DOCSLIB.ORG

Casey Planning Scheme Amendment C119

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Casey Planning Scheme Amendment C119 Planning and Environment Act 1987 CASEY PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C119 CRANBOURNE EAST PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS Report of a Panel Pursuant to Sections 96B, 153 and 155 of the Act Panel: Kathryn Mitchell, Chair Rodger Eade Des Grogan 25 February 2010 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 CASEY PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C119 CRANBOURNE EAST PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS Report of a Panel Pursuant to Sections 96B, 153 and 155 of the Act Kathryn Mitchell, Chair Rodger Eade, Member Des Grogan, Member 25 February 2010 Page 2 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................6 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................9 2. CRANBOURNE EAST PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN..................................12 2.1 THE PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN .............................................................................12 2.2 THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN .............................................................15 2.3 THE PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS....................................................................16 2.4 OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE AMENDMENT ..................................................................18 2.5 THE AMENDMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF PLANNING POLICY ....................................19 2.6 THE VISION FOR CRANBOURNE EAST........................................................................22 2.7 THE PANEL’S APPROACH TO RESOLVING ISSUES......................................................22 3. CASEY NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRE...........................................24 3.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................24 3.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................26 3.3 SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE ....................................................................................27 3.4 PANEL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................33 4. CASEY FIELDS BOULEVARD ...............................................................................37 4.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................37 4.2 DENNIS FAMILY CORPORATION ................................................................................38 4.3 DEVINE .......................................................................................................................40 4.4 RD 11 INTERSECTION.................................................................................................44 4.5 PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................47 5. OTHER TRAFFIC AND ACCESS ISSUES...........................................................49 5.1 ACCESS FROM PEET LAND TO SOUTH GIPPSLAND HIGHWAY ..................................49 5.2 VILLAWOOD ‐ CLYDE FIVE WAYS ROAD ...................................................................50 5.3 D SPEC AND R SPEC ................................................................................................52 6. DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN.......................................................53 6.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................53 6.2 PRINCIPLES UNDERPINNING THE DCP .....................................................................54 6.3 THE TEMPLATE APPROACH TO DCP TREATMENT OF INTERSECTIONS ....................56 6.4 FUNDING WORKS IN LIEU..........................................................................................57 6.5 SINGLE OR TWO CHARGE AREAS ..............................................................................59 Page 3 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 6.6 CONTINGENCIES.........................................................................................................63 6.7 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ....................................................................................67 6.8 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE.................................................................................69 6.9 PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................71 7. ROMAN CATHOLIC TRUST.................................................................................72 7.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................72 7.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................72 7.3 SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE ....................................................................................73 7.4 PANEL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................77 8. NORTHERN PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ....................................................................83 8.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................83 8.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................84 8.3 SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE ....................................................................................84 8.4 PANEL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................86 9. BLUE HILLS................................................................................................................88 9.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................88 9.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................89 9.3 SUBMISSIONS ..............................................................................................................90 9.4 PANEL FINDINGS........................................................................................................93 10. COLLISON ESTATE .................................................................................................94 10.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................94 10.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................94 10.3 SUBMISSIONS ..............................................................................................................95 10.4 PANEL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................96 11. OTHER ISSUES .........................................................................................................98 11.1 WARREN LAND ..........................................................................................................98 11.2 KEYS LAND...............................................................................................................100 11.3 CHRISTOFOROU LAND .............................................................................................103 11.4 WEBB LAND..............................................................................................................103 11.5 OAKBEE ....................................................................................................................103 11.6 CULTURAL HERITAGE ..............................................................................................106 11.7 OTHER PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN ISSUES ...........................................................107 Page 4 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 12. PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS..........................................................112 12.1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................112 12.2 P914/08 ‐ SOFRA.......................................................................................................112 12.3 P915/08 ‐ GEO PROPERTIES.....................................................................................112 12.4 P917/08 ‐ DEVINE.....................................................................................................113 12.5 P918/08 – CLARKSON DEVELOPMENTS ...................................................................114 12.6 P919/08 ‐ STOCKLAND .............................................................................................115 12.7 P920/08 – VILLAWOOD PROPERTIES........................................................................115 12.8 P921/08 ‐ MARVELLI ................................................................................................116 12. PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................116 13. PANEL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............................117 APPENDICES 1. List of Submittors 2. Revised Permit Conditions 3. Document List Page 5 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Budget Submission
    2012-13 Pre-Budget Submission January 2012 Contents 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Public transport is a priority ...................................................................................... 1 1.3 Australia’s Clean Energy Future ................................................................................. 1 1.3.1 Inequities in the coverage of transport .......................................................................... 1 1.3.2 Lifecycle impact of biofuels ............................................................................................ 1 1.3.3 Mitigating the unintended consequences ...................................................................... 2 1.4 Fixing the transport imbalance .................................................................................. 2 1.4.1 Expanding coverage of fast, frequent public transport .................................................. 2 1.4.2 Cutting delays ................................................................................................................. 3 1.4.3 False solutions ................................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Freight transport ....................................................................................................... 4 2 Public
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Supply Area–Extractive Industry Interest Areas Review
    DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review Geological Survey of Victoria Technical Record 2003/2 A. Olshina & P. Burn Bibliographic reference: Olshina, A. & Burn, P., 2003. Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review. Geological Survey of Victoria. Technical Record 2003/2. Geological Survey of Victoria. Ó Crown (State of Victoria) Copyright 2003 Geological Survey of Victoria ISSN 1324 0307 ISBN 1 74106 838 X Keywords: extractive industry, quarry, planning, Melbourne, Victoria, stone resources, sand resources This report may be purchased from: The authors would like to thank Gayle Ellis for Business Centre, proofreading and typesetting this report. Department of Primary Industries Eighth Floor, 240 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, 3002 Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the Or accessed at: State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/ that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and For further technical information contact: therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or Manager, other consequences which may arise from you relying Geological Survey of Victoria, on any information in this publication. P O Box 500 East Melbourne 3002. Acknowledgments: Many of the original concepts and planning policies used in this report were developed by Barbara Guerin and the Environment and Natural Resources Committee (ENRC) and by Frank Jiricek, formerly of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment. The following MPD staff contributed to this document: Ben White provided significant assistance to the consultation process for this report. Roger Buckley and Linda Bibby provided valuable input to the contents of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Begins
    VICTORIA. ANNO QUADRAGESIMO QUINTO VICTORIA BEGINS. No. DCCII. An Act for the Reform of the Constitution. [Reserved 27th Jane 1881. Royal Assent proclaimed 28th November 1881.] HEREAS it is desirable to make provision for the effectual Preamble, W representation of the people in the Legislative Council : Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of Victoria in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same as follows (that is to say) :— 1. This Act shall be called and may be cited as The Legislative short title and Council Act 1881, and shall commence and come into force on the day commencement on which the Governor shall signify that Her Majesty has been pleased to assent thereto and it is divided into parts as follows— PART L—Number of provinces and number and distribution of members, ss. 4-7. PART II.—Periodical elections and tenure of seats, ss. 8-10. PART III.—Qualifications &c. of members, ss. 11-17. PART IV.—Qualification of electors, ss. 18-26. PART V.—Rolls of ratepaying electors, ss. 27-31. PART VI.—Miscellaneous provisions, ss. 32-48. 2. The Acts mentioned in the First Schedule to this Act are Repeal of Acts in hereby repealed from and after the commencement of this Act to the First Schedule. extent specified in the third column of the said Schedule : Provided that— (1.) Any enactment or document referring to any Act hereby repealed shall be construed to refer to this Act or to the corresponding enactment in this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Churches the History of Churches in the Area August 2017
    Preserving Our Heritage Newsletter Volume 14 Number 3 August 2017 President: Robert Sage Secretary: Lyn Skillern Tel 56686304 Mobile 0400249048 Society rooms number: 56622492 The Society rooms are open Thursdays and Fridays between 12 & 4pm Email: [email protected] Website: www.leongathahistory.org.au PO Box 431 Leongatha 3953 Latest News The Annual Meeting The Annual Meeting of the Leongatha Historical Society will be held on September 13th at 8 pm. Please come along and hear our guest speaker Tony Courtney. Tony will be speaking about The Knights of St John who were involved in the Crusades and moved around the Mediterranean Sea in the middle ages and beyond. Tony has recently toured the historic sites related to the Knights of St John and has prepared a presentation for us. Subs for the year 2017-18 are now due Daffodil Festival The Daffodil Festival will be run on September 1st, 2nd and 3rd. For this year’s festival we will be opened for the three days from 10 am until 4 pm. Our special exhibition will be of a complete collection of Anzac tins together with information related to the events shown on the tins as they relate to our area. We need your help during the festival to man the museum A special Sale of Ian Lester’s books A sale of historical and special interest books from Ian’s personal collection will be held during the Daffodil Festival. As many of you will know Ian Lester has been living at Hillside Hostel in Korumburra following a slight stroke.
    [Show full text]
  • Victrack.Pdf 61.76 Kb
    CORRECTED VERSION SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LAND DEVELOPMENT Melbourne — 31 January 2008 Members Mr D. Davis Ms S. Pennicuik Mr P.Hall Mr B. Tee Mr P. Kavanagh Mr E. Thornley Mr E. O’Donohue Chair: Mr D. Davis Deputy Chair: Mr B. Tee Staff Secretary: Mr R. Willis Research Officer: Ms C. Williams Witness Mr G. Holt, chief executive officer, VicTrack. 31 January 2008 Select Committee on Public Land Development 1 The CHAIR — I welcome Mr Greg Holt, the chief executive officer of VicTrack, to the hearing today. If you would like to proceed with any comments you want to make, then we will ask some questions. Mr HOLT — Yes, Chair. It is my intention to read from a witness statement, copies of which are being distributed now, and take questions at the end of that, if that is permissible. I am the chief executive of Victorian Rail Tack (VicTrack), level 8, 1010 La Trobe Street, Docklands. I commenced in that position in September 2007. I attend before the select committee on behalf of VicTrack. VicTrack is a statutory corporation established under and governed by the Rail Corporations Act 1996 and is subject to joint directions of the Minister for Public Transport and of the Treasurer. VicTrack reports to the Minister for Public Transport and the Treasurer through an independent board. I have received a letter from the Minister for Public Transport, dated 29 January 2008, which attached a letter from the Attorney-General to the minister of the same date. The Attorney-General’s letter enclosed correspondence with the select committee regarding the executive government’s position on the scope of the terms of reference of the select committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Flyer 2014 09.Cdr
    Blank page THE BURRA FLYER Events and Happenings Free An Initiative of Korumburra Community Development and Action Inc Vol 11 Issue 4 ISSN 1449-6062 FREE PUBLICATION September-November 2014 The Coal Creek Steam Train is back South America Farming Tour 8 - 26 September, 2015 Fully escorted including visits to 3 local farms in 3 countries. Small group 14-20 passengers. ex Melbourne $9,979.00 per person twinshare including airfares and taxes. Experience the best of South America ... the majestic Andes, Buenos Aires, Iguazu Falls, Rio de Janeiro - with add-ons available to mysterious Machu Picchu & Lake Titicaca and/or Galapagos Islands and more! Please enquire! Request full tour dossier from [email protected] phone 5655 2655 GippslandGippsland GlobalGlobal PTY. LTD Page 2 The Burra Flyer CONTENTS Access Centre . 26 National Servicemen. 11 Advertisers. 37 Open Gardens (Jumbunna) . 12, 13, 28 Book Launch . 34 Operation Christmas Child . 34, 35 Buskers' Festival . 39 Opportunity Shops . 30 Calendar . 38 Orchid Club . 9 Carinya Lodge Aux. 11 Pirates' Day (Coal Creek) . 8 Churches. 24, 25 Poowong activities . 37 Citizens Advice Bureau . 29, 36 Poowong Pickers Festival. 37 Consumer Affairs . 10 Primary School (KPS) . 22 Craft Group . 29 Probus (Coal Creek) . 5 Cricket Club. 18 Probus (Korumburra). 11 Croquet Club . 23 Prom Country Cheese . 22, 23 Farmers' Market (Coal Creek) . 16, 20 Rose Show (Leongatha) . 15, 36 Friends of Coal Creek. 32 Rotary Club . 6, 7 & 9 Historical Society . 10, 36 Round Table . 17 Horticultural Society . 5 St. Joseph's Primary School . 8 Jumbunna Bush Market. 12 Scouts . 14, 15 K.C.D.A.
    [Show full text]
  • I I I I I I I I I I I
    Department of Planning & Development I. Department of Housing and Regional Development I MELBOURNE METRO PO LITAN STRATEGY I STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEVIELOPMiENT I PROJECTS & PROGRAMS · I FINAL REPORT APPENDICES SOUTH EAST REGION I I I I I I I I I I I I SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I N I E I R in association with I Spiller Gibbins Swan Pty Ltd Travers Morgan Pty Ltd I Loder & Bayly Consulting Group I October 1995 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Department of Planning & Development .I Department of Housing and Regional Developm_ent . ; •• J MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN STRATEGY STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE .. I INFRASTRUCTURE LIBRARY l . DEVELOPMENT \\\i\~~~~~~~~li!~~~\11] PROJECTS & PROGRAMS ·.I ~ ~-~~ -----~---- FINAL REPORT APPENDICES I SOUTH .EAST REGION I .. ·Ii I I Transport Library I· ·I· I I ~ ·I - - - - - -- --- -- --- 711. 4099 00105983 451 MEL:M M lb t . 1 l ·I (1 995) e ourne me r~po 1tan i strategy : strateg1c v. 2 copy 2 infrastructure development projects and program~. l I South East Region : final 1 -~~---~---~~~~--~ . ~- - ) 1- SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ I N I E I R in association with .1 Spiller Gibbins Swan Pty_ Ltd . :J Travers Morgan Pty Ltd :I Loder & Bayly Consulting Group ·. ! . • J I October 1995 ..r l I LIST OF APPENDICES I Appendix A- National, State .. and Metropolitan Policies I· Appendix B - Policies of Regional Organisations - Appendix C - Policies of Local Government I Appendix D - Strategic Objectives of Service Providers I Appendix E -:- Detailed Description of Region Appendix F - Industry and Business Interviews I .
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Impact Assessment
    EPBC Act referral - Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Significant Impact Assessment Ramsar sites Western Port Ramsar wetland The project is not considered likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of the Western Port Ramsar site for the following reasons: Horizontal directional drilling (HDD) will be employed from approximately KP3.9 to KP4.4 and KP18.6 to KP19.5 so that surface disturbance of the Western Port Ramsar site is entirely avoided. As such there is no plausible risk that the project will cause areas of the wetland to be destroyed or substantially modified. No substantial and measurable change to the hydrological regime of the Western Port Ramsar site is expected to occur as a result of the project. The movement of water through the Western Port Ramsar site is dominated by semi-diurnal tides, and neither evaporation nor freshwater inputs are sufficient to affect flushing or to generate strong or persistent estuarine circulation patterns (Lee 2011). There is no plausible risk that the project will cause a substantial or measurable change to tidal patterns which dominate the hydrological regime of the Western Port Ramsar site. The project is considered unlikely to seriously affect the habitat or lifecycle of native species, including invertebrate fauna and fish species, dependent upon the Western Port Ramsar site. The ecological character description addendum for the Western Port Ramsar site (Hale 2016) identifies six species of waterbirds for which the wetland regularly supports greater than 1% of the global population. These species, which are listed below, are comprised of three non-breeding spring-summer visiting shorebirds, an oystercatcher, a tern and a gull.
    [Show full text]
  • Cardinia Shire Council 170.30 Kb
    Inquiry into Growing the Suburbs Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne Submission by Cardinia Shire Council January 2012 Inquiry into Growing the Suburbs Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne Submission by Cardinia Shire Council – January 2012 1. Introduction The Cardinia Shire Council welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the Inquiry into Growing the Suburbs - Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne being conducted by the Outer Suburban Interface Services and Development Committee. Council is an interface municipality experiencing rapid population growth as a result of the expansion of metropolitan Melbourne, and the delivery of infrastructure and provision of local business development and employment are critical to achieving sustainable growth. 2. About the Cardinia Shire The Cardinia Shire is an interface municipality located to the south east of Melbourne. The Cardinia Shire has an area of 1280 square kilometres, approximately 10% of which is located within the metropolitan urban growth boundary between Beaconsfield and Pakenham. There are 27 rural townships and communities located outside the urban growth boundary. 1 Inquiry into Growing the Suburbs Infrastructure and Business Development in Outer Suburban Melbourne Submission by Cardinia Shire Council – January 2012 The population in the Cardinia Shire is forecast to grow from a current population of 76,000 people to 152,000 in 2030 as shown in the following graph. The Casey Cardinia Region comprising the City of Casey and Shire of Cardinia is forecast to grow from a current population of approximately 320,000 people to approximately 550,000 people by 2030 which will create significant demands for infrastructure and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Branchline Society the Members Newsletter of the Castlemaine and Maldon Railway May 2014 Preservation Society
    Castlemaine and Maldon Railway Preservation Branchline Society The Members Newsletter of the Castlemaine and Maldon Railway May 2014 Preservation Society Thank You to the Victorian State Government The Hon. Damian Drum MP enjoys the company of VGR volunteers and staff at the announcement of the grant for the Takeuchi hi-rail gear. The Victorian Goldfields Railway in Maldon will upgrade its track-layer and sleeper-replacement machine with the help of $50,400 from the Victorian Coalition Government’s $1 billion Regional Growth Fund. Member for Northern Victoria, Damian Drum MLC, pictured above with a group of VGR volunteers, said the machine would be able to operate on all railway gauges currently in use in Australia. “The Victorian Goldfields Railway has identified an opportunity to create a unique work team to operate the only Takeuchi Hi-Rail track machine in Victoria,” Mr Drum said. “The VGR is experiencing an ageing volunteer workforce and the acquisition of specialist machinery will remove some of the burden from the volunteers. “As well as maintaining the VGR’s rail system into the future, the project will maintain two full-time jobs and generate income for the VGR through contract work at various tourist railways, including the Maldon Castlemaine tourist railway and tracks like Puffing Billy, Mornington Railway and Southern Shorthaul Railroad. “The machine will be designed and built in Bendigo by engineering company McCullochs.” Deputy Premier and Minister for Regional and Rural Development Peter Ryan said the Coalition Government funding towards the $67,200 project to upgrade the Takeuchi Track Layer would be provided through the Regional Growth Fund to the Victorian Goldfields Railway, which will contribute $16,800.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions Without Notice Privatisation Of
    QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE Tuesday, 5 May 1992 ASSEMBLY 1139 Tuesday, 5 May 1992 to listen, that the opposition is on about privatisation and corporatisation as a means to privatisation. Over the next few months I shall be pleased to have the debate on what we believe should happen about The SPEAKER (Hon. Ken Coghill) took the chair at the reform of our public sector agencies. Quite 2.5 p.m. and read the prayer. clearly the view of the opposition is that corporatisation is a lock step to privatisation, and in fact it wants privatisation only to meet those ends. I QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE have read the document carefully, and the opposition sees corporatisation as a lock step to privatisation and considers that it is not worth PRIVATISATION OF GOVERNMENT having unless it is a lock step to privatisation. UTILITIES Mr Kennett interjected. Mr KENNElT (Leader of the Opposition) - I Ms KIRNER - I know the honourable member ask the Premier: is it not a fact that you and the government today scrapped -- for Brighton had to go to the London School of Economics to actually get this privatisation document written, and I know you are upset that at The SPEAKER - Order! The honourable thelast-- member should address the Chair and not address the Premier directly. Mr Kennett interjected. Mr KENNElT - Is it not a fact that the Premier Ms KIRNER - I wonder who is getting upset and the government have today scrapped now! corporatisation and privatisation plans as a result of threats made by the Victorian trade union Honourable members interjecting.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna Assessment Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project
    APA Transmission Pty Limited Flora and Fauna Assessment Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project 10 September 2018 31- 02984.01 DOCUMENTATION CONTROL MONARC ENVIRONMENTAL Report Title: Flora and Fauna Assessment – Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project Volume: 1 of 1 Author: Monarc Environmental Client: APA Transmission Pty Ltd Document Number: 31-02984.01 Version Number: Final Document Reference: 31-02984.00 Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project DOCUMENT APPROVALS TITLE NAME SIGNATURE DATE Senior Environmental Consultant Colin Clay Prepared Senior Zoologist John Harris 27 Aug 2018 Senior Environmental Scientist Mark Vergara Senior Environmental Scientist Mark Vergara Revised 10 Sept 2018 Principal Environmental Scientist Dr. Bram Mason Approved Principal Environmental Scientist Dr. Bram Mason 10 Sept 2018 DISTRIBUTION RECORD VERSION NO. COPY NO. HOLDER DATE Draft v2 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 03 08 2018 Draft v3 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 21 08 2018 Draft v4 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 28 08 2018 Draft v5 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 04 09 2018 Final 1 APA Transmission Pty Ltd 10 09 2018 31-02984.00 APA Transmission Pty Limited Page | ii Flora and Fauna Assessment for the Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Background APA Transmission Pty Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the APA Group (together referred to as APA) is proposing to construct and operate a high pressure gas pipeline which will connect AGL’s proposed Gas Import Jetty at Crib Point to the Victorian Transmission System (VTS), near Pakenham. Upon completion, APA transmission pipeline and AGL’s Gas Import Jetty will increase energy security and supply stability to Victoria.
    [Show full text]