DOCSLIB.ORG

An Annotated Checklist of Spiders Deposited in the Arachnida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 61: 11-19 Karlsruhe, April 2021 An annotated checklist of spiders deposited in the Arachnida collection of the Institute of Zoology, Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology of the NAS RA, Yerevan, Armenia. Part I Noushig A. Zarikian & Mark Y. Kalashian doi: 10.30963/aramit6102 Abstract. Data on Armenian spider species are summarized. A catalogue of spiders collected during 1988–1998 and deposited in the Institute of Zoology collection, Yerevan, Armenia is given. The review revealed 20 species belonging to nine families. Fourteen species are recorded for Armenia for the first time. Thus, the number of spider species known from Armenia rises to 190. Liocranum rupicola (Walckenaer, 1830) is recorded for the first time in the Caucasus. Keywords: Araneae, Caucasus, country list, new records Zusammenfassung. Kommentierte Checkliste der Spinnentiersammlung des Institute of Zoology, Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology of NAS RA, Jerewan, Armenien. Teil I. Die Daten zu den Spinnen Armeniens werden zusammengefasst. Wir erstel- len einen Katalog der 1988–1998 gesammelten Spinnen, die in der Sammlung des Instituts für Zoologie in Jerewan, Armenien, hinterlegt sind. Diese Liste enthält 20 Arten aus neun Familien. Vierzehn Arten werden erstmals für Armenien nachgewiesen, dadurch erhöht sich die bekannte Artensumme für Armenien auf 190. Liocranum rupicola (Walckenaer, 1830) wird erstmals für den Kaukasus gemeldet. Ամփոփում. ՀՀ ԳԱԱ կենդանաբանության եվ հիդրոէկոլոգիայի գիտական կենտրոնի սարդակերպերի հավաքածուում պահպանված սարդերի մեկնաբանված ստուգացանկ, ՀՀ ԳԱԱ կենդանաբանության եվ հիդրոէկոլոգիայի գիտական կենտրոն, Երևան, Հայաստան: Մաս I. Սույն հոդվածով ամփոփվում են Հայաստանի սարդերի տեսակային կազմի վերաբերյալ տվյալները: Ներկայացված է 1988–1998 թվականներին հավաքված և Կենդանաբանության ինստիտուտի հավաքածուում պահպանված սարդերի ստուգացուցակ, Երևան, Հայաստան: Ուսումնասիրությունը պարունակում է ինը ընտանիքի պատկանող 20 տեսակ սարդերի տվյալներ, որոնցից տասնչորսը գրանցվել է առաջին անգամ Հայաստանում: Այսպիսով, Հայաստանից հայտնի սարդերի քանակը հասել է 190-ի: Կովկասում առաջին անգամ է գրանցվում Liocranum rupicola (Walckenaer, 1830) տեսակը: Spiders are a little studied group of animals in the Armenian The number of spider species from Armenia given in fauna, along with most other invertebrates. Spiders from Ar­ other sources is very low. In the comprehensive check­list of menia were first mentioned by Koch (1878) and Kulczyński the spiders of the former Soviet Union territories, Mikhailov (1895). Only a few papers on spiders from areas within the (2013) listed 118 spider species for Armenia, adding nine contemporary boundaries of Armenia have been published more species in Addendum 2 to the Catalogue (Mikhailov since (Charitonov 1936, 1956, Mcheidze 1964, 1997, Ovt­ 1999). Summarizing further data, he mentioned 141 species sharenko 1982, 1994, Wesołowska 1986, Eskov 1987, Tana­ for Armenia (Mikhailov 2016) and 15 more spider species are sevitch 1987, 1990, Dunin 1984, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, listed for the country by Mikhailov & Propistsova (2017). Fi­ Marusik 1989, Mikhailov 1986, 1987, 1990, 1992, 2003, nally, in the on­line Faunistic Database on the Spiders of the 2013, 2016). Some important papers for the study of the Ar­ Caucasus Ecoregion (Otto 2020) the list of Armenian spi­ menian spider fauna were published by D. V. Logunov (Lo­ ders includes 163 species – while Nentwig et al. (2020) have gunov 1996, 1998, 1999, 2015, Logunov & Guseinov 2002, 162 recorded species – not including the latest publication 2008, Rakov & Logunov 1997, Zyuzin & Logunov 2000). (Zarikian 2020), which added thirteen species such that the Vadimir Zacharjan, who was the main collector of our mate­ formal recorded species number of spiders in Armenia is 176. rial, wrote a single publication (Dunin & Zacharjan 1991). This paper aims to provide new data on the spiders of Ar­ Based on his material, Zacharjan provided some data on menia. The material is kept in the collection of the Institute spiders to the country’s First National Report to the Conven­ of Zoology, Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology, tion of Biological Diversity (H. Khachatryan pers. comm.). National Academy of Sciences of Armenia. While 302 species belonging to 30 families are quoted for the Armenian fauna in the First National Report (Ministry of Materials and methods Nature Protection 1999; families are listed only in the Arme­ The material was collected between 1988–1998 from various nian version of the Report, Annex 9). In the Fifth National sites in Armenia (Fig. 1 and Tab. 1) by staff of our Institute, Report, 325 spider species are quoted (Ministry of Nature Dr. Vladimir Zacharjan and Arthur Sukiasyan, and utilised Protection 1999, Appendix 3; the number “600 species” men­ sweeping, pitfall trapping and visual search and collecting tioned in Appendix 4 is an obvious mistake). Unfortunately, systems. The material is kept in 70% ethanol. Most of the Zacharjan’s unpublished list of species, which served a back­ material was identified by the collectors themselves and part ground for these numbers, is lost. of it by the first author of the present paper based on Jones­ Walters (1989) and Nentwig et al. (2020). Approximate GPS Noushig A. ZARIKIAN, Mark Y. KALASHIAN, Scientific Centre of Zoology and Hyd- data based on the field notes are given in Tab. 1. In the list of roecology, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, P. Sevak Str. 7, Yerevan 0014, species, the order of families and species follows that of Otto Armenia; E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] (2020). The world distribution is taken from the World Spi­ Academic editor: Petr Dolejš der Catalog (2020) and the distribution in the Caucasus from submitted: 3.9.2020, accepted: 1.2.2021, online: 5.3.2021 Otto (2020) and Nentwig et al. (2020). The data on habitats 12 N. A. Zarikian & M. Y. Kalashian are based on the field experience of the second author and do Distribution. Europe, North Caucasus, Georgia, Azerbaijan, not refer to precise collection sites, however, they match the Africa, Asia, Australia, New Zealand and numerous islands, Armenian habitat at that time. An abbreviated checklist of introduced to the Americas. New record for the Armenian Armenian spider species is given in Tab. 2. fauna. Tab. 1: Collecting sites Habitat. Warm corners, occupied and abandoned buildings. Site Site name coordinates Altitude No. (m a.s.l.) Family Tetragnathidae Tetragnatha dearmata Thorell, 1873 1 Tumanyan 40.5900°N 44.3900°E 857 ( Material examined. 1 , Jrarat, “Vordan karmir” state sanc­ 2 Hankavan 40.6282°N 44.5342°E 1900 ) (( 3 Sevan 40.3440°N 44.5835°E 2020 tuary, 13. Aug. 1994; 1 , 3 , Meghri, 2. Jun. 1989, all V. 4 Yerevan 40.1240°N 44.3330°E 1230 Zacharjan leg. 5 Jrarat, “Vordan karmir” 40.0755°N 44.2401°E 840 Distribution. North America, Europe, North Caucasus, state sanctuary Azerbaijan, Russia (from European part to Far East). New 6 Goght 40.1375°N 44.8138°E 1750 record for the Armenian fauna. 7 “Khosrov forest” State between –1300– Habitat. Wetlands or in the vicinity of water. Reserve, Vedi area 39.9700°N 44.8700°E 1460 and Tetragnatha extensa (Linnaeus, 1758) (( 39.9900°N 44.9000°E Material examined. 3 , Jrarat, “Vordan karmir” state sanc­ (( 8 Yeghegnadzor 39.7422°N 45.3283°E 1242 tuary, 1. May 1996; 4 , env. Sevan town, 17. Jun. 1998, all 9 Areni 39.7227°N 45.1906°E 1081 A. Sykiasyan leg. 10 Kapan 39.1227°N 46.2420°E 780 Distribution. North America, Greenland, Europe, Turkey, 11 Gudemnis 38.9381°N 46.1784°E 1350 North Caucasus Georgia, Azerbaijan, Russia (from European 12 Meghri 38.9058°N 46.2540°E 1193 part to Far East), Iraq, Iran, Kazakhstan, Central Asia, China, Korea, Japan. In Armenia recorded in the Armenian highland List of species by Mikhailov (2000). Habitat. Grasslands and in low vegetation, especially at the Family Pholcidae waterside and in wetlands. Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775) )) (( )) Material examined: 2 , 6 , Areni, 22. May 1988; 2 , Tetragnatha montana Simon, 1874 (( )) (( ) 6 , Yerevan, 4. May 1993; 2 , 6 , env. Tumanyan, 6. Apr. Material examined. 1 , Khosrov Forest State Reserve, Vedi 1991, all V. Zacharjan leg. area, 25. Jun. 1998, A. Sykiasyan leg. Fig. 1: Map of Armenia with collect- ing sites (Map provided by Philippe Rekacewicz, Emmanuelle Bournay, UNEP/GRID-Arendal. https://www. grida.no/resources/5338) 1 – Tumanyan; 2 – Hankavan; 3 – Sevan; 4 – Yerevan; 5 – Jrarat; 6 – Goght; 7 – Khosrov; 8 – Yeghegnadzor; 9 – Areni; 10 – Kapan; 11 – Gudemnis; 12 – Meghri Armenian spiders 1 13 ( Distribution. Europe, Turkey, North Caucasus, Georgia, area, 22. May 1990; 1 , Yerevan 10. Aug. 1992, both V. Zach­ Azerbaijan, Russia (from European part to Far East), Central arjan leg. Asia. New record for the Armenian fauna. Distribution. Albania, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Greece, Habitat. Low vegetation in a variety of habitats, mostly at Turkey, Ukraine, Russia (European part), North Caucasus, low altitudes. Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Iran, Central Asia. In Ar­ menia, recorded in the Armenian highland by Mikhailov Tetragnatha nigrita Lendl, 1886 (2013). (( ( Material examined. 2 , Gudemnis, 13. Jun. 1989; 1 , Ka­ Habitat. Dry, warm and rocky areas and steppes. pan, 5. Jun. 1989, all V. Zacharjan leg. Distribution. Europe, North Caucasus, Georgia, Azerbai­ Family Dictynidae jan, Russia (from European part to Far East), Central Asia, Argenna patula (Simon, 1874) ( China, Japan. New record for the Armenian fauna. Material examined. 1 , Khosrov Forest State Reserve, Vedi Habitat. Arable and waterside lands. area, 17. Aug. 1992, V. Zacharjan leg. Distribution. Europe, Azerbaijan, Russia (Europe to South Tetragnatha pinicola L. Koch, 1870 Siberia), Kyrgyzstan, China. New record for the Armenian ( ) Material examined. 1 , 1 , Sevan town, 17. Jun. 1998, fauna. A. Sykiasyan leg. Habitat. Banks of tidal rivers. Distribution. Europe, Turkey, North Caucasus, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Russia (from European part to Far East), Cen­ Family Anyphaenidae tral Asia, China, Korea, Japan. New record for the Armenian Anyphaena accentuata (Walckenaer, 1802) ) fauna. Material examined. 1 , Hankavan, 14. Jun. 1990, A. Syki­ Habitat. Woodland clearings and rides.
Recommended publications
  • Newsletter 61 (January 2001)

    Newsletter 61 (January 2001)

    AUSTRALASIAN ARACHNOLOGY Number 61: January 2001 Price $2 ISSN 0811-3696 Australasian Arachnology No. 61 Page 1 THE AUSTRALASIAN ARTICLES ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY The newsletter depends on your contributions ! We encourage articles on a We aim to promote interest in the ecology, range of topics including current research behaviour and taxonomy of arachnids of activities, student projects, upcoming the Australasian region. events or notable behavioural observations. MEMBERSHIP Please send articles to the editor as : Membership is open to amateurs, students i) email attachments, in text, or preferably and professionals, and is managed by our MS Word, format to: Administrator : tracey .churchill@ terc.csiro.au Richard J. Faulder Agricultural Institute ii) typed or legibly written articles on one Yanco, New South Wales 2703. Australia. side of A4 paper, or on disk (returned only upon request) to : email: [email protected] Dr Tracey Churchill Membership fees in Australian dollars CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems per 4 issues : PMB 44 Winnellie N.T. 0822. Australia. Discount* Normal Institutional Australian $8 $10 $12 LIBRARY NZ/ Asia $10 $12 $14 The AAS has a large number of reference Elsewhere $12 $14 $16 books, scientific journals and scientific papers available for loan or as All postage includes air mail. photocopies, for those members who do not have access to a scientific library. *Discount rates for pensioners, students Professional members are encouraged to and unemployed (provide proof of status send in their arachnological reprints. and students to include no. years enrolled). Contact our librarian : Cheques payable in Australian dollars to: Jean-Claude Herremans 'The Australasian Arachnological Society''. P.O.
  • Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Times and Biogeography of Spiders of the Subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang A, , Wayne P

    Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Times and Biogeography of Spiders of the Subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang A, , Wayne P

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68 (2013) 81–92 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molec ular Phylo genetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular phylogeny, divergence times and biogeography of spiders of the subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang a, , Wayne P. Maddison a,b a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 b Department of Botany and Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: We investigate phylogenetic relationships of the jumping spider subfamily Euophryinae, diverse in spe- Received 10 August 2012 cies and genera in both the Old World and New World. DNA sequence data of four gene regions (nuclear: Revised 17 February 2013 28S, Actin 5C; mitochondrial: 16S-ND1, COI) were collected from 263 jumping spider species. The molec- Accepted 13 March 2013 ular phylogeny obtained by Bayesian, likelihood and parsimony methods strongly supports the mono- Available online 28 March 2013 phyly of a Euophryinae re-delimited to include 85 genera. Diolenius and its relatives are shown to be euophryines. Euophryines from different continental regions generally form separate clades on the phy- Keywords: logeny, with few cases of mixture. Known fossils of jumping spiders were used to calibrate a divergence Phylogeny time analysis, which suggests most divergences of euophryines were after the Eocene. Given the diver- Temporal divergence Biogeography gence times, several intercontinental dispersal event sare required to explain the distribution of euophry- Intercontinental dispersal ines. Early transitions of continental distribution between the Old and New World may have been Euophryinae facilitated by the Antarctic land bridge, which euophryines may have been uniquely able to exploit Diolenius because of their apparent cold tolerance.
  • Powerpoint Bemutató

    Powerpoint Bemutató

    Mezőfi et al., 2020: Beyond polyphagy and opportunism: natural prey of hunting spiders in the canopy of apple trees. Supplemental figures Arboreal hunting spider assemblage 1.72 2 GLM-g, F1,647 = 235.74, P < 0.001, R = 0.23 exp(-0.82 + 0.526x) 4 Season: Spring Summer 3 Fall 2 1.13 Prey width (mm)Prey thorax 1 0 0 1 2 3 Spider prosoma width (mm) Figure S1: Relationship between spider prosoma and prey thorax widths (jittered, N=649) for the arboreal hunting spider assemblage. On the marginal boxplots red squares indicate the mean values. Spring 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 Prey taxa Spiders N=325 C.xanth O.salt Ph.cesp E.tri Xys Club Prey Natural economic enemy Neutral Pest Figure S2: Spring aspect (N=325); throphic interactions between the most abundant hunting spider groups and the arthropod community in the canopy of apple trees in spring. The middle bars represent spider groups and upper and bottom bars represent the spiders’ prey divided taxonomically and according their economic status. The width of the links between the trophic levels depict the frequency of interactions and bar widths indicate the relative abundance of each category. Numbers refer to following prey taxa: 1 Acari, 2 Araneae, 3 Coleoptera, 4 Lepidoptera, 5 Formicidae, 6 Other Hymenoptera, 7 Brachycera, 8 Nematocera, 9 Auchenorrhyncha, 10 Heteroptera, 11 Sternorrhyncha, 13 Neuroptera, 16 Trichoptera; Spiders: C.xanth = Carrhotus xanthogramma, O.salt = Other salticids, Ph.cesp = Philodromus cespitum, E.tri = Ebrechtella tricuspidata, Xys = Xysticus spp., Club = Clubiona spp.
  • The Spider Collection (Arachnida: Araneae) of the Zoological Museum of the Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, with New Species Records for Iran

    The Spider Collection (Arachnida: Araneae) of the Zoological Museum of the Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, with New Species Records for Iran

    Arachnologische Mitteilungen 50: 11-18 Karlsruhe, November 2015 The spider collection (Arachnida: Araneae) of the Zoological Museum of the Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, with new species records for Iran Alireza Zamani doi: 10.5431/aramit5002 Abstract. The spider collection of the Zoological Museum of the Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection was studied during the summer of 2014. A total of 180 specimens, belonging to 25 families, 60 genera and 77 species were documented. Of these, the following nine species could be recorded from Iran for the first time: Alopecosa schmidti (Hahn, 1835), Anyphaena accentuata (Walckenaer, 1802), Crustulina sticta (O. P.-Cambridge, 1861), Enoplo- gnatha mordax (Thorell, 1875), Ero tuberculata (De Geer, 1778), Salticus zebraneus (C. L. Koch, 1837), Pardosa aenig- matica Tongiorgi, 1966, Pardosa nebulosa (Thorell, 1872) and Tmarus piochardi (Simon, 1866). Morphological and geographical data are provided for the newly recorded species. Two species (P. aenigmatica and T. piochardi) are illustrated and a map of localities is given. Keywords: fauna, Lycosidae, museum collection, Thomisidae Zusammenfassung. Die arachnologische Sammlung (Arachnida: Araneae) des Zoologischen Museums des iranischen Forschungsinstitutes für Pflanzenschutz, mit neuen Artnachweisen für den Iran. Im Sommer 2014 wurde die arachnologische Sammlung des Zoologischen Museums des iranischen Forschungsinstitutes für Pflan- zenschutz untersucht. Insgesamt 180 Individuen, die sich auf 25 Familien, 60 Gattungen und 77 Arten verteilen, konnten dabei vorgefunden werden. Darunter befanden sich insgesamt neun Neufunde für den Iran: Alopecosa schmidti (Hahn, 1835), Anyphaena accentuata (Walckenaer, 1802), Crustulina sticta (O. P.-Cambridge, 1861), Enoplog- natha mordax (Thorell, 1875), Ero tuberculata (De Geer, 1778), Salticus zebraneus (C. L.
  • Higher-Level Phylogenetics of Linyphiid Spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae) Based on Morphological and Molecular Evidence

    Higher-Level Phylogenetics of Linyphiid Spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae) Based on Morphological and Molecular Evidence

    Cladistics Cladistics 25 (2009) 231–262 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00249.x Higher-level phylogenetics of linyphiid spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae) based on morphological and molecular evidence Miquel A. Arnedoa,*, Gustavo Hormigab and Nikolaj Scharff c aDepartament Biologia Animal, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, E-8028 Barcelona, Spain; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; cDepartment of Entomology, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Accepted 19 November 2008 Abstract This study infers the higher-level cladistic relationships of linyphiid spiders from five genes (mitochondrial CO1, 16S; nuclear 28S, 18S, histone H3) and morphological data. In total, the character matrix includes 47 taxa: 35 linyphiids representing the currently used subfamilies of Linyphiidae (Stemonyphantinae, Mynogleninae, Erigoninae, and Linyphiinae (Micronetini plus Linyphiini)) and 12 outgroup species representing nine araneoid families (Pimoidae, Theridiidae, Nesticidae, Synotaxidae, Cyatholipidae, Mysmenidae, Theridiosomatidae, Tetragnathidae, and Araneidae). The morphological characters include those used in recent studies of linyphiid phylogenetics, covering both genitalic and somatic morphology. Different sequence alignments and analytical methods produce different cladistic hypotheses. Lack of congruence among different analyses is, in part, due to the shifting placement of Labulla, Pityohyphantes,
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk

    Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk

    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
  • Diversity of Spiders from Zolambi Region of Chandoli National Park

    Diversity of Spiders from Zolambi Region of Chandoli National Park

    IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSR-JPBS) e-ISSN: 2278-3008, p-ISSN:2319-7676. Volume 10, Issue 2 Ver. 1 (Mar -Apr. 2015), PP 30-33 www.iosrjournals.org Diversity of Spiders from Zolambi Region of Chandoli National Park Dr. Suvarna More Dept. of Zoology P. V. P. Mahavidyalaya, Kavathe Mahankal, Dist. -Sangli. (MS), India 416405 Abstract: Diversity of spiders from Zolambi region of Chandoli National Park in Western Ghats is studied for the first time. A total of 90 species belonging to 55 genera and 19 families are recorded from the study area during 2011-2013 with a dominance of Araneid, Salticid and Lycosid spiders. Key words: Spider diversity, Western Ghats I. Introduction Spiders comprise one of the largest orders of animals. The spider fauna of India has never been studied in its entirety despite of contributions by many arachnologists since Stoliczka (1869). The pioneering contribution on the taxonomy of Indian spiders is that of European arachnologist Stoliczka (1869). Review of available literature reveals that the earliest contribution by Blackwall (1867); Karsch (1873); Simon (1887); Thorell (1895) and Pocock (1900) were the pioneer workers of Indian spiders. They described many species from India. Tikader (1980, 1982), Tikader, described spiders from India. Tikader (1980) compiled a book on Thomisidae spiders of India, comprising two subfamilies, 25 genera and 115 species. Pocock (1900) and Tikader (1980, 1987) made major contributions to the Indian Arachnology, have high lightened spider studies to the notice of other researcher. Tikader (1987) also published the first comprehensive list of Indian spiders, which included 1067 species belonging to 249 genera in 43 families.
  • Distribution of Spiders in Coastal Grey Dunes

    Distribution of Spiders in Coastal Grey Dunes

    kaft_def 7/8/04 11:22 AM Pagina 1 SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY D ISTRIBUTION OF SPIDERS IN COASTAL GREY DUNES Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY- ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL - ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL Dries Bonte Dispersal is crucial in structuring species distribution, population structure and species ranges at large geographical scales or within local patchily distributed populations. The knowledge of dispersal evolution, motivation, its effect on metapopulation dynamics and species distribution at multiple scales is poorly understood and many questions remain unsolved or require empirical verification. In this thesis we contribute to the knowledge of dispersal, by studying both ecological and evolutionary aspects of spider dispersal in fragmented grey dunes. Studies were performed at the individual, population and assemblage level and indicate that behavioural traits narrowly linked to dispersal, con- siderably show [adaptive] variation in function of habitat quality and geometry. Dispersal also determines spider distribution patterns and metapopulation dynamics. Consequently, our results stress the need to integrate knowledge on behavioural ecology within the study of ecological landscapes. / Promotor: Prof. Dr. Eckhart Kuijken [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Dries Bonte Conservation] Co-promotor: Prf. Dr. Jean-Pierre Maelfait [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Conservation] and Prof. Dr. Luc lens [Ghent University] Date of public defence: 6 February 2004 [Ghent University] Universiteit Gent Faculteit Wetenschappen Academiejaar 2003-2004 Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes: spatial patterns and evolutionary-ecological importance of dispersal Verspreiding van spinnen in grijze kustduinen: ruimtelijke patronen en evolutionair-ecologisch belang van dispersie door Dries Bonte Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor [Ph.D.] in Sciences Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen Promotor: Prof.
  • Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureş/Maros Valley

    Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureş/Maros Valley

    TISCIA monograph series Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley Edited by László Körmöczi Szeged-Arad 2012 Two countries, one goal, joint success! Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mureş River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Criş/Körös Rivers’ Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Someş/Szamos River Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1999. 4. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background, 1999. 5. L. Gallé and L. Körmöczi (eds.): Ecology of River Valleys, 2000. 6. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): Ecological Aspects of the Tisa River Basin, 2002. 7. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, I. 2005. 8. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, II. 2008. 9. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Ecological and socio-economic relations in the valleys of river Körös/Criş and river Maros/Mureş, 2011. 10. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley, 2012.
  • 196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists

    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists

    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area.
  • Catalogue of the Jumping Spiders of Northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae)

    Catalogue of the Jumping Spiders of Northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae)

    INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY OF ANIMALS, SIBERIAN BRANCH OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae) by D.V. Logunov & Yu.M. Marusik KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000 D. V. Logunov & Y. M. Marusik. Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000. 299 pp. In English. Ä. Â. Ëîãóíîâ & Þ. Ì. Ìàðóñèê. Êàòàëîã ïàóêîâ-ñêàêóí÷èêîâ Ñåâåðíîé Àçèè (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Ìîñêâà: èçäàòåëüñòâî ÊÌÊ. 2000. 299 ñòð. Íà àíãëèéñêîì ÿçûêå. This is the first complete catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia. It is based on both original data and published data dating from 1861 to October 2000. Northern Asia is defined as the territories of Siberia, the Russian Far East, Mongolia, northern provinces of China, and both Korea and Japan (Hokkaido only). The catalogue lists 216 valid species belonging to 41 genera. The following data are supplied for each species: a range character- istic, all available records from northern Asia with approximate coordinates (mapped), all misidentifications and doubtful records (not mapped), habitat preferences, references to available biological data, taxonomic notes on species where necessary, references to lists of regional fauna and to catalogues of general importance. 24 species are excluded from the list of the Northern Asian salticids. 5 species names are newly synonymized: Evarcha pseudolaetabunda Peng & Xie, 1994 with E. mongolica Danilov & Logunov, 1994; He- liophanus mongolicus Schenkel, 1953 with H. baicalensis Kulczyñski, 1895; Neon rostra- tus Seo, 1995 with N. minutus ¯abka, 1985; Salticus potanini Schenkel, 1963 with S.
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction

    Armenian Tourist Attraction

    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission