White River National Forest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

White River National Forest 131 Walton Peak Never Little Troublesome North Never Summer Summer Green Barber Basin Troublesome **Map Key** Axial Creek South Adjacent Area Bowen Gulch Never Summer Cities/Towns Oak Creek Protection Area 34 Adjacent Area Roads Troublesome Proposed Colorado Roadless Areas (CRAs) Sarvis Creek Never Summer Grand Lake Phippsburg- White River National Forest Adjacent- Area Upper Tier Management Category 40 National Forest System Lands (Administrative Gold Run Boundaries) National Forest System Lands: Wilderness 13 Morapos A Colorado Roadless Areas with125 Areas Pagoda Peak Yampa National Forest System Other Congressionally Bunker Basin Designated Lands Indian Peaks Existing Permitted Ski Areas Adjacent Area Chatfield Upper Tier Management Category Fawn Creek/ State Boundary Morapos B Little Lost Park Ripple Creek Pass/ 40 Trappers Lake Granby 1:205,000 134 Toponas 40 Hot Sulphur Meeker Kremmling Springs 0 5 10 20 Miles Parshall Big Ridge to Dome South Fork A 131 Tabernash Dome Peak Kelly Creek Flat Tops 9 Fraser Red Dirt B Big Ridge to McCoy South Fork B Copper Mountain Winter Park Big Ridge to Byers Peak Burns North Elk South Fork A Bond WINTER Red Dirt A PARK State Bridge Byers Budges Blair Williams Fork Peak Mountain Sweetwater A Elliot Ridge Black Lake Vasquez Vasquez West Black Byers Peak Peak Adjacent Lake East Area Ptarmigan B Lower Piney Rio Blanco Sweetwater B Ptarmigan C Williams Fork Deep Creek Ptarmingan Adjacent Boulder Berry Creek Freeman Elk Creek B Ptarmigan Creek Piney Spraddle Bard Creek Wolcott Maryland Lake Creek A Peak Creek 70 LOVELAND Eagles Nest Willow Spraddle Creek B Ptarmigan A Mount Eagle Sniktau 13 70 Buffer Mountain Edwards Tenderfoot Mountain Silverthorne Avon Dillon ARAPAHOE Ryan Gulch BASIN Porcupine Grizzly Creek Meadow Corral Peak West Mountain A New Castle VAIL Creek Lake Game BEAVER East Square Top Little Grand Mesa Salt Creek CREEK Creek Meadow Vail Mountain Creek KEYSTONE Montezuma Rifle Glenwood Springs Mountain B Frisco West Corral Burning Hardscrabble Gilman Ptarmigan Brush Creek Bear Hill A 70 Cardiff Creek Adam Redcliff Mountain Gypsum Creek Tigiwon Ptarmigan Hill B BRECKENRIDGE Parachute 82 COPPER Breckenridge Basalt Mountain A MOUNTAIN Tenmile Jefferson Holy Cross Ptarmigan Hill A Red Table Homestake Woods Mamm Peak Basalt Mountain B Kokomo Carbondale Lake SKI Holy Cross SUNLIGHT City Boreas East Divide/ No Name Chicago Ridge Hoosier Four Mile Park Ridge Climax Jefferson Battlements Meredith Sloan Peak SKI Mormon Creek COOPER Housetop Snowmass Holy Cross 285 Mountain Wildcat Chicago Ridge Holy Cross Silverheels 9 Mountain Wildcat Reno Mountain Baldy Mountain 91 Mountain B Como Sunnyside Hay Park Thompson Creek Woody Creek Wildcat Hightower North Woody Alma Collbran Mountain C East Willow Assignation Crystal Ridge River Mount Massive Leadville Red Mountain Molina Clear Fork Fairplay Burnt BUTTERMILK Mount Mesa Turner Creek Mountain Aspen Hunter Hunter-Fryingpan Redstone SNOWMASS 24 Salt Creek ASPEN Massive MOUNTAIN Weston Crystal ASPEN HIGHLANDS Peak Huntsman Ridge River North Maroon McFarlane Independent A Buffalo Peaks East North Cottonwoods West Independent B Flattops/Elk Park Maroon Bells-Snowmass Mount Elbert McClure Gallo Hill 285 Garo POWDERHORN Grand Mesa Tomahawk Pass Electric Mountain Marble Twin Lakes 82 Buffalo 133 Elk Mountain- Buffalo Peaks Peaks Ashcroft Collegiate West West East Treasure Granite Mountain Buffalo Tomahawk Schofield Elk Mountain- Pilot Knob Pass Currant Creek Collegiate North Peaks Hartsel Raggeds Kannah The USDA Forest Service manages this data for planning purposes only, and provides no Creek Munsey/ Collegiate Peaks warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any other use of this data. It is the sole Poverty Gothic Elk Mountain- responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data are suitable for any other purposes, Erickson Italian Mountain Collegiate North and to apply this data in an appropriate and conscientious manner. Map Created: March 2010. Gulch Buffalo Peaks South Double Top c:\projects\roadless_mar2009\WR_Codified_23Mar2010.mxd Deer Creek American Flag Mountain Cedaredge.
Recommended publications
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 103. NUMBER 5 NEW UPPER CAMBRIAN TRILOBITES (With 21 Plates) BY CHARLES E. RESSER Curator, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology and Paleobotany U. S. National Museum (Publication 3693) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 21, 1942 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 103. NUMBER 5 NEW UPPER CAMBRIAN TRILOBITES (With 21 Plates) BY CHARLES E. RESSER Curator, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology and Paleobotany U. S. National Museum (Publication 3693) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 21, 1942 BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A. CONTENTS PAGE Introduction i Description of genera and species 2 Komaspidae Kobayashi 2 Chariocephalus Hall 4 Irvingella Ulrich and Resser 13 Parairvingella Kobayashi 25 Drumaspis, new genus 28 Unclassified genera 35 Cheilocephalns Berkey 35 Cholopilus Raymond 36 Caiyptonima, new genus 37 Illaenurus Hall 38 Platycolpus Raymond 40 Enontioura, new genus 42 Macclloura Resser 43 Arapahoia Miller 43 Plethomctopus Ulrich 47 Kingstonia VValcott 47 Byniunia Walcott 52 BynumicUa, new genus 57 Bynumina, new genus 58 Stenopilns Raymond 59 Blountia Walcott 60 Blountiella Resser 61 Ellipsocephaloides Kobayashi 62 MaryviUia Walcott 67 Meteoraspis Resser 72 Coosia Walcott 73 Coosella Lochman 75 Ptcroccphalina Resser 76 Burnetidae, new family 79 Burnetia Walcott 80 Iddingsia Walcott 85 Berkeia Resser 90 Unclassified genera 94 Elvinia Walcott 94 Taenicephalus Ulrich and Resser 99 Talbotina Lochman 107 Explanation of plates 109 Index 131 iii NEW UPPER CAMBRIAN TRILOBITES By CHARLES E. RESSER Curator, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology and Paleobotany, U. S. National Museum (With 21 Plates) INTRODUCTION Soon after 1878 when Dr. C. D. Walcott centered his main efforts on the study of the Cambrian system, he conceived the idea of a monograph series, each of which should contain descriptions of all Cambrian fossils representing a major animal group.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed Gunnison Forest Reserve, Colorado
    THE PROPOSED GUNNISON FOREST RESERVE COLORADO _________ Examination, Report, and Recommendations By Smith Riley _________ Bureau of Forestry U.S. Department of Agriculture 1904 A facsimile of a copy acquired from the National Archives and Records Administration, Rocky Mountain Regional Office at Denver Federal Center February 24, 2005 by David Bradford. 1 The Proposed Gunnison Forest Reserve, Colorado ________ Location – Area – Topography The proposed Gunnison Forest Reserve is in Central Western Colorado, lying mostly in the Gunnison County with small projections into Delta and Montrose Counties. Designed largely to protect the flow of the Gunnison River, it covers the northern and eastern watershed of that stream, including the West Elk Mountains, Fossil Ridge, and all the mountainous area on the headwaters of Taylor and East Rivers. It contains 929,704 acres, and is 72 miles from east to west and 36 miles from north to south. The larger portion of the Tin Cup, Italian Mountain, Crested Butte, and Sunset mining districts are within the area. Only mountain lands are included, the higher points being between 13,000 and 14,000 feet in altitude, and the lowest limits between 7,000 and 8,000 feet. With the exception of the Taylor Park district and the Black Mesa, just above the Gunnison Canon, the entire area is rough in the extreme and difficult to traverse. The streams rising in the West Elk Mountains flow in deep rough canons which divide the lower south and west slopes into many mesas. The Taylor Park district is precipitous along the divide, and breaks off to tough mountainous country just above the south line of the reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Mountain Soils
    2015 In every mountain region, soils constitute the foundation for agriculture, supporting essential ecosystem functions and food security. Mountain soils benefit not only the 900 million people living in the world’s mountainous areas but also billions more living downstream. Soil is a fragile resource that needs time to regenerate. Mountain soils are particularly susceptible to climate change, deforestation, unsustainable farming practices and resource extraction methods that affect their fertility and trigger land degradation, desertification and disasters such as floods and landslides. Mountain peoples often have a deep-rooted connection to the soils they live on; it is a part of their heritage. Over the centuries, they have developed solutions and techniques, indigenous practices, knowledge and sustain- able soil management approaches which have proved to be a key to resilience. This publication, produced by the Mountain Partnership as a contribution to the International Year of Soils 2015, presents the main features of mountain soil systems, their environmental, economic and social values, the threats they are facing and the cultural traditions concerning them. Case studies provided by Mountain Partnership members and partners around the world showcase challenges and opportunities as well as lessons learned in soil management. This publication presents a series of lessons learned and recommendations to inform moun- Understanding Mountain soils tain communities, policy-makers, development experts and academics who support sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Creek, (2,600 Acres)
    GRAND MESA, UNCOMPAHGRE, AND GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST Agate Creek, (11,800 acres)............................................................................................................ 3 American Flag Mountain, (11,900 acres) ....................................................................................... 4 Baldy, (2,300 acres) ........................................................................................................................ 5 Battlements, (24,400 acres)............................................................................................................. 6 Beaver (3,700 acres) ....................................................................................................................... 7 Beckwiths, (18,400 acres) ............................................................................................................... 8 Calamity Basin, (12,500 acres) ....................................................................................................... 9 Cannibal Plateau, (14,500 acres) .................................................................................................. 10 Canyon Creek (10,900 acres); Canyon Creek/Antero, (1,700 acres) ........................................... 11 Carson, (6,000 acres) .................................................................................................................... 13 Castle, (9,400 acres) ...................................................................................................................... 14 Cataract,
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF GRAND MESA, UNCOMPAHGRE, AND GUNNISON NATIONAL FORESTS ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAND MESA, UNCOMPAHGRE, AND GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST ........................................................5 Agate Creek, # 40 (12,700 acres)...............................................................................................................................5 American Flag Mountain, # 32 (9,500 acres) ............................................................................................................5 Baldy, #53 (2,300 acres).............................................................................................................................................6 Battlements, #04 (24,700 acres).................................................................................................................................7 Beaver # 18 (3,600 acres) .........................................................................................................................................7 Beckwiths, #16 (18,600 acres)...................................................................................................................................8 Calamity Basin, #63 (12,200 acres) ...........................................................................................................................9 Cannibal Plateau, #44 (14,500 acres).......................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Climate Change Effects on Mountain Ecosystems Through a Cross-Site Analysis in the Alps and Apennines
    Assessment of climate change effects on mountain ecosystems through a cross-site analysis in the Alps and Apennines. Rogora M.1*a, Frate L.2a, Carranza M.L.2a, Freppaz M.3a, Stanisci A.2a, Bertani I.4, Bottarin R.5, Brambilla A.6, Canullo R.7, Carbognani M.8, Cerrato C.9, Chelli S.7, Cremonese E.10, Cutini M.11, Di Musciano M.12, Erschbamer B.13, Godone D.14, Iocchi M.11, Isabellon M.3,10, Magnani A.15, Mazzola L.16, Morra di Cella U.17, Pauli H.18, Petey M.17, Petriccione B.19, Porro F.20, Psenner R.5, 21, Rossetti G.22, Scotti A.5, Sommaruga R.21, Tappeiner U.5, Theurillat J.-P.23, Tomaselli M.8, Viglietti D.3, Viterbi R.9, Vittoz P.24, Winkler M.18 Matteucci G.25a *Corresponding author: e-mail address: [email protected] (M. Rogora) a joint first authors 1 CNR Institute of Ecosystem Study, Verbania Pallanza, Italy 2 DIBT, Envix-Lab, University of Molise, Pesche (IS), Italy 3 DISAFA, NatRisk, University of Turin, Grugliasco (TO), Turin, Italy 4 Graham Sustainability Institute, University of Michigan, 625 E. Liberty St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA 5 Eurac Research, Institute for Alpine Environment, Bolzano (BZ), Italy 6 Alpine Wilidlife Research Centre, Gran Paradiso National Park, Degioz (AO) 11 Valsavarenche, Italy; Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich. Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland 7 School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, Plant Diversity and Ecosystems Management Unit, University of Camerino (MC) Italy 8 Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability University of Parma, Parma, Italy 9 Alpine Wilidlife Research Centre, Gran Paradiso National Park, Degioz (AO) 11 Valsavarenche, Italy 10 Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley, ARPA VdA, Climate Change Unit, Aosta, Italy 11 Department of Biology, University of Roma Tre, Viale G.
    [Show full text]
  • W. L. Cnmrrn Mineralogisk4eologisk Museum, Sa:S' Gate 1, Oslo 5, Norway
    Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 18, pp. 59-70 (1980) CONTACT-METAMORPHICLAPIS LAZULI: THE ITALIAN MOUNTATNDEPOS|T8, COTORADO D. D. HOGARTH Department ol Geology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario KIN 6Ns w. L. cnmrrN Mineralogisk4eologisk Museum, Sa:s' Gate 1, Oslo 5, Norway ABsrRAcr Mots-cl6s:lapis lazuli, Italian Mountain, Colorado, formation Belden, m6tamorphisme de contact, la- In the Italian Mountain area (Colorado), lazurite zurite, m6tasomatisme. formed early, apparently in equilibrium with diop- side, forsterite and perhaps barian phlogopite, whereas grossular formed later. Thomsonite re- INTRoDUcTToN presents a late-stage hydrothermal alteration of lazurite. Thomsonite, chlorite and hisingerite, just Lapis lazuli comprises a group of rare meta- beyond the lapis-lazuli zones, are also late minerals. morphic rocks having lazurite as an essential The deposits resulted from contact metamorphism constituent. The most common type, composed of subgreywacke and dolostone of the Pennsylvanian of coarse-grainedlazurite and diopside and in- Belden Formation by quartz monzonite and quartz diorite of the Tertiary Italian Mountain stocks. Na, terbedded with marble, is remote from any S, Ba, Sr, Cl and F were introduced in aqueous igneousrock that can be related to its formation. magmatic fluids. Early barite may have localized Recently, Kulke (1976a, b) and Hogarth & later barian phlogopite and lazurite. Late introduc- Griffin (1978) proposed that rosks of this type tion of Fe produced the Fe-rich silicates. unusual in Afghanistan and on Baffin Island constitute in lapis lazuli. Peak metamorpbis conditions were meta-evaporitesrecrystallized during high-grade P - 250 bars. T ry 600oC. regional metamorphism. The deposits in Gun- nison County, central Colorado, differ in many Keywords: lapis lazuli, Italian Mountain, Colorado, respects from these.
    [Show full text]
  • 470 Part 294—Special Areas
    § 293.17 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–20 Edition) (iii) The portage from Back Bay to under appropriate conditions deter- Pipestone Bay of Basswood Lake. mined by the Chief, Forest Service. (iv) The portages from Fall Lake to (b) Grazing of domestic livestock, de- Newton Lake to Pipestone Bay of Bass- velopment of water storage projects wood Lake. which do not involve road construc- (v) The portage from Vermilion Lake tion, and improvements necessary for to Trout Lake. the protection of the National Forests (2) The Forest Service may authorize, may be permitted, subject to such re- by special use permit, the use of motor strictions as the Chief, Forest Service, vehicles to transport watercraft over deems desirable. Within Primitive the following portages: Areas, when the use is for other than (i) Four Mile Portage From Fall administrative needs of the Forest Lake to Hoist Bay of Basswood Lake. Service, use by other Federal agencies (ii) Vermilion Lake to Trout Lake. when authorized by the Chief, and in (iii) Prairie Portage from Sucker emergencies, the landing of aircraft Lake to Basswood Lake and the use of motorboats are prohib- (iv) Loon River to Loon Lake and ited on National Forest land or water from Loon Lake to Lac La Croix. unless such use by aircraft or motor- (c) Snowmobile use. (1) A snowmobile boats has already become well estab- is defined as a self-propelled, motorized lished, the use of motor vehicles is pro- vehicle not exceeding forty inches in hibited, and the use of other motorized width designed to operate on ice and equipment is prohibited except as au- snow, having a ski or skiis in contact thorized by the Chief.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dolomites the World Natural Heritage List Unesco
    THE DOLOMITES THE WORLD NATURAL HERITAGE LIST UNESCO Nomination of the Dolomites for inscription on the World Natural Heritage List UNESCO Odle / Geisler O the mind, mind has mountains; cliffs of fall Frightful, sheer, no-manfathomed. Hold them cheap May who ne’er hung there 2 G.M. Hopkins (1844 - 1889) Nomination of the Dolomites for inscription on the World Natural Heritage List UNESCO THE TENTATIVE LIST AND THE NOMINATION OF THE DOLOMITES This Nomination Document is the answer to the Decision to defer the previous nomination of the Dolomites (2005) expressed by the World Heritage Commit- tee during the Thirty-first Session Christchurch, New Zealand (23 June – 2 July 2007). In detail, the World Heritage Committee having examined Documents WHC-07/31. COM/8B and WHC-07/31.COM/INF.8B.2, defers the examination of the nomina- tion of The Dolomites, Italy, to the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (vii) and (viii). As outlined in the document licensed by the Word Heritage Committee at the end of the 29th session held in Durban, South Africa, in July 2005, Italy has proposed the Dolomites as one of the sites deserving consideration for a possible future nomination as a site of outstanding universal value. The request was included in annex 1 of the Tentative List dated march 31st 2005, whereas the denomination ‘Dolomites’ is defined in annex 2 “Tentative List Sub- mission in accordance with decision 27 Com 8a” and annex 3 (Properties ac- cepted as meeting the requirements for Tentative List), within the scope of the broader denomination ‘Alps’, which also includes a) Western Alps and c) Eastern Alps, under the category ‘Natural Sites’.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Collegiate Peaks Wilderness Area and the Grizzly Peak Caldera, Sa Watch Range, Central Colorado
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE COLLEGIATE PEAKS WILDERNESS AREA AND THE GRIZZLY PEAK CALDERA, SAWATCH RANGE, CENTRAL COLORADO By C.J. Fridrich, Ed DeWitt, Bruce Bryant, Steve Richard, and R.P. Smith Pamphlet to accompany MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATIONS SERIES MAPI-2565 1998 CONTENTS Explanatory notes 1 Description of Map Units 1 Acknowledgments 26 References Cited 26 FIGURES 3. Summary geochemical diagrams for rocks of the Grizzly Peak caldera. 2 4. Summary geochemical diagrams for Cretaceous and Tertiary intrusive rocks in the Aspen area. 6 5. Summary geochemical diagrams for the Italian Mountain intrusive complex. 7 6. Summary geochemical diagrams for altered intrusive rocks at Middle Mountain and Winfield Peak. 8 7. Summary geochemical diagrams for rocks of the Mount Champion area. 9 8. Summary geochemical diagrams for intrusive rocks of the Mount Princeton Pluton. 10 9. Summary geochemical diagrams for intrusive rocks of the Twin Lakes Pluton. 11 10. 40Ar- 39Ar release spectra for hornblende from sample R8-28-84-4 of mafic border of Twin Lakes pluton. Width of bars on spectra is 2-sigma uncertainty. 13 11. Summary geochemical diagrams for Cretaceous plutons east of the Twin Lakes pluton. 15 12. Summary geochemical diagrams for 1.4-Ga plutons and plutons assumed to be 1.4 Gain the central Sawatch Range area. 17 13. Concordia diagram for zircon from sample IC-6 of the St. Kevin Granite. Size of symbol represents 2-sigma analytical uncertainty. 18 14. Summary geochemical diagrams for some 1.65-Ga and older plutons in the central Sawatch Range area.
    [Show full text]