DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix by Avani Bansal.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AGE TENURE IN WHILE PREVIOUS LEGAL DIFFERENTLY NAME STATE RELIGION GENDER EDUCATION STATUS SC AS CJI MOVING POSITION LEGACY ABLED TO SC Associate Judge of the 26th January Federal Court 1950 – 6th LLB & LLM from (then was H.J. KANIA November Gujarat 60 yrs. Hindu Male None No Government Law appointed as 1951 (1 year, College, Bombay the first CJ in 284 days) Supreme Court) Third in 7 November seniority in 1951 - 3 B.A and LLB from M. Patanjali Madras High January 1954 Madras 62 yrs. Hindu Male None No Madras University in Sastri Court, later, (2 years, 1912 Judge of the 57 days) Federal Court 4 January Prime 1954 - 22 Father LL. B degree from Mehr Chand Himachal Minister of December 65 yrs. Hindu Male (Advocate No Government Mahajan Pradesh Jammu & 1954 Lala Brij Lal) College, Lahore Kashmir (352 days) 23 Judge in December M.A.(History), B.L. Supreme Bijan Kumar 1954 – 31 (Gold Medalist), Calcutta 63 yrs. Hindu Male Court 14 Oct. None No Mukherjea January 1956 M.L.(Gold Medalist), 1948-22 (1 year, Doctor of Law Dec.1954. 39 days) 1 February Chief Justice 1956 – 30 of Punjab September L.L.B from University Sudhi Ranjan Das Calcutta 62 yrs. Hindu Male High Court None No 1959 College, London from 1949 to (3 years, 1950. 241 days) 1 October B.A. (Hons.) and 1959 – 31 Chief Justice Bhuvaneshwar M.A. Examinations January 1964 Bihar 60 yrs. Hindu Male of Bombay None No Prasad Sinha of the Patna (4 years, High Court University 122 days) 1 February M.A. from Deccan 1964 – 15 Judge of the College (Pune) in P. B. March 1966 Karnataka 63 yrs. Hindu Male Bombay High None No 1924 and LL.B. with Gajendragadkar (2 years, Court honors from the ILS 42 days) Law College in 1926 16 March Chief Justice Amal Kumar 1966 – 29 The University of Calcutta 65 yrs. Hindu Male of Bombay None No Sarkar June 1966 Calcutta High Court (105 days) Father 30 June 1966 Chief Justice Venkata - 11 April of Andhra Raman Rao- Law at Madras Law Koka Subba Rao Madras 64 yrs. Hindu Male No 1967 (285 Pradesh High Judge of College days) Court Madras High Court 12 April 1967 Chief Justice Kailas Nath - 24 February Wadham College, Allahabad 64 yrs. Hindu Male of Bombay None No Wanchoo 1968 (318 Oxford High Court days) Author: Avani Bansal 25 February Nagpur Alma mater 1968 -16 Chief Justice Grand father from Mohammad December of Madhya Advocate Lucknow 63 yrs. Muslim Male No University;Trinity Hidayatullah 1970 (2 Pradesh High Munshi in College, Cambridge years, 294 Court. Varanasi Lincoln's Inn days) 17 December Chief Justice Jayantilal Elphinstone college 1970 -21 Gujarat 64 yrs. Hindu Male of Bombay None No Chhotalal Shah in Bombay January 1971 High Court (35 days) First Chief 22 January Justice of 1971 - 25 India Trinity Hall, Sarv Mittra Sikri April 1973 (2 Lahore 63 yrs. Hindu Male None No appointed Cambridge years, 93 directly from days) the Bar 26 April Son Justice 1973- 27 Ajoy Nath Presidency Ajit Nath Ray January 1977 Kolkata 61 yrs. Hindu Male Ray in No Oriel College, Oxford College (3 years, 276 Allahabad days) High Court 29 January Chief Justice Father Mirza Trinity College and Mirza 1977- 21 of the Samiullah Cambridge Hameedullah February Hyd. 64 yrs. Muslim Male Himachal Beg -Chief No University, later Beg 1978 (1 year, Pradesh High Justice of London School of 23 days) Court Hyd. State Economics 22 February Sons D.Y, 1978- 11 July Judge in the Abhinav and Earliest LLM Y. V. 1985 (7 Pune 58 yrs. Hindu Male Supreme Chintan, No graduates at Chandrachud years, 139 Court of India lawyers and Bombay University days) legal scholars Father- 12 July 1985 Justice - 20 Chief Justice, Natwarlal H. P. N. Bhagwati December Gujarat 64 yrs. Hindu Male Gujarat High No Bombay University Bhagwati- 1986 (1 year, Court Supreme 161 days) Court judge 21 December Chief Justice Raghunandan 1986- 18 Law at Allahabad UP 62 yrs. Hindu Male of Bombay None No Swarup Pathak June 1989 (2 University High Court years, 179 days) 19 June Engalaguppe 1989- 17 Chief Justice Seetharamiah December Karnataka 65 yrs. Hindu Male of Bombay None No Not known Venkataramiah 1989 (181 High Court days) Elder Brother- 18 Justice December Chief Justice Prasanta Sabyasachi 1989- 25 of the Bihari Calcutta 62 yrs. Hindu Male No Calcutta University Mukherjee September Calcutta High Mukharji- 1990 (281 Court Chief Justice days) of the Calcutta High Court Author: Avani Bansal 26 September Son- Dipak Chief Justice Ravenshaw College 1990- 24 Misra, Chief Ranganath Misra Odisha 64 yrs. Hindu Male of Orissa High No and Allahabad November Justice of Court University 1991 (1 year, India 59 days) 25 November Chief Justice Kamal Narain 1991- 12 Allahabad 65 yrs. Hindu Male of Allahabad None No Allahabad University Singh December High Court 1991 (17 days) 13 Uncle- Harilal December Chief Justice J. Kania, the Madhukar 1991- 17 of the Government Law Mumbai 64 yrs. Hindu Male first Chief No Hiralal Kania November Bombay High College, Mumbai Justice of 1992 (340 Court India. days) 18 Father- L.N. November Chief Justice Sinha, former Lalit Mohan 1992- 11 Bihar 64 yrs. Hindu Male of Patna High Attorney No Patna University Sharma February Court General of 1993 (85 India days) 12 February 1993-24 Chief Justice Bachelor in Law M. N. October Mysore 64 yrs. Hindu Male of Karnataka None No from the Bangalore Venkatachaliah 1994 (1 year, High Court university 254 days) 25 October 1994- 24 Degree of Doctor of Chief Justice Aziz Mushabber March Laws from Gujarat 62 yrs. Muslim Male of Gujarat None No Ahmadi 1997(2 University of High Court years, 150 Leicester, England days) Chief Justice, 25 March Rajasthan B.Sc and LL.B from Jagdish Sharan 1997- 17 Madhya High Court 64 yrs. Hindu Male None No University of Verma January 1998 Pradesh and Madhya Allahabad (298 days) Pradesh High Court 18 January Chief Justice 1998- 9 Madan Mohan of Punjab and Department of Law, October Punjab 65 yrs. Hindu Male None No Punchhi Haryana High Delhi 1998 (264 Court days) 10 October Chief Justice 1998- 31 of Jammu and Adarsh Sein October Kashmir High University College Jammu 62 yrs. Hindu Male None No Anand 2001 (3 Court and London years, 21 Madras High days) Court 1 November Chief Justice Sam Piroj 2001- 5 May of the Sikkim 65 yrs. Hindu Male None No Not known Bharucha 2002 (185 Karnataka days) High Court 6 May 2002- Lahore Chief Justice Bhupinder Nath 7 November (shifted to St Stephens College, 65 yrs. Hindu Male of the Gujarat None No Kirpal 2002(185 Delhi after Delhi University High Court days) partition) Author: Avani Bansal 8 November 2002- 18 Chief Justice Ewing Christian Gopal Ballav December Odisha 65 yrs. Hindu Male of Patna High None No College, Allahabad Pattanaik 2002 (40 Court University days) 19 Chief Justice December of the St. Joseph's College, V. N. Khare 2002- 1 May Allahabad 63 yrs. Hindu Male None No Calcutta High Allahabad 2004 (1 year, Court 134 days) Raja Lakhamagouda 2 May 2004- Chief Justice Law College, S. Rajendra Babu 31 May 2004 Bangalore 65 yrs. Hindu Male of Karnataka none No Belgaum Karnataka (29 days) High Court University 1 June 2004- Chief Justice Ramesh Chandra 31 October Madhya Bar in Guna district 64 yrs. Hindu Male of Delhi High None No Lahoti 2005 (1 year, Pradesh in 1960 Court 152 days) 1 November Chief Justice Yogesh Kumar 2005- 13 Delhi 63 yrs. Hindu Male of Bombay None No Not Known Sabharwal January 2007 High court (1 14 January Maharaja's College, 2007- 12 Chief Justice K. G. Ernakulam and May 2010 (3 Kerala 62 yrs. Hindu Male of Gujarat None No Balakrishnan Government Law years, 118 High Court College, Ernakulam days) 12 May 2010- 28 Chief Justice September Zoroa- of the Government Law S. H. Kapadia Mumbai 63 yrs. Male None No 2012 (2 strian Uttarak-hand College, Mumbai years, 139 High Court. days) 29 Faridapur September Chief Justice (Now Altamas Kabir 2012- 18 July 64 yrs. Muslim Male of Jharkhand None No Presidency College Bangla- 2013 (292 High Court desh) days) 19 July 2013- Chief Justice Ayya Nadar Janaki P. Sathasivam 26 April 2014 Tamil Nadu 63 yrs. Hindu Male of Punjab and None No Ammal College, (281 days) High Court Sivakasi Father- 27 April Justice S K 2014- 27 Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Mal Lodha, BSc and LLB at the September Jodhpur 65 yrs. Hindu Male of Patna High No Lodha former Judge Jodhpur University 2014 (153 Court of Rajasthan days) High Court 28 Chief Justice September of Chhatti- 2014- 2 sgarh High H. L. Dattu Karnataka 64 yrs. Hindu Male None No Not Known December Court and 2015 (1 year, Kerala High 65 days) Court Author: Avani Bansal 3 December Father Late Chief Justice 2015- 3 Shri Devi Das of Punjab and Department of Law T. S. Thakur January 2017 J&K 63 yrs. Hindu Male Thakur, No Haryana High Jammu University (1 year, 31 Judge of High Court days) Court of J & K 4 January Chief Justice Jagdish Singh 2017- 27 of the Panjab University, Kenya 65 yrs. Sikh Male None No Khehar August 2017 Karnataka Chandigarh (235 days) High Court 28 August 2017- 2 Chief Justice Madhusudan Law Dipak Misra October Odissa 64 yrs. Hindu Male of the High None No College, Cuttack 2018 (1 year, Court of Patna 35 days) 3 October Chief Justice 2018- 17 of Punjab and Ranjan Gogoi November Assam 66 yrs.
Recommended publications
  • Supreme Court of India

    Supreme Court of India

    Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Re: Filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court. Against the sanctioned strength of 31 Judges, the Supreme Court of India is presently functioning with 25 Judges, leaving six clear vacancies. The Collegium met today to consider filling up of these vacancies and after extensive discussion and deliberations unanimously resolves to fill up, for the present, two of these vacancies. The Collegium discussed names of Chief Justices and senior puisne High Court Judges eligible for appointment as Judges of the Supreme Court. The Collegium considers that at present Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph, who hails from Kerala High Court and is currently functioning as Chief Justice of Uttarakhand High Court, is more deserving and suitable in all respects than other Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts for being appointed as Judges of the Supreme Court of India. While recommending the name of Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph, the Collegium has taken into consideration combined seniority on all-India basis of Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts, apart from their merit and integrity. Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph was appointed as a Judge of the Kerala High Court on 14th October, 2004 and was elevated as Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court on 31st July, 2014 and since Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) 2 then has been functioning there. He stands at Sl. No.45 in the combined seniority of High Court Judges on all-India basis. We have also considered the names of eminent members of the Bar.
  • Vividh Bharati Was Started on October 3, 1957 and Since November 1, 1967, Commercials Were Aired on This Channel

    Vividh Bharati Was Started on October 3, 1957 and Since November 1, 1967, Commercials Were Aired on This Channel

    22 Mass Communication THE Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, through the mass communication media consisting of radio, television, films, press and print publications, advertising and traditional modes of communication such as dance and drama, plays an effective role in helping people to have access to free flow of information. The Ministry is involved in catering to the entertainment needs of various age groups and focusing attention of the people on issues of national integrity, environmental protection, health care and family welfare, eradication of illiteracy and issues relating to women, children, minority and other disadvantaged sections of the society. The Ministry is divided into four wings i.e., the Information Wing, the Broadcasting Wing, the Films Wing and the Integrated Finance Wing. The Ministry functions through its 21 media units/ attached and subordinate offices, autonomous bodies and PSUs. The Information Wing handles policy matters of the print and press media and publicity requirements of the Government. This Wing also looks after the general administration of the Ministry. The Broadcasting Wing handles matters relating to the electronic media and the regulation of the content of private TV channels as well as the programme matters of All India Radio and Doordarshan and operation of cable television and community radio, etc. Electronic Media Monitoring Centre (EMMC), which is a subordinate office, functions under the administrative control of this Division. The Film Wing handles matters relating to the film sector. It is involved in the production and distribution of documentary films, development and promotional activities relating to the film industry including training, organization of film festivals, import and export regulations, etc.
  • Module Detail Subject Name Political Science Paper Name Indian Politics

    Module Detail Subject Name Political Science Paper Name Indian Politics

    Module Detail Subject Name Political Science Paper Name Indian Politics: I THE JUDICIARY IN INDIA Module Name/Title Module Id Pre-requisites To understand and evaluate the working of Objectives Indian Judicial System. To explain the evolution and rise of the Supreme Court in India. Role of judicial activism towards public interest litigation and in what way it contributed to shape the nature and contours of judicial activism in India. To explain various problems and challenges faced by the judiciary and reform initiatives to address them. Judiciary, Role and Functioning, the Supreme Court, Keywords Public Interest Litigation, Judicial Overreach, Judicial Activism, Judicial Accountability, Reforms, India. 1 Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Prof. Ashutosh Kumar Panjab University Chandigarh. Dr. Ajay K Mehra Paper Coordinator Delhi University, Delhi. Dr. Niranjan Sahoo Content Writer/Author (CW) Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi. Dr. Ajay K Mehra Content Reviewer (CR) Delhi University, Delhi. Dr. Ajay K Mehra Language Editor (LE) Delhi University, Delhi. THE JUDICIARY IN INDIA Niranjan Sahoo Introduction From being a reliable guardian and protector of constitution, an able propagator of rights of poor and faceless citizens to an institution of last recourse for millions of citizens to activism on issues that often get little or no attention from the executive, the judiciary in India has come full circle since its inception in 1950. The judiciary which has so far played extremely stellar role in having emerged as institution of last resort as executive and legislative branches have failed to perform their constitutional roles, has in many occasions intruded into the constitutional spaces of other organs.
  • Ecovid-19 the Economy and the Virus

    Ecovid-19 the Economy and the Virus

    SPECIAL DIGITAL ISSUE www.outlookindia.com April 6, 2020 Rs 60 eCOVID-19 The Economy and The Virus RNI NO. 7044/1961 MANAGING EDITOR, OUTLOOK ‹ N A V I G A T O R › EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Ruben Banerjee MANAGING EDITOR Sunil Menon FROM EXECUTIVE EDITOR Satish Padmanabhan FOREIGN EDITOR Pranay Sharma THE POLITICAL EDITOR Bhavna Vij-Aurora SENIOR EDITOR Giridhar Jha (Mumbai) CHIEF ART DIRECTOR Deepak Sharma EDITOR WRITERS Lola Nayar, Qaiser Mohammad Ali (Senior Associate Editors), G.C. Shekhar (Associate Editor), Jeevan Prakash Sharma (Senior Assistant Editor), Ajay Sukumaran, Puneet Nicholas Yadav, Jyotika Sood, Lachmi Deb Roy (Assistant Editors), Naseer Ganai (Senior Special Correspondent), Preetha Nair (Special Correspondent), Salik Ahmad (Senior Correspondent) COPY DESK Rituparna Kakoty (Senior Associate Editor), Anupam Bordoloi, Saikat Niyogi, Satyadeep (Associate Editors), Syed Saad Ahmed (Assistant Editor) PHOTOGRAPHERS S. Rakshit (Chief Photo Coordinator), Jitender Gupta (Photo Editor), Tribhuvan Tiwari (Deputy Photo Editor), Sandipan Chatterjee, Apoorva Salkade (Sr Photographers), Suresh Kumar Pandey (Staff Photographer) J.S. Adhikari (Sr Photo Researcher), RUBEN BANERJEE U. Suresh Kumar (Digital Library) Digitally Yours EDITOR IN CHIEF DESIGN Saji C.S. (Chief Designer), Leela (Senior Designer), Devi Prasad, Padam Gupta (Sr DTP Operators) the near-collapse of our daily routine. Printing a magazine DIGITAL Neha Mahajan (Associate Editor), Soumitra Mishra (Digital Consultant), when movements are severely restricted poses immense Jayanta Oinam (Assistant Editor), challenges. Even if we print, distribution of copies at a time Mirza Arif Beg (Special Correspondent), Neelav Chakravarti (Senior when flight and train services have been halted, and sever- Correspondent), Charupadma Pati (Trainee EAR is in the air and I am Journalist), Suraj Wadhwa (Chief not entirely exempt from it.
  • Issue 15:Constitutional Expectation

    Issue 15:Constitutional Expectation

    Paramount Law Times Newsletter Issue no 015 www.paramountlaw.in 1 (For uptodating law and events) 2014-15 – (second half) Issue no 0015 Dated 01 September, 2014 CONSTITUTIONAL EXPECTATION Present Issue : Dr. S. K. Kapoor Ved Ratan Constitutional Expectation Dr. S. K. Kapoor 01 Ved Ratan Constitution is Supreme Chief Justices of India Subhash Nagpal 1. „Constitution of India is Supreme‟. It is the first value of law. All other values of Indian laws are tested for their virtues on the touchstone of the Constitution of India. WELCOME ANNOUNCEMENT 02 State Judicial Services preparations Constitutional Authorities Guidance facility Finding necessity for guidance for all 2. In India, the „Constitutional authorities‟ are the those preparing for State Judicial creation of the Constitution. This being so the Services Competitions Examinations, Constitution regarding its values, functions and Paramount Law Consultants Ltd. has speaks through authorities created by the decided to help with valuable guidance. Constitution itself. Interested persons are welcome. 3. With it, the Constitutional expectation becomes Legal Audit and Moral Audit Services the core question of interpretation for which the Paramount Law Consultants Ltd., Delhi Constitution puts the responsibility upon the has completed its research and is taking judicial organ of state created by the Constitution. up legal audit and moral audit services for the Corporates. 4. And this responsibility has been discharged by the Subhash Nagpal Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court in its Chairman judgment dated 27-August-2014 in case Manoj Paramount Law Consultants Ltd., Delhi Narula Vs. Union of India in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 289 Of 2005.
  • 2021 Banerjee Ankita 145189

    2021 Banerjee Ankita 145189

    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The Santiniketan ashram as Rabindranath Tagore’s politics Banerjee, Ankita Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 THE SANTINIKETAN ashram As Rabindranath Tagore’s PoliTics Ankita Banerjee King’s College London 2020 This thesis is submitted to King’s College London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy List of Illustrations Table 1: No of Essays written per year between 1892 and 1936.
  • National Initiative to Reduce Pendency and Delay in Judicial System

    National Initiative to Reduce Pendency and Delay in Judicial System

    Conference Proceedings of National Initiative to Reduce Pendency and Delay in Judicial System Organized by : SUPREME COURT OF INDIA In collaboration with : THE INDIAN LAW INSTITUTE New Delhi 27-28 July 2018 Hon’ble Shri Justice Dipak Misra Chief Justice of India Conference Proceedings of National Initiative to Reduce Pendency and Delay in Judicial System CONTENTS PART I PAGES BACKGROUND 13 INAUGURAL SESSION: Inaugural Address by Hon’ble Shri Justice Dipak Misra, Chief Justice of India 16 Summary of Special Address by Hon’ble Shri Justice Ranjan Gogoi, 26 Judge, Supreme Court of India Summary of Address by Hon’ble Shri Justice Madan B. Lokur, 29 Judge, Supreme Court of India Summary of Address by Hon’ble Shri Justice Kurian Joseph, 34 Judge, Supreme Court of India Vote of Thanks by Prof. (Dr.) Manoj Kumar Sinha, 38 Director, Indian Law Institute SESSION I: CASE AND COURT MANAGEMENT TO STRENGTHEN JUDICIARY – THE WAY AHEAD Chair: Hon’ble Shri Justice A.K. Sikri, 43 Judge, Supreme Court of India Co Chair: Hon’ble Shri Justice D.B. Bhosale, 44 Chief Justice, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Speaker: Prof. (Dr.) M.P. Singh, Chancellor, Central University of Haryana 45 & Chair Professor, Centre for Comparative Law, National Law University, Delhi Summing up by the Chair 46 SESSION II: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE MECHANISM- AN EFFECTIVE SOLUTION TOWARDS REDUCING PENDENCY Chair: Hon’ble Shri Justice Kurian Joseph, 53 Judge, Supreme Court of India Co Chair: Hon’ble Shri Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, 54 Judge, Supreme Court of India Speaker: Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, Vice Chancellor, 55 National Law University, Delhi Summing up by the Chair 57 7 Conference Proceedings of National Initiative to Reduce Pendency and Delay in Judicial System SESSION III: USE OF TECHNOLOGY – A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO ADDRESS DELAY AND TO DELIVER SPEEDY JUSTICE Chair: Hon’ble Shri Justice Madan B.
  • Section:X in the Supreme Court of India Civil Original

    Section:X in the Supreme Court of India Civil Original

    SECTION:X IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 BETWEEN: Dr. Akkai Padmashali & Ors. …Petitioners Vs. Union of India & Ors................................................... Respondents I N D E X Sl No PartiCulars Copies Court Fee 1. List of Dates 1+3 2. Writ Petition with Affidavit 1+3 Rs. 3. Annexure-P-1 to P- 1+3 Rs. 4. Listing Proforma 1+1 5. Vakalatnama with Memo of Appearance. Rs. Rs. Filed By: (O.P. Bhadani) Advocate for the Petitioners Office: O-1/B, LGF (Basement) Jangpura Extension, ND-14 CODE NO. 1934 I.C. No.4812 Mob: 9717268550 New Delhi Filed On: .07.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 IN THE MATTER OF: Dr. Akkai Padmashali & Ors. …Petitioners Vs. Union of India & Ors.................................................. Respondents P A P E R B O O K [FOR INDEX, PLEASE SEE INSIDE] ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS: O.P. BHADANI SYNOPSIS 1. The Petitioners, who are members of the transgender community, are filing the present Writ Petition seeking a declaration that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is unconstitutional, being violative of their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. 2. The Constitutionality of Section 377 IPC has been upheld by this Hon’ble Court in the judgment reported as Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation, (2014) 1 SCC 1. After dismissal of Review Petitions filed to challenge the said judgment, Curative Petitions were filed, and this Hon’ble Court has been pleased to direct the matters to be heard by a Constitution Bench.
  • Notice of Motion for Presenting an Address to the President of India for the Removal of Mr

    Notice of Motion for Presenting an Address to the President of India for the Removal of Mr

    1 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR PRESENTING AN ADDRESS TO THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA FOR THE REMOVAL OF MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA, CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA, UNDER ARTICLE 217 READ WITH 124 (4) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA THIS HOUSE RESOLVES that an address be presented to the President of India for the removal of Mr. Justice Dipak Misra, from the office of Chief Justice of India, for his following acts of misbehaviour, detailed in the Explanatory Note annexed herewith: I. The facts and circumstances relating to the Prasad Education Trust case, show prima facie evidence suggesting that Chief Justice Dipak Misra may have been involved in the conspiracy of paying illegal gratification in the case, which at least warrants a thorough investigation. II. That the Chief Justice Dipak Misra dealt on the administrative as well as judicial side, with a writ petition which sought an investigation into a matter in which he too was likely to fall within the scope of investigation since he had presided over every bench which had dealt with this case and passed orders in the case of Prasad Education Trust, and thus violated the first principle of the Code of Conduct for judges. III. That the Chief Justice Dipak Misra appears to have antedated an administrative order dated 6th November 2017 which amounts to a serious act of forgery/fabrication. IV. That Chief Justice Dipak Misra acquired land while he was an advocate, by giving an affidavit that was found to be false and despite the orders of the ADM cancelling the allotment in 1985, surrendered the said land only in 2012 after he was elevated to the Supreme Court.
  • Justice Prakash Tatia 1. Date of Birth: 4Th August, 1951 2. Education

    Justice Prakash Tatia 1. Date of Birth: 4Th August, 1951 2. Education

    Justice Prakash Tatia 1. Date of birth: 4th August, 1951 2. Education: B.Sc. (Biology) 1972, LL.B, 1975 3. Enrolled as Advocate: 1975 4. Judge Rajasthan High Court: 11.01.2001 5. Judge Jharkhand High Court: 11.04.2011 6. Act. Chief Justice Jharkhand High Court: 13.05.2011 7. Chief Justice Jharkhand High Court: 11.09.2011 8. Chairperson Armed Forces Tribunal, New Delhi: 23.08.2013 9. Chairperson, Rajasthan State Human Rights Commission, Jaipur: 11.03.2016 10. Was Member, Advisory Committee, National Court Management Systems (NCMS), constituted by Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Shri S. H. Kapadia First Committee (a) Hon’ble Shri Justice Altamas Kabir, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (b) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. Sathasivam, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (c) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. C. Tatia, Chief Justice, Jharkhand High Court. Second Committee (a) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. Sathasivam, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (b) Hon’ble Shri Justice R. M. Lodha, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (c) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. C. Tatia, Chief Justice, Jharkhand High Court. Third Committee (a) Hon’ble Shri Justice R. M. Lodha, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (b) Hon’ble Shri Justice H.L. Duttu, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (c) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. C. Tatia, Chief Justice, Jharkhand High Court. Justice Prakash Tatia, when he was Judge of Raj. High Court, he was appointed as 11. Executive Chairperson, Raj. State Legal Services Authority, 12. Chairperson, Raj. State Judicial Academy, 03.03.2009 – 10.04.2011 13.
  • Asia Index Launches S&P BSE Private Banks Index

    Asia Index Launches S&P BSE Private Banks Index

    THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 Asia Index launches S&P BSE The International Women Entrepreneurs Sakshi Choudhary clinches Private Banks Index Summit 2018 gold medal at World Youth 5 September 2018 (International News) 5 September 2018 (International News) Boxing in Budapest The International Women Entrepreneurs 5 September 2018 ( Sports News) Asia Index Pvt Ltd, a joint Summit 2018 was inaugurated by the Vice venture between S&P Dow Jones President of Nepal Nanda Bahadur Pun in In boxing, Indices and BSE Ltd, announced Kathmandu, the capital of Nepal on former junior the launch of an index designed September 3, 2018. world champion to measure the performance of Nepal‘s Vice President emphasised upon empowering women boxer Sakshi private banks. in all areas including social, political and economic. The three- Choudhary day event is being organised by the South Asian Women added the youth The S&P BSE Private Banks Index is drawn from the Development Forum. It is expected to witness participation crown to her constituents of the S&P BSE Finance Index, the Asia's oldest from delegates belonging to 27 countries including China and cabinet in the 57- exchange said in a statement. the SAARC, ASEAN, EU, African and Arab countries. The kilogram Only common stocks classified as Banks by the BSE Sector Theme of the International Women Entrepreneurs Summit category, Classification model and that are not classified under the 2018: ‗Equality begins with Economic Empowerment‘ claiming the gold BSE scrip category as a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) are Objective of the Summit at the World Youth Boxing in Budapest.
  • The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 1968

    The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 1968

    CJB. ill; N*. tat LOK SABHA THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS BILL, 1968 (Report of the Joint Committee) [Presented on the 26th March, 1969] L O K SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI March, jjtyfChaitra, 18 9 1 iSoka) P r ic e : R s. 1.45 REPORTS OF THfi JOIflC/SELECT COMMITTEES " "jBEBaBn a p to larara'iM um m b — -------------- YE1B m v .--------------------- •* • 31.No. Name Presented on 1# Contract labour (Regulation and Abolition) 26*2*69 B ill, 1967 -(Joint Committee report) 2* ~/o—' Evidence 3* Lokpa? and Lokayuktas B ill, 1968 26*3*69 ( J o i r t Committee report) , * 4* -do- Evidence 5* -do- Statement containing a gist of main points made by Witnesses in their Evidence before the Joint Committee* 6* Government (Liability in Tort) B ill,1967 25*3*69 (Report of the Joint Committee)^ 7* -do- Evidenoe 8* Constitution (Twenty-Seoond) Amendment 12*3*69 B ill, 1968 (Report of Joint Committee) 9* -do- Evidence 10* Indian Penal Code (Amendment) B ill,1967 1*5*69 (Report of the Seleot Committee) ?heduled Castes and Schedules Tribes 17*11*69 Mere (Amendment) B ill, 1967 x>rt of the Joint Committee) ’o- Evidence of the Appellate (Criminal) 17*11*69 i.o i s 4k.of the Supreme Court B ill, i^i Anand Narain Mulla,M*P* ' Seleot Committee) LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT CORRIGENDA TO ' THE REPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS BILL, 1968. "" Report of the Joint Committee 1. Page (viii), line 15, for"1850" read"1950". 2. Page (viii), line 23, for "Commitee" read "Committee".