DOCSLIB.ORG

Executive Order

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Executive Order FOREWORD This document establishes the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) for Provo City, Utah. This plan conforms to standards established by the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and provides the basis for a systematic approach to the solution of problems created by the threat or occurrence of any type of emergency situation. The EOP identifies the responsibilities, functions, operational procedures, and working relationship among the various City departments, outside governmental entities, and private support groups. The EOP is divided into seven major sections: Basic Plan, Pandemic Influenza Response Plan, Departmental Annexes, Administrative Annexes, Operational Annexes, Business and Industry Annexes, and Specific Event Annexes. The following is an explanation of these sections: Basic Plan. The Basic Plan is an overview of Provo City’s approach to emergency management. It establishes the foundation for the City’s efforts in mitigation, preparation, response, and recovery in order to cope with an emergency situation. The plan cites the legal authority for emergency management, summarizes the City’s current situation, explains the general concept of operations, and assigns general responsibilities for emergency operations related to emergency situations. Pandemic Influenza Response Plan. This plan describes the roles and responsibilities of City departments in a local response to an influenza pandemic including: disease surveillance, the dispensing of vaccines and antiviral medication, and communications activities. Departmental Annexes. The Departmental Annexes provide specific information concerning the organization and response activities of individual City departments. These Annexes include the emergency operations plans of each department in a format that is similar to the City’s Basic Plan. Administrative Annexes. The Administrative Annexes provide information used in the mitigation, preparation, and recovery phases of emergency management. They include the structure and organization of the City, equipment inventory, risk assessments, training schedule, and governmental contact information. Operational Annexes. The Operational Annexes provide information that may be used during the response phase of emergency management. This information includes procedures, forms, emergency contact information, and maps. Business and Industry Annexes. These Annexes contain information about the emergency plans of businesses and industrial companies located in the City. This information is provided to the City in an effort to improve response efforts in an emergency situation. Specific Event Annexes. These Annexes describe activities that need to be taken by the responsible department during specific emergency events. 1 RECORD OF CHANGES CHANGE # DATE OF DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE CHANGE MADE BY CHANGE 1 06/10/14 Emergency Levels #3 is minimal Chris event, #1 is extraordinary Event 2 9/24/14 Addition of priorities on Section II, Chris A- 3 on page 9 3 9/24/14 Addition of Notification of PIO for Chris Level 2 & 3 Incidents 4 9/25/14 Addition of Council Executive Chris Director responsibilities 5 5-02-16 Change name of Emergency Chris Management Strategic Advisory Committee to Emergency Management Strategic Advisory Committee 6 5/19/17 Changed 4 phases of EM to 5 Chris Blinzinger Mission Areas of Emergency Management 6/26/18 Identified Mass Notification system Chris Blinzinger by name :Everbridge-IPAWS 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE ORDER ................................................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. PROMULGATION STATEMENT ............................................ ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................ 1 RECORD OF CHANGES ........................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. 3 BASIC PLAN ................................................................................................................................................ 5 I. PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................... 2 II. SITUATION AND ASSUMPTIONS ......................................................................................................... 5 A. Situation ...................................................................................................................................... 5 B. Assumptions ................................................................................................................................. 9 III. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................11 A. General .......................................................................................................................................11 B. Emergency Levels .......................................................................................................................12 C. Emergency Operations Center ...................................................................................................16 D. Warning Systems ........................................................................................................................19 E. Phases of Emergency Management .............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. IV. ORGANIZATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES ...........................................................22 A. General .......................................................................................................................................22 B. Organization ...............................................................................................................................23 C. Task Assignments .......................................................................................................................23 V. DIRECTION AND CONTROL ...............................................................................................................34 VI. CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT ...................................................................................................35 A. Succession of Leadership ...........................................................................................................35 B. Preservation of Records .............................................................................................................35 VII. ADMINISTRATION AND LOGISTICS ..............................................................................................35 A. Administration ............................................................................................................................35 B. Logistics .....................................................................................................................................38 VIII. PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE ..................................................................................39 IX. AUTHORITIES AND REFERENCES .................................................................................................39 A. Legal Authority ...........................................................................................................................39 B. References ..................................................................................................................................40 X. GLOSSARY / DEFINITION OF TERMS .................................................................................................40 A. Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................40 B. Definitions ..................................................................................................................................41 PANDEMIC INFLUENZA RESPONSE PLAN .......................................................................................43 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................43 1. PURPOSE ..........................................................................................................................................44 2. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................45 3. SITUATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS ......................................................................................................45 4. ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES ...........................................................................................48 5. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................57 6. TASK ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES. ................................................................................61 7. DIRECTION AND CONTROL ...............................................................................................................65 8. CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT ........................................................................................................66 9. PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE.......................................................................................67
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Provo River Watershed Plan Introduction Public Water Systems
    Provo River Watershed Plan Introduction Public water systems (PWSs) in the State of Utah who treat surface water or groundwater under the direct influence of surface water are required by the Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) Rule, to develop, submit and implement a DWSP Plan for all sources of public drinking water. All PWSs are required to delineate watershed protection zones, develop a listing of potential contamination sources within the protection zones, and subsequently prepare and implement management plans to provide protection for surface water sources within the watershed protection zones. The following PWSs along the Wasatch Front have formed the Watershed Protection Coalition (Coalition) and have initiated a cooperative project to develop their DWSP Plans for the Provo River Basin Watershed: Central Utah Water Conservancy District Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy The mission of the Watershed Protection Coalition is to: Work cooperatively to understand the watershed, identify priorities, and develop and implement long-term strategies to protect the drinking water source(s) from contamination, as a primary safeguard to protect the public health. Support federal, state and local agencies that are empowered with the authority and jurisdiction necessary to protect the watershed(s) and drinking water source(s) through regulations, rules and ordinances. The members of the Coalition, all of whom are active signing and funding members of the Provo River Watershed Council (PRWC), are working together to protect regional surface water resources. By working together in cooperation with other agencies and programs, the Coalition is able to maximize efficiency, and jointly manage potential contamination sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake
    Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake File name: Ecological Role of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake Focus on the Keystone Taxon Chironomidae and HABs Version 1.2 Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake With a Focus on the Role of the Keystone Taxon Chironomidae on HABs Progress Report January 28, 2017 By: David C. Richards, Ph. D. OreoHelix Consulting Phone: 406.580.7816 Email: [email protected] and Theron Miller, Ph.D. Jordan River Farmington Bay Water Quality Council OreoHelix Consulting 1 Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake Introduction Benthic macroinvertebrates are a critical component of the ecology and ecosystem functioning of Utah Lake. They are a major link between sediment chemistry, water column chemistry, nutrient cycling, benthic algae, phytoplankton, and Utah Lake’s food web including carp, game fish, June suckers, waterfowl, shorebirds, etc. Benthic invertebrates provide underappreciated but invaluable ecosystem services and are keystone taxa instrumental for the functioning of Utah Lake’ ecosystem. It has become clear that several dominant benthic taxa, primarily chironomids, play a key role in the timing and intensity of harmful algal blooms (HABs) in the lake. Very few studies have been conducted on the benthic invertebrate assemblages in Utah Lake (Barnes and Toole 1981, Spencer and Denton 2003, Shiozawa and Barnes 1977) and none were conducted at the level and intensity that is presently being accomplished by this group. No study has ever examined the role of benthic invertebrates on HABs in Utah Lake, this is the first. Our research is also an important element of sediment chemistry, nutrients, and food web models that are presently being conducted by us and others on Utah Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Provo River Delta Groundbreaking June 11, 2020
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATE: June 11, 2020 MEDIA CONTACT: Cindy Gubler at 801-971-5639 or [email protected] A decade in the making: Officials break ground on nearly 260-acre Provo River Delta project to help recover the endangered June sucker PROVO — After more than a decade of planning and coordination, Chris Keleher, Director of Species Recovery at the Utah Department of Natural Resources, climbed aboard an excavator to perform a literal groundbreaking, while other project partners joined him to usher in the construction of the nearly 260-acre Provo River Delta project. The project will restore the interface between the Lower Provo River and Utah Lake as another step in the effort to recover the endangered June sucker. The project, which is located a half mile north of Utah Lake State Park, will take about five years to complete. Crews will start by excavating a system of braided waterways and wetlands into which the last mile and a half of the Lower Provo River will be diverted. This constructed system will provide the environs for Utah Lake and Provo River flows to meet and mingle. In 2022, the northern half of Skipper Bay dike, which was initially constructed in the 1940s to disconnect land east of it from Utah Lake, will be lowered and most of the Lower Provo River’s flow will be diverted north of its current location into a new channel. The Provo River and Utah Lake will once again be interconnected through a delta, providing essential habitat for the survival of the June sucker.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Annual Financial Report
    2019 POPULAR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT City of Provo, Utah FISCAL YEAR ENDED June 30, 2019 PROVO CITY, UTAH TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION To the Citizens of Provo City ......................................................................................................................... 1 Provo at a Glance .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Elected Officials ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Key City Services .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Significant Events …. .................................................................................................................................... 6 Top Rankings ................................................................................................................................................ 7 FINANCIAL INFORMATION Statement of Net Position .............................................................................................................................. 8 Statement of Activities ................................................................................................................................... 9 General Fund Revenues ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2013 School Vendor Totals
    Provo City School District School Vendor Totals FY2012-2013 Vendor Name Sum of Amount 5 BUCK PIZZA $ 303.50 7 PEAKS $ 404.25 801 PROMOS $ 140.52 A+ BOOK FAIR $ 4,789.46 AATF $ 217.95 AATG $ 378.00 ABBOTT, DENISE $ 679.31 ABC-TEES INC $ 227.40 ABOUTFACE PROPERTIES $ 100.00 ABRAHAM TRISTAN $ 24.90 ABRAMS, JOHN $ 40.00 ACADEMIC INNOVATIONS, LLC $ 96.25 ACADEMY SPORTS $ 4,812.79 ACE RENTAL-OREM $ 48.95 ACHECAR, GEIDY $ 30.00 ACKROYD, DERRICK $ 4.00 ACOSTA, AIMEE $ 35.23 ACOSTA, SANDY $ 9.75 ACT $ 4,155.00 ADA BADMINTON & TENNIS $ 777.62 ADAIR, EMILY $ 16.00 ADAIR, JENNY $ 770.00 ADAMS, CECILIA $ 20.00 ADAMS, GABRIEL $ 16.00 ADAMS, LORRAINE $ 642.56 ADAMS, PATTY $ 80.00 ADAMS, TALIA $ 10.00 ADAMSON, KAYLA $ 13.25 ADSIT, JULIUS $ 6.00 ADVANCE EDUCATION, INC $ 1,494.43 AED PROFESSIONALS $ 297.50 AGGIE BASKETBALL CAMPS $ 2,000.00 AGILE SPORTS TECHNOLOGIES $ 2,800.00 AGUAYO, ALEX $ 16.00 AGUAYO, DANIELA $ 60.00 AGUAYO, EMILIA $ 15.00 AGUILAR, ABNER $ 6.50 AGUILERA, MAURICIO $ 54.00 AHN, SEONG JIN $ 20.00 AIRE-MASTER OF SO UTAH $ 525.00 ALAN ANDERSON $ 818.75 ALBACH, KURT $ 30.00 ALBERTSON, TANNER $ 4.00 ALDER, HAYLEY $ 92.00 ALEMAN MALDONADO, DANIEL $ 6.00 ALEXANDER'S PRINT ADVANTAGE $ 117.10 ALFARO, NICOLE $ 55.00 ALFRED PUBLISHING $ 20.00 ALGER, DEANNA $ 42.07 ALICIA HICKMAN $ 91.38 ALL EVENTS $ 450.00 ALL FOR KIDZ $ 2,605.96 ALL RESORT GROUP/LEWIS STAGES $ 5,030.00 ALL SPORTS UNIFORMS. NET $ 1,089.49 ALLAN, ASHLYN $ 249.67 ALLEN, GRACE $ 160.00 ALLEN, MIKE $ 113.20 ALLEN, NATHAN $ 38.64 ALLEN, SAMUEL $ 38.00 ALLENS $ 756.88 ALLEN'S CAMERA $
    [Show full text]
  • Provo City, Utah
    Popular Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2018 2018 PAFR PROVO CITY, UTAH Table of Contents To the Citizens of Provo City ............................................................................................................ 1 Provo at a Glance ............................................................................................................................. 2 Meet the Elected Officials ................................................................................................................. 3 Key Services of Provo City................................................................................................................ 4 Significant Events of Provo City ........................................................................................................ 5 Statement of Net Position ................................................................................................................. 6 Statement of Activities ....................................................................................................................... 7 Where General Fund Money Comes From ....................................................................................... 8 Where General Fund Money Goes ................................................................................................... 9 General Fund, Fund Balance .......................................................................................................... 10 Library Fund ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Our Pitch Deck
    W E L C O M E T O U T A H U T A H Utah's iconic national parks, world- renowned skiing, strong growth patterns, economic opportunities and quality of education are just a few of the reasons many are making the move to the Beehive State. As one of the nation's fastest growing areas, Salt Lake City and surrounding communities continue to grow and diversify, making it a great place for singles, professionals, families and retirees to call home. ECONOMICOUTLOOK For the past 12 years, an index of economic competitiveness titled “Rich States, Poor States,” published by the American Legislative Exchange Council has ranked Utah the top performer every year. ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS INDEX Wages are rising briskly, job growth has ranked second in the nation for the last 10 years and the state’s population growth ranks in the top three. Because Utah's economy is the fastest growing in the nation - upward mobility, better pay and more opportunity is available. ECONOMICDASHBOARD Utah's location, cost of doing business, leadership, and an educated workforce, all play a part in why Utah is one of the best states in the USA for business. J o b P o p u l a t i o n G r o w t h G r o w t h 3 . 6 % 1 6 % National 1.5% National 6.3% C o s t o f % B u d g e t S p e n t L i v i n g I n d e x o n E d u c a t i o n 1 0 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Date Ideas Grillp
    DATING & RELATIONSHIPS MEET THE CUTE GIRL P. 9 BFF GOT A BF? P. 29 Summer CHILL & DATE IDEAS GRILLP. 39 Mobile 8:01 PM 100% jobmatch Boostability, 6 487 3 Swipe right on Find out if Boostability is the right career match for you. It’s a Match! It’s a Match! It’s a Match! Lisse and Boostability have liked each other. Judy and Boostability have liked each other. Drew and Boostability have liked each other. Shared Interests (3) Shared Interests (3) Shared Interests (3) Flexible SEO & Great Growth Health, Vision, Work/Life BYU & Relaxed Work In-depth Schedule Ping Pong Co-workers Opportunity Dental, 401k Balance Foosball Environment Training "I was just looking for a job to pay the "When I started working here almost a "Boostability is awesome! I just came back bills when I rst applied at Boostability. I year ago, I was so impressed with the from bowling with our account management was immediately trained and was amazed culture. Part of my job description team and some of the executives. at how well I was treated, how easy-going included making sure I ordered a treat Recently, I attended an SLC/SEM everyone was, and how organized each month for all the employees. Are conference paid for by the company. everything was. I have progressed a lot, you kidding me? That's so great! I love Boostability fosters an environment of I really enjoy my job and look forward to working for a company that truly values growth, hard work and fun." coming to work each morning!" its employees." Drew, Lindon Ofce Lisse, Lehi Ofce Judy, Lehi Ofce boostability.com/ItsaMatch Couple your life-saving experience with a friend.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority
    GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority: Wasatch County Instructions: In the cells below, please provide an answer/description for each question. PLEASE CHANGE THE COLOR OF SUBSTANTIVE NEW LANGUAGE INCLUDED IN YOUR PLAN THIS YEAR! 1) Access & Eligibility for Mental Health and/or Substance Abuse Clients Who is eligible to receive mental health services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Wasatch County Family Clinic-Wasatch Behavioral Health Special Service District (WCFC-WMH) is a comprehensive community mental health center providing mental health and substance use disorder services to the residents of Wasatch County. WCFC-WBH provides a mental health and Substance Use screening to any Wasatch County resident requesting services. Based on available resources, (funding or otherwise), prospective clients will be referred to or linked with available resources. Medicaid eligible clients will be provided access to the full array of services available. Individuals who carry commercial insurance will be seen as their benefits allow. Clients with no funding may be seen on a sliding fee scale. Who is eligible to receive substance abuse services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Identify how you manage wait lists. How do you ensure priority populations get served? WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services to residents of Wasatch County. Medicaid and commercial insurances are also accepted and services are provided as benefits allow. WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services as funding allows those without insurance or ability to pay. A sliding fee scale is available for these clients. Clients accepted into the drug court also have all services available and fees are also set based on the sliding scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Profile of Provo City: 2000 - 2010 3% Change
    Provo City Parks and Recreation Master Plan December 2013 1 Acknowledgements The Provo City Parks and Recreation Master Plan was developed by Provo City’s Parks and Recreation Department with the technical expertise and design skills of PROS Consulting, LLC, and ETC/Leisure Vision Institute. Special thanks go to many residents, park users, and community leaders for their insight and support throughout this study. PROVO MAYOR AND MUNICIPAL COUNCIL PROVO PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD Mayor John Curtis Bill Bridges, Chair Gary Winterton, Chair Ross Salmon, Vice Chair Kay Van Buren, Vice Chair Michael Bateman Sterling Beck William Fillmore Laura Cabanilla Odell Miner Gary Garrett Marian Monnahan Rick Healey Dave Olpin Hal Miller Robin Roberts Tammy Runia Brian Smith PROVO CITY STAFF Wayne Parker, Chief Administrative Officer Shelliane White, Recreation Supervisor Roger Thomas, Director of Parks and Recreation Tucker Lougee, Recreation Supervisor Doug Robins, Parks Division Director Brian Smith, Community Programs/Events Supervisor Scott Henderson, Recreation Division Director Dean Hutchison, Parks Projects Coordinator Paul Duerden, Covey Center for the Arts Manager James Cornaby, Cemetery Sexton Matthew Brimhall, Parks Area Maintenance Supervisor Ron Adams, Parks Area Maintenance Supervisor Cathy Smits, Aquatics Supervisor Bill Peperone, Assistant Director of Community Development Penn Almoney, Recreation Supervisor RESIDENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS Steve Densley, Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce Joe Gledhill, Provo City School District Melanie McCoard
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's Business Journal
    UTAH’S BUSINESS JOURNAL www.slenterprise.com Feb. 6-12, 2012 Volume 41, Number 28 $1.50 $34 million SLC THIS Business property tax industrial supplier relief legislation WEEK sold to New York firm stalls in committee MSC Industrial Direct Co., a By Brice Wallace Rep. Patrick Painter, R-Nephi. Melville, N.Y.-based distributor of The Enterprise Painter acknowledged that, metalworking and maintenance, A bill designed to help busi- from a practical standpoint, the Firm launches repair and operations (MRO) ness owners with personal prop- bill would not eliminate audits but school for supplies to industrial contractors serves its customers from loca- erty tax costs stalled in a Utah it might lessen the likelihood. throughout the U.S., has acquired tions in Salt Lake City, Phoenix legislative committee. “If there’s anything that I’d freight brokers the assets and certain liabilities and Tijuana, Mexico. HB41 received much dis- like to give to the small-business See page 3. of ATS Industrial Supply, a Salt “We are pleased to acquire cussion but no vote during a meet- owners in this state for hanging Lake City-based firm that had ATS Industrial Supply Inc., a ing of the House Revenue and in the last three or four years of sales of approximately $34.5 mil- regional leader with excellent Taxation Committee as people this recession, [it] is a break on lion in 2011. management and an emphasis questioned whether the measure some of their equipment personal Terms of the deal, which on value-added services that fits would result in too much of a tax property [tax],” Painter said.
    [Show full text]
  • Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M
    Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center 2 of 142 Report No. UT‐17.XX PROVO-OREM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (TRIP) Prepared for: Utah Department of Transportation Research Division Submitted by: University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center Authored by: Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing Final Report June 2017 ______________________________________________________________________________ Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report 3 of 142 DISCLAIMER The authors alone are responsible for the preparation and accuracy of the information, data, analysis, discussions, recommendations, and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, endorsements, or policies of the Utah Department of Transportation or the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Utah Department of Transportation makes no representation or warranty of any kind, and assumes no liability therefore. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for funding this research through the Utah Transportation Research Advisory Council (UTRAC). We also acknowledge the following individuals from UDOT for helping manage this research: Jeff Harris Eric Rasband Brent Schvanaveldt Jordan Backman Gracious thanks to our paid peer reviewers in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University: Dr. Grant G. Schultz, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE. Dr. Mitsuru Saito, Ph.D, P.E., F. ASCE, F. ITE While not authors, the efforts of the following people helped make this report possible. Data Collection Proof Reading/Edits Ethan Clark Ray Debbie Weaver Thomas Cushing Clint Simkins Jack Egan Debolina Banerjee Katherine A.
    [Show full text]