DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Stratigraphy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Stratigraphy PRACTICES cif ARCHAEOLOGICAL STRATIGRAPHY Edited by Edward C. Harris, Marley R. Brown III, and Gregory J. Brown This book aims to bring together a number of examples which illustrate the development and use of the Harris Matrix in describing and interpreting archaeological sites. This matrix, the theory of which is described in the two editions of Edward Harris' previous book, Principles oj Archaeolonical Stratinraphy, made possible for the first time a diagram­ matic representation of the stratigraphic sequence of a site, no matter how complex. The Harris Matrix, by showing in one diagram all three linear dimensions, plus time, represents a quantum leap over the older methods which relied on sample sections only. Here, seventeen essays present a sample of new work demonstrating the strengths and uses of the Harris Matrix, the first published collection of papers devoted solely to stratigraphy in archaeology. The crucial relationships between the Harris method, open­ area excavation techniques, the interpretation of interfaces, and the use of single-context plans and recording sheets is clarified by reference to specific sites, ranging from medieval Europe, through Mayan civilisations to Colonial Williamsburg in the USA. This book ,viII be of great value to all those involved in excavating and recording archaeological sites and should help to ensure that the maximum amount of stratigraphic information can be gathered from future investigations. ACADEMIC PRESS ISBN 0-12-326445-6 Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers LONDON • SAN DIEGO NEW YORK • BOSTON SYDNEY • TOKYO 9 780123 264459 > Practices of archaeological stratigraphy Edited by EDWARD C. HARRIS Bermuda Maritime Museum Mangrove Bay Bermuda MARLEY R. BROWN III and GREGORY J. BROWN Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Williamsburg Virginia USA ACADEMIC PRESS Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers London San Diego New York Boston Sydney Tokyo Toronto ACADEMIC PRESS LI MITED 24-28 Oval Road London NWl 70X Ullited Stales Edilioll published by ACADEMIC PRESS I NC. San Diego, CA 92101 Copyright © 1993 by ACADEMIC PRESS LIMITED except for C hapter 9, © Journal of Field Archaeology All rights reserved No part of thjs book may be reproduced in any form, photostat, microfilm, or by a ny other means, without written permission from the publishers This book is printed on acid-free paper A catalogue record for this book is avail able from the British Library ISBN 0-12-326445-6 Typeset by P & R Typesetters Ltd, Salisbury, Wiltsbire Prjnted and bound in Great Britain at tbe University Press, Cambridge Contributors B.A.P . Alvey, 63 Glencairn Road, London SW16 5DG, UK D.1. Bibby, Landesdenkmalamt Baden-Wurttemberg, Brauneggerstrasse 60, 7750 Konstanz, Germany G.]. Brown, Department of Archaeological Research, ColoJlial Williamsburg Foundation, P.O. Box 1776, Williamsburg, VA 23187-1776, USA M .R. Brown Ill, Department of Archaeological Research, Colonial W illiamsburg Foundation, P.O. Box 1776, Williamsburg, VA 23187-1776, USA P.R. Clark, Canterbury Archaeological Trust, 92a Broad Street, Canterbury, Kent, CTI 2LU, UK M. Davies, 40 Parliament St, Sandy Bay, Hobart, Tasmania 7005, Australia I.G. Trocoli, Catalan Society for Archaeology, C / Bailen, 125, entr. la ., 08014 Barcelona, Spain R.H. Gerrard, Registrar, Collections Management, Toronto Historical Board, Marine Museum, Exhibition Place, Toronto, Ontario M6K 3C3, Canada N. Hammond, Department of Archaeology, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA E.C. Harris, The Bermuda Maritime Museum, P.O. Box MA 273, Mangrove Bay MA BX, Bermuda I. Herzog, Rheinisches Amr fiir Bodendenkmalpflege, Colmanstrasse 14,5300 Bonn 1, Germany Z. Kobylillski, Institute for the History of Material Culture, Polish Academy of Sciences, Swierczewskiego 105, 01-240 Warsaw, Poland D.F. Muraca, Department of Archaeological Research, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, P.O. Box 1776, Williamsburg, VA 23187-1776, USA N. Pearson, York Archaeological Trust, 1 The Pavement, York Y01 2NA, UK A. Praetzellis, Anthropological Studies Center, Sonoma State University, 5503 Corbett Circle, Santa Rosa, CA 95403, USA D.M. Simmons, Research Department, O ld Sturbridge Village, 1 Old Sturbridge Village Road, Sturbridge, MA 01566-1198, USA C. Spence, Centre for Metropolitan History, Institute for Historical Research, University of London, 34 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK M.O. Stachiw, Research Department, Old Sturbridge Village, 1 Old Sturbridge Village Road, Sturbridge, MA 01566-1198, USA B.R . Stucki, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, 1810 Hinman Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201, USA ].R. Triggs, 247 Willow Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4E 3K6, Canada T. Williams, Canterbury Archaeological Trust, 92a Broad Street, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 2 LU, UK ].E. Worrell, Research Department, Old Sturbridge Village, 1 Old Sturbridge Village Road, Sturbridge, MA 01566-1198, USA Contents Foreword (Norman Hammond) Vll SECTION l. Introduction 1 1. Interfaces in archaeological stratigraphy (Marley R. Brown III and Edward C. Harris ) 7 SECTION II . Historical trends 21 2. Recording the archaeology of London: the development and implementation of the 23 DUA recording system (Craig Spence) 3. The contribution of the Harris Matrix to the development of Catalan archaeology 47 (Isabel G. Trocoli) 4. Polish medieval excavations and the Harris Matrix: applications and developments 57 (Zbigniew Kobylinski) 5. The limits of arbitrary excavation (Adrian Praetzellis) 68 SECTION Ill. Analysis in excavation 87 6. Single-coil text planlling: its role in on-site recording procedures and in post-excavation 89 analysis at York (Nicky Pearson and Tim Williams) 7. Building stratigraphic sequences 011 excavations: an example from Konstal1z, Germany 104 (David I. Bibby) 8. Three-dimensional assessment of activity areas in a shell midden: an example from the 122 Hoko River Rockshelter, State of Washington (Barbara Stucki) 9. Matrices and Maya archaeology (Norman Hammond) 139 SECTION IV. Phasing and structural analysis 153 10. Phasing stratigraphic sequences at Colonial Williamsburg (Gregory J. Brown and David 155 F. Muraca) 11. The application of the Harris Matrix to the recording of standing structures (Martin 167 Davies) 12. The total site matrix: strata and structure at the Bixby Site (David M. Simmons, Myron 181 O . Stachiw and John E. Worrell) SECTION V. Post-excavation analysis 198 13. Computer-aided Harris Matrix generation (Irmela H erzog) 201 14. Interpreting archaeology with Hindsight: the use of three dimensions in graphic 218 recording and site analysis (Bryan A.P. Alvey) 15. Beyond crossmellds: stratigraphic analysis and the content of historic artefact assemblages 229 on urban sites (Richard H. Gerrard) 16. The seriation of multilinear stratigraphic sequences (John Triggs) 250 V I Contents SECTION VI. Future developments 274 17. Sites withollt Principles: post-excavation analysis of' pre-matrix' sites (Peter R. Clark) 276 Index 293 Foreword It is an honour to be asked to write a prefatory page to Practices of Archaeological Stratigraphy, a book which shows how widely Edward Harris's matrix concept has become used . In less than two decades the Harris Matrix has gone from being an esoteric recording format of the Winchester Research Unit to a generic research tool of archaeologists across the world. The applications in this book, by scholars working on sites from shell-middens in the Pacific Northwest to medieval towns in Poland, from the Maya of the Central American rainforest to the urban complexities of York with its two millennia of packed urban deposits, show how deeply Harris's ideas have penetrated our professional conscIOusness. The idea of a stratigraphic diagram' which was procedurally rigorous, forcing the excavator to account for every defined context in spatial and chronological relation to its neighbours, and thus to think honestly about what the evidence meant throughout a project rather than only at the stage of writing up, was both new and welcome when Harris first introduced it in 1973. The standing section was still the principal means of displaying stratigraphic data and elucidating its chronological and cultural significance, although some British excavators, notably Brian Hope-Taylor at Yeavering, and Martin Biddle and Birthe Kj0lbye-Biddle at Winchester, had begun to argue for the primacy of the phase plan. The Harris Matrix was the ideal way of reconciling these two complementary, yet in some ways contradictory, methods of putting a site on to paper and making it comprehensible to others. It was value-neutral, not imposing anything on the excavator except an obligation to think clearly, denying nothing but the chance to fudge a difficult point. Its utility was not confined to ordering buried deposits, as some of the applications cited in the second edition of Harris's classic Principles of Archaeological Stl'atigraphy and some of the chapters in this book show, the matrix format is as relevant to the above-ground archaeology of standing buildings such as Sandgate Castle in England or the Bixby House in Massachusetts. In spite of the sniffy attitude taken by some geoarchaeologists, the matrix, as a simple way of enforcing ordered thinking, is just as capable of helping them to make sense of their deposits and interfaces. The discipline imposed by using the matrix has resulted in some other important developments, notably the idea of single-context planning. If each context has to be accounted for separately in the matrix, then it should be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archaeological Sequence Diagrams and Bayesian Chronological Models
    This is a repository copy of Archaeological sequence diagrams and Bayesian chronological models. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/90295/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Dye, T.S. and Buck, C.E. (2015) Archaeological sequence diagrams and Bayesian chronological models. Journal of Archaeological Science, 63. 84 - 93. ISSN 0305-4403 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.08.008 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 Title Archaeological Sequence Diagrams and Bayesian Chronological Models 2 Authors Thomas S. Dye1 and Caitlin E. Buck 3 Ailiations University of Hawai‘i at Manoa¯ and University of Sheffield 4 Address for correspondence 735 Bishop St., Suite 315, Honolulu, HI 96813 5 Email for correspondence [email protected] 6 Approximate number of words 5071 1Corresponding author. 1 7 Abstract 8 This paper develops directed graph representations for a class of archaeological sequence 9 diagrams, such as the Harris Matrix, that do not include information on duration.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Record: the What, How and When of Stratigraphy
    No. 83/84, 2007 70 Ontario Archaeology For the Record: The What, How and When of Stratigraphy Henry C. Cary and Joseph H. Last Ontario archaeologists approach stratigraphy from a number ofdirections, a situation born from the adop­ tion and adaptation of Canadian, American, and British field techniques. Each method is suitable for cer­ tain conditions, but we suggest that stratigraphic excavation must be used to understand site formation. Our technique focuses on the single stratigraphic unit and asks ofit three questions: what is its nature? (jill buried sad, or flature); how did it get there? (primary or secondary deposition); and when was it deposited' (the relationship to other layers and flatures). Posing these questions during excavation ensures that crucial infor­ mation is not lost once the site is disturbed and allows the archaeologist to determine the site-wide sequence and phases ofdevelopment later in the analysis. Detailed stratigraphic recording and analysis is often seen as time consuming, especially in mitz.'gation excavations, but we will introduce methods currently in use at stratigraphically complex military sites in Ontario that effict rapid, thorough, and accurate recording. Introduction Archaeological Services, Military Sites, a small group dedicated to cultural resource management Archaeologists in Ontario approach strarigraphy in of military National Historic Sites in Ontario. diverse ways. Some dig in arbitrary spits, then Over the past 24 years we have developed a system record and correlate the stratigraphic profile later to help us answer these inquiries. We do not intend in the analysis. Many excavate stratigraphically. to argue that our method is more effective than any removing each stratum in the reverse order of dep­ other, but merely want to present how it applies to osition while leaving baulks afterward drawn in our research.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BULLETIN Number 84 Summer 1982
    THE BULLETIN Number 84 Summer 1982 CONTENTS The Tiger Lily Site, Long Island, New York: A Preliminary Report Stanley Wisniewski and Gretchen Gwynne 1 The Archaeology of Walter's Spit Donna Ottusch 18 The Sojourner's Rockshelter Paul Weinman and Thomas Weinman 29 Don't Miss AENA 10 30 An Important Exhibit 30 No. 84, Summer, 1982 1 THE TIGER LILY SITE, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK: A PRELIMINARY REPORT Stanley Wisniewski Metropolitan Chapter Gretchen Anderson Gwynne Gong Island Chapter INTRODUCTION On the north shore of Long Island, New Yo rk, sheltered from the North Atlantic by the fish-shaped body of the Island, lies Mount Sinai Harbor. a small, tidal basin of glacial origin ringed by low hills. The harbor is protected from the open waters of Long Island Sound by a sandy barrier bar (Cedar Beach), now channeled at the west end permitting the tidal exchange of salt water from the sound (see map). (The barrier bar has apparently existed since the time of first human occupation of the area. although the location of its opening into the sound has changed from time to time.) Tidal exchange from the sound is an important condition for shellfish growth at Mount Sinai Harbor and archaeological evidence has shown the harbor to have been the source of a variety of saltwater shellfish throughout its long, history of human occupation. In the prehistoric period, the now-dredged harbor was all extraordinarily rich marshland into which emptied at least three freshwater streams as well as numerous rivulets of fresh groundwater run-off. These fresh-water sources provided the marsh with the saline balance necessary for the proliferation of oysters and other shellfish.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Archaeology in Michael Redhill's Toronto Novel Consolation
    Urban Archaeology in Michael Redhill’s Toronto Novel Consolation Meeria Vesala University of Tampere Faculty of Communication Sciences Master’s Programme in English Language and Literature MA Thesis May 2018 Tampereen yliopisto Viestintätieteiden tiedekunta Englannin kielen ja kirjallisuuden maisterikoulutus VESALA, MEERIA: Urban Archaeology in Michael Redhill’s Toronto Novel Consolation Pro Gradu -tutkielma, 117 sivua + lähdeluettelo Toukokuu 2018 Tutkielmani käsittelee urbaanin arkeologian tematiikkaa ja arkeologian metaforista sekä käsitteellistä merkitystä kanadalaisessa kaupunkikirjallisuudessa. Tutkimusaineistoni keskiössä on Michael Redhillin Torontoon sijoittuva historiallinen kaupunkiromaani Consolation (2006), jota analysoin ensisijaisesti kirjassa esitetyn tarinan ilmentämän tilallisuuden kautta. Romaanin tapahtumat eivät ole ainoastaan sidoksissa tiettyyn aikaan (1857/1997) ja paikkaan (Toronto), kuten kirjallisuudentutkimuksessa on usein tapana ymmärtää, vaan lähtökohtaisesti itse ympäristö tuottaa tilallisia tapahtumaketjuja, jotka ohjaavat kaupunkilaisten tottumuksia, tuntemuksia ja toimintaa eri elämänalueilla. Romaanin urbaani tila, miljoonakaupunki Ontario-järven rannalla, on havainnollistava esimerkki ajan ja paikan jatkuvasta yhteentörmäyksestä ja muutoksesta, joka on nähtävissä niin todellisen kuin kuvitellun kaupungin kuvassa. Toronton muodonmuutos pienestä rajaseudun kylästä tunnetuksi maailman metropoliksi viimeisen puolentoista vuosisadan aikana viestittää paikan ainutlaatuisesta olemuksesta ja luonteesta, minkä
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting the Harris Matrix for Software Stratigraphy
    Adapting the Harris Matrix for Software Stratigraphy Andrew Reinhard Edward Harris’s (1979) landmark work, Principles of preservation of these born-digital archaeological Archaeological Stratigraphy, from which sprouted sites. the idea and practice of the Harris matrix, became This is not a new concern for people who work within the broad my windmill (or albatross) in 2017 as I attempted to umbrella of “digital humanities.” “Software archaeology”—the leverage its data visualization technique onto a digital attempt to reverse-engineer poorly documented (or undocu- mented) software in order to restore and preserve functionality— archaeological site. This visualization would not only has existed formally for over 15 years.1 Digital preservation is allow archaeologists to understand the composition also not a new idea and forms a border of software archaeology; namely, what to do with software post-use or post-“excavation.”2 and history of a digital built environment—something None of the software archaeology approaches, however, treat important to the emerging field of digital heritage— software as archaeological sites in the traditional sense, and I wanted to see what would happen if I conducted a truly archaeo- but also would contribute to the conservation and logical investigation of a software application using a tool known ABSTRACT In 1979, Edward C. Harris invented and published his eponymous matrix for visualizing stratigraphy, creating an indispensable tool for generations of archaeologists. When presenting his matrix, Harris also detailed his four laws of archaeological stratigraphy: superposition, original horizontal, original continuity, and stratigraphic succession. In 2017, I created the first stratigraphic matrix for software, using as a test the 2016 video game No Man’s Sky (Hello Games).
    [Show full text]
  • Churchyard Archaeology.Pdf
    Churchyard Archaeology: Archaeological Investigations at the First Baptist Church in America Edited by Zachary Nelson and Katherine Marino Report of Field Investigations at the First Baptist Church in America, Providence, Rhode Island, undertaken August-December, 2006 Churchyard Archaeology: Archaeological Investigations at the First Baptist Church in America. Edited by Zachary Nelson and Katherine Marino Copyright 2007 Report of Field Investigations at the First Baptist Church in America, Providence, Rhode Island undertaken August-December, 2006. Zachary Nelson, Principal Investigator Table of Contents List of Figures .......................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ........................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgments .................................................................................................... ix Section I: The Church and its Archaeology Chapter 1. Churchyard Archaeology and Picnics Zachary Nelson and Zöe Agoos........................................................ 2 Chapter 2. A Brief History of the First Baptist Church in America Katherine Marino............................................................................. 7 Standing Artifacts: New England Church Architecture Cody Campanie................................................................................. 16 Map and Pictoral History of the First Baptist Church Tina Lee Charest..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology: the Key Concepts Is the Ideal Reference Guide for Students, Teachers and Anyone with an Interest in Archaeology
    ARCHAEOLOGY: THE KEY CONCEPTS This invaluable resource provides an up-to-date and comprehensive survey of key ideas in archaeology and their impact on archaeological thinking and method. Featuring over fifty detailed entries by international experts, the book offers definitions of key terms, explaining their origin and development. Entries also feature guides to further reading and extensive cross-referencing. Subjects covered include: ● Thinking about landscape ● Cultural evolution ● Social archaeology ● Gender archaeology ● Experimental archaeology ● Archaeology of cult and religion ● Concepts of time ● The Antiquity of Man ● Feminist archaeology ● Multiregional evolution Archaeology: The Key Concepts is the ideal reference guide for students, teachers and anyone with an interest in archaeology. Colin Renfrew is Emeritus Disney Professor of Archaeology and Fellow of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge. Paul Bahn is a freelance writer, translator and broadcaster on archaeology. YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN THE FOLLOWING ROUTLEDGE STUDENT REFERENCE TITLES: Archaeology: The Basics Clive Gamble Ancient History: Key Themes and Approaches Neville Morley Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in the Greek World John Hazel Who’s Who in the Roman World John Hazel ARCHAEOLOGY The Key Concepts Edited by Colin Renfrew and Paul Bahn LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2005 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX 14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Methodology to the Fore: the Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi Paul Everill, Nikoloz Antidze, Davit Lomitashvili, Nikoloz Murgulia
    Bringing methodology to the fore: The Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi Paul Everill, Nikoloz Antidze, Davit Lomitashvili, Nikoloz Murgulia Abstract The Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi has been working in Samegrelo, Georgia, since 2001, building on the work carried out by archaeologists from the S. Janashia Museum since 1973. The expedition has trained nearly 250 Georgian and British students in modern archaeological methodology since 2001, and over that same period Georgia has changed enormously, both politically and in its approach to cultural heritage. This paper seeks to contextualise the recent contribution of British archaeological methodology to the rich history of archaeological work in Georgia, and to consider the emergence of a dynamic cultural heritage sector within Georgia since 2004. Introduction A small village in the predominantly rural, western Georgian region of Mingrelia (Samgrelo) hosts a surprising and spectacular historic site. A fortress supposedly established by Kuji, a semi-mythical ruler of west Georgia in the vein of the British King Arthur, provides the stage for the story of an alliance with King Parnavaz of east Georgia (Iberia) and the overthrow of Hellenistic overlords. As a result Nokalakevi has become a potent political symbol of a united, independent Georgia and a backdrop to presidential campaign launches. Known as Tsikhegoji in the Mingrelian dialect, meaning Fortress/ Castle of Kuji, the Byzantine name Archaeopolis (old city) mirrors the literal meaning of the Georgian name, Nokalakevi – ruins where a town was – in suggesting that, even when the Laz and their Byzantine allies fortified the site in the 4th, 5th and 6th centuries AD, the ruins of the Hellenistic period town may have still been visible.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Recording Practices Guidelines for Archaeological Excavation and Recording Techniques
    Archaeological Recording Practices Guidelines for archaeological excavation and recording techniques www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk Contents This field training pack aims to support you with archaeological recording processes. These will include: Excavating a Feature 3 Recording Introduction 4 Recording Using Photography 6 Drawing Conventions 9 Drawing Sections 10 Drawing Plans 12 Levelling and Coordinates 14 Recording Cuts 16 Recording Deposits 17 Recording Interpretation 20 General Discussion 22 The Harris Matrix 23 Finds 26 Environmental Samples 27 Human Remains 29 Health and Safety 30 Glossary of Terms 31 2 Gemma Stewart 2013 Excavating a Feature Archaeological excavation is the primary means in which we gather information. It is critical that it is carried out carefully and in a logical manner. The flow chart below has been provided to show the steps required for fully excavating and recording a feature. Identify feature Clean area to find the extent of the feature Consider if pre-excavation photos and plan are required Select appropriate equipment Use nails and string to mark out section for excavation Excavate the feature/deposit carefully removing the latest context first If finds are present bag finds from each context separately Take environmental samples if necessary Remove any loose spoil and tidy feature ready for recording Take out numbers (context, section and plan) Photograph the feature/section Draw the section Draw the plan Measure levels Complete context sheets File paperwork 3 Recording Introduction Excavation results in the destruction of contexts, therefore, a detailed and correct record of the archaeology discovered is required in order to produce and maintain a permanent archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities for Analysing Stratigraphic Data
    Possibilities for Analysing Stratigraphic Data Possibilities for Analysing Stratigraphic Data Irmela Herzog, Bonn Introduction More than 25 years after the first publication on the principles of archaeological stratigraphy by Edward Harris (Harris, 1975; www:harrismatrix) many archaeologists consider the corresponding methods of excavation, recording and analysis as a matter of course (Renfrew / Bahn 1996, 102; Roskams 2001, 110). Even in Germany, a small Harris matrix can be found on the cover of a new book on methods in archaeology (Eggert 2001). In my view there is no other appropriate way to record and analyse deeply stratified sites in urban areas. This paper presents a new computer program for Harris matrix generation which draws not only on my experiences with my first Harris program created more than ten years ago (Herzog / Scollar 1991; Herzog 1993), but provides new possibilities for data exploration and presentation. My aim is to assist the analysis and display of stratigraphic relationships in datasets of 500 contexts or more. According to the MAP 2 standard established by English Heritage in 1991, for small projects, i.e. ones with less than 500 stratigraphic units, the Harris matrix is created manually (Watson 2000, 152). Personally, even in the case of 200 or 300 contexts, a special program for Harris matrix design is helpful, but with more than 500 stratigraphic units, such a program becomes mandatory, in order to maintain control of the data set. Some of the currently available computer programs for Harris matrix generation are based on a graph editor (Ryan 1995; www:gnet; www:ArchEd), where the user may position the boxes manually.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavation Report
    T H A M E S V A L L E Y ARCHAEOLOGICAL S E R V I C E S Roman occupation on land off Orchard Way, Harwell, Oxfordshire Archaeological Excavation by Pierre-Damien Manisse Site Code: OWH19/62 (SU 4881 8915 ) Roman occupation on land off Orchard Way, Harwell, Oxfordshire An Archaeological Excavation For Heritage Plan by Pierre-Damien Manisse Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code OWH 19/62 November 2019 Summary Site name: Land off Orchard Way, Harwell, Oxfordshire Grid reference: SU 4881 8915 Site activity: Archaeological Excavation Date and duration of project: 15th July to 2nd August 2019 Project coordinator: Tim Dawson Site supervisor: Pierre-Damien Manisse Site code: OWH 19/62 Area of site: 2300 sq. m. Summary of results: A number of cut features (ditch, gullies, pit) were revealed spanning Late Iron Age/Early Roman to Later Roman times. They included a refuse pit, possible well or water hole, parts of enclosures, several parallel gullies that could be traces of land exploitation and two other perpendicular gullies that might have defined a pathway. A cremation unurned but contained within a container of perishable material, such as a casket, had been highly decorated with nails. Location and reference of archive: The archive is presently held at Thames Valley Archaeological Services, Reading and will be deposited at Oxfordshire Museum Service in due course. This report may be copied for bona fide research or planning purposes without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. All TVAS unpublished fieldwork reports are available on our website: www.tvas.co.uk/reports/reports.asp.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS ST 2833 NW 41 ST. UNIT 130 GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32606 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF June 1, 2018 Regulatory Division West Branch Tampa Permits Section Gainesville Field Office PUBLIC NOTICE Permit Application No. SAJ-2011-02369 (SP-JED) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. §403) as described below: APPLICANT: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Marshall W. Flake 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399 WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The project would affect waters of the United States associated with the Gulf of Mexico. The project site is located at the .Honeymoon Island State Park, 1 Causeway Boulevard, in Sections 7, 8, 17, and 18, Township 28 South, Range 15 East, Dunedin, Pinellas County, Florida. Directions to the site are as follows: From the intersection of US-19 and SR-586 (Curlew Rd.) in Pinellas County, proceed west along Curlew to Dunedin Causeway. Follow the causeway to Honeymoon Island State Park. Once inside the park, continue to the south beach parking lot to access the dredge area, or the north beach parking lot to access the fill area. APPROXIMATE CENTRAL COORDINATES: Latitude 28.057553° Longitude -82.825009° PROJECT PURPOSE: Basic: The basic project purpose is shoreline stabilization. Overall: The overall project purpose is dredging to obtain suitable fill material to perform beach and dune renourishment to stabilize the of Honeymoon Island shoreline.
    [Show full text]