DOCSLIB.ORG

Serhii Plokhy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Serhii Plokhy The 1996 J.B. Rudnyckyj Distinguished Lecture University of Manitoba Presented by Serhii Plokhy Associate Director Peter Jacyk Centre for Ukrainian Historical Research Deputy Editor Hrushevsky Translation Project Dr. Serhii Plokhy is an Associate Director of the Peter Jacyk Centre for Ukrainian Historical Research at the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta. He serves as Deputy Editor of the Hrushevsky Translation Project, and has co-edited, Mykhailo Hrushevsky, History of Ukraine-Rus'. Vol. 7: The Cossack Age to 1625. (Edmonton and Toronto, 1999). His latest book, A Rebel Faith: The Cossacks and Religion in Early Modern Ukraine has been accepted for publication by the Oxford University Press, and will appear in print next year. He also authored a number of articles on the role of history and religion in the shaping of the Russian and Ukrainian identities. THE CRIMEAN DISPUTE: HISTORY IN RUSSIAN- UKRAINIAN TERRITORIAL CLAIMS Introduction The dissolution of the USSR -- the last world empire - brought to the fore the whole range of problems that usually accompany the dissolution of empires. The disintegration of the Ottoman, Habsburg, and, to some extent, French empires took place in the midst of war. Despite the fact that Britain and later Portugal withdrew from their colonial territories almost peacefully, the national, tribal and religious conflicts that commenced after the departure of colonial administrations eventually resulted in bloody conflicts and wars. Among the many problems that have followed from the dissolution of the USSR is the border question. Although the border disputes in the former USSR have not been as sharp as they are in the former Yugoslavia, they do constitute a serious threat to peaceful relations between the former Soviet republics. It was hardly accidental that the first major manifestation of the national unrest in the USSR came with the events in Nagorno-Karabakh, a region claimed by two former Soviet republics: those of Armenia and Azerbaidzhan. The transformation of administrative borders into state ones is proving to be a very complicated and uneasy process.[1] With the disintegration of the USSR, the border question has raised to the level of special importance the relations between two other republics of the former Soviet Union-Russia and Ukraine. The problem came to light in late August of 1991, after the proclamation of Ukrainian independence. On August 29 the spokesman for the Russian President, Pavel Voshchanov, announced that if Ukraine seceded from the USSR, Russia would reserve the right to revise its borders with Ukraine.[2] In fact, the new Russian authorities claimed Russia's right to the eastern and southern oblasts of Ukraine, areas, which underwent a high degree of Russification during the Communist regime, and to the Crimean peninsula, a region transferred from Russia to Ukraine in 1954. Since the results of the Ukrainian referendum (held in December of 1991) demonstrated an overwhelming support for the idea of Ukrainian independence (more than 90% of the voters that took part in the referendum voted for independence) the nationalistic factions in the Russian leadership were forced to abandon previous Russian claims to the eastern Ukrainian oblasts and concentrate specifically on the issue of Crimea, the only region in Ukraine where ethnic Russians constitute the majority of the population and where the vote for independence was the lowest one in Ukraine. The results of the referendum in Crimea also showed that the support for independence in Sevastopol was slightly higher than in other areas of Crimea (in Crimea it was 54%, in Sevastopol - 57% in favour). There was also other indication that voters in Sevastopol were more "pro-independent" than in the other areas of Crimea. In the vote for the president of Ukraine that was conducted simultaneously with the referendum, Viacheslav Chornovil, the head of the Lviv regional administration in Galicia - the stronghold of Ukrainian nationalism, received in Sevastopol more votes (10,93%) than the representative of the highly Russified city of Kharkiv, ethnic Russian Vladimir Grinev (8.38%). The vote in Sevastopol signalled serious threat to the Russian interests in the area and from the first days of 1992 Sevastopol and Black Sea Fleet appeared in the centre of the massive propagandistic campaign, launched by the Russian parliament. As the "all-Union resort" and home of the Black Sea fleet, Crimea has been viewed by many Russian politicians as an "ancient Russian territory." Leaders of the parliamentary nationalistic factions have been using every single opportunity to claim that the transition of Crimea to Ukraine in 1954 was conducted allegedly in violation of the Russian constitution and that there are more than enough legal arguments in place to demand the transfer of Crimea back to Russia.[3] In April of 1992, when the confrontation over Crimea had reached its peak, Russian Vice-President Aleksandr Rutskoi on his visit to Crimea made a direct claim to that territory, justifying this claim on the basis of historical arguments. Rutskoi rejected one part of Crimean history - the transfer of the peninsula to Ukraine in 1954, and emphasized another - the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Empire and its military presence there: "If one turns to history, then again history is not on the side of those who are trying to appropriate this land. If in 1954, perhaps under the influence of a hangover or maybe of sunstroke, the appropriate documents were signed according to which the Crimea was transferred to the jurisdiction of Ukraine, I am sorry, such a document does not cancel out the history of Crimea."[4] Since 1992 the issue of Crimea, Sevastopol and the Black Sea Fleet has constantly remained in the center of Russian-Ukrainian relations. The Black Sea issue has been raised again and again each time the political struggle in Kremlin has intensified. From Aleksandr Rutskoi to Aleksandr Lebed, every consecutive "strong man" in Kremlin would raise the issue, and appeal in that way to the nationalistically orientated Russian electorate. As the power struggle in the Kremlin intensified with Yeltsin's heart attack in June, 1996, the issue of Sevastopol and the Black Sea Fleet were again resurrected by the presidential hopefuls Moscow mayor Iurii Luzhkov, and then Security Council secretary Aleksandr Lebed. Much further than Luzhkov or Lebed went in their claims to Sevastopol members of the Russian parliament, Georgii Tikhonov, the Chairman of the Duma Committee on CIS Affairs, publicly stated that Sevastopol "was, is and will be Russian." Tikhonov and his Committee submitted to the Duma resolution that stopped the partition of the Fleet, and declared Sevastopol to be an exclusive base of the Russian Black Sea Fleet.[5] Though the current crisis over the Black Sea Fleet and status of Sevastopol has a number of elements that distinguish it from the previous "Sevastopol crises," there is a lot in common between the new and old Russian-Ukrainian debates on the issue of Crimea. What is in common in all of them is the type of historical argumentation that is used by the Russian side to make its claim to Se vastopol. The cornerstone of all Russian claims to the Crimea and Sevastopol is a myth of Sevastopol as an exclusively Russian city, the "city of Russian glory," the symbol of Russian fleet and Russian glorious past in general. This paper takes as point of the departure John A. Armstrong's definition of the myth as the integrating phenomenon through which symbols of national identity acquire a coherent meaning.[6] Thus, the main goal of this paper is not to define whether the Sevastopol myth is "true" or "false," but to determine how the myth was created and how it has been transformed in order to meet the challenges of the changing political circumstances. For the nationalistically orientated Russian politicians, the history of the Russian presence in the Crimea is closely connected to the history of the fleet, and henceforth, to the history of its main base in the Crimea - Sevastopol. The former commander of the fleet, Admiral Igor Kasatonov (was recalled from Sevastopol to Moscow in December 1992) stressed in an interview with the Russian newspaper Literaturnaia Rossiia, that Russia in any form cannot be imagined without its glorious Black See fleet. According to Kasatonov, the Ukrainian takeover of the Black Sea fleet and its naval bases in Crimea and Black Sea region would throw Russia back three centuries, to the times before the rule of Peter I. Kasatonov was really proud to say in his interview that during his tenure as a commander of the fleet, the tombs of Admirals Lazarev, Nakhimov, Kornilov, and Istomin were restored in St. Volodymyr (Vladimir) Cathedral in Sevastopol.[7] In the autumn of 1996 when the status of Sevastopol once again was under discussion in the Russian parliament, the Russian newspapers published the appeal of A. P. Nakhimov, G. V. Kornilova, and A. P. Istomin, allegedly offsprings of the Sevastopol heroes, to the President, government and parliament of Russia. The appeal called on the authorities to put effectively Sevastopol under the Russian control.[8] The names of Nakhimov, Kornilov, and Istomin, the commanders of the fleet and defenders of Sevastopol during the Crimean war of 1853-56 may symbolize better than anything else, the sense of Sevastopol myth, as it exists in contemporary Russia. Sevastopol Mythology: Imperial Period The Sevastopol myth as many other myths, based on the war events, aroused from the humiliation of defeat. War victories give pride to nations, glory to generals, but very rarely serve as a basis for the myths that can mobilize and bring a nation together. From the times of Ancient Greece and the veneration of 300 Spartans, stories about the heroism of those, being defeated, serve as an important component of nation's heroic mythology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Babadzhanian, Hamazasp
    Babadzhanian, Hamazasp Born: February 18th, 1906 Died: November 1st, 1977 (Aged 71) Ethnicity: Armenian Field of Activity: Red Army Brief Biography Hamazasp Khachaturi Babadzhanian was a Russian military general who served during multiple wars for the Soviet Union, rising to prominence during the Great Patriotic War. He was born in 1906 into an impecunious Armenian family in Chardakhlu, Azerbaijan. He attended a secondary school in Tiflis in 1915 but due to familial financial difficulties was forced to return home and toil in the fields on his family’s plot of land, later working as a highway worker during 1923-24. Babadzhanian joined the Red Army in 1925 and later attended a Military School in Yerevan in 1926, graduating as an officer in 1929, as well as joining the Soviet Communist Party in 1928. He received various postings, mopping up armed gangs in the Caucasus region in 1930 and aided in liquidating the Kulak revolt. Babadzhanian moved around frequently, generally within the Transcaucasus and Baku regions, until 1939-1940, when he served in the Finno-Soviet war. He played a pivotal role in numerous battles in World War 2, participating in the battle of Smolensk, as well as contributing a fundamentally in Yelnya, where he overcame a far superior German force. For his efforts in recapturing Stanslav he received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. He provided support in Poland, as well fighting in Berlin, contributing to the capture of the Reichstag. After the Great Patriotic War Babadzhanian would prove crucial in quelling the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, and some time after in 1975 became Chief Marshal of the Tank and Armoured Troops, a rank only he and one other attained.
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For
    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTIO N AUTHORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky Tönu Parming CONTRACTOR : University of Delawar e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky, Project Director an d Co-Principal Investigato r Tönu Parming, Co-Principal Investigato r COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 621- 9 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or in part fro m funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPLY FOR COPYRIGH T This work has been requested for manuscrip t review for publication . It is not to be quote d without express written permission by the authors , who hereby reserve all the rights herein . Th e contractual exception to this is as follows : The [US] Government will have th e right to publish or release Fina l Reports, but only in same forma t in which such Final Reports ar e delivered to it by the Council . Th e Government will not have the righ t to authorize others to publish suc h Final Reports without the consent o f the authors, and the individua l researchers will have the right t o apply for and obtain copyright o n any work products which may b e derived from work funded by th e Council under this Contract . ii EXEC 1 Overall Executive Summary HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTION by Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delawar e d Tönu Parming, University of Marylan August 1, 1975, after more than two years of intensive negotiations, 35 Head s of Governments--President Ford of the United States, Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada , Secretary-General Brezhnev of the USSR, and the Chief Executives of 32 othe r European States--signed the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperatio n in Europe (CSCE) .
    [Show full text]
  • Vodka and Pickled Cabbage: Eastern European Travels of a Professional Economist*
    CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC REFORM AND TRANSFORMATION School of Management and Languages, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS Tel: 0131 451 4202 Fax: 0131 451 3498 email: [email protected] World-Wide Web: http://www.sml.hw.ac.uk/cert (ebook) Vodka and Pickled Cabbage: Eastern European Travels of a Professional Economist* Paul G. Hare‡ September 2008 Discussion Paper 2008/08 Abstract One of the most amazing ‘events’ of the last 15 plus years has been the complete transformation of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, their transition from communist rule and central planning to various forms of market-type economy. Ten of the countries have now joined the EU as full members, and for them this accession marks the real end of the Cold War, the end of the postwar divide between East and West. As a professional economist - initially as a PhD student, eventually as an economics professor based in Scotland - I have worked on the region since the late 1960s, travelling to diverse places in many countries, getting to know the people, observing the economic system both under central planning and as it was transformed to a market system. Finally, in 2006, I decided to write a book about my experiences in the region. The result is not a technical academic work of the sort I normally write. It is a mix of economic history; short accounts of what I do or have done as a professional economist working in an endlessly fascinating part of the world; and travel tale, since my work has taken me to some quite obscure and not at all well known places.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1990
    ublished by the Ukrainian National Association inc.. a fraternal non-profit association rainian Weekly vol. LVIII No. 51 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, DECEMBER 23,1990 50 cents U.S., USSR sign Faithful in U.S. celebrate Patriarch Mstyslav's return agreement on by Marta Kolomayets SOUTH BOUND BROOK, N.J. - consulates "A new joy has emerged" ("Nova radist stala"), proclaimed Patriarch Mstyslav WASHINGTON - The united І of Kiev and all Ukraine during his first States and the Soviet Union have an– patriarchal liturgy at St. Andrew's nounced an agreement to open a U.S. Memorial Church since his enthrone– consulate general in Kiev and a Soviet ment as prelate of the Ukrainian consulate general in New York, culmi– Autocephalous Orthodox Church in nating years of contacts about the issue. Kiev on Sunday, November 18. The two sides reached agreement Addressing hundreds of faithful who December 10, when Secretary of State filled this seat of Ukrainian Orthodoxy James Baker and Soviet Foreign Mi– on Sunday, December 16, Patriarch nister Eduard Shevardnadze met Mstyslav described his moving six– week in Houston. State Department pilgrimage to Ukraine, a triumphant Spokesman Margaret Tutwiler issued a return to his native land after an written joint statement on December 13 absence of 46 years. announcing the decision. There, thousands of believers, de– Consuls general and staff have al– nied freedom of worship for decades, ready been appointed, but they were not had greeted the 92-year-old primate named in the announcement. Both with the traditional welcome of bread missions are to begin operations in and salt.
    [Show full text]
  • Van Arty Association and RUSI Van Members News Aug 4, 2020
    Van Arty Association and RUSI Van Members News Aug 4, 2020 Newsletters normally are emailed on Monday evenings. If you don’t get a future newsletter on time, check the websites below to see if there is a notice about the current newsletter or to see if the current edition is posted there. If the newsletter is posted, please contact me at [email protected] to let me know you didn’t get your copy. Newsletter on line. This newsletter and previous editions are available on the Vancouver Artillery Association website at: www.vancouvergunners.ca and the RUSI Vancouver website at: http://www.rusivancouver.ca/newsletter.html . Both groups are also on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=vancouver%20artillery%20association and https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=rusi%20vancouver Wednesday Lunches - Lunches suspended until further notice. Everyone stay safe!! Upcoming events – Mark your calendars (see Poster section at end) Aug 05 ‘Wednesday Lunch’ Zoom meeting Aug 12 ‘Wednesday Lunch’ Zoom meeting Aug 19 ‘Wednesday Lunch’ Zoom meeting RUSI(NS) - Distinguished Speaker on Zoom - 0900hrs PDT World War 2 – 1945 John Thompson Strategic analyst - quotes from his book “Spirit Over Steel” Aug 1945: Japan Yields … “the war situation has developed not necessarily to Japan's advantage". -Emperor Hirohito in his speech ordering Japan to lay down its arms. General: The US strategic bombing offensive against Japan works over a number of cities, usually using smaller raids to saturate factory sites. The effects of the US bombing campaign this month are eclipsed by the atomic bombings, but the B-29 force in the Pacific has been extraordinarily destructive.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine in World War II
    Ukraine in World War II. — Kyiv, Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance, 2015. — 28 p., ill. Ukrainians in the World War II. Facts, figures, persons. A complex pattern of world confrontation in our land and Ukrainians on the all fronts of the global conflict. Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance Address: 16, Lypska str., Kyiv, 01021, Ukraine. Phone: +38 (044) 253-15-63 Fax: +38 (044) 254-05-85 Е-mail: [email protected] www.memory.gov.ua Printed by ПП «Друк щоденно» 251 Zelena str. Lviv Order N30-04-2015/2в 30.04.2015 © UINR, texts and design, 2015. UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF NATIONAL REMEMBRANCE www.memory.gov.ua UKRAINE IN WORLD WAR II Reference book The 70th anniversary of victory over Nazism in World War II Kyiv, 2015 Victims and heroes VICTIMS AND HEROES Ukrainians – the Heroes of Second World War During the Second World War, Ukraine lost more people than the combined losses Ivan Kozhedub Peter Dmytruk Nicholas Oresko of Great Britain, Canada, Poland, the USA and France. The total Ukrainian losses during the war is an estimated 8-10 million lives. The number of Ukrainian victims Soviet fighter pilot. The most Canadian military pilot. Master Sergeant U.S. Army. effective Allied ace. Had 64 air He was shot down and For a daring attack on the can be compared to the modern population of Austria. victories. Awarded the Hero joined the French enemy’s fortified position of the Soviet Union three Resistance. Saved civilians in Germany, he was awarded times. from German repression. the highest American The Ukrainians in the Transcarpathia were the first during the interwar period, who Awarded the Cross of War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jews in the War
    ., THE JEWS IN THE WAR I S RAE L C 0 HEN FREDERICK MULLER LTD. LONDON ·"*:_\,.-•• .. THE JEWS .IN THE WAR ,· • .By the same Author : JEWISH LIFE IN MODERN TIMES THE JOURNAL OF A Jt:WISH TRAVELLER THE RUHLEBEN PRISON CAMP A GHETTO GALLERY THE PROGRESS OF ZIONISM BRITAIN'S NAMELESS ALLY ' • • THE JEWS IN THE WAR By_ ISRAEL COHEN · • • • • I . • . LONDON FREDERICK MULLER LIMITED 29 Great James Street W.C.I FIRST PUBLISHED BY FREDERICK MULLER LTD. I N I942 PRINTED IN GREAT BRI,TAIN BY • THE CAMELOT PRESS LTD • LONDON AND SOUTHAMPTON ·- • • . CONTENTS CHAP. PAGE PREFACE 7 I. THE JEWISH ISSUE 9 II. HITLER'S FIRST WAR III. THE DESTRUCTION OF EUROPEAN JEWRY IV. THE JEWISH CONTRIBUTION 57 APPENDIX (a) Decorations awarded to B'ritish Jews in the Navy, - Army, _and Air Force - 78 · (b) Honours awarded to British Jews in Civil Defence 8o 5 PREFACE ~ HIS is the first attempt to give an account of what the Jews T are suffering and of what they are doing in the war. It is necessarily incomp!ete, partly because it is intended to be only a sketch of Jewish aspects of the titanic struggle, and partly because fuller information is in many cases still unobtainable. But, such as it is, this account should serve to enlighten public opinion, which unfortunately knows very little of the martyrdom the Jews are enduring under the barbarous Nazi regime on the Continent, and still less of the contributions-military, economic, and technical-that theJ ews of the Allied Democracies are making to the overthrow of Hitlerism.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconceptualizing the Alien: Jews in Modern Ukrainian Thought*
    Ab Imperio, 4/2003 Yohanan PETROVSKY-SHTERN RECONCEPTUALIZING THE ALIEN: JEWS IN MODERN UKRAINIAN THOUGHT* To love ones motherland is no crime. From Zalyvakhas letter to Svitlychnyi, Chornovil, and Lukho. Whoever in hunger eats the grass of the motherland is no criminal. Andrei Platonov, The Sand Teacher Perhaps one of the most astounding phenomena in modern Ukrainian thought is the radical reassessment of the Jew. Though the revision of Jew- ish issues began earlier in the 20th century, if not in the late 19th, it became particularly salient as part of the new political narrative after the “velvet revolution” of 1991 that led to the demise of the USSR and the establish- * I gratefully acknowledge the help of two anonymous reviewers of Ab Imperio whose insightful comments helped me considerably to improve this paper. Ukrainian names in the body text are rendered in their Library of Congress Ukrainian transliteration. In cases where there is an established English (or Russian) form for a name, it is bracketed following the Ukrainian version. The spelling in the footnotes does not follow LC Ukrainian transliteration except in cases where the publishers provide their own spelling. 519 Y. Petrovsky-Shtern, Reconceptualizing the Alien... ment of an independent Ukraine. The new Ukrainian perception of the Jew boldly challenged the received bias and created a new social and political environment fostering the renaissance of Jewish culture in Ukraine, let alone Ukrainian-Jewish dialogue. There were a number of ways to explain what had happened. For some, the sudden Ukrainian-Jewish rapprochement was a by-product of the new western-oriented post-1991 Ukrainian foreign pol- icy.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Nationalist Parties and Movements in Contemporary Ukraine Before and After Independence: the Right and Its Politics, 1989-1994
    Nationalities Papers, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1997 RADICAL NATIONALIST PARTIES AND MOVEMENTS IN CONTEMPORARY UKRAINE BEFORE AND AFTER INDEPENDENCE: THE RIGHT AND ITS POLITICS, 1989-1994 Taras Kuzio Introduction The radical right in the Ukrainian political spectrum is dominated by three move- ments—the Nationalist Union Ukrainian State Independence (DSU), the Ukrainian National Assembly (UNA, formerly the Ukrainian Inter-Party Assembly, UMPA) and the Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists (KUN). The UNA is dominated by the highly secretive Ukrainian Nationalist Union (UNS) which grew out of the national- ist wing of the Association of Independent Ukrainian Youth (SNUM). The KUN was launched in 1992 in Ukraine as the overt arm of the emigre Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists-Bandera faction (known commonly as OUN revolutionaries, or OUNr). Other organisations, such as SNUM and the more radical eastern Ukrainian-based Association of Ukrainian Youth (SUM), increasingly adopted "revolutionary nationalism" as their ideology in 1990-1991, with nationalists propagating a "youth cult" to attract the younger generation (both for members and intellectual support).1 It is also often pointed out that Ukrainian nationalism will have a large appeal among the youth of tomorrow.2 Other nationalist groups, though smaller, have also emerged, such as the Ukrainian National-Radical Party (UNRP) and the Organisation for the Liberation of Ukraine,3 but they have remained largely insignificant. The UNRP was established at the end of 1990 in L'viv, joined the Ukrainian Inter-Party Assembly (UMPA) but remained underground. Its leader, Mykhailo Stasiuk, launched the nationalist and widely read journal Derzhavnist in 1991, claiming the highly inflated membership figure of 500 members.4 The Ukrainian National Party (UNP) and the Ukrainian People's Democratic Party (UNDP), the founders of the UMPA, amalga- mated into the Ukrainian National Conservative Party (UNKP) in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Abn Correspondence Bulletin of the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations
    FREEDOM FOR NATIONS ! CORRESPONDENCE FREEDOM FOR INDIVIDUALS! JANUARY-FEBRUARY 1989 CONTENTS: Carolling Ukrainian-Style ....................... 2 The Autobiography of Levko Lukyanenko ..................... 3 European Freedom Council Meeting ..............................16 Statement of the European Freedom Council .............. 16 Hon. John Wilkinson, M.P. Eastern European Policy for Western Europe .............. 19 Genevieve Aubry, M.P. Is Switzerland Ready for a New Challenge with the European Nations .......................... 26 Sir Frederic Bennett Can the Soviet Russian Empire Survive? ....................... 31 Bertil Haggman Aiding the Forces of Freedom in the Soviet Empire ................................... 34 Ukrainian Christian Democratic Front Holds Inaugural Meeting ........... 40 David Remnick Ukraine Could be Soviets’ Next Trouble Spot ..............41 Bohdan Nahaylo Specter of the Empire Haunts the Soviet Union ..........45 Appeal to the Russian Intelligentsia ......... ......................47 Freedom for Nations! Freedom for Individuals! ABN CORRESPONDENCE BULLETIN OF THE ANTI-BOLSHEVIK BLOC OF NATIONS Publisher and Owner (Verleger und Inha­ It is not our practice to pay for contribut­ ber): American Friends of the Anti-Bolshevik ed materials. Reproduction permitted only Bloc of Nations (AF ABN), 136 Second Avenue, with indication of source (ABN Corr.). New York, N.Y. 10003, USA. Annual subscription: 27 Dollars in the Zweigstelle Deutschland: A. Dankiw, USA, and the equivalent of 27 US Dollars in Zeppelinstr. 67, 8000 München 80. all other countries. Remittances to Deutsche Editorial Staff: Board of Editors Bank, Munich, Neuhauser Str. 6, Account Editor-in-Chief: Mrs. Slava Stetsko, M.A. No. 3021003, Anna Dankiw. Zeppelinstr. 67 Schriftleitung: Redaktionskollegium. 8000 München 80 Verantw. Redakteur Frau Slava Stetzko. West Germany Zeppelinstraße 67 Articles signed with name or pseudonym 8000 München 80 do not necessarily reflect the Editor’s opinion, Telefon: 48 25 32 but that of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics
    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : The Helsinki Watch Committees i n the Soviet Republics : Implica - tions for Soviet Nationalit y Policy AUTHOR : Yaroslav Bilinsky T8nu Parmin g CONTRACTOR : University of Delawar e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Yaroslav Bilinsk y COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 621- 9 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or in part from funds provided by the National Council for Sovie t and East European Research . Yaroslav Bilinsky (University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711, USA ) Tönu Parmin g (University of Maryland, College Park, ND 20742, USA ) HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR SOVIETY NATIONALITY POLICY * Paper presented at Second World Congres s on Soviet and East European Studies , Garmisch-Partenkirchen, German Federal Republic , September 30 - October 4, 198 0 *This paper is based on the authors' longer study, The Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics : Implications for the Sovie t Nationality Question, which was supported in whole or in part fro m funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East Europea n Research, under Council Contract Number 621-9 . Travel to Garmisch- Partenkirchen has been--in Bilinsky's case—made possible by grant s from the American Council of Learned Societies and the University o f Delaware . The authors would like to thank their benefactors an d explicitly stress that the authors alone are responsible for th e contents of this paper . 2 Unexpectedly, within two years of the signing by the Sovie t Union, the United States, Canada, and thirty-two European states , of the long and solemn Final Act of the Conference on Security an d Cooperation in Europe in Helsinki, August l, 1975, there sprang u p as many as five groups of Soviet dissenters claiming that th e Helsinki Final Act justified their existence and activity .
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT SOVIET JEWISH SOLDIERS SAW and HOW IT IS REMEMBERED an NCEEER Working Paper by Zvi Gitelman University of Michigan
    WHY THEY FOUGHT: WHAT SOVIET JEWISH SOLDIERS SAW AND HOW IT IS REMEMBERED An NCEEER Working Paper by Zvi Gitelman University of Michigan National Council for Eurasian and East European Research University of Washington Box 353650 Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] http://www.nceeer.org/ TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Zvi Gitelman NCEEER Contract Number: 824-03g Date: September 21, 2011 Copyright Information Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicate and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract or Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER’s own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows: (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United States Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
    [Show full text]