Birds of the Brigham Young University Campus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Birds of the Brigham Young University Campus Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1956-06-01 Birds of the Brigham Young University campus Barid Baran Mukherjee Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Mukherjee, Barid Baran, "Birds of the Brigham Young University campus" (1956). Theses and Dissertations. 7832. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7832 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. BIRDS 01'~ THE BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY CAMPUS A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Z,oology and Entomology Brigham Young University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of iV[ast.er of Science by Barid Baran Mukherjee June 1956 ACKNOV,·LEDGEMENTS The completion of this thesis, to a large extent, was possible because of the aid and assistance of several persons, and the writer here wishes to acknowledge very gratefully their contribution and expresses his deep appreciation to each one of them. The writer finds it difficult to express in words his sincere gratitude a-nd deep appreciation to Dr. C. Lynn Hayward, his Committee Chairman, who spent much of his precious time in helping and guiding this work, and without whose constant encouragement and assistance it would have been impossible for the writer to carry on and complete this study. Appreciation is especially extended to Dr. Lawrence Morris, the writer's committee member, who helped him immeasurably with con- stant encouragement. The author is indebted to Dr. Vas co M. Tanner, the Chairman of the Department of Zoology and Entomology, Brigham Young University, for the many helps and suggestions which he received during this study and for making available his library to complete this problem . .Appreciation is given to Dr. D. Elden Beck, Dr. A. Lester .Allen, and other members of the Zoology Department, who in various ways helped the writer during this study. The writer is also grateful to Dr. Bertrand~~. Harrison, Dr. Howard C. Stutz, Dr. Earl M. Christensen iii of the Botany Department, and Professor Ernest .F. Reimschiissel of the Horticulture Department for helping him in identifying the trees and shrubs of the study area. Finally, the writer wishes to thank Mr. Carr Greer, Campus Engineer, who helped him to prepare the map of the campus, and Mr. Travis Haws, the writer's very close friend and fellow graduate student, who constantly helped him in various ways to complete this study. iv T1U3LI...; OE' CONTENTS Page Li st of Tables . vi List of ll lustrations vii Introduction . 1 Description of the Study Area . 2 ?rocedure and Methods Evaluation of Data . • 15 Check list of Campus Birds . Summary • 47 Bibliography 49 V LIST OF TABLES Table Page I Common Trees of the Brigham Young University Campus . 6 ll Common Shrubs of the Brigham Young University Campus • . • • . 7 Ill a Weather Data of Census Days 13 Illb Weekly Weather Data ..... 14 IV Relative Abundance of Different Species Found on the Campus . • • . • • • • • 20, 21 V Nesting Data • • • 23 vi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1 Aerial Photograph of the Study Area . • . • • . • 4 2 Outline Map of the Study Area Showing Distribution of Species . 10 3 Distribution of Species by Month and Their Relative Abundance . • • . • • • • . • • 16 4 Total Number of Species and the Number of New Arrivals by Month . • . • . • . • . • 17 5 Average Number per Hour by Months of Five Most Common Species . • . • • . • • • . • • • 17 6 Representative Habitats of the Campus . • 24. 25 vii INTRODUCTION Ornithologists are generally interested in studying the bird life of a limited area, in different seasons, due to the fact that it gives so much information regarding the distribution, seasonal variation, food, and nesting habits of different species. Although much work has been done on the birds of Utah by many workers. very little information has been published regarding the bird life of particular areas of Utah Valley. ~Nith the idea of determining the bird population of an area of this valley, which has not been studied before, the Brigham Young University campus was chosen for investigation. Situated on a bench, at the foot of the Wasatch Mountains and facing Provo City to the west and south, the campus seemed to provide an excellent habitat for many birds with its trees and bushy areas, orchards, cultivated lands, fields and lawns, canal and pond, and protection against hunting. In his study, the writer has tried to furnish some information about the bird life of this area, which includes the seasonal distribution, relative abunciance, habitat preference, and a brief account of the activ- ities of different species of birds which visit or live on the Brigham Young University campus from late summer to early spring. The author has also tried to furnish information concerning the deservability of this study area as a bird habitat. l 2 Previous Literature Regarding previously published work in this field, Hayward (1935) has studied the winter bird population in Bear Lake (Idaho), and has compared that with Utah Lake valleys. He (l948) has also studied the winter bird population of the V1,asatch Chaparral. Besides these two pub- lished works, the passerine birds, wintering at Utah Lake, have been studied recently by Murphy (1951). The food habits of English sparrows in central Utah and the food habits of the birds of Utah have also been studied respectively by Liddle (1936) and Frost (1947). Of course, the last two works are not quite applicable to the present area of study. Description of the Study Area The Brigham Young University Campus chosen for this investi- gation is a relatively small area on the northeastern side of the city of Provo, in the east central part of Utah Valley. According to Cottam (1926), "Utah Valley, with its average elevation of 4, 500 feet, occupies about 560 square miles in the north central part of the state of Utah. It lies in the eastern limits of the Great Basin immediately northeast of the intersec- tion of the 40th parallel with the ll2 meridian, and comprises the political division of the state known as Utah County. The valley, which is approx- imately 38 miles long and 15 miles wide, is separated from Salt Lake Valley on the north of Traverse Mountain, and is limited on the south by a group of low hills which form a spur to the East Tintic Mountains near Mount Nebo. :F'lanking the valiey on the west is Lake Mountain which 3 slopes rather gradually from the western shores of Utah Lake to a height of 3, .JuO feet above them. This m.ountain extends in a north-south direc- tion for 15 miles and is connected by low hills, with the east Tintic Moun- tains on the south and the Oquirrh slopes of Utah Valley suddenly termin- ated by the magnificent and picturesque Wasatch Mountains, which rise above the valley floor from heights of 5, uOufeet to more than 7,000 feet, Mt. Timpanogos, with its elevation of 12, 000 feet, overlooks the valley from the northeast and is the northern member of a huge 1nountain cres- cent that skirts Utah Valley on the east. 11 The study area which includes the Brigham Young University campus only, is situated at an elevation of approximately 4, 600 feet, at the foot of the Wasatch Mountains which form the dominant topographical feature of this region. The whole campus can be divided into two levels. The upper level is situated on the Provo bench which was formed by deposits laid down by the Provo River and other mountain streams issuing into ancient Lake Bonneville. The other level is situated about forty feet lower in elevation at the base of this alluvial deposit. The total area of the campus where this study was made is 201 acres, excluding the lower campus which is not adjacent to this area and which was not included in this study. About two-thirds of this area is covered by buildings and lawns. The south, west. and north sides are bordered with roads. Between the upper and lower flats there is a canal, Fig . 1 Aerial P ho to g rap h of t he Stud y Ar ea 5 about eight to ten feet wide and three to four feet deep, running from the northwestern corner, turning tov,ards the south and then to the east . .An important type of vegetation on both sides of this canal is composed of different kinds of trees, n1ixed with shrubs which form dense undergrowth in certain places. Besides this vegetation area, there are two orchards, :mostly of pear trees, one on the north central and the other on the north•weste:rn corner of the carnpus. There are also trees scatter- ed throughout the campus. The open spaces between the buildings are mostly lawns, with a few flower gardens and clumps of shrubs. .Recently- planted saplings are located on the sides of the foot paths. There are also a .few plots of fallow lands near the orchard, on the north side of the cam- pus. Wheat is grown on some of these fields. vVater is always available on the ca:rnpus, and the lawns, fields, and orchards are irrigated very often throughout the sun1mer. The irri- gation canal which passes through the campus furnishes a nearly constant supply of water for birds. There is also a small pond and a marshy area on the southern border of the carripus. Natural food is abundantly available for the birds of the campus.
Recommended publications
  • Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M
    Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center 2 of 142 Report No. UT‐17.XX PROVO-OREM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (TRIP) Prepared for: Utah Department of Transportation Research Division Submitted by: University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center Authored by: Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing Final Report June 2017 ______________________________________________________________________________ Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report 3 of 142 DISCLAIMER The authors alone are responsible for the preparation and accuracy of the information, data, analysis, discussions, recommendations, and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, endorsements, or policies of the Utah Department of Transportation or the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Utah Department of Transportation makes no representation or warranty of any kind, and assumes no liability therefore. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for funding this research through the Utah Transportation Research Advisory Council (UTRAC). We also acknowledge the following individuals from UDOT for helping manage this research: Jeff Harris Eric Rasband Brent Schvanaveldt Jordan Backman Gracious thanks to our paid peer reviewers in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University: Dr. Grant G. Schultz, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE. Dr. Mitsuru Saito, Ph.D, P.E., F. ASCE, F. ITE While not authors, the efforts of the following people helped make this report possible. Data Collection Proof Reading/Edits Ethan Clark Ray Debbie Weaver Thomas Cushing Clint Simkins Jack Egan Debolina Banerjee Katherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Transportation
    Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Denver Airports District Office DRAFT SECTION 303(c)/4(f) DE MINIMIS FINDING For the Provo Municipal Airport City of Provo, Utah County, Utah I. Introduction - Section 4(f) Section 4(f) was initially codified in Title 49 United States Code (USC) § 1653(f) (Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966). In 1983, § 1653(f) was reworded and recodified as Title 49 USC § 303 but is still commonly referred to as Section 4(f). Congress amended Section 4(f) in 2005 when the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was enacted. Section 4(f) declares that “it is the policy of the US Government that special effort should be made to preserve the natural beauty of the countryside and public park and recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and historic sites.” In addition: Section 4(f) prohibits the use of land of significant publicly owned public parks, recreation areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and land of a historic site for transportation projects unless the Administration determines that there is no feasible and prudent avoidance alternative and that all possible planning to minimize harm has occurred. De minimis impacts related to historic sites are defined as the determination of either “no adverse effect” or “no historic properties affected” in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. For publicly owned parks, recreation areas, and wildlife/waterfowl refuges, de minimis impacts are defined as those that do not “adversely affect the activities, features, and attributes” of the Section 4(f) resource.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVO RIVER DELTA RESTORATION PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume I: Chapters 1–5
    PROVO RIVER DELTA RESTORATION PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume I: Chapters 1–5 April 2015 UTAH RECLAMATION 230 South 500 East, #230, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 COMMISSIONERS Phone: (801) 524-3146 – Fax: (801) 524-3148 Don A. Christiansen MITIGATION Brad T. Barber AND CONSERVATION Dallin W. Jensen COMMISSION Dear Reader, April 2015 Attached is the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Provo River Delta Restoration Project (PRDRP). The proposed project would restore a naturally functioning river- lake interface essential for recruitment of June sucker (Chasmistes liorus), an endangered fish species that exists naturally only in Utah Lake and its tributaries. In addition to fulfilling environmental commitments associated with water development projects in Utah and contributing to recovery of an endangered species, the project is intended to help improve water quality on the lower Provo River and to provide enhancements for public recreation in Utah County. Alternative B has been identified as the preferred alternative because it would minimize the amount of private lands that would need to be acquired for the project while still providing adequate space for a naturally functioning river delta and sufficient habitat enhancement for achieving the need for the project. The agencies preparing the Final EIS are the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission (Mitigation Commission), the Central Utah Water Conservancy District, and the Central Utah Project Completion Act (CUPCA) Office of the U.S. Department of the Interior, collectively referred to as the Joint Lead Agencies. The Final EIS, Executive Summary and Technical Reports can be viewed or downloaded from the project website www.ProvoRiverDelta.us or by requesting a copy on CD.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development Commission Launches
    OUR TH YEAR www.slenterprise.com July 5, 2021 Volume , Number 50 $1.50 5O Economic development commission launches Weber & Davis commission will be “solutions-oriented.” tablishing subcommittees that serve as con- CountiesReal Estate Brice Wallace “I’m excited to work with state elect- veners to facilitate policy development. The Enterprise ed leaders, cabinet members, local officials “We’re thrilled to announce the cre- PAGE F1 pages 15-1 and others as we collaborate and create new ation of the new Unified Economic Oppor- A new commission charged with de- pathways to economic success,” Cox said. tunity Commission,” said Dan Hemmert, Sponsored by: veloping, directing and coordinating a The commission will convene stake- executive director of the Governor’s Of- statewide economic development strategy holders to develop solutions to the most fice of Economic Opportunity, or GO Utah. has begun its work. critical topics facing Utah’s economy. It That is the new name for the agency former- The Unified Economic Opportunity will also review and create new economic ly known as the Governor’s Office of Eco- Commission, created by HB348, passed strategies and programs to deal with time- nomic Development, or GOED. pages F1-F8 during the 2021 legislative session, has ly topics. Other purposes of the commis- “This commission will help with the been appointed and was scheduled to have sion include aligning economic efforts and state’s growth, education and workforce its first meeting last week, after The Enter- incentive programs, helping support and prise’s press deadlines. align education and industry partnerships Sponsored by: see COMMISSION page 14 Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVO RIVER DELTA RESTORATION PROJECT Bird-Aircraft Strike Risk Technical Memorandum Prepared for the Final Environmental Impact Statement
    PROVO RIVER DELTA RESTORATION PROJECT Bird-Aircraft Strike Risk Technical Memorandum Prepared for the Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND RELEVANT BACKGROUND .................................................. 1 Description of Project Alternatives ............................................................................................. 6 2.0 METHODS .......................................................................................................................... 7 Describing Existing Bird Communities ...................................................................................... 7 Study Area Bird Surveys ........................................................................................................ 7 Internet and Other Data Sources ............................................................................................. 9 Assessment of Bird-Aircraft Strike Risk .................................................................................. 11 Quantitative Approach .......................................................................................................... 11 Habitat-Based Quasi-Quantitative Approach ....................................................................... 12 3.0 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................... 17 Existing Bird Communities based on Project Area Surveys, Provo’s Wildlife Hazard Assessment, and Bird Strike Reports .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Films in This Cinematic Innovation, New Frontier Is Also a Venue Showcasing Section Will Shape a “Greater” Next Wave in American Cinema
    T U , E C N A D N U S , T R O S E R N I A T N U O M E C N A D N U S F O Y S E T R U O C SUNDANCE INSTITUTE PRESENTS THE SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL ABOUT SUNDANCE INSTITUTE ABOUT SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL Sundance Institute is a nonprofit cultural organization Each January, the Sundance Film Festival attracts the most founded by Robert Redford to advance the work of risk-taking innovative storytellers and adventurous audiences to a 10-day storytellers worldwide. With a range of programs for artists celebration of the best independent filmmaking today. In a and audiences, the Institute provides year-round creative and small mountain town, a diverse range of ideas, stories, artists, financial support for the development and presentation of and film lovers converge to launch the year in culture. original stories for the screen and stage. W ELCOME ST RA NGER N Sundance Institute Presents E E R G R E 2014 Sundance Film Festival EV Here is an overview of the program at this year’s Sundance Film Festival. HA LF NE LSON U .S. DRAMATIC COMPETITION D OCUMENTARY PREMIERES FROM THE COLLECTION SUNDANCE KIDS Presenting the world premieres of 16 narrative feature films, Renowned filmmakers and films about far-reaching subjects Rediscover classic works of independent cinema as the This new section of the Festival is designed for independent the Dramatic Competition offers Festivalgoers a first look at comprise this section highlighting our ongoing commitment to Sundance Film Festival presents films from the vaults of the film’s youngest fans.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Items Proposed for Action and Consideration (Pdf)
    Utah Reclamation Mitigation & Conservation Commission COMMISSIONERS 230 South 500 East Suite 230 Salt Lake City, UT 84102-2045 Brad T. Barber, Chair Phone: (801) 524-3146 – Fax: (801) 524-3148 Robert L. Morgan Gene Shawcroft MEETING AGENDA Monday, September 13, 2021 TIME: 9:30 a.m. LOCATION: Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission, 230 S. 500 East Suite 230, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102 Also available online through Microsoft Teams Click here to join the meeting or type the following into your internet browser: https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup- join/19%3ameeting_MzAwN2ZmNzEtYzFmMS00Y2EwLTg5ODEtNjk5NTgzNjk1ZDI1%40th read.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%220693b5ba-4b18-4d7b-9341- f32f400a5494%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2209fd8a27-76fc-460d-af33-294b0a20928f%22%7d ITEMS ON THE AGENDA FOR ‘ACTION’ AND FOR ‘CONSIDERATION’ MAY BE ACCESSED ON THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE by navigating through mitigationcommission.gov/news Or at https://mitigationcommission.gov/news/pdf/AgreementsProposedForAction- Consideration.pdf 1. WELCOME AND OPENING REMARKS 2. APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MINUTES 3. ITEMS FOR COMMISSION RATIFICATION A. A Resolution concurring in the issuance of the Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for ‘Block Notice 7A-2 Temporary Use in North Utah County’ 4. ITEMS FOR COMMISSION ACTION A. Proposed Modification of Agreement with Provo City for Cooperative Planning, Design, Construction and Funding of the Provo Lakeview Parkway and Trail PRDRP B. Proposed Agreement with USDA-Wildlife Services for Funding Wildlife Hazard Mitigation at Provo Airport and Provo River Delta Restoration Project 5. ITEMS FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION None 6. PRESENTATIONS BY STAFF A. Diamond Fork System Update Draft Environmental Assessment B.
    [Show full text]
  • Provo City Corporation V. Donna I
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Supreme Court Briefs 1991 Provo City Corporation v. Donna I. Knudsen : Brief of Respondent Utah Supreme Court Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc1 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. Glen J. Ellis; attorney for appellant. Glen E. Fuller, Marlin K. Jensen; attorneys for respondent. Recommended Citation Brief of Respondent, Provo City Corporation v. Donna I. Knudsen, No. 914637.00 (Utah Supreme Court, 1991). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc1/3904 This Brief of Respondent is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Supreme Court Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH PROVO CITY CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, -vs- Case No. 14637 DONNA I. KNUDSEN, Defendant and Respondent RESPONDENT'S BRIEF Appeal from the Judgment of the Fourth District Court The Honorable J. Robert Bullock GLEN E. FULLER and MARLIN K. JENSEN 15 East 4th South Street Salt Lake City, Utah Attorneys for Respondent
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for FBO/Aviation Service Provider Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC) Salt Lake City, Utah
    Feasibility Study for FBO/Aviation Service Provider **************** Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC) Salt Lake City, Utah Prepared for: Mr. John Buckner, Jr. Director of Administration and Commercial Services Salt Lake City Department of Airports P.O. Box 145550 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Date of Report: December 31, 2013 Airport Business Solutions “Valuation and Consulting Services to the Aviation Industry” 13007 W. Linebaugh Avenue, #102 Suite B, Tampa, Florida 33626-4489 Phone (813) 855-3600 Fax (813) 200-1014 December 31, 2013 Mr. John Buckner, Jr. Director of Administration and Commercial Services Salt Lake City Department of Airports P.O. Box 145550 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 RE: Feasibility Study for FBO/Aviation Service Provider Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC) Salt Lake City, Utah Dear Mr. Buckner: Per the request by the Salt Lake City Department of Airports, we are pleased to present this document, which represents the Feasibility Study for an additional FBO/Aviation Service Provider at the Salt Lake City International Airport in Salt Lake City, Utah. The following report provides our assessment and analysis of various and potential issues related to the addition of another FBO/Aviation Service Provider, including the demand for such services and our recommendations for consideration. In the development of this document, Airport Business Solutions researched many sectors of the local, regional and national airport market, expanding as necessary to gain sufficient and comprehensive data to yield adequate and supportable conclusions. Moreover, we reviewed SLC operational and market data from a number of reliable sources, as well as data from the ABS proprietary industry database.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report
    - Scoping Report - Old Spanish National Historic Trail Comprehensive Management Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement August 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management New Mexico State Office Division of Resources National Park Service National Trails System, Santa Fe Preparers: Sarah Schlanger Bureau of Land Management, New Mexico State Office Sharon Brown Aaron Mahr Otis Halfmoon National Park Service, National Trails System – Santa Fe TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations……………………………………………………………..iii Introduction and Background ....................................................................................………..…...1 Issue Summary . ……………………………………………………………………..20 Draft Planning Criteria...............................................................................................……….…..30 Summary of Future Steps in the Planning Process………………………………………...…….32 TABLES Table 1. Paid Advertisements……………………………………………………………………6 Table 2. Public Scoping Meetings ……………………………………………………………....7 Table 3. Meeting Attendee Representation……………………………………………………...9 Table 4. Tribal Consultation Record …………………………….…………………………….15 MAPS Map 1. Designated trail………………………………………………………………………….3 APPENDICES Appendix 1. Media Releases………………………………………………...…………………34 Appendix 2. Written Comments Summary………………………………………………...…..40 Appendix 3. Verbal Comments Recorded During Public Meetings Summary………………..51 ii LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BLM Bureau of Land Management NPS National Park Service USFS United States Forest Service,
    [Show full text]
  • Enter the David Mccullough Visitscampus\\ ‘Kisstixx’ Hitsit Big\\ Also Inside \\ Pg
    WINTER 2013 UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY ALUMNI MAGAZINE ALUMNI UNIVERSITY VALLEY UTAH ENTER THE ALSO INSIDE \\ DAVID MCCULLOUGH VISITS CAMPUS \\ PG. 8 ‘KISSTIXX’ HITS IT BIG \\ PG. 26 Liberty Mutual is a proud partner of Utah Valley University Alumni Association For additional information about Liberty Mutual and our car and home insurance, please contact us at 1-800-524-9400 or visit us at libertymutual.com/uvu. Smart Decisions for the New Year 1. Join UCCU Receive a FREE COSTCO MEMBERSHIP or RENEWAL* 2. Transfer Your Loans to UCCU Lower your rate | Lower your payment | Get 1% cash back up to $250** Call 801.223.8188 or visit any UCCU Branch today! *Costco Gift of Membership is a $55.00 cash card which can be used for: a 1-year Gold Star Membership to Costco Wholesale, an existing membership Renewal, or an Upgrade. For new members of UCCU to qualify to receive the Costco Gift of Membership $55.00 cash card they must open a checking account and setup direct deposit. For existing members of UCCU to qualify to receive the Costco Gift of Membership $55.00 cash card they can complete any one of the three options: (1) Open a UCCU checking account with a debit card and set up direct deposit. (2) Setup direct deposit AND transfer or obtain a loan with a balance of $1,000 or more. (3) Transfer or obtain a loan with a balance of $5,000 or more. Limited time o er. Cannot be combined with any other Utah Community Credit Union o er.
    [Show full text]
  • Provo-Orem, Utah
    COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS Provo-Orem, Utah U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research As of June 1, 2017 Summary Economy 1,900 homes under construction and The Provo-Orem HMA added jobs at a portion of the estimated 3,200 other approximately triple the national rate vacant units that may reenter the market since the most recent national reces- will satisfy some of the forecast demand. Housing Market Area sion. During the 12 months ending May 2017, nonfarm payrolls averaged Rental Market 241,900, an increase of 10,800, or Rental housing market conditions in 4.7 percent, from a year earlier. The the HMA are currently balanced, with high-technology (hereafter, high-tech) Salt Lake Summit an overall estimated vacancy rate of Elko Wasatch Tooele industry benefits from the highly 4.0 percent, compared with 4.2 percent Nevada Utah Utah Duchesne educated workforce and two univer- in April 2010. Multifamily construction, Juab sities in the HMA, contributing to Carbon primarily of apartments, has nearly job growth. In addition, construction returned to the levels during the 2000s. White Pine White Millard Sanpete Emery payrolls and education and health During the forecast period, demand in The Provo-Orem Housing Market Area services are increasing to support the the HMA is expected for 4,175 new (HMA) is coterminous with the Provo- growing population. During the 3-year market-rate units. The approximately Orem, UT Metropolitan Statistical Area, forecast period, nonfarm payrolls are 1,500 units currently under construc- comprising Juab and Utah Counties in expected to increase by an average of tion will meet some of the forecast north central Utah, along the southern 9,100 jobs, or 3.8 percent, annually.
    [Show full text]