Efficacy of Double Dose Dapsone Combination Therapy in The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Efficacy of Double Dose Dapsone Combination Therapy in The Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 1 September 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202009.0009.v1 1 Case Report 2 Efficacy of Double Dose Dapsone Combination 3 Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Lyme 4 Disease/Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome 5 (PTLDS) and Associated Co-infections: A Report of 6 Three Cases 7 Richard Horowitz 1,2 and Phyllis Freeman 2,* 8 1 Member, HHS Babesia and Tick-borne Pathogens Subcommittee, Washington, D.C. 20201, USA; 9 [email protected] 10 2 Hudson Valley Healing Arts Center, Hyde Park, N.Y. 12538, USA 11 * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 1-845-229-8977 12 Received: date; Accepted: date; Published: date 13 Abstract: Three patients with multi-year histories of relapsing and remitting Lyme disease and 14 associated co-infections despite extended antibiotic therapy were each given double dose dapsone 15 combination therapy (DDD CT) for a total of 7-8 weeks. At the completion of therapy, all three 16 patients major Lyme symptoms remained in remission for a period of 25-30 months. In conclusion, 17 Double dose dapsone therapy could represent a novel and effective anti-infective strategy in 18 chronic Lyme disease/PTLDS, especially in those individuals who have failed regular dose dapsone 19 combination therapy (DDS CT) or standard antibiotic protocols. A randomized, blinded, 20 placebo-controlled trial is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of DDD CT in those individuals with 21 chronic Lyme disease/PTLDS. 22 Keywords: Lyme disease; Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS); dapsone combination 23 therapy (DDS CT); double dose dapsone combination therapy (DDD CT); babesiosis; persistent 24 infection 25 26 1. Introduction 27 Lyme disease affects over 300,000 Americans per year [1] [2] and at least 2 million individuals in 28 the United States have been reported to be suffering from Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome 29 (PTLDS) [3]. In Europe, Lyme borreliosis is also the most common tick-borne disease [4] and 30 worldwide estimates suggest an increase in tick-vectored disease incidence and distribution [5]. 31 Ticks can contain a broad range of bacteria (i.e., borrelia spp., rickettsia spp., tularemia), viruses (i.e., 32 tick-borne encephalitis virus, Powassan virus) and parasites (babesia)[6]. Estimates from the World 33 Health Organization suggest that 17% of human global infectious disease burden are vector-borne, 34 with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex and relapsing fever borreliosis comprising the major 35 borrelia spp. vectored by ticks [7]. Based on the geographical spread and increasing number of 36 individuals suffering from Lyme and associated tick-borne diseases (TBD’s), and significant health 37 care costs associated with treatment failures [8][9], the necessity of finding effective treatments for 38 Lyme borreliosis and associated co-infections is vitally important from a public health perspective. 39 Approximately 10-20% of individuals treated for Lyme disease with a 2-4-week course of 40 antibiotics will go on to experience chronic, persistent fatigue, musculoskeletal pain and 41 neurocognitive difficulties that persist for more than 6 months, known as Post-Treatment Lyme 42 Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) [10]. The etiology of Chronic Lyme disease/PTLDS is unknown, Antibiotics 2020, 9, x; doi: FOR PEER REVIEW www.mdpi.com/journal/antibiotics © 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 1 September 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202009.0009.v1 Antibiotics 2020, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 22 43 although several major hypotheses have been proposed to explain persistent symptoms, including 44 persistence of Borrelia and/or borrelial antigens, persistent tick-borne co-infections, immune 45 dysregulation, altered neural networks with central sensitization, and/or overlapping sources of 46 inflammation [11][12][13][14]. Borrelia’s ability to persist in the body has been hypothesized to take 47 place through multiple mechanisms. These include immune evasion with borrelia changing its 48 surface antigenic expression in response to host immune responses [15] [16], persistence in the 49 intracellular compartment [17] [18], and changing morphological forms in various environments [19] 50 [20] [21] [22], resulting in atypical cystic forms [23], pleomorphic round bodies (cell wall deficient, 51 L-forms) [20], as well as ‘persister’ and ‘biofilm forms’[24] [25] [26] [27] [28]. The stationary, 52 persister, and biofilm forms of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) have been found to be resistant to standard 53 antibiotic treatments and a cause of persistent inflammation [29][30][31]. This phenotypic plasticity 54 of Borrelia and its survival in biofilms may help to explain in part clinical conundrums and persistent 55 symptomatology [32]. 56 There have been several studies to date evaluating persister drugs and biofilm agents in the 57 treatment of Lyme disease. Most of these have been in vitro studies, using essential oils, herbal 58 compounds like Stevia, or drugs found through a search of the NCI compound collection or FDA 59 approved drug library [33][34] [35][29]. Two of these compounds, dapsone and disulfiram, which 60 are both sulfa drugs, have been found to be effective against stationary phase Borrelia burgdorferi [36] 61 [37][38] and evaluated in clinical studies. Disulfiram was found in a small case series to have a 62 positive clinical effect in three patients who required intensive open-ended antimicrobial therapy for 63 chronic relapsing neurological Lyme disease and relapsing babesiosis [39]. Dapsone combination 64 therapy (DDS CT) has been published in two, separate retrospective case series, totaling 300 65 patients, to have a positive effect on eight major Lyme symptoms, and improve treatment outcomes 66 among patients with chronic Lyme disease/PTLDS and associated coinfections in those failing 67 traditional antibiotic therapy [40][14]. 68 Success in the prior DDS CT trials was operationally defined as improvement in percent of 69 normal after 6 months on DDS CT, and failure was operationally defined as remaining the same or 70 worsening of the percentage of normal after at least 6 months of DDS CT. “Of 181 participants who 71 gave both pre-DDS and DDS percentage scores, 14 participants reported feeling worse currently 72 than they did before the DDS, 22 participants reported no difference, while all other participants 73 (145) currently reported a higher percentage of normal”[14]. Causes of potential failures of DDS CT 74 highlighted in Part 1 of our Precision Medicine study included evidence of chronic persistent 75 infection with Borrelia, Bartonella, and Mycoplasma species, as well as B. microti. These were all shown 76 to persist despite commonly prescribed courses of antibiotics or antimalarial/Babesia therapy [14]. 77 Persistence of bacteria can be explained in part by bacterial biofilms, in which cells are protected 78 from the immune system by surface exopolymers with polysaccharides [41]. Antibiotics have been 79 shown in this model to kill regular cells, leaving dormant persisters alive, and when the 80 concentration of antibiotic drops, they resuscitate and repopulate the biofilm [42]. 81 Since the dosage of dapsone in the initial two studies varied between 25 and 100 mg/day, and 82 the effect of ‘persister’ drugs like dapsone may depend on drug dependent concentrations and its 83 effect on biofilms [43], we decided to try a higher dose of dapsone (100 mg BID) for one month in 84 several patients with a history of chronic, persistent relapses. We present here three case studies of 85 individuals who took 7-8 weeks of dapsone combination therapy using hydroxychloroquine, 86 cimetidine, nystatin, a tetracycline, rifampin, and dapsone (DDS CT), where the dose of dapsone was 87 increased the second month to 100 mg BID, i.e., double dose dapsone combination therapy (DDD 88 CT). Nutritional support included N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg PO BID, alpha lipoic acid 600 mg PO 89 BID, gradually increasing doses of glutathione up to 1000-2000 mg BID by the end of the first month, 90 folinic acid (Leucovorin 25 mg PO BID month one, 25 mg TID month 2), L-methyl folate 15 mg PO 91 BID, along with three biofilm agents (Stevia, oregano oil, Biocidin) and three probiotics (Theralac, 92 Ultra Flora DF, saccharomyces boulardii). Patients signed informed consent forms that listed the major 93 side effects of dapsone combination therapy, which included Herxheimer reactions, anemia 94 secondary to folic acid inhibition (hemolytic anemia was minimized by ensuring all patients had Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 1 September 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202009.0009.v1 Antibiotics 2020, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 22 95 normal levels of G-6-P-D, or they were ineligible for the trial), rashes (secondary to sulfa sensitivity) 96 and/or methemoglobinemia (secondary to increased oxidative stress and decreased heme oxygen 97 carrying capacity). Patients were instructed to get regular laboratory testing with a complete blood 98 count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic profile (CMP) and methemoglobin levels once at 100 mg of 99 dapsone, and to repeat laboratory testing weekly during the second month of higher dose therapy. 100 Any major changes in their symptoms were to be reported immediately to the first author via an 101 emergency cell phone number. After stopping all antibiotic therapy once the trial was completed, all 102 three individuals remained on biofilm agents, folic acid replacement and probiotics for the next 103 several months. All three patients remained in remission for time periods ranging between 2 and 3 104 years with no further Lyme and tickborne symptoms after completing DDD CT. 105 2. Case 1 106 This 20-year-old Black male, with a past medical history significant for Lyme disease and 107 babesiosis, as well as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), became our patient in June 2017.
Recommended publications
  • CLINICAL USE of RIFABUTIN, a RIFAMYCIN-CLASS ANTIBIOTIC, for the TREATMENT of TUBERCULOSIS (A Supplement to the 2008 Revision Of“ Standards for Tuberculosis Care”)
    Kekkaku Vol. 86, No. 1: 43, 2011 43 CLINICAL USE OF RIFABUTIN, A RIFAMYCIN-CLASS ANTIBIOTIC, FOR THE TREATMENT OF TUBERCULOSIS (A supplement to the 2008 revision of“ Standards for tuberculosis care”) August, 2008 The Treatment Committee of the Japanese Society for Tuberculosis The Treatment Committee of the Japanese Society for [Dosage and administration of rifabutin] Tuberculosis published statements on the“ Standards for Rifabutin, 5 mg/kg in body weight/day, maximum 300 mg/ tuberculosis care” in April 2008. Therein we referred to day, once daily. rifampicin as follows“; Use of rifampicin requires attention The dosage of rifabutin can be increased up to the maximum because of the interactions with a number of other drugs. daily dose of 450 mg in cases where decreased rifabutin serum Particularly for HIV-infected patients who need antiviral levels are expected due to anti-HIV drugs such as efavirenz, drugs, the replacement of rifampicin by rifabutin should be and in other cases if necessary. considered”. Rifabutin, belonging to rifamycin-class antibiotics In non-HIV-infected patients, rifabutin can be used for like rifampicin, causes less significant drug-drug interactions intermittent treatment with a regimen of twice or three times a than rifampicin, and can be used in combination with antiviral week, with the same dosage as daily administration. drugs mentioned above. In July 2008, rifabutin was approved as antituberculous drug, and is expected to be added to the drug [Important points for use of rifabutin] price listing in the near future*. Therefore, to the published (1) Rifabutin causes drug interactions due to induction of opinions, we add new statements concerning the use of rifabutin hepatic enzyme though less significantly than rifampicin.
    [Show full text]
  • Rifabutin (Mycobutin) Reference Number: HIM.PA.12 Effective Date: 09.04.18 Last Review Date: 11.19 Revision Log Line of Business: HIM
    Clinical Policy: Rifabutin (Mycobutin) Reference Number: HIM.PA.12 Effective Date: 09.04.18 Last Review Date: 11.19 Revision Log Line of Business: HIM See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description Rifabutin (Mycobutin®) is a derivative of rifamycin, an antimycobacterial agent. FDA Approved Indication(s) Mycobutin is indicated for the prevention of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease in patients with advanced HIV infection. Policy/Criteria Provider must submit documentation (such as office chart notes, lab results or other clinical information) supporting that member has met all approval criteria. It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation® that Mycobutin is medically necessary when the following criteria are met: I. Initial Approval Criteria A. Mycobacterium avium Complex Prophylaxis (must meet all): 1. Prescribed by or in consultation with an HIV or infectious disease specialist; 2. Age ≥ 18 years; 3. Failure of azithromycin or clarithromycin, unless contraindicated or clinically significant adverse effects are experienced; 4. Dose does not exceed 300 mg per day. Approval duration: 12 months B. Tuberculosis (must meet all): 1. Diagnosis of tuberculosis infection; 2. Prescribed by or in consultation with an HIV or infectious disease specialist; 3. Documentation of current treatment with protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) for the treatment of HIV infection; 4. Age ≥ 18 years; 5. Dose does not exceed 5 mg/kg per day. Approval duration: 12 months C. Other diagnoses/indications 1. Refer to the off-label use policy for the relevant line of business if diagnosis is NOT specifically listed under section III (Diagnoses/Indications for which coverage is NOT authorized): HIM.PHAR.21 for health insurance marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • RIFABUTIN Rifabutin Must Be Taken Regularly to Higher Risk of Bacterial Infection), Or Be Effective and to Prevent the Anemia (A Reduced Number of Red
    RIFABUTIN Rifabutin must be taken regularly to higher risk of bacterial infection), or be effective and to prevent the anemia (a reduced number of red development of resistance. Take all blood cells that can make you feel Other NAMES: Mycobutin of your doses even if you begin to tired and short of breath). In rare feel better. cases it can also cause WHY is this drug prescribed? thrombocytopenia (a reduced What should you do if you number of platelets so that you bleed Rifabutin is an antibacterial drug used to FORGET a dose? or bruise more easily), or changes in prevent or treat Mycobacterium avium liver function . Blood tests will be complex (MAC) infection. When used If you miss a dose of rifabutin, take it done regularly to check for any to treat MAC, it is usually used in as soon as possible. However, if it is changes in these values. Inform combination with other agents. time for your next dose, do not your doctor or pharmacist if you have double the dose, just carry on with symptoms such as fever, chills, Rifabutin may also be used to treat other your regular schedule. shortness of breath, racing types of infections, including heartbeat, fatigue, bleeding or tuberculosis. What ADVERSE EFFECTS can this bruising. drug cause? What should you do HOW should this drug be taken? about them? Rifabutin may cause uveitis (an inflammation of the eye causing When used to prevent or treat MAC, the Most adverse effects of rifabutin are pain, redness and loss of vision). It usual dose is 300mg once daily.
    [Show full text]
  • EMA/CVMP/158366/2019 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use
    Ref. Ares(2019)6843167 - 05/11/2019 31 October 2019 EMA/CVMP/158366/2019 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use Advice on implementing measures under Article 37(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 on veterinary medicinal products – Criteria for the designation of antimicrobials to be reserved for treatment of certain infections in humans Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2019. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Introduction On 6 February 2019, the European Commission sent a request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for a report on the criteria for the designation of antimicrobials to be reserved for the treatment of certain infections in humans in order to preserve the efficacy of those antimicrobials. The Agency was requested to provide a report by 31 October 2019 containing recommendations to the Commission as to which criteria should be used to determine those antimicrobials to be reserved for treatment of certain infections in humans (this is also referred to as ‘criteria for designating antimicrobials for human use’, ‘restricting antimicrobials to human use’, or ‘reserved for human use only’). The Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) formed an expert group to prepare the scientific report. The group was composed of seven experts selected from the European network of experts, on the basis of recommendations from the national competent authorities, one expert nominated from European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), one expert nominated by European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), one expert with expertise on human infectious diseases, and two Agency staff members with expertise on development of antimicrobial resistance .
    [Show full text]
  • E3 Appendix 1 (Part 1 of 2): Search Strategy Used in MEDLINE
    This single copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. For permission to reprint multiple copies or to order presentation-ready copies for distribution, contact CJHP at [email protected] Appendix 1 (part 1 of 2): Search strategy used in MEDLINE # Searches 1 exp *anti-bacterial agents/ or (antimicrobial* or antibacterial* or antibiotic* or antiinfective* or anti-microbial* or anti-bacterial* or anti-biotic* or anti- infective* or “ß-lactam*” or b-Lactam* or beta-Lactam* or ampicillin* or carbapenem* or cephalosporin* or clindamycin or erythromycin or fluconazole* or methicillin or multidrug or multi-drug or penicillin* or tetracycline* or vancomycin).kf,kw,ti. or (antimicrobial or antibacterial or antiinfective or anti-microbial or anti-bacterial or anti-infective or “ß-lactam*” or b-Lactam* or beta-Lactam* or ampicillin* or carbapenem* or cephalosporin* or c lindamycin or erythromycin or fluconazole* or methicillin or multidrug or multi-drug or penicillin* or tetracycline* or vancomycin).ab. /freq=2 2 alamethicin/ or amdinocillin/ or amdinocillin pivoxil/ or amikacin/ or amoxicillin/ or amphotericin b/ or ampicillin/ or anisomycin/ or antimycin a/ or aurodox/ or azithromycin/ or azlocillin/ or aztreonam/ or bacitracin/ or bacteriocins/ or bambermycins/ or bongkrekic acid/ or brefeldin a/ or butirosin sulfate/ or calcimycin/ or candicidin/ or capreomycin/ or carbenicillin/ or carfecillin/ or cefaclor/ or cefadroxil/ or cefamandole/ or cefatrizine/ or cefazolin/ or cefixime/ or cefmenoxime/ or cefmetazole/ or cefonicid/ or cefoperazone/
    [Show full text]
  • Customs Tariff - Schedule
    CUSTOMS TARIFF - SCHEDULE 99 - i Chapter 99 SPECIAL CLASSIFICATION PROVISIONS - COMMERCIAL Notes. 1. The provisions of this Chapter are not subject to the rule of specificity in General Interpretative Rule 3 (a). 2. Goods which may be classified under the provisions of Chapter 99, if also eligible for classification under the provisions of Chapter 98, shall be classified in Chapter 98. 3. Goods may be classified under a tariff item in this Chapter and be entitled to the Most-Favoured-Nation Tariff or a preferential tariff rate of customs duty under this Chapter that applies to those goods according to the tariff treatment applicable to their country of origin only after classification under a tariff item in Chapters 1 to 97 has been determined and the conditions of any Chapter 99 provision and any applicable regulations or orders in relation thereto have been met. 4. The words and expressions used in this Chapter have the same meaning as in Chapters 1 to 97. Issued January 1, 2019 99 - 1 CUSTOMS TARIFF - SCHEDULE Tariff Unit of MFN Applicable SS Description of Goods Item Meas. Tariff Preferential Tariffs 9901.00.00 Articles and materials for use in the manufacture or repair of the Free CCCT, LDCT, GPT, UST, following to be employed in commercial fishing or the commercial MT, MUST, CIAT, CT, harvesting of marine plants: CRT, IT, NT, SLT, PT, COLT, JT, PAT, HNT, Artificial bait; KRT, CEUT, UAT, CPTPT: Free Carapace measures; Cordage, fishing lines (including marlines), rope and twine, of a circumference not exceeding 38 mm; Devices for keeping nets open; Fish hooks; Fishing nets and netting; Jiggers; Line floats; Lobster traps; Lures; Marker buoys of any material excluding wood; Net floats; Scallop drag nets; Spat collectors and collector holders; Swivels.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Listing of ATC Drugs & Codes
    Alphabetical Listing of ATC drugs & codes. Introduction This file is an alphabetical listing of ATC codes as supplied to us in November 1999. It is supplied free as a service to those who care about good medicine use by mSupply support. To get an overview of the ATC system, use the “ATC categories.pdf” document also alvailable from www.msupply.org.nz Thanks to the WHO collaborating centre for Drug Statistics & Methodology, Norway, for supplying the raw data. I have intentionally supplied these files as PDFs so that they are not quite so easily manipulated and redistributed. I am told there is no copyright on the files, but it still seems polite to ask before using other people’s work, so please contact <[email protected]> for permission before asking us for text files. mSupply support also distributes mSupply software for inventory control, which has an inbuilt system for reporting on medicine usage using the ATC system You can download a full working version from www.msupply.org.nz Craig Drown, mSupply Support <[email protected]> April 2000 A (2-benzhydryloxyethyl)diethyl-methylammonium iodide A03AB16 0.3 g O 2-(4-chlorphenoxy)-ethanol D01AE06 4-dimethylaminophenol V03AB27 Abciximab B01AC13 25 mg P Absorbable gelatin sponge B02BC01 Acadesine C01EB13 Acamprosate V03AA03 2 g O Acarbose A10BF01 0.3 g O Acebutolol C07AB04 0.4 g O,P Acebutolol and thiazides C07BB04 Aceclidine S01EB08 Aceclidine, combinations S01EB58 Aceclofenac M01AB16 0.2 g O Acefylline piperazine R03DA09 Acemetacin M01AB11 Acenocoumarol B01AA07 5 mg O Acepromazine N05AA04
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • Information for the User Mycobutin®150Mg Capsules Rifabutin Read All
    Package Leaflet: I nformation for the user Mycobutin ®150mg capsules rifabutin Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start taking this medicine because it contains important information for you. • Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again. • If you have any further questions, ask your doctor, pharmacist or nurse. • This medicine has been prescribed for you only. Do not pass it on to others. It may harm them, even if their signs of illness are the same as yours. • If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor, pharmacist or nurse. This includes any possible side effects not listed in this leaflet. See section 4. What is in this leaflet 1. What Mycobutin is and what it is used for 2. What you need to know before you take Mycobutin 3. How to take Mycobutin 4. Possible side effects 5. How to store Mycobutin 6. Contents of the pack and other information 1. What Mycobutin is and what it is used for Mycobutin contains the active substance rifabutin, which is an antibiotic. It is used to treat infections caused by germs (bacteria) called mycobacteria. These are bacteria which cannot be destroyed with usual antibiotics. • One of the most common mycobacterial infections is Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mycobutin can be used in combination with other antibiotics for the treatment of tuberculosis of the lung. • Mycobutin can also be used to treat other mycobacterial infections such as Mycobacterium avium intracellulare (MAI, also known as MAC) or Mycobacterium xenopi. • People who are unable to fight infection (such as those with HIV) are more likely to be infected with mycobacteria; especially MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapy and Management of Pneumocystis Jirovecii Infection
    Journal of Fungi Review Therapy and Management of Pneumocystis jirovecii Infection P. Lewis White *, Jessica S. Price and Matthijs Backx Public Health Wales Microbiology Cardiff, UHW, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK; [email protected] (J.S.P.); [email protected] (M.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)29-2074-6581; Fax: +44-(0)29-2074-2161 Received: 10 October 2018; Accepted: 11 November 2018; Published: 22 November 2018 Abstract: The rates of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) are increasing in the HIV-negative susceptible population. Guidance for the prophylaxis and treatment of PcP in HIV, haematology, and solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients is available, although for many other populations (e.g., auto-immune disorders) there remains an urgent need for recommendations. The main drug for both prophylaxis and treatment of PcP is trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, but resistance to this therapy is emerging, placing further emphasis on the need to make a mycological diagnosis using molecular based methods. Outbreaks in SOT recipients, particularly renal transplants, are increasingly described, and likely caused by human-to-human spread, highlighting the need for efficient infection control policies and sensitive diagnostic assays. Widespread prophylaxis is the best measure to gain control of outbreak situations. This review will summarize diagnostic options, cover prophylactic and therapeutic management in the main at risk populations, while also covering aspects of managing resistant disease, outbreak situations, and paediatric PcP. Keywords: Pneumocystis pneumonia; PcP therapy; PcP diagnosis 1. Introduction The incidence of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) is rising as a result of an increase in the susceptible patient population.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Tool for Pathway-Based Rational Drug Repositioning Supplementary Information
    gene2drug: a Computational Tool for Pathway-based Rational Drug Repositioning Supplementary Information Francesco Napolitano1, Diego Carrella1, Barbara Mandriani1, Sandra Pisonero1, Diego Medina1, Nicola Brunetti-Pierri1,2, and Diego di Bernardo1,3 1Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Pozzuoli (NA), 80078, Italy. 2Department of Translational Medicine, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy 3Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy. List of Figures S1 Relation between PPI network-based and pathway based approaches. Given a therapeutic gene and the set of pathways it is annotated to according to the different databases, the other genes in the same pathways are topologically closer to it in the PPI network as compared to randomly chosen genes. The average shortest path from the selected gene to other pathway members is reported on the y axis for each database. 3 S2 Size of intersection between existent evidence scores in the STITCH database (subset matched against the Cmap database) as a percentage of the total number of evidences. Numbers on the diagonal represent how many times a drug-target evidence exists divided by the total number of reported pairs. A \combined score" always exist if one of the other evidences exist, thus \combined score" covers 100% of the pairs. Conversely, an \experimental" score is only present for 14% of the pairs. The \Text mining" evidence strongly drives the \combined score" covering 61% of all the known protein-target interactions in STITCH. 4 S3 Relative luminescence units (RLU) in Hepa1-6 cells transfected with a plasmid ex- pressing the luciferase gene under the control of the GPT promoter and incubated with various concentrations of fulvestrant.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria
    Cent. Eur. J. Med. • 4(2) • 2009 • 141-155 DOI: 10.2478/s11536-008-0088-9 Central European Journal of Medicine Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria Review Article Katrijn Bockstael*, Arthur Van Aerschot** Laboratory for Medicinal Chemistry, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Received 9 July 2008; Accepted 17 November 2008 Abstract: The development of antimicrobial resistance by bacteria is inevitable and is considered as a major problem in the treatment of bacterial infections in the hospital and in the community. Despite efforts to develop new therapeutics that interact with new targets, resistance has been reported even to these agents. In this review, an overview is given of the many therapeutic possibilities that exist for treatment of bacterial infections and how bacteria become resistant to these therapeutics. Keywords: Antimicrobial agents • Resistance development • Efflux • Alteration of drug target • Antibacterials © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 1. Introduction 2. Different mechanisms of resistance to antimicrobials The history of humankind can be regarded from a medical point of view as a struggle against infectious 2.1. Intrinsic resistance diseases. Infections were the leading cause of death Bacteria may be inherently resistant to an antimicrobial. th worldwide at the beginning of the 20 century. Since This passive resistance is a consequence of general the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming in adaptive processes that are not necessary linked to a 1929 and the first introduction of the sulpha drugs by given class of antimicrobials. An example of natural Domagk in 1932, the number of new antimicrobials resistance is Pseudomonas aeruginosa, whose low available has increased tremendously between 1940 membrane permeability is likely to be a main reason for and 1960.
    [Show full text]