Identification of Molecular Compartments and Genetic Circuitry in the Developing Mammalian Kidney Jing Yu1,2, M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Identification of Molecular Compartments and Genetic Circuitry in the Developing Mammalian Kidney Jing Yu1,2, M RESEARCH ARTICLE 1863 Development 139, 1863-1873 (2012) doi:10.1242/dev.074005 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Identification of molecular compartments and genetic circuitry in the developing mammalian kidney Jing Yu1,2, M. Todd Valerius1,*, Mary Duah1, Karl Staser1, Jennifer K. Hansard1, Jin-jin Guo1, Jill McMahon1, Joe Vaughan1, Diane Faria1, Kylie Georgas3, Bree Rumballe3, Qun Ren2, A. Michaela Krautzberger1, Jan P. Junker4, Rathi D. Thiagarajan3, Philip Machanick3,‡, Paul A. Gray5,§, Alexander van Oudenaarden4, David H. Rowitch6, Charles D. Stiles7, Qiufu Ma5, Sean M. Grimmond3, Timothy L. Bailey3, Melissa H. Little3 and Andrew P. McMahon1,¶ SUMMARY Lengthy developmental programs generate cell diversity within an organotypic framework, enabling the later physiological actions of each organ system. Cell identity, cell diversity and cell function are determined by cell type-specific transcriptional programs; consequently, transcriptional regulatory factors are useful markers of emerging cellular complexity, and their expression patterns provide insights into the regulatory mechanisms at play. We performed a comprehensive genome-scale in situ expression screen of 921 transcriptional regulators in the developing mammalian urogenital system. Focusing on the kidney, analysis of regional-specific expression patterns identified novel markers and cell types associated with development and patterning of the urinary system. Furthermore, promoter analysis of synexpressed genes predicts transcriptional control mechanisms that regulate cell differentiation. The annotated informational resource (www.gudmap.org) will facilitate functional analysis of the mammalian kidney and provides useful information for the generation of novel genetic tools to manipulate emerging cell populations. KEY WORDS: Genome-scale expression screen, Transcriptional regulator, Kidney, Mouse INTRODUCTION that cap each branch tip (Carroll et al., 2005; Kobayashi et al., The mammalian metanephric kidney is essential for the 2008; Park et al., 2007). At each round of branching, a subset of maintenance of water and electrolyte homeostasis, the regulation these progenitors undergoes an epithelial transition that establishes of blood pressure and blood cell composition, and bone formation a renal vesicle (RV). RVs undergo elaborate patterning and (Koeppen and Stanton, 2001). Development of a functional kidney morphogenesis along a glomerular-collecting duct axis that is requires a complex interplay among its principal cellular crucial for organ function. A highly developed vascular network components (Costantini and Kopan, 2010; Dressler, 2009). (Gomez et al., 1997; Woolf and Loughna, 1998), interstitial support The nephric duct-derived ureteric epithelium forms the arborized cells and a variety of distinct subregions with specialized properties network of the collecting duct system in response to branching that include contractile and sensory functions all contribute to the signals derived from adjacent mesenchyme. This network is crucial physiological actions of the kidney. for urine transport from the nephron to the ureter, and the Not surprisingly, given the central role of the kidney in human maintenance of pH and osmolarity in tissue fluids. Signals from the health, the experimental analysis of mammalian kidney nascent ureteric epithelium regulate survival, proliferation and development has received considerable attention. The kidney was differentiation of mesenchymal, stem cell-like, nephron progenitors the first mammalian organ shown to replicate a developmental program in culture (Grobstein, 1953; Grobstein, 1955; Saxen, 1987). Since those pioneering studies in the 1950s, a wealth of 1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Department of Molecular and genetic, molecular and cellular information has informed on the Cellular Biology, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, control of kidney development (Costantini and Kopan, 2010; Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. 2Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. 3Institute for Molecular Dressler, 2009). Collectively, these studies have underscored the Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia. 4Department of complexity of kidney development, and highlighted the need for a Physics and Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts more systematic analysis of cell types, cell relationships and cell 5 Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Department of Neurobiology, Harvard interactions in the assembly of the kidney. The increasing evidence Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 6Departments of Pediatrics and Neurological Surgery, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San that developmental deficiencies increase the risk of kidney disease Francisco, 35 Medical Center Way, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. 7Department of in later life emphasizes the need to enhance our understanding of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, developmental events (Bertram et al., 2011; Song and Yosypiv, USA. 2011). *Present address: Department of Surgery, Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess One barrier to progress is a dearth of molecular markers that can Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA distinguish cell types and facilitate analysis of developmental ‡Present address: Department of Computer Science, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa programs. In many systems, transcriptional regulators have served §Present address: Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University as important cell type-specific markers and drivers of cell School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA specification and differentiation. For example, large-scale ¶Author for correspondence ([email protected]) expression screens of transcriptional regulators have proven fruitful Accepted 1 March 2012 in identifying organizational and developmental features in the DEVELOPMENT 1864 RESEARCH ARTICLE Development 139 (10) assembly of the mammalian nervous system (Gray et al., 2004). In situ hybridization of whole-mount urogenital systems with We surmised that systematic identification of the expression digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes patterns of a large set of transcriptional regulators in the developing For whole-mount in situ hybridization, E15.5 urogenital system samples urogenital system would provide new insights into the emergence were rehydrated through a graded series of methanol/NaCl. After of cell heterogeneity central to kidney formation and function. proteinase K (10 mg/ml) treatment for 30 minutes, samples were fixed Furthermore, the accrued data could potentially facilitate in silico again and prehybridized at 70°C for 1 hour before being hybridized with 500 ng/ml digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes at 70°C overnight. All steps prediction of gene networks, and enable the design of novel genetic post-hybridization were performed with a BioLane HTI liquid handling approaches for analysis of key cell types. system (Intavis Bioanalytical Instruments AG, Widdersdorferstrasse, Here, we report on a genome-scale in situ analysis of the Koeln, Germany). Briefly, samples were washed with hot solutions at 65°C expression of genes encoding mammalian transcriptional and treated with 100 mg/ml RNase A for 1 hour. After additional stringent regulatory factors in the developing mouse urogenital system. Our hot washes, samples were washed with 1ϫMBST [0.1 M maleic acid, 0.15 analysis provides a wealth of new markers of kidney development M NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20 (pH 7.5)], blocked in blocking solution (10% and reveals novel molecular subdomains in developing renal sheep serum in MBST plus 2% Boehringer Mannheim Blocking Reagent) structures. A meta-analysis of selected transcriptional regulators for 3-4 hours at room temperature, and incubated subsequently with anti- highlights the potential of this dataset for discovery of networks digoxigenin antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (AP) (Roche, governing differentiation of terminal cell fates. Indianapolis, IN, USA, 1:4000) overnight at 4°C. Extensive washing in 1ϫMBST was followed by incubation in NTMT [100 mM NaCl, 100 mM MATERIALS AND METHODS Tris-HCl (pH 9.5), 50 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween-20, 2 mM levamisole). Further details of the protocols described below can be found Samples were then removed from the BioLane HTI, and the hybridization at http://www.gudmap.org/Research/Protocols/McMahon.html and signal visualized by adding BM purple. Color reactions were terminated at http://www.gudmap.org/Research/Protocols/Little.html. All experimental 3-hour, 6-hour, 9-hour, 12-hour, 24-hour, 36-hour and 48-hour time points, procedures with mice were performed in accordance with institutional and when signals were strong or a background developed. After development national animal welfare laws, guidelines and policies, and were approved of the colorimetric assay, samples were post-fixed, cleared through a by relevant institutional animal care committees. graded series of glycerol and stored in 80% glycerol/PBS. Images were then captured with a Nikon DXM1200 digital camera (Nikon, Melville, Plasmid preparation and riboprobe production NY, USA), attached to a Nikon SMZ1500 stereoscope (Nikon, Melville, Plasmid glycerol stocks from the Brain Molecular Anatomy Project NY, USA) at two different magnifications to view the entire urogenital (BMAP) cDNA
Recommended publications
  • Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitries in Cancer
    Oncogene (2020) 39:6633–6646 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01459-w REVIEW ARTICLE Core transcriptional regulatory circuitries in cancer 1 1,2,3 1 2 1,4,5 Ye Chen ● Liang Xu ● Ruby Yu-Tong Lin ● Markus Müschen ● H. Phillip Koeffler Received: 14 June 2020 / Revised: 30 August 2020 / Accepted: 4 September 2020 / Published online: 17 September 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract Transcription factors (TFs) coordinate the on-and-off states of gene expression typically in a combinatorial fashion. Studies from embryonic stem cells and other cell types have revealed that a clique of self-regulated core TFs control cell identity and cell state. These core TFs form interconnected feed-forward transcriptional loops to establish and reinforce the cell-type- specific gene-expression program; the ensemble of core TFs and their regulatory loops constitutes core transcriptional regulatory circuitry (CRC). Here, we summarize recent progress in computational reconstitution and biologic exploration of CRCs across various human malignancies, and consolidate the strategy and methodology for CRC discovery. We also discuss the genetic basis and therapeutic vulnerability of CRC, and highlight new frontiers and future efforts for the study of CRC in cancer. Knowledge of CRC in cancer is fundamental to understanding cancer-specific transcriptional addiction, and should provide important insight to both pathobiology and therapeutics. 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: Introduction genes. Till now, one critical goal in biology remains to understand the composition and hierarchy of transcriptional Transcriptional regulation is one of the fundamental mole- regulatory network in each specified cell type/lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Pronephros and Development of Mesonephric Kidney in Larvae of Russian Sturgeon, Acipenser Gueldenstaedtii Brandt (Acipenseridae)
    Zoologica5 PRONEPHROS Poloniae-AND (2012)-MESONEPHRIC 57/1-4: 5-20-KIDNEY-IN-LARVAE-OF-A.-GUELDENSTAEDTII 5 DOI: 10.2478/v10049-012-0001-6 STRUCTURE OF PRONEPHROS AND DEVELOPMENT OF MESONEPHRIC KIDNEY IN LARVAE OF RUSSIAN STURGEON, ACIPENSER GUELDENSTAEDTII BRANDT (ACIPENSERIDAE) L.S. KRAYUSHKINA*1, A.A. GERASIMOV1, A.A. KIRSANOV1, M.V. MOSYAGINA1, A. OGORZA£EK2 1Department of Ichthyology and Hydrobiology, St. Petersburg State University, 16-th Line 29, 199178, St. Petersburg, Russia, [email protected] 2 Department of Animal Developmental Biology, Zoological Institute, University of Wroclaw, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wroclaw, Poland. *Corresponding author Abstract. The structure of the pronephros and development of mesonephric kidney in Russian sturgeon larvae, Acipenser gueldenstaedtii Brandt at different stages of early postembryonic development (from hatching to 14 days), were studied with histological and electronic microscopy methods. The larval pronephros is represented by the system of bilaterally located pronephric tubules with ciliated nephrostomes and funnels and exog- enous single glomus, which is not integrated directly into pronephric tubules and located in the pronephric chamber. The glomus is positioned below the dorsal aorta and vascular- ized by its capillaries. The glomus has the same features of the thin structure that are typical of and necessary for the function of a filtering organ. The structure of the prone- phros in acipenserids is discussed and compared with teleosts and amphibians. Histogen- esis of the mesonephric kidney is observed during the period of pronephros functioning; it is complete by the time the larvae transfer to exogenous feeding. At this moment, the pronephros undergoes significant structural degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stem Cells in the Embryonic Kidney R Nishinakamura1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector http://www.kidney-international.org mini review & 2008 International Society of Nephrology Stem cells in the embryonic kidney R Nishinakamura1 1Division of Integrative Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Embryology and Genetics, Kumamoto University, 2-2-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Japan The mammalian kidney, the metanephros, is formed by a STRATEGY TOWARD KIDNEY RECONSTITUTION USING reciprocally inductive interaction between two precursor PROGENITOR CELLS tissues, the metanephric mesenchyme and the ureteric bud. Stem cells are defined by two criteria: self-renewal and The ureteric bud induces the metanephric mesenchyme to multipotency. Few reports in the kidney field have addressed differentiate into the epithelia of glomeruli and renal tubules. both of these criteria at a clonal level, so it is better to use the Multipotent renal progenitors that form colonies upon Wnt4 term ‘progenitor’ rather than ‘stem cells.’ In this review, renal stimulation and strongly express Sall1 exist in the progenitors in the embryonic kidney, not those in the adult metanephric mesenchyme; these cells can partially kidney, from the viewpoint of developmental biology and reconstitute a three-dimensional structure in an organ stem/progenitor cell biology will be discussed. To generate culture setting. Six2 maintains this mesenchymal progenitor multiple cell lineages for kidney regeneration, the identifica- population by opposing Wnt4-mediated epithelialization. tion of renal progenitors is a prerequisite. Furthermore, there Upon epithelial tube formation, Notch2 is required for the exist three obstacles to be overcome: (1) derivation of the differentiation of proximal nephron structures (podocyte and renal progenitors; (2) expansion of the renal progenitors; and proximal tubules).
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Materials ZNF281 Enhances Cardiac Reprogramming
    Supplemental Materials ZNF281 enhances cardiac reprogramming by modulating cardiac and inflammatory gene expression Huanyu Zhou, Maria Gabriela Morales, Hisayuki Hashimoto, Matthew E. Dickson, Kunhua Song, Wenduo Ye, Min S. Kim, Hanspeter Niederstrasser, Zhaoning Wang, Beibei Chen, Bruce A. Posner, Rhonda Bassel-Duby and Eric N. Olson Supplemental Table 1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 2; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 3; related to the “quantitative mRNA measurement” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Table 4; related to the “ChIP-seq, gene ontology and pathway analysis” and “RNA-seq” and gene ontology analysis” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Figure S1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Figure S2; related to Figure 2. Supplemental Figure S3; related to Figure 3. Supplemental Figure S4; related to Figure 4. Supplemental Figure S5; related to Figure 6. Supplemental Table S1. Genes included in human retroviral ORF cDNA library. Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol AATF BMP8A CEBPE CTNNB1 ESR2 GDF3 HOXA5 IL17D ADIPOQ BRPF1 CEBPG CUX1 ESRRA GDF6 HOXA6 IL17F ADNP BRPF3 CERS1 CX3CL1 ETS1 GIN1 HOXA7 IL18 AEBP1 BUD31 CERS2 CXCL10 ETS2 GLIS3 HOXB1 IL19 AFF4 C17ORF77 CERS4 CXCL11 ETV3 GMEB1 HOXB13 IL1A AHR C1QTNF4 CFL2 CXCL12 ETV7 GPBP1 HOXB5 IL1B AIMP1 C21ORF66 CHIA CXCL13 FAM3B GPER HOXB6 IL1F3 ALS2CR8 CBFA2T2 CIR1 CXCL14 FAM3D GPI HOXB7 IL1F5 ALX1 CBFA2T3 CITED1 CXCL16 FASLG GREM1 HOXB9 IL1F6 ARGFX CBFB CITED2 CXCL3 FBLN1 GREM2 HOXC4 IL1F7
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis of KRAS Mutant Cell Lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of KRAS mutant cell lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K. Durand2,5, Kirsten L. Bryant2, Tikvah K. Hayes2, Sen Peng3, Nhan L. Tran4, Gerald C. Gooden1, David N. Buckley1, Channing J. Der2, Albert S. Baldwin2 ✉ & Bodour Salhia1 ✉ Oncogenic RAS mutations are associated with DNA methylation changes that alter gene expression to drive cancer. Recent studies suggest that DNA methylation changes may be stochastic in nature, while other groups propose distinct signaling pathways responsible for aberrant methylation. Better understanding of DNA methylation events associated with oncogenic KRAS expression could enhance therapeutic approaches. Here we analyzed the basal CpG methylation of 11 KRAS-mutant and dependent pancreatic cancer cell lines and observed strikingly similar methylation patterns. KRAS knockdown resulted in unique methylation changes with limited overlap between each cell line. In KRAS-mutant Pa16C pancreatic cancer cells, while KRAS knockdown resulted in over 8,000 diferentially methylated (DM) CpGs, treatment with the ERK1/2-selective inhibitor SCH772984 showed less than 40 DM CpGs, suggesting that ERK is not a broadly active driver of KRAS-associated DNA methylation. KRAS G12V overexpression in an isogenic lung model reveals >50,600 DM CpGs compared to non-transformed controls. In lung and pancreatic cells, gene ontology analyses of DM promoters show an enrichment for genes involved in diferentiation and development. Taken all together, KRAS-mediated DNA methylation are stochastic and independent of canonical downstream efector signaling. These epigenetically altered genes associated with KRAS expression could represent potential therapeutic targets in KRAS-driven cancer. Activating KRAS mutations can be found in nearly 25 percent of all cancers1.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Underlying Hub Genes and Molexular Pathogensis in Gastric Cancer by Integrated Bioinformatic Analyses
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.423656; this version posted December 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Investigation of the underlying hub genes and molexular pathogensis in gastric cancer by integrated bioinformatic analyses Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karanataka, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.423656; this version posted December 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract The high mortality rate of gastric cancer (GC) is in part due to the absence of initial disclosure of its biomarkers. The recognition of important genes associated in GC is therefore recommended to advance clinical prognosis, diagnosis and and treatment outcomes. The current investigation used the microarray dataset GSE113255 RNA seq data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database to diagnose differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Pathway and gene ontology enrichment analyses were performed, and a proteinprotein interaction network, modules, target genes - miRNA regulatory network and target genes - TF regulatory network were constructed and analyzed. Finally, validation of hub genes was performed. The 1008 DEGs identified consisted of 505 up regulated genes and 503 down regulated genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Molecular Mechanisms in Intestinal Stem Cells and Colorectal
    JENNY HÖGSTRÖM-STAKEM Analysis of Molecular Pathways in Intestinal Stem Cells and Colorectal Cancer Progression JENNY HÖGSTRÖM-STAKEM Analysis of Molecular Pathways in Recent Publications in this Series 67/2018 Lasse Karhu Computational Analysis of Orexin Receptors and Their Interactions with Natural and Synthetic Ligands 68/2018 Hanna Pitkänen Alterations and Impact of Thrombin Generation and Clot Formation in Solvent/Detergent Plasma, FXIII Deficiency and Lysinuric Protein Intolerance DISSERTATIONES SCHOLAE DOCTORALIS AD SANITATEM INVESTIGANDAM 69/2018 Riikka Havunen UNIVERSITATIS HELSINKIENSIS 87/2018 Enhancing Adoptive Cell Therapy of Solid Tumours with Armed Oncolytic Adenoviruses 70/2018 Patrick Penttilä Novel Biomarkers in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma 71/2018 Jaakko Keinänen Metabolic Changes, Inflammation and Mortality in Psychotic Disorders 72/2018 Heidi Marjonen JENNY HÖGSTRÖM-STAKEM Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on the Epigenome, Gene Expression and Development 73/2018 Dyah Listyarifah The Role of the Oral Spirochete Treponema denticola in Periodontitis and Orodigestive Analysis of Molecular Pathways in Intestinal Stem Carcinogenesis Cells and Colorectal Cancer Progression 74/2018 Teija-Kaisa Aholaakko Intraoperative Aseptic Practices and Surgical Site Infections in Breast Surgery 75/2018 Cecilia Anna Brunello Tau Pathology: Secretion and Internalization as the Key for Understanding Protein Propagation 76/2018 Niko M. Perttilä Exercise and Falls among Frail Older People – Special Focus on People with Dementia 77/2018
    [Show full text]
  • Secreted Molecules in Metanephric Induction
    J Am Soc Nephrol 11: S116–S119, 2000 Secreted Molecules in Metanephric Induction THOMAS J. CARROLL and ANDREW P. McMAHON Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Abstract. Nearly 50 yr ago, Clifford Grobstein made the ob- the classic model of metanephric induction. The studies of the servation that the ureteric bud induced the nephrogenic mes- classic ureteric inducer performed to date have most likely enchyme to undergo tubulogenesis. Since that discovery, sci- been characterizations of a mesenchyme-specific inducer, entists have attempted to characterize the molecular nature of Wnt-4, and its role in tubulogenesis. Ureteric induction most the inducer. To date, no single molecule that is both necessary likely involves a series of distinct events that provide prolif- and sufficient for nephric induction has been identified. Be- erative, survival, and condensation signals to the mesenchyme, cause of recent insights regarding the role of several secreted integrating the growth of the ureteric system with tubulogen- molecules in tubulogenesis, it has become necessary to revise esis. The developmental biologic processes of the kidney have been logenesis. The conclusion drawn from this discovery was that the subject of intense study for more than 100 yr (for review, the ureteric bud induces tubulogenesis within the surrounding see reference (1). All three vertebrate kidney types (pro- mesenchyme. During further investigation, it was discovered nephros, mesonephros, and metanephros) are derivatives of a that a number of tissues, including, most notably, a dorsal region of the embryo known as the intermediate mesoderm. In portion of the embryonic spinal cord, are able to substitute for mice, a portion of the mesonephric duct, known as the meta- the ureter in this inductive interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • 140503 IPF Signatures Supplement Withfigs Thorax
    Supplementary material for Heterogeneous gene expression signatures correspond to distinct lung pathologies and biomarkers of disease severity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Daryle J. DePianto1*, Sanjay Chandriani1⌘*, Alexander R. Abbas1, Guiquan Jia1, Elsa N. N’Diaye1, Patrick Caplazi1, Steven E. Kauder1, Sabyasachi Biswas1, Satyajit K. Karnik1#, Connie Ha1, Zora Modrusan1, Michael A. Matthay2, Jasleen Kukreja3, Harold R. Collard2, Jackson G. Egen1, Paul J. Wolters2§, and Joseph R. Arron1§ 1Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, CA 2Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 3Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA ⌘Current address: Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Emeryville, CA. #Current address: Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA. *DJD and SC contributed equally to this manuscript §PJW and JRA co-directed this project Address correspondence to Paul J. Wolters, MD University of California, San Francisco Department of Medicine Box 0111 San Francisco, CA 94143-0111 [email protected] or Joseph R. Arron, MD, PhD Genentech, Inc. MS 231C 1 DNA Way South San Francisco, CA 94080 [email protected] 1 METHODS Human lung tissue samples Tissues were obtained at UCSF from clinical samples from IPF patients at the time of biopsy or lung transplantation. All patients were seen at UCSF and the diagnosis of IPF was established through multidisciplinary review of clinical, radiological, and pathological data according to criteria established by the consensus classification of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS), Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS), and the Latin American Thoracic Association (ALAT) (ref. 5 in main text). Non-diseased normal lung tissues were procured from lungs not used by the Northern California Transplant Donor Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Exome Sequencing in Families at High Risk for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Identification of a Predisposing Mutation in the KDR Gene
    Hodgkin Lymphoma SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX Whole exome sequencing in families at high risk for Hodgkin lymphoma: identification of a predisposing mutation in the KDR gene Melissa Rotunno, 1 Mary L. McMaster, 1 Joseph Boland, 2 Sara Bass, 2 Xijun Zhang, 2 Laurie Burdett, 2 Belynda Hicks, 2 Sarangan Ravichandran, 3 Brian T. Luke, 3 Meredith Yeager, 2 Laura Fontaine, 4 Paula L. Hyland, 1 Alisa M. Goldstein, 1 NCI DCEG Cancer Sequencing Working Group, NCI DCEG Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Stephen J. Chanock, 5 Neil E. Caporaso, 1 Margaret A. Tucker, 6 and Lynn R. Goldin 1 1Genetic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD; 2Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD; 3Ad - vanced Biomedical Computing Center, Leidos Biomedical Research Inc.; Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD; 4Westat, Inc., Rockville MD; 5Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD; and 6Human Genetics Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA ©2016 Ferrata Storti Foundation. This is an open-access paper. doi:10.3324/haematol.2015.135475 Received: August 19, 2015. Accepted: January 7, 2016. Pre-published: June 13, 2016. Correspondence: [email protected] Supplemental Author Information: NCI DCEG Cancer Sequencing Working Group: Mark H. Greene, Allan Hildesheim, Nan Hu, Maria Theresa Landi, Jennifer Loud, Phuong Mai, Lisa Mirabello, Lindsay Morton, Dilys Parry, Anand Pathak, Douglas R. Stewart, Philip R. Taylor, Geoffrey S. Tobias, Xiaohong R. Yang, Guoqin Yu NCI DCEG Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory: Salma Chowdhury, Michael Cullen, Casey Dagnall, Herbert Higson, Amy A.
    [Show full text]