Jaypee Infratech Limited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jaypee Infratech Limited 31 August, 2019 Jaypee Infratech Limited List of Home buyers who have not submitted their claim Please note that these home buyers are not part of CoC as we have not received the claim forms within prescribed period. However, they continue to remain allottees as per the books of the corporate debtor. S.No Unit Number Status of Unit Name of Customer S.No Unit Number Status of Unit Name of Customer 1 AM0A101A02 Active Vidya Sagar Dixit 1328 KM00241502 Active Bharti Mishra 2 AM0A102A06 Active Jogindro Devi Sharma 1329 KM00241804 Active Grip Software Private 3 AM0A102B01 Active Rahul Verma 1330 KM00241902 Active Praveen Kumar Jain 4 AM0A102B06 Active Sonali Seth 1331 KM00250604 Active Sabah Imam 5 AM0A103A02 Active Mani Bhushan Kishor 1332 KM00250803 Active Dinesh Kumar Sethi 6 AM0A103A06 Active Lalit Kumar Srivastava 1333 KM00260201 Active Jamal Akhtar Aziz 7 AM0A103B02 Active Sunil Kataria 1334 KM00260203 Active Vimla Gupta 8 AM0A103B03 Active Gopal Singh 1335 KM00260403 Active Sakshi Roy 9 AM0A103B05 Active Jitender Singh 1336 KM00260404 Active Kanika Sharma 10 AM0A104A01 Active Faisal Ameen 1337 KM00260601 Active Vinay Bindal 11 AM0A104B02 Active Sunil Talwar 1338 KM00260703 Active Sampann Neb 12 AM0A104B04 Active Saurabh Pratap Singh 1339 KM00260903 Active Anurag Bhardwaj 13 AM0A105A04 Inactive Deepak Ranjan Gogoi 1340 KM00261804 Active Rajeshwar Dutt Sharma 14 AM0A105B06 Active Ashish Kumar 1341 KM00262003 Active Maheshwar Dutt Sharma 15 AM0A106A07 Active Nimesh Kumar 1342 KM00280102 OOP Kartar Chand Nandolia 16 AM0A106B04 Active Gopal Swaroop Bajpai 1343 KM00280703 OOP Tej Singh 17 AM0A107A05 Active Manoj Kumar Prasad 1344 KM00281205 OOP Shashi Khandelwal 18 AM0A108A05 Active Ashok Kumar Arora 1345 KM00281701 OOP Sundeep Kaura Huf 19 AM0A108B01 Active Satyendra Mishra 1346 KM00290105 OOP Vikas Agarwal 20 AM0A109A02 Active Ashutosh Sharma 1347 KM00290502 OOP T.R. Vivek 21 AM0A109A05 Active Neeti Bhatnagar 1348 KM00290705 OOP Rachna Sharma 22 AM0A109A08 Active Preeti Singh 1349 KM00290806 OOP Neelu A Vishwakarma 23 AM0A109B02 Active Reema Gill 1350 KM00291105 OOP Ashish Prakash Manwar 24 AM0A109B03 Active Poonam Devi 1351 KM00291204 OOP Sunetrika Mookherjee 25 AM0A110B07 Active Anita Sharma 1352 KM00291504 OOP Monis Iqbal 26 AM0A111A04 Active Sunita Garg 1353 KM00300208 OOP Mukesh Kumar Sharma 27 AM0A111B03 Active Sajal Jain 1354 KM00300306 OOP Nikita Chadha 28 AM0A112B02 Active Anjani Kumar 1355 KM00300705 OOP Mohd. Salman Waris 29 AM0A112B05 Active Vipin Kumar 1356 KM00300801 OOP Rajan Mohan 30 AM0A114A02 Active Bhawna Dudeja 1357 KM00300903 OOP Arun Kumar Kejriwal 31 AM0A114A03 Active Mohd Rizwan Siddiqui 1358 KM00300908 OOP Govinda Murari Mishra 32 AM0A114A06 Active Bhupinder Singh Saini 1359 KM00301008 OOP Anand Kumar Gupta 33 AM0A114B02 Active Rajesh Mani 1360 KM00301203 OOP Anu Gupta 34 AM0A114B04 Active Hari Chandra Prasad 1361 KM00301206 OOP Dilip Kumar Sarma 35 AM0A114B07 Active Basanti Kumari 1362 KM00301402 OOP Neha Bhatnagar 36 AM0A115A01 Active Mohd Mushir Ahmed 1363 KM00301706 OOP Ramesh Chand Aggarwal 37 AM0A115A03 Active Danita Kaur 1364 KM00310003 OOP Ajaypal Singh Somvanshi 38 AM0A115A05 Active Manish Kathuria 1365 KM00310101 OOP Vivek Narang 39 AM0A115A08 Inactive Mohammad Khaliq Khan 1366 KM00310301 OOP Rituparna Chatterjee 40 AM0A115B02 Active Sachiv Batra 1367 KM00310903 OOP Raghavendra Naik 41 AM0A115B05 Active Tosif Ahmed 1368 KM00311103 OOP Kaviraj Singh 42 AM0A115B07 Inactive Gufarana . 1369 KM00311206 OOP Nishant Bhushan Prasad 43 AM0A115B08 Active Madhur Adlakha 1370 KM00311507 OOP Yogesh Kumar Tyagi 44 AM0A201A08 Active Ashok . 1371 KM00311702 OOP Himanshu Sudhir Nagar 45 AM0A201B01 Active Seema . 1372 KM00311704 OOP Investors Clinic Infratech Pvt 46 AM0A201B02 Active Naveen Gupta 1373 KM00311705 OOP Dhiraj Sarin 47 AM0A202A06 Active Rahul Chawla 1374 KM00320601 OOP Anshu Khanna 48 AM0A202A07 Active Naval Batra 1375 KM00320606 OOP Ajay Pandita 49 AM0A202B04 Active Priya Vajpayee 1376 KM00320908 OOP Pradeep Kumar 50 AM0A202B06 Active Neeraj Kumar 1377 KM00321001 OOP Amit Kumar Singh 51 AM0A202B07 Active K S Bhatnagar 1378 KM00321102 OOP Nona Walia 52 AM0A203B03 Inactive Gopal Joshi 1379 KM00321105 OOP Kamini Sinha 53 AM0A203B04 Active Meenu Saxena 1380 KM00321508 OOP Prabhat Aggarwal 54 AM0A203B08 Active Veena Juneja 1381 KM00321705 OOP Abhishek Mishra 55 AM0A204B02 Active Mithu Pandey 1382 KM00330002 OOP Manish Puri 56 AM0A204B04 Active Sanjeev Bansal 1383 KM00330301 OOP Vijay Kumar 57 AM0A204B05 Active Mukesh Kumar Tripathi 1384 KM00330505 OOP Ashoke Ganguly 58 AM0A204B07 Active Inderjeet Kumar 1385 KM00330801 OOP Ashish Dilwali 59 AM0A204B08 Active Suresh Kumar 1386 KM00330804 OOP Sarang Shrawat 60 AM0A205A04 Active Kapil Kumar 1387 KM00331005 OOP Saroj Kumari 61 AM0A206B03 Active Nabil Ahmad 1388 KM00331407 OOP Sumita Ghosh 62 AM0A206B04 Active Dilip Kumar 1389 KM00331501 OOP Namra Kishore 63 AM0A207A02 Active Ashok Kumar Rajak 1390 KM00331505 OOP Sanjay Chowdhury 64 AM0A207B02 Active Dharm Singh Kushwah 1391 KM00331708 OOP Nirdosh Aggarwal 65 AM0A207B03 Active N K Mukul 1392 KM00340203 OOP Naveen Pandey 66 AM0A207B07 Active Pushpkaran Singh Babbar 1393 KM00340501 OOP Rahul Maheshwari 67 AM0A207B08 Active Rajesh Kumar 1394 KM00340603 OOP Kanchan Jayaswal Page 1 of 19 31 August, 2019 S.No Unit Number Status of Unit Name of Customer S.No Unit Number Status of Unit Name of Customer 68 AM0A208B05 Active Puneet Mahajan 1395 KM00341205 OOP Vineet Dhyani 69 AM0A208B08 Active Investors Clinic Infratech Pvt 1396 KM00341206 OOP Kanika Dhyani 70 AM0A209A05 Active Lokendra Kurrey 1397 KM00341207 OOP Ravi Chand Garg 71 AM0A209B07 Active Nirmala Sharma 1398 KM00341408 OOP Lily Gupta 72 AM0A210B04 Active Bhanu Pratap Sharma 1399 KM00341503 OOP Manisha Singh 73 AM0A210B06 Active Dixit Sood 1400 KM00350203 OOP Kamal Parvez 74 AM0A211A07 Active Pawan Kishore Singh 1401 KM00350502 OOP Suriender Singh Pahwa 75 AM0A212A04 Active Naresh Kumar 1402 KM00350508 OOP Mohammad Iftekhar 76 AM0A212B03 Active Investors Clinic Infratech Pvt 1403 KM00350701 OOP Rakesh Ramchand Sharma 77 AM0A214A01 Active Harsh Adlakha 1404 KM00351105 OOP Syed Faizan Zaidi 78 AM0A214A08 Active Puneet Malhotra 1405 KM00351203 OOP Avdhesh Tripathi 79 AM0A214B01 Active Kanika Chaudhary 1406 KM00351207 OOP Amit Kumar Singh 80 AM0A214B04 Active Samin Ahmed Chishti 1407 KM00351404 OOP Dildar Singh 81 AM0A214B06 Active Investors Clinic Infratech Pvt 1408 KM00351704 OOP Mohammed Zulfiqar Qureshi 82 AM0A215A02 Active T.S. Sawhney 1409 KM00351708 OOP Prerna Chakravarty 83 AM0B101A03 Active Balbir Kaur 1410 KM00360005 OOP Kharati Lal 84 AM0B101B02 Active Arun Bhargava 1411 KM00360006 OOP Shweta Sharma 85 AM0B101C02 Inactive Sudhir Kumar 1412 KM00360103 OOP Saroj Dani 86 AM0B102A01 Active Amit Jain 1413 KM00360108 OOP Sant Ram Verma 87 AM0B103A03 Active Neha Rani 1414 KM00360202 OOP Anil Kumar 88 AM0B103B01 Active Santosh Kumar Nirala 1415 KM00360205 OOP Farrukh Maqsood 89 AM0B103C02 Active Shambhu Nath 1416 KM00360302 OOP Vinod Kumar Sharma 90 AM0B104A01 Active Arvind Kumar Sharma 1417 KM00360303 OOP Padmini Raj Singh 91 AM0B104C01 Inactive Rajesh Chandra Sinha 1418 KM00360307 OOP Prabha Singhal 92 AM0B105A01 Active Satyakam Bhairma 1419 KM00360502 OOP Prem Singh 93 AM0B105C02 Active Ranjit Singh 1420 KM00360503 OOP Lalit Garg 94 AM0B105C03 Active Sunil Kumar Shukla 1421 KM00360505 OOP Istiyak Mohammad Khan 95 AM0B105C04 Active Sunil Devi 1422 KM00360705 OOP Sunita Kapoor 96 AM0B106A01 Active Rahul Jaiswal 1423 KM00360804 OOP Ramesh Rani 97 AM0B106A03 Active Vikas Kumar 1424 KM00360805 OOP Lokesh Pande 98 AM0B106B01 Active Anshu Singh 1425 KM00361107 OOP Vimlendu Jha 99 AM0B106D01 Active Poonam Bala 1426 KM00361108 OOP Rinku Chauhan 100 AM0B107C02 Inactive Satish Khanna 1427 KM00361404 OOP Ajay Panwar 101 AM0B107D03 Active Dinesh Kumar 1428 KM00361602 OOP Shikha Sharma 102 AM0B108C02 Active Hemant Kumar 1429 KM00361704 OOP Varun Mittra 103 AM0B108C04 Active Surveer Singh 1430 KM00370002 OOP Anjali Tandon 104 AM0B108D04 Active Suresh Chander Kathuria 1431 KM00370108 OOP Santosh Kumar 105 AM0B109A04 Active Vimla Gaur 1432 KM00370407 OOP Urmila Devi 106 AM0B109C04 Active Upika Gupta 1433 KM00370502 OOP Mohammad Kamran 107 AM0B112D01 Active Ali Raj T Raja 1434 KM00370508 OOP Amit Jain 108 AM0B202C01 Active Gaurav Aggarwal 1435 KM00370702 OOP Monika Jain 109 AM0B203A01 Active Raj Kumar 1436 KM00370805 OOP Rakesh Sharma 110 AM0B203B03 Inactive Raj Kumar Sharma 1437 KM00371102 OOP Kamal Bakshi 111 AM0B203C04 Active Neena Yadav 1438 KM00371605 OOP Anil Gupta 112 AM0B203D02 Active Abdul Haleem Khan 1439 KM00371607 OOP Anita Kokane 113 AM0B203D03 Active Lokesh Verma 1440 KM00371608 OOP Geetanjali Kumari 114 AM0B204C02 Active Prakash Kumar Pachauri 1441 KM00371705 OOP Kabul Tyagi 115 AM0B204D03 Active Raman Kumar Vijay 1442 KM00420005 OOP Manish Kumar Singh 116 AM0B204D04 Active Vineeta Tivari 1443 KM00420402 OOP Rohit Khushu 117 AM0B205A03 Active Zia Ur Rehman 1444 KM00420505 OOP Diwan Hannan Khan 118 AM0B205B02 Active Manoj Kumar Omprakash Gupta 1445 KM00420703 OOP Pankaj Sharma 119 AM0B205C03 Active Sunita Sah 1446 KM00420706 OOP Sudhir Kapur 120 AM0B205D01 Active Rama Trivedi 1447 KM00420707 OOP Amit Prasad Sharma 121 AM0B205D03 Active Archana Singh Sharma 1448 KM00420905 OOP Arif Ahmad Wani 122 AM0B206A01 Active Ashutosh Shah 1449 KM00421402 OOP Tanu Roy 123 AM0B206A02 Active Partha Pratim Hazarika 1450 KM00421701 OOP Pradhuman Singh Rathore 124 AM0B206B02 Active Ravindra Singh. 1451 KM00421704 OOP Lalit Kumar 125 AM0B206C02 Active Sunil Kumar 1452 KM00430005
Recommended publications
  • Supreme Court of India
    Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Re: Filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court. Against the sanctioned strength of 31 Judges, the Supreme Court of India is presently functioning with 25 Judges, leaving six clear vacancies. The Collegium met today to consider filling up of these vacancies and after extensive discussion and deliberations unanimously resolves to fill up, for the present, two of these vacancies. The Collegium discussed names of Chief Justices and senior puisne High Court Judges eligible for appointment as Judges of the Supreme Court. The Collegium considers that at present Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph, who hails from Kerala High Court and is currently functioning as Chief Justice of Uttarakhand High Court, is more deserving and suitable in all respects than other Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts for being appointed as Judges of the Supreme Court of India. While recommending the name of Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph, the Collegium has taken into consideration combined seniority on all-India basis of Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts, apart from their merit and integrity. Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph was appointed as a Judge of the Kerala High Court on 14th October, 2004 and was elevated as Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court on 31st July, 2014 and since Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) 2 then has been functioning there. He stands at Sl. No.45 in the combined seniority of High Court Judges on all-India basis. We have also considered the names of eminent members of the Bar.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Motion for Presenting an Address to the President of India for the Removal of Mr
    1 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR PRESENTING AN ADDRESS TO THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA FOR THE REMOVAL OF MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA, CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA, UNDER ARTICLE 217 READ WITH 124 (4) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA THIS HOUSE RESOLVES that an address be presented to the President of India for the removal of Mr. Justice Dipak Misra, from the office of Chief Justice of India, for his following acts of misbehaviour, detailed in the Explanatory Note annexed herewith: I. The facts and circumstances relating to the Prasad Education Trust case, show prima facie evidence suggesting that Chief Justice Dipak Misra may have been involved in the conspiracy of paying illegal gratification in the case, which at least warrants a thorough investigation. II. That the Chief Justice Dipak Misra dealt on the administrative as well as judicial side, with a writ petition which sought an investigation into a matter in which he too was likely to fall within the scope of investigation since he had presided over every bench which had dealt with this case and passed orders in the case of Prasad Education Trust, and thus violated the first principle of the Code of Conduct for judges. III. That the Chief Justice Dipak Misra appears to have antedated an administrative order dated 6th November 2017 which amounts to a serious act of forgery/fabrication. IV. That Chief Justice Dipak Misra acquired land while he was an advocate, by giving an affidavit that was found to be false and despite the orders of the ADM cancelling the allotment in 1985, surrendered the said land only in 2012 after he was elevated to the Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Index Launches S&P BSE Private Banks Index
    THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 Asia Index launches S&P BSE The International Women Entrepreneurs Sakshi Choudhary clinches Private Banks Index Summit 2018 gold medal at World Youth 5 September 2018 (International News) 5 September 2018 (International News) Boxing in Budapest The International Women Entrepreneurs 5 September 2018 ( Sports News) Asia Index Pvt Ltd, a joint Summit 2018 was inaugurated by the Vice venture between S&P Dow Jones President of Nepal Nanda Bahadur Pun in In boxing, Indices and BSE Ltd, announced Kathmandu, the capital of Nepal on former junior the launch of an index designed September 3, 2018. world champion to measure the performance of Nepal‘s Vice President emphasised upon empowering women boxer Sakshi private banks. in all areas including social, political and economic. The three- Choudhary day event is being organised by the South Asian Women added the youth The S&P BSE Private Banks Index is drawn from the Development Forum. It is expected to witness participation crown to her constituents of the S&P BSE Finance Index, the Asia's oldest from delegates belonging to 27 countries including China and cabinet in the 57- exchange said in a statement. the SAARC, ASEAN, EU, African and Arab countries. The kilogram Only common stocks classified as Banks by the BSE Sector Theme of the International Women Entrepreneurs Summit category, Classification model and that are not classified under the 2018: ‗Equality begins with Economic Empowerment‘ claiming the gold BSE scrip category as a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) are Objective of the Summit at the World Youth Boxing in Budapest.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Petition
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO._________OF 2020 (A WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) IN THE MATTER OF: POSITION OF PARTIES Madhu Purnima Kishwar D/o- Late Shri K L Kishwar VERSUS …..Petitioner 1. Union of India Contesting Through Home Secretary Respondent no. 1 North Block, Central Secretariat New Delhi. 2. Union of India Through Secretary Contesting Ministry of Law & Justice Respondent no. 2 Jaisalmer House New Delhi. 3. Supreme Court of India Through Secretary General Supreme Court of India. Contesting Tilak Marg, Respondent no. 3 New Delhi. A WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN WWW.LIVELAW.IN 2 NATURE OF MANDAMUS, APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION, FOR APPLICATION OF SECTION 8 OF THE LOPKAL ACT ON JUDGES OF SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURTS. To The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India And his companion Judges of the Supreme Court of India at New Delhi The humble Petition of the Petitioner above-named. MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the petitioner is filing the present Writ petition under article 32 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus, appropriate order or direction, for application of restrictions contained in Section 8 of the Lopkal Act on judges of Supreme Court of India and various high courts. 1A. That the instant writ petition in the nature of Public Interest is being filed under Article 32 against the State and its functionaries for protecting the independence of WWW.LIVELAW.IN 3 judiciary which is part of the basic structure of the Constitution of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Metoo in India: What's Next
    Joshi | #MeToo in India: What's Next #MeToo in India: What's Next Shareen Joshi Last October, India was swept by the winds of the #MeToo movement. The first move came from the Indian film industry, when Tanushree Dutta, a prominent Indian actress, accused Nana Patekar, an established actor and filmmaker, of sexual harassment on the set of a movie in 2008. Days later, journalist Priya Ramani accused M.J. Akbar, a leading government minister, of sexual harassment. These moves opened the floodgates for many other women working in the Indian film industry, media, government, private sector, and academia. The movement had some immediate impacts. Nana Patekar was removed from his latest movie, M.J. Akbar resigned, and a wave of other resignations and boycotts followed. Since then, however, the winds have calmed. Many of the accused have marshalled legal, financial, and government resources to protect themselves. Nana Patekar, who had denied the charges, issued a legal notice to Tanushree Dutta to withdraw her allegations. Dutta has also been accused of placing a “curse” on others who she named as enablers of her alleged abuse. M.J. Akbar has accused Priya Ramani of defamation. Actor Alok Nath, who is on trial for the alleged rape of writer-producer Vinta Nanda, will star in a new movie entitled #MainBhi (a Hindi translation of #MeToo), in which he will play a judge who takes a strong stand against sexual harassment in Indian society.1 The arrival of the #MeToo moment was not a huge surprise. India is one of the most gender unequal societies in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Tnpsc Bits National
    • • October – 21 TNPSC BITS ❖ Delhi Tourism in association with Government of Delhi, is organizing the second edition of ‘Shahpur Jat Autumn Festival’ which celebrating the city’s hub of fashion and striking history. o Shahpur Jat is of the oldest villages of the city and is home to potters, painters, designers, workshops, boutiques, historical tombs, cafes and many more. It is near the ruins of Alauddin Khilji’s medieval Siri Fort. ❖ Senior IPS officer of Gujarat cadre Anup Kumar Singh has been appointed as director general of the National Security Guard (NSG). o The NSG was raised as the federal contingency force to counter terrorists and hijack-like incidents in 1984. It’s 35th raising day was celebrated recently on October 15th at Manesar, Haryana. ❖ The Supreme Court has ordered the inter-cadre transfer of Assam National Register of Citizens (NRC) Coordinator Prateek Hajela IAS to Madhya Pradesh without specifying any reason. o For more on NRC please go here: https://www.tnpscthervupettagam.com/articles- detail/national-register-of-citizens-nrc ❖ Two Latin American countries – Brazil and Venezuela have won a contested election for a seat on the UN Human Rights Council. o The 193-member UN General Assembly elected 14 members to the 47- member Human Rights Council for three-year terms starting January 1, 2020. o Under its rules, seats are allocated to regions (Asian, African, Latin American.) to ensure geographical representation. ❖ At 6%, China’s GDP growth during July-September 2019 quarter has become the lowest-ever growth rate recorded in the last 30 years. o The U.S.-China trade war has worsened China’s jobs and wage situation and corporations also refrained from making capital investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Independence and Impartiality: a Sinking Belief Naveed Naseem 1 Shaista Qayoom 2
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND JUSTICE Judicial Independence and Impartiality: A Sinking Belief Naveed Naseem 1 Shaista Qayoom 2 Abstract For efficient working of a republican setup rooted totally on Rule of law, an unbiased and impartial judiciary is indispensable. The percept of judicial independence and impartiality has brought greater significance in the countries with written constitutions, where the executive has been conferred with wide authority to sprint the government and the likelihood of abuse of such power is considerably high. In a country like India where judiciary is regarded as the watchdog of democracy, it undoubtedly becomes essential that judges in their individual capacities and the judiciary as a whole are unbiased and neutral of all interior and exterior influences in order to guard and shield the philosophical and conceptual phrases used in the preamble of the Indian Constitution. Besides, an impartial and independent choice mechanism is a sure safeguard for ensuring that persons with dubious integrity do not occupy high judicial offices, thereby enhancing public’s have faith and self assurance in justice delivery mechanism of the country. Considering the significance which an unelected judiciary wheels in our system, the screening of judges to man the superior courts cannot be confined to mere technical and professional competence and their approaches and philosophies have to be screened extensively. The paper attempts to reflect the significance adhered to the principle of independent and impartial judiciary and the urgency to defend and hold such standards earlier than its dimensions turn into just indistinct and academic concepts. The continuous government stalling in the appointment of judges to the Superior Courts, nominating judges to political offices and occasionally unscrupulous conduct by some judges in the recent past, where judiciary on most part seemed to side with the executive, has raised questions on independent and impartial identity of judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • Clcns at TOP GOVERNANCE
    SOME OF OUR GLITTERING STARS… CLCns AT TOP GOVERNANCE Late. Shri Arun Jaitley Former Minister of Finance, Minister of Corporate Affairs and Minister of Information and Broadcasting in the Union Cabinet of India Batch (1974 - 1977) Mr. Kiren Rijiju Minister of State of the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports and Ministry of State in the Ministry of Minority Affairs Former Minister of State of Home Affairs on the Union Cabinet of India Batch (1990 - 1993) 1 Mr. Kapil Sibal Former Minister of Law and Justice, Minister of Communications and Information Technology of the Union Cabinet of India Batch (1968 - 1970) Mr. Bhupinder Singh Hooda Mr. Jarbom Gamlin Former Chief Minister of Haryana Former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh Batch (1968 - 1971) Batch (1981 – 1984) 2 CLCns AT THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Punchhi Hon'ble Mr. Justice Y.K. Sabharwal Former Chief Justice of India Former Chief Justice of India Batch (1952 - 55) Batch (1961 - 1964) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi Former Chief Justice of India Batch (1975- 1978) 3 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikramajit Sen Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur Former Supreme Court Judge Former Supreme Court Judge Batch (1974 - 1977) Batch (1974 - 1977) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arjan Kumar Sikri Former Supreme Court Judge Batch (1971 - 1974) 4 SITTING JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton F. Nariman Hon’ble Dr. Justice D. Y. Chandrachud Batch (1971 - 1974) Batch (1979 – 1982) Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta Batch (1976 – 1979) Batch (1975 – 1978) 5 Hon'ble Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • [2014] 4 SCR 583 ABCDEFGHABCDEFGH 584 583 RAM NIRANJAN ROY V. STATE
    [2014] 4 S.C.R. 583 584 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 4 S.C.R. RAM NIRANJAN ROY A A Supreme Court - He is guilty of contempt of Supreme Court v. - He is directed to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000/- - Constitution of STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. India, 1950 - Art. 129. (Criminal Appeal No. 1240 of 2004) CONTEMPT OF COURT: MARCH 31, 2014 B B Contempt in the face of court - Held: When a contempt [RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI AND is committed in the face of the High Court or the Supreme MADAN B. LOKUR, JJ.] Court to scandalize or humiliate the Judge, instant action may be necessary - There was no question of giving the appellant CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971: any opportunity to make his defence - Natural justice - C C Opportunity of hearing. s. 14 - Contempt of court - Contemner appearing-in- person before High Court and shouting at court and making In a writ petition (C.W.J.C. No.1311 of 2003), filed in false statement before court - High Court holding him guilty public interest, raising several issues relating to law and of contempt of court and directing him to be taken into custody order problem in the State of Bihar, the High Court and to be sent to jail for 24 hours as punishment - Held: The D D directed the Director General of Police to make a list of intemperate language used by the appellant while addressing officers starting from the Station House Officers up to the the Judges of the High Court is most objectionable and Additional Director General of Police, of those who had contumacious - He did not show any remorse - He did not remained in their station for more than four years.
    [Show full text]
  • Do “Executive Courts” Pose a Problem in India’S Federal Democracy? : an Analysis Based on Shri Ranjan Gogoi’S Nomination to the Rajya Sabha
    ISSN 2455-4782 DO “EXECUTIVE COURTS” POSE A PROBLEM IN INDIA’S FEDERAL DEMOCRACY? : AN ANALYSIS BASED ON SHRI RANJAN GOGOI’S NOMINATION TO THE RAJYA SABHA Authored by: Aadhya Shrotriya* * 4th Year BA LLB Student, O.P. Jindal Global University __________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Federalism is the one of hallmarks of our Indian democracy. It resonates throughout all the structures of government and is deeply enshrined in our constitution. Within the federal framework, the doctrine of “separation of powers” amongst the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary specifically has supreme importance and is considered to be a part of the basic structure of the constitution1. This doctrine consists of one important idea, that is, that the same person should not be a part of more than one of the 3 organs.2 Although, sometimes an indirect overlap of duties can take place. A pertinent example of this is the development of “executive courts”. Slogans of judicial independence are being widely heard across the nation over the past decade. This principle also has formed a part of the basic structure of our constitution3. Usually, an independent judiciary is understood to mean independence from the rest of the government and from executive control. However, independence means something more than that. It also means that judges perform their function while keeping their personal biases and prejudices aside. The foundation of this idea lies on the recognition that even though law is heavily influenced by a country’s political scenario, it cannot be reduced to it.4 It is imperative to keep this is mind especially when dealing with questions of administrative law because that is the vulnerable zone when judiciary may overstep its duties to accommodate executive orders.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Chief Justices of India There Have Been 47 Chief Justices in India Till Date
    List of Chief Justices of India There have been 47 Chief justices in India till date. H J Kania served as the First Chief Justice Of Supreme Court of India. The list of Chief Justice of India is given below: Chief Justice of India – List Tenure H.J Kania 26 January 1950 – 6 November 1951 M. Patanjali Sastri 7 November 1951 – 3 January 1954 Mehr Chand Mahajan 4 January 1954 – 22 December 1954 Bijan Kumar Mukherjea 23 December 1954 – 31 January 1956 Sudhi Ranjan Das 1 February 1956 – 30 September 1959 Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sinha 1 October 1959 – 31 January 1964 P. B. Gajendragadkar 1 February 1964 – 15 March 1966 Amal Kumar Sarkar 16 March 1966 – 29 June 1966 Koka Subba Rao 30 June 1966 – 11 April 1967 Kailas Nath Wanchoo 12 April 1967 – 24 February 1968 Mohammad Hidayatullah 25 February 1968 – 16 December 1970 Jayantilal Chhotalal Shah 17 December 1970 – 21 January 1971 Sarv Mittra Sikri 22 January 1971 – 25 April 1973 A. N. Ray 26 April 1973 – 27 January 1977 Mirza Hameedullah Beg 29 January 1977 – 21 February 1978 Y. V. Chandrachud 22 February 1978 – 11 July 1985 P. N. Bhagwati 12 July 1985 – 20 December 1986 Raghunandan Swarup Pathak 21 December 1986 – 18 June 1989 Engalaguppe Seetharamaiah Venkataramiah 19 June 1989 – 17 December 1989 Sabyasachi Mukharji 18 December 1989 – 25 September 1990 Ranganath Misra 26 September 1990 – 24 November 1991 Kamal Narain Singh 25 November 1991 – 12 December 1991 Madhukar Hiralal Kania 13 December 1991 – 17 November 1992 Lalit Mohan Sharma 18 November 1992 – 11 February 1993 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix by Avani Bansal.Pdf
    AGE TENURE IN WHILE PREVIOUS LEGAL DIFFERENTLY NAME STATE RELIGION GENDER EDUCATION STATUS SC AS CJI MOVING POSITION LEGACY ABLED TO SC Associate Judge of the 26th January Federal Court 1950 – 6th LLB & LLM from (then was H.J. KANIA November Gujarat 60 yrs. Hindu Male None No Government Law appointed as 1951 (1 year, College, Bombay the first CJ in 284 days) Supreme Court) Third in 7 November seniority in 1951 - 3 B.A and LLB from M. Patanjali Madras High January 1954 Madras 62 yrs. Hindu Male None No Madras University in Sastri Court, later, (2 years, 1912 Judge of the 57 days) Federal Court 4 January Prime 1954 - 22 Father LL. B degree from Mehr Chand Himachal Minister of December 65 yrs. Hindu Male (Advocate No Government Mahajan Pradesh Jammu & 1954 Lala Brij Lal) College, Lahore Kashmir (352 days) 23 Judge in December M.A.(History), B.L. Supreme Bijan Kumar 1954 – 31 (Gold Medalist), Calcutta 63 yrs. Hindu Male Court 14 Oct. None No Mukherjea January 1956 M.L.(Gold Medalist), 1948-22 (1 year, Doctor of Law Dec.1954. 39 days) 1 February Chief Justice 1956 – 30 of Punjab September L.L.B from University Sudhi Ranjan Das Calcutta 62 yrs. Hindu Male High Court None No 1959 College, London from 1949 to (3 years, 1950. 241 days) 1 October B.A. (Hons.) and 1959 – 31 Chief Justice Bhuvaneshwar M.A. Examinations January 1964 Bihar 60 yrs. Hindu Male of Bombay None No Prasad Sinha of the Patna (4 years, High Court University 122 days) 1 February M.A.
    [Show full text]