DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for Authority Decision-Making

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for Authority Decision-Making E2279 VOL. 1 Public Disclosure Authorized ESKOM INVESTMENT SUPPORT PROJECT Environmental Impact Report Coal Transportation System (CTS) Project Public Disclosure Authorized Proposed long-term coal supply to Eskom/s Majuba Power Station Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized SIXTH DOCUMENT September 2004 For authority decision­ making Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Coal Transportation System (CTS) Project Mpumalanga Province Proposed long-term coal supply to Eskom.'s Majuba Power Station Proponent: Eskom FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT For authority decision-making VOLUME 1 @Eskom Note: A separate Final Environmental Impact Report is available for the EIA for the proposed long-term coal supply to Eskom's Tutuka power station - Upgrade of the existing Standerton-Tutuka railway line Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT This document is the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a proposed railway line by Eskom between a point just west of Ermelo and the Majuba Power Station, The proposed railway line is part of Eskom's technical, economic and environmental feasibility study for the long-term coal supply to Majuba power station in Mpumalanga Province. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the proposed project was conducted by Golder Associates Africa (Pty) Ltd, an independent company, The ErA was conducted in terms of the ErA Regulations under Section 21 of the Environment Conservation Act, 1989, Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) were provided with copies of the full EIA Regulations, The purpose of the EIA was to investigate potential negative impacts in respect of issues and concerns raised during the scoping phase and recommend ways to avoid or reduce the impacts as well as to enhance the positive impacts identified, The purpose of the EIA was not to calculate compensation to land owners, However, land owners will be able to use the findings of the EIA to support their compensation negotiations with Eskom. Comments by Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) on the Draft EIR that was available for public comment from Monday 31 May to Wednesday 30 June 2004, are reflected in Appendix 4 to this report The text of the Draft EIR has been updated where necessary to reflect these comments and to expand on the recommendations of the EIA. The findings of the EIA will be turned into measurable actions and captured in an Environmental Management Plan (EMP), The EIR is a public document which will become legally binding on Eskom should the project be approved and go ahead, The findings are presented in the following reports: • The Final Environmental Impact Report (this report) (Volume.l) • Eight specialist reports, containing the findings of the specialist studies (Volume 2), These reports were presented in September 2004 to the lead decision-making authority of the ErA, the Mpumalanga Department of Agriculture, Land and Administration, previously the Mpumalanga Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environment (M-DACE), The reports were also presented to the commenting authorities notably the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, the Department of Minerals and Energy, the Msukaligwa (formerly Ermelo) District Municipality and partly the Tixley ka Seme (referred to as Seme) (formerly Volksrust) Municipality. Appreciation for participation by I&APs Many I&APs have participated actively during the EIA process to date by attending meetings, and by taking the time to prepare written submissions. I&APs contributed considerable local knowledge, and contributed information on previous studies done in the area. Many also hosted members of the EIA team in their homes, and showed them around the area. The EIA team wishes to express sincere appreciation for these efforts by I&APs. Note: A separate Final Environmental Report is available for the EIA of Eskom's proposed long term coal supply to Tutuka Power Station. An IDA consists of I Several phases Scoping Phase Impact·Assessment Phase To identify issues, ---+ Detailed studies of to focus the EIA potential impacts, positive and negative Figure E-l: An Environmental Impact Assessment consists of various phases. The EIA for the proposed long­ term coal supply to Eskom's Majuba power station is currently in the decision-making phase. Important note: The findings of an EIA are turned into measurable measures that are taken up in an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) that becomes legally binding once approved by the environmental authorities. Ii Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Motivation for the project. .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Screening of alternatives to supply Majuba ........................................................................... 4 1.3 Purpose and content of this report ......................................................................................... 4 1.4 Project components for which the application is being made ................................................ 5 2. SCREENING OF MAJOR PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ..............................................................................7 2.1 History of route selection for coal supply to Majuba and Tutuka power stations .................... 7 2.2 Summary of events leading up to the current study ............................................................... 7 2.3 The Coal Transport System Project (2002 - present study) ................................................ 10 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ......................................................................................12 3.1 Project design phase of the proposed Majuba railway line .................................................. 12 3.1.1 Route alignment... ............................................................................................... 12 3.1.2 Earthworks, rail and balias!" ............................................................................... 12 3.1.3 Access structures along the route ....................................................................... 13 3.1.4 Electrification....................................................................................................... 15 3.1.5 Servitude, service road and fencing .................................................................... 16 3.1.6 Upgrading of the load out system at Majuba power station ................................ 17 3.2 Construction phase of the proposed Majuba railway line ..................................................... 17 3.2.1 Pre-construction .................................................................................................. 17 3.2.2 Construction ........................................................................................................ 18 3.2.3 Establishment of site camps ........ ,...................................................................... 19 3.2.4 Employment ........................................................................................................ 20 3.2.5 Site clearing and rehabilitation ............................................................................ 20 3.3 Operational phase of the Majuba railway line ...............................................................,'...... 20 3.3.1 Train sets and train frequency ............................................................................. 20 3.3.2 Routine maintenance .......................................................................................... 20 3.4 Closure and decommissioning phase of the Majuba railway line ......................................... 21 4. THE RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................................................22 4.1 Physical environment. .......................................................................................................... 22 4.1.1 Geology and soils ............................................................................................... 22 4.1.2 Topography......................................................................................................... 23 4.1.3 Climate ................................................................................................................ 24 4.1.4 Air quality ............................................................................................................ 24 4.1.5 Surface water ...................................................................................................... 25 4.1.6 Groundwater ....................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Biological environment. ........................................................................................................ 26 4.2.1 Veld types ........................................................................................................... 26 4.2.1.1 Moist Clay Highveld Grassland .......................................................... 26 4.2.1.2 Moist Sandy Highveld Grassland ....................................................... 28 4.2.1.3 Conservation status compared with other vegetation types ............... 29 4.2.2 Threatened flora ........................... , ....................................................................... 29 4.2.3 Threatened fauna ............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Balancing the Business of Energy and Water
    Water and energy Balancing the business of energy and water As an organisation that constantly strives to limit increases in water consumption and contribute to sustainable water use, Eskom has indicated its commitment to improving the way in which South Africa’s water resources are managed. Eskom’s Nandha Govender provides insight into how this is being achieved. Article by Debbie Besseling. ith a track record of have to go beyond our own interests. some 15 years at Eskom, The idea, which is part of our strat- Govender joined the egy, is that in the course of doing Worganisation’s Generation Divi- our business, we have to find ways sion’s Primary Energy, Water Supply and means of reducing our water ABOUT NANDHA Department in 1998 as a mechani- footprint, and managing our current GOVENDER cal engineer. Today, he is the Acting water resources so that others will General Manager: Operations, under have access to it as well.” • Professional registration: the group’s Commercial and Tech- Eskom Holdings SOC Limited Engineering Council of SA nology: Primary Energy Division, is a large consumer of fresh water, • Other memberships: Certified where he is responsible for integrated accounting for approximately 2-3% Director- Institute of Directors; planning and operations of primary of the country’s total water con- National Society of Black Engineers energy resources such as coal, water sumption annually. Eskom power • Academic qualification: and limestone. In this role he pro- stations run constantly, supplying Bachelor of Science (Mechanical vides general management of the in excess of 95% of South Africa’s Engineering), University of Durban coal supply, water supply, logistics electrical energy and more than half Westville, 1995 operations as well as environmental of the electricity used on the African • First job: Apprentice diesel and technical services; a position continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Impact and Waste
    Revised DEIR: Comments and Responses Report (Version 4) i 12670 Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Impact and Waste Management License Application for the proposed Extension of the Ash Disposal Facility and Associated Infrastructure at Camden Power Station (DEA Ref No 12/12/20/2300 and NEAS Ref No: DEA/EIA/0000399/2011) Comments and Responses Report Version 4 This report (Version 4) captures the issues raised by stakeholders during the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process and Waste Management License Application for the proposed extension of ash disposal facilities and associated infrastructure at Camden Power Station. As part of the announcement, a Background Information Document (BID), with a comment and registration sheet was posted and distributed by hand during May 2011. Letters of notification were also sent out by registered mail in May 2011 to all landowners within a 10 km radius of the Camden Power Station. An advertisement was placed in various newspapers and site notices were also put up in the area of the proposed development during May 2011. An open house and public meeting to discuss the Draft Scoping Report was held at the Indawo Game Lodge, Ermelo on 27 July 2011. This event was announced by advertisements in various newspapers and letters of invitation were also sent out to stakeholders. Issues and comments raised at this meeting as well as comments received during the public review period from 18 July to 22 August 2011 were added as Version 2 of this report to the Final Scoping Report before it was submitted to the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA).
    [Show full text]
  • Sponsored by the Department of Science and Technology Volume
    Volume 26 Number 3 • August 2015 Sponsored by the Department of Science and Technology Volume 26 Number 3 • August 2015 CONTENTS 2 Reliability benefit of smart grid technologies: A case for South Africa Angela Masembe 10 Low-income resident’s preferences for the location of wind turbine farms in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa Jessica Hosking, Mario du Preez and Gary Sharp 19 Identification and characterisation of performance limiting defects and cell mismatch in photovoltaic modules Jacqui L Crozier, Ernest E van Dyk and Frederick J Vorster 27 A perspective on South African coal fired power station emissions Ilze Pretorius, Stuart Piketh, Roelof Burger and Hein Neomagus 41 Modelling energy supply options for electricity generations in Tanzania Baraka Kichonge, Geoffrey R John and Iddi S N Mkilaha 58 Options for the supply of electricity to rural homes in South Africa Noor Jamal 66 Determinants of energy poverty in South Africa Zaakirah Ismail and Patrick Khembo 79 An overview of refrigeration and its impact on the development in the Democratic Republic of Congo Jean Fulbert Ituna-Yudonago, J M Belman-Flores and V Pérez-García 90 Comparative bioelectricity generation from waste citrus fruit using a galvanic cell, fuel cell and microbial fuel cell Abdul Majeed Khan and Muhammad Obaid 100 The effect of an angle on the impact and flow quantity on output power of an impulse water wheel model Ram K Tyagi CONFERENCE PAPERS 105 Harnessing Nigeria’s abundant solar energy potential using the DESERTEC model Udochukwu B Akuru, Ogbonnaya
    [Show full text]
  • Written Statement of Mxolisi Mgojo, the Chief Executive Officer Of
    1 PUBLIC ENTERPRISES PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO ESKOM, TRANSNET AND DENEL WRITTEN STATEMENT OF MXOLISI MGOJO, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF EXXARO RESOURCES LIMITED INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 COST-PLUS MINES VERSUS COMMERCIAL MINES .......................................... 5 THE SO-CALLED “PRE-PAYMENT” FOR COAL ................................................. 9 PREJUDICE TO EXXARO’S COST-PLUS MINES AND MAFUBE ..................... 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 11 Arnot mine ............................................................................................................. 12 Eskom’s failure to fund land acquisition ................................................................. 12 Non-funding of operational capital at Arnot ............................................................ 14 The termination of Arnot’s CSA .............................................................................. 15 Conclusion of the Arnot matters ............................................................................. 19 Mafube mine.......................................................................................................... 19 Matla mine ............................................................................................................. 21 Non-funding of capital of R1.8 billion for mine 1 ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of South African Coal: Market, Investment, and Policy Challenges
    PROGRAM ON ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Working Paper #100 January 2011 THE FUTURE OF SOUTH AFRICAN COAL: MARKET, INVESTMENT, AND POLICY CHALLENGES ANTON EBERHARD FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES About the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development The Program on Energy and Sustainable Development (PESD) is an international, interdisciplinary program that studies how institutions shape patterns of energy production and use, in turn affecting human welfare and environmental quality. Economic and political incentives and pre-existing legal frameworks and regulatory processes all play crucial roles in determining what technologies and policies are chosen to address current and future energy and environmental challenges. PESD research examines issues including: 1) effective policies for addressing climate change, 2) the role of national oil companies in the world oil market, 3) the emerging global coal market, 4) the world natural gas market with a focus on the impact of unconventional sources, 5) business models for carbon capture and storage, 6) adaptation of wholesale electricity markets to support a low-carbon future, 7) global power sector reform, and 8) how modern energy services can be supplied sustainably to the world’s poorest regions. The Program is part of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. PESD gratefully acknowledges substantial core funding from BP and EPRI. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development Encina Hall East, Room E415 Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6055 http://pesd.stanford.edu About the Author Anton Eberhard leads the Management Programme in Infrastructure Reform and Regulation at the University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Malcolm Roods Market Segment Leader Transport and Planning
    Curriculum Vitae Malcolm Roods Market Segment Leader Transport and Planning T: +27117986000 F: +27117986005 Email: [email protected] Malcolm Roods is a Principal with RHDHV Nationality specializing in Environmental Impact Assessments South African (EIA) for electricity supply (generation, transmission and distribution), road infrastructure, residential Years of Experience developments as well as water management 15 year(s) projects. This builds on a broad government background, which has made him particularly Years with Royal HaskoningDHV flexible. His past experience include 6 years public 8 year(s) service which included policy development, environmental law reform and EIA reviews. His Professional memberships experience also includes more than 5 years of Environmental Assessment Practitioners of SA environmental consulting in the field of Impact Assessment and Authorisation Applications, with a Qualifications focus on legislative requirements and business 2000 BA (Hons) Geography and Environmental Management, management. Potchefstroom University, South Africa Since joining the company he has been involved with major EIA projects such as the Transnet New 1999 BA Public and Private Sector, Potchefstroom University, Multi Product Pipeline (NMPP), various Rand Water South Africa Pipeline projects, numerous Eskom Research, Generation, Transmission and Distribution projects, 1997 Higher Education Diploma Intermediate Phase, as well as undertook Independent Reviews of the Potchefstroom University, South Africa EIA process for the National
    [Show full text]
  • Betrayal of the Promise: How South Africa Is Being Stolen
    BETRAYAL OF THE PROMISE: HOW SOUTH AFRICA IS BEING STOLEN May 2017 State Capacity Research Project Convenor: Mark Swilling Authors Professor Haroon Bhorat (Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town), Dr. Mbongiseni Buthelezi (Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of the Witwatersrand), Professor Ivor Chipkin (Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of the Witwatersrand), Sikhulekile Duma (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Lumkile Mondi (Department of Economics, University of the Witwatersrand), Dr. Camaren Peter (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Professor Mzukisi Qobo (member of South African research Chair programme on African Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, University of Johannesburg), Professor Mark Swilling (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Hannah Friedenstein (independent journalist - pseudonym) Preface The State Capacity Research Project is an interdisciplinary, inter- that the individual confidential testimonies they were receiving from university research partnership that aims to contribute to the Church members matched and confirmed the arguments developed public debate about ‘state capture’ in South Africa. This issue has by the SCRP using largely publicly available information. This dominated public debate about the future of democratic governance triangulation of different bodies of evidence is of great significance. in South Africa ever since then Public Protector Thuli Madonsela published her report entitled State of Capture in late 2016.1 The The State Capacity Research Project is an academic research report officially documented the way in which President Zuma and partnership between leading researchers from four Universities senior government officials have colluded with a shadow network of and their respective research teams: Prof. Haroon Bhorat from the corrupt brokers.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Consultant Specialisation
    CURRICULUM VITAE KAREN JODAS (nee KÜCK) SAVANNAH ENVIRONMENTAL (PTY) LTD Profession : Environmental Consultant Specialisation : Strategic environmental assessment and advice; project management and co-ordination of environmental projects; environmental compliance monitoring; Environmental Impact Assessment; environmental management; peer review; policy, strategy and guideline formulation; renewable energy projects, hydrology and water management Work experience : Twelve (12) years in the environmental field VOCATIONAL EXPERIENCE Provide technical input for projects in the environmental management field, specialising in strategic evaluation, Environmental Impact Assessment studies, Environmental Management Plans, integrated environmental management, environmental compliance monitoring (ECO role); peer review of EIA reports and processes, strategy and guideline development, and public participation. Key focus on overall Project Management, integration of environmental studies and environmental processes into larger engineering-based projects, strategic assessment, and the identification of environmental management solutions and mitigation/risk minimising measures. Undertaking studies requiring all environmental-related disciplines has allowed for considerable experience to be gained in the environmental assessment and management fields. A specialist area of focus is on management and assessment of multi-faceted projects, including electricity generation and transmission projects (with a strong focus in renewable energies), linear developments
    [Show full text]
  • Cenyu Scoping Report
    EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING Cenyu/ Cenyulands Housing Dev elopment Scoping Report December 2011 J29034A Arcus GIBB (Pty) Ltd Reg. 1992/007139/07 East London Office: 9 Pearce St reet , Berea , East London PROPOSED CENYU/ CENYULANDS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT DRAFT SCOPING REPORT CONTENTS Chapter Description Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Report 1 1.2 EIA Process 1 2 PROPOSED ACTIVITY 5 2.1 Location of the proposed activity 5 2.2 Description of Proposed Activity 7 2.3 Roads 9 2.4 Stormwater Drainage 9 2.5 Bulk Water Supply and Reticulation 12 2.6 Sanitation 13 2.7 Motivation for Proposed Activity 13 2.8 Alternatives 13 3 LEGISLATION AND POLICY GUIDELINES CONSIDERED 15 3.1 The Constitution of South Africa (Act No. 108 of 1996) 15 3.2 The National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998) 15 3.3 Legislation for the Conservation of Natural Resources 17 3.4 Summary of Relevant Legislation 22 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT 24 4.1 Introduction 24 4.2 Physical Environment 24 4.3 Biological Environment 27 4.4 Socio-Economic Environment 31 4.5 Cultural/ Historical sites 32 i 5 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND IMPACTS IDENTIFIED 33 5.1 Project activities affecting the environment 33 5.2 Need and Desirability of Project 34 5.3 Biophysical Impacts 35 5.4 Ecological Impacts 36 5.5 Socio-economic Impacts 37 5.6 Cumulative Impacts 37 5.7 Key Issues to be addressed in the EIA Phase 38 6 METHODOLOGY IN ASSESSING IMPACTS 39 6.1 Introduction 39 7 PLAN OF STUDY FOR EIA 42 7.1 Introduction 42 7.2 Key Issues to be addressed in the
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Coalfields – a 2014 Perspective
    South Africa's coalfields – a 2014 perspective 1Hancox, P. John and 2,3Götz, Annette E. 1University of the Witwatersrand, School of Geosciences, Private Bag 3, 2050 Wits, South Africa; [email protected] 2University of Pretoria, Department of Geology, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa; [email protected] 3Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan 420008, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation Highlights • South Africa’s Coalfields are presented. • The role of Gondwanan coals as palaeoclimate archives is stated. • Future research fields include palynology, sequence stratigraphy, basin fill. Abstract For well over a century and a half coal has played a vital role in South Africa’s economy and currently bituminous coal is the primary energy source for domestic electricity generation, as well as being the feedstock for the production of a substantial percentage of the country’s liquid fuels. It furthermore provides a considerable source of foreign revenue from exports. Based on geographic considerations, and variations in the sedimentation, origin, formation, distribution and quality of the coals, 19 coalfields are generally recognised in South Africa. This paper provides an updated review of their exploration and exploitation histories, general geology, and coal seam nomenclature and coal qualities. Within the various coalfields autocyclic variability is the norm rather than the exception, whereas allocyclic variability is much less so, and allows for the correlation of genetically related sequences. During the mid-Jurassic break up of Gondwana most of the coals bearing successions were intruded by dolerite. These intrusions are important as they may cause devolatilisation and burning of the coal, create structural disturbances and related seam correlation problems, and difficulties in mining operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Load Management of Water Projects Using an Integrated Systems Approach by Chris Scheepers, Dr
    APPLICATION Load management of water projects using an integrated systems approach by Chris Scheepers, Dr. Gerhard Bolt and Marius Kleingeld, North-West University The Department of Water Affairs (DWA), is responsible for the sustainable supply of useable water in South Africa. This water is not only used for residential and agricultural purposes but also to provide water for industrial processes, the mining industries and cooling water for power stations. South Africa is divided into 19 water catchment areas. This case study focuses on the Usutu-Vaal government water scheme (GWS). In Mpumalanga close to Standerton, which supplies water to Sasol and four power stations – Tutuka, Matla, Kriel and Duvha. Water is also transferred from Matla to Kendal power station. Usutu-Vaal consists of six pump stations. For the purpose of this article only Grootdraai (GD), Grootfontein (GF) and Rietfontein (RF) pump stations are considered. Water is pumped from the Grootdraai dam, both to Tutuka power station and through a 40 km canal to GF which is a booster pump station. GF in turn pumps water to both Sasol and, via Trichardt dam, to Rietfontein dam. New infrastructures were implemented to control the pumps and a new control philosophy was developed for the pump operational scheduling and for the management of the two pump stations in series. Due to the long distance of the canal, changes to the water flow at GD will take from 11 to 16 h before being detectable at GF. The new philosophy involves operating two pumps at both of these pump stations. The main objective of the demand side Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions Regarding the Impact of Ubuntu and Servant Leadership on Employee Engagement in the Workplace
    PERCEPTIONS REGARDING THE IMPACT OF UBUNTU AND SERVANT LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT IN THE WORKPLACE By ROGER MULLER (192035150) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY: BUSINESS MANAGEMENT to be awarded at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University April 2017 Supervisor: Prof E.E. Smith Co-supervisor: Dr R. Lillah ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the following people who contributed to making this study a success: • My supervisors: Prof Elroy Smith and Dr Riyaadh Lillah for their guidance, diligence, and inspiration. • My dear wife, Marilyn, for her unselfish support and encouragement, and for always inspiring me to keep on keeping on. I am because you are. • My daughters, Erin and Amy, for sacrificing family time when I was not available. Your interest, encouragement, and countless cups of coffee meant more to me than you will ever know. • To my loving parents, Henry and Elizabeth, for always being my biggest fans and supporters. • To my family and friends who always took an interest in my work and supported me throughout. • To the Old Apostolic Church, particularly Overseer McLean, for your spiritual guidance and understanding. • To my colleagues at NMMU for your words of encouragement and support. A particular mention needs to be made of Dr Jo Zeelie for the continued interest that he showed, and the resources he made available when they were most needed. • To the fieldworkers, Zack, Luyolo and Jessica, who tirelessly assisted with the distribution and collection of the questionnaires. • To the student assistants, Greg, Matthew and Natasha, for data capturing.
    [Show full text]