Casey Planning Scheme Amendment C119

Casey Planning Scheme Amendment C119

Planning and Environment Act 1987 CASEY PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C119 CRANBOURNE EAST PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS Report of a Panel Pursuant to Sections 96B, 153 and 155 of the Act Panel: Kathryn Mitchell, Chair Rodger Eade Des Grogan 25 February 2010 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 CASEY PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C119 CRANBOURNE EAST PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS Report of a Panel Pursuant to Sections 96B, 153 and 155 of the Act Kathryn Mitchell, Chair Rodger Eade, Member Des Grogan, Member 25 February 2010 Page 2 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................6 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................9 2. CRANBOURNE EAST PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN..................................12 2.1 THE PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN .............................................................................12 2.2 THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN .............................................................15 2.3 THE PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS....................................................................16 2.4 OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE AMENDMENT ..................................................................18 2.5 THE AMENDMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF PLANNING POLICY ....................................19 2.6 THE VISION FOR CRANBOURNE EAST........................................................................22 2.7 THE PANEL’S APPROACH TO RESOLVING ISSUES......................................................22 3. CASEY NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRE...........................................24 3.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................24 3.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................26 3.3 SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE ....................................................................................27 3.4 PANEL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................33 4. CASEY FIELDS BOULEVARD ...............................................................................37 4.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................37 4.2 DENNIS FAMILY CORPORATION ................................................................................38 4.3 DEVINE .......................................................................................................................40 4.4 RD 11 INTERSECTION.................................................................................................44 4.5 PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................47 5. OTHER TRAFFIC AND ACCESS ISSUES...........................................................49 5.1 ACCESS FROM PEET LAND TO SOUTH GIPPSLAND HIGHWAY ..................................49 5.2 VILLAWOOD ‐ CLYDE FIVE WAYS ROAD ...................................................................50 5.3 D SPEC AND R SPEC ................................................................................................52 6. DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN.......................................................53 6.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................53 6.2 PRINCIPLES UNDERPINNING THE DCP .....................................................................54 6.3 THE TEMPLATE APPROACH TO DCP TREATMENT OF INTERSECTIONS ....................56 6.4 FUNDING WORKS IN LIEU..........................................................................................57 6.5 SINGLE OR TWO CHARGE AREAS ..............................................................................59 Page 3 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 6.6 CONTINGENCIES.........................................................................................................63 6.7 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ....................................................................................67 6.8 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE.................................................................................69 6.9 PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................71 7. ROMAN CATHOLIC TRUST.................................................................................72 7.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................72 7.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................72 7.3 SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE ....................................................................................73 7.4 PANEL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................77 8. NORTHERN PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ....................................................................83 8.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................83 8.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................84 8.3 SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE ....................................................................................84 8.4 PANEL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................86 9. BLUE HILLS................................................................................................................88 9.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................88 9.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................89 9.3 SUBMISSIONS ..............................................................................................................90 9.4 PANEL FINDINGS........................................................................................................93 10. COLLISON ESTATE .................................................................................................94 10.1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................94 10.2 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? .............................................................................................94 10.3 SUBMISSIONS ..............................................................................................................95 10.4 PANEL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................96 11. OTHER ISSUES .........................................................................................................98 11.1 WARREN LAND ..........................................................................................................98 11.2 KEYS LAND...............................................................................................................100 11.3 CHRISTOFOROU LAND .............................................................................................103 11.4 WEBB LAND..............................................................................................................103 11.5 OAKBEE ....................................................................................................................103 11.6 CULTURAL HERITAGE ..............................................................................................106 11.7 OTHER PRECINCT STRUCTURE PLAN ISSUES ...........................................................107 Page 4 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of the Panel: 25 February 2010 12. PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS..........................................................112 12.1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................112 12.2 P914/08 ‐ SOFRA.......................................................................................................112 12.3 P915/08 ‐ GEO PROPERTIES.....................................................................................112 12.4 P917/08 ‐ DEVINE.....................................................................................................113 12.5 P918/08 – CLARKSON DEVELOPMENTS ...................................................................114 12.6 P919/08 ‐ STOCKLAND .............................................................................................115 12.7 P920/08 – VILLAWOOD PROPERTIES........................................................................115 12.8 P921/08 ‐ MARVELLI ................................................................................................116 12. PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................116 13. PANEL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............................117 APPENDICES 1. List of Submittors 2. Revised Permit Conditions 3. Document List Page 5 Casey Planning Scheme Cranbourne East Precinct Structure Plan Report of

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    231 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us