DOCSLIB.ORG

Industry-Biosecurity-Plan-For-The-Potato-Industry V3.2.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Industry-Biosecurity-Plan-For-The-Potato-Industry V3.2.Pdf Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2021 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2021) Biosecurity Plan for the Potato Industry (Version 3.2 – 2021) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the potato research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific and independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Acknowledgements The Biosecurity Plan for the Potato Industry was coordinated by Plant Health Australia and developed through a partnership approach with government and industry. The following organisations and agencies were involved in the development and finalisation of the plan: Endorsement The Biosecurity Plan for the Potato Industry (Version 3.0) was formally endorsed by the Potato industry (through AUSVEG) in January 2018, and all state and territory governments (through the Plant Health Committee) in December 2018. The Australian Government endorses the document without prejudice for the purposes of industry’s planning needs and meeting the Department’s obligations under Clause 13 of the EPPRD. In providing this endorsement the Department notes page 66 of the Plan which states: “This Document considers all potential pathways by which a pest might enter Australia, including natural and assisted spread (including smuggling). This is a broader view of potential risk than the IRA conducted by the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources which focus only on specific regulated import pathways.” Reporting suspect pests Any unusual plant pest should be reported immediately to the relevant state/territory agriculture department through the Exotic Plant Pest Hotline (1800 084 881). Early reporting enhances the chance of effective control and eradication. Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 11 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 12 SIGNIFICANT BIOSECURITY THREATS ............................................................................... 14 Document overview ............................................................................................................... 15 High priority exotic pests, established pests and weeds of biosecurity significance ......... 15 Implementing biosecurity for the Australian Potato Industry 2017-2022 ........................... 15 Threat identification and pest risk assessments ................................................................ 16 Risk mitigation and preparedness ...................................................................................... 16 Response management ..................................................................................................... 16 Pests and Weeds of Biosecurity Significance Overview ....................................................... 17 Potato industry high priority exotic pests ............................................................................ 18 Established pests of biosecurity significance ..................................................................... 24 Established weeds of biosecurity significance ................................................................... 32 Implementing biosecurity for the Australian potato industry 2017-2022 ............................... 37 Strategy: Capacity and Capability ...................................................................................... 38 Strategy: Plant Biosecurity Education and Awareness ...................................................... 39 Strategy: Preparedness and Response ............................................................................. 42 Strategy: Surveillance ........................................................................................................ 44 Strategy: Diagnostics ......................................................................................................... 46 Strategy: Established Pests and Weeds ............................................................................ 48 Strategy: Biosecurity Research, Development and Extension (RD&E) ............................. 49 Strategy: Legislative and Regulatory Issues of Importance ............................................... 50 Australian Potato industry - biosecurity preparedness ....................................................... 51 AUSVEG industry biosecurity statement ............................................................................ 55 NATIONAL BIOSECURITY SYSTEM ...................................................................................... 56 What is biosecurity and why is it important? ......................................................................... 57 The plant biosecurity system in Australia .............................................................................. 57 Potato Peak Industry Body ................................................................................................. 58 Plant Health Australia ......................................................................................................... 58 The Biosecurity Plan .............................................................................................................. 59 Biosecurity planning ........................................................................................................... 59 Biosecurity Plan development ............................................................................................ 60 Review processes .............................................................................................................. 62 THREAT IDENTIFICATION AND PEST RISK ASSESSMENTS ............................................ 63 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 64 Exotic pests of the potato industry......................................................................................... 64 Threat identification ............................................................................................................ 64 Pest risk assessments ........................................................................................................ 65 Ranking pest threats .......................................................................................................... 66 Description of terms used in pest risk tables ...................................................................... 67 RISK MITIGATION AND PREPAREDNESS ........................................................................... 70 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 71 Barrier quarantine .................................................................................................................. 72 National level – importation restrictions ............................................................................. 72 State and regional level – movement restrictions .............................................................. 74 Farm level – exclusion activities ......................................................................................... 78 Surveillance ........................................................................................................................... 78 National surveillance programs .......................................................................................... 79 State surveillance programs ............................................................................................... 80 Farm surveillance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only.
    [Show full text]
  • NPV Dissertação (2008).Pdf (4.051Mb)
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ Setor de Ciências Exatas – Departamento de Química Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química Alcalóides Esteroidais dos Frutos Maduros de Solanum caavurana Vell. Mestranda: Nelissa Pacheco Vaz Orientadora: Profª. Drª. Beatriz Helena L. de N. Sales Maia Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química, para obtenção do Título de Mestre em Ciências, área de concentração Química Orgânica. Curitiba-PR Janeiro 2008 “A química é talvez a ciência que mais necessita de amigos. Para fazê-los, tê-los e mantê-los basta a humildade de perceber que você nunca vai conseguir saber tudo de química e que eles sempre poderão lhe ensinar alguma coisa.” (Flávio Leite) ii AGRADECIMENTOS: U A Deus pela vida e oportunidade de adquirir conhecimento superior de qualidade numa sociedade tão desigual; U À minha família por acreditarem, apoiarem, incentivarem e terem investido tempo, amor e dedicação para a realização dos meus sonhos. Agradeço também pela compreensão e convivência; U A Universidade Federal do Paraná e ao Departamento de Química desta universidade pela oportunidade de realização deste trabalho; U À professora Drª. Beatriz Helena Lameiro de Noronha Sales Maia pela orientação, amizade, compreensão, presença, motivação e auxílio durante a realização deste trabalho; U À professora Drª. Raquel Marques Braga - Instituto de Química - Universidade de Campinas (IQ - UNICAMP) pelas análises de ressonância magnética nuclear e auxílios nas determinações estruturais; U Ao professor Dr. Norberto Peporine Lopes - Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo: Departamento de Física e Química – (FCFRP-USP) pela aquisição dos Espectros de Massas; U Aos biólogos Drª.
    [Show full text]
  • A Faunal Survey of the Elateroidea of Montana by Catherine Elaine
    A faunal survey of the elateroidea of Montana by Catherine Elaine Seibert A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology Montana State University © Copyright by Catherine Elaine Seibert (1993) Abstract: The beetle family Elateridae is a large and taxonomically difficult group of insects that includes many economically important species of cultivated crops. Elaterid larvae, or wireworms, have a history of damaging small grains in Montana. Although chemical seed treatments have controlled wireworm damage since the early 1950's, it is- highly probable that their availability will become limited, if not completely unavailable, in the near future. In that event, information about Montana's elaterid fauna, particularity which species are present and where, will be necessary for renewed research efforts directed at wireworm management. A faunal survey of the superfamily Elateroidea, including the Elateridae and three closely related families, was undertaken to determine the species composition and distribution in Montana. Because elateroid larvae are difficult to collect and identify, the survey concentrated exclusively on adult beetles. This effort involved both the collection of Montana elateroids from the field and extensive borrowing of the same from museum sources. Results from the survey identified one artematopid, 152 elaterid, six throscid, and seven eucnemid species from Montana. County distributions for each species were mapped. In addition, dichotomous keys, and taxonomic and biological information, were compiled for various taxa. Species of potential economic importance were also noted, along with their host plants. Although the knowledge of the superfamily' has been improved significantly, it is not complete.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Thrips Palmi</I>
    ISPM 27 27 ANNEX 1 ENG DP 1: Thrips palmi Karny INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY FOR STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS Produced by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) This page is intentionally left blank This diagnostic protocol was adopted by the Fifth Session of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in March 2010. The annex is a prescriptive part of ISPM 27. ISPM 27 Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests DP 1: Thrips palmi Karny Adopted 2010; published 2016 CONTENTS 1. Pest Information .............................................................................................................................2 2. Taxonomic Information .................................................................................................................3 3. Detection ........................................................................................................................................3 4. Identification ..................................................................................................................................4 4.1 Morphological identification of the adult thrips ..................................................................5 4.1.1 Preparation of thrips for microscopic examination ..............................................................5 4.1.2 Identification of the family Thripidae ..................................................................................5 4.1.3 Identification of the genus Thrips ........................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Teplate
    Volume-03 ISSN: 2455-3085 (Online) Issue-12 RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary December -2018 www.rrjournals.com [UGC Listed Journal] Biology of acridid grasshopper, Chrotogonus trachypterus Blanchard -A review Shashi Meena Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur (India) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Grasshoppers are abundant and most diverse group of was studied by various workers [1, 17]. Observations were also insects worldwide. They are ployphagous in nature and made on population density, seasonal history and number of become voracious foliage feeder when occupying maximum generations, food preferences, development on different food population density [29, 30]. Grasshoppers, belong to family plants, nature and extent of damage caused by C. trachypterus ‘Acrididae’, order Orthoptera, feed voraciously on green plants in Punjab [6]. Patterns of variation in external morphology, and vegetation, throughout India and other parts of the world biology and ecology of immature and adults of C. trachypterus and cause severe damage. They consume considerable was also illustrated [5, 11, 12]. amount of foliage during their nymphal stage and damage millets, vegetables, cereal, citrus and ornamental plants. The eggs of acridids in general are slightly curved in the Migratory grasshoppers can also attack on other shrubs and middle and blunt at the ends and are enclosed in a frothy plants and consume all parts of them [14]. secretion of accessory glands and laid eggs at a depth of 4.81± 0.09 cm [9, 13, 32, 33, 34]. C. trachypterus on an Surface grasshopper, Chrotogonus trachypterus average laid 71.10±24.54 eggs. The highest fertility of eggs Blanchard is a polyphagous pest and occurs through the year was observed at fluctuating temperature but in contrast C.
    [Show full text]
  • FURY 10 EW Active Substance: Zeta-Cypermethrin 100 G/L COUNTRY
    Part A Product name Registration Report –Central Zone National Assessment - FURY 10 EW Page 1 of 27 Federal Republic of Germany 024222-00/01 REGISTRATION REPORT Part A Risk Management Product name: FURY 10 EW Active Substance: zeta-cypermethrin 100 g/L COUNTRY: Germany Central Zone Zonal Rapporteur Member State: Germany NATIONAL ASSESSMENT Applicant: Cheminova Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG Submission Date: 02/01/2014 Date: 17/08/2018 Applicant (Cheminova Deutschland GmbH) Evaluator BVL / DE Date: 17/09/ 2018 Part A Product name Registration Report –Central Zone National Assessment - FURY 10 EW Page 2 of 27 Federal Republic of Germany 024222-00/01 Table of Contents PART A – Risk Management 4 1 Details of the application 4 1.1 Application background 4 1.2 Annex I inclusion 4 1.3 Regulatory approach 5 2 Details of the authorisation 6 2.1 Product identity 6 2.2 Classification and labelling 6 2.3.2.2 Specific restrictions linked to the intended uses 9 2.3 Product uses 10 3 Risk management 12 3.1 Reasoned statement of the overall conclusions taken in accordance with the Uniform Principles 12 3.1.1 Physical and chemical properties (Part B, Section 1, Points 2 and 4) 12 3.1.2 Methods of analysis (Part B, Section 2, Point 5) 12 3.1.2.1 Analytical method for the formulation (Part B, Section 2, Point 5.2) 12 3.1.2.2 Analytical methods for residues (Part B, Section 2, Points 5.3 – 5.8) 12 3.1.3 Mammalian Toxicology (Part B, Section 3, Point 7) 12 The PPP is already registered in Germany according to Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List
    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRUE ARMY ANTS of the INDO-AUSTRALIAN AREA (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dorylinae)
    Pacific Insects 6 (3) : 427483 November 10, 1964 THE TRUE ARMY ANTS OF THE INDO-AUSTRALIAN AREA (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dorylinae) By Edward O. Wilson BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES, HARVARD UNIVERSITY, CAMBRIDGE, MASS., U. S. A. Abstract: All of the known Indo-Australian species of Dorylinae, 4 in Dorylus and 34 in Aenictus, are included in this revision. Eight of the Aenictus species are described as new: artipus, chapmani, doryloides, exilis, huonicus, nganduensis, philiporum and schneirlai. Phylo­ genetic and numerical analyses resulted in the discarding of two extant subgenera of Aenictus (Typhlatta and Paraenictus) and the loose clustering of the species into 5 informal " groups" within the unified genus Aenictus. A consistency test for phylogenetic characters is discussed. The African and Indo-Australian doryline species are compared, and available information in the biology of the Indo-Australian species is summarized. The " true " army ants are defined here as equivalent to the subfamily Dorylinae. Not included are species of Ponerinae which have developed legionary behavior independently (see Wilson, E. O., 1958, Evolution 12: 24-31) or the subfamily Leptanillinae, which is very distinct and may be independent in origin. The Dorylinae are not as well developed in the Indo-Australian area as in Africa and the New World tropics. Dorylus itself, which includes the famous driver ants, is centered in Africa and sends only four species into tropical Asia. Of these, the most widespread reaches only to Java and the Celebes. Aenictus, on the other hand, is at least as strongly developed in tropical Asia and New Guinea as it is in Africa, with 34 species being known from the former regions and only about 15 from Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum'
    EPPO Datasheet: 'Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum' Last updated: 2020-04-22 Only Solanaceae haplotypes of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ are included in the EPPO A1 List. IDENTITY Preferred name: 'Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum' Authority: Liefting, Perez-Egusquiza & Clover Taxonomic position: Bacteria: Proteobacteria: Alphaproteobacteria: Rhizobiales: Phyllobacteriaceae Other scientific names: Liberibacter psyllaurous Hansen,Trumble, Stouthamer & Paine, Liberibacter solanacearum Liefting, Perez- Egusquiza & Clover Common names: zebra chip disease view more common names online... EPPO Categorization: A1 list more photos... view more categorizations online... EU Categorization: RNQP (Annex IV) EPPO Code: LIBEPS Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature This bacterium was first described from solanaceous plants and psyllids, almost simultaneously in New Zealand and the USA. The name ‘Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous (Hansen et al., 2008) was initially proposed, but ‘ Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ (Liefting et al., 2009c) was finally retained as the validly published name. Until now, ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’ has not been cultivated in axenic medium to allow the Koch’s postulates to be verified, hence its ‘Candidatus’ status. The bacterium is genetically diverse and ten haplotypes of ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’ have been described (Nelson et al., 2011, 2013; Teresani et al., 2014; Swisher Grimm and Garczynski, 2019; Haapalainen et al., 2018b; Mauck et al., 2019; Haapalainen et al., 2019; Contreras-Rendón et al., 2019). These haplotypes also differ in their host ranges, psyllid vectors and geographical distributions. In particular, four haplotypes (A, B, F and G) are associated with diseases of potatoes and other solanaceous plants, whereas four others (C, D, E and H-European) are associated with diseases of carrots and other apiaceous crops. Haplotype H European was also described in plants of the family Polygonaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Key of Pyrgomorphidae (Orthoptera: Caelifera) of the Indian Subcontinent Region
    Zootaxa 4895 (3): 381–397 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4895.3.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EDD13FF7-E045-4D13-A865-55682DC13C61 An Illustrated Key of Pyrgomorphidae (Orthoptera: Caelifera) of the Indian Subcontinent Region SUNDUS ZAHID1,2,5, RICARDO MARIÑO-PÉREZ2,4, SARDAR AZHAR AMEHMOOD1,6, KUSHI MUHAMMAD3 & HOJUN SONG2* 1Department of Zoology, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan 2Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA 3Department of Genetics, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4425-4742 4Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0566-1372 5 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-3459 6 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-9271 *Corresponding author. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6115-0473 Abstract The Indian subcontinent is known to harbor a high level of insect biodiversity and endemism, but the grasshopper fauna in this region is poorly understood, in part due to the lack of appropriate taxonomic resources. Based on detailed examinations of museum specimens and high-resolution digital images, we have produced an illustrated key to 21 Pyrgomorphidae genera known from the Indian subcontinent. This new identification key will become a useful tool for increasing our knowledge on the taxonomy of grasshoppers in this important biogeographic region. Key words: dichotomous key, gaudy grasshoppers, taxonomy Introduction The Indian subcontinent is known to harbor a high level of insect biodiversity and endemism (Ghosh 1996), but is also one of the most poorly studied regions in terms of biodiversity discovery (Song 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    ASIAN MYRMECOLOGY Volume 8, 17 – 48, 2016 ISSN 1985-1944 © Weeyawat Jaitrong, Benoit Guénard, Evan P. Economo, DOI: 10.20362/am.008019 Nopparat Buddhakala and Seiki Yamane A checklist of known ant species of Laos (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Weeyawat Jaitrong1, Benoit Guénard2, Evan P. Economo3, Nopparat Buddhakala4 and Seiki Yamane5* 1 Thailand Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Technopolis, Khlong 5, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120 Thailand E-mail: [email protected] 2 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China 3 Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan 4 Biology Divisions, Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajamangala Univer- sity of Technology Tanyaburi, Pathum Thani 12120 Thailand E-mail: [email protected] 5 Kagoshima University Museum, Korimoto 1-21-30, Kagoshima-shi, 890-0065 Japan *Corresponding author’s email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Laos is one of the most undersampled areas for ant biodiversity. We begin to address this knowledge gap by presenting the first checklist of Laotian ants. The list is based on a literature review and on specimens col- lected from several localities in Laos. In total, 123 species with three additional subspecies in 47 genera belonging to nine subfamilies are listed, including 62 species recorded for the first time in the country. Comparisons with neighboring countries suggest that this list is still very incomplete. The provincial distribu- tion of ants within Laos also show that most species recorded are from Vien- tiane Province, the central part of Laos while the majority of other provinces have received very little, if any, ant sampling.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrgomorphidae: Orthoptera
    International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies 2013; 1 (1): 29-33 Some short-horn Grasshoppers Belonging to the ISSN 2347-2677 IJFBS 2013; 1 (1): 29-33 Subfamily Pyrgomorphinae (Pyrgomorphidae: © 2013 AkiNik Publications Orthoptera) from Cameroon Received: 20-9-2013 Accepted: 27-9-2013 SEINO Richard Akwanjoh, DONGMO Tonleu Ingrid, MANJELI Yacouba ABSTRACT This study includes six Pyrgomorphinae species in six genera under the family Pyrgomorphidae. These grasshoppers: Atractomorpha lata (Mochulsky, 1866), Chrotogonus senegalensis (Krauss, 1877), Dictyophorus griseus (I. Bolivar, 1894), Pyrgomorpha vignaudii (Guérin-Méneville, 1849), SEINO Richard Akwanjoh Taphronota thaelephora (Stal, 1873) and Zonocerus variegatus (Linnaeus, 1793) have been Department of the Biological recorded from various localities in the Menoua Division in the West Region of Cameroon. The Sciences, Faculty of Science, The main objective of this study was to explore the short- horn grasshopper species belonging to the University of Bamenda, P.O. Box Subfamily Pyrgomorphinae (Family: Pyrgomorphidae, Order: Orthoptera) from Cameroon along 39, Bambili – Bamenda, with new record, measurement of different body parts and Bio-Ecology. Cameroon Keywords: Extra-Parental Care, Brood-Care Behavior, Burying Beetles DONGMO Tonleu Ingrid Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Science, University of 1. Introduction Dschang, P.O. Box 67, Dschang The Pyrgomorphinae is an orthopteran subfamily whose members are aposematically coloured Cameroon with some of them known pest of agricultural importance in Cameroon. The subfamily Pyrgomorphinae from Africa have been severally studied [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Some species have been MANJELI Yacouba studied and described from Cameroon [3, 4, 7, 8]. Most recently, reported sixteen Pyrgomorphinae Department of Animal species have been reported for Cameroon [9].
    [Show full text]