ASN, Vol. 8, No 2, Pages 28–43, 2021 28 Corresponding Author: P
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha
“CONSERVATION OF THE WINTERING POPULATION OF THE GLOBALLY THREATENED RED-BREASTED GOOSE (BRANTA RUFICOLLIS) IN BULGARIA” LIFE 09/NAT/BG/000230 Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha Anne Harrison Anne Harrison & Geoff Hilton Geoff Hilton Wildfowl & Wetlands & Wetlands Trust Trust 1 Goose Sensitivity Mapping for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha Contents 1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Requirement for wind energy............................................................................................. 4 1.2. Conservation legislation ..................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Potential effects of wind energy on geese .......................................................................... 5 1.4. Why geese, why Dobrudzha? ............................................................................................. 6 1.5. Sensitivity mapping as a planning tool ................................................................................ 7 2. Aim and purpose of this tool ...................................................................................................... 7 3. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.1. General -
Birdwatching Tour
PIRT “Via Pontica” Birdwatching Tour PROMOTING INNOVATIVE RURAL TOURISM IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN REGION 2014 Table of Contents Birdwatching Sites .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Armenia ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Turkey ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Technical Requirements, Issues and Solutions ............................................................................................................................................................ 70 Detailed Itinerary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ -
Bulgaria: Winter Birding Wonderland
BULGARIA: WINTER BIRDING WONDERLAND 4 - 11 FEBRUARY 2020 Red-breasted Goose is the chief target on this trip. www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | ITINERARY Bulgaria: Winter Birding Wonderland 2020 This tour encompasses the best of Bulgaria, and indeed eastern European birding, during the winter months. While winter birding lacks the sheer diversity of the spring tour, it brings with it the vast numbers of geese and other waterfowl that make use of this small area in Eastern Europe to overwinter. High among these are large numbers of Red-breasted Geese, a globally threatened bird, along with the likes of Smew, White-headed Duck, and both Tundra and Whooper Swans. Aside from the truly impressive numbers of waterfowl, the key specials of Bulgaria and indeed, most of Europe are still on the cards and should still be seen. These are Grey-headed, Black, Syrian, and Middle-spotted Woodpeckers, Short-toed Treecreeper, Dalmatian Pelican, Pygmy Cormorant, Rough-legged and Long-legged Buzzards, Calandra Lark, Sombre Tit, Ring Ouzel, Spotted Nutcracker, and White-tailed Eagle. Other key advantages of this tour are: - Short traveling and a high diversity and numbers of birds. - All of the important observation points (lakes) are relatively small and easily accessible in winter conditions. - The highest concentration of waterbirds - around Lake Burgas (up to 230 000 Geese) and Durankulak Lake (up to 250 000 Geese), compared to their area. - The brackish and freshwater lakes situated near the Black Sea Coast attract a high diversity of birds – up to 150 species for the tour. Itinerary (8 days/7 nights) Day 1. -
Official Journal L129
Official Journal L 129 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 17 May 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/791 of 16 May 2019 amending for the 302nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations ..................................................................................................... 1 DECISIONS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/792 of 13 May 2019 entrusting to the European Commission — the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) — the exercise of certain powers conferred on the appointing authority and the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment ............................................................... 3 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/793 of 16 May 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2019) 3797) (1) ............... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ★ Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/794 of 15 May 2019 on a coordinated control plan with a view to establishing the prevalence of certain substances migrating from materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (notified under document C(2019) 3519) (1) .......... 37 (1) Text with EEA relevance. (Continued overleaf) -
Network Program Democracy
Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria Final Report Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria 1998-2002 FINAL REPORT TO THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Cooperative Agreement No. 181-A-00-98-00320-00 Institute for Sustainable Communities 535 Stone Cutters Way, Montpelier, VT 05602 USA Phone 802-229-2900 | Fax 802-229-2919 [email protected] | www.iscvt.org April 2003 Photos, front and back inside covers: Bulgarian landscapes; next page: DemNet-supported activities of SO partners and NGOs working for positive change in Bulgaria. Table of Contents I. Executive Summary • 6 II. The Context • 8 III. Program Design & Goals • 9 IV. Strengthening the Capacity of SO Partners • 11 • SELECTING SUPPORT ORGANIZATION PARTNERS • ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING • DEEPENING PROGRAM IMPACT • KEY OUTCOMES IN DEMNET’S FUNCTIONAL AREAS V. SO Partner Performance Stories • 22 VI. Supporting a Vibrant NGO Sector & Strengthening Civil Society in Bulgaria • 24 • TARGETING UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS & IMPROVING SOCIAL SAFETY NETS • CREATING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY • NETWORKING & COALITION BUILDING FOR SUPPORT & SUSTAINABILITY • STRENGTHENING OUTREACH & PUBLIC RELATIONS • INCREASING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN POLICY DIALOGUE VII. Lessons Learned • 27 VIII. Conclusion • 29 IX. Attachments A: DEMNET SO PARTNER PUBLICATION B: SO PARTNER SUMMARIES C: ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING & PERFORMANCE MONITORING COMPONENTS D: SERVICE QUALITY REVIEW REPORT E: DONOR SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY F: ENGAGE INITIATIVE REPORT G: TRAVEL NOTES PUBLICATION (ENGAGE INITIATIVE) H: VOICES FOR CHANGE PUBLICATION I: ADVOCACY INITIATIVE REPORT J: LEADING LIGHTS PUBLICATION K: SUMMARY OF NGO GRANTEES L: SENSE OF EMPOWERMENT VIDEO Acknowledgements The success of any project is in the hands of many people—the SO partners, the capable and dedicated ISC staff in Bulgaria, many excellent consultants who supported the program, and the Bulgaria USAID mission that provided sound support and counsel at critical junctures. -
Official Journal L140
Official Journal L 140 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 28 May 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/855 of 27 May 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran ............................................ 1 ★ Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/856 of 26 February 2019 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the operation of the Innovation Fund (1) .................................................................................. 6 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/857 of 27 May 2019 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 as a feed additive for dairy sheep and dairy goats and repealing Regulation (EC) No 226/2007 (holder of authorisation Danstar Ferment AG represented by Lallemand SAS) (1) ................................................................... 18 DECISIONS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/858 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Meeting of the Parties of the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA), and repealing the Decision of 12 June 2017 establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the Meeting of the Parties of the SIOFA ...................... 21 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/859 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the South Pacific Regional -
Double Dutch
Double Dutch? Transferring the integrated area approach to Bulgaria Paper for the 2008 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Berlin, 22-23 February 2008. Carel Dieperink (Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, P.O. Box80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands, [email protected] ) Linda van Duivenbode (POVVIK-Mec B.V., Ondiep-zuidzijde, 3551 BW Utrecht, the Netherlands) René Boesten (POVVIK-Mec B.V., Ondiep-zuidzijde, 3551 BW Utrecht, the Netherlands) Abstract National and regional development plans and private sector investment plans guide the development of the Bulgarian coastal zone. Still, the development is focussed on short- term returns and profits. Pressure from the great number of investors combined with competition between municipalities to attract investments, limited national funds to support the needed development of infrastructure and utilities and the weak legal basis for enforcing the top down implementation of the plans contribute further to this short term thinking. Long-term thinking integrating several societal interests is required in order to meet the sustainability challenges. The Dutch integrated area approach is an attempt to integrate several societal interests. So far it has been quite successful. At the request of the Bulgarian government the approach is transferred to Bulgaria in order to develop a vision and a strategy for integrated coastal zone management for the Black Sea coast. The Bulgarian request is also a consequence of the EU Recommendation on Integrated Coastal Zone Management, which urges EU member states to develop a strategic action plan for their coastal areas. With financial support of the Dutch government a Dutch-Bulgarian team is trying to transfer the approach to Bulgaria through the MyCOAST project. -
The Economy of the Tyle State
SAVAGE BUSINESS – The Economy of the Tyle State One would imagine that an invasion by hundreds of thousands of barbarians would have a catastrophic effect on a region’s economy. However, this presumption has been challenged in recent years by the archaeological and numismatic data emerging from the territory which fell under the control of the ‘barbarian’ Tyle state in eastern Thrace during the 3rd c. BC. The traditional description of the Celtic tribes who arrived in this area has been one of ‘thirsty savages’ or ‘gangs of mercenaries’ (latest Emilov 2007, 2010), and we have been repeatedly informed that ‘their aim was not to settle, but money and booty which could be aquired in different ways … by attacking wealthy cities, and by ravaging the countryside’ (Nixon 1977, cited by Mitchell 1993; most recently Emilov 2010). However, repeating a simplistic stereotype does not make it true, particularly when the depiction of a culture directly contradicts all the available archaeological and historical evidence. In this case the facts tell a rather surprising tale – a barbarian invasion that brought political stability and economic prosperity in its wake. Eastern Thrace – 3rd c. BC THE ‘BARBARIAN BOOM’ Recent archaeological evidence has clearly shown that no destruction accompanied the Celtic migration at the beginning of the 3rd c. BC and, even more surprisingly, in none of the regions which fell within the limits of the Celtic Tyle kingdom can an economic downturn be detected (Lazarov 2010: 110). Indeed, it is precisely in the wake of the establishment of the Celtic state that the main Hellenistic economic centres in eastern Thrace and the Black Sea coast such as Kabyle, Mesambria and Odessos flourished and trade boomed. -
Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands
Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands Kyiv–2003 Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands: Revised and updated. — Kyiv: Wetlands International, 2003. — 235 pp., 81 maps. — ISBN 90 5882 9618 Published by the Black Sea Program of Wetlands International PO Box 82, Kiev-32, 01032, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Editor: Gennadiy Marushevsky Editing of English text: Rosie Ounsted Lay-out: Victor Melnychuk Photos on cover: Valeriy Siokhin, Vasiliy Kostyushin The presentation of material in this report and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expres- sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Wetlands International concerning the legal status of any coun- try, area or territory, or concerning the delimitation of its boundaries or frontiers. The publication is supported by Wetlands International through a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries of the Netherlands and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands (MATRA Fund/Programme International Nature Management) ISBN 90 5882 9618 Copyright © 2003 Wetlands International, Kyiv, Ukraine All rights reserved CONTENTS CONTENTS3 6 7 13 14 15 16 22 22 24 26 28 30 32 35 37 40 43 45 46 54 54 56 58 58 59 61 62 64 64 66 67 68 70 71 76 80 80 82 84 85 86 86 86 89 90 90 91 91 93 Contents 3 94 99 99 100 101 103 104 106 107 109 111 113 114 119 119 126 130 132 135 139 142 148 149 152 153 155 157 157 158 160 162 164 164 165 170 170 172 173 175 177 179 180 182 184 186 188 191 193 196 198 199 201 202 4 Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands 203 204 207 208 209 210 212 214 214 216 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 230 232 233 Contents 5 EDITORIAL AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Directory is based on the national reports prepared for the Wetlands International project ‘The Importance of Black Sea Coastal Wetlands in Particular for Migratory Waterbirds’, sponsored by the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries. -
Profil Organizație Non - Guvernamentală
PROFIL ORGANIZAȚIE NON - GUVERNAMENTALĂ Denumirea organizației: ONG "GAL Balcic - General Toshevo" Denumirea în limba engleză: LAG Balcic - General Toshevo Înregistrare: Dosar de firmă 13 - 13.04.2016 / Tribunalul regional Dobrich Tip: Asociație pentru beneficii comunitare Detalii de contact: Adresa: Balcic, str. Dionisopolis 3 Telefon: 0888644349 E-mail: [email protected] Site web: http://www.mig-Balcic-toshevo.bg/ Reprezentantul / persoana de contact și poziția din cadrul organizației: Rositsa Popova / Director Executiv Calitatea de membru în alte organizații: NU Domeniul de activitate : Protecția mediului înconjurător Sprijin pentru afaceri Învățământ implementarea strategiei de Dezvoltare locală Activități sociale ………………………………. Activități de tineret …………………………………. Cultura …………………………………… Sport și activități fizice ……………………………………… Către cine sunt îndreptate activitatea dvs. / grupele țintă? . PRODUCATORI AGRICOLI . INDUSTRIA PRELUCRĂTOARE . HOTELURI ȘI RESTAURANTE . COMERȚ; REPARAREA AUTOVEHICULELOR ȘI A MOTOCICLETELOR . INSTITUȚII CULTURALE . ALTE STRUCTURI DE SOCIETATE CIVILĂ www.interregrobg.eu Съдържанието на този материал не представлява непременно официалната позиция на Европейския съюз. ALTE PĂRȚI INTERESATE Grupuri țintă pentru Programul de dezvoltare rurală: Măsura 4.1 "Investiții în exploatații agricole" 1. Fermierii a căror exploatație are un volum de producție standard de peste 8.000 EUR; 2. Grupuri de producători recunoscuți și organizații de producători recunoscute de produse agricole sau cele aprobate pentru asistență financiară în cadrul măsurii 9 „Înființarea grupurilor și organizațiilor de producători” din PDR 2014-2020. 3. Doar persoanele juridice înregistrate în temeiul Legii comerciale și / sau a legii privind cooperativele, care includ cel puțin 6 persoane și care nu sunt înscrise în articolele 1 și 2, pot solicita sprijin pentru proiecte de investiții colective. Măsura 4.2 "Investiții în prelucrarea / comercializarea produselor agricole" 1. -
Maritime Spatial Plan for the Cross-Border Area Mangalia
Marine spatial plan for the cross-border area Mangalia Shabla Current situation analysis EUROPEAN COMMISSION Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) Department A - COSME, H2020 SME and EMFF Unit A3 - EMFF Call reference No: MARE/2014/22 Project Full Name: Cross border maritime spatial planning in the Black Sea – Romania and Bulgaria (MARSPLAN – BS) Project No: EASME/EMFF/2014/1.2.1.5/2/SI2.707672 MSP LOT 1 /BLACK SEA/MARSPLAN-BS European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) Marine spatial plan for the cross-border area Mangalia Shabla Volume 1 Current situation analysis - topic paper DELIVRABLE Page 1 Marine spatial plan for the cross-border area Mangalia Shabla Current situation analysis 1. Introduction to specific problems of the area The marine spatial plan for Mangalia-Shabla area was conceived as a pilot project included in MATSPLAN -BS project in order to test the capacities of the two countries to develop and adopt a concrete instrument for the management of the marine area. This plan takes into consideration the existing data describing the processes of the natural marine areas as well as the human activities developed in this area in order to establish balance between human actions and ecosystems subsistence. The plan is meant also to to put into practice the EU Directive for MSP, creating an institutional framework for MSP implementation in Romania and Bulgaria, enhancing the cross-border cooperation and exchange of information between the two countries. 1.1 Plan area delimitation The spatial plan area is located at the border between Romania and Bulgaria, its delimitation took into consideration two types of zones: the territorial waters (the management area) and coastal area and EEZ (the extended analyse area for the study of interactions). -
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/663
Official Journal L 112 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 26 April 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ★ Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation ..................................................................................................................... 1 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/658 of 2 March 2015 on the signing, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union ................................................. 2 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/659 of 8 April 2019 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union ................................................. 3 Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part 5 REGULATIONS ★ Commission Implementing Regulation