DOCSLIB.ORG

Wittenberg History Journal Spring 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wittenberg History Journal Spring 2014 Wittenberg History Journal Spring 2014 THE POLITICS OF LEADERSHIP: FROM ALEXANDER THE GREAT TO JOSEPH STALIN Wittenberg History Journal SPRING 2014 | VOLUME XLIII The Politics of Leadership: From Alexander the Great to Joseph Stalin Wittenberg University Springfield, Ohio 2014 Editorial Board Senior Editors Robert Everett ‘14 Audrey Zielenbach ‘14 Junior Editors Ashley R. Pierce ‘13 Clint Rodgers ‘14 Hannah Sanders ‘13 Faculty Advisor Joshua Paddison The Hartje Paper The Martha and Robert G. Hartje Award is presented annually to a senior in the spring semester. The History Department determines the three or four finalists who then write a 600 to 800 word narrative essay on an historical event or figure. The finalists must have at least a 2.7 grade point average and have completed at least six history courses. The winner is awarded $500 at a spring semester History Department colloquium and the winner paper is included in the History Journal. This year’s Hartje Award was presented to Clint Rodgers. On the Cover Sebastiano Conca, Alexander the Great in the Temple of Jerusalem, 1735-1737, Museo Nacional de Prado, Madrid. Address Correspondence to: Editor The Wittenberg History Journal Department of History Wittenberg University P. O. Box 720 Springfield, OH 45501-0720 Contents Hartje Award Winner The Nicely Family: The Effects of an Ohio Disaster Clint Rodgers I. NEW AppROACHES TO ALEXANDER 1 The Many Faces of Alexander the Great: Ruthlessness and Benevolence in the Asiatic Campaigns of 331-326 B.C.E. Madison Law 13 The Sexuality of Alexander the Great: From Arrian to Oliver Stone Maggie Jonsson II. POWER AND PLAGUE IN MEDIEVAL EUROPE 23 Family Ties to Anarchy: King Stephen and Empress Matilda Clint Rodgers 31 The Black Death: A Doctor’s Narrative Sarah Blanton 39 The Power of Medieval Queenship: Eleanor of Aquitaine and Blanche of Castile Jenna Langa III. MODERN DIPLOMACY 53 The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend: Soviet Foreign Policy in Europe, 1933-1939 Rob Everett Dedication This publication represents the hard work and tremendous efforts of the History Department’s students and professors, particularly the contributors and editors. We would like to dedicate this journal to Dr. Tammy Proctor, Professor of History for her commitment to improving and developing the History program here at Wittenberg. Your efforts regarding academic success and the overall structure and organization of the program have greatly influenced the development of the department as well as the experience of the faculty, staff, and most importantly the students. Thank you for making the Wittenberg History Department an example of excellence in academia, which allows or eth celebration of community and success through programs such as this journal. The History Journal Editorial Board The Nicely Family: The Effects of an Ohio Disaster Clint Rodgers The Ohio Flood of 1913 is recorded as the largest his family, but the excessive rain influenced his attitude. One weather disaster in the state’s history. For a five morning, they awoke to find their home and farm buildings day period, society was devastated. Lives were lost, completely surrounded by water. Rain continued to pour as crops were destroyed, and buildings were ruined. All Vernando and Ralph explored the region surrounding the lowlands and riverbeds were susceptible to incredible house. They found no escape route through the water: they flooding; therefore, no part of Ohio was unaffected. were trapped. On March 27, the last day of the rain, Norman had his second birthday. They were unable to fully celebrate This account of the Vernando Nicely family is based the event because pessimism overcame the evening easily. entirely in historical fact. Only some small details Dampness lurked in the very air they breathed and was a about the way Vernando experienced the situation are constant reminder of a potential inability to plant. the author’s speculation. The next day, Robert saw a boat coming through the Outside Bellevue, Ohio, Late March 1913 high water. Depressed as he was, not even the sight of rescue made Vernando feel better. Jennie answered the door and Vernando H. Nicely only resided in Bellevue for a short was told by the man to collect their essentials. They would time. Mr. Nicely was from Defiance; his wife, the former be taken into the city for shelter. She hurried about the Jennie O’Donnell, came from Wood County. Bellevue was house grabbing belongings. Vernando walked aimlessly, a clean slate for Vernando and his family. Like many others, comprehending his destruction in his waterlogged fields. the Nicelys arrived in Bellevue for employment. A city Bellevue would claim fate was against the Nicelys from at the crossroads of many different railroad lines, Bellevue the beginning. However, the next twist it had in store for was a bustling place that offered new chances. Vernando’s them was quite horrific. Just as they had gotten settled two brother-in-laws worked for the railroad there already. in the small boat with all of their essential belongings, a Though originally from Defiance, they brought their combination of a breeze and the distribution of weight families to Bellevue between 1905 and 1907. His other capsized the boat. All of the family fell into the water. After brother Cassius also moved to the Bellevue area to farm. By a few moments, Vernando, Jennie, and a rescuer were able to relocating, Vernando moved closer to the majority of his get everyone safely back on board. They, and their belongings, family, but also gave his children and wife a chance to restart were completely soaked. It was several hours before they after several setbacks, including the death of an infant son. were safely in town at Vernando’s sister’s house to dry. That In early March, Vernando prepared his crop. The fresh was the day he began to cough; the rainfall had not claimed start in Bellevue rejuvenated his family’s attitude. He had its last victim. three children: Ralph, 11; Robert, 5; and Norman, 2. Jennie Vernando Nicely died on June 30, 1913 of typhoid was pregnant again; he looked forward to the new addition fever, leaving his wife with four children. He was buried in to his family. A new baby was a symbol for hope. Economic Bellevue Cemetery, where you can still see his marker today. stability hinged on the survival of his crop; everything Vernando and the Nicelys were victims of the flood, just seemed to indicate joy coming to fruition. like many Ohio residents. Yet, rather than generalizing by Then the rain came. The skies opened and for five days saying that “lots of people died,” it is significant to examine straight water pummeled the earth, inundating his fields. a specific case and the grievous toil the flood took upon real Vernando felt cursed. Had God turned his back on him human beings. forever? He tried to act as though everything was normal for Vol. XLIII, Spring 2014 • 1 Bibliography Brown, Robert M. “The Ohio River Floods of 1913.” Bulletin of September 12, 1907. Accessed January 9, 2014. https:// the American Geographical Society. 45 (1913): 500-9. familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/X876-RPH. “Obituary of Vernando Nicely.” Bellevue Gazette. July 3, 1913. “Ohio, Deaths, 1908-1953.” Index and Images. FamilySearch. Daily Edition. Verando Hilton Nicely. June 30, 1913. Accessed January 9, “Ohio, County Marriages, 1789-1994.” Index and Images. Family 2014. https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/X86P-DMF. Search. Norman Nicely and Hazel Frombley. May 1938. U.S. Census, 1910. Provo, Utah: Ancestry.com Operations Inc., Accessed January 9, 2014. https://familysearch.org/pal:/ 2006. MM9.1.1/2Q48-Q1M. “Ohio, County Marriages, 1789-1994.” Index and Images. Family Search. Vernando H. Nicely and Jennie A. O’Donald. 2 • The Wittenberg History Journal Section I. New Approaches to Alexander Alexander the Great in the Battle of Issus, 333 B.C.E., House of the Faun, Pompeii. The Many Faces of Alexander the Great: Ruthlessness and Benevolence in the Asiatic Campaigns of 331-326 B.C.E. Madison Law As a historical figure, Alexander the Great inspires perhaps I. The Structure of Alexander’s Army more curiosity and confusion than many others. At times “With a small army, but distinguished for its intrinsic pitiless in his pursuit of greater territory and at others perfection, Alexander overthrew the decayed fabric of the merciful and benevolent towards those around him, Asiatic States: Without rest, and regardless of risks, he traversed the figure of Alexander is quite a contradictory one. By the breadth of Asia.”1 What would Alexander the Great examining multiple contemporary biographies of Alexander’s be without his vast army to voyage across deserts, rivers, life against and in conversation with the narratives put and mountains? After the death of Philip II in 336 B.C.E., forth by Plutarch and Arrian, a dualism emerges between Alexander inherited his father’s army, which had been built Alexander’s supposed ruthlessness and his actions of up and improved over the years into a formidable collection benevolence. Though he is frequently shown to distrustfully of phalanxes, or a rectangular military formation. It was purge members of his own inner circle and various others in organized primarily into several parts: “Macedonian troops, battle, he is also portrayed by historians as acting mercifully the phalanx battalions, territorially recruited, the Hypaspistai toward the kings of toppled empires and the captured or foot-guards, and the Companion cavalry or horse-guards, relations of said monarchs. remained his main striking force and the core of his army to In this paper I aim to explore this binary characterization the end. .”2 Most of the chief officers were Macedonian, and of Alexander in three overarching sections, beginning with it was this initial Macedonian force that would remain the an investigation of the structure of Alexander’s army and how nucleus of Alexander’s army, even when it would eventually he related with and commanded both the Macedonian and include Persians and other conquered ethnicities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Banks of Buck Creek
    spring 2009 On The Banks Of Buck Creek Alumnus And Professor Team Up To Transform Springfield Waterway Wittenberg Magazine is published three times a year by Wittenberg University, Office of University Communications. Editor Director of University Communications Karen Saatkamp Gerboth ’93 Graphic Designer Joyce Sutton Bing Design Director of News Services and Sports Information Ryan Maurer Director of New Media and Webmaster Robert Rafferty ’02 Photo Editor Erin Pence ’04 Coordinator of University Communications Phyllis Eberts ’00 Class Notes Editor Charyl Castillo Contributors Gabrielle Antoniadis Ashley Carter ’09 Phyllis Eberts ’00 Robbie Gantt Erik Larkin ’09 Karamagi Rujumba ’02 Brian Schubert ’09 Brad Tucker Address correspondence to: Editor, Wittenberg Magazine Wittenberg University P.O. Box 720 Springfield, Ohio 45501-0720 Phone: (937) 327-6111 Fax: (937) 327-6112 E-mail: [email protected] www.wittenberg.edu Articles are expressly the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent official university policy. We reserve the right to edit correspondence for length and accuracy. We appreciate photo submissions, but because of their large number, we cannot return them. Wittenberg University does not discriminate against otherwise qualified persons on the basis of race, creed, color, religion, national or ethnic origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, or disability unrelated to the student’s course of study, in admission or access to the university’s academic programs, activities, and facilities that are generally available to students, or in the administration of its educational policies, admissions policies, scholarship and loan programs, and athletic and other college-administered programs. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Editor, Wittenberg Magazine Wittenberg University P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctesias and His Eunuchs: a Challenge for Modern Historians 
    Histos () – CTESIAS AND HIS EUNUCHS: A CHALLENGE FOR MODERN HISTORIANS Abstract: The prominence of eunuchs in Ctesias’ account of Persia has given rise in the last decades to a paradoxical combination of scepticism about their historicity and realis- tic interpretation questioning whether they were in fact castrated. The present paper brings to light the difficulties of the assessment of them as historical figures. It first takes into account the fact that we know Ctesias’ eunuchs only through fragments, that is, through the filter of later authors who refer to him while possibly having a personal rela- tionship to eunuchs in their own society. It then describes the distinctive features of Cte- sias’ eunuchs within Greek literature on Persia and presents the main interpretative trends on them. It examines possible touchstones and shows how difficult it is to cross- check Ctesias’ account of eunuchs with Near Eastern evidence. It assesses the founda- tions of current prevailing positions, and shows that a hypothesis has become a— questionable—dogma on two sorts of historical referents for Ctesias’ εὐνοῦχοι . Last, it questions the pertinence of ‘orientalism’ as a label for the representation of eunuchs in Ctesias’ account, and even highlights its shortcomings. All in all, this issue is in fact a per- fect illustration of the methodological problems that modern historians often have to face when they try to study ancient Persia through the accounts of Greek historians. t is curious that a phenomenon which was so important in so many major civilizations has been virtually taboo in modern scholarship’: ‘I such were some of the concluding words of A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Symbol of Global Protec- 7 1 5 4 5 10 10 17 5 4 8 4 7 1 1213 6 JAPAN 3 14 1 6 16 CHINA 33 2 6 18 AF Tion for the Heritage of All Humankind
    4 T rom the vast plains of the Serengeti to historic cities such T 7 ICELAND as Vienna, Lima and Kyoto; from the prehistoric rock art 1 5 on the Iberian Peninsula to the Statue of Liberty; from the 2 8 Kasbah of Algiers to the Imperial Palace in Beijing — all 5 2 of these places, as varied as they are, have one thing in common. FINLAND O 3 All are World Heritage sites of outstanding cultural or natural 3 T 15 6 SWEDEN 13 4 value to humanity and are worthy of protection for future 1 5 1 1 14 T 24 NORWAY 11 2 20 generations to know and enjoy. 2 RUSSIAN 23 NIO M O UN IM D 1 R I 3 4 T A FEDERATION A L T • P 7 • W L 1 O 17 A 2 I 5 ESTONIA 6 R D L D N 7 O 7 H E M R 4 I E 3 T IN AG O 18 E • IM 8 PATR Key LATVIA 6 United Nations World 1 Cultural property The designations employed and the presentation 1 T Educational, Scientific and Heritage of material on this map do not imply the expres- 12 Cultural Organization Convention 1 Natural property 28 T sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of 14 10 1 1 22 DENMARK 9 LITHUANIA Mixed property (cultural and natural) 7 3 N UNESCO and National Geographic Society con- G 1 A UNITED 2 2 Transnational property cerning the legal status of any country, territory, 2 6 5 1 30 X BELARUS 1 city or area or of its authorities, or concerning 1 Property currently inscribed on the KINGDOM 4 1 the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther Extended Timeline Session 1
    TIMELINES: MARTIN LUTHER & CHRISTIAN HISTORY A. LUTHER the MAN (1483 – 1546) 1502: Receives B.A. at University of Erfurt 1505: Earns M.A. at Erfurt; begins to study law 1505 Luther “struck by lightning” and vows to become a monk 1505 Luther enters the Order of Augustinian Hermits 1507: Luther is ordained and celebrates his first Mass; he panics during the ceremony 1510: Luther visits Rome as representative of Augustinians 1511: Luther transfers to Wittenberg to teach at the new university. 1512: Luther earns his doctorate of theology 1513: Luther begins lecturing on The Psalms 1515: Luther lectures on Paul’s Epistles to the Romans 1517: October 31, he posts his “95 Theses (points to debate)” concerning indulgences on Wittenberg Church door. 1518: At meeting in Augsburg, Luther defends his theology & refuses to recant 1518: Elector Frederick the Wise of Saxony places Luther under his protection. 1519: In debates with Professor John Eck at Leipzig, Luther denies supreme authority of popes and councils 1520: Papal bull (Exsurge Domine) gives Luther 60 days to recant or be excommunicated 1520: Luther burns the papal bull and writes 3 seminal documents: “To the Christian Nobility,” “On the Babylonian Captivity of the Church,” & “The Freedom of a Christian” 1521: Luther is excommunicated by the papal bull Decet Romanum Pontificem 1521: He refuses to recant his writings at the Diet of Worms 1521: New HRE Charles V condemns Luther as heretic and outlaw Luther is “kidnapped” and hidden in Wartburg Castle Luther begins translating the New Testament
    [Show full text]
  • Mercenaries, Poleis, and Empires in the Fourth Century Bce
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts ALL THE KING’S GREEKS: MERCENARIES, POLEIS, AND EMPIRES IN THE FOURTH CENTURY BCE A Dissertation in History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies by Jeffrey Rop © 2013 Jeffrey Rop Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 ii The dissertation of Jeffrey Rop was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mark Munn Professor of Ancient Greek History and Greek Archaeology, Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Gary N. Knoppers Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Religious Studies, and Jewish Studies Garrett G. Fagan Professor of Ancient History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Kenneth Hirth Professor of Anthropology Carol Reardon George Winfree Professor of American History David Atwill Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies Graduate Program Director for the Department of History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines Greek mercenary service in the Near East from 401- 330 BCE. Traditionally, the employment of Greek soldiers by the Persian Achaemenid Empire and the Kingdom of Egypt during this period has been understood to indicate the military weakness of these polities and the superiority of Greek hoplites over their Near Eastern counterparts. I demonstrate that the purported superiority of Greek heavy infantry has been exaggerated by Greco-Roman authors. Furthermore, close examination of Greek mercenary service reveals that the recruitment of Greek soldiers was not the purpose of Achaemenid foreign policy in Greece and the Aegean, but was instead an indication of the political subordination of prominent Greek citizens and poleis, conducted through the social institution of xenia, to Persian satraps and kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • TOURISMUSPROFIL-Studie: Die Touristische Relevanz Von UNESCO
    Gliederung TOURISMUSPROFIL-STUDIE DIE TOURISTISCHE RELEVANZ VON UNESCO WELTERBESTÄTTEN UND NATIONALPARKS Berichtsband für das UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Wattenmeer Kundenorientierte Untersuchung der Markenstärke und Profileigenschaften Insgesamt 6.000 Befragte Ι Bevölkerungsrepräsentativ Berücksichtigung von 41 UNESCO Welterbestätten und 16 Nationalparks in Deutschland 1 Konzepte | Studien Management | Prozessbegleitung Projektdurchführung: Marktforschung | Destination Brand Trainings | Coaching Projektpartner: IMT Führendes Hochschulinstitut im Tourismus GfK untersucht weltweit, was Kunden kaufen und warum. 13.000 Mitarbeiter weltweit erschließen für die Auftraggeber Datenerhebung: der GfK relevante Erkenntnisse zur Steigerung der Effektivität und Wirkung Ihrer Marketingaktivitäten. Rechtlicher Hinweis: Die Ergebnisse der Tourismusprofil-Studie werden durch die inspektour GmbH herausgegeben. Das Institut für Management und Tourismus (IMT) der FH Westküste flankiert als Projektpartner. inspektour und das IMT sind generell daran interessiert, ausgewählte Ergebnisse in Form von Publikationen zu veröffentlichen. Die Urheberrechte, sofern nicht gesondert gekennzeichnet, liegen bei der inspektour GmbH. Die Auswertungsrechte liegen bei der inspektour GmbH. Eine uneingeschränkte Nutzung der Auswertungsergebnisse ist nicht gestattet. Es ist den Beziehern jedoch erlaubt, einzelne Resultate im Rahmen eigener Werke unter Nennung der Bezugsquelle der Erhebung/Auswertung und zwar wie folgt: „inspektour GmbH“ weiterzugeben oder zu veröffentlichen. In jeglichen
    [Show full text]
  • THE ESTABLISHMENT of the SAMARITAN RELIGION at MT. GERIZIM Intermarriage with Non-Believers
    THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SAMARITAN RELIGION AT MT. GERIZIM Intermarriage with non-believers (non-Jews) was an ongoing problem during the time of Ezra & Nehemiah. 457 It was a major concern of Ezra (Ezra 9-10) 444 Nehemiah specifically cited the avoiding of religious inter-marriage in his renewal of the covenant during the wall dedication ceremony (Nehemiah 10:28, 30; 13:1-3) 420’s? After returning to the Persian royal court in 433, Nehemiah later returned to Judea only to find that High Priest Eliashib had permitted Tobiah the Ammonite (to whom he was related by marriage) to use a temple storeroom as his Jerusalem residence; that the Laws regarding tithing & the Sabbath rest were being totally ignored; that many Jews had once again married non-Jews & were raising children who couldn’t even understand Biblical Hebrew; Nehemiah aggressively fixed all these problems (Nehemiah 13:4ff) Nehemiah also chased off an unnamed grandson of High Priest Eliashib because he had married the daughter of Sanballat of Samaria (Nehemiah 13:28-29) 1 The book of Malachi was probably written during this backslidden period The High Priesthood became a contested position of authority during the late Persian period (later 4th Century BC) c. 342 Bagoas, who was technically second-in-command under King Artaxerxes III (reigned 358-338 BC), was actually the real power behind the throne, particularly after he was instrumental in securing Egypt for the Persian Empire; shortly thereafter he promised the High Priesthood to a Jewish friend named Joshua (a grandson of Eliashib); when Joshua tried to take control from his brother, Johanan, the incumbent High Priest killed the challenger during an argument in the Temple; Bagoas personally entered the Temple, desecrating it (as a Gentile), and subsequently punished the Jews by fining them 50 shekels for each of the two lambs sacrificed daily 2 under Johanan’s authority as High Priest for the next seven years (Antiquities of the Jews 11.8.1) 338 When his influence over the Persian king began to wane, Bagoas poisoned Artaxerxes III (c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impossible Dream W. W. Tarn's Alexander in Retrospect*
    F LASHBACKS Karanos 2, 2019 77-95 The Impossible Dream W. W. Tarn’s Alexander in Retrospect* by A. Brian Bosworth The University of Western Australia First published in 1948, Tarn’s Alexander the Great was soon out of print. In 1956 the first volume was republished in paperback under the auspices of Beacon Press in Boston, but the more substantial second volume remained inaccessible and was a collector’s item for decades. I myself had a standing order with Blackwell’s from 1967, but it was at the end of a long list and eventually after much persuasion I received personal permission to make my own photocopy of the work. At long last in 1979 both volumes were reissued in matching format, exact and uncorrected reprints of the original, and they are now available in Australia**. It must be said at once that it is twenty years too late. Virtually every major statement made by Tarn has been critically examined over the last two and a half decades and in almost every case rejected. His work on Alexander is now a historical curiosity, valuable as a document illustrating his own emotional and intellectual make-up but practically worthless as a serious history of the Macedonian conqueror. As will be seen, Tarn’s attitudes and methods are interesting in their own right, but they are not interesting enough to justify the outrageous and exorbitant price that is demanded of the Australian market. Hard pressed school librarians would make a far better investment by acquiring a range of more recent publications.
    [Show full text]
  • 'How the Corpse of a Most Mighty King…' the Use of the Death and Burial of the English Monarch
    1 Doctoral Dissertation ‘How the Corpse of a Most Mighty King…’ The Use of the Death and Burial of the English Monarch (From Edward to Henry I) by James Plumtree Supervisors: Gábor Klaniczay, Gerhard Jaritz Submitted to the Medieval Studies Department and the Doctoral School of History Central European University, Budapest in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy CEU eTD Collection Budapest 2014 2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ 3 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 1. ‘JOYFULLY TAKEN UP TO LIVE WITH GOD’ THE ALTERED PASSING OF EDWARD .......................................................................... 13 1. 1. The King’s Two Deaths in MS C and the Vita Ædwardi Regis .......................... 14 1. 2. Dead Ends: Sulcard’s Prologus and the Bayeux Tapestry .................................. 24 1. 3. The Smell of Sanctity, A Whiff of Fraud: Osbert and the 1102 Translation ....... 31 1. 4. The Death in Histories: Orderic, Malmesbury, and Huntingdon ......................... 36 1. 5. ‘We Have Him’: The King’s Cadaver at Westminster .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Abbey
    INTRODUCTION TO THIS SPECIAL EDITION ON READING ABBEY Reading Abbey: Intellectual and Artistic Culture in an International Context Lindy Grant University of Reading Reading Abbey rarely receives the attention it deserves.1 Its physical remains are a battered shell, in what until fairly recently was an unsympathetic urban environment, and it simply cannot compete with the cluttered grandeur of Westminster, or the magnificence and completeness of Canterbury, or the romantic ruin of so many of our great Cistercian abbeys. But it should attract our attention, for when it was founded, Reading was one of the most important religious institutions in northern Europe. It should be studied and understood within a broad European context. This is what the papers in this collection aim to do. Reading Abbey had close connections with the Anglo-Norman and Angevin kings. It was founded by Henry I around 1121 as his mausoleum. Henry died in Normandy, but his body was brought back for burial at Reading, as he intended, and was buried before the high altar in January 1136. When Henry founded the abbey, he was still mourning the death of his revered wife, Matilda of Scotland, and of his son and heir, William Adelin, who had drowned in the White Ship disaster. He had just remarried – to Adeliza of Louvain, in the hope that this would bring him a new heir. So from the start, Reading Abbey was intimately linked to death, birth and commemoration of the English royal family.2 The abbey was dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary, the intercessor for mankind at death.
    [Show full text]
  • Style of Architecture, Consisting of Hard Backed Bricks, Molded in Such a Shape As to Fit Regularly to Each Other”
    Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.10, No.3, 2020, 87-111 ISSN: 1792-9040 (print version), 1792-9660 (online) Scientific Press International Limited Babylon in a New Era: The Chaldean and Achaemenid Empires (330-612 BC) Nasrat Adamo1 and Nadhir Al-Ansari2 Abstract The new rise of Babylon is reported and its domination of the old world is described; when two dynasties ruled Neo- Babylonia from 612 BC to 330 BC. First, the Chaldeans had taken over from the Assyrians whom they had defeated and established their empire, which lasted for 77 years followed by the Achaemenid dynasty, which was to rule Babylonia for the remaining period as part of their empire. Out of the 77 years of the Chaldean period king, Nebuchadnezzar II ruled for 43 years, which were full of military achievements and construction works and organization. Apart from extending the borders of the empire, he had managed to construct large-scale hydraulic works which were intended for irrigation, navigation and even for defensive purposes. He excavated, re-excavated, and maintained four large feeder canals taking off from the Euphrates, which served the agriculture in the whole area between the Euphrates and the Tigris in the middle and lower Euphrates regions. Moreover, he was concerned with flood protection and so he constructed one large reservoir near Sippar at 60 km north of Babylon to be filled by the Euphrates excess water during floods and to be returned back to the river during low flow season in summer. His works involved river training projects, so he trained the Euphrates by digging artificial meanders to reduce the velocity of the flow and improving navigation and allow the construction of the canal intakes in a less turbulent flows.
    [Show full text]