DOCSLIB.ORG

Indochina, the Vietnam War, and the Mayaguez Incident

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indochina, the Vietnam War, and the Mayaguez Incident Defining a War: Indochina, the Vietnam War, and the Mayaguez Incident Lieutenant Colonel Michael Hunter Marine Corps History, Volume 6, Number 2, Winter 2020, pp. 72-90 (Article) Published by Marine Corps University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/796393/summary [ Access provided at 2 Oct 2021 03:15 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Defining a War: INDOCHINA, THE VIETNAM WAR, AND THE MAYAGUEZ INCIDENT by Lieutenant Colonel Michael Hunter, USA Abstract: Only two weeks after the fall of Saigon in May 1975, Khmer Rouge forces seized the American mer- chant ship SS Mayaguez (1944) off the Cambodian coast, setting up a Marine rescue and recovery battle on the island of Koh Tang. This battle on 12–15 May 1975 was the final U.S. military episode amid the wider Second Indochina War. The term Vietnam War has impeded a proper understanding of the wider war in the American consciousness, leading many to disassociate the Mayaguez incident from the Vietnam War, though they belong within the same historical frame. This article seeks to provide a heretofore unseen historical argument con- necting the Mayaguez incident to the wider war and to demonstrate that Mayaguez and Koh Tang veterans are Vietnam veterans, relying on primary sources from the Ford administration, the papers of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, and interviews with veterans. Keywords: Vietnam, Cambodia, veterans, memory, Mayaguez, the Wall, Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, Koh Tang, Koh Tang Mayaguez Veterans Organization, Gerald R. Ford, Henry A. Kissinger, James R. Schlesinger, U.S. Marine Corps, Admiral Noel A. M. Gayler ometimes regulation fails to match reality. With second- and third-degree burns, Trebil floated “What are you wearing?!” the indignant colo- out to sea before being scooped up by a supporting U.S. Snel demanded while poking the lance corporal’s Navy ship. The Purple Heart was the only ribbon he chest. In the fall of 1975, young Timothy W. Trebil had rated, a highly unusual circumstance for a junior en- a problem after arriving in Quantico, Virginia, from listed Marine in 1975. After Trebil hastily spurted an Okinawa for temporary duty—but it was not clear explanation justifying his Purple Heart, the colonel re- why as he stood locked at attention. directed his fire at what was missing: “Nobody wears “Sir, the lance corporal is wearing his—” that ribbon by itself. Nobody rates just that ribbon— “No. I’m talking about that ribbon!” It was Trebil’s wait here.” He took Trebil’s service record brief, the Purple Heart. He earned it earlier that May during the proof of his existence in the Corps, and stormed off to SS Mayaguez container ship rescue, only two weeks af- remedy the situation.1 ter South Vietnam’s collapse. The Cambodian Khmer President Dwight D. Eisenhower authorized the Rouge shot down Trebil’s helicopter in May 1975 as it National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) in Executive attempted to land assaulting U.S. Marines on Koh Tang Order 10448 on 22 April 1953 as a blanket recognition Island, where the ship’s crew was supposedly captive. medal for military personnel serving at a time of na- tional emergency, though not necessarily in a combat 2 LtCol Michael Hunter, USA, is an Army strategist assigned to Head- zone. According to the 1973 Paris Peace Accords, U.S. quarters, Department of the Army, G-3/5/7, Strategy, Plans, and Policy Directorate; and holds a master’s degree in history from Georgetown University. He is a veteran of the Global War on Terrorism with a re- 1 Timothy Trebil, 2d Battalion, 9th Regiment veteran, interview with search interest in veterans’ history. author, 10 November 2017, Arlington, VA, hereafter Trebil interview. https://doi.org/10.35318/mch.2020060204 2 Exec. Order No. 10448, 3 C.F.R., 1949–1953 Comp., 935. 72 WINTER 2020 73 Official U.S. Air Force photo 090424-F-1234P-028, courtesy of the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force Unidentified U.S. Marines run from a Sikorsky HH-53C Jolly Green Giant helicopter of the 40th Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Squadron during the assault on Koh Tang Island to rescue the U.S. merchant ship Mayaguez and its crew, 15 May 1975. combat operations in Vietnam ended on 28 January had two ribbons to his name: the Purple Heart and 1973, but the Department of Defense (DOD) kept is- NDSM.3 suing the NDSM to servicemembers for the national Popular conception, national narratives, and emergency of the Vietnam War until 14 August 1974. wartime decoration regulations do not always match Trebil joined the Marine Corps in September 1974, individual historical experiences. In addition to not missing the regulatory cutoff date. The incongruity warranting the NDSM, the fighting on and around between Trebil’s combat experience, exemplified by Koh Tang—contested by the new revolutionary gov- the Purple Heart, and the absence of other awards ernments of Vietnam and Cambodia—from 12 to 15 for wartime or emergency service troubled the colo- May 1975 also failed to merit the green, yellow, or nel. Although existing regulations said Trebil had not red Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). Perhaps the most served during a period of national emergency, the iconic ribbon from the United States’ nearly 20-year colonel reconciled the regulation’s intent with Trebil’s military effort in Indochina, the image of the VSM experience through an impromptu award ceremony at the Marine Corps Commandant’s office. Now Trebil 3 Trebil interview. 74 MARINE CORPS HISTORY VOL. 6, NO. 2 Official U.S. Air Force photo, courtesy of the National Museum of the United States Air Force Container ship SS Mayaguez. now adorns countless black Vietnam veteran hats, United States calls the Vietnam War. But wars are jackets, and memorials across the United States and rarely contained neatly within dates and borders, and serves as a prominent discriminator between those the Vietnam War extended outside the geographical who fought in-country in Vietnam and those who did borders of Vietnam. not.4 The battle on and around Koh Tang to rescue In a narrowly defined policy, service in the the Mayaguez and its crew on the border between Mayaguez rescue operation alone did not warrant the Cambodia and Vietnam was the U.S. military’s final VSM because combat operations ceased in 1973 and episode amid a concurrent wider war for control of President Gerald Ford had officially proclaimed the Indochina—known as the Second Indochina War. Vietnam War over five days before the ship’s seizure.5 France’s colonial exit from Indochina after the 1954 More than 58,000 American servicemembers and Geneva Conference triggered struggles for control hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese, Cambodians, across the region.6 The United States’ main military Laotians, and others lost their lives during what the effort in the Second Indochina War was the fighting in Vietnam, but the term Vietnam War has hindered a 4 Legal and social questions regarding status as a Vietnam veteran or proper understanding of the wider war in the Ameri- Vietnam-era veteran have abounded since at least 1974. For example, see Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act, H.R. 12649, 93d Cong. (1974). 6 Donald Kirk, Wider War: The Struggle for Cambodia, Thailand, and Laos 5 Proclamation No. 4373, Fed. Reg. 20257 (7 May 1975). (New York: Praeger, 1971), 3–15. WINTER 2020 75 Official Department of Defense photo, courtesy of Historical Resources Branch, Marine Corps History Division A Marine and an Air Force pararescueman of the 40th Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Squadron (in wetsuit) run for an Air Force helicopter during an assault on Koh Tang Island to rescue the merchant ship SS Mayaguez and its crew, 15 May 1975. can consciousness. Governments, institutions, and years.7 This article will first review the military and historians frame events for various reasons, among diplomatic events in South Vietnam and Cambodia them political, bureaucratic, and a desire for coher- during the winter and spring of 1975 and comment on ence. The most valid reasons for placing the Vietnam existing interpretations. Next, the article will explain War and the Mayaguez incident within the same frame why some view the Mayaguez incident as distinct from are historical. U.S. military participation within Viet- the Vietnam War/Second Indochina War for political, namese and Cambodian territory in spring 1975 was bureaucratic, and social reasons before demonstrating participation in the same war, not separate conflicts. historical and national memory linkages. This article U.S. decision-makers and military leaders in the re- gion understood this at the time and participants in 7 On the importance of historical memory, see David Thelen, “Memory the Mayaguez incident at various levels remembered and American History,” Journal of American History 75, no. 4 (March and memorialized the connection in the following 1989): 1117–29. 76 MARINE CORPS HISTORY VOL. 6, NO. 2 Official Department of Defense photo, by YN3 Michael Chan, courtesy of Historical Resources Branch, Marine Corps History Division A U.S. Marine from the escort ship USS Harold E. Holt (DE 1074) storm the merchant ship SS Mayaguez to recapture the ship and to rescue the captive crew. No one was aboard the ship and the crew were later returned by a fishing boat. provides a heretofore unseen historical argument con- Rouge, the United States evacuated personnel from necting the Mayaguez incident to the wider war and Phnom Penh, Cambodia’s capital, in Operation Eagle demonstrates that Mayaguez and Koh Tang veterans Pull on 12 April. Similarly, with North Vietnamese are Vietnam veterans.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marine Expeditionary Brigade - Afghanistan
    April 11, 2014 Volume 1, Issue 2 Marine Expeditionary Brigade - Afghanistan Family Newsletter The Command Element of Regional Command (Southwest) in Helmand province, Afghanistan. From the Commander’s Desk: Dear friends and family, This newsletter comes to you just after Afghanistan’s April 5 presidential election, which I’m sure you’ve heard was a tremendous success. While we certainly stood back in a supporting role, every single section on this staff has been focused on the election for many months and has worked tirelessly to train and advise their Afghan security counterparts so they could ensure the election was a secure and successful one. The Afghan people rejected the Taliban and their threats of violence and turned out in large numbers, including female voters, who comprised an estimated 35 percent of the vote. This year seven million voters turned out across Afghanistan, three million more than the last presidential election during 2009. That means 58 percent of the registered voters actually cast a vote, a far higher percentage than we see in U.S. elections. In RC(SW) the news was also positive. This year 209 polling centers were open throughout Helmand and Nimroz provinces, compared to 148 during 2009, and there were an estimated 155,000 more registered voters. In Kajaki District here in Helmand not a vote was cast during 2009, but this year approximately 3,500 voted. Only 177 voted in Sangin District last time, but more than 5,000 voted this year. That is a tremendous measure of success for a district in which the Marine Corps has fought hard and sacrificed much in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Between Vietnam and Afghanistan Wars
    Parallel Between Vietnam and Afghanistan Wars Muhammad Karim * Abstract After the announcement of new US strategy for Afghanistan by President Trump’s administration, the Afghan War now resembles that of concluding phase of the Vietnam War. At the end of the Vietnam War, the United States widened the war zone to spread it to Cambodia and Laos. Since last few months, US officials are blaming Pakistan for its failure in Afghanistan. Think Tanks are churning out new studies and reports suggesting tough conditions for Pakistan for its alleged supports for the terrorist groups. President Trump’s Afghan strategy also suggests more pressure on Pakistan and favors sphere of influence for India in Afghanistan. In totality the United States wants to shift its focus towards Pakistan and Afghanistan is largely becoming a side show. The study argues that in overall context of the ground realities, similarities exist in Afghan and Vietnam Wars that may have long term implications for diplomatic, economic and security matrixes of Pakistan. On the face of emerging US policies for the region and prevailing circumstances the research makes an endeavor to foretell next phase of the Afghan War vis-à-vis its implications on Pakistan. Keywords: US military; Afghanistan; Vietnam; Military Strategy; war zones Introduction Parallels between Vietnam and Afghan war are increasingly being drawn in the academic and scholarly debates, particularly with regards to the growing US military presence in Afghanistan. Voices, even within the President Barack Obama's and now President Trump’s own party is advising that the US is risking being drawn into Afghanistan’s quagmire which analogous to the Nixon’s Vietnam and may become Trump’s Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mayaguez Rescue O
    On Cambodia’s Koh Tang in 1975, US forces fought the last battle of the Southeast Asia War. USAF photo The Mayaguez Rescue By George M. Watson Jr. n May 12, 1975, a Cam- the Air Force helicopter crews were Two Khmer Rouge gunboats are seen bodian gunboat carrying compelled to carry out a mission for during seizure of the US container ship communist Khmer Rouge which they had no formal training. Mayaguez. O soldiers boarded and The ship and its crew were recov- seized Mayaguez, a US container ship ered, but the cost—in lost service lives They were haunted by North Korea’s sailing from Hong Kong to Thailand and damaged equipment—was high. 1968 seizure of USS Pueblo and its and passing along the coast of Cam- A Mayday distress signal from the Navy crew members, who were held bodia. Coming less than two weeks Mayaguez radio operator guided a Navy for 11 months. after the fall of Saigon and the end P-3 patrol aircraft to the vessel the morn- The US had no formal relations of the Vietnam War, Washington had ing after it was seized. The ship was with the new communist dictatorship no choice but to respond, and it did. riding at anchor about 34 miles from the in Phnom Penh, but it retained formi- The answer was a rescue mission. Cambodian harbor town of Kompong dable military forces in Thailand and The effort, afflicted by rushed planning Som, near a spit of land called Tang the Philippines. For one thing, the and poor intelligence, was chaotic.
    [Show full text]
  • An American Perspective on the War of 1812 by Donald Hickey
    An American Perspective on the War of 1812 By Donald Hickey The War of 1812 is probably our most obscure conflict. Although Navy’s practice of removing seamen from American merchant regulars of Great Britain. Similarly, the naval victories on the War of Independence”–they could point to few concrete gains– a great deal has been written about the war, the average American vessels. In contemporary parlance, the war was fought for northern lakes and the high seas and the success of privateers certainly none in the peace treaty–to sustain this claim. is only vaguely aware of why we fought or who the enemy was. “Free Trade and Sailors’ Rights.” These issues seem arcane around the globe demonstrated that, given the right odds, the Even those who know something about the contest are likely to today. Moreover, the only way that the United States to strike nation’s armed ships matched up well against even the vaunted It is this lack of success that may best explain why the war is so remember only a few dramatic moments, such as the writing of at Great Britain was by attacking Canada, and that made it and seemingly invincible Mistress of the Seas. little remembered. Americans have characteristically judged “The Star-Spangled Banner,” the burning of the nation’s capital, look like a war of territorial aggression. Even today Canadians their wars on the basis of their success. The best-known wars– or the Battle of New Orleans. are likely to see the war in this light, and who can blame them? The war also produced its share of heroes–people whose reputations the Revolution, the Civil War, and World War II–were all A war fought to secure maritime rights by invading Canada were enhanced by military or government service.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project L. MICHAEL RIVES Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: July 25, 1995 Copyright 1998 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in New York City - Raised in New Jersey Princeton University U.S. Marines, ,orld ,ar II .ntered the Foreign Service -19 1901 Frankfurt, 2ermany - Refugee Relief 1901-1901 Bonn, 2ermany 1901-1902 Hanoi, 4ietnam - Political Officer 1902-1903 4ice Consul - visa officer and political reporter 4iet Minh - siege environment French military 4ientiane, 6aos 1903-1900 Officer in charge - contacts Royal family The French Communists CIA activity 2uatemala City, 2uatemala - Political officer 1900-1907 6ocal culture and society United Fruit Co. Paris, France 1907-1981 Ambassador:s aide De 2aulle takes over Ambassador Armour:s relations with Dulles and .isenhower McCarthy era 1 State Department - Director for Central African countries 1981-1983 "Soapy" ,illiams and Africa policy U.S. interests Soviet influence Brazzaville, Congo - DCM and Chargé 1983-1988 Bad relations - Soviet and Chinese influence .mbassy closed Bujumbura, Burundi - Chargé 1988-1988 Arab attacks on U.S. .mbassy (Six day warA Hutu and Tutsis Buiet Soviet and Chinese presence State Department - Senior Seminar 1988-1989 Toured U.S. Phnom Penh, Cambodia - Chargé 1989-1971 Sihanouk - U.S. attitude toward U.S. bombings American .agle episode - U.S. arms Coup against Sihanouk U.S. incursion - 1971 4ietnamese activities in Cambodia ixon Doctrine Ballooning embassy 2eneral Haig visit 4ice President Agnew visit 6on Nol Secret Service operations State Department - Chief, African Affairs I R 1971-1972 State Department - 6aos and Cambodian Affairs 1972-197C "Mayaguez incident" Henry Dissinger Djakarta, Indonesia - Deputy Chief of Mission 1970-1978 Human Rights issue Congressional visit Diplomat in Residence, Rollins College 1978-1979 Montreal, Canada - Consul 2eneral 2 Separatist sentiment Retirement and reflection INTERVIEW Q: Today is July 25, 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam War: Saigon Evacuation After Action Report
    Vietnam War: Saigon Evacuation After Action Report Summary of the evacuation of Saigon, South Vietnam under Operation Frequent Wind: Operations Analysis Group, report no. 2-75. (16 May 1975) BACM RESEARCH WWW.PAPERLESSARCHIVES.COM About BACM Research – PaperlessArchives.com BACM Research/PaperlessArchives.com publishes documentary historical research collections. Materials cover Presidencies, Historical Figures, Historical Events, Celebrities, Organized Crime, Politics, Military Operations, Famous Crimes, Intelligence Gathering, Espionage, Civil Rights, World War I, World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, and more. Source material from Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Secret Service, National Security Council, Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Justice, National Archive Records and Administration, and Presidential Libraries. http://www.paperlessarchives.com Vietnam War: Saigon Evacuation After Action Report Summary of the evacuation of Saigon, South Vietnam under Operation Frequent Wind: Operations Analysis Group, report no. 2-75. On 29 April 1975, Operation Frequent Wind was executed, and 1373 American citizens, 5595 Vietnamese and Third Country Nationals were successfully evacuated by helicopter from the American Embassy Saigon and the DAO compound. Status of events, planning, activation, evacuation operations, lessons learned, and after-action reports regarding Operation Frequent Wind are all covered in this document. Also include several National Security Agency helicopter pilot radio transmissions during the Saigon evacuation transcript sheets. This 16 May 1975 report was declassified on 31 December 1985. .,. U"CLAS~I~ltU ' . SBHFfHENT'~l HEADQUARTERS OF . THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF· PACIFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS GROUP FPO SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 96610 OPERATIONS, ANALYSIS. GROUP REPORT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • War of 1812 Brief History by Susan L
    War of 1812 Brief History By Susan L. Conklin, Genesee County Historian In 1811 while Canada supplied reinforcements to the Niagara River area, the United States made no comparable effort to strengthen its undermanned Fort Niagara. However, in 1809 Joseph Ellicott, Resident-Agent for the Holland Land Company, had built a temporary arsenal in Batavia and Daniel D. Tompkins, the Governor of New York State, agreed to supply weapons to improve the defense west of the Genesee River. In 1812 Western New York was composed of five counties; in the south, Allegany, Chautauqua, Cattaraugus and in the north Genesee (which included all of Orleans, Wyoming and the western sections of Livingston and Monroe) and Niagara (which included Erie). On June 18, 1812 the United States Congress declared war on Great Britain. The causes of the war included trade tensions, British support for Indian raids and U.S. territory expansion. The news of this declaration caused great concern and dread among the settlers of Western New York. All able-bodied men were summoned to fight and join the militia, leaving only a few behind to manage the crops. Seneca warriors from the Tonawanda Reservation also volunteered and provided support to the local militia. For a year and a half there had been fighting along the Niagara River and in the later part of 1813 both sides of the river were controlled by the American troops. On December 10, 1813 General George McClure, who had been left in charge of the garrison at Fort George, on the Canadian side, attacked the Canadian Village of Newark (renamed Niagara) which was located one mile north of the fort.
    [Show full text]
  • More Revelations About Mayaguez (And Its Secret Cargo) Jordan J
    Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 4 5-1-1981 More Revelations About Mayaguez (and its Secret Cargo) Jordan J. Paust Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Jordan J. Paust, More Revelations About Mayaguez (and its Secret Cargo), 4 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 61 (1981), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol4/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. More Revelations About Mayaguez (and its Secret Cargo) by Jordan]. Paust· PAUST ON THE MAYAGUEZ: EDITORS' INTRODUCTION·· In May 1975, the u.s. merchant ship Mayaguez was held captive by forces of the Cambodian Government for three days. The incident has produced a lively controversy among international legal scholars. Professor Jordan Paust of the University of Houston has written extensively over the last few years on the issues presented by the Mayaguez incident. In 1976, Professor Paust discussed the legality of governmental actions surrounding the Mayaguez incident. His analysis elicited a critical response from the State Department. The ensuing debate is con­ tinued here. The present article examines the litigation engendered by the incident. Such litigation in­ volves suits brought by crew members of the Mayaguez against the owner of the merchant vessel and against the U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of Sai Gon 30 April 1975
    WALL NOTE TWO: THE FALL OF SAI GON 30 APRIL 1975 DANIEL R. ARANT [email protected] DATE OF INFORMATION: 06 MAY 2008 "We must ensure that any major foreign policy commitment has the full support and understanding of the American people....." GEORGE H. W. BUSH, 41st President of the United States. "The American soldiers who fought in the war did so out of a sense of duty to their country, but their country betrayed them by sending them to an unconscionable war." PHILIP CAPUTO, U.S. Marine infantry platoon leader in Viet Nam and author of A Rumor of War. "... the leaders who planned and executed the war did not understand what they were getting into. The values and ideals we stood for were correct, but it was the wrong war in the wrong place - a place we did not know." RICHARD HOLBROOKE, Foreign Service diplomat in Viet Nam. "Those Americans who went to Vietnam fought for freedom, a truly noble cause. This battle was lost not by those brave Americans and South Vietnamese troops who were waging it but by political misjudgments and strategic failure at the highest levels of government." RONALD REAGAN, 40th President of the United States. "The Vietnam War was a political war that imposed restraints on the military that prevented use of power that we had readily available. ... it was very difficult to tell friend from foe, hence the Calley affair." ADM. THOMAS H. MOORER, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1970-1974). "It was a disastrous, insane, imperial invasion of a weirdo Third World country." TIMOTHY LEARY.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Hampden and Its Aftermath
    Maine History Volume 43 Article 3 Number 1 Here Come the British! 1-1-2007 The aB ttle of aH mpden and Its Aftermath Robert Fraser Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ mainehistoryjournal Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fraser, Robert. “The aB ttle of aH mpden and Its Aftermath” Maine History 43, no. 1 (January 2007): 21-40. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BATTLE OF HAMPDEN AND ITS AFTERMATH BY ROBERT FRASER The successful British attack on the Penobscot Valley in fall 1814 was to annex eastern Maine to Canada, a move taken to protect the important line of communications between Halifax and Quebec. New England merchants had opposed the War of 1812, as it destroyed their interna- tional trade, and most New Englanders tried to remain neutral during the fray. At Hampden, enemy threats brought them out to defend their homes. Although Great Britain returned the area to the United States at war’s end, the occupation of the Penobscot Valley had lasting implica- tions for the District of Maine. Between 1954 and 1984 Robert Fraser was assistant curator at the Cohasset Historical Society and a consultant to other historical societies. He writes historical articles for local newspa- pers and national magazines, and has published two books on light- houses and another on local history.
    [Show full text]
  • American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics
    American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics Updated July 29, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32492 American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics Summary This report provides U.S. war casualty statistics. It includes data tables containing the number of casualties among American military personnel who served in principal wars and combat operations from 1775 to the present. It also includes data on those wounded in action and information such as race and ethnicity, gender, branch of service, and cause of death. The tables are compiled from various Department of Defense (DOD) sources. Wars covered include the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Civil War, the Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam Conflict, and the Persian Gulf War. Military operations covered include the Iranian Hostage Rescue Mission; Lebanon Peacekeeping; Urgent Fury in Grenada; Just Cause in Panama; Desert Shield and Desert Storm; Restore Hope in Somalia; Uphold Democracy in Haiti; Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF); Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF); Operation New Dawn (OND); Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR); and Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS). Starting with the Korean War and the more recent conflicts, this report includes additional detailed information on types of casualties and, when available, demographics. It also cites a number of resources for further information, including sources of historical statistics on active duty military deaths, published lists of military personnel killed in combat actions, data on demographic indicators among U.S. military personnel, related websites, and relevant CRS reports. Congressional Research Service American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Awards Dinner to Honor Reporting in a Year of Crisis
    THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER OF THE OVERSEAS PRESS CLUB OF AMERICA, NEW YORK, NY • March-April 2016 Awards Dinner to Honor Reporting in a Year of Crisis EVENT PREVIEW: April 28 By Chad Bouchard Europe’s refugee crisis and deadly terrorist attacks are in focus in this year’s Dateline magazine, which will be shared at the OPC’s Annual Awards Dinner on April 28. The issue – and the gala event – honors the work of international journalists covering up- Christopher Michel Jonas Fredwall Karlsson Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images heaval in the face of growing threats, Left to right: Kai Ryssdal of Marketplace, David Fanning of PBS FRONTLINE which OPC President Marcus Mabry and Jason Rezaian of The Washington Post. said makes the work of correspon- President’s Award. In a message to press freedom candle in memory of dents harder and ever more essential. Fanning offering the award, Mabry journalists who have died in the line Kai Ryssdal, host and senior edi- praised FRONTLINE and Fanning’s of duty in the past year and in honor of tor of American Public Media’s Mar- “extraordinary, defining” work since those injured, missing and abducted. ketplace, will be our presenter. Rys- the show’s first season in 1983. Fan- The dinner will be held at the Man- sdal joined Marketplace in 2005, and ning retired as executive producer last darin Oriental Hotel on Columbus has hosted the show from China, the year after 33 seasons, and still serves Circle, and begins with a reception at Middle East and across the United States. This year’s 22 award winners at the series’ executive producer at 6:00 p.m., sponsored by multinational were selected from more than 480 large.
    [Show full text]