DOCSLIB.ORG

I. Transboundary Water Management at the National Level

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I. Transboundary Water Management at the National Level Template for reporting under the Water Convention and for global SDG indicator 6.5.2 Country name: [Republic of Serbia] Serbia covers an area of 88,361 km² and includes two provinces: Vojvodina and Kosovo – Metohija.1 This template or reporting form is in the form of a questionnaire to be filled out. Questions can be either “closed”, Yes /No , with appropriate boxes to tick; “open”, requiring further information to be supplied, indicated by the words in square brackets [fill in]; or a combination of both. Depending on the country situation, it will not always be necessary to fill in extra information where space is provided for this. The questions are divided into four parts: national (section I); by transboundary basin, river, lake or aquifer (section II); list of transboundary waters and information for calculation of the SDG indicator 6.5.2, Proportion of transboundary basin area with an operational arrangement for water cooperation (section III), and final questions (section IV). Please answer open questions very briefly, and in less than 200 words, using bullet points as appropriate. Section II will need to be to completed for each of the transboundary basins, rivers, lakes or aquifers (please just copy the template for these questions and fill out again for each additional transboundary basin, river, lake or aquifer). The template encourages those reporting to refer to the reporting under other multilateral environmental agreements to which their country is a Party. I. Transboundary water management at the national level In this first section, you are requested to provide general information on transboundary water management at the national level. Information on specific transboundary basins, rivers, lakes or aquifers and agreements should be presented in section II and not repeated here. 1. (a) Does your country’s national legislation refer to measures to prevent, control and reduce any transboundary impact (art. 2 of the Convention)? Yes /No If yes, list the main national legislation: [Water Law, "Official Gazette of RS", no. 30/2010, 93/2012 and 101/2016; Law on Environmental Protection, ("Official Gazette of RS" no. 135/2004, 36/2009, 72/2009, 43/2011 and 14/2016)¸ Law on Integrated Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution, "Official Gazette of RS", no. 135/ 04 and 25/2015; Law on Ratification of the Convention on the protection and use of transboundary watercourses and international lakes and the amendments to the Articles. 25 and 26 of the Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, Official Gazette of RS, International agreements 1/10] (b) Do your country’s national policies, action plans and strategies refer to measures to prevent, control and reduce any transboundary impact? Yes /No 1 Territory of Autonomous Province Kosovo and Metohija is in accordance with UNSCR Resolution 1244 under UN administration If yes, list the main national policies, action plans and strategies: [Strategy for water management for the territory of the Republic of Serbia until 2034, "Official Gazette of RS" no. 3/2017] (c) Does your country’s legislation provide for the following principles? Precautionary principle Yes /No Polluter pays principle Yes /No Sustainable development Yes /No (d) Does your country have a national licensing or permitting system for wastewater discharges and other point source pollution (art. 3, para. 1 (b)) (e.g., in industry, mining, energy, municipal, wastewater management or other sectors)? Yes /No If yes, for which sectors? (please list): [industry, energy, waste, wastewater management, mining, agricultural (farming) ] If not, please explain why not (giving the most important reasons) or provide information if there are plans to introduce a licensing or permitting system: [fill in] If your country has a licensing system, does the system provide for setting emission limits based on best available technology? Yes /No (e) Are the authorized discharges monitored and controlled (art. 3, para. 1 (b))? Yes /No If yes, how? (Please tick the ones applicable): Monitoring of discharges Monitoring of physical and chemical impacts on water Monitoring of ecological impacts on water Conditions on permits Inspectorate Other means (please list): [Inspections are carried out periodically] If your country does not have a discharge monitoring system, please explain why not or provide information if there are plans to introduce a discharge monitoring system: Monitoring system for control of the discharge of waste water is not established in the Republic of Serbia. In accordance with the Regulations on the method and conditions for measuring the amount and quality of discharged waste water, and the content of the report on the measurements ("Official Gazette of RS" no. 33/2016) subject operates the control. (f) What are the main measures which your country takes to reduce diffuse sources of water pollution on transboundary waters (art. 3, para. 1) (e.g., from agriculture, transport, forestry or aquaculture)? The measures listed below relate to agriculture, but other sectors may be more significant. Please be sure to include these under “others”: Legislative measures Norm for uses of fertilizers Norms for uses of manure Bans on or norms for use of pesticides Others (please list): [fill in] Economic and financial measures Monetary incentives Environmental taxes (such as fertilizer taxes) Others (please list): [fill in] Agricultural extension services Technical measures Source control measures Crop rotation Tillage control Winter cover crops Others (please list): [fill in] Other measures Buffer/filter strips Wetland reconstruction Sedimentation traps Chemical measures Others (please list): [fill in] Other types of measures If yes, please list: All listed measures are not obligatory. Regional services for agriculture advising are established. (g) What are the main measures which your country takes to enhance water efficiency (art. 3)? Please tick as appropriate (not all might be relevant) A regulatory system regarding water abstraction Monitoring and control of abstractions Water rights are clearly defined Water allocation priorities are listed Water-saving technologies Advanced irrigation techniques Demand management activities Other means (please list) (h) Does your country apply the ecosystems approach (art. 3, para. 1 (i), and art. 2, para. 1 (d))? Yes /No If yes, please describe how: [fill in] (i) Does your country take specific measures to prevent the pollution of groundwaters (art. 3, para. 1 (k))? Yes /No If yes, please list the most important measures: [protection zones and banned discharge in to the ground water] 2. Does your country require transboundary environmental impact assessment (EIA)? Yes /No Does your country have procedures for transboundary EIA? Yes /No If yes, please make reference to the legislative basis (please insert the name and section of the relevant laws). (Please note: If your country is a Party to the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, you may refer to your country’s report under that Convention.): Law on ratification of the Protocol on Strategic environmental impact assessment to the Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context ("Off. Gazette of RS - International Treaties", no. 1/2010) 3. Does your country have transboundary agreements or arrangements for the protection and/or management of transboundary waters (i.e., surface waters or aquifers), whether bilateral, multilateral and/or at the basin level? Yes /No If yes, list the bilateral, multilateral and basin agreements (listing for each of the countries concerned): With HUNGARY: The agreement between the governments of the FPR of Yugoslavia and the PR of Hungary regarding water management issues, 1955. With ROMANIA: • The agreement between the governments of FPR of Yugoslavia and the PR of Romania concerning water engineering issues related to boundary and transboundary systems and watercourse, 1955. • Several agreements and conventions governing the construction, operation and maintenance of the Iron Gate Hydro Power and Navigation System Djerdap were entered into by Yugoslavia and Romania in 1963, 1964, 1967, 1976, 1977, 1987, and 1998. With BULGARIA: The agreement between the governments of the FPR of Yugoslavia and the PR of Bulgaria concerning water management issues, 1958. The agreement is formally in force, but cooperation was discontinued in 1982. OTHER NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES: No bilateral agreements with Croatia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro. BASIN AGREEMENTS: - Convention on Co-operation for the Protection and Sustainable use of the Danube River (Danube River Protection Convention) – surface and ground waters - Framework Agreement on the Sava River Basin – surface and ground waters II. Questions for each transboundary basin, river, lake or aquifer Name of the transboundary basin, river, lake or aquifer, or group thereof, list of the riparian States, and country’s share of the basin: Danube River Basin (DRB) – Black Sea Basin Danube River Basin cover 81.560,00 km2 (92.3%) of the territory of Serbia and 10,2 % of the entire Danube River Basin territory. Coverage in DRb Share of DRb Percentage of Country Code (km2) (%) territory within the DRb (%) Albania AL 126 < 0.1 0.01 Austria* AT 80,423 10.0 96.1 Bosnia and Herzegovina* BA 36,636 4.6 74.9 Bulgaria* BG 47,413 5.9 43.0 Croatia* HR 34,965 4.4 62.5 Czech Republic* CZ 21,688 2.9 27.5 Germany* DE 56,184 7.0 16.8 Hungary* HU 93,030 11.6 100.0 Italy IT 565 < 0.1 0.2 Macedonia MK 109 < 0.1 0.2 Moldova* MD 12,834 1.6 35.6 Montenegro* ME 7,075 0.9 51.2 Poland PL 430 < 0.1 0.1 Romania* RO 232,193 29.0 97.4 Serbia* RS 81,560 10.2 92.3 Slovak Republic* SK 47,084 5.9 96.0 Slovenia* SI 16,422 2.0 81.0 Switzerland CH 1,809 0.2 4.3 Ukraine* UA 30,520 3.8 5.0 total 801,463 100 – * Contracting Party to the ICPDR Neighboring countries are Hungary, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Od Ljubotena Do Koraba
    ** , Udeleženci ekskurzije (pred Ujedinjenjem) Foto Zerooiien Br. Od leve na desno stoje: Pleterski Miran, Ljubljana; Šenk Marjan, Ljubljana; Tavčar Ivo, Ljubljana: Marsel Ivo, Ljubljana; dr.inž. Avčin France, Ljubljana: dr. Pretnar Jože, Ljub- ljana; Kavčič Janko, Beograd; dr. Smodlaka Vojin, Beograd; Zupančič Uroš, Jesenice; Jordan Bogdan, Ljubljana; Velijevič Nuriman, nosač, Lisac; Ametovii Dževair, nosae, Lisac; Frelih Matevž, Jesenice; dr. Mišic Dimitrije, Beograd. Sede: Dimnik Maks, Dovje; Kavalar Jože, Srednja vas v Bohinju; poručnik Karadžič, Skoplje; Spasič Drago, Skoplje. Manjkata: dr. Tominšek Stanko, Ljubljana; Zergollen Bruno, Zagreb. Od Ljubotena do Koraba. i. Dr. Jože Pretnar: Planinsko-smučarska odprava v Južno Srbijo. Njen postanek in pomen. V poletju 1933 so me vodila moja planinska romanja preko planin Južne Srbije: čez Perister in Galičico na Korab, pa preko Šar Planine in Čakora na Kotor. Izpolnil se mi je s tem mladostni sen, da si ogledam deželo kraljeviča Marka. Vtisi, ki so jih na- pravili name ti divni planinski kraji s svojimi prirodnimi, zgodo- vinskimi in narodnimi zanimivostmi in lepotami, so mi ostali ne- pozabni; pustili so za seboj hrepenenje, da se še in še vrnem v objem teh gora. Pri pogledu na prostrane planjave in zložno pada- joče gole strmine, od temena najvišjih vrhov do podnožja, so mi, že takrat rodile prepričanje, da imamo ne samo v državi, temveč tudi Planinski Vestnlk, 1J3J, št. 7 177 v evropskih gorovjih malo planin, ki bi nudile tako odlične pogoje za planinsko smučanje. Takrat sem se poslovil od Koraba z obljubo: »Kmalu na svidenje — v zimi!« Ob priliki lanskega kongresa Zveze planinskih društev kralje- vine Jugoslavije, ki se je vršil v Beogradu, je v razgovoru z neka- terimi tovariši padla odločitev, da se v okviru Zveze in pod pokro- viteljstvom ministrstva za telesno vzgojo naroda priredi v zimi ali zgodnji pomladi skupinska planinsko-smučarska tura po grebenih in vrhovih cd Ljubotena preko Šar Planine, Popove Šapke, Aleksan- drovega Visa in Šutmana ob Rudoki in Vraca-Planini na gorsko gmoto Koraba.
    [Show full text]
  • WBEC-REG-ENE-01 Final Report Author
    Code: WBEC-REG-ENE-01 REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE HYDROPOWER IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Final Report August 2018 IPA 2011-WBIF-Infrastructure Project Facility- Technical Assistance 3 EuropeAid/131160/C/SER/MULTI/3C This project is funded by the European Union Information Class: EU Standard formation Class: EU Standard The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Mott MacDonald IPF Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This r epor thas been prepared solely for use by the party which commissioned it (the ‘Client’) in connection with the captioned project. It should not be used for any other purpose. No person other than the Client or any party who has expressly agreed terms of r eliance with us ( the ‘Recipient(s)’) may r ely on the content, information or any views expressed in the report. We accept no duty of care, responsibility or liability to any other recipient of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo - Locations of Mass Graves - Reported Or Found As at 20 June 99 ^
    I KOSOVO - LOCATIONS OF MASS GRAVES - REPORTED OR FOUND AS AT 20 JUNE 99 ^ 20° 20°30' 21 ° 21°30'E l I BRUZNIK^ l TREPCA I ^ ^ CIKATOVA ^ I G I ^ Sjenica Raska CIREZ G I KOSOVSKA MITROVICA I l l I DOBROSEVAC l Prokuplje l Belo Brdo l G l I DONJE PREKAZE I Toplica l Ibar l l l PODUJEVO DRENICA I ^ ^ ^ ^ G l I GLADNO SELO Lesak G Kursumlija I Koporice G GOLEMO SELO l AVALAN Novi Pazar GI Leposavic´ POKLEK l ^ G I ^ REZALA Duboka Socanica G l GLAVNIK AREA SRBICA AREA I 43°N I l Krpimej G ° I 43 NEVOLJANE Bajgora l I G G IZBICA D.Dubnica l ^ ^ l I l G Montenegro GGZvecan PodujevoG DUZ Zubin Potok Lebane I ISTOK Kosovska Mitrovica l GlavnikG ^ ^ I l Batlava Medveda ´ ^ ^ KOLIC G Vucitrn G Orlane G PADALISTE Rozaje I G Rudnik l Istok G G Sitnica G G.Klina I l LUKARE G ^ ^ RADOVAC and RUCKHAT Srbica I Beli N.Selo G Prugovac ^ ^ G ^ ^ G Dobrusa G GSt.Poljance ^ G l G I Kacikol Drim Durakovac Priluzje PRISTINA AREA G Klina ^ ^ l ^ Vitomirica ^ ´ I G I PEC AREA I I Budisavci I I G Obilic´ TrstenikI G Josanica l I G Pristina l Pec´ I ^ ^ G I I Banjica I I I G I I NAKARAD G I G G I Strezovce ^ ´ Rausic´ G ^ Glogovac Kosovo I ^ LJUBENIC Klina ^ ^ G G ^ I Iglarevo Polje G Krusevac G Komorane Velika I G.KaracevoG G I ^ Gracanica G ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ G.Streoc G G Slatina ✈ Koretin LIPLJAN I Kijevo Decani G Lapusnik I G IMagura RATIS G Lipljan Rznic´ G I G RopotovoG ^ ^ ° I G 42 30' ^ G Brasaljce ^ 42°30' Prilep MalisevoMalisevo Dobrcane SLOVINJE G I G G I KRALJANE I Bujanovac Junik G I ^ G ^ G ^ ^ ^ Gnjilane I I ^ Podgrade ^ G Belanica G ^ Lucane I G G ^ Skivjan
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo After Haradinaj
    KOSOVO AFTER HARADINAJ Europe Report N°163 – 26 May 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE RISK AND DEFLECTION OF REBELLION................................................... 2 A. MANAGEMENT OF THE HARADINAJ INDICTMENT ..................................................................2 B. SHADOW WARRIORS TEST THE WATER.................................................................................4 C. THE "WILD WEST" ON THE BRINK ........................................................................................6 D. DUKAGJINI TURNS IN ON ITSELF ...........................................................................................9 III. KOSOVO'S NEW POLITICAL CONFIGURATION.............................................. 12 A. THE SHAPE OF KOSOVO ALBANIAN POLITICS .....................................................................12 B. THE OCTOBER 2004 ELECTIONS .........................................................................................13 C. THE NETWORK CONSOLIDATES CONTROL ..........................................................................14 D. THE ECLIPSE OF THE PARTY OF WAR? ................................................................................16 E. TRANSCENDING OR DEEPENING WARTIME DIVISIONS?.......................................................20 IV. KOSOVO'S POLITICAL SYSTEM AND FINAL STATUS..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Status: Delay Is Risky
    KOSOVO STATUS: DELAY IS RISKY Europe Report N°177 – 10 November 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. THE STATUS EQUATION........................................................................................... 1 A. AHTISAARI’S WORK...............................................................................................................2 B. FUTURE INTERNATIONAL PRESENCE .......................................................................................7 1. The International Community Representative..............................................................7 2. The EU Rule-of-Law Mission.....................................................................................9 3. Transition..................................................................................................................11 II. ON THE GROUND ...................................................................................................... 12 A. ALBANIANS ........................................................................................................................12 1. Management of the negotiations................................................................................12 2. Status expectations....................................................................................................13 3. Ground-level politics.................................................................................................15 B. SERBS .................................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Godišnji Izveštaj O Stanju Životne Sredine Na Kosovu, 2015
    Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosova-Republic of Kosovo Qeveria - Vlada - Government MINISTRIA E MJEDISIT DHE PLANIFIKIMIT HAPËSINOR MINISTARSTVO SREDINE I PROSTORNOG PLANIRANJA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANNING AGJENCIA PËR MBROJTJEN E KOSOVSKA AGENCIJA KOSOVO ENVIRONMENTAL MJEDISIT TE KOSOVËS ZA ZAŠTITU SREDINE PROTECTION AGENCY Godišnji izveštaj o stanju Životne Sredine na Kosovu Priština, 2017 Godišnji izveštaj o stanju životne sredine na Kosovu 2 Godišnji izveštaj o stanju životne sredine na Kosovu Sadržaj 1. Uvod 2. Stanje životne sredine i promene u sredini u poređenju sa prethodnim izveštajem 2.1. Vazduh 2.2. Voda 2.3. Zemljište 2.4. Biološka raznovrsnost (biodiverzitet) i zaštićene zone 2.5. Odpaci 3. Sredina i javno zdravstvo 4. Stanje sredine ugroženih zona 4.1. Zona EKK-a i uticaj na sredinu 4.2. Zona „NewCoFeronikeli“ i uticaj na sredinu 4.3. Zona Sharrcem-a i uticaj na sredinu 4.4. Ostale ugrožene zone 5. Iskorišćavanje prirodnih resurca 6. Sprovođenje Strategije i Plana Delovanja za Sredinu 7. Preduzete mere za zaštitu sredine, uspesi proizašli iz preduzetih mera i njihov efekat na ekonomski razvoj 7.1. Usklađivanje nacionalnog središnog zakonodavstva sa Smernicama EZ-a 7.2. Inspekcija i kontrolisanje sprovođenja zakona 7.3. Izdavanje dozvola 7.4. Rehabilitacija zemljišta, zagađenih površina i njihovo nadgledanje 7.5. Regulisanje rečnih korita i njihovo pročišćavanje 7.6. Razvoji i stagniranja (smetnje) pri ojačavanju središnih institucija 8. Investicije za zaštitu sredine 9. Reference 10. Dodaci Agencia za Zaštitu Sredine Kosova 3 Godišnji izveštaj o stanju životne sredine na Kosovu 1. Uvod Izrada Izveštaja o Stanju Sredine na Kosovu je osnovana na Zakonu o Zaštiti Sredine1 .
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Fifth National Report
    CONTENT ABBREVIATIONS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1. BIODIVERSITY IN SERBIA – STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS; SIGNIFICANCE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR HUMAN WELL-BEING 14 1.1. Abiotic and biotic factors of biodiversity in Serbia 14 1.2. Diversity of ecosystems in Serbia 15 1.3. Threats and pressures exerted on biodiversity in sensitive ecosystems 18 1.3.1. Pressures on biodiversity - examples 22 1.4. Protected areas 28 1.4.1. National protected areas 29 1.4.2. Areas of international importance for the conservation of biodiversity 34 1.5. Protected species 36 1.5.1. Diversity of macromycetes in Serbia 41 1.6. Overview of studies and data on ecosystem services in Serbia 43 1.7. Natural resource systems and well-being of people in Serbia 48 1.7.1. Agricultural land in Serbia 49 1.7.2. Allocation of agricultural land 50 1.7.3. National agroecological program 53 1.7.5. Fish resources in Serbia 55 1.7.6. Forest ecosystems 57 1.7.7. Ecosystem services – forest ecosystems 60 1.7.8. Collection of wild species from nature 63 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR BIODIVERSITY WITH AN ACTION PLAN AND THE INCLUSION OF BIODIVERSITY INTO OTHER SECTORS 70 2.1. The Strategy for biodiversity of the Republic of Serbia with the Action plan for the period from 2011 to 2018 70 2.2. Strategic goals of biodiversity 71 2.3. Review of the Strategy of biodiversity in Serbia 74 2.4. Activities taken at the national level regarding implementation of the Convention on Biodiversity, after submission of the Fourth national report (2011-2014) 75 2.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Hazard Susceptibility Assessment: Case Study – Municipality of Štrpce (Southern Serbia)
    Multi-Hazard Susceptibility Assessment: Case Study – Municipality of Štrpce (Southern Serbia) Uroš Durlević ( [email protected] ) University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3497-5239 Ivan Novković University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography Ivan Samardžić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography Vladimir Ćurić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography Natalija Batoćanin University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography Aleksandar Valjarević University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography Tin Lukić University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management Research Article Keywords: GIS, seismic hazard, erosion, torrential oods, snow avalanches, forest res Posted Date: May 27th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-528793/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Multi-hazard susceptibility assessment: Case study – Municipality of Štrpce (Southern Serbia) Uroš Durlević1*, Ivan Novković1, Ivan Samardžić1, Vladimir Ćurić1, Natalija Batoćanin1, Aleksandar Valjarević1, Tin Lukić2 1University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography, Studentski trg 3/3, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; 2University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The Municipality of Štrpce (Southern Serbia) is an area located within the Šar Mountain National Park, and due to its great ecological importance, it was necessary to analyze the terrain susceptibility to the occurrence of natural hazards. The main goal of this research is to determine the locations that are most susceptible to natural hazards (earthquakes, erosion, torrential flooding, snow avalanches and forest fires) on the territory of the municipality of Štrpce.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Guide of Kosovo Archaeological Guide of Kosovo
    Archaeological Guide of Kosovo Archaeological Guide of Kosovo Publisher: Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sport Archaeological Institute of Kosovo Author: Milot Berisha Editing Council: Vjollca Aliu, Director, Cultural Heritage Department at the Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sport Kemajl Luci, Archaeologist, Senior Cultural Manager at the Kosovo Museum Dr.sc. Enver Rexha, Director, Archaeological Institute of Kosovo Dr.sc. Shafi Gashi, Archaeologist, Archaeological Institute of Kosovo Mr.sc. Premtim Alaj, Archaeologist, Archaeological Institute of Kosovo Dip.sc. Luan Gashi-Anthropologist, Archaeological Institute of Kosovo Map compilation: Faik S. Berisha Design: www.xhad.net Translation in English language: Mr.sc. Snoudon Daci Pristina 2012 Dear friends, The guide that you already have in your hands marks a very significant step towards documentation and presentation of our archeo- logical heritage. This guide is a short summary, but very important one that aims to offer explanations for some tens of archeological sites, from 400 of them identified in total in the territory of Kosovo until now, and registered in the List of Cultural Heritage for Temporary Protection of Republic of Kosovo. As such, the guide will serve as an informant for chosen locations and maybe the most important ones documented in Kosovo. This guide is dedicated to all group ages that are curious to know about abundant archeological heritage of our country. The guide is prepared in a chronological order starting from prehistory until the medieval period. The Archeological heritage of Kosovo, recorded until today, presents a very valuable treasure of our country. The archeological po- tential identified during the second part of the last century has been documented through variety of archeological research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory and Characterization of Torrential Flood Phenomenon in Serbia
    Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 23, No. 3 (2014), 823-830 Original Research The Inventory and Characterization of Torrential Flood Phenomenon in Serbia Ana Petrović1*, Stanimir Kostadinov1, Slavoljub Dragićević2 1Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Viseslava 1, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia 2Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 3/3, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Received: 11 September 2013 Accepted: 22 December 2013 Abstract Torrential floods are the most destructive and most frequent natural disasters in Serbia with severe social, economic, cultural, and environmental consequences that deserve special attention. This paper presents a data- collection strategy and data analysis in terms of spatial and temporal characterization of the torrential flood phe- nomenon in Serbia for the last 99 years. Based on the available information obtained from various reliable sources, we registered 848 torrential flood events for 1915-2013. The registered number of deaths from tor- rential floods is over 133, including 24 people from 1991 to 2010. Monthly distribution of registered torrential floods indicates that the majority of floods occurred in Serbian territory in late spring (from May to the end of June) and the greatest number of torrential floods is registered in Southern Morava basin. This work resulted in creating a first inventory of torrential floods in Serbia and its analysis for the purpose of the spatial and tem- poral distribution and characterization of this phenomenon. The inventory on torrential floods will be integrat- ed in future in a unique multi-user database on natural hazards in Serbia, and it should become a part of the European database of natural hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Strategy for the Republic of Macedonia
    Water Strategy for the Republic of Macedonia DRAFT FINAL VERSION 2010 Government of the Republic of Macedonia Government of the Republic of Slovenia Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Republic of Macedonia Government of the Republic of Slovenia Government of the Republic of Slovenia Title: Water Strategy for the Republic of Macedonia Water strategy for the Republic of Macedonia / DRAFT VERSION I Contracting Authority: Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Republic of Macedonia Reference / Project No.: 52 – 1411 – 00 - 2009 Executing companies: Lead Partner: Hidroinženiring d.o.o. Ljubljana Slovenčeva 95 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia Partner: RIKO d.o.o. Ljubljana Bizjanova 2 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia Hidroinženiring d.o.o. General Manager: Boris Savnik Water strategy for the Republic of Macedonia / DRAFT VERSION II LIST OF TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT TEAM Jernej Novak, B.Sc.Civ.Eng Project leader Neža Kodre, B.Sc.Civ.Eng, M.Sc.Civ.Eng Surface water expert Sergeja Terpin Savnik, B.Sc.Civ.Eng Surface water expert Petra Repnik Mah, B.Sc.Civ.Eng Surface water expert Sonja Šiško Novak, B.Sc.Civ.Eng, Groundwater expert M.Sc.Civ.Eng Danilo Dolinar, B.Sc.Mechan.Eng. Waste water expert Goran Pipuš, B.Sc Chem.Eng, PhD Chem.Eng Waste water expert Natalija Kegl Pivec, B.Sc.Chem EIA expert and project coordinator Andrej Ivanc, B.Sc in Mechanical Eng., MBA, Economist M.Sc (Management and Organisation) Janez Dodič, B.Sc.Econ. Economist Polona Eržen, Bachelor of law, M.Sc. in Jurist political science Zoran Panovski, B.Sc.El.Eng., M.Sc Electrical Power Systems MACEDONIAN PARTNERS Cvetanka Popovska, PhD Civ Eng Water expert Stanislava Dodeva, PhD Civ Eng Waste waster expert Blazo Boev, PhD Expert Zlatko Ilijovski, B.Sc Groundwater expert Elenka Stojanova Jurist Water strategy for the Republic of Macedonia / DRAFT VERSION III TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Polic Y Brief
    Implementation of the new paradigm for sustainable development of the flooded areas in the search for a final solution for the status of the hydrosystem “Ibar-Lepenac” POLICY BRIEF May 2015 Dragisa Mijacic1 Introduction Immediately after the signing of the Brussels Agree- “Gazivode”, and a hydropower plant are located, ment (April 2013), representatives of the govern- as well as a small reservoir with a dam “Pridvorica”, ments and negotiating teams from Serbia and Ko- which is a starting point of the irrigation canal that sovo made it clear that the agreement about the extends to Pristina and Obilic. A significant part of Ibar-Lepenac Hydrosystem would not be reached the Gazivode reservoir is also located in the territo- easily. An active discussion about this strategically ry of Tutin and Novi Pazar municipalities. Besides, important resource continues, which can be con- the construction of the Ibar-Lepenac Hydrosystem cluded from statements of both negotiating teams. is financed from the World Bank loan that has been “Gazivode Reservoir is a natural resource and the repaid for years from the budget of the Govern- state property of Kosovo, and we will not discuss ment of Serbia. Therefore, the Government in Bel- that topic with anybody, in any circumstances” re- grade believes to have the legitimacy to impose cently said Edita Tahiri, the Chief Negotiator of the the discussions about the destiny of this company, Kosovo Government.2 “I will not give Gazivode”, Ser- by trying to transfer its management to the Asso- bian Prime Minister responds vigorously.3 These and ciation/Community of Serb-majority Municipali- many other statements clearly show that the nego- ties in Kosovo that has yet to be established in the tiations are difficult and there are no indications negotiation process carried out in Brussels under that the optimal solution will be found soon.
    [Show full text]