DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Journal L140

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Official Journal L 140 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 28 May 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/855 of 27 May 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran ............................................ 1 ★ Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/856 of 26 February 2019 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the operation of the Innovation Fund (1) .................................................................................. 6 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/857 of 27 May 2019 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 as a feed additive for dairy sheep and dairy goats and repealing Regulation (EC) No 226/2007 (holder of authorisation Danstar Ferment AG represented by Lallemand SAS) (1) ................................................................... 18 DECISIONS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/858 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Meeting of the Parties of the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA), and repealing the Decision of 12 June 2017 establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the Meeting of the Parties of the SIOFA ...................... 21 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/859 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO), and repealing the Decision of 12 June 2017 establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the SPRFMO ........................................................................................... 27 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/860 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), and repealing the Decision of 19 May 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the IOTC ................... 33 (1) Text with EEA relevance. (Continued overleaf) Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. EN The titles of all other acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. EN ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/861 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO), and repealing the Decision of 12 June 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the SEAFO .......................................................................................................................... 38 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/862 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), and repealing the Decision of 12 June 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the WCPFC ........... 44 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/863 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO), and repealing the Decision of 26 May 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the NAFO 49 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/864 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization (NASCO), and repealing the Decision of 26 May 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the NASCO ................................................................................................................ 54 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/865 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC), and repealing the Decision of 26 May 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the NEAFC 60 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/866 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the annual Conference of the Parties to the Convention on the Conservation and Management of Pollock Resources in the Central Bering Sea, and repealing the Decision of 12 June 2017 establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in that annual Conference ............................................................................................... 66 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/867 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), and repealing the Decision of 24 June 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the CCAMLR ............................................................... 72 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/868 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), and repealing the Decision of 8 July 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the ICCAT ................................................................................................. 78 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/869 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM), and repealing the Decision of 19 May 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the GFCM .................................................................................................................. 84 ★ Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/870 of 27 May 2019 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran ...................................................................... 90 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/871 of 26 March 2019 on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of the United Kingdom concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) for financial year 2018 (notified under document C(2019) 2357) .................................................................................................... 94 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/872 of 26 March 2019 on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies in the United Kingdom concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) for financial year 2018 (notified under document C(2019) 2358) .................................................................................. 98 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/873 of 22 May 2019 on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of Member States concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) for financial year 2018 (notified under document C(2019) 3817) ............................................................................................. 103 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/874 of 22 May 2019 on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of Member States concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) for financial year 2018 (notified under document C(2019) 3820) ................................................................................................................ 115 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/875 of 27 May 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2019) 4045) (1) .............. 123 (1) Text with EEA relevance. 28.5.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 140/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/855 of 27 May 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (1), and in particular Article 46(2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Whereas: (1) On 23 March 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 267/2012. (2) In accordance with Article 46(7) of Regulation (EU) No 267/2012, the Council has reviewed the list of designated persons and entities set out in Annex IX and Annex XIV to that Regulation. (3) The Council has concluded that 17 entries included in Annex IX to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 should be updated. (4) Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 Annex IX to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation. Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. (1) OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1. L 140/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 28.5.2019 This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 27 May 2019. For the Council The President N. HURDUC 28.5.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 140/3 ANNEX Annex
Recommended publications
  • Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha

    Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha

    “CONSERVATION OF THE WINTERING POPULATION OF THE GLOBALLY THREATENED RED-BREASTED GOOSE (BRANTA RUFICOLLIS) IN BULGARIA” LIFE 09/NAT/BG/000230 Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha Goose Sensitivity Map for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha Anne Harrison Anne Harrison & Geoff Hilton Geoff Hilton Wildfowl & Wetlands & Wetlands Trust Trust 1 Goose Sensitivity Mapping for Wind Farm Development in Coastal Dobrudzha Contents 1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Requirement for wind energy............................................................................................. 4 1.2. Conservation legislation ..................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Potential effects of wind energy on geese .......................................................................... 5 1.4. Why geese, why Dobrudzha? ............................................................................................. 6 1.5. Sensitivity mapping as a planning tool ................................................................................ 7 2. Aim and purpose of this tool ...................................................................................................... 7 3. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.1. General
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR

    Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR

    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria

    1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria

    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
  • Official Journal L129

    Official Journal L129

    Official Journal L 129 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 17 May 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/791 of 16 May 2019 amending for the 302nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations ..................................................................................................... 1 DECISIONS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/792 of 13 May 2019 entrusting to the European Commission — the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) — the exercise of certain powers conferred on the appointing authority and the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment ............................................................... 3 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/793 of 16 May 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2019) 3797) (1) ............... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ★ Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/794 of 15 May 2019 on a coordinated control plan with a view to establishing the prevalence of certain substances migrating from materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (notified under document C(2019) 3519) (1) .......... 37 (1) Text with EEA relevance. (Continued overleaf)
  • Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste

    Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste

    Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for
  • Montana District VALCHEDRAM BRUSARTSI Medkovets Yakimovo > Population (2015) 138,269 BOYCHINOVTSI > Area (Sq

    Montana District VALCHEDRAM BRUSARTSI Medkovets Yakimovo > Population (2015) 138,269 BOYCHINOVTSI > Area (Sq

    LOM Montana District VALCHEDRAM BRUSARTSI Medkovets Yakimovo > Population (2015) 138,269 BOYCHINOVTSI > Area (sq. km) 3,635.6 MONTANA > Number of settlements 131 CHIPROVTSI Georgi > Share of urban population (%) 63.4 Damyanovo BERKOVITSA VARSHETS Overview here has been a considerable lag in Montana’s econom- Montana is one of the districts most seriously affected by ic development. In 2015, employment rates shrank, the country’s demographic crisis. The educational system Twhich entailed a drop in salary incomes, consequently, in has been successful in enrolling a substantial part of the eli- average incomes in the district too. Montana remains the gible for education but the deteriorating grades at matricu- least attractive district for foreign investment, and the mu- lation exams indicate a decline in quality. Healthcare quali- nicipalities in the district have failed to compensate the ty is close to the country average, and the environment is in lack of private investment with sufficient EU fund utiliza- a relatively good condition. Though crime rates have been tion. The low levels of taxes and fees and the relatively good below average, the clearance crime rate has gradually been administrative services have failed to compensate the in- falling and the judicial system is inefficient. The intensity of fluence of negative factors such as the poor infrastructural cultural activities is much lower than the national average development in the district. levels. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Weak Unsatisfactory Average Good Very good Weak Unsatisfactory Average Good Very good Income and Living Conditions Demography Labor Market Education Investment Healthcare Infrastructure Security and Justice Taxes and Fees Environment Administration Culture Montana District 49 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Income and Living Conditions Similar to its neighboring district, Vidin, Montana’s eco- the only other district where entrepreneurial activity is less nomic development has been lagging considerably behind vigorous is Kardzhali.
  • 2019/1212 of 16 July 2019 Amending the Annex to Implementing

    2019/1212 of 16 July 2019 Amending the Annex to Implementing

    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1212 of 16 July 2019 amending the Annex to 1 Implementing... ANNEX PART II Document Generated: 2020-12-16 Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1212, ANNEX. (See end of Document for details) ANNEX The Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU is replaced by the following: ANNEX PART I1.Belgium The following areas in Belgium: in Luxembourg province: 2.Bulgaria The following areas in Bulgaria: 3.Estonia The following areas in Estonia: 4.Hungary The following areas in Hungary: 5.Latvia The following areas in Latvia: 6.Lithuania The following areas in Lithuania: 7.Poland The following areas in Poland: 8.Romania The following areas in Romania: PART II 1. Belgium The following areas in Belgium: in Luxembourg province: — the area is delimited clockwise by: — La frontière avec la France au niveau de Florenville, — La N85 jusque son intersection avec la N894au niveau de Florenville, — La N894 jusque son intersection avec larue de la Motte, — La rue de la Motte jusque son intersection avec la rue de Neufchâteau, — La rue de Neufchâteau, — La rue des Bruyères jusque son intersection avec la rue de la Gaume, — La rue de la Gaume jusque son intersection avec la rue de l'Accord, — La rue de l'Accord, — La rue du Fet, — La N40 jusque son intersection avec la E25-E411, — La E25-E411 jusque son intersection avec la N81 au niveau de Weyler, — La N81 jusque son intersection avec la N883 au niveau d'Aubange, — La N883 jusque son intersection avec la N88 au niveau d'Aubange, — La N88 jusque son intersection avec la N811, — La N811 jusque son intersection avec la rue Baillet Latour, — La rue Baillet Latour jusque son intersection avec la N88, — La N88 jusque son intersection avec la N871, — La N871 jusque son intersection avec la N87 au niveau de Rouvroy, — La N87 jusque son intersection avec la frontière avec la France.
  • Contribution to the Estimation of Seismic Hazard

    Contribution to the Estimation of Seismic Hazard

    ACTIVE FAULT SYSTEMS IN THE SHABLA REGION (BULGARIA) AS INTERPRETED ON GEOPHYSICAL AND SEISMICITY DATA* IRINA STANCIU1,3, DUMITRU IOANE2,3 1 National Institute for Research and Development on Marine Geology and Geo-ecology – GeoEcoMar, Bucharest, [email protected] 2 Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, University of Bucharest, [email protected] 3 Romanian Society of Applied Geophysics Shabla region is located in NE Bulgaria and belongs from the tectonic point of view to the south-eastern part of the Moesian Platform. The study area covers parts of the eastern slope of the North Bulgarian arch, having the Bulgarian–Romanian border to the north, Cape Kaliakra to the south, Dobrich city to the west, and the Black Sea shelf to the east. Block faulting, horsts and grabens of different rank are the typical structural features. The crustal-scale Intramoesian Fault, considered to separate the Moesian Platform in two main compartments, reaches the Black Sea continental shelf in Shabla region, its path being ambiguously located on maps, as it does not outcrop. Analysis of regional seismicity data available from ROMPLUS Earthquake Catalogue and EMSC Earthquake Catalogue, integrated with available tectonic and geophysical data, as well as with geological, geomorphological and neotectonic field observations, offered the possibility to interpret W–E, NE–SW and NW–SE active fault systems within the study area and build the grounds for a much more comprehensive understanding of this region’s tectonics. Key words: geophysical data interpretation, regional seismicity, active faults, regional tectonics, Moesian Platform. 1. INTRODUCTION 2. GEOTECTONIC AND GEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK This study started during the bilateral scientific 2.1.
  • The Economy of the Tyle State

    The Economy of the Tyle State

    SAVAGE BUSINESS – The Economy of the Tyle State One would imagine that an invasion by hundreds of thousands of barbarians would have a catastrophic effect on a region’s economy. However, this presumption has been challenged in recent years by the archaeological and numismatic data emerging from the territory which fell under the control of the ‘barbarian’ Tyle state in eastern Thrace during the 3rd c. BC. The traditional description of the Celtic tribes who arrived in this area has been one of ‘thirsty savages’ or ‘gangs of mercenaries’ (latest Emilov 2007, 2010), and we have been repeatedly informed that ‘their aim was not to settle, but money and booty which could be aquired in different ways … by attacking wealthy cities, and by ravaging the countryside’ (Nixon 1977, cited by Mitchell 1993; most recently Emilov 2010). However, repeating a simplistic stereotype does not make it true, particularly when the depiction of a culture directly contradicts all the available archaeological and historical evidence. In this case the facts tell a rather surprising tale – a barbarian invasion that brought political stability and economic prosperity in its wake. Eastern Thrace – 3rd c. BC THE ‘BARBARIAN BOOM’ Recent archaeological evidence has clearly shown that no destruction accompanied the Celtic migration at the beginning of the 3rd c. BC and, even more surprisingly, in none of the regions which fell within the limits of the Celtic Tyle kingdom can an economic downturn be detected (Lazarov 2010: 110). Indeed, it is precisely in the wake of the establishment of the Celtic state that the main Hellenistic economic centres in eastern Thrace and the Black Sea coast such as Kabyle, Mesambria and Odessos flourished and trade boomed.
  • Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU Lays Down Animal Health Control Measures in Relation to African Swine Fever in Certain Member States

    Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU Lays Down Animal Health Control Measures in Relation to African Swine Fever in Certain Member States

    COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 9 October 2014 concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States and repealing Implementing Decision 2014/178/EU (notified under document C(2014) 7222) (Text with EEA relevance) 2014/709/EU (OJ No. L 295, 11.10.2014, p. 63) amended by (EU) 2015/251 (OJ No. L 41, 17.02.2015, p. 46) amended by (EU) 2015/558 (OJ No. L 92, 08.04.2015, p. 109) amended by (EU) 2015/820 (OJ No. L 129, 27.05.2015, p. 41) amended by (EU) 2015/1169 (OJ No. L 188, 16.07.2015, p. 45) amended by (EU) 2015/1318 (OJ No. L 203, 31.07.2015, p. 14) amended by (EU) 2015/1372 (OJ No. L 211, 08.08.2015, p. 34) amended by (EU) 2015/1405 (OJ No. L 218, 19.08.2015, p. 16) amended by (EU) 2015/1432 (OJ No. L 224, 27.08.2015, p. 39) amended by (EU) 2015/1783 (OJ No. L 259, 06.10.2015, p. 27) amended by (EU) 2015/2433 (OJ No. L 334, 22.12.2015, p. 46) amended by (EU) 2016/180 (OJ No. L 35, 11.02.2016, p. 12) amended by (EU) 2016/464 (OJ No. L 80, 31.03.2016, p. 36) amended by (EU) 2016/857 (OJ No. L 142, 31.05.2016, p. 14) amended by (EU) 2016/1236 (OJ No. L 202, 28.07.2016, p. 45) amended by (EU) 2016/1372 (OJ No. L 217, 12.08.2016, p. 38) amended by (EU) 2016/1405 (OJ L 228, 23.08.
  • Maritime Spatial Plan for the Cross-Border Area Mangalia

    Maritime Spatial Plan for the Cross-Border Area Mangalia

    Marine spatial plan for the cross-border area Mangalia Shabla Current situation analysis EUROPEAN COMMISSION Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) Department A - COSME, H2020 SME and EMFF Unit A3 - EMFF Call reference No: MARE/2014/22 Project Full Name: Cross border maritime spatial planning in the Black Sea – Romania and Bulgaria (MARSPLAN – BS) Project No: EASME/EMFF/2014/1.2.1.5/2/SI2.707672 MSP LOT 1 /BLACK SEA/MARSPLAN-BS European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) Marine spatial plan for the cross-border area Mangalia Shabla Volume 1 Current situation analysis - topic paper DELIVRABLE Page 1 Marine spatial plan for the cross-border area Mangalia Shabla Current situation analysis 1. Introduction to specific problems of the area The marine spatial plan for Mangalia-Shabla area was conceived as a pilot project included in MATSPLAN -BS project in order to test the capacities of the two countries to develop and adopt a concrete instrument for the management of the marine area. This plan takes into consideration the existing data describing the processes of the natural marine areas as well as the human activities developed in this area in order to establish balance between human actions and ecosystems subsistence. The plan is meant also to to put into practice the EU Directive for MSP, creating an institutional framework for MSP implementation in Romania and Bulgaria, enhancing the cross-border cooperation and exchange of information between the two countries. 1.1 Plan area delimitation The spatial plan area is located at the border between Romania and Bulgaria, its delimitation took into consideration two types of zones: the territorial waters (the management area) and coastal area and EEZ (the extended analyse area for the study of interactions).
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/663

    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/663

    Official Journal L 112 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 26 April 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ★ Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation ..................................................................................................................... 1 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/658 of 2 March 2015 on the signing, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union ................................................. 2 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/659 of 8 April 2019 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union ................................................. 3 Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part 5 REGULATIONS ★ Commission Implementing Regulation