF THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE 35 CAMPAIGNING ACTIVITIES OF PARTIES AND CANDIDATES 39 Peculiarities of the early campaigning 40 Format of campaigning activities and early campaigning subjects 41 Campaigning activities of candidates within the electoral process 46 Campaigning activities of candidates during the preparation for the second round of voting 51 ADMINISTRATION OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN UKRAINE 55 CEC operations 56 Formation and activities of district election commissions 64 Establishing district election commissions 64 The first sessions of district election commissions 69 Rotation of the DEC membership 72 Formation of precinct election commissions 72 Launch of operations of precinct election commissions 78 Formation and organization of DEC operations
    [Show full text]
  • (LUSTRATION LAW) of UKRAINE As Would Result from the Amendments
    Venice, 19 June 2015 CDL-AD(2015)012 Opinion No. 788/2014 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) FINAL OPINION ON THE LAW ON GOVERNMENT CLEANSING (LUSTRATION LAW) OF UKRAINE As would result from the amendments submitted to the Verkhovna Rada on 21 April 2015 Adopted by the Venice Commission At its 103rd Plenary Session (Venice, 19-20 June 2015) On the basis of comments by Ms Veronika BÍLKOVÁ (Member, Czech Republic) Mr George PAPUASHVILI (Member, Georgia) Ms Anne PETERS (Substitute Member, Germany) Ms Hanna SUCHOCKA (Member, Poland) Mr Ben VERMEULEN (Member, the Netherlands) Mr Gerhard REISSNER (Expert (DGI), former President of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE)) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2015)012 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Background Information and Facts ................................................................................ 3 II. Applicable Legal Framework ......................................................................................... 4 A. National Legal Framework ......................................................................................... 4 B. International Legal Framework .................................................................................. 5 III. Assessment of the Law on Government Cleansing ....................................................... 6 A. Aims of the Law on Government Cleansing ............................................................... 6
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996 Amended by the Laws of Ukraine № 2222-IV dated December 8, 2004, № 2952-VI dated February 1, 2011, № 586-VII dated September 19, 2013, № 742-VII dated February 21, 2014, № 1401-VIII dated June 2, 2016 № 2680-VIII dated February 7, 2019 The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, on behalf of the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, based on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and on the right to self-determination realised by the Ukrainian nation, all the Ukrainian people, providing for the guarantee of human rights and freedoms and of the worthy conditions of human life, caring for the strengthening of civil harmony on Ukrainian soil, and confirming the European identity of the Ukrainian people and the irreversibility of the European and Euro-Atlantic course of Ukraine, striving to develop and strengthen a democratic, social, law-based state, aware of responsibility before God, our own conscience, past, present and future generations, guided by the Act of Declaration of the Independence of Ukraine of August 24, 1991, approved by the national vote on December 1, 1991, adopts this Constitution - the Fundamental Law of Ukraine. Chapter I General Principles Article 1 Ukraine is a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, law-based state. Article 2 The sovereignty of Ukraine extends throughout its entire territory. Ukraine is a unitary state. The territory of Ukraine within its present border is indivisible and inviolable. Article 3 The human being, his or her life and health, honour and dignity, inviolability and security are recognised in Ukraine as the highest social value.
    [Show full text]