DOCSLIB.ORG

Päpste: Paschalis I. – Zacharias 36/1 Päpste: Paschalis I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Päpste: Paschalis I. – Zacharias 36/1 Päpste: Paschalis I Päpste: Paschalis I. – Zacharias 36/1 Päpste: Paschalis I. – Zacharias Wenn die Ordnungszahl eines Papstes in Klammern gesetzt ist, bedeutet dies nur, daß ein späterer Papst dieselbe Ordnungszahl noch einmal verwendet hat. Ein Urteil über die Rechtmäßigkeit des Papstes wird dadurch nicht abgegeben. Paschalis (I.), Papst 687. Philipp Jaffé/ Klaus Herbers (Hgg.), Regesta pontificum Romanorum, Bd. 2 (Göttingen 2017) Nr. 3546, 3552–3554 Francesca Coppa in: Frank J. Coppa, Encyclopedia of the Vatican and Papacy (West- point/London 1999) S. 313 Umberto Longo in: →Enciclopedia dei papi 1 S. 631–633 Reinhard Barth, Von Petrus zu Benedikt XVI. Alle Päpste (Köln 2008) S. 74f- Paschalis I., Papst 24.1.817–11.2.824. Von seiner Zeit an ist der →bibliothe- carius Vorsteher der päpstlichen Kanzlei. →JE 2545–2557 und Nachträge in Bd. 2 S. 743 Philipp Jaffé/ Klaus Herbers (Hgg.), Regesta pontificum Romanorum, Bd. 2 (Göttingen 2017) Nr. 5017–5095 Peter Johanek in: Bruno Steimer (Hg.), Lexikon der Päpste und des Papsttums (Freiburg 2001) Sp. 268f. H. Mordek in: Lexikon des Mittelalters 6 Sp. 1752 Federico Marazzi in: Philippe Levillain (Hg.), Dictionnaire Historique de la Papauté (Paris 1994) S. 1253f. Patrick McGuire in: Frank J. Coppa, Encyclopedia of the Vatican and Papacy (Westpoint/ London 1999) S. 313 V. Tiberia in: Niccolò Del Re/ Elmar Bordfeld, Vatikanlexikon (Augsburg 1998) S. 545f. Eric John (Hg.), The Popes. A Concise Biographical History (London 1964) S. 132f, Federico Marazzi in: Dictionnaire encyclopédique du moyen âge (Cambridge/Paris/Rom 1997) 2 S. 1164 →Cocquelines I S. 166 Andrea Piazza in: →Enciclopedia dei papi 1 S. 706–709 Hans Kühner, Lexikon der Päpste von Petrus bis Paul VI. (Zürich o.J.) S. 56 Reinhard Barth, Von Petrus zu Benedikt XVI. Alle Päpste (Köln 2008) S. 90 Franco Maria Ricci, Enciclopedia di Roma dalle origini all'anno Duecento (Mailand 1999) S. 694 Portrait (keine Portraitähnlichkeit angestrebt): Philippe Levillain (Hg.), Dictionnaire Hi- storique de la Papauté (Paris 1994) nach S. 336 Enciclopedia dei papi 1 S. 707 Diese Datei stammt aus dem "Lexikon der Papstdiplomatik" von Thomas Frenz, © Passau 2019. Letzte Änderung: 2.3.2020. Päpste: Paschalis I. – Zacharias 36/2 Paschalis II., Rainer, Papst 13.8.1099 (geweiht 14.8.1099) – 21.1.1118. Er krönte 1111 Heinrich V. zum Kaiser, wobei es zum Zwischenfall während der Zeremonie und zur vorübergehenden Gefangennahme des Papstes durch Hein- rich kam. Das erpreßte Investiturprivileg wurde später als "→Pravileg" (→Hu- mor und Ironie) abgelehnt. Unter ihm kommt die endgültige Form der →Bleibulle in Gebrauch, die auch auf die Form der →Rota einwirkt. Seit sei- nem Pontifikat tragen die →feierlichen Privilegien die Unterschriften von Papst und Kardinälen. Devise: Verbo domini coeli firmati sunt. →PIE POSTULATIO VOLUNTATIS, →REGNUM VESTRUM Itinerar: Von Bis 1099-08-13 1100-05-06 Rome 1100-08-30 Salerni 1100-10 1100-10-15 Melfie 1100-10-19 Troie 1100-11-10 apud Casinum 1100-11-14 1100-11-15 Anagnie 1100-11-19 1101-05-15 Rome 1101-07-27 apud oppidum Melliti 1101-09-07 Canusii 1101-09-23 1101-10-20 Beneventi 1101-10-27 Capue 1101-11-17 1102-01-31 Rome 1102-01-21 Albani 1102-02-14 1102-05-29 Rome 1102-09-23 1102-12-12 Beneventi 1103-03-01 1105-06-24 Rome 1105-09-08 1105-10-05 apud civitatem Castellanam 1105-10-11 Ferentini 1105-10-24 1106-01-06 Rome 1106-01-30 apud oppidum Nymphe 1106-02 Gaete 1106-02 1106-03-31 Beneventi 1106-04-03 Salerni 1106-04-18 apud Ciperanum 1106-04-29 apud Cassinum 1106-05-11 1106-05-24 Rome 1106-06-16 1106-06-20 Albani 1106-07-24 Albe 1106-09-19 Florentie 1106-10-05 Bononie 1106-10-07 1106-10-08 Mutine 1106-10-18 1106-10-27 apud Guardastallum Diese Datei stammt aus dem "Lexikon der Papstdiplomatik" von Thomas Frenz, © Passau 2019. Letzte Änderung: 2.3.2020. Päpste: Paschalis I. – Zacharias 36/3 1106-11-02 Parme 1106-11-15 apud Platenam 1106-12-25 in monasterio Clucniacensi 1107-01-04 Casale 1107-01-29 Lugduni 1107-02-02 Cabilone 1107-02-04 1107-02-08 apud Cluniacum 1107-02-08 apud villam S. Hippolyti 1107-02-10 Albe 1107-02-12 apud Nelnam 1107-02-16 Divione 1107-02-18 in monasterio Besuensi 1107-02-24 Lingonis 1107-03-08 1107-03-09 in monasterio Charitatis 1107-03-16 apud monasterium Dolense 1107-03-24 1107-04-01 Turoni 1107-04-02 apud Maiusmonasterium 1107-04-14 1107-04-19 Carnoti 1107-04-30 in monasterio S. Dionysii 1107-05-03 apud Latiniarum 1107-05 Catalauni 1107-05-13 in villa Sesanne, Meldis 1107-05-21 1107-05-25 Trecis 1107-05-29 Antissiodori 1107-05-30 apud Clamitiacum 1107-05-31 apud Lupertiacum 1107-06-06 1107-06-10 Silviniaci 1107-06-28 apud Celsinianas 1107-07-13 apud Privatam 1107-07-14 apud Anicium 1107-07-20 apud Valentiam 1107-07-25 apud cellam S. Marcelli 1107-07-29 apud villam Lausanne 1107-08-02 apud ecclesiam S. Petri d Alaverde 1107-08-04 apud Aquambellam 1107-09-01 Mutine 1107-09-18 Fesulis 1107-09-24 Florentie 1107-10-03 apud Biblenam 1107-10-23 apud Tiphernum 1107-11-16 1108-05-08 Rome 1108-05-14 Sutrii 1108-05-25 Rome 1108-09-04 Ceperani 1108-09 in monasterio Casinensi 1108-09-25 1108-11-08 Beneventi 1108-11-21 apud Troiam Diese Datei stammt aus dem "Lexikon der Papstdiplomatik" von Thomas Frenz, © Passau 2019. Letzte Änderung: 2.3.2020. Päpste: Paschalis I. – Zacharias 36/4 1108-12-24 Beneventi 1108-12 Capue, in monasterio Casinensi 1109-03-07 1109-06-02 Rome 1109-06-04 Signie 1109-08-22 1109-08-28 in monasterio Sublacensi 1109-09-07 iuxta castellum Tarannum in territorio Sublacensi 1109-09-29 1109-10-17 apud Castellionem 1109-10-31 1110-05-02 Rome 1110-06 prope monasterium Casinense 1110-07-15 Beneventi 1110-09-04 S. Agathe 1110-10-16 1111-02-16 Rome 1111-02/03 apud castellum Trebicum 1111-04-02 non longe ab Urbe in castris Heinrici regis 1111-04-11 in agro iuxta pontem Mammeum 1111-04-12 iuxta pontem Salarium apud octavam milliarium a Roma 1111-04-13 1111-06 Rome 1111-07-05 Terracine 1111-10-26 1112-10-20 Rome 1112-11-10 Tiberie 1112-11-10 Princerni 1112-11 prope monasterium Casinense, Troie 1113-01-02 1113-01-18 Beneventi 1113-04-09 1113-10-27 Rome 1113-11-04 1113-11-07 Anagnie 1113-12-13 1114-04-27 Rome 1114-04-30 Albe 1114-05-25 Rome 1114-05-28 1114-06-21 Tyberie 1114-06-22 1114-07-05 Rome 1114-10-15 1114-10-19 Ceperani 1114-10-21 1114-10-22 Berule 1114-10-28 1114-11-07 Anagnie 1114-11-18 Tibere 1114-11-27 1115-04-22 Rome 1115-05 in monasterio Casinensi 1115-05-24 1115-08-24 Beneventi 1115-08-27 Troie 1115-09-03 1115-09-25 Beneventi 1115-09/10 Vulturnense 1115-10-10 Ferentini 1115-10-18 Anagnie 1115-10-30 1115-10-31 Rome 1115-11-03 1115-11-05 Anagnie 1115-11-13 1116-04-05 Rome 1116-04-11 1116-04-13 Albe 1116-05-13 1116-05-24 Rome Diese Datei stammt aus dem "Lexikon der Papstdiplomatik" von Thomas Frenz, © Passau 2019. Letzte Änderung: 2.3.2020. Päpste: Paschalis I. – Zacharias 36/5 1116-06 apud castrum Sutrium 1116-07-19 Priverni 1116-10-23 1117-01-01 Rome 1117-02/03 in monasterio Casinensi 1117-03-12 Capue 1117-03-16 1117-04-21 Beneventi 1117-05/08 Siponti 1117-08-20 1117-10-05 Anagnie 1117-11-30 Trevane 1117-12-16 1118-01-06 Preneste 1118-01-14 1118-01-21 Rome →JL 5807–6630 und Nachträge in Bd. 2 S. 753f. Hubertus Seibert in: Bruno Steimer (Hg.), Lexikon der Päpste und des Papsttums (Freiburg 2001) Sp. 269–272 U. R. Blumenthal in: Lexikon des Mittelalters 6 Sp. 1752f. Georg Schwaiger in: Philippe Levillain (Hg.), Dictionnaire Historique de la Papauté (Paris 1994) S. 1254–1256 William C. Schrader in: Frank J. Coppa, Encyclopedia of the Vatican and Papacy (Westpoint/London 1999) S. 313f. U. Penteriani in: Niccolò Del Re/ Elmar Bordfeld, Vatikanlexikon (Augsburg 1998) S. 546–548 Eric John (Hg.), The Popes. A Concise Biographical History (London 1964) S. 209f. Robert E. Lerner in: Dictionary of the Middle Ages (New York 1982ff.) Bd. 8 S. 444–446 Thérèse Boespflug in: Dictionnaire encyclopédique du moyen âge (Cambridge/Paris/Rom 1997) 2 S. 1164f. Der Brockhaus. Geschichte (Mannheim 22006) S. 686 →Cocquelines II S. 111f. Glauco Maria Cantarella in: →Enciclopedia dei papi 2 S. 228–236 Hans Kühner, Lexikon der Päpste von Petrus bis Paul VI. (Zürich o.J.) S. 88 Reinhard Barth, Von Petrus zu Benedikt XVI. Alle Päpste (Köln 2008) S. 142f. Franco Maria Ricci, Enciclopedia di Roma dalle origini all'anno Duecento (Mailand 1999) S. 694 Carlo Servatius, Paschalis II. (1099 – 1118) (Stuttgart 1979; Päpste und Papsttum 14) G. M. Cantarella, Pasquale II e il suo tempo (Neapel 1997) Abbildung der Bleibulle: Horst Fuhrmann, Die Päpste (München 1988) S. 18 Abb. 3 Thomas Frenz, I documenti pontifici nel medioevo e nell'età moderna (Città del Vaticano 1989) S. 187 Tav. 23,8 A. de Boüard, Manuel de diplomatique française et pontificale (Paris 1929) Taf. XLI,1 Enciclopedia dei Papi (Rom 2004) II S. 230 Irmgard Fees / Francesco Roberg (Hgg.): Digitale Urkundenbilder aus dem Marburger Lichtbildarchiv älterer Originalurkunden (Leipzig 2006/2015) III Taf.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ad Caeli Reginam
    Ad Caeli Reginam accepted so that with the encyclical Ad Caeli Reginam, of October 11, 1954, Pope Pius XII instituted the feast of the Queenship of Mary.[2] 2 Basic teachings According to Catholic teaching Mary should be called Queen, not only because of her divine motherhood of Je- sus Christ, but also because God has willed her to have an exceptional role in the work of salvation. Mary was cho- sen as Mother of Christ in order that she might become a partner in the redemption of the human race: “As Christ, the new Adam must be called a King not merely because He is Son of God, but also because He is our Redeemer, so, analogously, the Most Blessed Virgin is queen not only because she is Mother of God, but also because, as the new Eve, she was associated with the new Adam.”[3] 3 Context The Church has always taught that Mary is far above all other creatures in dignity, and after her Son possesses pri- macy over all. Germanus of Constantinople says: “Your honor and dignity surpass the whole of creation; your Botticelli, the coronation of the Virgin greatness places you above the angels.” And St. John Damascene goes so far as to say: “Limitless is the dif- Ad Caeli Reginam is an encyclical of Pope Pius XII, ference between God’s servants and His Mother.” [4] given at Rome, from St. Peter’s Basilica, on the feast of Pius XII quotes his predecessors: Pope Pius IX, “With a the Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the eleventh heart that is truly a mother’s,” does she approach the prob- day of October, 1954, in the sixteenth year of his Pon- lem of our salvation, and is solicitous for the whole hu- tificate.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Your Catholic Faith
    Eastern Catholic Re-Evangelization Center The Book of Armaments ܞ Defending Your Catholic Faith by Gary Michuta CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - SALVATION WHAT IS SALVATION AND JUSTIFICATION?.........................................................................................2 A Word of Warning...............................................................................................................2 Defining Terms: ....................................................................................................................2 Grace .....................................................................................................................................3 Faith.......................................................................................................................................3 Works ....................................................................................................................................5 -In Brief-....................................................................................................................................6 UNDERSTANDING JUSTIFICATION ........................................................................................................7 The Preparatory Stage ...........................................................................................................7 Justification Proper................................................................................................................8 After Initial Justification .......................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Immaculate Heart of Mary in the Theology of Reparation
    The Immaculate Heart of Mary in the Theology of Reparation Arthur Burton Calkins I. Introduction One can never speak of the Immaculate Heart of Mary without direct reference to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus because these two persons, one divine and one human, of whom their Two Hearts are symbols, were from all eternity united in the mind of God. Blessed Pope Pius IX declared this solemnly in the Bull Ineffabilis Deus in which he proclaimed the dogma of the Immaculate Conception when he stated that God by one and the same decree, had established the origin of Mary and the Incarnation of Divine Wisdom [ad illius Virginis primordia transferre, quæ uno eodemque decreto cum divinæ Sapientiæ incarnatione fuerant præstituta.]1 Precisely because these two persons are not equal we cannot speak of them in exactly the same way and yet they are not entirely different. Thus, we must speak of them in terms of the principal of analogy or “likeness in difference” and then the analogy between the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. I trust that this necessary preliminary treatment will prove to be of value in the end. II. The Principal of Analogy Analogy, in the classical sense in which this term is used by St. Thomas Aquinas and his followers, denotes “a kind of predication midway between univocation and equivocation.” 2 Here is the Angelic Doctor’s own description of what he meant by analogous predication: It is evident that terms which are used in this way [i.e. analogically] are intermediate between univocal and equivocal terms.
    [Show full text]
  • VENERABLE POPE PIUS XII and the 1954 MARIAN YEAR: a STUDY of HIS WRITINGS WITHIN the CONTEXT of the MARIAN DEVOTION and MARIOLOGY in the 1950S
    INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO In affiliation with the PONTIFICAL FACULTY OF THEOLOGY "MARIANUM" The Very Rev. Canon Matthew Rocco Mauriello VENERABLE POPE PIUS XII AND THE 1954 MARIAN YEAR: A STUDY OF HIS WRITINGS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE MARIAN DEVOTION AND MARIOLOGY IN THE 1950s A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Licentiate of Sacred Theology with Specialization in Mariology Director: The Rev. Thomas A. Thompson, S.M. Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute University ofDayton 300 College Park Dayton OH 45469-1390 2010 To The Blessed Virgin Mary, with filial love and deep gratitude for her maternal protection in my priesthood and studies. MATER MEA, FIDUCIA MEA! My Mother, my Confidence ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My sincerest gratitude to all who have helped me by their prayers and support during this project: To my parents, Anthony and Susan Mauriello and my family for their encouragement and support throughout my studies. To the Rev. Thomas Thompson, S.M. and the Rev. Johann Roten, S.M. of the International Marian Research Institute for their guidance. To the Rev. James Manning and the staff and people of St. Albert the Great Parish in Kettering, Ohio for their hospitality. To all the friends and parishioners who have prayed for me and in particular for perseverance in this project. iii Goal of the Research The year 1954 was very significant in the history of devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary. A Marian Year was proclaimed by Pope Pius XII by means of the 1 encyclical Fulgens Corona , dated September 8, 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See PIUS EPISCOPUS SERVUS SERVORUM DEI AD PERPETUAM REI MEMORIAM CONSTITUTIO APOSTOLICA MUNIFICENTISSIMUS DEUS* FIDEI DOGMA DEFINITUR DEIPARAM VIRGINEM MARIAM CORPORE ET ANIMA FUISSE AD CAELESTEM GLORIAM ASSUMPTAM Munificentissimus Deus, qui omnia potest, cuiusque providentiae consilium sapientia et amore constat, arcano suae mentis proposito populorum singulorumque hominum dolores intersertis temperat gaudiis, ut, diversis rationibus diversisque modis, ipsum diligentibus omnia cooperentur in bonum (cfr. Rom. 8, 28). Iamvero Pontificatus Noster, quemadmodum praesens aetas, tot curis, sollicitudinibus angoribusque premitur ob gravissimas calamitates ac multorum a veritate virtuteque aberrationes; cernere tamen magno Nobis solacio est, dum, catholica fides publice actuoseque manifestatur, pietatem erga Deiparam Virginem vigere ac fervescere cotidie magis, ac fere ubique terrarum melioris sanctiorisque vitae praebere auspicia. Quo fit ut, dum Beatissima Virgo sua materna munia pro Christi sanguine redemptis amantissime explet, filiorum mentes animique ad studiosiorem eius privilegiorum contemplationem impensius excitentur. Deus reapse, qui ex omni aeternitate Mariam Virginem propensissima singularique intuetur voluntate, « ubi venit plenitudo temporis » (Gal. 4, 4), providentiae suae consilium ita ad effectum deduxit, ut quae privilegia, quas praerogativas liberalitate summa eidem concesserat, eadem perfecto quodam concentu refulgerent. Quodsi summam eiusmodi liberalitatem perfectumque gratiarum concentum Ecclesia sempre agnovit
    [Show full text]
  • October-2003.Pdf
    CONCORDIA JOURNAL Volume 29 October 2003 Number 4 CONTENTS EDITORIALS Editor’s Note ........................................................................ 354 A Faculty Statement ............................................................. 356 Theological Potpourri ........................................................... 358 Theological Observers ............................................................ 363 ARTICLES The Beginnings of the Papacy in the Early Church Quentin F. Wesselschmidt ........................................................ 374 Antichrist?: The Lutheran Confessions on the Papacy Charles P. Arand .................................................................. 392 The Papacy in Perspective: Luther’s Reform and Rome Robert Rosin ........................................................................ 407 Vatican II’s Conception of the Papacy: A Lutheran Response Richard H. Warneck ............................................................. 427 Ut Unum Sint and What It Says about the Papacy: Description and Response Samuel H. Nafzger ............................................................... 447 Papacy as a Constitutive Element of Koinonia in Ut Unum Sint? Edward J. Callahan ............................................................... 463 HOMILETICAL HELPS .................................................................. 483 BOOK REVIEWS ............................................................................... 506 BOOKS RECEIVED ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary
    Bellarmine University ScholarWorks@Bellarmine Undergraduate Theses Undergraduate Works 5-8-2021 The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary John Klapheke [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bellarmine.edu/ugrad_theses Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Klapheke, John, "The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary" (2021). Undergraduate Theses. 72. https://scholarworks.bellarmine.edu/ugrad_theses/72 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Works at ScholarWorks@Bellarmine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@Bellarmine. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary by John Klapheke Advisor: Gregory Hillis, Ph.D. Readers: Sr. Angie Shaughnessy, J.D. Rev. Fr. Shayne Duvall Bellarmine University Honors Thesis April 20, 2021 2 + Ad majorem Dei gloriam. Table of Contents: Preface……………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Development of the Doctrine of the Immaculate Conception………………………………….....5 Preparation for the Definition…………………………………………………………………....23 Definition/Papal Bull………………………………………………………………………….....26 The Immaculate Conception Since Ineffabilis Deus………………………………………….….33 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….....38 Concluding Prayer to the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary………………...41 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..42 3 Preface This thesis is dedicated to Jude Margaret Ranney and Isaac Joseph Ranney, two souls gone before ever truly known. We pray that God welcomes these souls into the eternal abode of Heaven and that the parents may be showered with incomprehensible blessing. May the Lord heal the wounds from these precious lives that were gone too soon.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutio. Munificentissimus Deus A
    1950-11-01 - SS Pius XII - Constitutio. Munificentissimus Deus A. A. S., vol. XXXXII (1950), pp. 753 - 773 PIUS EPISCOPUS SERVUS SERVORUM DEI AD PERPETUAM REI MEMORIAM CONSTITUTIO APOSTOLICA MUNIFICENTISSIMUS DEUS FIDEI DOGMA DEFINITUR DEIPARAM VIRGINEM MARIAM CORPORE ET ANIMA FUISSE AD CAELESTEM GLORIAM ASSUMPTAM Munificentissimus Deus, qui omnia potest, cuiusque providentiae consilium sapientia et amore constat, arcano suae mentis proposito populorum singulorumque hominum dolores intersertis temperat gaudiis, ut, diversis rationibus diversisque modis, ipsum diligentibus omnia cooperentur in bonum1. Iamvero Pontificatus Noster, quemadmodum praesens aetas, tot curis, sollicitudinibus angoribusque premitur ob gravissimas calamitates ac multorum a veritate virtuteque aberrationes; cernere tamen magno Nobis solacio est, dum, catholica fides publice actuoseque manifestatur, pietatem erga Deiparam Virginem vigere ac fervescere cotidie magis, ac fere ubique terrarum melioris sanctiorisque vitae praebere auspicia. Quo fit ut, dum Beatissima Virgo sua materna munia pro Christi sanguine redemptis amantissime explet, filiorum mentes animique ad studiosiorem eius privilegiorum contemplationem impensius excitentur. Deus reapse, qui ex omni aeternitate Mariam Virginem propensissima singularique intuetur voluntate, «ubi venit plenitudo temporis»2, providentiae suae consilium ita ad effectum deduxit, ut quae privilegia, quas praerogativas liberalitate summa eidem concesserat, eadem perfecto quodam concentu refulgerent. Quodsi summam eiusmodi liberalitatem
    [Show full text]
  • MARIAN UNIVERSITY Marian Solemnities, Feasts, and Memorials
    N UNIVE IA RS R IT A Y M I N A D N IA IA N A ND POLIS • I ® On Marian University’s seal you will find the Latin words Sedes Sapientiae meaning “Seat of Wisdom”—wisdom from which all truth flows and which reaches its culmination in Christ, the Wisdom of God, seated upon the lap of Mary in the Incarnation of Jesus Christ. Marian Solemnities, Feasts, and Memorials January 1: Solemnity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Mother of God (Holy Day) February 2: Feast of the Presentation of the Lord February 11: Feast of Our Lady of Lourdes March 25: Solemnity of the Annunciation of the Lord May 13: Feast of Our Lady of Fatima May 31: Feast of the Visitation of the Virgin Mary June/July: Memorial of the Immaculate Heart of Mary July 16: Feast of Our Lady of Mount Carmel July 26: Feast of Saint Anne and Saint Joachim (Parents of Mary) August 2: Feast of Our Lady of the Angels of the Portiuncula August 5: Feast of Our Lady of the Snows August 15: Solemnity of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary (Holy Day) August 22: Memorial of the Queenship of Mary September 8: Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary September 12: Feast of the Holy Name of Mary September 15: Memorial of Our Lady of Sorrows October 7: Memorial of Our Lady of the Rosary November 21: Memorial of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary December 8*: Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception (Holy Day) December 12: Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe Solemnity: Celebration of the highest ranking feast day commemorating the most important mysteries of the faith.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSUMPTION of MARY by John M. Samaha, SM the Solemnity of The
    ASSUMPTION OF MARY by John M. Samaha, SM The Solemnity of the Assumption of Mary is a feast that traces its origin to the earliest ages of the Church. Tied to this feast are themes of Mary as Mother of the Church and model for the Church. In her, the Church witnesses the fullness of the effects of the saving death and resurrection of Christ for humanity. The preface for the feast’s Eucharistic Liturgy attests to this. Today the Virgin Mother of God was taken up into heaven to be the beginning and the pattern of the Church in its perfection, and a sign of hope and comfort for your people on their pilgrim way. The themes of the Mass prayers and readings, and those of the Liturgy of the Hours, reflect the basis of the Church’s teaching about Mary and the many titles accorded her in popular Christian devotion. The Feast of Mary’s Assumption honors her “Dormition,” as it is called in the East, her falling asleep in the Lord and being taken body and soul to heaven when her earthly life was completed. Mary’s Assumption is analogous to Jesus’ Ascension. The similarity between the privileges of Christ and those of his Mother is in no way identical. Christ has his prerogatives by his very nature as God Incarnate. Mary receives hers by a free gift from God. “He who is mighty has done great things for me.” We understand that Mary is a creature only, dependent on Christ for everything. She is a woman and a mother, and her grace is adapted to her own nature and to her own special function.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariology of the Saints 1 Mariology of the Saints
    Mariology of the saints 1 Mariology of the saints Throughout history Roman Catholic Mariology has been influenced by a number of saints who have attested to the central role of Mary in God's plan of salvation.[1] While the Marian teachings of some saints may have been virtually unknown during their own life, they have influenced the Church centuries later. An example is Saint Louis de Montfort who was a priest for only 16 years and had but a handful of followers upon his death at the beginning of the 18th century, yet influenced four popes, namely Leo Madonna and Child with saints by Duccio, 14th century XIII, Pius X, Pius XII and John Paul II who chose his personal motto Totus Tuus based on Montfort's influence. The influence of saints on Mariology continued in the 20th century, with Saint Maximillian Kolbe's focus on the Immaculate Conception and his Immaculata prayer. How the saints contributed to Mariology A series of articles on Roman Catholic Mariology General articles • Mariology • Encyclicals • History • Popes • Saints • Societies Mariology of the saints 2 • Veneration of the Blessed Virgin Devotions • Acts of Reparation • Consecration to Mary • First Saturdays • Hearts of Jesus and Mary • Immaculate Heart • Rosary • Scapular • Seven Joys • Seven Sorrows Dogmas and doctrines • Assumption • Co-Redemptrix • Immaculate Conception • Mediatrix • Mother of God • Mother of the Church • Perpetual virginity • Queen of Heaven Expressions of devotion • Art • Churches • Hymns • Music Key Marian apparitions • (approved or worthy of belief)
    [Show full text]
  • 1950 — Constitution Apostolique Munificentissimus Deus Pie XII
    Document generated on 09/28/2021 3:54 p.m. Laval théologique et philosophique 1950 — Constitution apostolique Munificentissimus Deus Pie XII Marie (II) Volume 9, Number 2, 1953 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019887ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1019887ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Laval théologique et philosophique, Université Laval ISSN 0023-9054 (print) 1703-8804 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Pie XII (1953). 1950 — Constitution apostolique Munificentissimus Deus. Laval théologique et philosophique, 9(2), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019887ar Tous droits réservés © Laval théologique et philosophique, Université Laval, This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit 1953 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ S. S. PIE XII CONSTITUTION APOSTOLIQUE1 Ier nov. 1950 « Munificentissimus Deus DÉFINITION DU DOGME DE L’ASSOMPTION I. I ntroduction — Dieu adoucit nos peines — Piété croissante envers la Mère de Dieu II. L e s privilèges de M arie — Le plan divin — Nouvel éclat III. U ne définition souhaitée — Après l’immaculée Conception — Nombreuses demandes — Prières et études IV. L a foi de l ’É glise A) Consultation de l’Épiscopat B) La croyance des fidèles C) Solennités liturgiques D) Les Pères et les Docteurs de l’Êglise E) Théologiens scolastiques et autres F) Base scripluraire V.
    [Show full text]