DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Sakakawea Oil and Gas Management Plan North Dakota

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Sakakawea Oil and Gas Management Plan North Dakota Garrison Project Riverdale, North Dakota Omaha District Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Defense Garrison Project - Lake Sakakawea Oil and Gas Management Plan North Dakota December 2013 This space left blank intentionally. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Scope and Objectives of this Plan ......................................................................................... 2 3.0 Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3.1 Previous Exploration ............................................................................................................ 2 3.1.1 Oil .................................................................................................................................. 2 3.1.2 Natural Gas .................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.3 Oil and Gas Chronology on the Garrison Project .......................................................... 3 3.1.4 Oil and Gas Pipeline Chronology on the Garrison Project ............................................ 8 3.2 Mineral Ownership ............................................................................................................. 14 4.0 Management Vision and Direction ..................................................................................... 14 4.1 Conformance with Corps Management Plans .................................................................... 14 4.2 Management Vision ........................................................................................................... 21 5.0 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................... 21 5.1 Authorities .......................................................................................................................... 21 5.1.1 Federally-Owned Minerals on the Garrison Project .................................................... 21 5.1.2 State or Privately-Owned Minerals Underlying Garrison Project Managed Surface Acreage ................................................................................................................................. 22 5.1.3 State or Privately-Owned Minerals Accessed From State or Privately-owned Land . 23 5.2 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................. 23 5.3 Implementation ................................................................................................................... 27 6.0 Administrative Process ........................................................................................................ 28 6.1 Legislation Framework ...................................................................................................... 28 6.1.1 Corps Regulations ....................................................................................................... 28 6.1.2 Excepted Mineral Rights ............................................................................................. 28 6.1.3 Navigable Waters ........................................................................................................ 29 6.2 Other Laws Relating to Oil and Gas Activity on Corps-Managed Lands .......................... 29 6.2.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) .............................................................. 29 6.2.2 National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended ............................. 30 6.2.3 Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 ...................................................... 30 6.2.4 Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Migratory Bird Conservation Act ............................. 30 6.2.5 Endangered Species Act .............................................................................................. 30 6.2.6 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act ............................................................................ 30 6.3 Other Federal Regulations and Considerations .................................................................. 31 6.4 State Regulations and Rules ............................................................................................... 31 6.4.1 North Dakota Industrial Commission’s Oil and Gas Division .................................... 31 6.4.2 North Dakota Department of Health ........................................................................... 31 6.4.3 Other State Regulations and Rules .............................................................................. 32 7.0 Description of Oil and Gas Development Activity ............................................................ 32 7.1 Description of Mineral Resources ...................................................................................... 32 7.1.1 Oil Resources............................................................................................................... 32 7.1.2 Natural Gas Resources ................................................................................................ 35 7.1.3 Coalbed Gas................................................................................................................. 36 7.2 Stages of Oil and Gas Development .................................................................................. 36 7.2.1 Exploration .................................................................................................................. 36 7.2.2 Site Selection ............................................................................................................... 39 7.2.3 Drilling ........................................................................................................................ 39 7.2.4 Well Completion ......................................................................................................... 41 7.2.5 Well Stimulation .......................................................................................................... 42 7.2.6 Field Organization ....................................................................................................... 43 7.2.7 Oil and Gas Production ............................................................................................... 43 7.2.8 Recovery Methods ....................................................................................................... 44 7.2.9 Oil and Gas Field Treatment ....................................................................................... 45 7.2.10 Product Transportation .............................................................................................. 45 7.2.11 Site Abandonment and Reclamation of Used Wells and Facilities ........................... 47 8.0 Issues and Impacts ............................................................................................................... 49 8.1 Seismic Surveys ................................................................................................................. 50 8.2 Exploratory Wells, Drilling and Production ...................................................................... 52 8.2.1 Potential Impacts to Soil .............................................................................................. 52 8.2.2 Potential Impacts to Surface Water ............................................................................. 52 8.2.3 Potential Impacts to Groundwater ............................................................................... 53 8.2.4 Potential Impacts to Air Quality .................................................................................. 54 8.2.5 Potential Impacts to Wildlife ....................................................................................... 56 8.2.6 Potential Impacts to Fish ............................................................................................. 57 8.2.7 Potential Impacts on Land Use .................................................................................... 58 8.2.8 Potential Impacts on Dam Safety ................................................................................ 58 8.3 Product Transportation ....................................................................................................... 59 8.3.1 Potential Impacts to Soil .............................................................................................. 59 8.3.2 Potential Impacts to Surface Water ............................................................................. 59 8.3.3 Potential Impacts to Groundwater ............................................................................... 60 8.3.4 Potential Impacts to Air Quality .................................................................................. 60 8.3.5 Potential Impacts to Wildlife ....................................................................................... 60 8.3.6 Potential Impacts Fish ................................................................................................. 60 8.3.7 Potential Impacts to Land Use ..................................................................................... 61 9.0 Future Activity Potential ..................................................................................................... 61 9.1 Potential Future Surface Disturbance ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: a Primer
    U.S. Department of Energy • Office of Fossil Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory April 2009 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer Work Performed Under DE-FG26-04NT15455 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory Prepared by Ground Water Protection Council Oklahoma City, OK 73142 405-516-4972 www.gwpc.org and ALL Consulting Tulsa, OK 74119 918-382-7581 www.all-llc.com April 2009 MODERN SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: A PRIMER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) under Award Number DE‐FG26‐ 04NT15455. Mr. Robert Vagnetti and Ms. Sandra McSurdy, NETL Project Managers, provided oversight and technical guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Bakken – the Biggest Oil Resource in the United States?
    Winter 2011 Oil & Natural Gas Program Newsletter Bakken – The Biggest Oil Resource in the United States? The announcement of the acquisition of large acreage positions in the Bakken play has become a fairly regular event. Leasing activity in the Bakken has exploded over the last five years and bonus payments per acre CONTENTS have jumped. Total lease bonus payments exceeded $100 million in 2009 (Figure 1). Bakken – The Biggest Oil Resource in the United States? ...1 The heightened acquisition activity is driven by the Bakken’s immense potential. In 2008, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) estimated Commentary ...................................2 that the U.S. portion of the Bakken formation contains between 3 and 4.3 Successful Oil Production in billion barrels (a mean of 3.63 billion barrels) of undiscovered, recoverable the Bakken Formation .................6 oil, ranking it among the very largest U.S. oil plays. The Bakken—An Unconventional Petroleum The number of producing wells and Reservoir System ................9 and volume of oil production has Crude Souring in the Bakken ....11 grown with the growth in leasing and drilling (Figure 2). Production Geomechanical Study has reached nearly 8 million barrels of the Bakken .................................13 per month from roughly 4500 Bakken Requires Outlet for producing wells. Increased Production ................. 16 E&P Snapshots ............................ 18 The Bakken Formation Upcoming Meetings and The Bakken petroleum system is Presentations ............................... 20 part of a larger depositional system CONTACTS laid down in the Williston Basin during the Phanerozoic period with Roy Long Figure 1: Lease payments in North Dakota’s portion sediments up to 16,000 feet thick.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Oil Production in the Bakken Formation
    EvolutionEvolution ofof OilOil ProductionProduction inin thethe BakkenBakken FormationFormation JulieJulie A.A. LeFeverLeFever NorthNorth DakotaDakota GeologicalGeological SurveySurvey PlaysPlays ofof thethe BakkenBakken FormationFormation ¾¾ ConventionalConventional BakkenBakken (pre(pre--1987)1987) ¾¾ CycleCycle 11 –– AntelopeAntelope StructureStructure (1950s(1950s –– 60s)60s) ¾¾ CycleCycle 22 –– DepositionalDepositional EdgeEdge (1970s(1970s –– 80s)80s) ¾¾ HorizontalHorizontal DrillingDrilling ofof thethe BakkenBakken ShaleShale (post(post--1987)1987) ¾¾ HorizontalHorizontal DrillingDrilling ofof thethe BakkenBakken MiddleMiddle MemberMember (2001(2001 toto present)present) ConventionalConventional BakkenBakken CycleCycle 11 –– AntelopeAntelope FieldField ¾¾DiscoveryDiscovery WellWell ¾¾ StanolindStanolind -- #1#1 WoodrowWoodrow StarrStarr ¾¾ InitialInitial PotentialPotential (536(536 BO;BO; 0.10.1 BW)BW) ¾¾ AntelopeAntelope FieldField ¾¾ 5252 wells;wells; 12.512.5 millionmillion BO;BO; 1010 BCFBCF GasGas ¾¾ ““SanishSanish SandSand”” ¾¾ CompletionCompletion MethodMethod Conventional Bakken Exploration between Cycles ¾¾ElkhornElkhorn RanchRanch ¾¾ ShellShell OilOil Co.Co. -- #41X#41X--55--11 GovernmentGovernment ¾¾NessonNesson AnticlineAnticline ¾¾ #1#1 B.E.B.E. HoveHove ¾¾ IPIP -- 756756 BOPD,BOPD, 33 BWPDBWPD ¾¾ CompletionCompletion MethodMethod ConventionalConventional BakkenBakken CycleCycle 22 –– DepositionalDepositional LimitLimit ¾¾StratigraphyStratigraphy && StructureStructure ¾¾ ThinThin BakkenBakken ¾¾ MultipleMultiple PaysPays
    [Show full text]
  • L'.3350 Deposmon and DISSOLUTION of the MIDDLE DEVONIAN PRAIRIE FORMATION, Williston BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA and MONTANA By
    l'.3350 DEPOsmON AND DISSOLUTION OF THE MIDDLE DEVONIAN PRAIRIE FORMATION, WilLISTON BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA AND MONTANA by: Chris A. Oglesby T-3350 A thesis submined to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date f:" /2 7 /C''i::-- i ; Signed: Approved: Lee C. Gerhard Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado - 7 Date' .' Samuel S. Adams, Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering II T-3350 ABSTRACf Within the Williston basin, thickness variations of the Prairie Formation are common and are interpreted to originate by two processes, differential accumulation of salt during deposition, and differential removal of salt by dissolution. Unambiguous evidence for each process is rare because the Prairie/Winnipegosis interval is seldom cored within the U.S. portion of the basin. Therefore indirect methods, utilizing well logs, provide the principal method for identifying characteristics of the two processes. The results of this study indicate that the two processes can be distinguished using correlations within the Prairie Formation. Several regionally correlative upward-brining, and probably shoaling-upward sequences occur within the Prairie Formation .. Near the basin center, the lowermost sequence is transitional with the underlying Winnipegosis Formation. This transition is characterized by thinly laminated carbonates that become increasingly interbedded with anhydrites of the basin-centered Ratner Member, the remainder of the sequence progresses up through halite and culminates in the halite-dominated Esterhazy potash beds. Two overlying sequences also brine upwards, however, these sequences lack the basal anhydrite and instead begin with halite and culminate in the Belle Plaine and Mountrail potash Members, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Bakken Production Optimization Program Executive Summary Years
    Bakken Production Optimization Program EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A premier public–private partnership harnessing the best minds in North Dakota and in industry to maximize productivity of the Bakken oil play while simultaneously reducing its environmental footprint. 2 BAKKEN PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM This summary of Bakken Production Optimization Program (BPOP) achievements at the end of calendar year 2015 was produced at the request of the North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC) and the associated Oil and Gas Research Program, which funded a portion of the work performed in this program. This summary is intended for public distribution and is intended to relay the ongoing successes of this premier public–private partnership in advancing North Dakota’s economic and environmental interests directly related to exploration and production of oil from the Bakken and Three Forks Formations. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 4 PROGRAM INTRODUCTION 6 Anticipated Outcomes 8 Partnership and Members 10 OPTIMIZATION OF WELLSITE OPERATIONS 12 Flaring Reduction 14 Water Opportunities Assessment 16 TENORM Waste Disposal 18 Spills Remediation 20 THE HAWKINSON PROJECT 23 Need for the Project 24 Industry Firsts 26 Results 27 Conclusions 28 PROGRAM WORK CONTINUES 2 BAKKEN PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM BAKKEN PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 In June 2013, a consortium comprising the Energy & Environmental BAKKEN Research Center (EERC), Continental Resources, Inc., and several of the largest oil producers in the state was awarded North Dakota Oil PRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary Report on Paleozoic Stratigraphy, Mapping and Hydrocarbon A
    Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary report on Paleozoic stratigraphy, mapping and GP2008-2 hydrocarbon assessment, southwestern Manitoba By M.P.B. Nicolas and D. Barchyn GEOSCIENTIFIC PAPER Geoscientific Paper GP2008-2 Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary report on Paleozoic stratigraphy, mapping and hydrocarbon assessment, southwestern Manitoba by M.P.B. Nicolas and D. Barchyn Winnipeg, 2008, reprinted with minor revisions January, 2009 Science, Technology, Energy and Mines Mineral Resources Division Hon. Jim Rondeau John Fox Minister Assistant Deputy Minister John Clarkson Manitoba Geological Survey Deputy Minister E.C. Syme Director ©Queen’s Printer for Manitoba, 2008, reprinted with minor revisions, January 2009 Every possible effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, but Manitoba Science, Technol- ogy, Energy and Mines does not assume any liability for errors that may occur. Source references are included in the report and users should verify critical information. Any digital data and software accompanying this publication are supplied on the understanding that they are for the sole use of the licensee, and will not be redistributed in any form, in whole or in part, to third parties. Any references to proprietary software in the documentation and/or any use of proprietary data formats in this release do not constitute endorsement by Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines of any manufacturer’s product. When using information from this publication in other publications or presentations, due acknowledgment should be given to the Manitoba Geological Survey. The following reference format is recommended: Nicolas, M.P.B, and Barchyn, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Constraints in the Bakken
    U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Date: August 8, 2014 To: Members of the Public From: Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Secretariat and Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Staff, United States Department of Energy Re: QER Public Stakeholder Meeting: Infrastructure Constraints in the Bakken 1. Introduction On January 9, 2014, President Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum establishing a Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). The Secretary of Energy provides support to the QER Task Force, including coordination of activities related to the preparation of the QER report, policy analysis and modeling, and stakeholder engagement. On Friday, August 8, 2014, at 11:00 AM CDT at the Bismarck State College, National Energy Center of Excellence, Bavendick Stateroom (No. 415), located at 1200 Schafer Street, in Bismarck, North Dakota, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), acting as the Secretariat for the QER Task Force, will hold a public meeting to discuss and receive comments on issues surrounding the infrastructure constraints in further developing shale resources in the Bakken region. There will be an opportunity for public comment via an open microphone session following panel discussions. Written comments can be submitted to [email protected]. The session will also be webcast at www.energy.gov/live. 2. Background Over the past decade, the energy profile of the United States has undergone a dramatic transformation. A major component of this shift has been the ability to unlock fossil fuel resources from diverse shale formations around the country. America’s economy and infrastructure will continue to adapt to the abundance of accessible shale and natural gas resources and the decreased carbon emissions, lower imports, and enhanced industrial competitiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Conodont Biostratigraphy of the Bakken and Lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Timothy P
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects 1986 Conodont biostratigraphy of the Bakken and lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Timothy P. Huber University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Huber, Timothy P., "Conodont biostratigraphy of the Bakken and lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota" (1986). Theses and Dissertations. 145. https://commons.und.edu/theses/145 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE BAKKEN AND LOWER LODGEPOLE FORMATIONS (DEVONIAN AND MISSISSIPPIAN), WILLISTON BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA by Timothy P, Huber Bachelor of Arts, University of Minnesota - Morris, 1983 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota December 1986 This thesis submitted by Timothy P. Huber in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science from the University of North Dakota has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done, and is hereby approved. This thesis meets the standards for appearance and conforms to the style and format requirements of the Graduate School at the University of North Dakota and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Bulk Density Mapping of the Upper and Lower Bakken Member Shales of Southeastern Saskatchewan: a Potential Indicator for Oil Generation and Expulsion
    Preliminary Bulk Density Mapping of the Upper and Lower Bakken Member Shales of Southeastern Saskatchewan: A Potential Indicator for Oil Generation and Expulsion Dan Kohlruss 1 and Kosta Stamatinos 2 Kohlruss, D. and Stamatinos, K. (2014): Preliminary bulk density mapping of the Upper and Lower Bakken Member shales of southeastern Saskatchewan: a potential indicator for oil generation and expulsion; in Summary of Investigations 2014, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Ministry of the Economy, Misc. Rep. 2014-4.1, Paper A-2, 7p. Abstract The use of bulk density coupled with formation resistivity of shale source rocks is a possible method of identifying the level of maturity of the rocks, and their potential for oil generation and oil expulsion. The Late Devonian to Early Mississippian Bakken Formation shales of the Williston Basin are extremely rich source rocks and in some areas of the basin have been responsible for generating and expelling vast amounts of oil. Migration of this oil into suitable stratigraphic traps has resulted in unprecedented economic gain in parts of Saskatchewan, Manitoba, North Dakota and Montana. Studies of the Bakken Formation in central Williston Basin in North Dakota have identified areas where its shales are, without question, thermally mature and have generated and expelled oil. However, Bakken Formation shales in northeastern Williston Basin in Saskatchewan have been examined and reported as being thermally immature, with no evidence of oil generation or expulsion. This paper will illustrate how mapping bulk density and formation resistivity has identified anomalous areas in southeast Saskatchewan where Bakken Formation shale source rocks may indeed be thermally mature and may indeed have expelled oil, contrary to previous studies’ findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic and Petrophysical Analysis of the Three Forks Formation: Charlson Field, Williston Basin - North Dakota Bailey Jo Bubach
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2015 Geologic And Petrophysical Analysis Of The Three Forks Formation: Charlson Field, Williston Basin - North Dakota Bailey Jo Bubach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Bubach, Bailey Jo, "Geologic And Petrophysical Analysis Of The Three Forks Formation: Charlson Field, Williston Basin - North Dakota" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 1748. https://commons.und.edu/theses/1748 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGIC AND PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS OF THE THREE FORKS FORMATION: CHARLSON FIELD, WILLISTON BASIN – NORTH DAKOTA by Bailey Jo Bubach Bachelor of Science, University of North Dakota, 2012 Master of Science, University of North Dakota, 2015 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota August 2015 PERMISSION Title Geologic and Petrophysical Analysis of the Three Forks Formation Charlson Field: Williston Basin - North Dakota Department Harold Hamm School of Geology and Geological Engineering Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the dean of the School of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shale Oil Boom: a U.S
    The Geopolitics of Energy Project THE SHALE OIL BOOM: A U.S. PHENOMENON LEONARDO MAUGERI June 2013 Discussion Paper #2013-05 Geopolitics of Energy Project Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 Fax: (617) 495-8963 Email: [email protected] Website: http://belfercenter.org Copyright 2013 President and Fellows of Harvard College The author of this report invites use of this information for educational purposes, requiring only that the reproduced material clearly cite the full source: Leonardo Maugeri. “The Shale Oil Boom: A U.S. Phenomenon” Discussion Paper 2013-05, Belfer Center for Science and International Af- fairs, Harvard Kennedy School, June 2013. Statements and views expressed in this discussion paper are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. The Geopolitics of Energy Project THE SHALE OIL BOOM: A U.S. PHENOMENON LEONARDO MAUGERI June 2013 iv The Shale Oil Boom: A U.S. Phenomenon ABOUT THE AUTHOR Leonardo Maugeri is the Roy Family Fellow at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Leonardo Maugeri has been a top manager of Eni (the sixth largest multinational oil company), where he held the positions of Senior Executive Vice President of Strategy and Development (2000-2010) and Executive Chairman of Polimeri Europa, Eni’s petrochemical branch (2010- 2011). On August 31th, 2011, he left Eni. Maugeri has published four books on energy, among them the The Age of Oil: the Mythology, History, and Future of the World’s Most Controversial Resource (Praeger, 2006), and Beyond the Age of Oil: The Myths and Realities of Fossil Fuels and Their Alternatives (Praeger, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Production from the Bakken Formation: a Short History by Julie Lefever
    Oil Production from the Bakken Formation: A Short History By Julie LeFever Once again the Bakken Formation is in the news as oil Plays of the Bakken Formation prices rise. Over the years the State of North Dakota has Pre-1987 seen several episodes of drilling to try to recover a portion of the immense amount of oil that this formation has generated. Early exploration for Bakken oil was by conventional Beginning with the initial discovery in 1953, the Bakken has vertical drilling and began with the discovery of Antelope been a significant contributor to the North Dakota economy. Field (Fig. 1B). Oil was recovered in Antelope Field from the Over 44 million barrels of oil have been produced from this Bakken Formation in 1953 when an unsuccessful Madison formation, and there is a large potential to add to that total test (Stanolind Oil – #1 Woodrow Starr (SWSE Sec. 21, with the current oil play. T152N, R94W)) recovered oil on a drill stem test. The well was completed for 536 barrels of oil (BO) and essentially no Although a significant quantity of oil has been produced water. Offsets to this well were disappointing, so further from the Bakken it is only a fraction of what the Bakken is development did not occur until 1956 when Northern Pump capable of producing. Long considered to be a premier source Co. drilled and completed the #1 Ella Many Ribs for 320 rock, science places the oil potential of the Bakken between barrels of oil per day (BOPD). The majority of the wells for 10 and 400 billion barrels of oil (L.C.
    [Show full text]