DOCSLIB.ORG

Genetics, IQ, Determinism, and Torts: the Example of Discovery in Lead Exposure Litigation Jennifer Wriggins University of Maine School of Law, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genetics, IQ, Determinism, and Torts: the Example of Discovery in Lead Exposure Litigation Jennifer Wriggins University of Maine School of Law, Wriggins@Maine.Edu University of Maine School of Law University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1997 Genetics, IQ, Determinism, and Torts: The Example of Discovery in Lead Exposure Litigation Jennifer Wriggins University of Maine School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/faculty- publications Part of the Law Commons Suggested Bluebook Citation Jennifer Wriggins, Genetics, IQ, Determinism, and Torts: The Example of Discovery in Lead Exposure Litigation, 75 B.U. L. Rev. 1025 (1997). Available at: http://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/faculty-publications/41 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENETICS, IQ, DETERMINISM, AND TORTS: THE EXAMPLE OF DISCOVERY IN LEAD EXPOSURE LffiGATION JENNIFER WRIGGINS" INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1026 I. EFFECTS OF LEAD EXPOSURE ............................................. 1031 II. GENETIC EsSENTIAliSM AND MATERNAL DETERMINISM ............ 1034 A. Genetic Research, Genetic Essentialism, and their Implica­ tions ................................................................. ..... 1034 1. Introduction......................................................... 1034 2. Genetic Narratives and Genetic Essentialism ................. 1036 3. Research in Genetics and the Pressure to Expand Testing and Other Inquiries................................................ 1037 4. Testing Non-Parties and Seeking Non-Parties' Personal Records Based on Genetic Arguments ......................... 1039 B. Maternal Determinism and its Implicarions ....................... 1041 ill. IQ REsEARCH: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND CURRENT MANIFESTATIONS ........................................................... 1044 A. Historical Background ................................................ 1045 B. Heritability ......................................:....................... 1048 C. Bias ....................................................................... 1049 D. The Uses ofJQ.......................................................... 1052 IV. THE D ISCOVERY SHIFT FROM THE Pl.AINTIFF TO TilE MOTHER AND FAMILY ................................................................. 1055 A. The Plaintiff-Centered Discovery Framework ..................... lOSS B. Departures from the Plaintiff-Centered Discovery Framework 1058 • Associate Professor of Law, University of Maine School of Law; B.A., Yale College; J.D., Harvard Law School. I am grateful to many people for assistance in writing this Article. 'Thanks to The Law & Society Association for allowing me to present an early draft at the 1995 conference in Toronto. I received insightful comments. on drafts from Martha Cbamallas, Deborah Denno, Elizabeth Jester, Karen Kruskal, Dr. Francesca LaVecchio, Lois Lupica, Martha McCluskey, Ruth Miner, Dr. Herbert Needleman, Sive Neilan, Kurt Pressman, and Dean Donald N. Zillman. Tara Healy was helpful and gener­ ous with her time and expertise. For outstanding research assistance, I thank Rebekah Smith. For logistical assistance, I appreciate the help of Ruth Miner and Donna Jones. Mary L. Bonauto reviewed many drafts and provided support in many ways. 'Thanks also to Article Editor Dawn Horrocks and the Editors of the Boston University Law Review. I was involved in litigating lead exposure cases for children alleged to be injured by lead exposure for four years. General thanks also to my former law panners Kun M. Press­ man and Karen L. Kruslcal. 1025 1026 BOSTON UNIVERSrrY LAW REVIEW [Vol. 77:1025 1. Broadening Scope of Litigation ................................. 1060 2. Intrusion............................................................. 1061 3. The Scientific Basis for Departures from Plaintiff- Centered Discovery is not Clearly Establisped ............... 1067 4. Rule 35 and Judges' Power to Compel Non-Parties in Civil Cases to Submit to Examination and Testing .......... 1070 a. Past Challenges to Rule 35.................................. 1011 b. Testing ofPersons other than the Lead-Exposed Child Despite Rule 35 ............................................... 1073 i. The Inherent Powers Argument ....................... 1074 ii. The Due Process Argument ............................ 1077 c. A Thought Experiment ....................................... 1079 v. FUTURE DIRECTIONS ....................................................... 1079 A. Introduction and the Happiness Set Point ......................... 1079 B. The Cu"ent Discovery Framework's Protection of lndividu­ als.........................................................................108l C. A Preliminary Proposa/ ............................................... 1086 CONCLUSION ......................................................................... 1088 INTRODUCTION In a disturbing development in tort litigation, defendants use detenninistic, genetics-based ideas about individuals and their families to undercut and de­ flect attention from personal injury claims. This development has arisen in lead exposure litigation, which generally involves claims for cognitive inju­ ries I brought on behalf of children who have ingested lead paint. 2 The most extreme manifestation of this development to date has been the efforts in several states to compel non-party relatives of lead-exposed children to sub­ mit to IQ and· psychological testing. 3 1 Numerous studies show that lead exposure causes cognitive injuries in children, in­ cluding brain injury, lowered IQ, and death. See infra notes 27-34 and accompanying text (discussing the hannful effects of lead exposure in children). 2 Ingestion ofold, chipping paint and paint dust is the major source of lead for children. See CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, U.S. DEP'T OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVS., PREVENTING LEAD POISONING IN YOUNG CHILDREN 18-19 (1991) [hereinafter CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL) (stating that lead-based paint remains the major source of lead exposure for young children, and explaining that children ingest lead paint when they ingest dust and soil contaminated with lead from paint that flaked or chalked as it aged); Jane E. Schukoske, The Evolving Paradigm of lAws on Lead-Based Pain/: From Code Viololion to Environmental HazJJrd, 45 S.C. L. REV. 511, 515-16 (1994) (noting that resi· dential lead, including lead-based paint, threatens young children). This litigation is gen­ erally brought on behalf of lead-exposed children against landlords of properties where lead paint has been found. See SEAN F. MOONEY, INSURANCE INFORMATION INSTITUTE, LEAD LIABILITY (1995), reprinted in 4 MEALEY'S LITIG. REP., LEAD 15, at C2 (May 3, 1995) (noting that the typical lawsuit is brought against the landlord of the residence of the lead-exposed child). 3 See infra notes 156-60 and accompanying text (discussing cases from the District of 1997] GENE17CS, IQ, DETERMINISM. AND TORTS 1027 The Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services called lead poisoning "the No. 1 environmental threat to the health of children in the United States. "4 Lead poisoning affects African-American children in numbers disproportionate to their numbers in the population. s Although federal law bas banned lead paint for residential use since 1978,6 it continues to be the subject of a significant amount of legislation.7 In addi­ tion, a substantial amount of litigation is brought against landlords for chil­ dren's lead-related injuries,8 and a 1995 insurance industry report predicted massive claims in the future. 9 To date, however, relatively little legal schol­ arship has been published in this area. 10 Columbia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York, in which defendants have sought the IQ testing of the plaintiffs' non-pany relatives). Defendants have also sought to compel production of medical, educational, and employment records of the plaintiffs' relatives. See infra note 169 and accompanying text (discussing cases involving production of the personal records of plaintiffs' relatives). 4 Louis Sullivan, Speech at First Annual Conference on Childhood Lead Poisoning (Oct. 7, 1991), in WASH . TIMES, Oct. 8, 1991, at A4. ~ See infra note 20 and accompanying text (discussing surveys of the incidence of blood lead levels in children and finding that the incidence is significantly higher among African­ American children than among white children) . 6 See CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL, supra note 2, at 18 (noting that interior lead­ ~ paint was available until the 1970s). 7 See, e.g., 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 4851-4856 (West 1995) (Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992). About half of the states have statutes dealing with lead paint and lead ingestion. See Jennifer Bush, The Federal uad Poisoning Prevention Pro­ gram: Inadequate Guidance for an Erpeditious Solution, 23 B.C. ENVTL. AFF. L. REv. 645, 649-50 (1996) (noting that as of 1994, 25 states had legislation regulating lead-based paint for residential housing). • Lead poisoning cases for injuries to children have gone to trial in at least ten states. See generally Sonja Larsen, Annotation, Landlord's Liability for Injury or Death of Ten­ ant's Child from Lead Paint Poisoning, 19 A.L.R. 5TH 405, 412-38 (1995) (discussing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Miracle Diets Aren't Fair to Anyone
    comment‘ We shouldn’t simply use anecdotes as the basis for changing practice, leaving ‘it to others to find actual evidence NO HOLDS BARRED Margaret McCartney Miracle diets aren't fair to anyone n the world of nutrition, “low carb and key foods or food vouchers. Both and high fat” diets are a growing groups lost weight, marginally more in trend. Big claims are made, the low carb group, but the difference in including from doctors, that these HbA1c between the groups did not reach can “save your life,” “reverse significance. Itype 2 diabetes,” and, of course, help A 2017 systematic review, meanwhile, you lose weight. So, should GPs start found no long term difference between recommending low carbohydrate diets to high and low carb diets in glycaemic people who want to lose weight or who control, weight, or low density have type 2 diabetes? lipoprotein cholesterol. The low carb Criticism of the status quo is diet did, however, allow for more people reasonable. By its nature, diet research to use less medication: the average contains many uncertainties, with few long term improvement was 0.34% lower HbA1c. randomised controlled trials. But doctors, researchers, None of this negates the experience of people who and guideline committees can surely aspire to do better. dedicate themselves to a major dietary change of the low Many in the low carb lobby have been highly critical of carb type and are successful in the long term. It does current government dietary guidance. Some legitimately mean, however, that there isn’t one big, miracle diet fix.
    [Show full text]
  • On Being a Whistleblower: the Needleman Case
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 3(1), 73-93 Copyright O 1993, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. On Being a Whistleblower: The Needleman Case Claire B. Ernhart Case Western Reserve University Sandra Scarr University of Virginia David F. Geneson Hunton & Williams We believe that members of the scientific community have a primary obligation to promote integrity in research and that this obligation includes a duty to report observations that suggest misconduct to agencies that are empowered to examine and evaluate such evidence. Consonant with this responsibility, we became whistleblowers in the case of Herbert Needleman. His 1979 study (Needleman et al., 1979), on the effects of low-level lead exposure on children, is widely cited and highly influential in the formulation of public policy on lead. The opportunity we had to examine subject selection and data analyses from this study was prematurely halted by efforts to prevent disclosure of our obser- vations. Nevertheless, what we saw left us with serious concerns. We hope that the events here summarized will contribute to revisions of process by which allegations of scientific misconduct are handled and that such revisions will result in less damage to scientists who speak out. Downloaded by [New York University] at 21:22 06 January 2015 Key words: misconduct, misrepresentation, due process, whistleblower The increasing incidence of reports of scientific misconduct is troublesome to the public as well as to the scientific community. Even a few instances of misconduct can erode public trust in science. If we are to sustain the respect of the public when there are allegations of misdeeds, procedures for evaluating evidence must be credible (Teich & Frankel, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Poisoning
    3 Dec 2003 21:51 AR AR206-ME55-13.tex AR206-ME55-13.sgm LaTeX2e(2002/01/18) P1: GBC 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103653 Annu. Rev. Med. 2004. 55:209–22 doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103653 Copyright c 2004 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved First published online as a Review in Advance on Aug. 18, 2003 LEAD POISONING Herbert Needleman Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; email: [email protected] ■ Abstract Understanding of lead toxicity has advanced substantially over the past three decades, and focus has shifted from high-dose effects in clinically symptomatic individuals to the consequences of exposure at lower doses that cause no symptoms, particularly in children and fetuses. The availability of more sensitive analytic methods has made it possible to measure lead at much lower concentrations. This advance, along with more refined epidemiological techniques and better outcome measures, has lowered the least observable effect level until it approaches zero. As a consequence, the segment of the population who are diagnosed with exposure to toxic levels has expanded. At the same time, environmental efforts, most importantly the removal of lead from gasoline, have dramatically reduced the amount of lead in the biosphere. The remaining major source of lead is older housing stock. Although the cost of lead paint abatement is measured in billions of dollars, the monetized benefits of such a Herculean task have been shown to far outweigh the costs. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the focus in lead poisoning has shifted away from adults exposed to high doses in industrial settings to the larger population of asymptomatic chil- dren with lesser exposures.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbert Needleman
    Special Report on Lead Poisoning in Children Standing Up to the Lead Industry: An Interview with Herbert Needleman INTRODUCTION David Rosner, PhDa,b Gerald Markowitz, PhDa,c Herbert Needleman, MD, is a pioneer in the history of medicine who has helped transform our understanding of the effect of lead on children’s health. In the 1970s, he revolutionized the field by documenting the impact of low lead exposure on the intellec- tual development and behavior of children. In 1979, he published a highly influential study in the New England Journal of Medicine1 that transformed the focus of lead research for the next generation and played a critical role in the elimination of lead in gasoline and the lowering of the CDC’s blood lead standard for children. Building on a study by Byers and Lord in 1943 and those of Julian Chisolm and others in the 1950s and 1960s, which had documented a variety of chronic damage affecting children who showed acute symptoms of lead poisoning, Needleman’s innova- tive study analyzed the lead content of the teeth of schoolchildren, correlating it with the children’s behavior, IQ, and school performance. Not surprisingly, Needleman became the focus of the lead industry’s ire. Beginning in the early 1980s, the industry’s attacks on his research and use of public relations firms and scientific consultants to under- mine his credibility became a classic example of how an industry seeks to shape science and call into question the credibility of those whose research threatens it. Industry consultants demanded that the Environ- mental Protection Agency and, later, the Office of Scientific Integrity at the National Institutes of Health, investigate Needleman’s work.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Racism and the Legal Prohibitions Against Miscegenation
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 5 2000 Blood Will Tell: Scientific Racism and the Legal Prohibitions Against Miscegenation Keith E. Sealing John Marshall Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Race Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Keith E. Sealing, Blood Will Tell: Scientific Racism and the Legal Prohibitions Against Miscegenation, 5 MICH. J. RACE & L. 559 (2000). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol5/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLOOD WILL TELL: SCIENTIFIC RACISM AND THE LEGAL PROHIBITIONS AGAINST MISCEGENATION Keith E. Sealing* INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 560 I. THE PARADIGM ............................................................................ 565 A. The Conceptual Framework ................................ 565 B. The Legal Argument ........................................................... 569 C. Because The Bible Tells Me So .............................................. 571 D. The Concept of "Race". ...................................................... 574 II.
    [Show full text]
  • K I R T LAN D I A, the Cleveland Museum of Natural History
    K I R T LAN D I A, The Cleveland Museum of Natural History September 2006 Number 55: J -42 T. WINGATE TODD: PIO~EER OF MODERN AMERICAN PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY KEVI~ F. KER~ Department of History The University of Akron. Akron. Ohio 44325-1902 kkern@ uakron.edu ABSTRACT T. Wingate Todd's role in the development of modern American physical anthropology \\as considerably more complex and profound than historians have previously recognized. A factor of the idiosyncrasies of his life and research. this relative neglect of Todd is symptomatic of a larger underappreciation of the field' s professional and intellectual development in the early twentieth century. A complete examination of Todd's life reveals that he played a crucial role in the discipline's evolution. On a scholarly le\·el. his peers recognized him as one of the most important men in the field and rarely challenged his yoluminous \Yj'itten output. which comprised a significant portion of the period's literature. On a theoretical leveL Todd led nearly all of his contemporaries in the eventual turn the field made away from the ethnic focus of its racialist roots and the biological determinism of the eugenics movement. Furthermore. he anticipated the profound theoretical and methodological changes that eventually put physical anthropology on its present scientific footing. His research collections are the largest of their kind in the world, and still quite actiYely used by contemporary researchers. Many of Todd' s publications from as early as the 1920s (especially those concerning age changes. grO\\th. and development) are still considered standard works in a field that changed dramatically after his death.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Herbert Needleman, MD
    Can a malpractice insurance company be this protective? In a world where insurance companies often choose settlements instead of aggressive defense, The Doctors Company prides itself on vigorously putting your reputation first. That’s why, when plaintiffs filed over 1,000 breast implant claims against physicians covered by The Doctors Company, none resulted in verdicts against the doctors. Protection both comforting and ferocious—what else would you expect from a medical malpractice insurance company called The Doctors Company? More than 10,000 of your California colleagues already know—we’re a national company with local presence, standing ready to serve you. To learn more, visit us on the Web at www.thedoctors.com or call us at (800) 862-0375. 2 SAN FRANCISCO MEDICINE / JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2006 http://www.sfms.org January / February 2006, Vol. 79, No. 1 Environmental Health and Medicine Feature Articles MEMBER SERVICES 4 On Your Behalf 11 The Mainstreaming of Environmental Medicine and Health Philip R. Lee, MD and Steve Heilig, MPH 43 In Memoriam 43 Calendar of Events 12 Toward an Ecological View: Complex Systems, Health and Disease Ted Schettler, MD, MPH MONTHLY COLUMNS 16 Air Pollution and Heart Disease: Recent Developments Michael Lipsett, MD 7 President’s Message Gordon L. Fung, MD 18 Environmental Contaminants and Human Fertility 9 Editorial Linda C. Giudice, MD, PhD, Alison Carlson and Mary Wade Mike Denney, MD, PhD 20 Standing Up to the Lead Industry: 40 Hospital News An Interview with Herbert Needleman, MD 23 Chemical Exposure and Parkinson’s Disease: A Plethora of Suspects Editorial and Advertising Offices Jackie Hunt Christensen and Deborah Cory-Slechta, PhD 1003 A O’Reilly San Francisco, CA 94129 25 The Real Rx: Slow Food, Lively Places, Real Vitality Phone 415/561-0850, ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Be Against Darwin? Creationism, Racism, and the Roots of Anthropology
    YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 55:95–104 (2012) Why Be Against Darwin? Creationism, Racism, and the Roots of Anthropology Jonathan Marks* Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223 KEY WORDS History; Anthropology; Scientific racism; Eugenics; Creationism ABSTRACT In this work, I review recent works in G. Simpson and Morris Goodman a century later. This science studies and the history of science of relevance to will expose some previously concealed elements of the biological anthropology. I will look at two rhetorical prac- tangled histories of anthropology, genetics, and evolu- tices in human evolution—overstating our relationship tion—particularly in relation to the general roles of race with the apes and privileging ancestry over emergence— and heredity in conceptualizing human origins. I argue and their effects upon how human evolution and human that scientific racism and unscientific creationism are diversity have been understood scientifically. I examine both threats to the scholarly enterprise, but that scien- specifically the intellectual conflicts between Rudolf tific racism is worse. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 55:95–104, Virchow and Ernst Haeckel in the 19th century and G. 2012. VC 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Because the methods of science are so diverse It is actually no great scandal to reject science. In the (including observation, experimental manipulation, quali- first place, nobody rejects all science; that person exists tative data collection, quantitative data analysis, empiri- only in the imagination of a paranoiac. In the second cal, and hermeneutic research; and ranging from the syn- place, we all have criteria for deciding what science to chronic and mechanistic to the diachronic and historical), reject—at very least, we might generally agree to reject it has proven to be difficult to delimit science as practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Round and Round It Goes: the Epidemiology of Childhood Lead Poisoning, 1950-1990
    Round and Round It Goes: The Epidemiology of Childhood Lead Poisoning, 1950-1990 BARBARA BERNEY Boston University { { TT EAD IS TOXIC WHEREVER IT IS FOUND, AND IT I is found everywhere. ” The 1988 report to Congress on lead 1 4 poisoning in children by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (1988) thus neatly summarized the last 25 years of epidemiological (and toxicological) studies of lead. Lead has been a known poison for thousands of years. The ancient Greeks described some of the classical signs and symptoms of lead poi­ soning: colic, constipation, pallor, and palsy (Lin-fu 1980). Some histor­ ians suggest that lead acetate used by the Romans to process wine contributed to the fall of the Empire (Mack 1973). Despite its known toxicity, lead use in the United States increased enormously from the in­ dustrial revolution through the 1970s, especially after World War II. Be­ tween 1940 and 1977, the annual consumption of lead in the United States almost doubled. In the 1980s, largely as a result of regulation of lead in gasoline, lead use in the United States leveled off and began to decrease. In this article I explore the interaction of epidemiology and social forces in the continuing evolution of knowledge about the effects of low- level lead exposure, the extent of the population’s exposure, and the sources of that exposure. I will concentrate on the effects of lead on the central nervous system (CNS) of children. The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 71, No. 1, 1993 © 1993 Milbank Memorial Fund 3 4 Barbara Berney In the United States, the problem of lead poisoning and low-level lead exposure has been pursued with some consistency over the last 25 to 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Misconduct
    Letters to the Editor areas, we recognize the public health The final report ofthat inquiry found threat of dispensing mercury. However, Blood Lead Levels, "no evidence of deliberate falsification," we recommend also that the dangers of Scientific Misconduct, as selectively quoted in the Journal ar- mercury be sensitively separated from the and the Needleman Case ticle, but did find "a deliberate misrepre- social-psychological benefits of spiritual- sentation of procedures." This part of the ism. In inner-city Hispanic communities, finding was omitted from Silbergeld's espintsmo is an indigenous source of 1. A Reply from the Lead article. The report concluded that "Dr. community socialization and support. Needleman was deliberately misleading Spiritualists frequently represent the first Industry in the published accounts of the proce- dures used in the line of extrafamilial mental health inter- Together, industry, government, and 1979 study." The board vention. Since botanicas also sell medici- unanimously recommended that Dr the public health community have made Needleman submit corrective statements nal plants and herbal remedies, they offer great progress in reducing blood lead some basic health care familiar to the to the journals in which his original levels in this country. It is regrettable that studies were published and that he make cultures of Latin America. Therefore, a supposedly peer-reviewed journal with his complete data set available to any public health interventions must be aimed the stature of the American Joumal of investigator. The Office ofResearch Integ- at helping spiritualists find safe alterna- Public Health would choose to print the rity reiterated these same findings in its tives to mercury.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME PS 019 125 the Nature And
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 324 135 PS 019 125 TITLE The Nature and Extent of Lead Poisoning in Children in tLe United States: A Report to Congress. INSTITUTION Agency for Toxic Substaaces and Disease Registry (DHHS/PHS), Atlanta, GA. PUB CATE Jul 88 NOTr' 603p. PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF03/PC25 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS At Risk Persons; *Child Health; Females; Hazardous Materials; *Incidence; Intervention; *Lead Poisoning; *Metabolism; National Surveys; *Pollution; *Pregnancy; Public Health; Regional Characteristics; Research Methodology; Research Needs; Tables (Data); Toxicology; Wastes ICENTIFIERS Pollutant Concentrations; *Pollutants; Screening Programs; Soil Restoration ABcTRAC- This national study on lead poisoning in children is organized in three parts. Part 1 provides an executive summary. Part 2 presents background information, an overview, findings, and conclusions. Part 3, which constitut.as the bulk of the report, discusses terms, issues, and findings concerning lead metabolism, its relationship tc lead exposure and adverse effects of lead, and adver..e health effects of lead in relationship to public health rick and societal well-being. Also discussed are the number of children exposed to lead in the United States; numbers of children exposed to lead according to lead source; numbers of women of child bearing age and pregnant women exposed to lead; low-level lead sources and children's aggregate exp-sure to lead; methods and alternatives for reducing environmental exposure to lead for young children and related risk groups; environmental releases of lead as evaluated under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1966; and exposure to lead and toxicity in children and other related groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Exposure and Behavior: Effects on Antisocial and Risky Behavior Among Children and Adolescents
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES LEAD EXPOSURE AND BEHAVIOR: EFFECTS ON ANTISOCIAL AND RISKY BEHAVIOR AMONG CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS Jessica Wolpaw Reyes Working Paper 20366 http://www.nber.org/papers/w20366 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 August 2014 I would like to thank Claudia Goldin, Jun Ishii, Lawrence Katz, Ronnie Levin, Erzo Luttmer, René Reyes, Steven Rivkin, Katharine Sims, and seminar participants at Amherst College, Clark˛University, Harvard University, RAND, the University of Massachusetts, the University of Delaware, APPAM, the University of Rochester, and the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program in Rochester, New York for valuable advice and comments. Many individuals at government agencies and petroleum industry companies generously provided information on lead in gasoline, and Jenny Ying shared data on teen pregnancy policies. Steve Trask provided excellent research assistance. Any remaining errors are my own. This research was supported by Amherst College and the National Bureau of Economic Research. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2014 by Jessica Wolpaw Reyes. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Lead Exposure and Behavior: Effects on Antisocial and Risky Behavior among Children and Adolescents Jessica Wolpaw Reyes NBER Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]