Meta-Analysis: Factors Affecting Placebo Response Rate in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Alexander Ford, Paul Moayyedi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Meta-Analysis: Factors Affecting Placebo Response Rate in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Alexander Ford, Paul Moayyedi Meta-analysis: Factors Affecting Placebo Response Rate in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Alexander Ford, Paul Moayyedi To cite this version: Alexander Ford, Paul Moayyedi. Meta-analysis: Factors Affecting Placebo Response Rate in Irri- table Bowel Syndrome.. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Wiley, 2010, 32 (2), pp.144. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04328.x. hal-00552561 HAL Id: hal-00552561 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00552561 Submitted on 6 Jan 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic Meta-analysis: Factors Affecting Placebo Response Rate in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. ForJournal: Alimentary Peer Pharmacology Review & Therapeutics Manuscript ID: APT-0225-2010.R1 Manuscript Type: Meta-analysis Date Submitted by the 09-Apr-2010 Author: Complete List of Authors: Ford, Alexander; St James's University Hospital, Department of Academic Medicine Moayyedi, Paul; McMaster University, Gastroenterology Division Functional GI diseases < Disease-based, Irritable bowel syndrome Keywords: < Disease-based, Large intestine < Organ-based, Clinical pharmacology < Topics, Meta-analyses < Topics Page 1 of 53 Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic Ford et al. 1 of 51 1 2 3 TITLE PAGE 4 5 6 7 8 Title: Meta-analysis: Factors Affecting Placebo Response Rate in Irritable Bowel 9 10 11 Syndrome. 12 13 14 15 Short running head: Placebo Response Rate in IBS. 16 17 18 19 20 Authors: AlexanderFor C Ford 1,Peer Paul Moayyedi Review2. 21 22 23 24 1 25 Department of Academic Medicine, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK. 26 27 2Gastroenterology Division, McMaster University, Health Sciences Center, Hamilton, 28 29 Ontario, Canada. 30 31 32 33 34 Abbreviations: 5-HT 5-hydroxytryptamine 35 36 37 b.i.d. twice daily 38 39 CI confidence interval 40 41 GI gastrointestinal 42 43 44 IBS irritable bowel syndrome 45 46 MeSH medical subject headings 47 48 o.d. once daily 49 50 51 q.i.d. four times daily 52 53 RCT randomised controlled trial 54 55 t.i.d. three times daily 56 57 58 59 60 Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic Page 2 of 53 Ford et al. 2 of 51 1 2 3 Correspondence: Dr. Alex Ford 4 5 6 Department of Academic Medicine 7 8 Room 7.22 9 10 11 Clinical Sciences Building 12 13 St. James’s University Hospital 14 15 Beckett Street 16 17 18 Leeds 19 20 ForLS9 7TF Peer Review 21 22 United Kingdom 23 24 25 Email: [email protected] 26 27 Telephone: +44 28 29 Facsimile: +44 30 31 32 33 34 Keywords: Irritable bowel syndrome 35 36 37 Meta-analysis 38 39 Randomised controlled trials 40 41 Placebo 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Word count: 3936 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 3 of 53 Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic Ford et al. 3 of 51 1 2 3 SUMMARY 4 5 6 Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional disorder of the 7 8 gastrointestinal tract. Magnitude of placebo response rate in treatment trials for IBS, 9 10 11 and what factors may influence this, is important. 12 13 Aims: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining this. 14 15 Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane central register of controlled 16 17 18 trials were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 19 20 pharmacological therapiesFor with Peer placebo in adultReview IBS patients. Studies reported either 21 22 global assessment of IBS symptom cure or improvement, or abdominal pain cure or 23 24 25 improvement. Data were extracted as intention-to-treat analyses with drop-outs 26 27 assumed to be treatment failures, and pooled using a random effects model. 28 29 Proportion of placebo patients experiencing symptom improvement or resolution was 30 31 32 reported, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Effect of trial characteristics on 33 34 magnitude of placebo response was examined. 35 36 37 Results: 73 RCTs were eligible, including 8364 patients with IBS allocated to 38 39 placebo. Pooled placebo response rate across all RCTs was 37.5% (95% CI 34.4%- 40 41 40.6%). Rates were higher in European RCTs, RCTs that used physician-reported 42 43 44 outcomes, and RCTs using shorter duration of therapy. 45 46 Conclusions: Placebo response rates across RCTs of pharmacological therapies in 47 48 IBS were high. Future research should identify patient characteristics predicting 49 50 51 placebo response. 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic Page 4 of 53 Ford et al. 4 of 51 1 2 3 INTRODUCTION 4 5 6 7 8 Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal (GI) 9 10 11 disorder consisting of abdominal pain in association with a disturbance in bowel habit. 12 1 2, 3 13 The condition follows a chronic relapsing and remitting course. Sufferers 14 15 represent a significant burden to the health service due to the consumption of medical 16 17 3-6 7 18 resources, such as consultations in primary and secondary care, investigations, 19 20 drugs, 8 and unnecessaryFor surgical Peer procedures. Review 9 21 22 Despite evidence from recent meta-analyses demonstrating that some 23 24 25 pharmaceutical agents, including antispasmodic drugs, peppermint oil, antidepressants, 26 27 and drugs acting on the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor are of benefit for the 28 29 treatment of IBS in the short-term, 10-12 there is no medical intervention proven to alter 30 31 32 the long-term natural history of the condition, and there is no agreement on a gold- 33 34 standard for the treatment of IBS. 35 36 37 As a result, whenever a new pharmaceutical agent is developed for IBS it is 38 39 compared with placebo in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). There is no structural 40 41 abnormality that can be corrected by successful therapy and response to treatment is 42 43 44 therefore assessed by improvement in symptoms. This is a subjective outcome and, in 45 46 an effort to standardise research, the Rome foundation has made recommendations as 47 48 to how best to assess response to therapy in treatment trials conducted in IBS and the 49 50 13 51 other functional GI disorders. 52 53 Evidence from the systematic review literature suggests that a significant 54 55 proportion of patients assigned to placebo will respond to therapy, even in RCTs of 56 57 58 therapies for organic GI conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease or peptic 59 60 ulcer, where mucosal or ulcer healing are the outcomes of interest. 14, 15 In functional Page 5 of 53 Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic Ford et al. 5 of 51 1 2 3 GI disorders, where trial endpoints are likely to be less tangible than this, the placebo 4 5 6 response rate may be even higher. However, despite the fact that there have been 7 8 numerous published RCTs of pharmacological therapies in IBS this issue has not been 9 10 11 well studied. This is important, as high placebo response rates will statistically reduce 12 13 the possibility of seeing a positive impact of active therapy, and RCTs should be 14 15 designed to minimise placebo response. We have therefore conducted a systematic 16 17 18 review and meta-analysis in order to assess the magnitude of the placebo response rate 19 20 in treatment trials Forof IBS, and Peer have examined Review trial characteristics and features of 21 22 design that may influence this. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic Page 6 of 53 Ford et al. 6 of 51 1 2 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 4 5 6 7 8 Search Strategy and Trial Selection 9 10 11 Studies were identified through a search developed to inform an updated 12 13 monograph on the management of IBS for the American College of Gastroenterology. 14 15 16 A search of the medical literature was conducted using MEDLINE (1950 to January 16 17 18 2010), EMBASE (1980 to January 2010), and the Cochrane central register of 19 20 controlled trials (2009).For Randomised Peer controlled Review trials examining the effect of 21 22 pharmacological therapies in adult patients (over the age of 16 years) with IBS were 23 24 25 eligible for inclusion (Box 1). The first period of cross-over RCTs were also eligible 26 27 for inclusion. In the case of all RCTs the control arm were required to receive placebo. 28 29 Duration of therapy had to be at least 7 days. The diagnosis of IBS could be based on 30 31 32 either a physician’s opinion or symptom-based diagnostic criteria, supplemented by 33 34 the results of investigations to exclude organic disease, where trials deemed this 35 36 37 necessary.Trials had to report either a global assessment of IBS symptom cure or 38 39 improvement, or abdominal pain cure or improvement, after completion of therapy, 40 41 preferably as reported by the patient, but if this was not recorded then as documented 42 43 44 by the investigator or via questionnaire data.
Recommended publications
  • Therapeutic Class Overview Irritable Bowel Syndrome Agents
    Therapeutic Class Overview Irritable Bowel Syndrome Agents Therapeutic Class Overview/Summary: This review will focus on agents used for the treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).1-5 IBS is a gastrointestinal syndrome characterized primarily by non-specific chronic abdominal pain, usually described as a cramp-like sensation, and abnormal bowel habits, either constipation or diarrhea, in which there is no organic cause. Other common gastrointestinal symptoms may include gastroesophageal reflux, dysphagia, early satiety, intermittent dyspepsia and nausea. Patients may also experience a wide range of non-gastrointestinal symptoms. Some notable examples include sexual dysfunction, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, increased urinary frequency/urgency and fibromyalgia-like symptoms.6 IBS is defined by one of four subtypes. IBS with constipation (IBS-C) is the presence of hard or lumpy stools with ≥25% of bowel movements and loose or watery stools with <25% of bowel movements. When IBS is associated with diarrhea (IBS-D) loose or watery stools are present with ≥25% of bowel movements and hard or lumpy stools are present with <25% of bowel movements. Mixed IBS (IBS-M) is defined as the presence of hard or lumpy stools with ≥25% and loose or water stools with ≥25% of bowel movements. Final subtype, or unsubtyped, is all other cases of IBS that do not fall into the other classes. Pharmacological therapy for IBS depends on subtype.7 While several over-the-counter or off-label prescription agents are used for the treatment of IBS, there are currently only two agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of IBS-C and three agents approved by the FDA for IBS-D.
    [Show full text]
  • Prophylactic Antiemetic Therapy with Ondansetron, Granisetron and Metoclopramide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under GA
    JK SCIENCE ORIGINAL ARTICLE Prophylactic Antiemetic Therapy with Ondansetron, Granisetron and Metoclopramide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under GA Vishal Gupta, Renu Wakhloo, Anjali Mehta, Satya Dev Gupta Abstract The aim of the present study was to compare the antiemetic effect of intravenous Granisetron, Ondansetron & Metoclopramide in a randomized blinded study for prophylaxis of post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. 60 patients (ASA I & II) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into three equal groups (n=20). Emetic episodes in first 24 hours were recorded and compared in different study groups. Results were analyzed. Minimal emetic episodes were observed in early post-operative period (1-12hrs) in patients who had received intravenous granisetron in comparison to ondansetron and metoclopramide. However, after 12 hours emesis free periods were statistically insignificant between group A and B while patients in group C had no antiemetic effect. Keywords Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), Granisetron, Ondensetron, Metoclopramide Introduction The most common and distressing symptoms, which vascular anastomoses and increased intracranial follow anaesthesia and surgery, are pain and emesis. The pressure(4). The anaesthetic consequences are aspiration syndrome of nausea, retching and vomiting is known as pneumonitis and discomfort in recovery. For institutions 'sickness' and each part of it can be distinguished as a there is increased financial burden because of increased separate entity (1). PONV (post operative nausea and nursing care, delayed discharge from Phase I and II vomiting) has been characterized as big 'little problem(2) recovery units and unexpected admissions. Hence, and has been a common complication for both in patients prophylactic antiemetic therapy is needed for all these and out patients undergoing virtually all types of surgical patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Pgx Report for 1 / 31 Examples of Different Levels of Evidence for Pgx Snps
    Comprehensive PGx report for PERSONAL DETAILS Advanced Diagnostics Laboratory LLC CLIA:31D2149403 Phone: Fax: PATIENT DOB Address: 1030 North Kings Highway Suite 304 Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 GENDER FEMALE Website: http://advanceddiagnosticslaboratory.com/ SPECIMEN TYPE Oral Fluid LABORATORY INFORMATION ORDERING PHYSICIAN ACCESSION NUMBER 100344 FACILITY COLLECTION DATE 08/10/2020 RECEIVED DATE 08/14/2020 REPORT GENERATED 09/08/2020 LABORATORY DIRECTOR Dr. Jeanine Chiaffarano Current Patient Medication Clonidine (Catapres, Kapvay) The personalized pharmacogenomics profile of this patient reveals intermediate CYP2D6-mediated metabolism, extensive CYP1A2-mediated metabolism, and extensive CYP3A5-mediated metabolism. For further details, please find supporting evidence in this report or on websites such as www.pharmgkb.org or www.fda.gov. Losartan (Cozaar) The personalized pharmacogenomics profile of this patient reveals extensive CYP2C9-mediated metabolism, extensive CYP3A4-mediated metabolism, and extensive CYP3A5-mediated metabolism. For further details, please find supporting evidence in this report or on websites such as www.pharmgkb.org or www.fda.gov. Diltiazem (Cardizem, Tiazac) The personalized pharmacogenomics profile of this patient reveals extensive CYP3A4-mediated metabolism, intermediate CYP2C19-mediated metabolism, and extensive CYP3A5- mediated metabolism. For further details, please find supporting evidence in this report or on websites such as www.pharmgkb.org or www.fda.gov. Labetalol (Normodyne, Trandate) The personalized pharmacogenomics profile of this patient reveals intermediate CYP2D6-mediated metabolism, and intermediate CYP2C19-mediated metabolism. For further details, please find supporting evidence in this report or on websites such as www.pharmgkb.org or www.fda.gov. Mycophenolate mofetil (Myfortic, CellCept) The personalized pharmacogenomics profile of this patient reveals extensive CYP3A4-mediated metabolism, extensive CYP3A5-mediated metabolism, and extensive CYP2C8-mediated metabolism.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists in Neurologic and Neuropsychiatric Disorders: the Iceberg Still Lies Beneath the Surface
    1521-0081/71/3/383–412$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.118.015487 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 71:383–412, July 2019 Copyright © 2019 by The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC Attribution 4.0 International license. ASSOCIATE EDITOR: JEFFREY M. WITKIN 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists in Neurologic and Neuropsychiatric Disorders: The Iceberg Still Lies beneath the Surface Gohar Fakhfouri,1 Reza Rahimian,1 Jonas Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, Mohammad Reza Zirak, and Jean-Martin Beaulieu Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, CERVO Brain Research Centre, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada (G.F., R.R.); Sensorion SA, Montpellier, France (J.D.-J.); Department of Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran (M.R.Z.); and Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (J.-M.B.) Abstract. ....................................................................................384 I. Introduction. ..............................................................................384 II. 5-HT3 Receptor Structure, Distribution, and Ligands.........................................384 A. 5-HT3 Receptor Agonists .................................................................385 B. 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists. ............................................................385 Downloaded from 1. 5-HT3 Receptor Competitive Antagonists..............................................385 2. 5-HT3 Receptor
    [Show full text]
  • IBS Treatment
    TREATMENTS OF IBS Douglas A. Drossman, MD Co-Director UNC Center for Functional GI & Motility Disorders INTRODUCTION In recent years, there has been increased interest by physicians and the pharmaceutical industry regarding newer treatments for IBS. Before discussing these new treatments, it is important to consider the overall management strategy in IBS. This is necessary because patients with IBS exhibit a wide spectrum of symptoms of varying frequencies and degrees of severity. There is no one ideal treatment for IBS, and the newer medications may work best for only a subset of patients having this disorder. Therefore, the clinician must first apply certain general management approaches and, following this, treatment choices will depend on the nature (i.e., predominant diarrhea, constipation, or bloating, etc.) and severity (mild, moderate, severe) of the symptoms. The symptoms of IBS may have any of several underlying causes. These can include: (a) abnormal motility (uncoordinated or excessive contractions that can lead to diarrhea, constipation, bloating) (b) visceral hypersensitivity (lower pain threshold of the nerves that can produce abdominal discomfort or pain) resulting from the abnormal motility, stress or infection (c) dysfunction of the brain's ability to regulate these visceral (intestinal) activities. Treatments will vary depending on which of these possibilities are occurring. In general, milder symptoms relate primarily to abnormal motility, often in response to food, activity or stress, and/or visceral hypersensitivity. They are commonly treated symptomatically with pharmacological agents directed at the gut. However, more severe symptoms often relate to dysfunction of the brain-gut regulatory system with associated psychosocial effects, and psychological or behavioral treatments and antidepressants are frequently helpful.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Generic Medications
    List of Generic Medications D0001 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) D0031 Artemisinin D0002 Abacavir D0032 Artesunate D0003 Abiraterone D0033 Asenapine D0004 Acenocoumarol D0034 Aspirin D0005 Aclidinium D0035 Astemizole D0006 Albendazole D0036 Atazanavir D0007 Alfentanyl D0037 Atomoxetine D0008 Alfuzosin D0038 Atorvastatin D0009 Aliskiren D0039 Avanafil D0010 Allopurinol D0040 Axitinib D0011 Almotriptan D0041 Azathioprine D0012 Alogliptin D0042 Azilsartan D0013 Alosetron D0043 Bazedoxifene D0014 Alprazolam D0044 Bedaquiline D0015 Amantadine D0045 Bepridil D0016 Amiodarone D0046 Bicalutamide D0017 Amisulpride D0047 Bisoprolol D0018 Amitriptyline D0048 Boceprevir D0019 Amlodipine D0049 Bosentan D0020 Amobarbital D0050 Bosutinib D0021 Amodiaquine D0051 Brivaracetam D0022 Amoxapine D0052 Bromazepam D0023 Anastrozole D0053 Bromocriptine D0024 Apixaban D0054 Bromperidol D0025 Aprepitant D0055 Brotizolam D0026 Arformoterol D0056 Budesonide D0027 Aripiprazole D0057 Buprenorphine D0028 Armodafinil D0058 Bupropion D0029 Arteether D0059 Buspirone D0030 Artemether D0060 Cabozantinib [email protected] Page 1 List of Generic Medications D0061 Canagliflozin D0091 Clofarabine D0062 Cannabidiol (CBD) D0092 Clofibrate D0063 Cannabinol (CBN) D0093 Clomipramine D0064 Captopril D0094 Clonazepam D0065 Carbamazepine D0095 Clonidine D0066 Carisoprodol D0096 Clopidogrel D0067 Carmustine D0097 Clorazepate D0068 Carvedilol D0098 Clozapine D0069 Celecoxib D0099 Cocaine D0070 Ceritinib D0100 Codeine D0071 Cerivastatin D0101 Colchicine D0072 Cetirizine
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea
    This is a repository copy of Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/156693/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Black, CJ, Houghton, LA and Ford, AC orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4359 (2020) Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 115 (3). pp. 483-484. ISSN 0002-9270 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000518 © The American College of Gastroenterology 2020. All Rights Reserved. This is an author produced version of correspondence published in The American Journal of Gastroenterology. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Black et al Page 1 of 11 TITLE PAGE Title: Relative Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Authors: Christopher J. Black1, 2, Lesley A. Houghton, 2, Alexander C. Ford1, 2. 1Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Stems in the Selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances
    WHO/PSM/QSM/2006.3 The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances 2006 Programme on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Medicines Policy and Standards The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Pharmacology of Novel 5-HT3 Receptor Ligands; with the Potential to Treat Neuropsychiatric and Gastrointestinal Disorders
    Investigating the pharmacology of novel 5-HT3 receptor ligands; with the potential to treat neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal disorders by Alexander Roberts A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Clinical Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham February 2020 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; serotonin) 5-HT3 receptor is an excitatory ligand- gated ion channel expressed in for example the brain and the gastrointestinal tract. Two major subtypes of the receptor have been studied in the most detail; the homomeric 5-HT3A receptor and the heteromeric 5-HT3AB receptor. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are used clinically to treat chemotherapy induced and post-operative nausea and vomiting, and demonstrate symptomatic relief in diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-d); but unfortunately, these medications cause adverse effects such as constipation or rarely ischemic colitis in the latter condition. This study has characterised the pharmacology of two structurally distinct 5-HT3 receptor partial agonists (vortioxetine and CSTI-300); and identified the unique binding properties of the cryptic orthosteric modulator 5-chloroindole (Cl-indole) for the human (h) 5-HT3 receptor.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance Review Proposal PDF 387 KB
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Surveillance programme Surveillance proposal consultation document Irritable bowel syndrome NICE guideline CG61 – 8-year surveillance review Background information Guideline issue date: February 2008 3-year review (no update)* 6-year review (yes to update) *Although the 3-year review decision was no update, the findings were subsequently used to pilot the NICE’s rapid update process. Surveillance proposal for consultation We will not update the guideline at this time. Reason for the proposal New evidence We found 105 new studies in a search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews published between 01 September 2013 and 18 July 2016. We also considered studies identified by members of the guideline committee who originally worked on this guideline. Evidence identified in previous surveillance 3 years and 6 years after publication of the guideline was also considered. This included 52 studies identified by search. From all sources, 157 studies were considered to be relevant to the guideline. Surveillance proposal consultation document for Irritable bowel syndrome (2008) NICE guideline CG61 1 of 44 This included new evidence that is consistent with current recommendations on: diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) dietary interventions physical activity interventions drug treatments (antispasmodics, laxatives, anti-motility agents and antidepressants) psychotherapy hypnotherapy, biofeedback and relaxation therapy acupuncture and patient information. We also identified new evidence in the following areas that was inconsistent with, or not covered by, current recommendations, but the evidence was not considered to impact on the guideline: ondansetron vitamin D supplementation herbal medicines. We did not find any new evidence on reflexology, psychosocial interventions, or self-help and support groups.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015.09 IBS Drug Class Review.Pdf
    Drug Class Review Agents Indicated in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome 56:92 GI Drugs, Miscellaneous Alosetron (Lotronex®) Eluxadoline (Viberzi®) Linaclotide (Linzess®) Lubiprostone (Amitiza®) Tegaserod (Zelnorm®) Final Report September 2015 Review prepared by: Melissa Archer, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacist Irene Pan, PharmD Candidate 2016 Chelsey Hancock, PharmD Candidate 2016 Carin Steinvoort, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacist Gary Oderda, PharmD, MPH, Professor University of Utah College of Pharmacy Copyright © 2015 by University of Utah College of Pharmacy Salt Lake City, Utah. All rights reserved. 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1. Comparison of the Agents Indicated in the Treatment of IBS ................................. 5 Disease Overview ........................................................................................................................ 6 Table 2. Summary of IBS Treatment Options ........................................................................ 8 Table 3. IBS Disease Staging System .................................................................................... 11 Table 4. Most Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of IBS ..................... 13 Pharmacology ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elite Pgx Report
    Comprehensive PGx report for SANDRA HENRY PERSONAL DETAILS Redwood Lab Services LLC CLIA:45D2108203 Fax: PATIENT ENRY DOB 281-378-2116 281-466-2483 Address: 6776 Southwest Fwy Suite 600, Houston, TX 77074 GENDER Female Website: http://www.redwoodlabservices.com/ SPECIMEN TYPE Buccal Swab LABORATORY INFORMATION ORDERING PHYSICIAN - ACCESSION NUMBER 2006271582 FACILITY Elite Clinical Lab COLLECTION DATE 06/03/2020 RECEIVED DATE 07/01/2020 REPORT GENERATED 09/21/2020 LABORATORY DIRECTOR Chad Harper Current Patient Medication This patient is either not receiving any medication or may be receiving medications that are outside the scope of this report. A medication has potentially reduced ecacy, increased toxicity or the patient has a risk for the indicated condition. Guidelines exist for adjusting dosage, increased vigilance or the patient has risk for the indicated condition. The medication can be prescribed according to standard regimens or the patient's risk for the indicated condition is not increased. Comprehensive PGx report for SANDRA HENRY 1 / 29 G E NOTYP E /HAP L OTYP E /P HE NOTYP E DE TAIL Dis claimer: No patient should evaluate or use the information contained herein without the advice, consultation and supervision of a licensed healthcare professional such as a pharmacist or G ene G enotype-Haplotype P henotype physician. Laboratory-developed testing characteristics and protocols. R esults have not been reviewed or approved by the U.S . Food & Drug Administration (FDA). * This call was defaulted to the wild-type allele frequency because during review of the genotyping data, the genotype was C YP 1A2 *1A/*1A E xtensive metabolizer indeterminate.
    [Show full text]