DOCSLIB.ORG

JTI Full Response to the EU Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JTI Full Response to the EU Consultation DG SANCO’s Consultation on the possible revision of the Tobacco Products Directive 2001/37/EC (TPD) JTI’s Full Response 16 December 2010 JTI is a member of the Japan Tobacco Group of Companies (JT), a leading international tobacco product manufacturer. It markets world-renowned brands such as Winston, Mild Seven and Camel. Other international brands include Benson & Hedges, Silk Cut, Sobranie of London, Glamour and LD. With headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, and net sales of USD 9.6 billion in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, JTI has more than 25,000 employees and operations in 120 countries. For more information, visit www.jti.com. JTI is a registered interest representative, number 31290853542-43, within the meaning of EU’s European Transparency Initiative. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A BETTER APPROACH TO TOBACCO REGULATION Tobacco products carry risks to health. Appropriate and proportionate regulation of the tobacco sector is thus both necessary and right. Among JTI’s core beliefs are that: x Minors should not smoke, and should not be able to obtain tobacco products. It is central to our Code of Conduct, marketing practices, operational policies and the way JTI does business. x Adult smokers should be appropriately informed about the health risks of smoking before they make the decision to smoke. For these reasons, JTI supports legislative and regulatory measures on tobacco control which meet the principles of Better Regulation (which are explained more fully below). The Consultation does not clearly articulate DG SANCO’s objectives for reform of the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). However, the apparent key policy rationale for various of DG SANCO’s proposals is aligned with JTI’s core beliefs, as articulated above. It is therefore in everyone’s interest that any measures which may ultimately be adopted with the aim of preventing minors from smoking and/or reiterating and emphasising the health risks of smoking, are effective. DG SANCO’s policy and proposals will not, however, be effective if they are not based on, and consistent with, a credible and scientifically rigorous understanding of smoking behaviour. Knowing how and why minors decide to experiment with tobacco products and how they obtain tobacco products are prerequisites for the design of regulatory interventions that will be effective in changing their behaviour. Understanding how adult consumers weigh up the risks and benefits of smoking is critical to designing effective methods to communicate with them about those risks in a way that is likely to cause them to change their behaviour. Leading experts (notably Professors Steinberg, Dhar and Nowlis) prepared reports for JTI which give their independent opinions on the basis of contemporary scientific thinking, on how the smoking behaviour of adults and minors should best be understood. These experts present DG SANCO with a coherent analysis of smoking behaviour, against which the need for further regulatory interventions can be assessed and their likely success judged. JTI considers that this framework reflects the best contemporary science. It also dictates a new approach to tobacco regulation by DG SANCO. It flows from these experts’ findings that: x measures to reduce smoking among minors will only be effective if they control minors’ ability to obtain tobacco products and remove cigarettes from the social networks of teenagers. Access-based solutions take due account of the fact that minors are naturally more prone to risk-taking behaviour than adults. As Professor Steinberg explains, decision-making during adolescence is characterised by a heightened emphasis on rewards over risks; a tendency to focus on the immediate, rather than longer term, consequences of a decision; a susceptibility to peer influence; and weak self-regulation. Minors are well aware of the risks of smoking, but may choose to experiment anyway. These factors, together, explain JTI’s Full Response to DG SANCO’s Consultation, 16 December 2010. Page 2 why a psychological profile characterized by sensation-seeking, peer and family influence (i.e. peers and family members who smoke) and the availability of cigarettes are the main risk factors for smoking. Accordingly, the provision of further information about the health risks of smoking or measures focussed on packaging are unlikely to be effective; and x for measures directed at adult smoking behaviour to be effective, they would need to target adults’ decision-making at the point of consumption, taking due account of the analysis that adults employ when making decisions about risk. They would also need to be more individualised and to be positively framed, in the light of the triggers to smoking behaviour. Professors Dhar and Nowlis therefore dismiss the likely effectiveness of interventions that reflect the so-called “traditional model” of consumer decision- making, which is based on the notion that rational consumers will shift their smoking behaviour in accordance with the evaluation of information on the health risks of smoking. DG SANCO’S ANALYSIS PRODUCES INAPPROPRIATE PROPOSALS DG SANCO’s proposals are based on fundamentally misconceived and outdated notions of smoking behaviours, namely that tobacco packaging and its display are predictors of smoking initiation and that the provision of yet more information about the health risks of smoking will change smoking behaviour. These notions are wrong, and are not supported by the science. Specifically, even if there is a legal basis for EU action, many of the proposals identified in the Consultation – including plain packaging for tobacco products, hiding tobacco products from view at retail outlets, mandating larger pictorial health warnings and banning all types of smokeless tobacco products – are based on misconceived and out- dated notions of smoking behaviour. They fail to take into account how minors and adult consumers think and act, and would not therefore be effective at changing behaviour if they were introduced. Against this background, it is unsurprising that the proposals in the Consultation are inappropriate and ineffective. There is simply no reliable evidence to support the key proposals in the Consultation. DG SANCO has the burden to provide clear and reliable evidence to justify the initiatives; it is unable to do so. Indeed, leading experts have looked carefully at the evidence advanced in support of DG SANCO’s proposals, notably by RAND Europe, and they agree that there is no reliable evidence that those proposals would actually work. Many of DG SANCO’s proposals would involve the unparalleled deprivation of intellectual property rights and brands, which are – as for any producer of consumer products – JTI’s most valuable assets. Various proposals unjustifiably infringe fundamental legal rights to property, expression and trade, which JTI considers are critical to protect. Indeed, certain proposals will potentially place the EU and its Member States in breach of their WTO, TRIPS and bilateral investment treaty obligations. It is wrong for any regulator in a free market economy to go this far, particularly in circumstances where the evidence to support the effectiveness of the proposals is so weak. JTI’s Full Response to DG SANCO’s Consultation, 16 December 2010. Page 3 The negative effects of the proposals would be widespread, and show no signs of having been properly considered to date by DG SANCO. In particular: x Contraband and counterfeit tobacco products would become easier to make, distribute and sell if proposals such as plain packaging and ingredients bans were introduced. These and other proposals would not stop adults or minors from buying or otherwise obtaining tobacco products: they would simply encourage access from the cheaper, illegal and unregulated market. This undermines the real progress made by OLAF, national enforcement bodies, JTI and other stakeholders to tackle the trade in illicit products and to take action when criminal gangs are caught. x The proposals would cause serious and unnecessary damage to competition. Evidence shows that competition would be reduced and barriers to new market entrants increased by measures such as plain packaging and display bans. They remove the last means by which adult smokers are able to make informed choices about which brand to buy. Consumer choice and product switching will be reduced and confusion created. x Proposals would adversely impact Small and Medium sized Enterprises, retailers and tobacco growers. The negative effects of the proposals in the Consultation will be far wider and deeper than currently envisaged in the RAND Report. For example, there has been no attempt made to date to assess the impact on farmers of Burley and Oriental tobacco if ingredients regulation effectively prohibits the manufacture of classic American blend cigarettes (of which those tobaccos form part). JTI believes that the proposed approach is so misconceived, the evidence is so weak, and the negative impacts of the proposals so serious, that DG SANCO must fundamentally reassess its approach and its proposals, and must consider the alternative solutions put forward in JTI’s response and summarised below. AN OPPORTUNITY FOR BETTER REGULATION Unfortunately, in addition to the flawed approach to smoking behaviour, the procedure followed to date by DG SANCO has obvious and serious flaws, and stakeholders have been denied the opportunity to comment on critical issues. For example: x the Consultation excluded any analysis of the threshold issues of legal basis, subsidiarity and proportionality; x neither the Consultation nor the RAND Report has assessed or presented evidence on fundamental EU policies that would be impacted by the Consultation’s proposals, including the impact of the proposals on illicit trade, the protection of intellectual property rights, competition and competitiveness, and consumer choice. Whilst many of these were identified early on by RAND Europe as key work streams, there has been no out-put and no evidence, analysis or policy has been provided to stakeholders for comment; and x DG SANCO has contracted out large areas of work to a body – RAND Europe – whose work is both incomplete and fundamentally flawed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the United States District Court for the District Of
    Case 1:16-cv-00296-JB-LF Document 132 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 249 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO IN RE: SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY MARKETING & SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION No. MD 16-2695 JB/LF MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed November 18, 2016 (Doc. 71)(“First JN Motion”); (ii) Defendants’ Second Motion for Judicial Notice in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed February 23, 2017 (Doc. 91)(“Second JN Motion”); (iii) Defendants’ Third Motion for Judicial Notice in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed May 30, 2017 (Doc. 109)(“Third JN Motion”); and (iv) the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, filed February 23, 2017 (Doc. 90)(“MTD”). The Court held hearings on June 16, 2017 and July 20, 2017. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court may consider the items presented in the First JN Motion, the Second JN Motion, and the Third JN Motion without converting the MTD into one for summary judgment; (ii) whether the Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Reynolds American, Inc. for claims that were not brought in a North Carolina forum; (iii) whether the Federal Trade Commission’s Decision and Order, In re Santa Fe Nat. Tobacco Co., No. C-3952 (FTC June 12, 2000), filed November 18, 2016 (Doc. 71)(“Consent Order”), requiring Defendant Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Pack Modifications Influence Perceptions of Menthol E-Cigarettes
    Pack Modifications Influence Perceptions of Menthol E-cigarettes Amy M. Cohn, PhD Amanda L. Johnson, MHS Haneen Abudayyeh, MPH Bonnie King, MHS Jess Wilhelm, PhD Objectives: Tobacco package colors and descriptors influence attitudes and intentions to use. This study examined the impact of flavor, color, and descriptors on electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) packages young adults’ perceptions of e-cigarettes. Methods: We recruited 2872 US participants ages 18-24 from Amazon Mechanical Turk (2018-2019) and randomized them to view one of 7 e-cigarette package images that varied by flavor (menthol vs tobacco), color (green or brown vs black and white), and descriptor (present vs absent). Models examined main and interactive effects of flavor, color, and descriptor on perceptions of appeal, harm, and addictiveness, and the moderating effects of product appeal. Results: Menthol e-cigarette packages were rated as more “attention grabbing,” “appetizing,” and “fun to use.” Perceptions of harm and addictiveness did not vary across package conditions. Interactions of menthol pack conditions with appeal emerged. Specifically, participants exposed to the green package with the menthol descriptor reported low e-cigarette harm perceptions across all levels of “attention grabbing” and “discour- ages use,” while those exposed to the green package without the menthol descriptor or the brown package with the tobacco descriptor reported lower harm perceptions as ratings of prod- uct appeal increased. Conclusions: Colors and descriptors on e-cigarette packaging influence product appeal and harm perceptions. Key words: flavored tobacco; menthol; e-cigarettes; young adults; perceived harm; perceived addictiveness; appeal; packaging; marketing; tobacco companies Tob Regul Sci.™ 2021;7(2):87-102 DOI: doi.org/10.18001/TRS.7.2.1 urveillance data show that the prevalence of bacco smoke or vapor, making it easier for new us- current e-cigarette use has increased signifi- ers to initiate tobacco use.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of SHOREVIEW AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Monday March 15, 2021 5:00 PM
    CITY OF SHOREVIEW AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Monday March 15, 2021 5:00 PM MEETING FORMAT - This meeting is taking place virtually due to COVID-19. Members of the public may join the meeting the following ways: PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, or Android device https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84462029374?pwd=cXYxMHpoMGhFRTlIdkQ4SkI2cUljUT09 Password: 303732 Phone Call 1-312-626-6799 Webinar ID: 844 6202 9374 Passcode: 303732 1. GENERAL BUSINESS 1.a Discussion regarding tobacco flavor ban 1.b Review of Updated Vision, Mission, and Core Values for the City of Shoreview 2. OTHER ISSUES 3. ADJOURNMENT 1 Memorandum TO: City Council Workshop FROM: Renee Eisenbeisz , Assistant City Manager DATE: March 15, 2021 SUBJECT: Discussion regarding tobacco flavor ban ITEM 1.a NUMBER: SECTION: GENERAL BUSINESS REQUESTED MOTION INTRODUCTION In 2016, the city council approved an ordinance that limits the sale of flavored tobacco, excluding menthol, mint, and wintergreen, to tobacco shops. Last year, the city received a request to expand its restrictions to include menthol, mint, and wintergreen. The council briefly discussed this at a workshop meeting and asked staff to bring it back this spring for further discussion. DISCUSSION Katie Engman from the Association of Nonsmokers-Minnesota will be at the March 15 workshop meeting to discuss a possible expansion of the city's restrictions to include menthol, mint, and wintergreen. As you can see on the attached map, several cities in the metropolitan area have restricted or banned flavored tobacco products, including menthol. Please find attached the following documents: Fact sheet on menthol tobacco products Letter of support from the human rights commission Summary of ANSR's 2020 survey on youth vaping Summary of Minnesota's 2020 survey on youth tobacco usage Policy brief on menthol Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • "I Always Thought They Were All Pure Tobacco'': American
    “I always thought they were all pure tobacco”: American smokers’ perceptions of “natural” cigarettes and tobacco industry advertising strategies Patricia A. McDaniel* Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Nursing University of California, San Francisco 3333 California Street, Suite 455 San Francisco, CA 94118 USA work: (415) 514-9342 fax: (415) 476-6552 [email protected] Ruth E. Malone Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing University of California, San Francisco, USA *Corresponding author The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, an exclusive licence (or non exclusive for government employees) on a worldwide basis to the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and its Licensees to permit this article (if accepted) to be published in Tobacco Control editions and any other BMJPGL products to exploit all subsidiary rights, as set out in our licence (http://tc.bmj.com/misc/ifora/licence.pdf). keywords: natural cigarettes, additive-free cigarettes, tobacco industry market research, cigarette descriptors Word count: 223 abstract; 6009 text 1 table, 3 figures 1 ABSTRACT Objective: To examine how the U.S. tobacco industry markets cigarettes as “natural” and American smokers’ views of the “naturalness” (or unnaturalness) of cigarettes. Methods: We reviewed internal tobacco industry documents, the Pollay 20th Century Tobacco Ad Collection, and newspaper sources, categorized themes and strategies, and summarized findings. Results: Cigarette advertisements have used the term “natural” since at least 1910, but it was not until the 1950s that “natural” referred to a core element of brand identity, used to describe specific product attributes (filter, menthol, tobacco leaf).
    [Show full text]
  • Menthol Content in U.S. Marketed Cigarettes
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Nicotine Manuscript Author Tob Res. Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 July 01. Published in final edited form as: Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 July ; 18(7): 1575–1580. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv162. Menthol Content in U.S. Marketed Cigarettes Jiu Ai, Ph.D.1, Kenneth M. Taylor, Ph.D.1, Joseph G. Lisko, M.S.2, Hang Tran, M.S.2, Clifford H. Watson, Ph.D.2, and Matthew R. Holman, Ph.D.1 1Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993 2Tobacco Products Laboratory, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA Abstract Introduction—In 2011 menthol cigarettes accounted for 32 percent of the market in the United States, but there are few literature reports that provide measured menthol data for commercial cigarettes. To assess current menthol application levels in the U.S. cigarette market, menthol levels in cigarettes labeled or not labeled to contain menthol was determined for a variety of contemporary domestic cigarette products. Method—We measured the menthol content of 45whole cigarettes using a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method (GC/MS). Results—In 23 cigarette brands labeled as menthol products, the menthol levels of the whole cigarette ranged from 2.9 to 19.6 mg/cigarette, with three products having higher levels of menthol relative to the other menthol products. The menthol levels for 22 cigarette products not labeled to contain menthol ranged from 0.002 to 0.07 mg/cigarette.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Non-Menthol Flavours in Tobacco Products on Perceptions and Use Among Youth, Young Adults and Adults: a Systematic
    Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053196 on 21 November 2016. Downloaded from Review Impact of non-menthol flavours in tobacco products on perceptions and use among youth, young adults and adults: a systematic review Li-Ling Huang,1 Hannah M Baker,2 Clare Meernik,2 Leah M Ranney,1,2 Amanda Richardson,1 Adam O Goldstein1,2 ► Additional material is ABSTRACT Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA) published online only. To view Objective This systematic review examines the impact banned cigarettes containing non-menthol flavour- please visit the journal online fl 2 (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ of non-menthol avours in tobacco products on tobacco ings, a step that other global entities, including the tobaccocontrol- 2016- 053196). use perceptions and behaviours among youth, young European Union (EU), Australia and France, have adults and adults. also taken. Other countries, such as Canada and 1Lineberger Comprehensive Data sources English-language peer-reviewed Brazil, have extended, or are in the process of Cancer Center, University of publications indexed in 4 databases were searched extending, flavour bans to include other tobacco North Carolina, Chapel Hill, fl 3 North Carolina, USA through April 2016. products and even menthol avour. 2Department of Family Medicine, Study selection A search strategy was developed The passage of the FSPTCA was influenced by Tobacco Prevention and related to tobacco products and flavours. Of 1688 data showing that candy-flavoured and fruit- Evaluation Program, School of articles identified, we excluded articles that were not flavoured cigarettes may be marketed to selectively Medicine, University of North 4–6 Carolina, Chapel Hill, North English-language, were not peer-reviewed, were appeal to and attract younger consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudo Propaganda PDV Regina Blessa
    ______________________________________________ Análise de campanha em ponto de venda: MARLBORO MAYBE Regina Blessa Doutoranda em Design da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal e Mestre em Ciências da Comunicação pela USP - São Paulo ______________________________________________ Resumo O presente artigo reúne indícios psicológicos, históricos e de semiótica para analisar as pretensões do uso de discurso publicitário específico na campanha Talvez Marlboro e seus possíveis targets (públicos-alvo). Baseado principalmente em estudo bibliográfico, esta análise mostra os formatos usados na comunicação da indústria tabagista ao longo do tempo, em vários países, seu foco, suas estratégias e manifestações contra seus abusos. Palavras-chave: propaganda de cigarros, ponto de venda, comunicação para jovens. Introdução A propaganda de cigarros na mídia de massa está proibida no Brasil e em vários países do mundo, há mais de quatorze anos. No entanto, muitas brechas foram deixadas para garantir a sobrevivência do mercado tabagista, que habilidosamente sabe empreender ações de marKeting para que novas gerações de consumidores sejam preparadas para a continuidade de seu negócio. Nosso foco neste trabalho não é demonstrar o impressionante número de pessoas que sofrem ou que morrem devido ao fumo, pois este já é considerado há décadas a principal causa de morte evitável que atinge o pouco divulgado número de mais de 10.000 mortes por dia em todo o planeta. Nem tão pouco querer entender a distorção do poder público que ao mesmo tempo recebe bilhões em impostos da indústria e gasta outros tantos bilhões na saúde pública para tentar remediar o mal feito. Queremos apenas apontar para essas brechas que estão sendo usadas habilmente, pois, ao cidadão comum, não parecem graves nem eficientes, pois atingem apenas seu subconsciente (de jovem) ainda não formado em seu discernimento e personalidade.
    [Show full text]
  • Menthol Cigartte Use Among Smokers
    Volume 2, Issue 16 November 2013 According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cigarettes This burden update classified as menthol make up 32 percent of all cigarette sales in the United focuses on menthol States1. Menthol is a substance naturally found in mint plants such as cigarette usage in the United States and peppermint and spearmint. It gives a cooling sensation and is frequently used Illinois, and uses Nielsen to dull the nerves in the airways of the smoker. This allows them to inhale software to identify more and deeply receive a larger amount of nicotine and other cancer causing market trends in Illinois. chemicals from the cigarette. MENTHOL CIGARTTE USE AMONG SMOKERS According to the 2009-2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey (NATS), 32 percent of adult male smokers and 40 percent of adult female smokers reported in the past 30 days they usually smoked menthol cigarettes. About 85 percent of black non-Hispanic adult smokers chose menthol cigarettes over other types of cigarettes, as did 42 percent of Hispanic smokers. Menthol cigarettes are least popular among adult smokers who identify as non- Hispanic white (25%). Menthol cigarette use is most common among young adult smokers between the ages of 18 and 24 (45%), adult smokers between the ages of 25 and 34 (39%) and adult smokers between the ages of 45 and 54 (36.5%). When looking at education, 40 percent of adult smokers with less than a high school diploma chose menthol cigarettes over other types. Figure 1. Menthol Cigarette Use Among Adults Smokers by Demographic, United States, 2009-2010 90 85.2 80 70 60 50 45.4 42.3 39.6 38.9 40.2 40 36.7 36.5 35.3 35.6 Percent 32.1 33.1 28.6 30.5 28.2 30 25.3 26.3 24.3 25.3 20 10 0 Source: National Adult Tobacco Survey (NATS), 2009-2010 Note: Each group, other than Hispanic, is non-Hispanic.
    [Show full text]
  • Menthol in Tobacco Products WHO/NMH/PND/18.1 © World Health Organization 2018
    CASE STUDIES FOR REGULATORY APPROACHES TO TOBACCO PRODUCTS Menthol in tobacco products WHO/NMH/PND/18.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative GENERAL DISCLAIMERS. The designations employed Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO and the presentation of the material in this publication do not licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/ imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). WHO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of represent approximate border lines for which there may not this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses yet be full agreement. any specific organization, products or services. The use of the The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you products does not imply that they are endorsed or recom- must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative mended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • WT/DS406/R Page A-1 ANNEX a EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES of THE
    WT/DS406/R Page A-1 ANNEX A EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES OF THE FIRST WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES Contents Page Annex A-1 Executive summary of the first written submission of Indonesia A-2 Annex A-2 Executive summary of the first written submission of the United States A-11 WT/DS406/R Page A-2 ANNEX A-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE FIRST WRITTEN SUBMISSION OF INDONESIA I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Republic of Indonesia ("Indonesia") challenges Section 101 of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 (the "Act"). In particular, Indonesia challenges the "special rule for cigarettes" in Section 101(b), which banned the production or sale of certain cigarettes it characterized as "flavored" (hereinafter the "Special Rule"). 2. According to the legislative history of the Act, the Special Rule was meant to stop cigarette manufacturers from targeting underage smokers with flavours intended to increase the appeal of smoking. One type of flavoured cigarette escaped the ban – menthol cigarettes. 3. Cigarettes may contain a variety of ingredients and flavours that are added to the tobacco or filter. There is, in short, "no logical difference", according to Professor Michael Siegel of Boston University, "between menthol and the hundreds of other flavor additives put into cigarettes", and that includes clove. 4. Clove cigarettes have been produced in Indonesia for over a century. It is estimated that as many as 6 million Indonesians are employed directly or indirectly in the manufacture of cigarettes and the growing of tobacco. The cigarette industry, including clove, accounts for approximately 1.66 per cent of Indonesia's total gross domestic product ("GDP").
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Impact of Menthol Cigarette Bans On
    Original research Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056259 on 5 April 2021. Downloaded from Evaluating the impact of menthol cigarette bans on cessation and smoking behaviours in Canada: longitudinal findings from the Canadian arm of the 2016–2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys Janet Chung- Hall ,1 Geoffrey T Fong ,1,2,3 Gang Meng,1 K Michael Cummings ,4 Andrew Hyland,5 Richard J O’Connor,5 Anne C K Quah ,1 Lorraine V Craig 1 ► Additional material is ABSTRACT progression to regular smoking among new smokers, 6 7 published online only. To view Objective To evaluate the impact of menthol cigarette especially those who are younger. please visit the journal online bans in seven Canadian provinces between 2016 and Independent scientific reviews conducted by the (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ 2 tobaccocontrol- 2020- 056259). 2018. Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee, Methods Longitudinal data from the Canadian arm the US Food and Drug Administration8 and the 1 Psychology, University of of the 2016 and 2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regu- Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Vaping Survey. 1098 non- menthol and 138 menthol 9 Canada lation have all concluded that the removal of 2School of Public Health and smokers were surveyed pre- menthol and post- menthol menthol from cigarettes would have significant Health Systems, University of cigarette bans. Multivariate logistic regression models public health benefits, and recommended a ban on Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, examined associations between pre- post ban changes menthol cigarettes. Canada in smoking behaviour, including differences between 3Ontario Institute for Cancer Canada was one of the first countries in the world Research, Toronto, Ontario, menthol and non- menthol smokers in quit attempts and to introduce bans on menthol cigarettes.
    [Show full text]
  • ENDS Flavor Preference by Menthol Cigarette Smoking Status Among US Adults, 2018–2019
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article ENDS Flavor Preference by Menthol Cigarette Smoking Status among US Adults, 2018–2019 Brian L. Rostron *, Joanne T. Chang, Cindy M. Chang, Rebecca A. Jackson and Bridget K. Ambrose Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA; [email protected] (J.T.C.); [email protected] (C.M.C.); [email protected] (R.A.J.); [email protected] (B.K.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: E-cigarette flavor preference may differ among smokers using e-cigarettes, but little in- formation is available on preferences by menthol cigarette status. Using nationally representative data for US adults from the 2018–2019 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, we analyzed e-cigarette flavor preference by menthol cigarette status and e-cigarette device type for dual-cigarette and e-cigarette users and e-cigarette users who had recently quit smoking by trying to switch to e-cigarettes (“switchers”). Approximately half (52.2%) of dual users of men- thol cigarettes and e-cigarettes reported using menthol/mint-flavored e-cigarettes as did 41.4% of “switchers” who had smoked menthol cigarettes; exclusive menthol/mint flavor use was 13.1% for dual users and 21.3% for “switchers.” A similar proportion (45.1%) of dual users who smoked nonmenthol cigarettes used tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes, but only 26.7% of “switchers” who had smoked nonmenthol cigarettes used tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes. Approximately 60% of dual users and “switchers” used fruit/other flavors, regardless of menthol cigarette use.
    [Show full text]