The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland in the Context of Constitutional Judiciary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland in the Context of Constitutional Judiciary BIAŁYSTOK LAW BOOKS BLB 11 To my Parents and Brothers Lech Jamróz THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRIBUNAL IN POLAND IN THE CONTEXT OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIARY Białystok 2014 Editor in Chief of Publishing House Temida 2: Cezary Kosikowski Chief: Emil W. Pływaczewski Scientifi c Board: Members from University of Bialystok: Stanisław Bożyk, Adam Czarnota, Leonard Etel, Ewa M. Guzik-Makaruk, Adam Jamróz, Dariusz Kijowski, Cezary Kulesza, Agnieszka Malare- wicz-Jakubów, Maciej Perkowski, Stanisław Prutis, Eugeniusz Ruśkowski, Walerian Sanetra, Joanna Sieńczyło-Chlabicz, Ryszard Skarzyński, Halina Święczkowska, Mieczysława Zdanowicz National Members: Marian Filar (Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń), Edward Gniewek (University of Wrocław), Lech Paprzycki (Supreme Court) Foreign Members: Lidia Abramczyk (Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, Belarus), Vladimir Babčak (University in Kosice, Slovakia), Renata Almeida da Costa (La Salle University, Brasil), Chris Eskridge (University of Nebrasca, USA), Jose Luis Iriarte Angél (University of Navarra, Spain), Marina Karasjewa (Voronezh State University, Russia), Aleksiej S. Kartsov (Fed- eral Constitutional Tribunal in Sankt Petersburg, Russia), Bernhard Kitous (University of Rennes, France), Jolanta Kren Kostkiewicz (University of Bern, Switzerland), Martin Krygier (University of New South Wales, Australia), Anthony Minnaar (University of South Africa, Republic of South Africa), Antonello Miranda (University in Palermo, Italy), Petr Mrkyvka ( Masaryk Universi- ty, Czech), Marcel Alexander Niggli (University of Fribourg, Switzerland ) Andrei A. Novikov (Saint Petersburg State University Russia), Sławomir Redo (Univerity of Vienna, Austria), Jerzy Sarnecki (Stokholm University, Sweden), Bernd Schünemann (University of Munich, Germany), Kevin Saunders (Michigan State University, USA), Sebastiano Tafaro (University of Bari, Italy), Wiktor Trinczuk (Kyiv University of Tourism, Economics and Law, Ukraine), Keiichi Yamanaka (Kansai Univesrity, Japan). Editor-in-Chief: Jerzy Banasiuk Cover design: Jerzy Banasiuk Publisher: Temida 2, Faculty of Law, University of Białystok Series Editor: Izabela Kraśnicka Reviewer: prof. Marian Grzybowski Copyright © 2014 by Temida 2, Poland. All rights reserved. Printed in Poland. This publication is protected by Copyright and permission should be obtained from the publisher prior to any repro- duction, sortage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, me- chanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. Publication fi nanced within the project – fund of Research of Young Scientists BMN No. 537(2012) ISBN: 978–83–62813–72–8 ISSN: 2083–9790 Temida 2, Mickiewicza 1, 15–213 Białystok, POLAND Tel.: (+48) 85 7457168 • Fax: (+48) 85 7406089 [email protected] www.temida2.pl Table of contents Explanation of abbreviations ................................................................7 Introduction ...........................................................................................9 Chapter I The Constitutional Tribunal as an Authority for Protection of the Constitution and Individual Rigths 1. The genesis of constitutional court. Legitimacy of constitutional tribunals in a democratic state ........................................................11 2. Models of constitutional court ........................................................21 Chapter II The Constitutional Position of the Constitutional Tribunal 1. The origins and evolution of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland ..........................................................................33 2. The Constitutional Tribunal in the Constitution of 1997 ................41 3. Organization of the Constitutional Tribunal ...................................49 3.1. Composition .............................................................................49 3.2. Status of Tribunal judges .........................................................52 3.3. Bodies of the Constitutional Tribunal ......................................55 3.4. The Offi ce of the Constitutional Tribunal ................................57 Chapter III Examination Procedure of Hierarchical Conformity of Legal Regulations (norms) 1. Rules of procedure ..........................................................................61 1.1. The principle of disposition .....................................................62 1.2. The principle falsa demonstration non nocet ..........................63 5 1.3. The principle of the burden of proof ........................................65 1.4. The adversarial principle .........................................................66 1.5. The principle of single-instance ...............................................68 1.6. The principle of collegiality .....................................................68 1.7. The principle of transparency ..................................................70 2. Appropriate application of the Code of Civil Procedure ................70 3. Types of proceedings ......................................................................73 3.1. Adjudicating on constitutionality and legality of legal norms ..........................................................................75 3.1.1. Application ........................................................................75 3.1.2. Constitutional complaint ....................................................81 3.1.3. Legal question (question of law) .......................................99 4. Stages of proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal ............104 4.1. Preliminary proceedings ........................................................105 4.2. Examination proceedings (at the hearing) .............................110 4.3. Adjudicating...........................................................................116 Chapter IV Specifi c Proceedings 1. Adjudication on the constitutionality of purposes and activities of political parties .........................................................................124 2. Resolving competence (power) disputes between central constitutional state authorities ......................................................132 3. The remaining functions of the Constitutional Tribunal: adjudicating on a temporary incapability of the President to hold the offi ce and a signaling function ....................................138 Concluding observations ...................................................................141 Bibliography .....................................................................................149 Appendices ........................................................................................159 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CCP - Code of Civil Procedure CCrP - Code of Criminal Procedure CT, the Tribunal - the Constitutional Tribunal Dz.U. - Dziennik Ustaw [Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland] EU - the European Union General - the General Assembly of the Judges Assembly, of the Constitutional Tribunal Assembly l.g.u. - local government unit M.P. - Monitor Polski, Offi cial Journal of the Republic of Poland NCJ - National Council of Judiciary Offi ce - the Offi ce of the Constitutional Tribunal OTK - Orzecznictwo Trybunału Konstytucyjnego [Adjudication (Rulings) of the Constitutional Tribunal] OTK ZU - Orzecznictwo Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Zbiór Urzędowy [Adjudication (Rulings) of the Constitutional Tribunal. Offi cial Collection] Procedural - the Procedural Rules of the Constitutional rules, the Tribunal of 3 October 2006 Procedural Rules of CT PPR - the Polish People’s Republic PUWP - the Polish United Workers’ Party RP - the Republic of Poland SAC - the Supreme Administrative Court Statute - the Statute of the Offi ce of the Constitutional Tribunal 7 the Act, the Act - the Act on the Constitutional Tribunal on CT the - the Constitution of the Republic of Poland Constitution, of 2 April 1997 the Constitution of RP USSR - the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics INTRODUCTION Experts on constitutional law have been analyzing the issues of constitutional judicial system for many years. Also in Poland a great number of excellent academic works in this fi eld have been published. They were both monographs and specifi c papers (articles, studies, glosses, etc.) and were devoted to constitutional judiciary and the Constitutional Tribunal. A considerable number of legal comparative and monographic papers have been published, where the functions and activities of constitutional courts in European countries were discussed. It is not surprising since the existence of a body (bodies) controlling the constitutionality of the provisions of law is an indispensable element of a modern democratic rule of law. Also the judicial practice of the constitutional court is very inspiring. Not only is its substantive activity (solving the questions of the constitutionality of regulations) interesting, but its procedural aspects as well. This monograph, The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland in The Context of Constitutional Judiciary was prepared in the English language, for it is possible to notice a considerable disproportion in the number of academic publications in Polish on the Constitutional Tribunal and constitutional judiciary (there are plenty of them), and publications in foreign languages (they are far less numerous). Moreover, publication in English increases the potential number of readers and helps the users of this language collect necessary information on Polish constitutional institutions. This paper is addressed to a wide group of readers; to all who study
Recommended publications
  • Polish Constitutional Tribunal Judgments with “Deferral Clause” and Their Application by Polish Courts
    Contents lists available at Vilnius University Press Teisė ISSN 1392-1274 eISSN 2424-6050 2020, vol. 115, pp. 122–133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2019.115.8 Teisės aktualijos / Problems of Law Polish Constitutional Tribunal Judgments with “Deferral Clause” and Their Application by Polish Courts Angelika Ciżyńska-Pałosz ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4947-5771 Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration PhD Candidate, Department of Constitutional Law Bracka 12, 31-005 Krakow, Poland Tel. (+48) 12 663 19 78 Email: <[email protected]> The main aim of this paper1 is to present the specificity of functioning of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, the charac- teristics of one type of its judgments, i.e. verdicts with a “deferral clause” and preparation of the de lege lata and de lege ferenda postulates. Problems analyzed in this work remain valid in both jurisprudence and legal doctrine. Keywords: Polish Constitutional Tribunal, judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal, execution of judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal, constitutional law, judiciary. Lenkijos Konstitucinio teismo nutarimai su atidėjimo nuostata ir jų taikymas Lenkijos teismuose Pagrindinis šio straipsnio tikslas yra Lenkijos Konstitucinio teismo ypatumų bei vienos šios institucijos nutarimų rūšies, t. y. nutarimų su atidėjimo nuostata, būdingų savybių pristatymas ir de lege lata bei de lege ferenda postulatų rengimas. Šiame straipsnyje analizuojami klausimai yra aktualūs tiek teismų praktikai, tiek teisės doktrinai. Pagrindiniai žodžiai: Lenkijos Konstitucinis teismas, Konstitucinio teismo nutarimai, Konstitucinio teismo nutarimų vykdymas, konstitucinė teisė, teismo institucijos. Introduction The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland (thereinafter “the CT”), alongside the State Tribunal and courts, is a part of judicial authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Piano-Teaching-Legacy-Of-Solomon-Mikowsky.Pdf
    ! " #$ % $%& $ '()*) & + & ! ! ' ,'* - .& " ' + ! / 0 # 1 2 3 0 ! 1 2 45 3 678 9 , :$, /; !! < <4 $ ! !! 6=>= < # * - / $ ? ?; ! " # $ !% ! & $ ' ' ($ ' # % %) %* % ' $ ' + " % & ' !# $, ( $ - . ! "- ( % . % % % % $ $ $ - - - - // $$$ 0 1"1"#23." 4& )*5/ +) * !6 !& 7!8%779:9& % ) - 2 ; ! * & < "-$=/-%# & # % %:>9? /- @:>9A4& )*5/ +) "3 " & :>9A 1 The Piano Teaching Legacy of Solomon Mikowsky by Kookhee Hong New York City, NY 2013 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface by Koohe Hong .......................................................3 Endorsements .......................................................................3 Comments ............................................................................5 Part I: Biography ................................................................12 Part II: Pedagogy................................................................71 Part III: Appendices .........................................................148 1. Student Tributes ....................................................149 2. Student Statements ................................................176
    [Show full text]
  • Eurozone Enlargement in Times of Crisis: Challenges for the V4 Countries
    EUROZONE ENLARGEMENT IN TIMES OF CRISIS: CHALLENGES FOR THE V4 COUNTRIES Edited by Agata Gostyńska, Paweł Tokarski, Patryk Toporowski, Damian Wnukowski Warsaw 2014 © Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, 2014 Editor Brien Barnett Technical editor and cover designer Dorota Dołęgowska The RASTANEWS project is funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme (SSH.2012.1.3-1) The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013] under the grant agreement no. 320278 Scientific research financed from funds for science in 2013–2016 for an international co-financed project ISBN 978-83-62453-69-6 (pb) ISBN 978-83-62453-80-1 (epub) ISBN 978-83-62453-81-8 (mobi) ISBN 978-83-62453-82-5 (pdf) Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych ul. Warecka 1a, 00-950 Warszawa phone (+48) 22 556 80 00, fax (+48) 22 556 80 99 [email protected], www.pism.pl Printed by: RYKO, ul. Piłsudskiego 17, 05-480 Karczew CONTENTS Introduction . 5 Part I: Eurozone Crisis: Selected Issues Ognian Hishow Overcoming the Intra-European Imbalance: How Much Would Germany Have to Adjust? . 11 Anna Visvizi Greece: Eurozone’s Weak Link . 19 Zoltán Gál Role of Financial Sector FDI in Regional Imbalances in Central and Eastern Europe. 27 Part II: Eurozone Enlargement: Economic and Political Challenges for V4 Countries Ettore Dorrucci Enlarging the Euro Area: Four Lessons for CEE Countries . .39 Patryk Toporowski The Impact of Monetary Integration on Trade within the Euro Area: The Evidence, Revisited . .49 Julius Horvath Political Economy of Accession to the Euro: The Case of Hungary .
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Report
    Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators 2009 Poland report SGI 2009 | 2 Poland report Executive summary The parliamentary elections in September 2005 changed the political landscape of Poland once again. Fed up with the scandals and corruption of the post- communist Democratic Left Alliance (SLD), voters made the conservative party Freedom and Justice (PiS) with its leading figures, Lech Kaczyński and Jarosław Kaczyński, the biggest party in government. The PiS initially formed a minority government backed by the rightist League of Polish Families (LPR) and the populist agrarian party Samoobrona. In May 2006, the three parties formed a coalition government, which broke apart after fierce internal struggles in August 2007. The break-up of the coalition led to early elections, the result of which in October 2007 was the PiS being voted out of office. The PiS government had an ambitious program with a strong anti-communist and anti-liberal tenor. Emphasizing the need for a clear break with the past and a determination to fight against communist and post-communist networks, it called for the founding of a “fourth republic” characterized by a strong state, a more resolute fight for Poland’s national interests and a ”unified Poland.” The rhetoric, politics and policies of the PiS government contributed to the strong political polarization inside the country and to Poland’s isolation within the European Union. In its attempt to break with the past, the PiS government infringed upon civil rights and the separation of government powers. It increased government control over the public media, intervened in the judiciary, launched a radical lustration law (partly scrapped by the Constitutional Court in May 2007), dissolved the Agency for Gender Equality and manipulated the fight against corruption for political means.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispute Over the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland and Its Impact on the Protection of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms1
    International Comparative Jurisprudence 2017 Volume 3 Issue 2 ISSN 2351-6674 (online) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2017.12.003 THE DISPUTE OVER THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRIBUNAL IN POLAND AND ITS IMPACT ON THE PROTECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS1 Anna Rytel-Warzocha University of Gdańsk, Poland E-mail: [email protected] Received 30 December 2016; accepted 8 July 2017 Abstract. The article is devoted to the conflict over the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland that started in late 2015 and turned into a constitutional crisis in 2016. The article presents the causes and main aspects of the conflict, focusing on the government’s refusal to publish the verdict of the Constitutional Tribunal and the consequences thereof for the effectiveness of the protection of constitutional rights. Keywords: Constitutional Tribunal, constitutional complaint, judicial review, constitutional crises, human rights Introduction It is the standard in a democratic state ruled by law that the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens and humans in general are set forth in the constitution as the supreme legislative act in the state. However, it is not the catalogue itself that is particularly important, but rather – the mechanisms that secure these rights and freedoms and allow for their effective implementation. One such institution in the Polish constitutional system is the Constitutional Tribunal, which possesses the competence to review constitutional complaints as well as to conduct abstract constitutional review of legal provisions concerning the rights and freedoms of citizens. The Constitutional Tribunal was first established within the constitutional system of Poland in 1982 by an amendment to the Constitution of the Polish People’s Republic of 1952.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissolution of the Parliament According to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland
    Katarzyna Dunaj University of Humanities and Sciences in Siedlce, Poland DISSOLUTION OF THE PARLIAMENT ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND Abstract Dissolution of the parliament is a characteristic feature of parliamentary system of government. The Constitution of the Republic of Poland has adopted a rationalized parliamentary system of government, inter alia the constructive vote of no confidence, modeled on the German Basic Law. For this reason the president can dissolve the House of Representatives ( Sejm ) only in two situations: in the event that a vote of confidence has not been granted to the Council of Ministers pursuant to Article 155 Paragraph 1 or if, after 4 months from the day of submission of a draft Budget to the Sejm, it has not been adopted or presented to the president for signature (Article 225). Furthermore the Sejm may shorten its term of office by a resolution passed by a majority of at least two-thirds of the votes of the statutory number of Deputies (Article 98, Paragraph 3). Key words: dissolution of the parliament, Constitution of the Republic of Poland, president . Dissolution of parliament is an inherent feature of the parliamentary system of government. In the event of a cabinet crisis (a vote of no-confidence passed by the parliament towards the government) a normal means of its removal is dissolution of the parliament and selecting by means of elections a new government majority. Therefore, this institution is common in the constitutions of European states i. However, it is not known by the United States Constitution of 1787, which adopted a presidential system of government, characterized by, among others the lack of the equivalent of the Council of Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland by Piotr Arak, Piotr Żakowiecki
    Poland by Piotr Arak, Piotr Żakowiecki Capital: Warsaw Population: 38 million GNI/capita, PPP: $23,930 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 National Democratic 3.25 3.50 3.25 3.25 2.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 Governance Electoral Process 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.50 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Independent Media 2.25 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 Local Democratic 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 Governance Judicial Framework 2.25 2.50 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 and Independence Corruption 3.00 3.00 2.75 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 Democracy Score 2.36 2.39 2.25 2.32 2.21 2.14 2.18 2.18 2.21 2.32 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Legislation During the Pandemic Vs. Corruption Anti-Crisis Shields: Completing the Law and Justice State Project?
    Polish Legislation during the Pandemic vs. Corruption Anti-crisis Shields: Completing the Law and Justice State Project? Grzegorz Makowski, Marcin Waszak All crises – economic, health, military or other – not only create inherent problems but often spawn indirect threats, too. Corruption is usually one such indirect, yet serious, factor that will aggravate a crisis. It tends to accompany less prosperous spells, as people concentrate on the more burning issue of saving their lives or assets, or trying to recover. People are less attentive to standards and pro- cedures, and less prone to be financially transparent or accountable. Moreover, crises require rapid, tough decisions. Policies and procedures tailored to normality may be seen like a burden. While laws and procedures lack relevance during of crisis, discretionary behaviour finds an easy way in, which is always a major factor breeding corruption, as Robert Klitgaard rightly pointed out. Corruption is a complex phenomenon. For once, it fits the classic Klitgaard ‘equation’: Corruption = 1 Monopoly of Power + Discretion – Accountability. Accountability is not plausible without transparen- Stefan Batory Foundation cy, which will be fundamental to our analysis later in this paper. Yet the nature of corruption may be better captured in terms of particularism, when relatively narrow groups (a political party, an interest group or a particular social group) are capable of controlling various public, business and other insti- tutions whose resources should, in principle, be accessible based
    [Show full text]
  • USHMM Finding
    http://collections.ushmm.org Contact [email protected] for further information about this collection MARIAN FILAR [1-1-1] THIS IS AN INTERVIEW WITH: MF - Marian Filar [interviewee] EM - Edith Millman [interviewer] Interview Dates: September 5, and November 16, 1994, June 16, 1995 Tape one, side one: EM: This is Edith Millman interviewing Professor Marian Filar. Today is Septem- ber 5, 1994. We are interviewing in Philadelphia. Professor Filar, would you tell me where you were born and when, and a little bit about your family? MF: Well, I was born in Warsaw, Poland, before the Second World War. My father was a businessman. He actually wanted to be a lawyer, and he made the exam on the university, but he wasn’t accepted, but he did get an A, but he wasn’t accepted. EM: Could you tell me how large your family was? MF: You mean my general, just my immediate family? EM: Yeah, your immediate family. How many siblings? MF: We were seven children. I was the youngest. I had four brothers and two sis- ters. Most of them played an instrument. My oldest brother played a violin, the next to him played the piano. My sister Helen was my first piano teacher. My sister Lucy also played the piano. My brother Yaacov played a violin. So there was a lot of music there. EM: I just want to interject that Professor Filar is a known pianist. Mr.... MF: Concert pianist. EM: Concert pianist. Professor Filar, could you tell me what your life was like in Warsaw before the war? MF: Well, it was fine.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Country Report BTI 2018
    BTI 2018 Country Report Poland This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — Poland. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2018 | Poland 3 Key Indicators Population M 37.9 HDI 0.855 GDP p.c., PPP $ 27811 Pop. growth1 % p.a. -0.1 HDI rank of 188 36 Gini Index 32.1 Life expectancy years 78.2 UN Education Index 0.876 Poverty3 % 0.3 Urban population % 60.5 Gender inequality2 0.137 Aid per capita $ - Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary Poland experienced relatively calm years from the time of the 2005 elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourteenth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal
    Fourteenth 29 January 2021 United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and English only Criminal Justice Kyoto, Japan, 7–12 March 2021 Item 5 of the provisional agenda* Multidimensional approaches by Governments to promoting the rule of law by, inter alia, providing access to justice for all; building effective, accountable, impartial and inclusive institutions; and considering social, educational and other relevant measures, including fostering a culture of lawfulness while respecting cultural identities, in line with the Doha Declaration ** Background documents received from individual experts Białystok Legal Studies Prepared by Sławomir Redo __________________ * A/CONF.234/1/Rev.1. ** The designations employed, the presentation of material and the views expressed in the paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat and do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. V.21-00585 (E) *2100585* UNIWERSYTET W BIAŁYMSTOKU WYDZIAŁ PRAWA BIAŁOSTOCKIE STUDIA PRAWNICZE BIAŁYSTOK 2018 VOLUME 23 nr 3 Advancing Culture of Lawfulness: Towards the Achievement of the 2030 Agenda BIAŁOSTOCKIE STUDIA PRAWNICZE VOLUME 23 nr 3 Editor-in-Chief of the Publisher Wydawnictwo Temida 2: Cezary Kosikowski Chair of the Advisory Board of the Publisher Wydawnictwo Temida 2: Emil W. Pływaczewski Advisory Board: Representatives of the University of Białystok: Stanisław Bożyk, Leonard Etel, Ewa M. Guzik-Makaruk, Adam Jamróz, Dariusz Kijowski, Cezary Kosikowski, Cezary Kulesza, Agnieszka Malarewicz-Jakubów, Maciej Perkowski, Stanisław Prutis, Eugeniusz Ruśkowski, Walerian Sanetra, Joanna Sieńczyło- Chlabicz, Ryszard Skarzyński, Halina Święczkowska, Jaroslav Volkonovski, Mieczysława Zdanowicz.
    [Show full text]
  • Beth Levin Inward Voice
    1838 — 1973 — 1828 Beth Levin Inward Voice Robert Schumann: Kreisleriana Anders Eliasson: Versione Franz Schubert: Piano Sonata in C minor D 958 LC 28016 Beth Levin / Inward Voice Studio Live Recording Robert Schumann (1810 — 56) Kreisleriana. Fantasien op. 16. Seinem Freunde Frédéric Chopin zugeeignet (1838) 1 32’ 38“ I Äußerst bewegt. II Sehr innig und nicht zu rasch * Intermezzo I. Sehr lebhaft - Erstes Tempo - Intermezzo II. Etwas bewegter - Langsamer (erstes Tempo) III Sehr aufgeregt * Etwas langsamer – Erstes Tempo – Noch schneller IV Sehr langsam * Bewegter – Erstes Tempo V Sehr lebhaft VI Sehr langsam * Etwas bewegter – Erstes Tempo VII Sehr rasch * Noch schneller – Etwas langsamer VIII Schnell und spielend Anders Eliasson (1947 — 2013) Versione per pianoforte (1973) 2 06’ 54“ Franz Peter Schubert (1797 — 1828) Sonate c-moll D 958 (1828) I Allegro 3 08’ 52“ II Adagio 4 12’ 37“ III Menuett. Allegro 5 03’ 10“ IV Allegro 6 10’ 17“ total 73’ 30“ Beth Levin In Beth Levins Spiel sind die Einflüsse Beth Levin fashions a uniquely transcen- mächtiger pianistischer und musikalisch- dent and personal style that combines four tow- kultureller Traditionen zu einem unver- ering pianistic, musical and cultural traditions. kennbar eigentümlichen Stil transzendiert: From her first great teacher, Marian Filar, Le- die polnische Schule kantabler klanglicher vin acquired the melodic and timbral refinement Verfeinerung ihres ersten großen Lehrers of the Polish school. Another early influence, Ru- Marian Filar; die strukturelle Klarheit und dolf Serkin, fostered a sense of structural clarity musikantische Natürlichkeit Rudolf Ser- and natural musicianship, while Leonard Shure kins; die monumentale Kraft und unwider- demonstrated his monumental force and irresis- stehliche Brillanz Leonard Shures; und die tible brilliance to his young student.
    [Show full text]