DOCSLIB.ORG

Lives on Hold

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lives on Hold DUBLIN II REGULATION Lives on hold European Comparative Report Project HOME/2010/ERFX/CA/1721 DUBLIN II REGULATION Lives on hold European Comparative Report February 2013 Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................4 Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................4 Executive Summary .................................................................................................5 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................12 1.1. Legal Framework ................................................................................................................................13 1.1.1. From Schengen and beyond .....................................................................................................13 1.1.2. The Dublin Regulation ...............................................................................................................14 1.1.2.1. European Jurisprudence: Cracks in the Dublin system .................................................16 1.1.3. Recasting the Dublin Regulation ...............................................................................................17 II. Methodology ......................................................................................................18 III. Statistics and the cost of the Dublin system .................................................20 3.1. Dublin Regulation statistics ................................................................................................................21 3.2. Operational cost of the Dublin system ...............................................................................................23 IV. Report Findings ................................................................................................26 IV. The application of the Dublin Regulation criteria ..................................................................................27 4.1. The hierarchy of criteria ......................................................................................................................27 4.2. Unaccompanied children (Art. 6) .......................................................................................................28 4.2.1. Interpretation of Art. 6 ...............................................................................................................28 4.2.2. The application of the best interests of the child principle .......................................................29 4.2.3. Family tracing ............................................................................................................................30 4.2.4. Appointment of a guardian during the Dublin procedure..........................................................31 4.2.5. Age assessment ........................................................................................................................32 4.3. The Family unity provisions (Art. 7, 8 & 14) ........................................................................................34 4.3.1. Family definition (Art. 2(i)) ..........................................................................................................34 4.3.2. Family unity and the application of the Dublin Regulation (Art. 7, 8 &14) .......................................35 4.3.3. Simultaneous applications from family members (Art. 14) ........................................................40 4.4. Visas and residence documents (Art. 9) ............................................................................................40 4.5. Irregular border crossing and Eurodac (Art. 10) ................................................................................42 V. The use of Discretionary Provisions ........................................................................................................46 5.1. Sovereignty clause (Art. 3(2)) ..............................................................................................................46 5.1.1. Procedural aspects of the sovereignty clause ...........................................................................46 5.1.2. Application of the sovereignty clause for vulnerable persons ...................................................48 5.1.3. Application of the sovereignty clause for reasons of general conditions in another Member State.....................................................................................................................49 5.2. Humanitarian clause (Art. 15) .............................................................................................................50 VI. Procedural Safeguards ............................................................................................................................55 6.1. Access to information .........................................................................................................................55 6.1.1. Information leaflets ....................................................................................................................55 6.1.2. Information on the potential application of the Dublin Regulation in an individual case ...........56 6.2. A personal interview ...........................................................................................................................58 6.3. Access to Dublin case files ................................................................................................................59 6.4. Notification of the transfer decision ...................................................................................................60 6.5. Appeals ................................................................................................................................................62 6.5.1. Suspensive effect of appeals ....................................................................................................63 6.5.2. The competence of the Court ...................................................................................................64 6.5.3. Access to a Higher Court of Appeal ..........................................................................................64 6.5.4. Practical obstacles to accessing an effective remedy ...............................................................65 6.5.5. Other review mechanisms .........................................................................................................65 6.5.6. Legal Aid ...................................................................................................................................66 6.6. Access to the asylum procedure .......................................................................................................67 6.6.1. Access to the asylum procedure in a take back situation .........................................................68 6.6.2. Access to the asylum procedure in a take charge situation ......................................................70 6.6.3. Access to the asylum procedure in a Member State which took over responsibility for an asylum application and repeat Dublin Regulation cases .............................71 VII. Vulnerable Persons subject to the Dublin Procedure ..........................................................................75 7.1. Medical examinations within the Dublin procedure ..........................................................................75 7.2. Impact of vulnerability on Dublin transfers ........................................................................................76 7.3. Continuity of care within the Dublin procedure .................................................................................77 VIII. Reception Conditions and Detention ...................................................................................................81 8.1. Reception conditions ..........................................................................................................................81 8.1.1. Reception conditions pending transfer in the requesting Member State ................................81 8.1.2. Reception conditions in the responsible Member State ..........................................................83 8.2. Detention .............................................................................................................................................84 IX. Practical Aspects of the Dublin Regulation ...........................................................................................90 9.1. Transfer procedures ............................................................................................................................90 9.1.1. Responsible authorities .............................................................................................................90 9.1.2. Transfer methods and modalities ..............................................................................................90 9.1.3. Voluntary return to the country of origin ...................................................................................92 9.2. Time Limits ..........................................................................................................................................93 9.2.1. Respect for time limits ..............................................................................................................93
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Aesthetic Politics of Two Decades of Techno-Movement in France Jean-Christophe Sevin
    The aesthetic politics of two decades of techno-movement in France Jean-Christophe Sevin To cite this version: Jean-Christophe Sevin. The aesthetic politics of two decades of techno-movement in France. Open- Democracy, 2012. halshs-01951479 HAL Id: halshs-01951479 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01951479 Submitted on 11 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The aesthetic politics of two decades of techno-movement in France Jean-Christophe Sevin [1] 26 November 2012 The political debate around the techno-movement accompanied efforts by the French state to bring raves under state control. The aesthetic effect of these musical events remains a political challenge. This article is part of an occasional series on ‘The Political Aesthetics of Power and Protest,’ the subject of a one-day workshop held at the University of Warwick this September. Democracy, since it does not function through command or coercion, requires instead a constant renewal of sets of symbols - symbols which appeal to people and instil in them a sense of belonging and identification. Increasing disenchantment and disillusion with the state, with political institutions, their practices and performance, makes it more important to explore the place of this aestheticisation of political language, the aesthetics of protest as well as of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Integration Policies and Housing Policies: the Hidden Links
    IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION POLICIES AND HOUSING POLICIES: THE HIDDEN LINKS edited by Irene Ponzo December 2010 Index Foreword. Aims, structure and methodology of research……………………...……………….5 CHAPTER 1. SOCIAL HOUSING POLICIES AND ETHNIC MINORITIES IN THE UK: DEVELOPING AN ETHNICALLY SENSITIVE APPROACH……………...……….............8 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………….8 1.1. Main trends and changes in social housing policies……………………………………….8 1.1.1 Tenure reform: Reorganising social housing…………………………………………9 1.1.2 Reorganising social housing finance…………………………………………….......10 1.1.3 Enabling access to housing…………………………………………………………..12 1.2. Social housing policies' approach to immigrants and ethnic minorities and the most relevant measures/projects addressing them…………………………………………….12 1.2.1 National organisational initiatives……………………………………………….......13 1.2.2 Immigration policy …………………………………………………………………15 1.2.3 Integration and diversity: transversal policies for equalities, race relations and community cohesion policy …………………………………………………………17 1.2.4 Competition and conflict over access to social housing …………………………….20 1.3. Housing actors supporting the integration of immigrants ………………………………..22 1.3.1 Networks and partnerships ………………………………………………………….23 1.3.2 The key role of local authorities …………………………………………………….26 1.3.3 Non-profit and for-profit landlords………………………………………………… 27 1.4. Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………………... 28 CHAPTER 2. SOCIAL HOUSING AND ETHNIC MINORITIES IN THE NETHERLANDS …………………………………………………………………………………………………30 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………30
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Right to Asylum
    institut montaigne Saving the Right to Asylum REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 There is no desire more natural than the desire for knowledge Saving the Right to Asylum NOVEMBER 2018 www.institutmontaigne.org SUMMARY PRELIMINARY REMARKS 3 INTRODUCTION 5 I - THE UPHEAVALS OF ASYLUM 9 1.1. The significant increase in asylum applications in Europe 9 1.2. Transferring the burden onto asylum 23 1.3. The Dublin system is both unfair and ineffective 30 1.4. Its concrete objectives have not been met 35 II - THE PROPOSED SOLUTIONS ARE INEFFECTIVE AND NOT IN KEEPING WITH EUROPEAN VALUES 39 2.1. Mechanisms for improved monitoring of the flow of migrants 39 1 2.2. The attempts for an equitable burden sharing among European States have failed 50 III - RESHAPING THE EUROPEAN POLICY ON THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM TO RESTORE ITS MEANING AND EFFECTIVENESS 57 3.1. A European policy on the right to asylum that combines humanism, effectiveness and solidarity 58 3.2. Possible responses to a deadlock in European negotiations: the issue of differentiated enforcement 78 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Glossary 95 Appendix 2: Estimation of the cost of the proposals set out in this report 98 www.institutmontaigne.org Preliminary Remarks Saving Soldier Asylum.1 Although it was codified in its modern form during the early 1950s,2 the right to asylum has existed, in various forms, since ancient times. It is a centuries-old tradition, especially in Western Europe. However, it is clearly in danger in the European Union today. This peril is not only the result of the emergence of populist movements that challenge its legitimacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface to the Br International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services)
    INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION Radiocommunication Bureau PREFACE TO THE BR INTERNATIONAL FREQUENCY INFORMATION CIRCULAR (TERRESTRIAL SERVICES) English Edition BR IFIC 2770 . PREFACE TO THE BR INTERNATIONAL FREQUENCY INFORMATION CIRCULAR (TERRESTRIAL SERVICES) CONTENTS Page Chapter I – General ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter II – Description and layout of the BR International Frequency Information Circular ............................................................. 2 Section 1 – The BR International Frequency Information Circular (BR IFIC) .............................................................................. 2 Section 2 – The Special Sections annexed to the Circular .......................................................................................................... 4 Section 3 – The International Frequency List .............................................................................................................................. 6 Section 4 – Terrestrial Plans ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Section 5 – List of assignments to primary terrestrial services other than broadcasting associated with the GE06 agreement . 8 Section 6 – Terrestrial software ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL ACTS of the EXTRAORDINARY ADMINISTRATIVE RADIO CONFERENCE GENEVA, 1951 Volume III ANNEX 2 Region 1
    This electronic version (PDF) was scanned by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Library & Archives Service from an original paper document in the ITU Library & Archives collections. La présente version électronique (PDF) a été numérisée par le Service de la bibliothèque et des archives de l'Union internationale des télécommunications (UIT) à partir d'un document papier original des collections de ce service. Esta versión electrónica (PDF) ha sido escaneada por el Servicio de Biblioteca y Archivos de la Unión Internacional de Telecomunicaciones (UIT) a partir de un documento impreso original de las colecciones del Servicio de Biblioteca y Archivos de la UIT. (ITU) ﻟﻼﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻻﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺃﺟﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻧﺘﺎﺝ (PDF) ﺍﻹﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ .ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻮﻓﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﺎﺋﻖ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻧ ﻘ ﻼً 此电子版（PDF版本）由国际电信联盟（ITU）图书馆和档案室利用存于该处的纸质文件扫描提供。 Настоящий электронный вариант (PDF) был подготовлен в библиотечно-архивной службе Международного союза электросвязи путем сканирования исходного документа в бумажной форме из библиотечно-архивной службы МСЭ. BIBLIOTHÈQUE DE L’U. I. T. ACTES FINALS TOT DE LA CONFÉRENCE ADMINISTRATIVEI EXTRAORDINAIRE DES RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS GENÈVE 1951 Volume III ANNEXE 2 Région 1 FINAL ACTS OF THE EXTRAORDINARY ADMINISTRATIVE RADIO CONFERENCE GENEVA, 1951 Volume III ANNEX 2 Region 1 ACTAS FINALES UNION DE LA INTERNATIONALE CONFERENCIA ADMINISTRATIVA EXTRAORDINARIA DE RADIOCOMUNICACIONES DES TÉLÉCOMMUNICATIONS GINEBRA 1951 GENÈVE Volumen III ANEXO 2 Región
    [Show full text]
  • A Deradicalization Program Seen from the Inside
    Études de l’Ifri Focus stratégique 102 bis ONCE A JIHADIST, ALWAYS A JIHADIST? A Deradicalization Program Seen from the Inside Marc HECKER February 2021 Security Studies Center The French Institute of International Relations (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non- governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 979-10-373-0291-5 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2021 How to cite this publication: Marc Hecker, “Once a Jihadist, Always a Jihadist? A Deradicalization Program Seen from the Inside”, Focus stratégique, No. 102 bis, Ifri, February 2021. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE Tel.: +33 (0) 1 40 61 60 00 – Fax: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Focus stratégique Resolving today’s security problems requires an integrated approach. Analysis must be cross-cutting and consider the regional and global dimensions of problems, their technological and military aspects, as well as their media linkages and broader human consequences. It must also strive to understand the far reaching and complex dynamics of military transformation, international terrorism or post-conflict stabilization. Through the “Focus stratégique” series Ifri’s Security Studies Center aims to do so, offering new perspectives on the major international security issues in the world today.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying in France Questions & Answers Contents
    FAQ 2010 edition STUDYING IN FRANCE QUESTIONS & ANSWERS CONTENTS PLANNING MY STUDIES 3 1 What are the higher education qualifications in France? 3 2 What is the difference between a university and a Grande École? 8 3 How do I enrol at university? 10 BEFORE LEAVING MY COUNTRY 13 1 Where can I learn French in my country? 13 2 Where can I obtain a long-stay visa? 14 3 What types of grant can I receive? 18 4 What monthly budget should I plan for life in France? 18 AFTER ARRIVAL IN FRANCE 20 1 What documents will I need to present to the border authorities on arrival? 20 2 Once I have arrived in France, must I obtain a residence permit? 21 3 How do I get to Paris city centre and the rest of France from the airport? 23 4 How do I open a bank account in France? 25 5 Do I have the right to work during my studies? 26 6 How does social cover work in France and how can I benefit from it? 27 7 How do I find somewhere to live? 28 8 How can I obtain a room in a CROUS hall of residence? 29 9 How can I obtain a room at the Cité Universitaire Internationale de Paris? 31 10 Eating in university restaurants 32 11 Further questions 33 HOW TO CONTACT US? 35 PLANNING MY STUDIES 1 WHAT ARE THE HIGHER EDUCATION QUALIFICATIONS IN FRANCE? I=:;G:C8=JC>K:GH>INHNHI:B The main difficulty for foreign students is finding their place in relation to the French system of study and qualifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling , Cajoling Orco -Operating
    CONTROLLING, CAJOLING OR CO-OPERATING? [ CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS’ POLICY APPROACHES ] TOWARDS LOCAL GOVERNMENT ON THE ISSUES OF PERFORMANCE AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS This publication was written by Dr Jon Bloomfield, Honorary Lecturer to the Institute of Local Government Studies, for the Council of European Municipalities and Regions (CEMR). Institute of Local Government Studies School of Public Policy University of Birmingham Birmingham B15 2TT United Kingdom This publication can be downloaded from CEMR website: www.ccre.org Brussels, May 2006 Controlling, cajoling or co-operating? Central governments’ policy approaches towards local government on the issues of performance and cost-effectiveness []Contents Foreword 2 Chapter 1 - Setting the Scene 3 Chapter 2 - Germany 6 Chapter 3 - France 10 Chapter 4 - United Kingdom 13 Chapter 5 - The Netherlands 17 Chapter 6 - Czech Republic 20 Chapter 7 - Sweden 22 Chapter 8 - Trends and Directions 25 The Council of European Municipalities and Regions in a nutshell 28 1 Foreword The CEMR’s triennial General Assembly in May 2006 will In discussion with CEMR Secretary General Jeremy Smith we discuss the topic of the future of public services in Europe. agreed the sample of six European countries to investigate, The plenary sessions and workshops will explore issues such and a set of common questions was sent to their respective as improving and evaluating the quality of services; the national associations. I would like to thank Stefan Ackerby, problems of financing services; and the different ways of Mike Ashley, Christophe Chaillou, Birgit Frischmuth, Frank delivering services. The tension between local and regional Hilterman and Vana Lukas and their colleagues for their self-government on the one hand, and the controls helpful responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Receiving Migrants with Financial Support from the European Union
    EuroMed project Informing and Training Public Sector Union Representatives on Receiving Migrants with financial support from the European Union SURVEY REPORT AND RESULTS Receiving migrants: a public sector worker perspective in the EuroMed region Raffaella Greco Tonegutti Sponsor and Participants: LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Countries and organisations participating in the EuroMed project 07 Table 1b: Synopsis of Public Services Meeting Migrants project / EuroMed project 10 Table 2. Type of services by country 14 Table 3. Number of questionnaires collected by country 16 Table 4. Focus groups 17 Table 5. Nationality sample 19 Table 6. Gender sample 21 Table 7. Age sample 22 Table 8. Training sample 23 Table 9. Understanding of legislation on immigration and asylum 26 Table 10. Specific training for working in contact with migrant users 27 Table 11. Type of contract 30 Table 12. Role in the workplace 32 Table 13. Presence of a cultural mediator in the service 33 Table 14. Number of migrants received by the service each day 37 Table 15. Type of services 40 Table 16. Working conditions 42 Table 17. Specific problems with migrant users 43 Table 17b. Main issues 44 Table 18. Role of the union 48 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 7 2. EUROMED PROJECT ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prefects in Search of a Role in a Europeanised France
    Jnl Publ. Pol., 31, 3, 385–407 r Cambridge University Press, 2011 doi:10.1017/S0143814X11000122 Prefects in Search of a Role in a Europeanised France ALISTAIR COLE European Studies, Cardiff University ABSTRACT Based on extensive new empirical fieldwork (via a case study of the reform of the territorial State in 2007–2010), this article interrogates the meaning of the prefectoral institution in France. The central puzzle this article addresses is the survival of a pre-democratic institution – the Prefect in – a democratic, decentralizing and Europeanised Republic. Changing conditions have required institutional resilience and adaptation in a period of state restructuring and rescaling. The case study of the prefectures as old institutions is framed using language and tools of new institutionalism across three dimensions: the timing and sequence of decision-making, the logic of appropriateness, and interaction. BeyondthenarrowcaseoftheprefecturesinFrance,thearticlemakesthecase for combining modes of institutionalist analysis in order to penetrate generalities about the black box of institutions. Key words: France, prefects, decentralisaton, Europeanisation The central puzzle of this article is the survival of a 200 year old institution – the prefect – in the context of a democratic, decentralizing and Europeanised French Republic. The key justification for the institution has shifted over time. Far from the quasi-military logic inherent in the Napoleonic model, France’s contemporary prefects have justified their existence through notions related to the horizontal coordination of the State, partnership with local and regional authorities and orchestration of France’s interactions with the European Union in the field of regional policy. Insofar as the State still seeks a presence throughout France, however, it is physically embodied in the figure of the prefect, who can claim to represent the symbolic institutional continuity of the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Report by ACAT-France and FIACAT on Torture and Ill-Treatment in France
    Shadow report by aCAT-FranCe and FIaCAT on torture and Ill-treatment In FranCe Submitted to the Human Rights Committee during its review of the fifth periodic report of France 114th session, 29 June-24 July 2015 2 Shadow report by aCAT-FranCe and FIaCAT on torture and Ill-treatment In FranCe reSearCh and draFtInG aCAT-France Salomé Linglet, head of programmes on places of deprivation of liberty in France, [email protected] Eve Shahshahani, head of programmes on asylum, [email protected] Christine Laroque, head of international justice, [email protected] Hélène Legeay, head of programmes on North Africa and the Middle East (question of the additional protocol to the Franco-Moroccan convention on mutual legal assistance). CoordINATION aCAT-France Nordine Drici, director of programmes, Actions division, [email protected] FIaCAT Lionel Grassy,Permanent representative at the European institutions (Brussels) and the United Nations (Geneva), [email protected] Marie Salphati, intern responsible for drafting reports to international and regional mechanisms for the protection of human rights. Conception graphique : [email protected] © ACAT-France. Juin 2015 Shadow report by aCAT-FranCe and FIaCAT on torture and Ill-treatment In FranCe 3 IntroduCtory note ACAT-France, a Christian human rights organisation founded in 1974 to combat torture and to support the aboli- tion of the death penalty, protect victims and defend the right to asylum, and FIACAT, an international association with consultative status at the United Nations, are honoured to submit their concerns regarding the implementa- tion by France of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (hereafter ICCPR).
    [Show full text]
  • Unhcr Study on the Implementation of the Dublin Iii Regulation
    LEFT IN LIMBO UNHCR STUDY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DUBLIN III REGULATION LEFT IN LIMBO UNHCR STUDY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DUBLIN III REGULATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was coordinated by Silvia Cravesana in UNHCR’s Bureau for Europe (Policy and Legal Support Unit). This report was written by Silvia Cravesana and Maria Hennessy. This report brings together the main findings of national reports produced by Lucienne Joergensen (Denmark), Claire Callejon (France), Aida Worku (Germany), Aliki-Eleni Georgiadi (Greece), Pietro Sullo (Italy), Paolo Biondi (Malta), Vigdis Vevstad (Norway), Marta Gorczynska (Poland), Cynthia Orchard and Helen-Marie Fraher (United Kingdom). Particular thanks go to staff in UNHCR’s national offices in France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Poland and the United Kingdom, and in the Regional Representations for Western and Northern Europe for their important contributions. Appreciation is also extended to Reem Alsalem, Lucie Bichet, Sam Boutruche, Zoé Campiglia, Elena Colunga Caballero, Kate Connelly, Cathryn Costello, Alexander de Châlus, Yolande Ditewig, Madeline Garlick, Kristof Gombeer, Sophie Magennis, Hugh Massey, Maeve Patterson, Cornelia Schick, Juliette Tassy, Andrea Vonkeman and Cornelis Wouters for their inputs and support. Particular thanks also go to the colleagues in other organizations who provided advice and inputs in the initial phase of this research: Anneliese Baldaccini (Amnesty International), Daphné Bouteillet (ECRE) and Marc Provera (JRS). Finally, UNHCR expresses its sincere gratitude to Member State officials, representatives of organizations, lawyers, asylum-seekers and many others who agreed to be interviewed and provided information in the course of this research. © UNHCR, August 2017 This document is for general distribution. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]