DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:0809.1003V5 [Hep-Ph] 5 Oct 2010 Htnadgaio Aslimits Mass Graviton and Photon I.Scr N Pcltv Htnms Limits Mass Photon Speculative and Secure III

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:0809.1003V5 [Hep-Ph] 5 Oct 2010 Htnadgaio Aslimits Mass Graviton and Photon I.Scr N Pcltv Htnms Limits Mass Photon Speculative and Secure III October 7, 2010 Photon and Graviton Mass Limits Alfred Scharff Goldhaber∗,† and Michael Martin Nieto† ∗C. N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794-3840 USA and †Theoretical Division (MS B285), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA Efforts to place limits on deviations from canonical formulations of electromagnetism and gravity have probed length scales increasing dramatically over time. Historically, these studies have passed through three stages: (1) Testing the power in the inverse-square laws of Newton and Coulomb, (2) Seeking a nonzero value for the rest mass of photon or graviton, (3) Considering more degrees of freedom, allowing mass while preserving explicit gauge or general-coordinate invariance. Since our previous review the lower limit on the photon Compton wavelength has improved by four orders of magnitude, to about one astronomical unit, and rapid current progress in astronomy makes further advance likely. For gravity there have been vigorous debates about even the concept of graviton rest mass. Meanwhile there are striking observations of astronomical motions that do not fit Einstein gravity with visible sources. “Cold dark matter” (slow, invisible classical particles) fits well at large scales. “Modified Newtonian dynamics” provides the best phenomenology at galactic scales. Satisfying this phenomenology is a requirement if dark matter, perhaps as invisible classical fields, could be correct here too. “Dark energy” might be explained by a graviton-mass-like effect, with associated Compton wavelength comparable to the radius of the visible universe. We summarize significant mass limits in a table. Contents B. Einstein’s general theory of relativity and beyond? 20 C. Nonzero graviton mass: Is it possible? 21 I. Introduction 2 1. Early considerations 21 A. How to test a theory 2 B. Photons 3 2. Recent considerations 22 C. Gravitons 4 D. More perspectives on gauge and general-coordinate D. Perspectives on gauge and general-coordinate invariance 23 invariance 4 V. Phenomenology of deviations from GR 24 II. Electromagnetic theories 5 A. Power-law deviation from Coulomb’s form 5 A. Inverse square law 24 B. Photon mass from the Proca equation 5 1. Inverse square law on large scales 24 C. Conservation of electric charge 7 2. Small/large extra dimensions and “fat/thin” D. Gauge invariance, its apparent violation and ultimate gravitons 25 restoration 8 B. Speed of gravity 25 E. Higgs mechanism, or hidden gauge invariance 9 1. Temperature effect 10 1. Conceptual questions 25 2. Large-scale magnetic fields and the photon mass 11 2. Dispersion in gravitational waves 26 3. Empirical and formal considerations on the Abelian 3. Shapiro time delay and the speed of gravity 26 Higgs mechanism 11 arXiv:0809.1003v5 [hep-ph] 5 Oct 2010 C. Cold dark matter (CDM) versus modified Newtonian F. Zero-mass limit and sterile longitudinal photons 12 dynamics (MOND) 27 III. Secure and speculative photon mass limits 13 1. Cold dark matter 27 A. Local experiments 13 2. Proposed modifications of GR 28 1. Electric (“Cavendish”) experiment 13 3. Cluster collisions 29 2. Magnetic (Aharonov-Bohm) experiment 13 3. Temperature effect 13 4. Status of cold dark matter (CDM) versus modified 4. Dispersion, radio waves, and the Kroll effect 14 Newtonian dynamics (MOND) 30 B. Solar system tests 14 D. The challenge for cold dark matter 31 1. Planetary magnetic fields 14 E. Out to the far reaches of the universe 32 2. Solar wind 15 C. Cosmic tests 15 VI. Discussion and Outlook 33 1. Fields on galactic scales 15 2. The Lakes method 16 A. Conclusions 33 3. Pursuing the Higgs effect 18 B. Prospects 34 D. Photon dispersion as a lead into gravity 18 E. The primacy of length over all other measures 18 Acknowledgments 35 IV. Gravitational theories 18 A. Newton’s law of gravity 19 References 35 2 I. INTRODUCTION teresting experiment and observation for mass or “mass- like” effects indeed is restricted to the long-distance and Photons and gravitons are the only known free parti- low-frequency scales already mentioned. cles whose rest masses may be exactly zero.1 This bald statement covers a rich and complex history, from New- ton and Gauss, through Maxwell and Einstein, and even A. How to test a theory up to the present. During that development, the ma- trix of interlocking concepts surrounding the notions of Let us begin by seeking a broad perspective on what it photon and graviton rest mass, or more generally, long- means to probe, not merely the validity but also the ac- distance, low-frequency deviations from Maxwell electro- curacy of a theory. The canonical view of theory-testing dynamics and Einstein gravity, has become increasingly is that one tries to falsify the theory: One compares its elaborate. predictions with experiment and observation. The pre- There are many similarities between the photon and dictions use input data, for example initial values of cer- graviton cases, but also striking differences. We literally tain parameters, which then are translated by the theory see photons all the time, as only a few photons of visi- into predictions of new data. If these predicted data agree ble light are enough to activate one ‘pixel’ in a human with observation within experimental uncertainties (and retina. Besides that, conspicuous electromagnetic wave sometimes also uncertainties in application of the the- phenomena play an enormous role in modern physics. ory), then the theory has, for the moment, passed the For gravity the situation is radically different. Even test. One may continue to look for failures in new do- gravitational waves are in a situation analogous to that of mains of application, even if the incentive for doing so neutrinos during the first 25 years after their proposal by declines with time. Pauli, when their emission could be inferred from loss of Of course, without strong ‘ground rules’ it is impossi- energy, momentum, and angular momentum in beta de- ble to falsify a theory, because one almost always can find cay, but they hadn’t yet been detected in an absorption explanations for a failure. So, in fact no scientific theory experiment. Binary pulsar systems exhibit energy loss either may be disproved or proved in a completely rigor- well accounted-for by radiation of gravitational waves, ous way; everything always is provisional, and continual but experiments underway to detect absorption of such skepticism always is in order. However, based on a strong waves have not yet achieved positive results. Even if this pattern of success a theory can earn trust at least as great were accomplished sometime soon, the chances of ever as in any other aspect of human inquiry. detecting individual quanta – gravitons – seem remote The above is an essential, but we believe only par- indeed, because graviton coupling to matter is so enor- tial, view of how theories gain conviction. At least three mously weak. important additional factors may help to achieve that These are not the only differences. For electrodynam- result. ics, the history has been one of increasingly sensitive null First, a striking, even implausible, prediction is borne experiments giving increasingly stringent constraints on out by experiment or observation. Examples of this in- a possible mass. Nevertheless, theories describing such clude ‘Poisson’s spot’, Poisson’s devastating attack on a mass seem well-developed and consistent, even if not the notion that light is a wave phenomenon, because this esthetically appealing. On the other hand, for gravity, would require that the shadow of a circular obstacle have there are long-distance effects which some argue provide a bright spot in its center. The discovery of the spot by evidence supporting modification of Einstein’s formula- Arago provided the conceptual equivalent of a judo ma- tion. At the same time, the theoretical basis for a gravita- neuver, using the opponent’s own impulse to overcome tional phenomenon analogous to photon mass has come him. Another example is the assertion by Appelquist under severe attack. All this means that, with respect and Politzer in the summer of 1974 that the existence to the issue of deviations, currently there is much more of a heavy quark carrying the quantum number ‘charm’ dynamism for gravity than for electrodynamics. would imply the existence of a positronium-like spec- trum, meaning very sharp resonances in electron-positron Even though quantum physics gave shape to the con- scattering. When the J/ψ was discovered at BNL and cept of mass for electrodynamics and gravitation, the ob- SLAC in November of that year, the outlandish predic- vious implication of a dispersion in velocity with energy tion of Appelquist and Politzer suddenly was the best ex- for field quanta, or even for waves, is beyond our capacity planation, in good part because it was the only one that to detect with methods identified so far. This is thanks had been stated boldly beforehand (though only pub- to the very strong limits already obtained based on es- lished afterwards). sentially static fields. Thus, the domain of potentially in- A second way in which a theory gains credence is by fecundity: People see ways to apply the idea in other con- texts. If many such applications are fruitful, then by the 1 Gluons, the gauge particles of quantum chromodynamics, are time initial experimental verification is rechecked there believed to have no bare mass. However, they are not seen in may be little interest, because the theory already has be- isolation, meaning they cannot be observed as free particles. come a foundation stone for a whole array of applications. 3 An example from our subject here is the transfer of the experimental approach and precision (Section III). 1/R2 force law from gravity to electricity, in a specula- tive leap during the 1700s.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Compton Effect
    Module 5 : MODERN PHYSICS Lecture 25 : Compton Effect Objectives In this course you will learn the following Scattering of radiation from an electron (Compton effect). Compton effect provides a direct confirmation of particle nature of radiation. Why photoelectric effect cannot be exhited by a free electron. Compton Effect Photoelectric effect provides evidence that energy is quantized. In order to establish the particle nature of radiation, it is necessary that photons must carry momentum. In 1922, Arthur Compton studied the scattering of x-rays of known frequency from graphite and looked at the recoil electrons and the scattered x-rays. According to wave theory, when an electromagnetic wave of frequency is incident on an atom, it would cause electrons to oscillate. The electrons would absorb energy from the wave and re-radiate electromagnetic wave of a frequency . The frequency of scattered radiation would depend on the amount of energy absorbed from the wave, i.e. on the intensity of incident radiation and the duration of the exposure of electrons to the radiation and not on the frequency of the incident radiation. Compton found that the wavelength of the scattered radiation does not depend on the intensity of incident radiation but it depends on the angle of scattering and the wavelength of the incident beam. The wavelength of the radiation scattered at an angle is given by .where is the rest mass of the electron. The constant is known as the Compton wavelength of the electron and it has a value 0.0024 nm. The spectrum of radiation at an angle consists of two peaks, one at and the other at .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Principle of Wave–Particle Duality: an Overview
    3 1 The Principle of Wave–Particle Duality: An Overview 1.1 Introduction In the year 1900, physics entered a period of deep crisis as a number of peculiar phenomena, for which no classical explanation was possible, began to appear one after the other, starting with the famous problem of blackbody radiation. By 1923, when the “dust had settled,” it became apparent that these peculiarities had a common explanation. They revealed a novel fundamental principle of nature that wascompletelyatoddswiththeframeworkofclassicalphysics:thecelebrated principle of wave–particle duality, which can be phrased as follows. The principle of wave–particle duality: All physical entities have a dual character; they are waves and particles at the same time. Everything we used to regard as being exclusively a wave has, at the same time, a corpuscular character, while everything we thought of as strictly a particle behaves also as a wave. The relations between these two classically irreconcilable points of view—particle versus wave—are , h, E = hf p = (1.1) or, equivalently, E h f = ,= . (1.2) h p In expressions (1.1) we start off with what we traditionally considered to be solely a wave—an electromagnetic (EM) wave, for example—and we associate its wave characteristics f and (frequency and wavelength) with the corpuscular charac- teristics E and p (energy and momentum) of the corresponding particle. Conversely, in expressions (1.2), we begin with what we once regarded as purely a particle—say, an electron—and we associate its corpuscular characteristics E and p with the wave characteristics f and of the corresponding wave.
    [Show full text]
  • The Graviton Compton Mass As Dark Energy
    Gravitation, Mathematical Physics and Field Theory Revista Mexicana de F´ısica 67 040703 1–5 JULY-AUGUST 2021 The graviton Compton mass as dark energy T. Matosa and L. L.-Parrillab aDepartamento de F´ısica, Centro de Investigacion´ y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Apartado Postal 14-740, 07000, CDMX, Mexico.´ bInstituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autonoma´ de Mexico,´ Circuito Exterior C.U., Apartado Postal 70-543, 04510, CDMX, Mexico.´ Received 3 January 2021; accepted 18 February 2021 One of the greatest challenges of science is to understand the current accelerated expansion of the Universe. In this work, we show that by considering the quantum nature of the gravitational field, its wavelength can be associated with an effective Compton mass. We propose that this mass can be interpreted as dark energy, with a Compton wavelength given by the size of the observable Universe, implying that the dark energy varies depending on this size. If we do so, we find that: 1.- Even without any free constant for dark energy, the evolution of the Hubble parameter is exactly the same as for the LCDM model, so this model has the same predictions as LCDM. 2.- The density rate of the dark energy is ­¤ = 0:69 which is a very similar value as the one found by the Planck satellite ­¤ = 0:684. 3.- The dark energy has this value because it corresponds to the actual size of the radius of the Universe, thus the coincidence problem has a very natural explanation. 4.- It, is possible to find also a natural explanation to why observations inferred from the local distance ladder find the value H0 = 73 km/s/Mpc for the Hubble constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Compton Wavelength, Bohr Radius, Balmer's Formula and G-Factors
    Compton wavelength, Bohr radius, Balmer's formula and g-factors Raji Heyrovska J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Dolejškova 3, 182 23 Prague 8, Czech Republic. [email protected] Abstract. The Balmer formula for the spectrum of atomic hydrogen is shown to be analogous to that in Compton effect and is written in terms of the difference between the absorbed and emitted wavelengths. The g-factors come into play when the atom is subjected to disturbances (like changes in the magnetic and electric fields), and the electron and proton get displaced from their fixed positions giving rise to Zeeman effect, Stark effect, etc. The Bohr radius (aB) of the ground state of a hydrogen atom, the ionization energy (EH) and the Compton wavelengths, λC,e (= h/mec = 2πre) and λC,p (= h/mpc = 2πrp) of the electron and proton respectively, (see [1] for an introduction and literature), are related by the following equations, 2 EH = (1/2)(hc/λH) = (1/2)(e /κ)/aB (1) 2 2 (λC,e + λC,p) = α2πaB = α λH = α /2RH (2) (λC,e + λC,p) = (λout - λin)C,e + (λout - λin)C,p (3) α = vω/c = (re + rp)/aB = 2πaB/λH (4) aB = (αλH/2π) = c(re + rp)/vω = c(τe + τp) = cτB (5) where λH is the wavelength of the ionizing radiation, κ = 4πεo, εo is 2 the electrical permittivity of vacuum, h (= 2πħ = e /2εoαc) is the 2 Planck constant, ħ (= e /κvω) is the angular momentum of spin, α (= vω/c) is the fine structure constant, vω is the velocity of spin [2], re ( = ħ/mec) and rp ( = ħ/mpc) are the radii of the electron and
    [Show full text]
  • Compton Shift and De Broglie Frequency
    Compton shift and de Broglie frequency Raji Heyrovská J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Dolejskova 3, 182 23 Prague 8, Czech Republic. [email protected] Abstract. Compton scattering is usually explained in terms of the relativistic mass and momentum. Here, a mathematically equivalent and simple non-relativistic interpretation shows that the Compton frequency shift is equal to the de Broglie frequency associated with the moving charged particle (e.g., an electron). In this work, the moving electron is considered as a particle and the electromagnetic energy associated with it is shown to be proportional to the de Broglie frequency. This energy is released when its motion is arrested, as for example on a diffraction screen, where it causes the observed interfernce patterns. Thus, electrons transport electromagnetic energy from a source to a sink. Key words: Compton shift, de Broglie wavelength, wave/particle duality, transport of electromagnetic energy An introduction to Compton effect can be found in many books, e.g., see [1]. A bibliography on the various interpretations using relativistic and quantum theories can be found in [2]. Here, a simple non-relativistic view of the phenomenon is presented. Essentially, in Compton scattering, an incident X-ray of wavelength λin interacts with matter and the scattered ray has a longer wave length λθ, the value of which depends on the scattering angle θ from the incident ray. In the case of interaction with electrons, the Compton wavelength shift ∆λe,θ is given by [1], ∆λe,θ = λθ - λin = λC,e(1- cos θ) (1) where λC,e, the Compton wavelength (obtained as the Compton shift for θ = π/2) is found to be, 2 λC,e = (h/mec) [= (I/me) = 2π(e /κvω)(1/mec)] (2) h is the Planck constsnt and me is the rest mass of the electron.
    [Show full text]
  • Compton Wavelength −31 8 Mce (9.109×× 10Kg )( 2.998 10M / S) =×=×=2.43 10−−3 Nm 2.43 1012 M 2.43 Pm Note: 1 Pm= 1 × 10−12 M  6 Summary: Compton Scattering
    Modern Physics Unit 1: Classical Models and the Birth of Modern Physics Lecture 1.6: Compton Effect Ron Reifenberger Professor of Physics Purdue University 1 V. The Compton Effect (1923) Energy Loss Θ=30o Carbon block source of high energy photons Compton’s Apparatus (schematic) What was expected? - e f hf f hf No energy loss ! Source: Tipler and Llewellyn, Modern Physics, 4th edition2 Compton applies conservation of energy and momentum principles to explain puzzling data. Recall collision theory: Before After vi1 vi2 vf1 vf2 m m m m2 1 m22 1 Conservation of momentum: m1vf1 + m2vf2 = m1vi1 + m2vi2 Conservation of kinetic energy: 2 2 2 2 ½ m1vf1 + ½ m2vf2 = ½ m1vi1 + ½ m2vi2 3 What’s the momentum of a photon? λ Classical mechanics: p = mv p=???? E but….photon mass = 0 ⋅ from Planck E = hf ⋅ from Maxwell, the momentum of an EM Wave is: U Calculate change (see L1.03) in momentum of a p = surface when hit c by EM wave hf hf h p = = = cfλλ EM Wave h=Planck’s constant = 6.626x10-34 m2 kg/s 4 Compton’s analysis considered an X-ray photon scattering from a single electron inside a target Before After photon photon λ f electron at loses λ i rest energy me electron recoils How is λ f related to λ i ? 5 Geometry of Compton Scattering λ Initial Scattered f position of photon electron Incident photon Θ h _ λλfi−=(1 − cos Θ) mce λ i me _ Recoiling electron h 6.626×⋅ 10−34 Js ≡= Compton wavelength −31 8 mce (9.109×× 10kg )( 2.998 10m / s) =×=×=2.43 10−−3 nm 2.43 1012 m 2.43 pm Note: 1 pm= 1 × 10−12 m 6 Summary: Compton Scattering h λλfi−=(1 − cos Θ) mce energy h loss Inelastic mce λf Scattering λi λf Increases λi λi λf number of π photons h Θ= detected 2 2 mce Scattered λi = λf λi λf Beam Elastic m λ e Scattering Θ=π Θ=0 Example: EM radiation with differing wavelengths is scattered by an electron through an angle of 37o (w.r.t.
    [Show full text]
  • The Particle World
    The Particle World CERN Summer School Lectures 2021 Lectures 1 and 2: The Standard Model David Tong Further Reading around 240 pages! (Sorry) What are we made of? "If we consider protons and neutrons as elementary particles, we would have three kinds of elementary particles [p,n,e].... This number may seem large but, from that point of view, two is already a large number.” Paul Dirac 1933 Solvay Conference The Standard Model 12 particles + 4 forces + Higgs boson The Standard Model ContentsContentsContentsContents Contents 1 Introduction1 Introduction11 Introduction Introduction1 Introduction 1 1 1 1 1 1 Introduction1 Introduction11 Introduction Introduction1 Introduction The numbers in the table are the masses of the particles, written as multiples of the electron mass. (Hence the electron itself is assigned mass 1.) The masses of the neutrinosGravity are ElectromagnetismGravity knownGravity ElectromagnetismGravity to be very Electromagnetism Weak Electromagnetism smallGravity Strong but, Weak otherwise Electromagnetism Strong Weak Weak are Strong onlyStrong constrained Weak Strong within a window and not yet established individually. Each horizontal line of this diagram is called a generation. Hence, each generation consists of an electron-like particle, twoHiggs quarks, and a neutrino. The statement that each generation behaves the same means that, among other things, the electric charges of all electron-like particles in the first column are 1(inappropriateunits);theelectric −1 charges of all quarks in the second column are 3 and all those in the third column 2 − + 3 . All neutrinos are electrically neutral. We understand aspects of this horizontal pattern very well. In particular, various mathematical consistency conditions tell us that the particles must come in a collective of four particles, and their properties are largely fixed.
    [Show full text]
  • Schrödinger Equation for an Extended Electron
    Schr¨odinger equation for an extended electron Antˆonio B. Nassar Physics Department The Harvard-Westlake School 3700 Coldwater Canyon, Studio City, 91604 (USA) and Department of Sciences University of California, Los Angeles, Extension Program 10995 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (USA) Abstract A new quantum mechanical wave equation describing the dynamics of an extended electron is derived via Bohmian mechanics. The solution to this equation is found through a wave packet approach which establishes a direct correlation between a classical variable with a quantum variable describing the dynamics of the center of mass and the width of the electron wave packet. The approach presented in this paper gives a comparatively clearer picture than approaches using elaborative manipulation of infinite series of operators. It is shown that the new Schr¨odinger equation is free of any runaway solutions or any acausal responses. PACS: 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Sq, 03.70.+k 2 About a century ago, Lorentz [1] and Abraham [2] argued that when an electron is accelerated, there are additional forces acting due to the electron’s own electromagnetic field. However, the so-called Lorentz-Abraham equation for a point-charge electron dV 2e2 d2V m = + Fext (1) dt 3c3 dt2 was found to be unsatisfactory because, for Fext = 0, it admits runaway solutions. These solutions clearly violate the law of inertia. Since the seminal works of Lorentz and Abraham, inumerous papers and textbooks have given great consideration to the proper equation of motion of an electron.[3]-[11] The problematic runaway solutions were circumvented by Sommerfeld [5] and Page [6] by going to an extended model.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Λ and the Mass of the Graviton: a Critical View J.-P
    The Nature of Λ and the Mass of the Graviton: a Critical View J.-P. Gazeau, M. Novello To cite this version: J.-P. Gazeau, M. Novello. The Nature of Λ and the Mass of the Graviton: a Critical View. International Journal of Modern Physics A, World Scientific Publishing, 2011, 26, pp.3697-3720. 10.1142/S0217751X11054176. hal-00105287 HAL Id: hal-00105287 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00105287 Submitted on 11 Oct 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The nature of Λ and the mass of the graviton: A critical view J. P. Gazeau∗ and M. Novello∗∗ ∗ Laboratoire Astroparticules et Cosmologie (APC, UMR 7164), Boite 7020 Universit´eParis 7 Denis Diderot, 2 Place Jussieu, 75251 Paris Cedex 05 Fr [email protected] ∗∗ ICRA, Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, CEP 22290-180, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [email protected] October 11, 2006 Abstract The existence of a non-zero cosmological constant Λ gives rise to controversial interpretations. Is Λ a universal constant fixing the ge- ometry of an empty universe, as fundamental as the Planck constant or the speed of light in the vacuum? Its natural place is then on the left-hand side of the Einstein equation.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1704.05034V1 [Physics.Plasm-Ph] 17 Apr 2017 Lsia Potentials
    Finding quantum effects in strong classical potentials B. Manuel Hegelich,1 Lance Labun,1 and Ou Z. Labun1, 2 1Department of Physics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712 U.S.A. 2Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S.A. (Dated: 14 July 2016) The long-standing challenge to describing charged particle dynamics in strong classical electromagnetic fields is how to incorporate classical radiation, classical radiation reaction and quantized photon emission into a consistent unified framework. The current, semi- classical methods to describe dynamics of quantum particles in strong classical fields also provide the theoretical framework for fundamental questions in gravity and hadron-hadron collisions, including Hawking radiation, cosmological particle production and thermalization of particles created in heavy-ion collisions. However, as we show, these methods break down for highly relativistic particles propagating in strong fields. They must therefore be im- proved and adapted for the description of laser-plasma experiments that typically involve the acceleration of electrons. Theory developed from quantum electrodynamics, together with dedicated experimental efforts, offer the best-controllable context to establish a robust, experimentally-validated foundation for the fundamental theory of quantum effects in strong classical potentials. arXiv:1704.05034v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 17 Apr 2017 2 I. INTRODUCTION: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM RADIATION Although the photoelectric effect showed that radiation is fundamentally a quantum pro- cess, long-wavelength (λ ≫ λe = ~/mec where me is the electron mass) radiation is equally well described by solving Maxwell’s equations with a classical current as source. This classical 2 approximation works because, in weak fields, the energy of the probe ~ω = hc/λ ≪ mec is insufficient to excite the quantum structure of the electron.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analytical Study on the Compton Wavelength
    Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting PyeongChang, Korea, October 30-31, 2008 An Analytical Study on the Compton Wavelength Sun-Tae Hwang and Dong-Kwan Shin TEKCIVIL Corporation 301 Songjeon B/D, 1182 Dunsan-dong, Seogu, Daejeon 302-121, Korea 1. Introduction p of a particle are related to its rest mass m 2 2 2 4 Mathematically, the Compton wavelength λc of by the invariant relation, p ∙pc - E = -m c . a particle is given by λc = h/mc, where h is the Now, by conservation of energy, Planck constant, m is the particle's rest mass 2 2 2 1/2 and c is the speed of light. For the electron as pγ +mec = p'γ +(me c +p'e ) (3) -12 a reference constant, it is about 2.426x10 m, intermediate between the size of an atomic nu- Rearranging and squaring both sides, Eq.(4) is cleus and an atom. The λc means a critical dis- obtained. tance below which certain quantum mechanical 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 effects take place for any particle. The energy pγ +p'γ -2pγp'γ+2mec(pγ-p'γ)+me c =me c +p'e of a photon of this wavelength is equal to the (4) 2 rest mass energy mec of an electron[1]. Now, Subtraction of Eq.(2) from Eq.(4) yields the λc is analytically reviewed. mec(pγ-p'γ) = pγp'γ - pγ․p'γ (5) 2. Compton Scattering Effect Finally, dividing both sides by mecpγp'γ, Eq.(6) Compton scattering effect is the result of a for the relation between the energies of the in- high energy photon colliding with an electron.
    [Show full text]
  • Compton Scattering 1 Compton Scattering
    Compton scattering 1 Compton scattering Light–matter interaction Low-energy phenomena: Photoelectric effect Mid-energy phenomena: Thomson scattering Compton scattering High-energy phenomena: Pair production • v • t [1] • e Compton scattering is an inelastic scattering of a photon by a free charged particle, usually an electron. It results in a decrease in energy (increase in wavelength) of the photon (which may be an X-ray or gamma ray photon), called the Compton effect. Part of the energy of the photon is transferred to the recoiling electron. Inverse Compton scattering also exists, in which a charged particle transfers part of its energy to a photon. Introduction Compton scattering is an example of inelastic scattering, because the wavelength of the scattered light is different from the incident radiation. Still, the origin of the effect can be considered as an elastic collision between a photon and an electron. The amount the wavelength changes by is called the Compton shift. Although nuclear Compton scattering exists, Compton scattering usually refers to the interaction involving only the electrons of an atom. The Compton effect was observed by Arthur Holly Compton in 1923 at Washington University in St. Louis and further verified by his graduate student Y. H. Woo in the years following. Compton earned the 1927 Nobel Prize in Physics for the discovery. The effect is important because it demonstrates that light cannot be explained purely as a wave phenomenon. Thomson scattering, the classical theory of an electromagnetic wave scattered by charged particles, cannot explain low intensity shifts in wavelength. (Classically, light of sufficient intensity for the electric field to accelerate a charged particle to a relativistic speed will cause radiation-pressure recoil and an associated Doppler shift of the scattered light,[2] but the effect would become arbitrarily small at sufficiently low light intensities regardless of wavelength.) Light must behave as if it consists of particles to explain the low-intensity Compton scattering.
    [Show full text]