Corporate Campaigns and the Nlrb: the Impact of Union Pressure on Job Creation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corporate Campaigns and the Nlrb: the Impact of Union Pressure on Job Creation CORPORATE CAMPAIGNS AND THE NLRB: THE IMPACT OF UNION PRESSURE ON JOB CREATION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EMPLOYMENT, LABOR AND PENSIONS COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, MAY 26, 2011 Serial No. 112–24 Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and the Workforce ( Available via the World Wide Web: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/committee.action?chamber=house&committee=education or Committee address: http://edworkforce.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 66–429 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE JOHN KLINE, Minnesota, Chairman Thomas E. Petri, Wisconsin George Miller, California, Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon, California Senior Democratic Member Judy Biggert, Illinois Dale E. Kildee, Michigan Todd Russell Platts, Pennsylvania Donald M. Payne, New Jersey Joe Wilson, South Carolina Robert E. Andrews, New Jersey Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Robert C. ‘‘Bobby’’ Scott, Virginia Bob Goodlatte, Virginia Lynn C. Woolsey, California Duncan Hunter, California Rube´n Hinojosa, Texas David P. Roe, Tennessee Carolyn McCarthy, New York Glenn Thompson, Pennsylvania John F. Tierney, Massachusetts Tim Walberg, Michigan Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Scott DesJarlais, Tennessee David Wu, Oregon Richard L. Hanna, New York Rush D. Holt, New Jersey Todd Rokita, Indiana Susan A. Davis, California Larry Bucshon, Indiana Rau´ l M. Grijalva, Arizona Trey Gowdy, South Carolina Timothy H. Bishop, New York Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania David Loebsack, Iowa Kristi L. Noem, South Dakota Mazie K. Hirono, Hawaii Martha Roby, Alabama Joseph J. Heck, Nevada Dennis A. Ross, Florida Mike Kelly, Pennsylvania Barrett Karr, Staff Director Jody Calemine, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EMPLOYMENT, LABOR AND PENSIONS DAVID P. ROE, Tennessee, Chairman Joe Wilson, South Carolina Robert E. Andrews, New Jersey Glenn Thompson, Pennsylvania Ranking Minority Member Tim Walberg, Michigan Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Scott DesJarlais, Tennessee David Loebsack, Iowa Richard L. Hanna, New York Dale E. Kildee, Michigan Todd Rokita, Indiana Rube´n Hinojosa, Texas Larry Bucshon, Indiana Carolyn McCarthy, New York Lou Barletta, Pennsylvania John F. Tierney, Massachusetts Kristi L. Noem, South Dakota David Wu, Oregon Martha Roby, Alabama Rush D. Holt, New Jersey Joseph J. Heck, Nevada Robert C. ‘‘Bobby’’ Scott, Virginia Dennis A. Ross, Florida (II) CONTENTS Page Hearing held on May 26, 2011 ............................................................................... 1 Statement of Members: Andrews, Hon. Robert E., ranking minority member, Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions ................................................. 4 Roe, Hon. David P., Chairman, Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions ...................................................................................... 1 Prepared statement of ............................................................................... 3 Wilson, Hon. Joe, a Representative in Congress from the State of South Carolina, prepared statement of .................................................................. 6 Statement of Witnesses: Bego, David A., president and CEO, Executive Management Services, Inc. ................................................................................................................. 7 Prepared statement of ............................................................................... 9 Fisk, Catherine L., chancellor’s professor of law, University of California, Irvine .............................................................................................................. 36 Prepared statement of ............................................................................... 38 Fritts, Jonathan C., partner, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP ...................... 45 Prepared statement of ............................................................................... 47 Karnas, F. Chet, president and owner, Lone Sun Builders, Inc., on behalf of Associated Builders and Contractors ...................................................... 26 Prepared statement of ............................................................................... 28 Additional Submissions: Mr. Andrews: Cincinnati Post article, ‘‘Justice for Janitors,’’ July 31, 2007 ................ 86 Indianapolis Star article, ‘‘Pay and Hours Improve for Indianapolis Janitors,’’ April 20, 2008 ....................................................................... 87 Indianapolis Clergy Committee, statement of principles ....................... 87 Executive Management Services, Inc., employee manual for hourly employees ............................................................................................... 91 Chairman Roe: Ritsema, Bill, president, Ritsema Associates: Prepared statement of ....................................................................... 76 Additional materials .......................................................................... 78 Questions submitted from Hon. Martha Roby, a Representative in Congress from the State of Alabama ................................................... 106 Response from Mr. Fritts to questions submitted .................................. 108 (III) CORPORATE CAMPAIGNS AND THE NLRB: THE IMPACT OF UNION PRESSURE ON JOB CREATION Thursday, May 26, 2011 U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions Committee on Education and the Workforce Washington, DC The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10:00 a.m., in room 2175, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Phil Roe [chairman of the subcommittee] presiding. Present: Representatives Roe, Wilson, Thompson, Walberg, DesJarlais, Hanna, Rokita, Bucshon, Noem, Andrews, Kucinich, Kildee, Hinojosa, Tierney, Holt, and Scott. Also Present: Representatives Kline, Gowdy, and Miller. Staff Present: Katherine Bathgate, Press Assistant/New Media Coordinator; Casey Buboltz, Coalitions and Member Services Coor- dinator; Ed Gilroy, Director of Workforce Policy; Benjamin Hoog, Legislative Assistant; Marvin Kaplan, Professional Staff Member; Barrett Karr, Staff Director; Ryan Kearney, Legislative Assistant; Brian Newell, Deputy Communications Director; Krisann Pearce, General Counsel; Molly McLaughlin Salmi, Deputy Director of Workforce Policy; Ken Serafin, Workforce Policy Counsel; Linda Stevens, Chief Clerk/Assistant to the General Counsel; Loren Sweatt, Professional Staff Member; Aaron Albright, Minority Com- munications Director for Labor; Kate Ahlgren, Minority Investiga- tive Counsel; Tylease Alli, Minority Hearing Clerk; Jody Calemine, Minority Staff Director; John D’Elia, Minority Staff Assistant; Brian Levin, Minority New Media Press Assistant; Jerrica Mathis, Minority Legislative Fellow, Labor; Richard Miller, Minority Senior Labor Policy Advisor; Megan O’Reilly, Minority General Counsel; Julie Peller, Minority Deputy Staff Director; and Meredith Regine, Minority Labor Policy Associate. Chairman ROE. A quorum being present, the Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions will come to order. Good morning, everyone. And welcome to our witnesses. And thank you for joining us today. Today, we will examine the role of the National Labor Relations Board in corporate campaigns. I realize this is a general definition of the term, but a corporate campaign is a union effort to disrupt the employer’s routine busi- (1) 2 ness. The campaign can take the form of negative advertising, com- plaints against employers with various government agencies, and can even include appeals to political and religious leaders to put pressure on a targeted employer. The intent of these tactics is to undermine the reputation as well as break the will of an employer who refuses to accept union de- mands. In some cases, an employer can either concede to the de- mands that may undermine the success of his or her business or accept public contempt, government penalties, outside interference, and extraordinary litigation costs. Regardless of the potential out- comes, these campaigns can have a detrimental impact on the busi- ness’ bottom line and threaten the livelihoods of its workers. Over the years, the use of corporate campaigns has accelerated. According to one study, between 1974 and 1999, only 200 corporate campaigns were identified. Yet, in 2005, it was estimated that be- tween 15 and 20 corporate campaigns were under way at any given time. And, recently, the NLRB has taken a number of steps to expand the arsenal of tactics available for a corporate campaign. The Board has removed bannering restrictions previously placed on boycotts of neutral employers. Employees of on-site contractors have been granted greater access to the property of the contracting employer connected to an organizing activity. The Board has also requested briefs that would allow even greater access to an employer’s prop- erty. In one case, the Board moved to uphold an election tainted by intimidation of workers because the intimidation originated with nonparties to the election. According to the Board’s logic, the out- come of an election can be overturned only when the threats by nonparties are ‘‘so aggravated as to create a general atmosphere
Recommended publications
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari of Fred J. Eychaner
    No. In the Supreme Court of the United States FRED J. EYCHANER, PETITIONER v. CITY OF CHICAGO, RESPONDENT ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI THOMAS GESELBRACHT KOSTA STOJILKOVIC DLA PIPER LLP Counsel of Record 444 West Lake Street, KIERAN GOSTIN Suite 900 XIAO WANG Chicago, IL 60606 MEGHAN CLEARY (312) 368-4094 WILKINSON STEKLOFF LLP thomas.geselbracht@ 2001 M St, N.W., 10th Floor dlapiper.com Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 847-4000 kstojilkovic@ wikinsonstekloff.com Counsel for Petitioner i QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Is the possibility of future blight a permissible ba- sis for a government to take property in an unblighted area and give it to a private party for private use? 2. Should the Court reconsider its decision in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005)? ii LIST OF ALL PARTIES The parties to the proceeding are Petitioner Fred J. Eychaner—the owner of the property in question—and Respondent City of Chicago. The proceedings that are directly related to the case are as follows: • City of Chicago v. Fred J. Eychaner & Un- known Owners, No. 1-19-1053, Appellate Court of Illinois. Opinion filed May 11, 2020. • City of Chicago v. Fred J. Eychaner & Un- known Owners, No. 1-13-1833, Appellate Court of Illinois. Opinion filed January 21, 2015. • City of Chicago v. Fred. J. Eychaner & Un- known Owners, No. 05-L-050792, Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. Judgment entered February 11, 2013, and December 26, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Legislative and Congressional Districts
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2011 Minnesota House and Senate Membership ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! A Rep. Dan Fabian-(R) A Rep. Steve Gottwalt-(R) A Rep. Duane Quam-(R) A Rep. Sarah Anderson-(R) A Rep. John Kriesel-(R) B Rep. Deb Kiel-(R) B Rep. King Banaian-(R) B Rep. Kim Norton-(DFL) B Rep. John Benson-(DFL) B Rep. Denny McNamara-(R) Sen. LeRoy A. Stumpf-(DFL) Sen. John Pederson-(R) Sen. David Senjem-(R) Sen. Terri Bonoff-(DFL) Sen. Katie Sieben-(DFL) ! 1 15 29 43 57 A Rep. Kent Eken-(DFL) A Rep. Sondra Erickson-(R) A Rep. Tina Liebling-(DFL) A Rep. Steve Simon-(DFL) A Rep. Joe Mullery-(DFL) B Rep. David Hancock-(R) B Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer-(R) B Rep. Mike Benson-(R) B Rep. Ryan Winkler-(DFL) B Rep. Bobby Joe Champion-(DFL) Sen. Rod Skoe-(DFL) Sen. Dave Brown-(R) Sen. Carla Nelson-(R) Sen. Ron Latz-(DFL) Sen. Linda Higgins-(DFL) 2 16 30 44 58 ! A Rep. Tom Anzelc-(DFL) A Rep. Kurt Daudt-(R) A Rep. Gene Pelowski Jr.-(DFL) A Rep. Sandra Peterson-(DFL) A Rep. Diane Loeffler-(DFL) B Rep. Carolyn McElfatrick-(R) B Rep. Bob Barrett-(R) B Rep. Gregory Davids-(R) B Rep. Lyndon Carlson-(DFL) B Rep. Phyllis Kahn-(DFL) ! ! ! Sen. Tom Saxhaug-(DFL) Sen. Sean Nienow-(R) Sen. Jeremy Miller-(R) Sen. Ann H. Rest-(DFL) Sen. Lawrence Pogemiller-(DFL) 2011 Legislati! ve and Congressional Districts 3 17 31 45 59 A Rep. John Persell-(DFL) A Rep. Ron Shimanski-(R) A Rep. Joyce Peppin-(R) A Rep. Michael Nelson-(DFL) A Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • American Title a Sociation ~ ~
    OFFICIAL PUBLICATION AMERICAN TITLE A SOCIATION ~ ~ VOUJME XXXVI JUNE, 1957 NUMBER 6 TITLE NEWS Official Publication of THE AMERICAN TITLE ASSOCIATION 3608 Guardian Building-Detroit 26, Michigan Volume XXXVI June, 1957 Number 6 Table of Contents Introduction-The Federal Highway Program ......... ... ................ .. .................... 2 J. E. Sheridan Highway Laws Relating to Controlled Access Roads ..... .. ....... ........... 6 Norman A. Erbe Title Companies and the Expanded Right of Way Problems ...... ............. .. 39 , Daniel W. Rosencrans Arthur A. Anderson Samuel J. Some William A . Thuma INTRODUCTION The Federal Highway Program J. E. SHERIDAN We are extremely grateful to Nor­ veloped its planning sufficiently to man A. Erbe, Attorney General of the show to the satisfaction of the dis­ State of Iowa, for permission to re­ trict engineer the effect of the pro­ print his splendid brief embracing posed construction upon adjace.nt the highway laws of various states property, the treatment of access con­ relating to the control in access roads. trol in the area of Federal acquisi­ Mr. Erbe originally presented this m tion, and that appropriate arrange­ narrative form before the convention ments have been made for mainte­ of the Iowa Title Association in May nance and supervision over the land of this year. As is readily ascertain­ to be acquired and held in the name able, this is the result of a compre­ of the United States pending transfer hensive study of various laws touch· of title and jurisdiction to the State ing on the incidents of highway regu­ or the proper subdivision thereof." lations. Additionally, we are privi­ It is suggested that our members leged to carry the panel discussion bring this quoted portion to the at­ of the American Right of Way Asso­ tention of officers of the Highway ciation Convention held in Chicago, Department and the office of its legal May 16 and 17, dealing with "Title division, plus the Office of the Attor­ Companies and the Expanded Right ney General within the members' ju­ of Way Problems".
    [Show full text]
  • “They Outlawed Solidarity!”*
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Seattle University School of Law: Digital Commons “They Outlawed Solidarity!”* Richard Blum** Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude . shall exist within the Unit- ed States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 984 I. LABOR RIGHTS AND THE PROHIBITION AGAINST INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE…………………………………………………………….987 II. SECONDARY STRIKES AND NLRA ANTISTRIKE INJUNCTIONS ......... 989 A. Statutory Law ............................................................................... 989 B. Scenarios ...................................................................................... 991 C. Remedies ...................................................................................... 994 III. NLRB CEASE AND DESIST ORDERS AGAINST UNIONS AND THEIR MEMBERS .............................................................................................. 994 IV. ANTISTRIKE INJUNCTIONS IMPLICATE THE THIRTEENTH AND FIRST AMENDMENTS EVEN IF WORKERS CAN PERMANENTLY QUIT THEIR JOBS .............................................................................................................. 998 A. Quitting Individually v. Quitting Collectively .............................. 998 B. Quitting En Masse v. Striking ....................................................... 999 C. Secondary Strikes and the Pollock Principle ............................. 1003 D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace Victor J
    Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal Volume 16 | Issue 1 Article 1 1998 Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace Victor J. Van Bourg Ellyn Moscowitz Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Van Bourg, Victor J. and Moscowitz, Ellyn (1998) "Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace," Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal: Vol. 16: Iss. 1, Article 1. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj/vol16/iss1/1 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Van Bourg and Moscowitz: Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placin HOFSTRA LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW JOURNAL Volume 16, No. 1 Fall 1998 ARTICLES SALTING THE MINES: THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PLACING PAID UNION ORGANIZERS IN THE EMPLOYER'S WORKPLACE* Victor J. Van Bourg** Ellyn Moscowitz*** Mr. Chairman .... Thank you for Mr. Chairman, I rise to strongly the opportunity to speak today. I oppose H.R. 3246, mistakenly am here to discuss the serious called the Fairness for Small Busi- * This article was made possible, in part, by a summer research grant from Chapman Uni- versity School of Law, while Ellyn Moscowitz was an Associate Professor of Law there.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Power of Nuisance Law: Labor Picketing and the Courts In
    Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 1998 Political Power of Nuisance Law: Labor Picketing and the Courts in Modern England, 1871-Present, The Rachel Vorspan Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Rachel Vorspan, Political Power of Nuisance Law: Labor Picketing and the Courts in Modern England, 1871-Present, The , 46 Buff. L. Rev. 593 (1998) Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/344 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BUFFALO LAW REVIEW VOLUME 46 FALL 1998 NUMBER 3 The Political Power of Nuisance Law: Labor Picketing and the Courts in Modern England, 1871-Present RACHEL VORSPANt INTRODUCTION After decades of decline, the labor movements in America and England are enjoying a resurgence. Unions in the United States are experiencing greater vitality and political visibility,' and in 1997 a Labour government took power in England for the first time in eighteen years.! This t Associate Professor of Law, Fordham University. A.B., 1967, University of California, Berkeley; M.A., 1968, Ph.D., 1975, Columbia University (English History); J.D., 1979, Harvard Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Scorecard 109Th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006
    IRANIAN AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE Congressional Scorecard 109th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006 Please visit us on the web at www.iranianamericanpac.org About IAPAC IAPAC is a registered bipartisan political action committee that contributes to candidates for public office who are attuned to the domestic concerns of the Iranian American community. IAPAC focuses exclusively on domestic policy issues such as civil rights and immigration, and it encourages Americans of Iranian descent to actively participate in civic affairs. Mission • To support and promote the election of candidates for federal, state and local office, regardless of party affiliation, who are attuned to the domestic needs and issues of the Iranian American community • To support and promote Iranian American participation in civic affairs Issue Advocacy Civil Liberties: Balancing Civil Liberties and National Security in the Post-9/11 Era. Protecting our security and ensuring that the government does not infringe upon basic constitutional rights have long been important issues for civil libertarians and certain ethnic communities. IAPAC believes that our government must take the appropriate measures to protect our nation from further atrocities, but that it can do so without eliminating basic constitutional rights. Immigration: Immigration reform that is driven by proper national security concerns and remedies based on a fair and accurate appraisal of deficiencies in the immigration process, and not simply on national origin. Specifically, IAPAC advocates for a fair and measured execution of federal regulations governing the issuance of non-immigrant and immigrant visas for Iranian nationals. Congressional Scorecard The IAPAC 2005-2006 Congressional Scorecard rates members of Congress on votes and other positions taken in the House of Representatives and the Senate in the 109th Congress, which affect the domestic needs of the Iranian American community.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G: Mailing List
    Appendix G: Mailing List Appendix G / Mailing List 187 Appendix G: Mailing List The following is an initial list of government offices, private organizations, and individuals who will receive notice of the availablity of this CCP. We continue to add to this list and expect to mail several thousand notices or summary CCPs. Elected Officials Sen. Mark Dayton Sen. Norm Coleman Rep. Jim Ramstad Rep. John Kline Rep. Mark Kennedy Rep. Betty McCollum Rep. Martin Sabo Rep. Collin Peterson Rep. Gil Gutknecht Gov. Tim Pawlenty Local Government City of Bloomington City of Arden Hills City of Eden Prairie City of Eagan City of Burnsville City of Savage City of Shakopee City of Chanhassen City of Chaska City of Carver City of Jordon Hennepin County Dakota County Carver County Scott County Sibley County Le Sueur County Rice County Waseca County Steel County Blue Earth County Nicollet County Ramsey County Appendix G / Mailing List 189 Washington County Chisago County Hennepin County Park District Metropolitan Airports Commission Hennepin County Soil and Water Conservation District Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District Sibley County Soil and Water Conservation District Le Sueur County Soil and Water Conservation District Rice County Soil and Water Conservation District Waseca County Soil and Water Conservation District Steel County Soil and Water Conservation District Blue Earth County Soil and Water Conservation District Nicollet County Soil
    [Show full text]
  • Going Karura Colliding Subjectivities and Labour Struggle in Nairobi's Gig Economy
    Going Karura Colliding subjectivities and labour struggle in Nairobi’s gig economy Gianluca Iazzolino Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa, Department of International Development, LSE Centre of Socio-legal Studies, University of Oxford [email protected] [email protected] Accepted: 23-Jun-2021 Abstract Based on an ethnography of Uber drivers in Nairobi, my article explores practices of contestation of the gig economy taking place both in the digital and physical space of the city. It argues that the labour struggle against the price policies and the control mechanisms of ride-hailing platforms like Uber foreground the tension between a subjectification from above, in which the platforms construct the drivers as independent contractors, and the shaping of subjectivities through the interaction of the drivers with the digital platforms and with one another. It also suggests that, through contestation, as the one catalysed by the call to ‘go Karura’, logging-off from the app, the workers connect their struggle to a broader critique of processes of exploitation, dependency and subalternity involving the state and international capital. While contributing to the growing literature on the gig economy in low and middle-income countries, my article brings the labour geography scholarship exploring how workers collectively shape economic spaces in conversation with the intellectual tradition of Italian Operaismo (Workerism). In doing so, it highlights the nexus of labour subjectivity and collective agency as mutually constitutive. Introduction On the morning of the 2nd July 2018, about a hundred vehicles converged at the main intersections in downtown Nairobi, grounding the rush-hour traffic of the Kenyan capital to a halt.
    [Show full text]
  • CHLA 2017 Annual Report
    Children’s Hospital Los Angeles Annual Report 2017 About Us The mission of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles is to create hope and build healthier futures. Founded in 1901, CHLA is the top-ranked children’s hospital in California and among the top 10 in the nation, according to the prestigious U.S. News & World Report Honor Roll of children’s hospitals for 2017-18. The hospital is home to The Saban Research Institute and is one of the few freestanding pediatric hospitals where scientific inquiry is combined with clinical care devoted exclusively to children. Children’s Hospital Los Angeles is a premier teaching hospital and has been affiliated with the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California since 1932. Table of Contents 2 4 6 8 A Message From the Year in Review Patient Care: Education: President and CEO ‘Unprecedented’ The Next Generation 10 12 14 16 Research: Legislative Action: Innovation: The Jimmy Figures of Speech Protecting the The CHLA Kimmel Effect Vulnerable Health Network 18 20 21 81 Donors Transforming Children’s Miracle CHLA Honor Roll Financial Summary Care: The Steven & Network Hospitals of Donors Alexandra Cohen Honor Roll of Friends Foundation 82 83 84 85 Statistical Report Community Board of Trustees Hospital Leadership Benefit Impact Annual Report 2017 | 1 This year, we continued to shine. 2 | A Message From the President and CEO A Message From the President and CEO Every year at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles is by turning attention to the hospital’s patients, and characterized by extraordinary enthusiasm directed leveraging our skills in the arena of national advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • NRCC: MN-07 “Vegas, Baby”
    NRCC: MN-07 “Vegas, Baby” Script Documentation AUDIO: Taxpayers pay for Colin Peterson’s Since 1991, Peterson Has Been Reimbursed At personal, private airplane when he’s in Minnesota. Least $280,000 For Plane Mileage. (Statement of Disbursements of House, Chief Administrative Officer, U.S. House of Representatives) (Receipts and Expenditures: Report of the Clerk of TEXT: Collin Peterson the House, U.S. House of Representatives) Taxpayers pay for Peterson’s private plane Statement of Disbursements of House AUDIO: But do you know where else he’s going? Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The Safari Club International From March AUDIO: That’s right. Vegas, Baby. Vegas. 22, 2002 To March 25, 2002 Costing, $1,614. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The American Federation Of Musicians From June 23, 2001 To June 25, 2001, Costing $919. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The Safari Club International From January 11, 2001 To January 14, 2001, Costing $918.33. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) AUDIO: Colin Peterson took 36 junkets. Vacation- Throughout His Time In Congress, Peterson like trips, paid for by special interest groups. Has Taken At Least 36 Privately Funded Trip Worth $57,942 (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) TEXT: 36 Junkets paid for by special interest groups See backup below Legistorm AUDIO: In Washington, Peterson took $6 million in Collin Peterson Took $6.7 Million In Campaign campaign money from lobbyists and special Money From Special Interest Group PACs interests.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E561 HON
    March 25, 2003 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E561 During this same time, Callahan won rave Muskegon Norsemen were ranked third in the during a time of national emergency. This reviews for his skills as a legislator, with The state after the regular season. SMCC was waiver authority addresses the need to assist Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post unranked most of the year before finally mak- students who are being called up to active praising on him as ‘‘an unlikely champion.’’ He ing No. 10 in the last week. duty or active service. later became the chairman of the influential During the regular season, the girls were This bill is specific in its intent—to ensure House Appropriations Subcommittee on En- known for their astonishing comebacks. In the that as a result of a war, military contingency ergy and Water Development in the 107th State final, the girls were down 9–0 in the first operation or a national emergency: Affected Congress. game before they embarked on their amazing borrowers of Federal student assistance are Mr. Speaker, Sonny Callahan was a dedi- comeback that will go down in state volleyball not in a worse financial position; administrative cated public servant and an honorable Ala- history. The team finished their remarkable requirements on affected individuals are mini- bamian. Let us take this time to reflect on his season with a 40–10–4 record. mized without affecting the integrity of the pro- work in this historic chamber and thank him Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask all my col- grams; current year income of affected individ- for his dedication to his country and the peo- leagues to rise and join me in congratulating uals may be used to determine need for pur- ple of Alabama.
    [Show full text]