DOCSLIB.ORG

ACOA Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency 001 AGR Agriculture And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buy er ID - Id de l'acheteur R000035089/A CFA Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME R000035089/A Annex A – Appendix B List of Clients Abbreviated Client Long Name Division Client Name Number ACOA Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency 001 AGR Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 003 APA Atlantic Pilotage Authority 004 ATSSC Administrative Tribunals Support Service of Canada 045 BC Bank of Canada 007 CANNOR Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency 214 CAS COURTS ADMINISTRATION SERVICE 012 CATSA CANADIAN AIR TRANSPORT SECURITY AUTHORITY 014 CBC Canadian Broadcasting Corporation 015 CBRDC COPYRIGHT BOARD CANADA 017 CBSA CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY 018 CC CANADA COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS 019 CCC Canadian Commercial Corporation 020 CCI CANADIAN CONSERVATION INSTITUTE 021 CCOHS Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety 022 CDC Canadian Dairy Commission 024 CDI Canada Development Investment Corporation 216 CDIC Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation 025 CEAA CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY 026 CFIA Canadian Food Inspection Agency 032 CGC Canadian Grain Commission 033 CH Canadian Heritage 035 CHARS Canadian High Arctic Research Station 057 CHIN Canadian Heritage Information Network 036 CHRC Canadian Human Rights Commission 038 CIC CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION CANADA 040 CICS Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat 041 CIHR Canadian Institutes of Health Research 044 CIPO CANADIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE 213 CLC Canada Lands Company Limited 049 CMH Canadian Museum of History 050 CMHC Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation 051 CMHR Canadian Museum for Human Rights 206 CMN Canadian Museum of Nature 052 CNL Canadian Nuclear Laboratories 002 CNSC Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 053 CP Canada Post Corporation 055 CPMA THE CANADIAN PARI-MUTUAL AGENCY 191 CRA Canada Revenue Agency 023 CRC COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH CENTRE 058 CRRF Canadian Race Relations Foundation 059 Page 1 of - de 4 Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buy er ID - Id de l'acheteur R000035089/A CFA Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME R000035089/A Annex A – Appendix B List of Clients Abbreviated Client Long Name Division Client Name Number CRTC Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission 060 CSC Correctional Service Canada 061 CSE Communication Security Establishment 222 CSIS Canadian Security Intelligence Service 063 CSPA Canadian Space Agency 065 CSPS CANADA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC SERVICE 066 CSTMC Canada Science and Technology Museums Corporation 134 CTA Canadian Transportation Agency 068 CTC CANADIAN TOURISM COMMISSION 069 CWB Canadian Wheat Board 070 DCC Defence Construction Canada 071 DRDC Defence R & D Canada 072 EC Environment Canada 074 ECBC Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation 075 EDACRQ Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of 027 Quebec EDC Export Development Canada 077 ELECTC Elections Canada 078 FAITC Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada 079 FBC The Federal Bridge Corporation Limited 080 FBDB Business Development Bank of Canada 081 FCAC Financial Consumer Agency of Canada 082 FCC Farm Credit Canada 083 FEDSO FEDERAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR SOUTHERN 215 ONTARIO FFMC Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation 085 FIN Finance Canada 086 FINTRAC Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada 087 FJA Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs 088 FO Fisheries and Oceans 089 GBC Government of British Columbia 225 GLP Great Lakes Pilotage Authority 090 H OF C House of Commons 096 HCAN Health Canada 097 HCORP Harbourfront Corporation 098 HRSDC HUMAN RESOURCES AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT CANADA 101 IAND Indian and Northern Affairs Canada 103 IC Industry Canada 104 IDRC International Development Research Centre 108 IJC International Joint Commission 109 INFRAC INFRASTRUCTURE CANADA 110 Page 2 of - de 4 Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buy er ID - Id de l'acheteur R000035089/A CFA Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME R000035089/A Annex A – Appendix B List of Clients Abbreviated Client Long Name Division Client Name Number INVPSP PUBLIC SECTOR PENSION INVESTMENT BOARD 198 IRB Immigration and Refugee Board 111 IRSR INDIAN RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS RESOLUTION OF CANADA 194 JUS Department of Justice Canada 113 LAC LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA 114 LP Library of Parliament 117 LPA Laurentian Pilotage Authority Canada 118 MA Marine Atlantic Limited 119 MGERC Military Grievances External Review Committee 030 MPCC Military Police Complaints Commission 121 NAC National Arts Centre 122 NATRES Natural Resources Canada 124 NBC National Battlefields Commission 126 NCC National Capital Commission 127 ND National Defence 128 NEB National Energy Board 129 NFB National Film Board 130 NFPC NATIONAL FARM PRODUCTS COUNCIL 131 NGC National Gallery of Canada 132 NPA Northern Pipeline Agency 136 NPB National Parole Board 137 NRC National Research Council Canada 138 NSERC Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 140 NSRS NATIONAL SEARCH AND RESCUE SECRETARIAT 141 OAG Office of the Auditor General of Canada 142 OCI Office of the Correctional Investigator 144 OCIEC Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner 192 OCOL Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages 146 OCSEC Office of the Communications Security Establishment 207 Commissioner ODPP Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions 205 OIPC Offices of the Information and Privacy Commissioners 147 OPMC OLD PORT OF MONTREAL CORP 211 OPSIC Office of the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner 204 ORL OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF LOBBYING OF CANADA 199 OSFI Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Cda 148 OSGG Office of the Secretary to the Governor General 149 PCA Parks Canada Agency 150 PCO Privy Council Office 151 PDP PARC DOWNSVIEW PARK INC 197 PHAC PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA 193 Page 3 of - de 4 Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buy er ID - Id de l'acheteur R000035089/A CFA Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME R000035089/A Annex A – Appendix B List of Clients Abbreviated Client Long Name Division Client Name Number PMRB Patented Medicine Prices Review Board 153 PO Passport Office 154 PPA Pacific Pilotage Authority Canada 155 PPP PPP Canada Inc. 212 PSC Public Service Commission 157 PSEPC PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CANADA 169 PWGSC Public Works and Government Services Canada 160 RCM Royal Canadian Mint 161 RCMP Royal Canadian Mounted Police 162 RCMPC Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP 163 RCMPR RCMP External Review Committee 164 RTI Ridley Terminals Inc 220 SC Statistics Canada 166 SCC Supreme Court of Canada 167 SEN The Senate 168 SIRC Security Intelligence Review Committee 170 SSC Shared Services Canada 221 SSHRC Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 173 STCC Standards Council of Canada 174 SWC Status of Women Office of the Coordinator 175 TB Treasury Board Secretariat 176 TC Transport Canada 177 TFC Telefilm Canada 179 TRCS INDIAN RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION 210 COMMISSION SECRETARIAT TSBC Transportation Safety Board of Canada 182 UNPC DND UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING 183 VAC Veterans Affairs Canada 184 WED Western Economic Diversification 186 Page 4 of - de 4 .
Recommended publications
  • Press Release

    Press Release

    PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Great Towers and landmarks worldwide unite in global show support for Australia on Jan. 26 TORONTO, Jan. 24 — The CN Tower, fellow members of the World Federation of Great Towers and landmarks around the world are uniting to raise awareness and show support for Australia as the country works to fight and recover from devastating wildfires. On the night of Australia’s national holiday, January 26, the CN Tower will be among many landmarks to light in the country’s national colours of green and gold. Still others plan to join in the effort through social media and online. To date, towers and landmarks that have confirmed their participation include: • The Berlin TV Tower, Berlin, Germany • Busan Tower, Jung Gu, Busan, South Korea • The Calgary Tower, Calgary, Canada • The CN Tower, Toronto, Canada • The Eiffel Tower, Paris, France • The Empire State Building, New York, USA • Euromast, Rotterdam, Netherlands • La Grande Roue, Montréal, Canada • N Seoul Tower, Seoul, South Korea • Niagara Falls, Niagara Falls, Canada/USA • One Liberty, Philadelphia, USA • The Reunion Tower, Dallas, USA • The Royal Liver Building, Liverpool, UK • The Shard, London, UK • SkyTower, Auckland, New Zealand • The Tokyo Tower, Tokyo, Japan • Toronto sign, Toronto, Canada • The Willis Tower, Chicago, USA “Australia is facing some of the worst wildfires ever seen. The scale of the ongoing crisis and its impact on the environment, people and wildlife concerns all of us around the world,” says Peter George, the CN Tower’s Chief Operating Officer. “Under the circumstances, we felt a global show of 1 support would be meaningful to many.
  • Partnership for Public Facilities and Infrastructure Act Guidelines Task Force Meeting Oct

    Partnership for Public Facilities and Infrastructure Act Guidelines Task Force Meeting Oct

    Partnership for Public Facilities and Infrastructure Act Guidelines Task Force Meeting Oct. 24, 2013 Meeting Agenda I. Introduction and Adoption of Minutes II. Staff Overview of House Bill 85 III. Presentation from the National Council on Public-Private Partnerships Mr. Rick Norment, Executive Director IV. Presentation from the Government of Canada Mr. Marc-Andre Hawkes, Consul and Sr. Trade Commissioner V. Presentation from the Florida School Boards Association Dr. Wayne Blanton, Executive Director Mr. Bill Graham VI. Presentation on Local Government Infrastructure Financing Mr. Randall C. Clement, Bryant Miller Olive VII. Panel discussion on Financing of Public-Private Partnerships Moderator: Mr. Lee Weintraub, Becker & Poliakoff Panelists: Mr. Lowell Clary, Clary Consulting Mr. Randall C. Clement, Bryant Miller Olive Mr. John Dionisio, Meridiam Infrastructure Mr. Chris Kinsley, Florida Board of Governors VIII. Presentation from the Florida Department of Transportation Mr. Leon Corbett, Project Finance Manager IX. Presentation from the Florida Association of Counties Mr. Chip Fletcher, County Attorney, Hillsborough County X. Presentation from the Florida League of Cities, Inc. Mr. Michael Parker, City of Tallahassee Mr. Kevin Crowder, Redevelopment Management Associates XI. Other Business and Public Testimony XII. Adjourn HB 85 Overview Partnership for Public Facilities and Infrastructure Guidelines Act Task Force October 24, 2013 Craig J. Nichols, Secretary HB 85 • HB 85, signed into law as Chapter 2013-223, Laws of Florida, authorizes public-private partnerships with responsible public entities. • The bill creates section 287.05712, F.S., to govern the procurement process for public- private partnerships for public purpose projects. • The bill creates the Partnership for Public Facilities and Infrastructure Act Guidelines Task Force.
  • Pursuit Wins Bid to Expand Flight Ride Experience to Toronto Brand New Attraction Showcasing Canada and Its People to Launch Near the Base of the CN Tower

    Pursuit Wins Bid to Expand Flight Ride Experience to Toronto Brand New Attraction Showcasing Canada and Its People to Launch Near the Base of the CN Tower

    IMMEDIATE RELEASE: JULY 25, 2019 Pursuit Wins Bid to Expand Flight Ride Experience to Toronto Brand new attraction showcasing Canada and its people to launch near the base of the CN Tower Vancouver (July 25, 2019) – Pursuit, part of Viad Corp (NYSE: VVI), announced today that it will expand its flight ride concept to Toronto. Modeled after Pursuit’s highly successful FlyOver attraction in Vancouver, the new FlyOver Canada location will provide guests with a brand-new flight ride experience featuring the country’s most iconic locations, picturesque landscapes and natural wonders. Following a competitive selection process undertaken by Canada Lands Company, a federal Crown corporation that specializes in real estate, development and attractions management, Pursuit has entered into a land lease with Canada Lands Company to build the new FlyOver Canada attraction near the base of Canada’s famed CN Tower. Construction on the new building is expected to begin in 2020, with an anticipated opening in early 2022 subject to standard City of Toronto approvals. “Through a visually stunning flight ride experience inside a soon-to-be-built landmark building, we will share the story of Canada and its people in an inspiring way that is accessible to everyone,” said Lisa Adams, Vice President, FlyOver Attractions by Pursuit. The new experience will feature a brand-new ride film showcasing Canada’s most awe-inspiring sights. The attraction will also include the creation of two immersive pre-ride experiences designed to share the unique spirit of Canada’s land and its people. “FlyOver Canada aligns with Canada Lands Company’s vision to celebrate the CN Tower precinct as a world-class tourism and entertainment destination, showcasing Canada at its best,” said John McBain, President and Chief Executive Officer, Canada Lands Company.
  • Sustainable Brownfields Redevelopment

    Sustainable Brownfields Redevelopment

    SUSTAINABLE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT by MICHELLE VlSlC B.Sc., University of Toronto. 1995 A thesis submitted in partial fuWillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF SCIENCE in ENVIRONMENT AND MANAGEMENT We accept this thesis as confoming to the required standard - - -- Harold Kenny - Canada Lands Company Steve Grundy - Royal Roads University ROYAL ROADS UNIVERSITY May 2000 O Michelle Visic, 2000 National Library Bibliothèque nationale of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wdlingtm Stieet 395. rue Welliigtm OîîawaON KlAW OnawaON KlAW Canada canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence ailowing the exclusive permettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seli reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/füm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. 1 thesis nor substantid extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT This study outlines and describes the best process to use in Brownfïelds Redevelopment, particularly fiom the perspective of stakeholder engagement. The purpose of the process is to guide companies, govemment, and communities in the planning and implementation of sustainable Brownfields Etedevelopment.
  • Downloads/P3%20Practice%20Guidelines %20May%202009.Pdf

    Downloads/P3%20Practice%20Guidelines %20May%202009.Pdf

    Transportation Association of Canada Synthesis of Practices for Implementing Public-Private Partnerships in Transportation Related Projects November 2012 DISCLAIMER The material presented in this text was carefully researched and presented. However, no warranty expressed or implied is made on the accuracy of the contents or their extraction from reference to publications; nor shall the fact of distribution constitute responsibility by TAC or any researchers or contributors for omissions, errors or pos- sible misrepresentations that may result from use of interpretation of the material con- tained herein. Copyright 2012 by Transportation Association of Canada 2323 St. Laurent Blvd. Ottawa, ON K1G 4J8 Tel. (613) 736-1350 ~ Fax (613) 736-1395 www.tac-atc.ca ISBN 978-1-55187-348-6 TAC REPORT DOCUMENTATION FORM Title and Subtitle Synthesis of Practices for Implementing Public-Private Partnerships in Transportation Related Projects Report Date Coordinating Agency and Address ITRD No. November 2012 Transportation Association of Canada 2323 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, ON K1G 4J8 Author(s) Corporate Affiliation(s) and Address(es) SNC Lavalin Transportation Association of Canada Abstract Keywords Canada is one of the leading practitioners of public-private partnerships (P3) in the Economics and Administration transportation sector. Some provinces have adopted this delivery format for Administration infrastructure including hospitals, municipal buildings and detention centres. More Construction recently, this format is increasingly used for larger transportation infrastructure Evaluation (Assessment) projects. Financing Highway As these larger infrastructure projects are completed, and as their operations and Public Private Partnership concessions begin and evolve, there are opportunities to determine if a project is Specifications successful during the implementation phase both for the public and the private side Textbook of the equation.
  • Heather Street Lands Joint-Venture Partnership Information Displays

    Heather Street Lands Joint-Venture Partnership Information Displays

    A HISTORIC PARTNERSHIP HEATHER STREET LANDS Canada Lands Company (CLC) together with a partnership of the Musqueam Indian Band, Squamish Nation and Tsleil-Waututh Nation (collectively the MST Partners) are excited to begin the public engagement stage of the City of Vancouver’s development approvals process. WORKING TOGETHER Canada Lands Company (CLC) and the MST Partners have entered into a historic joint-venture partnership, the first of its kind in Canada. The joint venture partnership owns three properties: the Heather Street Lands and Jericho Lands (former Department of National Defense property) in Vancouver, HEATHER STREET LANDS, VANCOUVER JERICHO LANDS, VANCOUVER MARINE DRIVE LANDS, WEST VANCOUVER and the Marine Drive Lands in West Vancouver. www.heatherstreetlands.ca “Canada Lands is incredibly proud of the work “This project is a great example of the growing role underway with our joint venture partner, the MST of First Nations in Vancouver and as key drivers in Partnership. This historic relationship demonstrates advancing the economy of British Columbia. The capacity for collaboration between a federal Crown Musqueam Indian Band is excited to work alongside corporation real estate company and Aboriginal the Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh Nations, the partners, not only here in Vancouver, but right across Federal and Provincial Governments, as well as local Canada” municipalities to create something that will benefit - John McBain the city and our members for generations.” Canada Lands Company - Chief Wayne Sparrow Musqueam Indian Band CANADA LANDS COMPANY HEATHER STREET LANDS CANADA LANDS COMPANY Canada Lands Company (CLC) is working with the MST Partners to bring new opportunities to the Heather Street Lands.
  • International Experiences on Government Land Development Companies: What Can Be Learned?

    International Experiences on Government Land Development Companies: What Can Be Learned?

    International Experiences on Government Land Development Companies: What Can Be Learned? Olga Kaganova IDG Working Paper No. 2011-01 February 2011 International Experiences on Government Land Development Companies: What Can Be Learned? Olga Kaganova February 2011 Abstract Governments of all levels in a number of countries have experimented with what can be called a government land development corporation. In the past twenty years, experimentations with this instrument of land management intensified, but their generalization and exchange of knowledge on the subject across borders is practically lacking. The paper attempts to start filling this void. It reviews ten case studies prepared specially for this purpose in a unified format and discusses similarities and differences among them, along with positive lessons and potential risks. Then, the paper outlines a “conceptual design” of a new corporation or, in other words, some guidance on which policy, governance, and business issues should be addressed before such a corporation is established. The annex presents the case studies. International Experiences on Government Land Development i Companies: What Can Be Learned? Olga Kaganova ii February 2011 1. Introduction In most countries, local (municipal) governments own or control large holdings of land and built- up properties, and, in addition, have the responsibility to provide local infrastructure services within their jurisdictions—from roads / streets, water and sewerage to social services such as schooling. Further, local economic development and urban regeneration are often considered an objective and responsibility of local governments as well. Establishing an organizational system that would manage government property assets and deploy them for achieving government objectives is one of the tasks of governmental asset management.
  • How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets

    How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets

    How to Engage with Public Disclosure Authorized the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Edward Farquharson Clemencia Torres de Mästle and E.R. Yescombe with Javier Encinas Public Disclosure Authorized How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets Edward Farquharson Clemencia Torres de Mästle and E.R. Yescombe with Javier Encinas © 2011 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved 1 2 3 4 14 13 12 11 This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Develop- ment / The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the govern- ments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any terri- tory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly.
  • The Federal Government's Intervention in the Development of Toronto's Central Waterfront Through the Harbourfront Corporation

    The Federal Government's Intervention in the Development of Toronto's Central Waterfront Through the Harbourfront Corporation

    STRAINED INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS, JURISDICTIONAL COMPLEXITY, AND POLITICAL POSTURING: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S INTERVENTION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF TORONTO'S CENTRAL WATERFRONT THROUGH THE HARBOURFRONT CORPORATION by Jill Valentina Sonego Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies, 2008 University of Calgary A Major Research Paper presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Planning In Urban Development Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010 PROPERTY OF RYERSON UNIVERSITY LIBRARY © Jill Sonego 2010 - c II , , Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this major research project. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this paper to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. -= Jill Valentina Sonego I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this paper by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. r I "p & - Jill Valentina Sonego iii STRAINED INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS, JURISDICTIONAL COMPLEXITY, AND POLITICAL POSTURING: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S INTERVENTION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF TORONTO'S CENTRAL WATERFRONT THROUGH THE HARBOURFRONT CORPORATION © Jill Sonego, 2010 Master of Planning in Urban Development Ryerson University ABSTRACT This paper explores the role that the federal government has played in the development of Toronto's central waterfront. Specifically, it focuses on the role and operation of the Harbourfront Corporation, a federally-owned organization that was charged with orchestrating the redevelopment of the central waterfront. This paper provides a brief history of Toronto's waterfront and an overview of the roles of the levels of government in Canada with respect to urban affairs and waterfront redevelopment.
  • PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS for TRANSPORTATION in the APEC REGION an Analysis and Literature Review

    PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS for TRANSPORTATION in the APEC REGION an Analysis and Literature Review

    PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR TRANSPORTATION IN THE APEC REGION An Analysis and Literature Review January 2017 This publication was produced by Nathan Associates Inc. for review by the United States Agency for International Development. PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR TRANSPORTATION IN THE APEC REGION An Analysis and Literature Review DISCLAIMER This document is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Its contents are the sole responsibility of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. GREAT WOMEN IN ASEAN INITIATIVE GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE CONTENTS Abbreviations i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii 1. Introduction 1 Working Definition of PPP 1 How this Report is Organized 2 2. Summary of Relevant APEC Policy Frameworks 3 The APEC Growth Strategy 3 The APEC Multiyear Plan on Infrastructure Development and Investment (MYPIDI), 2013–2016 4 Cebu Action Plan (CAP) 4 APEC Connectivity Blueprint (2015–2025) 5 Additional Initiatives Supported under APEC Forums 5 3. Objectives for Pursuing PPPs in APEC Economies 9 4. Gap Analysis of PPP Development 13 Factors in Success of a PPP 15 Conclusion 21 5. Case Studies: Transportation PPPs in the APEC Region 23 Port of Baltimore and the Seagirt Marine Terminal, USA 23 Airport Privatization, Mexico 26 Metro Rail Line 4, People’s Republic of China 28 Peninsula Link Project, Australia 30 General Conclusions and Lessons Learned 32 Works Cited 33 Appendix A: Economy-level Analyses on PPP Development 35 Australia 1 Brunei Darussalam 2 Canada 3 Chile 3 People’s Republic of China 4 Hong Kong, China 5 Indonesia 6 Japan 7 Republic of Korea 8 Malaysia 8 Mexico 9 New Zealand 10 Papua New Guinea 11 Peru 12 The Republic of the Philippines 12 Russia 14 Singapore 14 Chinese Taipei 15 Thailand 16 The United States 17 Viet Nam 18 Appendix A Works Cited 1 Appendix B: Websites Referenced vii INTRODUCTION V ILLUSTRATIONS Figures Figure 4-1.
  • Using Public-Private Partnerships to Improve Transportation Infrastructure in Canada by Charles Lammam, Hugh Macintyre, and Joseph Berechman

    Using Public-Private Partnerships to Improve Transportation Infrastructure in Canada by Charles Lammam, Hugh Macintyre, and Joseph Berechman

    Studies in Economic Prosperity May 2013 Using Public-Private Partnerships to Improve Transportation Infrastructure in Canada by Charles Lammam, Hugh MacIntyre, and Joseph Berechman Contents Executive summary / iii Introduction / 1 1 What are Public-Private Partnerships? / 3 2 The benefits of Public-Private Partnerships / 11 3 Common concerns about Public-Private Partnerships / 23 4 Conditions for successful Public-Private Partnerships / 31 5 Measuring the extent of transportation Public-Private Partnerships in Canada / 37 Conclusion / 44 Appendix A: Information on individual Canadian transportation P3s from 1985 to 2013 (as of Jan. 30) / 47 Appendix B: A description of PWF’s International Major Projects Database / 51 References / 53 About the authors / 62 Acknowledgments / 63 Publishing information / 64 Supporting the Fraser Institute / 65 Purpose, funding, & independence / 66 About the Fraser Institute / 67 Editorial Advisory Board / 68 fraserinstitute.org / i ii / fraserinstitute.org Executive summary There is general agreement among diverse groups and individuals that Canada’s transportation infrastructure desperately requires improvement. As governments move to confront this challenge, it is not enough that they simply commit to building more roads or bridges; the infrastructure must be built on time and on budget, be of high quality, and be well-maintained. The conventional way for providing transportation infrastructure involves the government hiring a firm to build the facility based on a pre- scriptive design. The government then takes responsibility for operating and maintaining the facility and perhaps outsources some aspects of care to pri- vate companies. With a history of construction-cost overruns and time delays as well as other notable problems, the conventional process has not served Canadians well.
  • Canada Infrastructure Bank Spending Outlook

    Canada Infrastructure Bank Spending Outlook

    April 28, 2021 CANADA INFRASTRUCTURE BANK SPENDING OUTLOOK Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) The Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) supports Parliament by providing economic and financial analysis for the purposes of raising the quality of parliamentary debate and promoting greater budget transparency and accountability. This report examines the current and projected status of the Canada Infrastructure Bank’s investment commitments and funding disbursements. Lead Analyst: Nora Nahornick, Analyst This report was prepared under the direction of: Trevor Shaw, Director Nancy Beauchamp, Carol Faucher, Jocelyne Scrim and Rémy Vanherweghem assisted with the preparation of the report for publication. For further information, please contact [email protected] Yves Giroux Parliamentary Budget Officer RP-2122-003-S_e Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Current status 4 3. Causes of funding delays 6 4. Benchmarking CIB 9 5. Future outlook 11 Defining the Public Sector 14 Benchmarking Organizations 15 Projected Spending 17 Capital Losses and Operating Expenses 19 Notes 21 Canada Infrastructure Bank Spending Outlook Executive Summary As part of the $187.8 billion Investing in Canada Plan, the Government established the Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) to invest $35 billion into large, revenue generating infrastructure projects that are in the public interest, and developed and delivered in partnership with public, private, and institutional investors.1 Four years into its mandate, funding is being disbursed by CIB much slower than planned. As of April 22, 2021, CIB has publicly announced $5.1 billion in investments for seventeen projects. However, finalizing contracts and the actual disbursement of money has lagged the CIB’s own projections.