From Frank Crameri

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Frank Crameri THE KOO WEE RUP BLACKFISH JULY 2012 FRIDAY, 22 JUNE 2012 THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES (Edited Extracts) The Township held its monthly meeting on Wednesday, 6 June. Township Meetings are open to anyone who would like to attend. The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, 4 July at 7:30 pm at the Community Centre. The president, Frank Crameri, reflected on the sad note of resignation received from Jack Nunn. He said that Jack’s resignation, due to ill health, would be a big gap to fill. Jack always did an excellent job communicating with the Shire and getting things done quickly and thoroughly. He will be sorely missed. The president said that at the recent meeting of Bypass landowners, he had talked to Edward O’Donohue MLC, on the subject of ‘Gas for Koo-Wee-Rup’. The secretary had then written to Edward and had asked him if he would address the July meeting of the Township Committee on this subject. Edward had declined, saying that he was unavailable on that date. The secretary was asked to write to Edward again and ask him to address the August meeting of the Committee. The president expressed his disappointment in the response of VicRoads to our letter about the obvious dangers of the recently built pedestrian crossing in Station Street. Dennis Divola asked why there was no wire mesh fence to guide pedestrians to the crossing and also why no fence on the refuge in the centre of the road? Our guest from VicRoads, Charlie Broadhurst, said that he would talk to his VicRoads colleagues about the reason why no fence is installed at this crossing and he will let us know the outcome. Ray Brown asked if the second roll-out for State gas projects had been finalised yet. Cr. Halligan replied simply – not yet. However he said that the Shire Council has been pushing hard trying to get a gas off-take, from the main pipeline into Bayles for a large user Company, resident in the Town. The Council is also endeavouring to get a potable water line from the proposed new water off-take in Koo-Wee-Rup at the same time. If this took place then it could be that a gas pipeline would continue to Koo-Wee-Rup. A short discussion took place about the need for continued ongoing contact with our politicians and the Minister on the subject. The secretary was asked to write again to Peter Ryan MP, Minister for Regional and Rural Development, and ask for an update on ‘Gas for Koo-Wee-Rup’. Continued Page 4 Items printed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the thoughts or beliefs of the Editor. The Editor reserves the right to edit any items, where necessary. All work associated with the production of The Koo Wee Rup Blackfish is done on a voluntary basis. Edited by C Roff email: [email protected] PO Box 64, Koo Wee Rup 3981, Tel 5997 2333 Printed by KWR Township Committee The Koo Wee Rup Blackfish July 2012 DO YOU OWN A DOG? If you answered YES to any of these questions then you need K9 Services Your local Mobile Dog Groomer and Dog Trainer. Also home of Koo Wee K9 Bootcamp, the only group dog training club in Koo Wee Rup. Contact Carol on 0412 076 095 Have a look at us on Facebook under Koo Wee K9 Bootcamp Page 2 The Koo Wee Rup Blackfish July 2012 KOO WEE RUP BYPASS PROJECT UPDATE Charlie Broadhurst, Project Director, and Rob Pearson, Team Leader, Project Delivery, representing VicRoads, made a presentation to the Township Committee. With the aid of a large map plan of the Bypass route, they described the project progress to date. It is proposed that the Koo Wee Rup Bypass will follow close contact with the land owners of properties that will an alignment linking Healesville/Koo-Wee-Rup Road with require acquisition. Rossiter Road, running to the south and west of the Koo- Anticipated dates are as follows: Wee-Rup Township. Planning report and draft planning scheme In the 2012 State Budget the Victorian Government amendments: mid 2012. provided an additional $16 million for the Bypass. The Land acquisition: early-mid 2013. increase was required due to construction and Construction start: mid 2013, taking full advantage environmental complexities. The Total Estimated Cost for of the summer months. the Bypass is $66 million fully funded by the Victorian Project completion: late 2015. Government. Questions from the floor: The Koo Wee Rup Bypass will include: - Q. How confident are you that there is enough money . A single lane in each direction between for the project? Healesville/Koo Wee-Rup-Road and the South A. The new design is now seen as complying with Gippsland Highway. budgetary constraints even though most of the required 9 . New intersections at Manks Road and Rossiter Road. metre land-fill will have to be imported. There is also an An A-grade intersection at Railway Road. The design allowance for escalation risk. of the Railway Road intersection is still to be Q. Will the unused land be returned for community finalised. purposes? . A new 260m bridge with 9 spans across the Bunyip A. Possibly ... but it will be sold back. River drains. Q. What is the difference in cost if the Bypass road went . A roundabout at Rossiter Road and the South straight over Rossiter Road directly to the South Gippsland Gippsland Highway. highway without a round-about? The overall length of the Bypass is 3.4km. A. A substantial difference; acquisition cost alone would A ‘T’ intersection leading to Station Street. be in the region of $4m. Extensive precautions against water flooding. Q. How do you propose to force trucks to use the Bypass A Planning Scheme Amendment (PSA) is required to and not use Sybella Avenue? reserve the necessary land in the Shire of Cardinia A. We have not looked at that situation yet. VicRoads is planning scheme and this process requires environmental conscious of the fact that most people will choose the approval by the Commonwealth Department of Bypass, including truck drivers. The situation will be Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and assessed when it arrives. Communities (DSEWPaC) and the Victorian Department of Q. If the railway line is re-opened will this impact on the Planning and Community Development (DPCD). Bypass and fauna control? The PSA process has been delayed due to requests for A. No. We have received expert opinion on bandicoot additional and more detailed information by DSEWPaC behaviour and the construction of culverts to allow for particularly concerning impacts to some threatened fauna their movements along the corridor. species, such as the Southern Brown Bandicoot, the Q. How wide is the Bypass road? Growling Grass Frog, the Australian Grayling and the A. There will be 2x3.5m traffic lanes, each with a 2m Swamp Skink. A detailed fauna management plan has hard shoulder and a 2m wide verge behind the shoulder. recently been submitted to DSEWPaC for approval. For your information, the height of the bridge is 4m over The PSA is expected to be put on public exhibition in mid access tracks with a fill of 6-7m required. 2012. Documentation will be made available and a copy Q. Will there be a noise problem? can be downloaded from the VicRoads’ web site. A. There will be no substantial noise. However, there is The Bypass is expected to require some land acquisition one property where noise barriers may be required. from 10 private properties. In 3 of these cases it is Q. Will the Bypass be suitable for B Double trucks? expected that VicRoads will be requested to acquire the A. Yes. The Bypass will cater for B Double trucks. entire property. Charlie explained the land acquisition At the conclusion of Charlie and Rob’s presentation the and valuation processes with the necessary action to be president thanked both gentlemen for the information taken. After the report is approved by the planning they had given and for their time in attending the minister there will be two public meetings in July 2012 for meeting. landowners to make submissions. VicRoads will be in Page 3 The Koo Wee Rup Blackfish July 2012 THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES (from Page 1) From the floor a complaint yet again about the state of the road surface of Moody Street, in particular outside of the Primary School. Although there has been no specific reply to our letter of complaint, the potholes were filled in but are now as bad as ever. Cr. Halligan said he had spoken to Paul Richardson, Manger, Assets and Development, and he had said there was an unresolved conflict about who should pay for sealing this short stretch of roadway. At present the Council wants the residents to pay 1/3 and the council will pay the other 2/3 of the costs. Cr. Halligan said that he had asked for a report on the progress and he will advise the outcome at our next meeting in July. The president introduced to the meeting Charlie Broadhurst, Project Director, and Rob Pearson, Team Leader, Project Delivery, representing VicRoads, their report on the proposed Koo Wee Rup Bypass is detailed on page 3. Introducing Cr. Halligan and his report, the president welcomed the Councillor back to the regular meetings of the Committee after an absence of three months. Cr. Halligan commenced by giving the meeting news about the proposed removal of the Railway House in Cochrane Park. He said that the intended removal to Bayles Fauna Park had generated lots of ‘red tape’ from the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) and could not be located to the Park.
Recommended publications
  • Melbourne Supply Area–Extractive Industry Interest Areas Review
    DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review Geological Survey of Victoria Technical Record 2003/2 A. Olshina & P. Burn Bibliographic reference: Olshina, A. & Burn, P., 2003. Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review. Geological Survey of Victoria. Technical Record 2003/2. Geological Survey of Victoria. Ó Crown (State of Victoria) Copyright 2003 Geological Survey of Victoria ISSN 1324 0307 ISBN 1 74106 838 X Keywords: extractive industry, quarry, planning, Melbourne, Victoria, stone resources, sand resources This report may be purchased from: The authors would like to thank Gayle Ellis for Business Centre, proofreading and typesetting this report. Department of Primary Industries Eighth Floor, 240 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, 3002 Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the Or accessed at: State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/ that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and For further technical information contact: therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or Manager, other consequences which may arise from you relying Geological Survey of Victoria, on any information in this publication. P O Box 500 East Melbourne 3002. Acknowledgments: Many of the original concepts and planning policies used in this report were developed by Barbara Guerin and the Environment and Natural Resources Committee (ENRC) and by Frank Jiricek, formerly of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment. The following MPD staff contributed to this document: Ben White provided significant assistance to the consultation process for this report. Roger Buckley and Linda Bibby provided valuable input to the contents of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Begins
    VICTORIA. ANNO QUADRAGESIMO QUINTO VICTORIA BEGINS. No. DCCII. An Act for the Reform of the Constitution. [Reserved 27th Jane 1881. Royal Assent proclaimed 28th November 1881.] HEREAS it is desirable to make provision for the effectual Preamble, W representation of the people in the Legislative Council : Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of Victoria in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same as follows (that is to say) :— 1. This Act shall be called and may be cited as The Legislative short title and Council Act 1881, and shall commence and come into force on the day commencement on which the Governor shall signify that Her Majesty has been pleased to assent thereto and it is divided into parts as follows— PART L—Number of provinces and number and distribution of members, ss. 4-7. PART II.—Periodical elections and tenure of seats, ss. 8-10. PART III.—Qualifications &c. of members, ss. 11-17. PART IV.—Qualification of electors, ss. 18-26. PART V.—Rolls of ratepaying electors, ss. 27-31. PART VI.—Miscellaneous provisions, ss. 32-48. 2. The Acts mentioned in the First Schedule to this Act are Repeal of Acts in hereby repealed from and after the commencement of this Act to the First Schedule. extent specified in the third column of the said Schedule : Provided that— (1.) Any enactment or document referring to any Act hereby repealed shall be construed to refer to this Act or to the corresponding enactment in this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Victrack.Pdf 61.76 Kb
    CORRECTED VERSION SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LAND DEVELOPMENT Melbourne — 31 January 2008 Members Mr D. Davis Ms S. Pennicuik Mr P.Hall Mr B. Tee Mr P. Kavanagh Mr E. Thornley Mr E. O’Donohue Chair: Mr D. Davis Deputy Chair: Mr B. Tee Staff Secretary: Mr R. Willis Research Officer: Ms C. Williams Witness Mr G. Holt, chief executive officer, VicTrack. 31 January 2008 Select Committee on Public Land Development 1 The CHAIR — I welcome Mr Greg Holt, the chief executive officer of VicTrack, to the hearing today. If you would like to proceed with any comments you want to make, then we will ask some questions. Mr HOLT — Yes, Chair. It is my intention to read from a witness statement, copies of which are being distributed now, and take questions at the end of that, if that is permissible. I am the chief executive of Victorian Rail Tack (VicTrack), level 8, 1010 La Trobe Street, Docklands. I commenced in that position in September 2007. I attend before the select committee on behalf of VicTrack. VicTrack is a statutory corporation established under and governed by the Rail Corporations Act 1996 and is subject to joint directions of the Minister for Public Transport and of the Treasurer. VicTrack reports to the Minister for Public Transport and the Treasurer through an independent board. I have received a letter from the Minister for Public Transport, dated 29 January 2008, which attached a letter from the Attorney-General to the minister of the same date. The Attorney-General’s letter enclosed correspondence with the select committee regarding the executive government’s position on the scope of the terms of reference of the select committee.
    [Show full text]
  • I I I I I I I I I I I
    Department of Planning & Development I. Department of Housing and Regional Development I MELBOURNE METRO PO LITAN STRATEGY I STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEVIELOPMiENT I PROJECTS & PROGRAMS · I FINAL REPORT APPENDICES SOUTH EAST REGION I I I I I I I I I I I I SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I N I E I R in association with I Spiller Gibbins Swan Pty Ltd Travers Morgan Pty Ltd I Loder & Bayly Consulting Group I October 1995 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Department of Planning & Development .I Department of Housing and Regional Developm_ent . ; •• J MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN STRATEGY STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE .. I INFRASTRUCTURE LIBRARY l . DEVELOPMENT \\\i\~~~~~~~~li!~~~\11] PROJECTS & PROGRAMS ·.I ~ ~-~~ -----~---- FINAL REPORT APPENDICES I SOUTH .EAST REGION I .. ·Ii I I Transport Library I· ·I· I I ~ ·I - - - - - -- --- -- --- 711. 4099 00105983 451 MEL:M M lb t . 1 l ·I (1 995) e ourne me r~po 1tan i strategy : strateg1c v. 2 copy 2 infrastructure development projects and program~. l I South East Region : final 1 -~~---~---~~~~--~ . ~- - ) 1- SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I N I E I R in association with .1 Spiller Gibbins Swan Pty_ Ltd . :J Travers Morgan Pty Ltd :I Loder & Bayly Consulting Group ·. ! . • J I October 1995 ..r l I LIST OF APPENDICES I Appendix A- National, State .. and Metropolitan Policies I· Appendix B - Policies of Regional Organisations - Appendix C - Policies of Local Government I Appendix D - Strategic Objectives of Service Providers I Appendix E -:- Detailed Description of Region Appendix F - Industry and Business Interviews I .
    [Show full text]
  • Cardinia Shire Council 170.30 Kb
    Inquiry into Growing the Suburbs Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne Submission by Cardinia Shire Council January 2012 Inquiry into Growing the Suburbs Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne Submission by Cardinia Shire Council – January 2012 1. Introduction The Cardinia Shire Council welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the Inquiry into Growing the Suburbs - Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne being conducted by the Outer Suburban Interface Services and Development Committee. Council is an interface municipality experiencing rapid population growth as a result of the expansion of metropolitan Melbourne, and the delivery of infrastructure and provision of local business development and employment are critical to achieving sustainable growth. 2. About the Cardinia Shire The Cardinia Shire is an interface municipality located to the south east of Melbourne. The Cardinia Shire has an area of 1280 square kilometres, approximately 10% of which is located within the metropolitan urban growth boundary between Beaconsfield and Pakenham. There are 27 rural townships and communities located outside the urban growth boundary. 1 Inquiry into Growing the Suburbs Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne Submission by Cardinia Shire Council – January 2012 The population in the Cardinia Shire is forecast to grow from a current population of 76,000 people to 152,000 in 2030 as shown in the following graph. The Casey Cardinia Region comprising the City of Casey and Shire of Cardinia is forecast to grow from a current population of approximately 320,000 people to approximately 550,000 people by 2030 which will create significant demands for infrastructure and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna Assessment Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project
    APA Transmission Pty Limited Flora and Fauna Assessment Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project 10 September 2018 31- 02984.01 DOCUMENTATION CONTROL MONARC ENVIRONMENTAL Report Title: Flora and Fauna Assessment – Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project Volume: 1 of 1 Author: Monarc Environmental Client: APA Transmission Pty Ltd Document Number: 31-02984.01 Version Number: Final Document Reference: 31-02984.00 Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project DOCUMENT APPROVALS TITLE NAME SIGNATURE DATE Senior Environmental Consultant Colin Clay Prepared Senior Zoologist John Harris 27 Aug 2018 Senior Environmental Scientist Mark Vergara Senior Environmental Scientist Mark Vergara Revised 10 Sept 2018 Principal Environmental Scientist Dr. Bram Mason Approved Principal Environmental Scientist Dr. Bram Mason 10 Sept 2018 DISTRIBUTION RECORD VERSION NO. COPY NO. HOLDER DATE Draft v2 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 03 08 2018 Draft v3 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 21 08 2018 Draft v4 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 28 08 2018 Draft v5 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 04 09 2018 Final 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 10 09 2018 31-02984.00 APA Transmission Pty Limited Page | ii Flora and Fauna Assessment for the Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Background APA Transmission Pty Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the APA Group (together referred to as APA) is proposing to construct and operate a high pressure gas pipeline which will connect AGL’s proposed Gas Import Jetty at Crib Point to the Victorian Transmission System (VTS), near Pakenham. Upon completion, APA transmission pipeline and AGL’s Gas Import Jetty will increase energy security and supply stability to Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here to View Asset
    VICTORIAN Autumn 10 Issue 48 & CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT SOIL AND SOIL CARBON FEATURE Dairying in a changing climate Farm audits reduce greenhouse emissions North east projects link soil health and soil carbon Victorian Landcare and Catchment Management A UTUMN 10 ISSUE 48 Contents 8 03 From the Minister 04 Dairying in a changing climate Stuart and Jacqui Tracy from Waratah Bay in South Gippsland are adjusting their farming system in response to the changing climate. 06 Farm audits reduce greenhouse emissions Fifty farmers have achieved energy, waste and water reductions from participating in the Westernport Greenhouse Emissions Project. 08 Yea field day uncovers soil essentials Groundcover and soils ecologist Dr Christine Jones explains the importance of improving soil quality. 10 North east projects link soil health with soil carbon Groundcover is essential for healthy soil. Landcare groups and farmers in the north east are discovering how soil carbon can reverse degradation, build soil health and improve productivity. 12 Volunteers – where to find them and how to keep them A series of workshops has helped Landcare groups identify their need for 11 volunteers and learn new ways to reach out into the community. 15 Next stop Hilda Falls A successful Landcare partnership in South Gippsland is transforming a degraded site into a scenic railway destination. 16 Starting up a Landcare network Practical advice for groups considering forming or joining a Landcare network. 20 Mistletoe and tree stress The Victorian Mobile Landcare Group tackles a serious mistletoe infestation at Benalla. 22 Regional roundup Dung beetles ready for release in the Find out what’s happening in Landcare across Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA APPENDIX Council Meeting
    AGENDA APPENDIX Council Meeting Wednesday 28 May 2014 AGENDA ITEM FOR SEPARATE DISTRIBUTION TO COUNCILLORS AND EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP TEAM DUE TO DOCUMENT SIZE. THE ITEM IS ACCESSIBLE VIA THE COUNCIL WEBSITE OR BY CONTACTING COUNCIL ON 03 5662 9200. E.7 PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C92 (VOLUNTEER HERITAGE OVERLAY) - ADOPTION Appendix 1 – South Gippsland Heritage Study, Amendment C92 Heritage Citations April 2014 SOUTH GIPPSLAND SHIRE HERITAGE STUDY AMENDMENT C92 HERITAGE CITATIONS APRIL 2014 Table of Contents Background i Amendment C92 heritage review i Introduction ii Purpose ii How to use ii Introduction ii History ii Description iii Statement of significance iii Recommendations iii Sources iii INDEX TO CITATIONS iv HERITAGE PLACE CITATIONS v The front cover shows (from top) ‘Ingleside’ (former), Toora North, ‘Wrigwell’ at Jeetho, and trees at the Ogilvy homestead site, Mirboo North. ii II HERITAGE PLACE CITATIONS Background The South Gippsland Shire Heritage Study (hereafter referred to as the 2004 Study) prepared by David Helms Heritage Planning was completed in 2004. Following the completion of the 2004 Study, the citations for heritage places and precincts of local significance were transferred (either wholly or in part) into the Hermes heritage database. Since the completion of the 2004 Study some, but not all, of the places of local significance have been included in the Heritage Overlay. Amendment C92 heritage review David Helms Heritage Planning was appointed to undertake a review of 18 heritage places where owners provided consent to be included in the HO as part of Amendment C92. The places included ten (10) places of local significance that were fully assessed by the 2004 Study and eight (8) places of potential significance that were not assessed by the 2004 Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Casey Planning Scheme Amendment C119
    Planning and Environment Act 1987 CASEY PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C119 CRANBOURNE EAST PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS Report of a Panel Pursuant to Sections 96B, 153 and 155 of the Act Panel: Kathryn Mitchell, Chair Rodger Eade Des Grogan 25 February 2010 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 CASEY PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C119 CRANBOURNE EAST PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS Report of a Panel Pursuant to Sections 96B, 153 and 155 of the Act Kathryn Mitchell, Chair Rodger Eade, Member Des Grogan, Member 25 February 2010 Page 2 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................6 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................9 2. CRANBOURNE EAST PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN..................................12 2.1 THE PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN .............................................................................12 2.2 THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN .............................................................15 2.3 THE PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS....................................................................16 2.4 OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE AMENDMENT ..................................................................18 2.5 THE AMENDMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF PLANNING POLICY
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010 –11 Cover: Artist’S Impression of the Glen Waverley Transit-Oriented Development
    Annual Report 2010 –11 Cover: Artist’s impression of the Glen Waverley Transit-Oriented Development. l VicTrack Annual Report 2010–11 Contents 1 – About VictrAck 2 VicTrack – a snapshot 2 Chair’s Report 3 Core functions and business units 4 2 – outcomes report 5 Delivering value to transport 5 Delivering value to whole-of-government 7 Letter to Ministers 3 – stAtutory And FinAnciAl reporting 8 Corporate governance 8 Statutory information 11 Financial performance 13 Independent auditor’s report 15 17 August 2011 Statutory Statement 17 Comprehensive Operating Statement 18 The Hon Terry Mulder MP The Hon Kim Wells MP Balance Sheet 19 Treasurer Minister for Public Transport Statement of changes in equity 20 Level 16, 121 Exhibition Street 1 Treasury Place Cash flow Statement 22 Melbourne VIC 3000 East Melbourne VIC 3002 Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2011 23 Disclosure index 76 Dear Ministers I have much pleasure in submitting the Annual Report for VicTrack Appendices 78 for the period of 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011 for your presentation to Crossing Upgrades 2010–11 78 Parliament. Board members 79 Yours sincerely Executive team and organisational structure 80 Mission, vision, values 81 Bruce Cohen Chair Part 1 – About VicTrack 1 Part One – About VicTrack VicTrack – a snapshot Victorian Rail Track (VicTrack) is a Victorian VicTrack undertakes property, telecommunications Government business enterprise with a and other commercial activities, ranging from property development that supports transport, objectives and charter to add value to the State’s public extensions to its fibre optic network to investments in transport assets (primarily rail) and support freight terminals under its control.
    [Show full text]
  • Baw Baw Shire
    Baw Baw Shire 2011 Census results Comparison year: 2006 Benchmark area: Regional VIC community profile Compiled and presented in profile.id®. http://profile.id.com.au/baw­baw Table of contents Estimated Resident Population (ERP) 2 Population highlights 4 About the areas 7 Five year age groups 10 Ancestry 13 Birthplace 16 Year of arrival in Australia 18 Proficiency in English 20 Language spoken at home 23 Religion 26 Qualifications 28 Highest level of schooling 30 Education institution attending 33 Need for assistance 36 Employment status 39 Industry sectors of employment 42 Occupations of employment 45 Method of travel to work 48 Volunteer work 50 Unpaid care 52 Individual income 54 Household income 56 Households summary 58 Household size 61 Dwelling type 64 Number of bedrooms per dwelling 66 Internet connection 68 Number of cars per household 70 Housing tenure 72 Housing loan repayments 74 Housing rental payments 76 SEIFA - disadvantage 79 About the community profile 80 Estimated Resident Population (ERP) The Estimated Resident Population is the OFFICIAL Baw Baw Shire population for 2012. Populations are counted and estimated in various ways. The most comprehensive population count available in Australia is derived from the Census of Population and Housing conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics every five years. However the Census count is NOT the official population of Baw Baw Shire. To provide a more accurate population figure which is updated more frequently than every five years, the Australian Bureau of Statistics also produces "Estimated Resident Population" (ERP) numbers for Baw Baw Shire. See data notes for a detailed explanation of different population types, how they are calculated and when to use each one.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Environmental History of South Gippsland Shire
    South Gippsland Heritage Study V OLUME 1 THEMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY December 2004 The front cover shows (from top): The silos at Knox’s Rockhill Farm, near Leongatha An unidentified church at Loch ‘Woodlands’, Old Dollar Road, Stony Creek South Gippsland Heritage Study Volume 1 Thematic Environmental History Prepared for South Gippsland Shire in 1998 by Australian Heritage Group Reviewed in 2004 by David Helms Contents Preface vii Acknowledgments ix Introduction 13 The heritage setting of South Gippsland Shire 13 1.1 Purpose 14 1.2 Background 15 1.3 Structure 15 1.4 Historical overview 15 Table 1 – Thematic history historical overview 16 Explorers and first contact 17 Introduction 18 2.1 Aboriginal territories and European effects 18 Territories and Language Groups 18 Effects of Europeans on Aboriginal life 18 2.2 Explorers by sea 20 Pre-1800 explorations and misadventures 20 Explorations from 1800 to 1826 22 Early 1840s explorations leading to permanent settlement 24 2.3 Sealing, whaling and Wattle bark stripping 24 Environmental context 24 Sealing 25 Whaling 25 Wattle bark stripping connections with Tasmania and Port Fairy 27 2.4 Explorers by land 28 Hovell (1826) 28 McMillan (1839-41) 28 Macarthur & Strzelecki (1840) 28 Anderson (1840) 29 Brodribb (1841) 30 Robinson (1844) 30 Heritage 31 i South Gippsland Heritage Study 2004 Thematic Environmental History of South Gippsland Shire Settling the land 33 Introduction 33 History 34 3.1 Pastoral era 34 Introduction 34 Coastal footholds 34 Grazing and cattle runs 35 3.2 Selection era
    [Show full text]