2014 Executive 57-78.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Case: 19-30353 Document: 00514971298 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/24/2019 No. 19-30353 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit In re: Rebekah Gee, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health; James E. Stew- art, Sr., in his official capacity as District Attorney for Caddo Parish, Petitioners, June Medical Services, L.L.C., on behalf of its patients, physicians, and staff, doing business as Hope Medical Group for Women; John Doe 1, Doctor, on behalf of them- selves and their patients; John Doe 3, Doctor, on behalf of themselves and their patients, Plaintiffs, v. Rebekah Gee, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health; James E. Stewart, Sr., in his official capacity as District Attorney for Caddo Parish, Defendants. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (Baton Rouge) No. 3:17-cv-00404-BAJ-RLB BRIEF FOR THE STATES OF TEXAS AND MISSISSIPPI AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Ken Paxton Kyle D. Hawkins Attorney General of Texas Solicitor General [email protected] Jeffrey C. Mateer First Assistant Attorney General Heather Gebelin Hacker Beth Klusmann Office of the Attorney General Assistant Solicitors General P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059) Austin, Texas 78711-2548 Tel.: (512) 936-1700 Counsel for Amici Curiae Fax: (512) 474-2697 Case: 19-30353 Document: 00514971298 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/24/2019 Certificate of Interested Persons No. 19-30353 In re: Rebekah Gee, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health; James E. -
State of Mississippi AUDIT EXCEPTIONS REPORT
State of Mississippi AUDIT EXCEPTIONS REPORT Fiscal Year 2013 Stacey E. Pickering State Auditor Office of the State Auditor Office of the State Auditor Financial and Compliance Division Investigations Law Enforcement Division Performance Audit Division Property Division A legally mandated account of misappropriated or misspent public funds and the actions taken by the Office of the State Auditor for their recovery and their return to the appropriate entities in Fiscal Year 2013. AUDIT EXCEPTIONS REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2013 PUBLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS 7-7-77, 7-7-79, 7-7-217 AND 7-7-219 MISSISSIPPI CODE ANNOTATED (1972) STACEY E. PICKERING STATE AUDITOR The Office of the State Auditor does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, age or disability. OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR STACEY E. PICKERING AUDITOR July 31, 2013 Honorable Phil Bryant, Governor Honorable Tate Reeves, Lieutenant Governor Honorable Lynn Fitch, Treasurer Honorable Philip Gunn, Speaker of the House Honorable Terry W. Brown, President Pro Tempore of the Senate Honorable Greg Snowden, Speaker Pro Tempore of the House Members of the Mississippi State Legislature Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: As you are aware, it is my duty to report to you the specific exceptions taken by the Office of the State Auditor during Fiscal Year 2013, as required by Sections 7-7-77, 7-7-79, 7-7-217 and 7-7-219, Mississippi Code Annotated (1972). This letter is a summary of the Special Report on Audit Exceptions for Fiscal Year 2013. The full report can be accessed on the internet at http://www.osa.state.ms.us/documents/investigative/inv2013.pdf. -
November 8, 2011 General Election Official Results
Page 1 of 13 <HTML> <PRE> SUMMARY REPORT GENERAL ELECTION OFFICIAL RESULTS RUN DATE:08/08/13 NOVEMBER 8, 2011 RUN TIME:02:00 PM VOTES PERCENT PRECINCTS COUNTED (OF 38) . 38 100.00 REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . 88,473 BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. 37,640 VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . 42.54 GOVERNOR TOTAL VOTE FOR 1 PHIL BRYANT (REP). 28,257 76.34 JOHNNY L. DUPREE (DEM) . 8,687 23.47 WRITE-IN. 69 .19 Over Votes . 0 Under Votes . 627 GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE OF REP 06 VOTE FOR 1 PHIL BRYANT (REP). 10,524 82.28 JOHNNY L. DUPREE (DEM) . 2,228 17.42 WRITE-IN. 38 .30 Over Votes . 0 Under Votes . 221 GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE OF REP 07 VOTE FOR 1 PHIL BRYANT (REP). 5,169 78.05 JOHNNY L. DUPREE (DEM) . 1,445 21.82 WRITE-IN. 9 .14 Over Votes . 0 Under Votes . 116 GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE OF REP 08 VOTE FOR 1 PHIL BRYANT (REP). 1,395 74.36 JOHNNY L. DUPREE (DEM) . 480 25.59 WRITE-IN. 1 .05 Over Votes . 0 Under Votes . 31 GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE OF REP 25 VOTE FOR 1 PHIL BRYANT (REP). 3,093 70.65 JOHNNY L. DUPREE (DEM) . 1,284 29.33 WRITE-IN. 1 .02 Over Votes . 0 Under Votes . 83 GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE OF REP 40 VOTE FOR 1 PHIL BRYANT (REP). 3,520 66.43 JOHNNY L. DUPREE (DEM) . 1,770 33.40 WRITE-IN. 9 .17 Over Votes . 0 Under Votes . 92 file://C:\Documents and Settings\mst\Desktop\2011 General Election 8/8/2013 Page 2 of 13 GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE OF REP 52 VOTE FOR 1 PHIL BRYANT (REP). -
TRAP Laws Gain Political Traction While Abortion Clinics—And The
Gut tmacher Policy Review Spring 2013 | Volume 16 | Number 2 GPR TRAP Laws Gain Political Traction While Abortion Clinics— And the Women They Serve—Pay the Price By Rachel Benson Gold and Elizabeth Nash aiting periods. Inaccurate counsel- Abortion Is Safe ing scripts. State-mandated ultra- The rationale behind the campaign to single out sounds. Over the years, these have abortion clinics for special treatment is that abor- Wbeen among the many favored tion is inherently dangerous; however, the facts obstacles antiabortion activists have thrown in say otherwise. Abortion is an extremely safe the path of women seeking to terminate their medical procedure. Less than 0.3% of abortion pregnancies—all under the guise of protecting patients in the United States experience a com- women’s health. Hundreds of these requirements plication that requires hospitalization.1 The risk of are now law across the country at the state level. dying from a legal abortion in the first trimester— And at this point, having mostly exhausted legal when almost nine in 10 abortions in the United means of discouraging women from choosing States are performed—is no more than four in a abortion, opponents recently have stepped up million.2 In fact, the risk of death from childbirth their efforts to block clinics from providing them. is about 14 times higher than that from abortion.3 More than half the states now have laws insti- tuting onerous and irrelevant licensing require- Nearly all U.S. abortions take place in nonhos- ments, known as Targeted Regulation of Abortion pital settings,4 and data going back decades Provider (TRAP) laws, which have nothing to do confirm the safety of these procedures. -
Supreme Court of the United States ———— RIMS BARBER, Et Al., Petitioners, V
No. 17-___ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— RIMS BARBER, et al., Petitioners, v. GOVERNOR PHIL BRYANT, et al., Respondents. ———— On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ———— PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— PAUL SMITH DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR. 600 New Jersey Ave. NW Counsel of Record Washington, DC 20001 GINGER D. ANDERS ADELE M. EL-KHOURI MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 1155 F Street NW 7th Floor Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 220-1100 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners October 10, 2017 ROBERT B. MCDUFF SUSAN L. SOMMER 767 North Congress Street LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & Jackson, MS 39202 EDUCATION FUND, INC. 120 Wall Street, 19th Floor BETH L. ORLANSKY New York, NY 10005 MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE ELIZABETH LITTRELL P.O. Box 1023 LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & Jackson, MS 39215-1023 EDUCATION FUND, INC. 730 Peachtree Street Suite 640 Atlanta, GA 30308 i QUESTIONS PRESENTED In Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015), this Court held that the Constitution entitles same- sex couples to join in civil marriage on the same terms as different-sex couples. In response, Missis- sippi enacted the Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act, Miss. Code Ann. § 11-62-1 et seq. (2016) (“HB 1523”). HB 1523 grants broad immunity to any person who commits enumerated acts of discrimination on the basis of religious beliefs or moral convictions opposing mar- riage of same-sex couples; transgender individuals; and sexual relations outside of a male-female mar- riage. The court of appeals held that petitioners, who do not share the endorsed beliefs, lack standing un- der the Establishment Clause because the religious endorsement takes the form of a statute rather than a religious display that they can physically encoun- ter, and held that they lack standing under the Equal Protection Clause because they have suffered no unequal treatment. -
Barber V. Bryant, No
Case 3:16-cv-00442-CWR-LRA Document 35 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 60 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION RIMS BARBER; CAROL BURNETT; PLAINTIFFS JOAN BAILEY; KATHERINE ELIZABETH DAY; ANTHONY LAINE BOYETTE; DON FORTENBERRY; SUSAN GLISSON; DERRICK JOHNSON; DOROTHY C. TRIPLETT; RENICK TAYLOR; BRANDIILYNE MANGUM- DEAR; SUSAN MANGUM; JOSHUA GENERATION METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH; CAMPAIGN FOR SOUTHERN EQUALITY; and SUSAN HROSTOWSKI CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-417-CWR-LRA V. consolidated with CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-442-CWR-LRA PHIL BRYANT, Governor; JIM HOOD, DEFENDANTS Attorney General; JOHN DAVIS, Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Human Services; and JUDY MOULDER, State Registrar of Vital Records MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The plaintiffs filed these suits to enjoin a new state law, “House Bill 1523,” before it goes into effect on July 1, 2016. They contend that the law violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The Attorney General’s Office has entered its appearance to defend HB 1523. The parties briefed the relevant issues and presented evidence and argument at a joint hearing on June 23 and 24, 2016. The United States Supreme Court has spoken clearly on the constitutional principles at stake. Under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, a state “may not aid, foster, or Case 3:16-cv-00442-CWR-LRA Document 35 Filed 06/30/16 Page 2 of 60 promote one religion or religious theory against another.” Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97, 104 (1968). “When the government acts with the ostensible and predominant purpose of advancing religion, it violates that central Establishment Clause value of official religious neutrality, there being no neutrality when the government’s ostensible object is to take sides.” McCreary Cnty., Kentucky v. -
Volume 79, No. 2 Summer 2016 Mississippi Libraries Vol
Volume 79, No. 2 Summer 2016 Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 2 • Summer 2016 Page 34 A Quarterly Publication of the ISSN 0194-388X Mississippi Library Association ©2016 Editorial Staff Contents President’s Page ................................................................................................ 35 Editor Tina Harry MLA Responds to HB 1523 with Resolution ............................................... 37 Catalog & Asst. Automation Librarian The University of Mississippi National Library Legislative Day ................................................................... 38 [email protected] Mississippi Library Leadership Institute in Action ..................................... 39 Joy Garretson Assistant Editor Tracy Carr A Serials Weeding Project at the Millsaps-Wilson Library ....................... 43 Library Services Bureau Director Mariah Grant Mississippi Library Commission [email protected] Academic Librarian Outreach to Veterans .................................................. 47 Anne Hudson Copy Editor Quantitative Analysis of Published Articles in the Journal of Mississippi Audrey Beach History .............................................................................................................. 49 Resource Librarian Mississippi Delta Community College Indira Bhowal [email protected] People In The News ......................................................................................... 64 News Briefs ...................................................................................................... -
Mississippi 2014.Pdf
STATE PAGES Minnesota Mississippi Nickname ................................................................. The North Star State Nickname ................................................................... The Magnolia State Motto .................................................L’Etoile du Nord (The North Star) Motto ............................................ Virtute et Armis (By Valor and Arms) Flower ........................................................Pink and White Lady-Slipper Flower .......................................................................................... Magnolia Bird .....................................................................................Common Loon Bird ......................................................................................... Mockingbird Tree ............................................................................................... Red Pine Tree ............................................................................................... Magnolia Song ...................................................................................Hail! Minnesota Song .....................................................................................Go, Mississippi Entered the Union ................................................................May 11, 1858 Entered the Union ......................................................December 10, 1817 Capital ............................................................................................. St. Paul Capital .............................................................................................Jackson -
2014 Historical-Statistical Info.Indd
SOS6889 Divider Pages.indd 15 12/10/12 11:32 AM HISTORICAL AND STATISTICAL INFORMATION HISTORICAL AND STATISTICAL INFORMATION Mississippi History Timeline . 743 Historical Roster of Statewide Elected Officials . 750 Historical Roster of Legislative Officers . 753 Mississippi Legislative Session Dates . 755. Mississippi Historical Populations . 757 Mississippi State Holidays . 758 Mississippi Climate Information . 760 2010 U.S. Census – Mississippi Statistics . 761 Mississippi Firsts . 774 742 HISTORICAL AND STATISTICAL INFORMATION MISSISSIPPI HISTORY TIMELINE 1541: Hernando De Soto, Spanish explorer, discovers the Mississippi River. 1673: Father Jacques Marquette, a French missionary, and fur trapper Louis Joliet begin exploration of the Mississippi River on May 17. 1699: First European settlement in Mississippi is established at Fort Maurepas, in present-day Ocean Springs, by Frenchmen Pierre Le Moyne d’Iberville and his brother, Jean Baptiste de Bienville. 1716: Bienville establishes Fort Rosalie on the site of present-day Natchez. 1718: Enslaved Africans are brought to Mississippi by the Company of the West. 1719: Capital of the Louisiana colony moves from Mobile to New Biloxi, present-day Biloxi. 1729: The Natchez massacre French settlers at Fort Rosalie in an effort to drive out Europeans. Hundreds of slaves were set free. 1754: French and Indian War begins. 1763: Treaty of Paris ends the French and Indian War with France giving up land east of the Mississippi, except for New Orleans, to England. 1775: The American Revolution begins with many loyalists fleeing to British West Florida, which included the southern half of present-day Mississippi. 1779- 1797: Period of Spanish Dominion with Manuel Gayosa de Lemos chosen governor of the Natchez region. -
Upfor the Challenge
UPFOR THE CHALLENGE THE ANNUAL REPORT ON PHILANTHROPY FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI OLE MISS ATHLETICS FOUNDATION MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION TOTAL ENDOWMENT BENEFITING PRIVATE SUPPORT THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 TOTAL PRIVATE SUPPORT: TOTAL ENDOWMENT: $133.2 MILLION $606 MILLION $5 MILLION 37.5% Deferred and planned gift Academic and Program Support 37% Scholarship Support $30.4 MILLION New pledges receivable in future years 4.2% Faculty Support Library Support $97.8 MILLION 21.3% Cash and realized gifts RECENT PRIVATE SUPPORT IN MILLIONS $60.7 $68.2 $65.2 $80.3 $78 $69.1 $67.8 $122.6 $114.6 $118 $133.2 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TABLEOF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE CHANCELLOR ............................................. 2 MESSAGE FROM OLE MISS ATHLETICS FOUNDATION CHAIR ................................................ 48 Introduction: Up for the Challenge ................................................... 4 Ole Miss Athletics: Major Gifts .................................................................................. 10 Year Brings Tremendous Achievements, Donors ............................... 50 Recognition: Applauding Student-Athlete Achievements by Sport .......................... 54 MESSAGE FROM UM FOUNDATION BOARD CHAIR ..................... 20 Ole Miss Athletics Leadership ...................................................... 64 UM Foundation: Support Combines to Produce Excellence .............. -
Amicus Brief for Indiana Tech Law School
No. 15-274 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- WHOLE WOMAN’S HEALTH, et al., Petitioners, v. KIRK COLE, Commissioner, Texas Department of State Health Services, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OUT OF TIME AND BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE INDIANA TECH LAW SCHOOL AMICUS PROJECT IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ADAM LAMPARELLO Counsel of Record INDIANA TECH LAW SCHOOL AMICUS PROJECT 1600 East Washington Blvd. Fort Wayne, IN 46803 [email protected] 260.422.5561, ext. 3450 ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM 1 MOTION OF INDIANA TECH LAW SCHOOL AMICUS PROJECT TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF OUT OF TIME IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37.3(a), the Indiana Tech Law School Amicus Project moves for leave to file an amicus brief out of time in support of the Petitioners. Counsel for both parties have con- sented to the filing of the accompanying brief, Peti- tioners via telephone and Respondents via email. Three copies of the amicus brief have been sent via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties of record. An electronic copy of the amicus brief was also sent to the Court on January 12, 2016. On November 13, 2015, the Court granted certio- rari in this matter, and on December 28, 2015, coun- sel for Petitioners filed their merits brief. Thus, under Rule 37.3(a), the deadline to file amicus briefs in support of Petitioners was January 4, 2016. -
RESEARCH PAPER “THE LAST ABORTION CLINIC” by Raney
RESEARCH PAPER “THE LAST ABORTION CLINIC” By Raney Aronson Please note this is for internal use only – not to be published, as it has not been thoroughly fact checked. This information has been culled from original reporting done during research, newspaper articles/periodicals, and past interviews I conducted for “The Jesus Factor,” which we will undoubtedly choose to update for this film. Additionally, for purposes of this research paper, I have adopted the following terminology: pro life/ opponents of abortion or pro choice. There are many other terms used, and while pro life and pro choice are also politically motivated titles, they seem to be the best choices for now – later in the process, we should discuss what we want to use for the broadcast. The purpose of “The Last Abortion Clinic” is to explore abortion politics today by looking at both the national and the state level. National On a national level, the film will focus on the pro-life movement’s strategy to redefine when “life” and/or “personhood” begins with the eventual goal of undermining the ever-controversial 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade. William Saletan, the author of “Bearing Right: How Conservatives Won the Abortion War” told us, “what is key to understanding what’s different about abortion politics today is that the Conservative movement has successfully shifted the debate from a woman’s right to choose to the right of the fetus – in other words her ‘unborn child’s’ rights.” This means, in essence, he explains, “now there is a competition between the woman or her ‘unborn child’ in terms of rights – and if a fetus is ultimately defined as a person then abortion rights will most certainly be up for grabs.” Richard Land, in a 2004 interview, said, “we are trying to change the hearts and minds of Americans by talking about the unborn child as a person who deserves the same rights as all Americans, and by doing this we will capture the American spirit.” States With eight of nine U.S.