DOCSLIB.ORG

Electrolyte Solutions: Thermodynamics, Crystallization, Separation Methods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Electrolyte Solutions: Thermodynamics, Crystallization, Separation Methods Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 06, 2021 Electrolyte Solutions: Thermodynamics, Crystallization, Separation methods Thomsen, Kaj Link to article, DOI: 10.11581/dtu:00000073 Publication date: 2009 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Thomsen, K. (2009). Electrolyte Solutions: Thermodynamics, Crystallization, Separation methods. https://doi.org/10.11581/dtu:00000073 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Electrolyte Solutions: Thermodynamics, Crystallization, Separation methods 2009 Kaj Thomsen, Associate Professor, DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark [email protected] 1 List of contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5 2 CONCENTRATION UNITS ............................................................................................... 6 3 IDEAL SOLUTIONS ............................................................................................................ 9 3.1 DEFINITION 9 COLLIGATIVE PROPERTIES 13 4 CHEMICAL POTENTIAL AND ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS .................................. 16 4.1 CHEMICAL POTENTIAL 16 4.2 EXCESS CHEMICAL POTENTIALS FOR REAL SOLUTIONS 16 4.3 THE RATIONAL, UNSYMMETRICAL ACTIVITY COEFFICIENT 17 4.4 THE MOLALITY ACTIVITY COEFFICIENT 18 4.5 THE MOLARITY ACTIVITY COEFFICIENT 19 4.6 THE ACTIVITY OF SPECIES 20 4.7 CHEMICAL POTENTIAL OF A SALT 20 5 MEASUREMENT OF CHEMICAL POTENTIALS IN SALT SOLUTIONS ............. 23 5.1 MEASUREMENT OF THE CHEMICAL POTENTIALS OF IONS 23 5.2 THE NERNST EQUATION 24 5.3 THE HARNED CELL 25 5.4 MEASUREMENT OF SOLVENT ACTIVITY 27 5.4.1 FREEZING POINT DEPRESSION AND BOILING POINT ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS ................ 27 5.4.2 VAPOR PRESSURE METHODS ................................................................................................. 28 5.4.3 ISOPIESTIC MEASUREMENTS .................................................................................................. 29 5.5 OSMOTIC COEFFICIENT 30 5.5.1 THE VALUE OF THE OSMOTIC COEFFICIENT AT INFINITE DILUTION ...................................... 31 5.6 MEAN ACTIVITY COEFFICIENT FROM OSMOTIC COEFFICIENT 32 5.7 OSMOTIC PRESSURE 33 6 THERMODYNAMIC MODELS FOR ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS ..................... 35 6.1 ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS 35 6.1.1 DEBYE-HÜCKEL THEORY ...................................................................................................... 35 6.1.2 DEBYE-HÜCKEL EXTENDED LAW ......................................................................................... 37 6.1.3 DEBYE-HÜCKEL LIMITING LAW ............................................................................................ 39 6.1.4 THE HÜCKEL EQUATION ....................................................................................................... 40 6.1.5 THE BORN EQUATION ............................................................................................................ 42 6.1.6 THE MEAN SPHERICAL APPROXIMATION ............................................................................... 44 6.2 EMPIRICAL MODELS FOR INTERMEDIATE/SHORT RANGE INTERACTIONS 46 6.2.1 THE MEISSNER CORRELATION .............................................................................................. 46 6.2.2 BROMLEY’S METHOD ............................................................................................................ 48 6.2.3 THE PITZER METHOD ............................................................................................................. 50 2 6.3 INTERMEDIATE/SHORT RANGE INTERACTIONS FROM LOCAL COMPOSITION MODELS 54 6.3.1 THE EXTENDED UNIQUAC MODEL ..................................................................................... 54 6.3.2 THE ELECTROLYTE NRTL MODEL ........................................................................................ 57 6.4 INTERMEDIATE/SHORT RANGE INTERACTIONS FROM EQUATIONS OF STATE 58 6.4.1 FUGACITY COEFFICIENTS AND ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS ....................................................... 58 6.4.2 THE FÜRST AND RENON EQUATION OF STATE ...................................................................... 60 6.4.3 THE WU AND PRAUSNITZ EQUATION OF STATE .................................................................... 60 6.4.4 THE MYERS-SANDLER-WOOD EQUATION OF STATE ............................................................ 61 6.4.5 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EQUATIONS OF STATE .................................................................. 61 7 EQUILIBRIUM CALCULATIONS ................................................................................. 63 7.1 SPECIATION EQUILIBRIUM 63 7.2 SOLID-LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM 64 7.2.1 SATURATION INDEX .............................................................................................................. 65 7.3 VAPOR-LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM 65 7.3.1 HENRY’S CONSTANT ............................................................................................................. 66 7.4 LIQUID-LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM 67 7.5 COMPOSITION DEPENDENCE OF EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS 68 7.6 TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS 71 7.7 PRESSURE DEPENDENCE OF EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS 72 7.7.1 THE PRESSURE DEPENDENCE OF ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS .................................................... 73 8 THERMAL AND VOLUMETRIC PROPERTIES ......................................................... 75 8.1 PARTIAL AND APPARENT MOLAR PROPERTIES 75 8.2 THERMAL PROPERTIES 75 8.2.1 HEAT OF DILUTION ................................................................................................................ 78 8.2.2 HEAT OF SOLUTION ............................................................................................................... 78 8.2.3 MEASUREMENT OF HEATS OF DILUTION AND SOLUTION ...................................................... 80 8.2.4 MEASUREMENT OF HEAT CAPACITY ..................................................................................... 82 8.3 VOLUMETRIC PROPERTIES 84 9 PHASE DIAGRAMS .......................................................................................................... 90 9.1 PHASE RULE AND INVARIANT POINTS 90 9.2 BINARY PHASE DIAGRAM 90 9.3 TERNARY PHASE DIAGRAM 92 9.4 QUATERNARY SYSTEMS 94 10 CRYSTALLIZATION........................................................................................................ 98 10.1 SUPERSATURATION 98 10.2 THE KELVIN EQUATION FOR NUCLEATION 99 10.3 ACTIVATION ENERGY FOR CRYSTAL FORMATION 101 10.4 PRIMARY NUCLEATION RATE 101 11 FRACTIONAL CRYSTALLIZATION .......................................................................... 102 3 11.1 PRODUCTION OF KNO3 105 11.2 OPTIMIZATION OF FRACTIONAL CRYSTALLIZATION PROCESSES 107 11.3 SIMULATION OF K2SO4 PRODUCTION PROCESS 108 4 1 Introduction Phase equilibria with systems containing electrolytes are of great importance. A few examples may illustrate this: Production of fertilizers and salts is often performed by precipitation of pure solids from multi component ionic solutions. Scaling in heat exchangers is caused by some salts for which the solubility decrease with increasing temperature. Scaling in oil production and in geothermal heat production is caused by some salts for which the solubility decrease with decreasing pressure and decreasing temperature. Solubility of gases in electrolyte solutions is of importance in many pollution abatement processes. The influence of salts on the vapor pressure of aqueous solutions of organic material may be important for the proper choice of a separation process. Salts may even introduce a liquid- liquid phase splitting in aqueous solutions of organic substances. Electrolytes dissociate into ions when they are dissolved in polar solvents like water or alcohols. A strong electrolyte will dissociate completely while a weak electrolyte will only dissociate partly. The presence of the charged ions causes the electrolyte solution to deviate much more from ideal solution behavior than a non-electrolyte solution does. This is the case even at very low electrolyte concentrations. The reason is that the ions interact with electrostatic forces which are of much longer range than those involved in the interaction of neutral molecules. This effect is stronger the greater the charge on the ions. For a proper description of electrolyte solutions not only the short range energetic interactions but also the long range electrostatic interactions have to be considered. Another basic difference between electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions is the constraint of electro- neutrality on electrolyte solutions. Because of this constraint, a system consisting of water and two ions is a binary system: The concentrations of the two ions cannot be chosen independently so the system has two
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prediction of Osmotic Coefficients by Pair Correlation Function Method" (1991)
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Digital Commons @ NJIT Dissertations Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 1-31-1991 Thermodynamics of strong electrolyte solutions : prediction of osmotic coefficientsy b pair correlation function method One Kwon Rim New Jersey Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/dissertations Part of the Chemical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Rim, One Kwon, "Thermodynamics of strong electrolyte solutions : prediction of osmotic coefficients by pair correlation function method" (1991). Dissertations. 1145. https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/dissertations/1145 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ NJIT. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ NJIT. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Properties of 1:1 Salt Aqueous Solutions with the Electrolattice M
    D o s s i e r This paper is a part of the hereunder thematic dossier published in OGST Journal, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 187-396 and available online here Cet article fait partie du dossier thématique ci-dessous publié dans la revue OGST, Vol. 68, n°2, pp. 187-396 et téléchargeable ici © Photos: IFPEN, Fotolia, X. DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2012094 DOSSIER Edited by/Sous la direction de : Jean-Charles de Hemptinne InMoTher 2012: Industrial Use of Molecular Thermodynamics InMoTher 2012 : Application industrielle de la thermodynamique moléculaire Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, Vol. 68 (2013), No. 2, pp. 187-396 Copyright © 2013, IFP Energies nouvelles 187 > Editorial électrostatique ab initio X. Rozanska, P. Ungerer, B. Leblanc and M. Yiannourakou 217 > Improving the Modeling of Hydrogen Solubility in Heavy Oil Cuts Using an Augmented Grayson Streed (AGS) Approach 309 > Improving Molecular Simulation Models of Adsorption in Porous Materials: Modélisation améliorée de la solubilité de l’hydrogène dans des Interdependence between Domains coupes lourdes par l’approche de Grayson Streed Augmenté (GSA) Amélioration des modèles d’adsorption dans les milieux poreux R. Torres, J.-C. de Hemptinne and I. Machin par simulation moléculaire : interdépendance entre les domaines J. Puibasset 235 > Improving Group Contribution Methods by Distance Weighting Amélioration de la méthode de contribution du groupe en pondérant 319 > Performance Analysis of Compositional and Modified Black-Oil Models la distance du groupe For a Gas Lift Process A. Zaitseva and V. Alopaeus Analyse des performances de modèles black-oil pour le procédé d’extraction par injection de gaz 249 > Numerical Investigation of an Absorption-Diffusion Cooling Machine Using M.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Lithium Brine Water? (Desalination)
    Desalination xxx (xxxx) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Desalination journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/desal Is lithium brine water? Mojtaba Ejeian a, Alexander Grant b, Ho Kyong Shon c, Amir Razmjou c,* a Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Engineering Research Center of Solar Energy (MOE China), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China b Principal, Jade Cove Partners, San Francisco, California, United States of America c Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia HIGHLIGHTS • The rapid expansion of applications of Lithium-ion batteries has raised Li demand. • Overexploitation of Li brine resources such as Salar de Atacama raised concerns. • There is an ongoing debate over the definition of Lithium brine as water or minerals. • The debate has frustrated basic measures for moving towards a sustainable operation. • Here, we used a molecular level approach to prove that the brine is a type of water. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: With the development of light and rechargeable batteries for electric vehicles, global demand for lithium has Lithium increased considerably in recent years. This has drawn more attention to how lithium is produced, especially on Brine primary extraction operations such as those at the Salar de Atacama in Northern Chile. There are concerns that Lithium Ion Batteries brine extraction at the Atacama could irreversibly damage the basin's complex hydrological system. However, Electric Vehicles differing opinions over the definition of water have frustrated basic action measures for minimizing impacts of Hydrogeology Resource Extraction operations like these. Some lithium industry stakeholders have historically described brine as a mineral, while Molecular Dynamics others emphasize that brine is also a type of water in a complex network of different water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The S-Block Elements of the Periodic Table Are Those in Which the Last Electron Enters the Outermost S-Orbital
    Chapter-10 The s-block elements The s-block elements: The s-block elements of the Periodic Table are those in which the last electron enters the outermost s-orbital. The s-orbital can accommodate only two electrons, two groups (1 & 2) belong to the s- block of the Periodic Table. Group 1 elements: alkali metals Lithium Li Sodium Na Potassium K Rubidium Rb Caesium Cs Francium. Fr Why they are known as alkali metals? They are collectively known as the alkali metals. These are so called because they form hydroxides on reaction with water which are strongly alkaline in nature. Electronic Configuration The general electronic configuration of alkali elements is [noble gas] ns1 Lithium Li 1s22s1 or [He]2s1 Sodium Na 1s22s22p63s1or [Ne] 3s1 Potassium K 1s22s22p63s23p64s1 or [Ar]4s1 Rubidium Rb 1s22s22p63s23p63d104s24p65s1or [Kr]5s1 Caesium Cs 1s22s22p63s23p63d104s2 4p64d105s25p66s1 or [Xe] 6s1 Francium. Fr [Rn]7s1 Occurrence: Sodium and potassium are abundant and lithium, rubidium and caesium have much lower abundances. Francium is highly radioactive; its longest-lived isotope 223Fr has a half-life of only 21 minutes. All the alkali metals have one valence electron, ns1 outside the noble gas core. The loosely held s-electron in the outermost valence shell of these elements makes them the most electropositive metals. They readily lose electron to give monovalent M+ ions. Hence,they are never found in free state in nature. Atomic and Ionic Radii The alkali metal atoms have the largest sizes in a particular period of the periodic table. Withincrease in atomic number, the atom becomes larger. The monovalent ions (M+) are smaller than the parent atom.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Characterization of Thermochemical Materials Based on Salt Hydrates and Salt Alcoholates
    Development and characterization of thermochemical materials based on salt hydrates and salt alcoholates Von der Fakultät Nachhaltigkeit der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg zur Erlangung des Grades Doktorin der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl.-Ing. Kathrin Korhammer geboren am 04.03.1984 in Altötting November 2018 Eingereicht am: 29.11.2018 Mündliche Verteidigung (Disputation) am: 24.02.2020 Erstbetreuer und Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang K. L. Ruck Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Oliver Opel Drittgutachter: Prof. Dr. Frédéric Kuznik Die einzelnen Beiträge des kumulativen Dissertationsvorhabens sind oder werden wie folgt veröffentlicht: I Fopah Lele A, Korhammer K, Wegscheider N, Rammelberg HU, Osterland T, Ruck W. Thermal conductivity measurement of salt hydrate as porous material using calorimetric (DSC) method. 8th World Conference on Experimental Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics (ExHFT), Lisboa, Portugal: A. Faria - Edicao Electronica Lda.; 2013. II Druske M-M, Fopah-Lele A, Korhammer K, Rammelberg HU, Wegscheider N, Ruck W, et al. Developed materials for thermal energy storage: Synthesis and characterization. Energy Procedia 2014;61:96–9. III Korhammer K, Druske M-M, Fopah-Lele A, Rammelberg HU, Wegscheider N, Opel O, et al. Sorption and thermal characterization of composite materials based on chlorides for thermal energy storage. Applied Energy 2016;162:1462–72. IV Korhammer K, Apel C, Osterland T, Ruck WKL. Reaction of calcium chloride and mag- nesium chloride and their mixed salts with ethanol for thermal energy storage. Energy Procedia 2016;91:161–71. V Korhammer K, Mihály J, Bálint S, Trif L, Vass Á, Tompos A, et al. Reversible formation of alcohol solvates and their potential use for heat storage.
    [Show full text]
  • CH. 9 Electrolyte Solutions
    CH. 9 Electrolyte Solutions 9.1 Activity Coefficient of a Nonvolatile Solute in Solution and Osmotic Coefficient for the Solvent As shown in Ch. 6, the chemical potential is 0 where i is the chemical potential in the standard state and is a measure of concentration. For a nonvolatile solute, its pure liquid is often not a convenient standard state because a pure nonvolatile solute cannot exist as a liquid. For the dissolved solute, * i is the chemical potential of i in a hypothetical ideal solution at unit concentration (i = 1). In the ideal solution i = 1 for all compositions In real solution, i 1 as i 0 A common misconception: The standard state for the solute is the solute at infinite dilution. () At infinite dilution, the chemical potential of the solute approaches . Thus, the standard state should be at some non-zero concentration. A standard state need not be physically realizable, but it must be well- defined. For convenience, unit concentration i = 1 is used as the standard state. Three composition scales: Molarity (moles of solute per liter of solution, ci) The standard state of the solute is a hypothetical ideal 1-molar solution of i. (c) In real solution, i 1 as ci 0 Molality (moles of solute per kg of solvent, mi) // commonly used for electrolytes // density of solution not needed The standard state is hypothetical ideal 1-molal solution of i. (m) In real solution, i 1 as mi 0 Mole fraction xi Molality is an inconvenient scale for concentrated solution, and the mole fraction is a more convenient scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Application to the Lithium Ionic Electrolyte Systems with Excess Gibbs Energy Model Including Solvation
    Application to the Lithium ionic Electrolyte Systems with Excess Gibbs Energy Model including Solvation Sung Bin Park, Chul Soo Lee Dept. of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Korea University Thermodynamics & Properties Lab. Scheme Introduction Theoretical Background Results Conclusion Thermodynamics & Properties Lab. Introduction Aqueous Electrolyte Solution A wide variety of important chemical processes Wastewater treatment, extractive distillation, solution crystallization, desalination, gas scrubbing etc. Previous Models GE Model Debye-Hückel (1923), Bromley (1973), Pitzer (1973) Meissner & Tester (1972), Chen et al. (1982) Primitive Model Wasman et al. (1972), Blum (1975), Harvey et al. (1989), Taghikhani et al. (2000) Nonprimitive Model Planche et al. (1981), Ball et al. (1985), Fürst et al. (1993), Zuo et al. (1998) Acceptable accuracy up to I=6.0 or less Thermodynamics & Properties Lab. Hydration Theory GE model Ghosh and Patwardhan (1990) Based on lithium chrolide as a reference electrolyte Hydration energy, function of the total moles of water hydrated per kg of solution Up to I=24 for 150 electrolyte solutions Schoenert (1990, 1991,1993, 1994) Modified hydration model of Robinson and Stokes Transfer of water to the hydration spheres of ions Up to m=1 for HCl,LiCl,NaCl,KCl,CsCl,NH4Cl,NaBr Thermodynamics & Properties Lab. Hydration Model SAFT Approach Gil-Villegas et al. (2001) Ionic contribution : MSA Solvent-solvent, solvent-ion, ion-ion pairing Applied to the NaCl solution up to 10 m Paricaud et al. (2001) Applied to the NaOH solution up to 22 m In present work Solvation contribution from the Veytsman statistics Explicitly added to Lee et al. model Application to LiCl, LiBr, LiI and LiClO4 solutions Thermodynamics & Properties Lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into the Potential of Mgso4 for Interseasonal Domestic Thermochemical Energy Storage
    Investigation into the potential of MgSO4 for interseasonal domestic thermochemical energy storage By Daniel Mahon Doctoral Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University June 2018 © by Daniel Mahon 2018 I I. Abstract Approximately 26% of the UK’s primary energy consumption is used specifically for Domestic Space Heating (DSH) and Domestic Hot Water (DHW) production [1]. The majority of this, 88%, comes directly from gas and oil with only 2% coming from renewable energy sources [1]. Decarbonising DSH and DHW represents a huge challenge for the UK’s government which is targeting a reduction of CO2 emissions of 80% by 2050 [2]. The amount of energy utilised from renewable sources can be increased by effective Thermal Energy Storage (TES). In a domestic environment thermal energy is typically required when the energy supplied from renewable sources is low (i.e. thermal energy demand is high in the winter and low in the summer), interseasonal Thermochemical Energy Storage (TCES) offers a solution to this problem. TCES has the ability to store thermal energy from the summer months within chemical bonds and release the stored heat when required with heat losses of only around 15%. 3 Magnesium sulphate heptahydrate (MgSO4.7H2O) has the potential to store 2.8GJ/m of energy, is a low cost, non-toxic, safe material that can be dehydrated to MgSO4.0.1H2O (fully charged) at 150˚C making it suitable for domestic integration. Research has shown that when MgSO4 is used for TCES it suffers from problematic issues such as agglomeration.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedman's Excess Free Energy and the Mcmillan–Mayer Theory Of
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 105–113, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/PAC-CON-12-05-08 © 2012 IUPAC, Publication date (Web): 29 December 2012 Friedman’s excess free energy and the McMillan–Mayer theory of solutions: Thermodynamics* Juan Luis Gómez-Estévez Departament de Física Fonamental, Facultat de Física, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, E-08028, Barcelona, Spain Abstract: In his version of the theory of multicomponent systems, Friedman used the anal- ogy which exists between the virial expansion for the osmotic pressure obtained from the McMillan–Mayer (MM) theory of solutions in the grand canonical ensemble and the virial expansion for the pressure of a real gas. For the calculation of the thermodynamic properties of the solution, Friedman proposed a definition for the “excess free energy” that is a reminder of the ancient idea for the “osmotic work”. However, the precise meaning to be attached to his free energy is, within other reasons, not well defined because in osmotic equilibrium the solution is not a closed system and for a given process the total amount of solvent in the solu- tion varies. In this paper, an analysis based on thermodynamics is presented in order to obtain the exact and precise definition for Friedman’s excess free energy and its use in the compar- ison with the experimental data. Keywords: excess functions; free energy; Friedman; McMillan–Mayer; osmotic pressure; theory of solutions. INTRODUCTION The McMillan–Mayer (MM) theory of solutions [1–6] is a general theory that was originally formu- lated within the context of the grand canonical ensemble.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Identification
    RPP-RPT-50703 Rev.01A 8/23/2016 - 10:10 AM 1 of 77 Release Stamp DOCUMENT RELEASE AND CHANGE FORM Prepared For the U.S. Department of Energy, Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management By Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC., PO Box 850, Richland, WA 99352 Contractor For U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 DATE: TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. Printed in the United States of America. Aug 23, 2016 1. Doc No: RPP-RPT-50703 Rev. 01A 2. Title: Development of a Thermodynamic Model for the Hanford Tank Waste Simulator (HTWOS) 3. Project Number: ☒ N/A 4. Design Verification Required: ☐ Yes ☒ No 5. USQ Number: ☒ N/A 6. PrHA Number Rev. ☒ N/A Clearance Review Restriction Type: public 7. Approvals Title Name Signature Date Checker CREE, LAURA H CREE, LAURA H 08/16/2016 Clearance Review RAYMER, JULIA R RAYMER, JULIA R 08/23/2016 Document Control Approval MANOR, TAMI MANOR, TAMI 08/23/2016 Originator BRITTON, MICHAEL D BRITTON, MICHAEL D 08/16/2016 Quality Assurance DELEON, SOSTEN O DELEON, SOSTEN O 08/16/2016 Responsible Manager CREE, LAURA H CREE, LAURA H 08/16/2016 8. Description of Change and Justification Updated the reduced chemical potential coefficient vlaues for Na2SO4 and Na2SO4·10H2O in Table A.1, as the original values were incorrect.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydration Energy Alkali Metal Alkaline Earth Metals
    2- H2O2 changes Cr2O7 ion to CrO5 in an acidic medium, the oxidation state of Cr in CrO5 is (a) +6 (b) +5 (c) -10 (d) +3 Ques) Write balanced chemical equation for the following reaction: – (i) Permanganate ion (MnO4 ) reacts with sulphur dioxide gas in acidic medium to produce Mn2+ and hydrogensulphate ion. Chandni Prince kumar Khushi jha Chanduchandana Chandana s block elements General properties Configuration & Physical state Alkali Alkaline earth Metal metals ● 1 e- in outermost shell ● 2e- in outermost shell ● General formulas ns1 ● General formula ns2 ● All are silvery white ● All are greyish white ● Light soft, malleable ● These are harder than and ductile metals with alkali metals metallic lustre Atomic size Alkali Alkaline earth Metal metals ● Biggest in their ● Smaller than IA group respective period elements ● Size increases from Li ● Size increases to Fr du to addition of gradually from Be to an extra shell. Ra Li < Na < K < Rb < Cs < Be < Mg < Ca < Sr < Ba Fr Ionization potential Alkali Alkaline earth Metal metals ● First I.P. is very less ● First I.P. is higher than because of bigger IA group because of atomic size and only e- smaller atomic size in outermost shell. and completely filled s- orbital (stability) ● Second I.P. is very ● Second I.P. is lesser high because of than IA group. achieving inert gas configuration ● Order of I.P. ● Order of I.P. Li > Na > K > Rb > Cs Be > Mg > Ca > Sr > Ba (1st and 2nd I.P. (1st and 2nd I.P. difference > 16eV) difference < 11eV) Electropositive or metallic character Alkali Alkaline earth Metal metals ● electropositivity ● Their atomic size is ∝1/ionisation smaller than IA group so these are less ● Due to their larger ● Electropositivity size, electron can increases from Be and easily be removed to Ba form M+ ion.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Activity Coefficients of Aqueous Species 3.1. Introduction
    3. Activity Coefficients of Aqueous Species 3.1. Introduction The thermodynamic activities (ai) of aqueous solute species are usually defined on the basis of molalities. Thus, they can be described by the product of their molal concentrations (mi) and their γ molal activity coefficients ( i): γ ai = mi i (77) The thermodynamic activity of the water (aw) is always defined on a mole fraction basis. Thus, it can be described analogously by product of the mole fraction of water (xw) and its mole fraction λ activity coefficient ( w): λ aw = xw w (78) It is also possible to describe the thermodynamic activities of aqueous solutes on a mole fraction (x) basis. However, such mole fraction-based activities (ai ) are not the same as the more familiar (m) molality-based activities (ai ), as they are defined with respect to different choices of standard λ states. Mole fraction based activities and activity coefficients ( i), are occasionally applied to aqueous nonelectrolyte species, such as ethanol in water. In geochemistry, the aqueous solutions of interest almost always contain electrolytes, so mole-fraction based activities and activity co- efficients of solute species are little more than theoretical curiosities. In EQ3/6, only molality- (m) based activities and activity coefficients are used for such species, so ai always implies ai . Be- cause of the nature of molality, it is not possible to define the activity and activity coefficient of (x) water on a molal basis; thus, aw always means aw . Solution thermodynamics is a construct designed to approximate reality in terms of deviations from some defined ideal behavior.
    [Show full text]