View PDF for This Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

View PDF for This Newsletter Marking 150 issues of the Newsletter Newsletter No. 150 March 2012 Price: $5.00 Australasian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 150 (March 2012) AUSTRALASIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Council President Vice President Peter Weston Dale Dixon National Herbarium of New South Wales National Herbarium of New South Wales Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Mrs Macquaries Road Mrs Macquaries Road Sydney, NSW 2000 Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia Australia Tel: +61 2 9231 8142 Tel: +61 2 9231 8171 Fax: +61 2 9251 7231 Fax: +61 2 9241 3892 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer John Clarkson Frank Zich Department of Environment and Natural Resources Australian Tropical Herbarium PO Box 156 E2 Building, J.C.U. Cairns Campus Mareeba, QLD 4880 PO Box 6811 Australia Cairns, Qld 4870 Tel: +61 7 4048 4745 Australia Fax: +61 7 4092 2366 Tel: +61 7 4059 5014 Email: [email protected] Fax: +61 7 4091 8888 Email: [email protected] C ouncillor (Assistant Secretary - Communications) Councillor (Assistant Treasurer) Ilse Breitwieser Pina Milne Allan Herbarium National Herbarium of Victoria Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd Royal Botanic Gardens PO Box 40 Birdwood Ave Lincoln 7640 South Yarra, VIC 3141 New Zealand Australia Tel: +64 3 321 9621 Tel: +61 3 9252 2309 Fax: +64 3 321 9998 Fax: +61 3 9252 2423 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Other Constitutional Bodies Public Officer Hansjörg Eichler Research Committee Annette Wilson Bill Barker Australian Biological Resources Study Philip Garnock-Jones GPO Box 787 Betsy Jackes Canberra, ACT 2601 Greg Leach Australia Nathalie Nagalingum Email: [email protected] Christopher Quinn Chair: Dale Dixon, Vice President Affiliate Society Grant application closing dates: Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Hansjörg Eichler Research Fund: on March 14th and September 14th each year. Australian Conservation Taxonomy Award: ASBS Website on March 14th 2012 and March 14th 2013 www.anbg.gov.au/asbs Murray Fagg Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Re- Cover image: Alloxylon flammeum (Proteaceae), search reproduced with the permission of Australian National Herbarium David Mackay (the artist) and RBG Sydney. Email: [email protected] Publication dates of previous issue Austral. Syst. Bot. Soc. Nsltr 149 (December 2011 issue) ASBS Web site: 9th February 2012 Australasian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 150 (March 2012) From the President It is time to welcome most members back from those who have something to say (and most summer holidays and in some cases to say “well of us have) will take the trouble to put their done” for recently finishing and submitting thoughts on paper and send them to the applications to granting bodies. This message Society or the Editor. is especially aimed at those research students I think that Australian plant systematists who submitted applications to the Hansjoerg subsequently supported the newsletter Eichler Scientific Research Fund and/or for the handsomely by submitting articles much more Australian Conservation Taxonomy Award on enthusiastically than Everist had foreseen. or before 14 March. However, his comments got me thinking about A landmark for the ASBS Newsletter the role the newsletter now plays as a forum This issue of the Newsletter marks a special for the critical evaluation of publications anniversary, being issue number 150, a nice in our field. It does fulfil this function well round number. Our newsletter has come a through the book reviews section, a part of the long way since publication of the first issue Newsletter that is really flourishing thanks to back in March 1974, following foundation of John Clarkson’s enthusiastic pursuit of both the society in August 1973. ASBS Newsletter publishers and willing reviewers. However, it number 1 was a mimeographed document of seems to me that Australasian plant systematists 14 foolscap pages that were held together by disagree with each other’s opinions and a staple in the upper left hand corner. It looks conclusions to a much greater extent than an quaint and old-fashioned compared to issue innocent reader would gather from reading 150 but it makes fascinating reading for anyone the ASBS Newsletter. It would be great if the familiar with the personalities and questions newsletter hosted an opinion page even half as that dominated Australian plant systematics at vigorous as the “points of view” section that the time. Selwyn Everist, then Director of the made Systematic Zoology such compelling Queensland Herbarium, wrote the first article, reading back in the 1970’s. setting out the kind of material he thought the Our next conference in Perth newsletter ought to publish. He saw it as Members who visit the ASBS website often A medium for expressing ideas and opinions: will have noticed the announcement there of on such matters as disciplines involved in the next ASBS conference, to be held in Perth, making taxonomic judgements and for at the University Club of Western Australia notification of and comments on published and Western Australian Conservation Science work. Centre from 23 to 26 September 2012 (see Everist went on to pointedly note that: www.anbg.gov.au/asbs/conferences.html). Unlike fairy godmothers, editors are unable The conference has its own web site (www. to conjure up articles out of thin air, although asbs2012perth.com), which will have been sometimes they are forced to try. The value linked to the ASBS conference page by the time of this Newsletter will depend on whether you read this. The theme of the conference, Australasian Systematic Botany Society Inc. Council Elections In accordance with the Society’s Rules, nominations are hereby called for positions on the Council for the 2012–13 term of office. Council consists of the following positions: President, Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer and two (2) Councillors. Note: Nominations must be received by the Secretary, John Clarkson, PO Box 156, Mareeba, Qld before 5 pm Tuesday 31st July. Nomination forms are on the ASBS Website www.anbg.gov.au/asbs. 1 Australasian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 150 (March 2012) “Local knowledge, global delivery”, was Meeting to be held at the National Herbarium prompted by the radical changes that were of New South Wales in Sydney on Tuesday 3 made to the nomenclatural code (including its July, at which the proposed rule changes will name) at last year’s International Botanical be discussed, and if the meeting so decides, Congress in Melbourne. The organisers see modified. Please read my article elsewhere in these innovations as heralding a new era in this newsletter discussing these proposals and which systematists will increasingly become arguing why such changes to our rules are immersed in biodiversity informatics, web- necessary. based collaborations, electronic publishing and Another important matter on the AGM agenda eFloras. Presentations and posters dealing with is of course the election of members of ASBS these areas as well as any other current work Council. I will be retiring as president at this in Australasian plant systematics, particularly meeting, having served the maximum three local endemism, pollination and biodiversity year term allowed by our constitution. Vice threats, are welcomed. The conference will President Dale Dixon will be ineligible to step be followed by a two day guided field trip to into my shoes because he will have served the Lesueur National Park, a significant centre maximum six year term allowed as a Council of endemism within one of the world’s most member. So, we need at least two ASBS spectacular biodiversity hotspots. It is time to members who are interested in nominating start organising ourselves to participate in this for the leadership positions of President and important meeting at a botanically exciting Vice President. I strongly encourage aspiring venue. nominees to discuss these roles with me or Our next AGM other members of Council. We are particularly On the afternoon of Tuesday 25 September, the interested in receiving nominations for the society’s Annual General Meeting will be held position of President from members who have at the University Club of Western Australia. previous experience on Council. Nominations This meeting will deal with several important for positions on ASBS Council are due by 25 matters. One of these will be the determination May 2012. of special resolutions to change the society’s Peter Weston rules. This vote will follow an earlier General ASBS Inc. business Proposed ASBS Rule Changes 2012 I am in receipt of a letter dated 29 February Voting mail out, then determination at AGM 2012, signed by 4 financial members of the in Perth on 25th September Australasian Systematic Botany Society Inc., in The proposals, unless withdrawn, with any which a number of changes to the Rules of the modifications, will be sent to all members by 1st Society are proposed. August 2012 together with appropriate voting Special General Meeting on 3rd July in papers. These voting papers should be returned Sydney to the Secretary by midnight (EST) on 5th September 2012 or presented with unchanged Pursuant to Rule 34 of the Society, I am directed particulars to the Secretary at the annual general by Council to advise you that a general meeting meeting of the Society to be held on Tuesday of the Society will be held on Tuesday 3rd July 25th September 2012 at the University Club 2012 in the Caley Room, National Herbarium of Western Australia, Hackett Drive, Crawley, of New South Wales, Mrs Macquaries Road, WA beginning at 4:00 pm (WST). The special Sydney, NSW beginning at 12:00 pm (EST). At resolution will be determined at this meeting. this meeting the proposals, which are attached, will be will be placed on the agenda to be dealt A full explanation follows in this Newsletter.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix Color Plates of Solanales Species
    Appendix Color Plates of Solanales Species The first half of the color plates (Plates 1–8) shows a selection of phytochemically prominent solanaceous species, the second half (Plates 9–16) a selection of convol- vulaceous counterparts. The scientific name of the species in bold (for authorities see text and tables) may be followed (in brackets) by a frequently used though invalid synonym and/or a common name if existent. The next information refers to the habitus, origin/natural distribution, and – if applicable – cultivation. If more than one photograph is shown for a certain species there will be explanations for each of them. Finally, section numbers of the phytochemical Chapters 3–8 are given, where the respective species are discussed. The individually combined occurrence of sec- ondary metabolites from different structural classes characterizes every species. However, it has to be remembered that a small number of citations does not neces- sarily indicate a poorer secondary metabolism in a respective species compared with others; this may just be due to less studies being carried out. Solanaceae Plate 1a Anthocercis littorea (yellow tailflower): erect or rarely sprawling shrub (to 3 m); W- and SW-Australia; Sects. 3.1 / 3.4 Plate 1b, c Atropa belladonna (deadly nightshade): erect herbaceous perennial plant (to 1.5 m); Europe to central Asia (naturalized: N-USA; cultivated as a medicinal plant); b fruiting twig; c flowers, unripe (green) and ripe (black) berries; Sects. 3.1 / 3.3.2 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 6.5.2 / 7.5.1 / 7.7.2 / 7.7.4.3 Plate 1d Brugmansia versicolor (angel’s trumpet): shrub or small tree (to 5 m); tropical parts of Ecuador west of the Andes (cultivated as an ornamental in tropical and subtropical regions); Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Loranthaceae1
    Flora of South Australia 5th Edition | Edited by Jürgen Kellermann LORANTHACEAE1 P.J. Lang2 & B.A. Barlow3 Aerial hemi-parasitic shrubs on branches of woody plants attached by haustoria; leaves mostly opposite, entire. Inflorescence terminal or lateral; flowers bisexual; calyx reduced to an entire, lobed or toothed limb at the apex of the ovary, without vascular bundles; corolla free or fused, regular or slightly zygomorphic, 4–6-merous, valvate; stamens as many as and opposite the petals, epipetalous, anthers 2- or 4-locular, mostly basifixed, immobile, introrse and continuous with the filament but sometimes dorsifixed and then usually versatile, opening by longitudinal slits; pollen trilobate; ovary inferior, without differentiated locules or ovules. Fruit berry-like; seed single, surrounded by a copious viscous layer. Mistletoes. 73 genera and around 950 species widely distributed in the tropics and south temperate regions with a few species in temperate Asia and Europe. Australia has 12 genera (6 endemic) and 75 species. Reference: Barlow (1966, 1984, 1996), Nickrent et al. (2010), Watson (2011). 1. Petals free 2. Anthers basifixed, immobile, introrse; inflorescence axillary 3. Inflorescence not subtended by enlarged bracts more than 20 mm long ....................................... 1. Amyema 3: Inflorescence subtended by enlarged bracts more than 20 mm long which enclose the buds prior to anthesis ......................................................................................................................... 2. Diplatia 2: Anthers dorsifixed, versatile; inflorescence terminal ........................................................................... 4. Muellerina 1: Petals united into a curved tube, more deeply divided on the concave side ................................................ 3. Lysiana 1. AMYEMA Tiegh. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 41: 499 (1894). (Greek a-, negative; myeo, I instruct, initiate; referring to the genus being not previously recognised; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Ammobia Maconochie
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia ammobia Maconochie Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin J. & M. Simmons Source: Australian Plant Image Index Image courtesy of Northern Territory Herbarium (dig.32650). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2014 Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Image courtesy of Northern Territory Herbarium Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Image courtesy of Northern Territory Herbarium Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.32646). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2014 Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.32648). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2014 Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.32647). (dig.32649). (dig.32651). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2014 ANBG © M. Fagg, 2014 ANBG © M. Fagg, 2014 Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Image courtesy of Northern Territory Herbarium Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin J. & M. Simmons Acacia ammobia occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Common Name Mt Conner Wattle Family Fabaceae Distribution Occurs in south-western N.T., from 130 km W to 50 km E of Uluru, and in north-western S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Floral Presentation and Bee-Pollination in Two Sprengelia Species (Ericaceae)
    Comparative floral presentation and bee-pollination in two Sprengelia species (Ericaceae) Karen A. Johnson* and Peter B. McQuillan School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Pollination by sonication is unusual in the Styphelioideae, family Ericaceae. Sprengelia incarnata and Sprengelia propinqua have floral characteristics that suggested they might be adapted to buzz pollination.Both species have florally similar nectarless flowers except that the stamens ofSprengelia propinqua spread widely after the flower opens, while those of Sprengelia incarnata cohere in the centre of the flower. To test whether sonication occurs, we observed bee behaviour at the flowers of both plant species, documented potential pollinators, and examined their floral and pollen attributes. We found that Sprengelia incarnata had smaller and drier pollen than Sprengelia propinqua. We found that Sprengelia incarnata was sonicated by native bees in the families Apidae (Exoneura), Halictidae (Lasioglossum) and Colletidae (Leioproctus, Euryglossa). Sprengelia propinqua was also visited by bees from the Apidae (Exoneura) and Halictidae (Lasioglossum), but pollen was collected by scraping. The introduced Apis mellifera (Apidae) foraged at Sprengelia propinqua but ignored Sprengelia incarnata. The two Sprengelia species shared some genera of potential pollinators, but appeared to have diverged enough in their floral and pollen characters to elicit different behaviours from the native and introduced bees. Cunninghamia (2011) 12 (1): 45–51 Introduction species, some Leucopogon species, Richea milliganii (Hook.f.) F.Muell., and Sprengelia incarnata Sm. (Houston The interactions between plants and pollinators are thought & Ladd, 2002; Ladd, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices, Glossary and Index
    7 Appendices Appendix A: Agency resourcing statement 2010–11 Appendix B: Portfolio Budget Statements reporting 2010–11 Appendix C: Ecologically sustainable development and environmental performance Appendix D: Freedom of information statement Appendix E: Compliance index Christmas Island red crabs. Photo: Parks Australia Appendix A: Agency Resourcing Statement 2010–11 The Agency Resourcing Statement was introduced to Portfolio Budget Statements in 2008–09 to provide information about the various funding sources that the Director of National Parks may draw upon during the year. The Director of National Parks is required to publish the Agency Resourcing Statement in the annual report that reconciles to cash reserves in the financial statements. Actual available Payments Balance appropriation Made Remaining $’000 $’000 $’000 Opening balance/Reserves at bank 38,353 – 38,353 REVENUE FROM GOVERNMENT Ordinary annual services¹ Outcome 1 – – – Total ordinary annual services – – – Other services² Non-operating 2,249 – 2,249 Total other services 2,249 – 2,249 Total annual appropriations 2,249 – 2,249 Payments from related entities3 Amounts from the portfolio department 46,444 46,444 (0) Total 46,444 46,444 (0) Total funds from Government 46,444 46,444 (0) FUNDS FROM OTHER SOURCES Interest 1,575 1,575 – Sale of goods and services 15,486 15,486 – Other 2,328 1,390 938 Total 19,389 18,451 938 Total net resourcing for DNP 106,435 64,895 41,540 All figures are GST exclusive As per the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Section 514S, DSEWPaC is directly appropriated the Director of National Parks (DNP) appropriations, which is then allocated to the DNP by the Secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids
    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT 25/10/90; Plant List Updated Oct. 1992; Notes Added June 2021
    DRAFT 25/10/90; plant list updated Oct. 1992; notes added June 2021. PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION VALUES OF OPEN COUNTRY PADDOCK, BOOLARDY STATION Allan H. Burbidge and J.K. Rolfe INTRODUCTION Boolardy Station is situated about 150 km north of Yalgoo and 140 km west-north-west of Cue, in the Shire of Murchison, Western Australia. Open Country Paddock (about 16 000 ha) is in the south-east corner of the station, at 27o05'S, 116o50'E. The most prominent named feature is Coolamooka Hill, near the eastern boundary of the paddock. There are no conservation reserves in this region, although there are some small reserves set aside for various other purposes. Previous biological data for the station consist of broad scale vegetation mapping and land system mapping. Beard (1976) mapped the entire Murchison region at 1: 1 000 000. The Open Country Paddock area was mapped as supporting mulga woodlands and shrublands. More detailed mapping of land system units for rangeland assessment purposes has been carried out more recently at a scale of 1: 40 000 (Payne and Curry in prep.). Seven land systems were identified in open Country Paddock (Fig. 1). Apart from these studies, no detailed biological survey work appears to have been done in the area. Open Country Paddock has been only lightly grazed by domestic stock because of the presence of Kite-leaf Poison (Gastrolobium laytonii) and a lack of fresh water. Because of this and the generally good condition of the paddock and presence of a wide range of plant species, P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of the Solanaceae
    TAXON 57 (4) • November 2008: 1159–1181 Olmstead & al. • Molecular phylogeny of Solanaceae MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae Richard G. Olmstead1*, Lynn Bohs2, Hala Abdel Migid1,3, Eugenio Santiago-Valentin1,4, Vicente F. Garcia1,5 & Sarah M. Collier1,6 1 Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A. *olmstead@ u.washington.edu (author for correspondence) 2 Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, U.S.A. 3 Present address: Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt 4 Present address: Jardin Botanico de Puerto Rico, Universidad de Puerto Rico, Apartado Postal 364984, San Juan 00936, Puerto Rico 5 Present address: Department of Integrative Biology, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. 6 Present address: Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, U.S.A. A phylogeny of Solanaceae is presented based on the chloroplast DNA regions ndhF and trnLF. With 89 genera and 190 species included, this represents a nearly comprehensive genus-level sampling and provides a framework phylogeny for the entire family that helps integrate many previously-published phylogenetic studies within So- lanaceae. The four genera comprising the family Goetzeaceae and the monotypic families Duckeodendraceae, Nolanaceae, and Sclerophylaceae, often recognized in traditional classifications, are shown to be included in Solanaceae. The current results corroborate previous studies that identify a monophyletic subfamily Solanoideae and the more inclusive “x = 12” clade, which includes Nicotiana and the Australian tribe Anthocercideae. These results also provide greater resolution among lineages within Solanoideae, confirming Jaltomata as sister to Solanum and identifying a clade comprised primarily of tribes Capsiceae (Capsicum and Lycianthes) and Physaleae.
    [Show full text]
  • Blair's Rainforest Inventory
    Enoggera creek (Herston/Wilston) rainforest inventory Prepared by Blair Bartholomew 28-Jan-02 Botanical Name Common Name: tree, shrub, Derivation (Pronunciation) vine, timber 1. Acacia aulacocarpa Brown salwood, hickory/brush Acacia from Greek ”akakia (A), hê”, the shittah tree, Acacia arabica; (changed to Acacia ironbark/broad-leaved/black/grey which is derived from the Greek “akanth-a [a^k], ês, hê, (akê A)” a thorn disparrima ) wattle, gugarkill or prickle (alluding to the spines on the many African and Asian species first described); aulacocarpa from Greek “aulac” furrow and “karpos” a fruit, referring to the characteristic thickened transverse bands on the a-KAY-she-a pod. Disparrima from Latin “disparrima”, the most unlike, dissimilar, different or unequal referring to the species exhibiting the greatest difference from other renamed species previously described as A aulacocarpa. 2. Acacia melanoxylon Black wood/acacia/sally, light Melanoxylon from Greek “mela_s” black or dark: and “xulon” wood, cut wood, hickory, silver/sally/black- and ready for use, or tree, referring to the dark timber of this species. hearted wattle, mudgerabah, mootchong, Australian blackwood, native ash, bastard myall 3. Acmena hemilampra Broad-leaved lillypilly, blush satin Acmena from Greek “Acmenae” the nymphs of Venus who were very ash, water gum, cassowary gum beautiful, referring to the attractive flowers and fruits. A second source says that Acmena was a nymph dedicated to Venus. This derivation ac-ME-na seems the most likely. Finally another source says that the name is derived from the Latin “Acmena” one of the names of the goddess Venus. Hemilampra from Greek “hemi” half and “lampro”, bright, lustrous or shining, referring to the glossy upper leaf surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Leucopogon Sp. Flynn (F
    Short form Threatened species nomination form (Version Mar 2016) Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form For nominations/assessments under the Common Assessment Method (CAM) where supporting information is available, but not in a format suitable for demonstrating compliance with the CAM, and assessment against the IUCN Red List threat status. Cover Page (Office use only for Assessment) Species name (scientific and common name): Leucopogon sp. Flynn (F. Hort, J. Hort & A. Lowrie) Nomination for (addition, deletion, change): Addition Nominated conservation category and criteria: CR: B1ab(iii,v)+B2ab(iii,v) Scientific committee assessment of eligibility against the criteria: This assessment is consistent with the standards set out in Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and Yes No 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding. A. Population size reduction B. Geographic range C. Small population size and decline D. Very small or restricted population E. Quantitative analysis Outcome: Scientific committee Meeting date: Scientific committee comments: Recommendation: Ministerial approval: Date of Gazettal/ Legislative effect: Page 1 of 7 Nomination/Proposal summary (to be completed by nominator) Current conservation status Scientific name: Leucopogon sp. Flynn (F. Hort, J. Hort & A. Lowrie) Common name: None Family name: Ericaceae Fauna Flora Nomination for: Listing Change of status/criteria Delisting 1. Is the species currently on any conservation list, either in a State or Territory, Australia or Internationally? Provide details of the occurrence and listing status for each jurisdiction in the following table 2. Is it present in an Australian jurisdiction, but not listed? State / Territory in Date listed or Listing category i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Placement of Ivodea and Biogeographic Affinities Of
    Plant Systematics and Evolution (2020) 306:7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01633-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Phylogenetic placement of Ivodea and biogeographic afnities of Malagasy Rutaceae Marc S. Appelhans1,2 · Jun Wen2 Received: 6 December 2018 / Accepted: 8 January 2020 / Published online: 1 February 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract The genus Ivodea is endemic to Madagascar and the Comoros and consists of 30 species. This study is the frst to include the genus in a molecular phylogenetic analysis. We sequenced the plastid trnL–trnF and the nuclear ITS regions for three Ivodea species and revealed that the genus is monophyletic and most closely related to the African and Malagasy Vepris, refuting earlier suggestions of a close relationship between Ivodea and the Asian, Malesian, Australasian and Pacifc genera Euodia and Melicope. Ivodea and Vepris provide another example of closely related pairs of Rutaceous groups that have drupaceous and capsular/follicular fruits, respectively, thus further confrming that fruit types are not suited to delimit sub- families in Rutaceae, as has often been done in the past. Ivodea was the last of the seven Malagasy genera to be included in the Rutaceae phylogeny, making it possible to conduct an assessment of biogeographic afnities of the genera that occur on the island. Our assessments based on sister-group relationships suggest that the eight lineages (representing seven genera) of Malagasy Rutaceae either have African or have Asian afnities. Two lineages have an African origin, and one lineage has an Asian origin. Taxon sampling is insufcient to interpret the directionality of dispersal events in the remaining lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]