DOCSLIB.ORG

OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Wednesday, 20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Wednesday, 20 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 20 November 2019 1839 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Wednesday, 20 November 2019 The Council met at Eleven o'clock MEMBERS PRESENT: THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE ANDREW LEUNG KWAN-YUEN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE JAMES TO KUN-SUN THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG THE HONOURABLE ABRAHAM SHEK LAI-HIM, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TOMMY CHEUNG YU-YAN, G.B.S., J.P. PROF THE HONOURABLE JOSEPH LEE KOK-LONG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE JEFFREY LAM KIN-FUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG TING-KWONG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE STARRY LEE WAI-KING, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN HAK-KAN, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN KIN-POR, G.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE PRISCILLA LEUNG MEI-FUN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-KIN, S.B.S., J.P. 1840 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 20 November 2019 THE HONOURABLE MRS REGINA IP LAU SUK-YEE, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE PAUL TSE WAI-CHUN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE CLAUDIA MO THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL TIEN PUK-SUN, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE STEVEN HO CHUN-YIN, B.B.S. THE HONOURABLE FRANKIE YICK CHI-MING, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WU CHI-WAI, M.H. THE HONOURABLE YIU SI-WING, B.B.S. THE HONOURABLE MA FUNG-KWOK, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHARLES PETER MOK, J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN CHI-CHUEN THE HONOURABLE CHAN HAN-PAN, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG CHE-CHEUNG, S.B.S., M.H., J.P. THE HONOURABLE KENNETH LEUNG THE HONOURABLE ALICE MAK MEI-KUEN, B.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE KWOK KA-KI THE HONOURABLE DENNIS KWOK WING-HANG THE HONOURABLE CHRISTOPHER CHEUNG WAH-FUNG, S.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE HELENA WONG PIK-WAN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 20 November 2019 1841 THE HONOURABLE IP KIN-YUEN THE HONOURABLE MARTIN LIAO CHEUNG-KONG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE POON SIU-PING, B.B.S., M.H. DR THE HONOURABLE CHIANG LAI-WAN, S.B.S., J.P. IR DR THE HONOURABLE LO WAI-KWOK, S.B.S., M.H., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHUNG KWOK-PAN THE HONOURABLE ALVIN YEUNG THE HONOURABLE ANDREW WAN SIU-KIN THE HONOURABLE CHU HOI-DICK THE HONOURABLE JIMMY NG WING-KA, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE JUNIUS HO KWAN-YIU, J.P. THE HONOURABLE HO KAI-MING THE HONOURABLE LAM CHEUK-TING THE HONOURABLE HOLDEN CHOW HO-DING THE HONOURABLE SHIU KA-CHUN THE HONOURABLE WILSON OR CHONG-SHING, M.H. THE HONOURABLE YUNG HOI-YAN, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE PIERRE CHAN THE HONOURABLE CHAN CHUN-YING, J.P. 1842 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 20 November 2019 THE HONOURABLE TANYA CHAN THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG KWOK-KWAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE HUI CHI-FUNG THE HONOURABLE LUK CHUNG-HUNG, J.P. THE HONOURABLE LAU KWOK-FAN, M.H. THE HONOURABLE KENNETH LAU IP-KEUNG, B.B.S., M.H., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE CHENG CHUNG-TAI THE HONOURABLE KWONG CHUN-YU THE HONOURABLE JEREMY TAM MAN-HO THE HONOURABLE GARY FAN KWOK-WAI THE HONOURABLE AU NOK-HIN THE HONOURABLE VINCENT CHENG WING-SHUN, M.H., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TONY TSE WAI-CHUEN, B.B.S. THE HONOURABLE CHAN HOI-YAN MEMBERS ABSENT: THE HONOURABLE KWOK WAI-KEUNG, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE FERNANDO CHEUNG CHIU-HUNG THE HONOURABLE ELIZABETH QUAT, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE SHIU KA-FAI, J.P. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 20 November 2019 1843 PUBLIC OFFICERS ATTENDING: THE HONOURABLE WONG KAM-SING, G.B.S., J.P. SECRETARY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT THE HONOURABLE JOHN LEE KA-CHIU, S.B.S., P.D.S.M., J.P. SECRETARY FOR SECURITY THE HONOURABLE FRANK CHAN FAN, J.P. SECRETARY FOR TRANSPORT AND HOUSING PROF THE HONOURABLE SOPHIA CHAN SIU-CHEE, J.P. SECRETARY FOR FOOD AND HEALTH THE HONOURABLE EDWARD YAU TANG-WAH, G.B.S., J.P. SECRETARY FOR COMMERCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THE HONOURABLE PATRICK NIP TAK-KUEN, J.P. SECRETARY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND MAINLAND AFFAIRS MR ANDY CHAN SHUI-FU, J.P. UNDER SECRETARY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND MAINLAND AFFAIRS CLERKS IN ATTENDANCE: MR KENNETH CHEN WEI-ON, S.B.S., SECRETARY GENERAL MISS ODELIA LEUNG HING-YEE, DEPUTY SECRETARY GENERAL MS DORA WAI, ASSISTANT SECRETARY GENERAL 1844 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 20 November 2019 PRESIDENT (in Cantonese): Will the Clerk please ring the bell to summon Members to the Chamber. (After the summoning bell had been rung, a number of Members entered the Chamber) PAPERS TO BE LAID ON THE TABLE OF THE COUNCIL The following papers were laid on the table under Rule 21(2) of the Rules of Procedure: Immigration Service Welfare Fund Report on the administration of the Fund, Financial statements and Report of the Director of Audit for the year ended 31 March 2019 Secretary for Home Affairs Incorporated Financial statements and Report of the Director of Audit for the year ended 31 March 2019 Sir Edward Youde Memorial Fund Report of the Board of Trustees, Financial statements and Report of the Director of Audit for the Period 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 Competition Commission Annual Report 2018/2019 (including Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report) ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS PRESIDENT (in Cantonese): Questions. First question. Mr HUI Chi-fung, please ask your question. (Dr KWOK Ka-ki indicated his wish to raise a point of order) PRESIDENT (in Cantonese): Dr KWOK Ka-ki, what is your point of order? LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 20 November 2019 1845 DR KWOK KA-KI (in Cantonese): President, I raised an urgent question earlier on the situation of the Police having fired nearly 10 000 rounds of tear gas as of that time. I have noticed that President has, time and again, ignored completely these issues of great concern to the people of Hong Kong. I would like to ask the President: How should we view the work and functions of the Legislative Council? What is under discussion is that parents, teachers and even students across Hong Kong are exposed to tear gas, or even dioxins, in every community, but the President has not once permitted urgent questions to be asked on this issue. PRESIDENT (in Cantonese): I have made rulings in writing on several applications for asking urgent questions submitted previously. In fact, this Council has a very rigorous mechanism for handling requests for asking urgent questions. The most important consideration is whether the asking of a particular question will become meaningless if it were not asked at the current meeting. The Legislative Council has a plurality of channels and platforms for Members to ask these questions. Members may do so by waiting for their turn to ask questions in the oral question session of this Council's meetings or at committee meetings, and everything will be handled according to the established mechanism. Dr KWOK Ka-ki, please sit down. Mr HUI Chi-fung, please ask your question. Inquiring into the movement of opposition to the proposed legislative amendments 1. MR HUI CHI-FUNG (in Cantonese): Thank you, Mr LEUNG. The "Anti-extradition to China" movement has not subsided since its eruption in June this year. It has been reported that as revealed by the findings of a number of public opinion surveys, more than 70% of members of the public support the appointment of a commission of inquiry by the Government under the Commissions of Inquiry Ordinance to inquire into issues relating to the movement. However, the Government has all along merely indicated that the 1846 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 20 November 2019 matters relating to the various large-scale public events and the operations conducted by the Police have been referred to the Independent Police Complaints Council ("IPCC") for examination, and that IPCC would submit a report together with improvement recommendations. As all members of IPCC are appointed by the Chief Executive, some members of the public consider that IPCC has a pro-government stance and they have little confidence in the independence of IPCC's work. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council: (1) among the complaints received by the Complaints Against Police Office in each of the past three years, of the number and percentage of substantiated cases, and among the complaints involving accusations of assault, the number and percentage of substantiated cases; (2) given that IPCC is not empowered to summon witnesses and carry out investigations, how the Government ensures that the report to be published by IPCC in future will provide a comprehensive and an objective analysis of the causes of the "Anti-extradition to China" movement, and that IPCC will reach an objective and an impartial conclusion about whether or not police officers have used force excessively; and (3) in respect of conducting inquiries into issues relating to the "Anti-extradition to China" movement, whether it has assessed the merits and demerits for the relevant work to be taken up by an independent commission of inquiry or by IPCC, whose members' independence has been called into question; if so, of the outcome? (Mr Steven HO indicated his wish to raise a point of order) PRESIDENT (in Cantonese): Mr Steven HO, what is your point of order? MR STEVEN HO (in Cantonese): President, I see that Mr HUI Chi-fung has not read out the exact wording of the draft. He has done some little tricks. I would like the President to make a ruling. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 20 November 2019 1847 PRESIDENT (in Cantonese): Mr HUI Chi-fung, please read out the main question again.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mediation Conference 2014 “Mediate First for a Win-Win Solution” Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, Meeting Room N101 20 – 21 March 2014
    Mediation Conference 2014 “Mediate First for a Win-Win Solution” Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, Meeting Room N101 20 – 21 March 2014 Conference Programme Thursday, 20 March 2014 (Conducted in English) 8:30 - 9:00 Registration Welcome Addresses 9:00 - 9:30 The Honourable Chief Justice Geoffrey MA Tao-li, GBM Chief Justice, The Court of Final Appeal, Judiciary The Honourable Mr Rimsky YUEN, SC, JP Secretary for Justice, Government of HKSAR Chairperson of the Steering Committee on Mediation 9:30 - 10:00 Keynote Speech The Right Honourable The Lord Woolf of Barnes Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales 10:00 - 10:20 Question and Answer Session with Keynote Speaker The Right Honourable The Lord Woolf of Barnes Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales Moderator: Prof. Christopher TO Executive Director of Construction Industry Council, Council Member of Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, Member of the Steering Committee on Mediation and the Accreditation Sub-committee 10:20 - 10:25 Première Broadcast of the 2nd Announcement in Public Interest “Mediate First for a Win-Win Solution” 10:25 - 10:45 Refreshment Break 10:45 - 12:15 Plenary Session: The Global Trend in Mediation Mediation is increasingly popular around the world as an effective alternative dispute resolution method in view of its advantages. A detailed review of the latest development of mediation in Australasia, United Kingdom, Europe, North America, China and the Asia Pacific Region. 1 Moderator: Mr. Danny McFadden Managing Director of CEDR Asia Pacific Speakers: The Honourable Madam Justice P A BERGIN Chief Judge in Equity, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Hong Kong
    CHAPTER 6 HONG KONG Key Findings • The Hong Kong government’s proposal of a bill that would allow for extraditions to mainland China sparked the territory’s worst political crisis since its 1997 handover to the Mainland from the United Kingdom. China’s encroachment on Hong Kong’s auton- omy and its suppression of prodemocracy voices in recent years have fueled opposition, with many protesters now seeing the current demonstrations as Hong Kong’s last stand to preserve its freedoms. Protesters voiced five demands: (1) formal with- drawal of the bill; (2) establishing an independent inquiry into police brutality; (3) removing the designation of the protests as “riots;” (4) releasing all those arrested during the movement; and (5) instituting universal suffrage. • After unprecedented protests against the extradition bill, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam suspended the measure in June 2019, dealing a blow to Beijing which had backed the legislation and crippling her political agenda. Her promise in September to formally withdraw the bill came after months of protests and escalation by the Hong Kong police seeking to quell demonstrations. The Hong Kong police used increasingly aggressive tactics against protesters, resulting in calls for an independent inquiry into police abuses. • Despite millions of demonstrators—spanning ages, religions, and professions—taking to the streets in largely peaceful pro- test, the Lam Administration continues to align itself with Bei- jing and only conceded to one of the five protester demands. In an attempt to conflate the bolder actions of a few with the largely peaceful protests, Chinese officials have compared the movement to “terrorism” and a “color revolution,” and have im- plicitly threatened to deploy its security forces from outside Hong Kong to suppress the demonstrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong: in the Name of National Security Human Rights Violations Related to the Implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law
    HONG KONG: IN THE NAME OF NATIONAL SECURITY HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RELATED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HONG KONG NATIONAL SECURITY LAW Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 10 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2021 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2021 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 17/4197/2021 June 2021 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 1. BACKGROUND 3 2. ACTS AUTHORITIES CLAIM TO BE ‘ENDANGERING NATIONAL SECURITY’ 5 EXERCISING THE RIGHT OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY 5 EXERCISING THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION 7 EXERCISING THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION 9 ENGAGING IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ADVOCACY 10 3. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ENABLED BY THE NSL 12 STRINGENT THRESHOLD FOR BAIL AND PROLONGED PERIOD OF PRETRIAL DETENTION 13 FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT 15 RETROACTIVITY 16 SPECIALLY APPOINTED JUDGES 16 RIGHT TO LEGAL COUNSEL 17 ADEQUATE TIME AND FACILITIES TO PREPARE A DEFENCE 17 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Thanks for Your Support
    Thanks for Your Support The Academy of Law acknowledges the generous contribution of everyone who was involved in the presentation of the training programme for the period between 2 September 2008 and 31 December 2009. The Academy extends a special note of thanks to the following judges, solicitors, barristers, foreign lawyers and prominent members of society who volunteered their time to make the programme such a success: A y Registrar Queeny Au-Yeung, High Court B y Peter Barnes, Partner, Barnes & Daly y Philip Beh, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong y Geoffrey Booth, Partner, Haldanes y Judge Kevin Browne, Judge of the District Court y John Budge, Partner, Wilkinson & Grist y Patrick Burke, Partner, Burke & Co C y Patrick Cavanagh, Director of Commercial Programmes, Dispute Resolution Centre, Bond University y His Honour Judge Bruno Chan, Family Court y Mary Chan, Consultant, Ho & Ip y Her Honour Judge Mimmie Chan, District Court y Stephen Chan, Partner, BDO Limited y Felix W.H. Chan, Associate Professor, Associate Dean, Department of Professional Legal Education, The University of Hong Kong y Wai-sum Chan, Professor, Department of Finance, Chinese University of Hong Kong y Julia Charlton, Partner, Charltons y Allen Che, Partner, Wong, Hui, & Co y Cheng Wui Kei Roy, Director, ISE Consultants Limited y Amelia Cheung, Partner, Amelia Cheung & Co y David Cheung, Partner, Yuen K H & David Cheung y Melissa Chim, Solicitor, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert y Choi Wai Fan, RBS Coutts Bank Ltd y Chow Wing Hang,
    [Show full text]
  • Oct. 29Th – Nov. 4 Page 1
    Oct. 29th – Nov. 4 Page 1 Sinclair Has a Pool? Pg. 2 Logan Turner Fund Pg. 3 Puppies on Campus Pg. 4 Luna Gifts Pg. 9 The Volume 43, Issue 10 Oct. 29th – Nov. 4th www.sinclairclarion.com THE OFFICIAL STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF SINCLAIR COLLEGE FREE Page 2 Tartan News Oct. 29th – Nov. 4 Oct. 29th – Nov. 4 Harvest Fest Promises Fall Fun for Students the event will be held in the Building 8 their skills with free face painting. a waiver. Workers from the Tutoring Gym. Sinclair’s social media account will “The goal of the event is to provide and Learning Center will be dressed as provide updates. a fun, engaging activity for students as characters from “The Wizard of Oz” while The event is a long-standing and enjoyed we head towards the final few weeks of guiding wanderers on their way. tradition at Sinclair, remaining one of the the semester,” Chaput said. “It is a great “Participating in events, such as Harvest most attended events of the year. opportunity for students to participate in Fest, is a great way to meet some of “Harvest Fest is a tradition at Sinclair a lot of different games and get to know the people who are here to support you and archival records indicate that the event one another outside of the classroom! I throughout your time at Sinclair and just has historical significance dating back to think we have something for everyone this have fun in between classes,” Chaput said. before the current location of the Dayton year and really hope to see a lot of people “We hope to see you there!” Campus was built,” Tristan Chaput, participating.” Coordinator of Student Engagement, said.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong's National Security
    FEBRUARY 2021 HONG KONG’S NATIONAL SECURITY LAW: A Human Rights and Rule of Law Analysis by Lydia Wong and Thomas E. Kellogg THE NATIONAL SECURITY LAW constitutes one of the greatest threats to human rights and the rule of law in Hong Kong since the 1997 handover. This report was researched and written by Lydia Wong (alias, [email protected]), research fellow, Georgetown Center for Asian Law; and Thomas E. Kellogg ([email protected]), executive director, Georgetown Center for Asian Law, and adjunct professor of law, Georgetown University Law Center. (Ms. Wong, a scholar from the PRC, decided to use an alias due to political security concerns.) The authors would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments on the draft report. We also thank Prof. James V. Feinerman for both his substantive inputs on the report, and for his longstanding leadership and guidance of the Center for Asian Law. We would also like to thank the Hong Kongers we interviewed for this report, for sharing their insights on the situation in Hong Kong. All photographs by CLOUD, a Hong Kong-based photographer. Thanks to Kelsey Harrison for administrative and publishing support. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i The National Security Law: Undermining the Basic Law, Threatening Human Rights iii Implementation of the NSL iv I INTRODUCTION 1 THE HONG KONG NATIONAL SECURITY LAW: II A HUMAN RIGHTS AND RULE OF LAW ANALYSIS 6 The NSL: Infringing LegCo Authority 9 New NSL Structures: A Threat to Hong Kong’s Autonomy 12 The NSL and the Courts: Judicial
    [Show full text]
  • JORC Report 1977-2002
    司法人員 推薦委員會報告 Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission Report 1997 - 2002 香港特別行政區政府新聞處設計 政府物流服務署印 （採用環保油墨及取材自可再生林木的紙張印製） Designed by the Information Services Department Printed by the Government Logistics Department Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (Printed with environmentally friendly ink on paper made from woodpulp derived from renewable forests) 目錄 Contents 前言 Foreword ................................................................................................................................... i 章 頁 Chapter Pages 1 司法人員推薦委員會 The Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission ....................................................... 1 –7 2 委員會的工作 Work of the Commission .................................................................................................. 8 – 14 3 終審法院首席法官及終審法院 Chief Justice and the Court of Final Appeal .................................................................... 15 – 21 4 高等法院 High Court ........................................................................................................................ 22 – 31 5 區域法院及土地審裁處 District Court and Lands Tribunal .................................................................................... 32 – 37 6 裁判法院、審裁處及死因裁判法庭 Magistrates' Courts, Tribunals and Coroner's Court ........................................................ 38 – 45 附錄 Appendix 1 2001年7月1日至2003年6月30日任期內司法人員推薦委員會主席及委員的簡歷 .............. 46 – 49 Bio-data of the Chairman and Members of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission for the term 1 July 2001 to 30
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Protests
    Country Policy and Information Note China: Hong Kong protests Version 1.0 February 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the basis of claim section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment on whether, in general: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • Claims are likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts. Country of origin information The country information in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • ​In the Matter of University of Toronto Career & Co-Curricular Learning
    In the Matter of University of Toronto Career & Co-Curricular Learning Network ​ Job ID: 164851 Hong Kong Police Force - Police Inspectors 2 June 2020 JOINT COMPLAINT TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSPERSON IN THE MATTER OF CAREER & CO-CURRICULAR LEARNING NETWORK JOB ID: 164851 HONG KONG POLICE FORCE - POLICE INSPECTORS (WITH REQUEST FOR INTERIM MEASURES) Submitted by: (The Complainants) International Human Rights Program at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law; and University of Toronto Hong Kong Extradition Law Awareness Group [email protected] Legal Representative of the Complainants: Vincent Wan Shun Wong Barrister & Solicitor LSO Number: 65767J [email protected] Submitted to: (The Respondents) Career Exploration & Education University of Toronto St. George c/o Lily Abediny, Assistant Director [email protected] Events and Employment Services University of Toronto Mississauga c/o Vanisa Dimitrova, Coordinator [email protected] Employer Engagement University of Toronto Scarborough c/o Adrian Berg, Coordinator [email protected] INTRODUCTION 1. The Complainants, the International Human Rights Program at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law (IHRP) and the University of Toronto Hong Kong Extradition Law Awareness Group (UTHKELAG) are jointly filing a formal complaint against the Respondents, the University of Toronto Tri-Campus Career Services, specifically Career Exploration & Education at University of Toronto St. George (UTSG), Events and Employment Services at University of Toronto Mississauga (UTM), and Employer Engagement at University of Toronto Scarborough (UTSC). 2. The Complainants respectfully submit that certain job postings on the University’s Career & Co-Curricular Learning Network (CLNx) violate University Employer Guidelines1 that the Respondents are bound to adhere to.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atypical Bilingual Courtroom an Exploratory Study of the Interactional Dynamics in Interpreter-Mediated Trials
    DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The atypical bilingual courtroom an exploratory study of the interactional dynamics in interpreter-mediated trials in Hong Kong Eva Ng 2013 Aston University Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions. If you have discovered material in AURA which is unlawful e.g. breaches copyright, (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please read our Takedown Policy and contact the service immediately THE ATYPICAL BILINGUAL COURTROOM: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF THE INTERACTIONAL DYNAMICS IN INTERPRETER-MEDIATED TRIALS IN HONG KONG EVA NGA SHAN NG A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ASTON UNIVERSITY January 2013 © Eva Nga Shan Ng, 2013 Eva Nga Shan Ng asserts her moral right to be identified as the author of this thesis This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. 1 ASTON UNIVERSITY THE ATYPICAL BILINGUAL COURTROOM: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF THE INTERACTIONAL DYNAMICS IN INTERPRETER-MEDIATED TRIALS IN HONG KONG Eva Nga Shan Ng Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Thesis Summary: This study investigates the communication process in the atypical bilingual Hong Kong courtroom, where, unlike in most other jurisdictions, interpreting services are routinely provided for the linguistic majority instead of the linguistic minority and the interpreter usually has to work with court actors who share his/her bilingual knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong: the Rise and Fall of “One Country, Two Systems”
    Hong Kong: The Rise and Fall of “One Country, Two Systems” William H. Overholt December 2019 Hong Kong: The Rise and Fall of “One Country, Two Systems” William H. Overholt December 2019 hong kong: The Rise and Fall of “One Country, Two Systems” about the author William Overholt is a Senior Research Fellow, focusing on Chinese/Asian economic development, political development, and geopolitics with the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at Harvard Kennedy School. During 2013–15 he also served as President of the Fung Global Institute in Hong Kong. His career includes 16 years doing policy research at think tanks and 21 years running investment bank research teams. Previously he held the Asia Policy Distinguished Research Chair at RAND’s California headquarters and was Director of the Center for Asia Pacific Policy; concurrently he was Visiting Professor at Shanghai Jiaodong University and, earlier, Distinguished Visiting Professor at Korea’s Yonsei University. During 21 years in invest- ment banking, he served as Head of Strategy and Economics at Nomura’s regional headquarters in Hong Kong from 1998 to 2001, and as Managing Director and Head of Research at Bank Boston’s regional headquarters in Singapore. For Bankers Trust, he ran a country risk team in New York from 1980 to 1984, then was regional strategist and Asia research head based in Hong Kong from 1985 to 1998. At Hudson Institute from 1971 to 1979, Dr. Overholt directed planning studies for the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of State, National Security Council, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Council on International Economic Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third UNCITRAL Asia Pacific Judicial Summit 2019 Judicial
    The Third UNCITRAL Asia Pacific Judicial Summit 2019 Judicial Roundtable Mediation in Hong Kong from the Perspective of the Judiciary By The Hon Mr Justice Barnabas Fung 5 November 2019 Development of Mediation in Hong Kong Mediation as a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has been practiced in Hong Kong for a considerable period of time, and has gained popularity in recent decades in many contexts, such as the construction and commercial sectors as well as the community. Early endeavours by the Judiciary were in matrimonial and related disputes in the Family Court in 2000. The conduct of mediation has always been voluntary, facilitative, and conducted by private practitioners and not judicial officers. The Mediation Co-ordinator’s Office was set up in the Family Court, providing information sessions, pre-mediation consultations as well as mediator referral services. A pilot scheme was also put in place to subsidize the costs of mediation in the initial stages. The success of mediation in family matters was demonstrable and had paved the way for wider use of mediation in other court proceedings. In January 2007, a Judiciary Working Party was set up to consider how mediation could be implemented in different levels of court and tribunals in Hong Kong as an advent to the introduction of mediation as an integral part of the civil procedure under the Civil Justice Reform. Membership of the Working Party included judges, representatives of the Department of Justice, Legal Aid Department, branches of the legal profession as well as practicing mediators. It was and is still the platform where initiatives and policies are deliberated and steered, where pilot schemes and permanent measures are implemented in the Judiciary.
    [Show full text]