DOCSLIB.ORG

Koffka's Aesthetic Gestalt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Koffka's Aesthetic Gestalt GENERAL NOTE Koffka’s Aesthetic Gestalt B RAN KA SPEHAR AND GERT J. VA N TONDER A neglected theory of aesthetics by the eminent Gestaltist Kurt of a path toward a more holistic theory of aesthetic appre- Koffka is reviewed with the hope that it will spark new interest ciation. His theory is of considerable potential relevance for in the Gestalt contribution to art. Koffka’s particular emphasis on modern science. For this reason we consider it timely and the art object, its perceptual qualities and its relation with the ABSTRACT intentional self holds the potential for advancing scientific theories relevant to revisit the origins and essence of Koffka’s intel- of aesthetic experience. lectual legacy. SHORTCOMINGS IN THEORIES In 1940, Kurt Koffka [1]—a leading German Gestalt psychol- OF THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ART ogist tenured at Smith College, Northampton—participated Koffka pointed out several significant problems in the theo- at the Bryn Mawr Art Symposium held near Philadelphia ries of the psychology of art of the time, some of which still [2]. The occasion brought together multidisciplinary con- plague current attempts to unite art, psychology and science tributions from an art historian (Richard Bernheimer), an [8]. Psychologists still persisted in getting “aesthetic results archaeologist (Rhys Carpenter), a philosopher (Milton C. by lifting lines, colors, sounds, rhythms, words out of all con- Nahm) and a psychologist (Koffka himself). Visionary for texts.” He asserts that “psychology has to some extent failed its time, the symposium departed from narrow departmental to understand the problems involved” [9]. specialization in approaches to art and was reviewed and well The first problem was that the dominant theories of the received in a wide array of journals [3]. time divided their focus onto the psychology of either the Aware that the diverse aspects of aesthetic experience— artist or the the spectator, thus neglecting the work of art. from perspectives of culture, ecology, evolution, emotion, To Koffka, the psychology of the artwork itself is of great psychology, knowledge, physiology—have historically been importance: What requires explanation is not the physical treated largely in isolation, Koffka accepted the invita- work of art but the experienced art object, the perceptually tion to the symposium with great reluctance, considering presented artwork. it a daunting task. Indeed, numerous subsequent attempts Second, the wide range of individual responses to art was toward a multidisciplinary theory of art have likewise taken as evidence that aesthetics could not be a domain of struggled with the problems already foreshadowed at this objective investigation, reinforcing the idea that the work of symposium [4]. art was irrelevant to a serious theory of aesthetic experience. Koffka’s presentation was singled out as the most impor- And third, the dominant approaches in the 1940s were tant contribution for advancing a scientific theory of art [5,6]. preoccupied with the place and nature of emotion in both Even so, Koffka’s essay remained dormant and largely for- the production and enjoyment of a work of art. Koffka con- gotten after publication [7], partly due to the wider turmoil sidered this the most serious of all the problems he identified generated by World War II. A closer look at the essay’s ideas in the psychology of art; he noted: reveal not only scrutiny of the shortcomings in the dominant theories of art appreciation at the time but also articulation As long as one tries to study these emotions purely as states of or events in the self, one will understand neither these emotions nor their relation to art [10]. Branka Spehar (educator), School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. Email: <[email protected]>. Typically, the aesthetic experience was considered a com- Gert J. van Tonder (independent researcher), Reki-An Pavilion, Kamigamo plex emotion; this notion played a central role in the so- Minamiojicho, Kyoto, 603-8074, Japan. called empathy-based theories of art, which insist that the See <www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/leon/50/1> for supplemental files associated with this issue. aesthetic experience results from spectators projecting their ©2017 ISAST doi:10.1162/LEON_a_01020 LEONARDO, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 53–57, 2017 53 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LEON_a_01020 by guest on 30 September 2021 own emotive state onto the art object. According to Theodor tual datum, Koffka presented an alternative to the predomi- Lipps, a founding father of the theory of empathy, the experi- nant psychological approach, which was focusing exclusively ence of art is equated with aesthetic empathy, according to on the artist and spectator. The emphasis on the phenom- which a marble column looks powerful because the spectator enal art object firmly establishes Koffka’s analytical approach unconsciously projects onto the column his own kinesthetic within the Gestalt concern for the lawfulness of perceptual experience of what it would feel like to stretch out limbs to organization of visual stimuli, i.e. an objective science of ex- support and hold up a roof [11]. Similarly, Herbert Langfeld perienced perceptual qualities. argues that “the objects cannot be pleasing unless they give The phenomenal organization of the perceived art object rise to unified emphatic responses, because the nervous set is experienced at three levels [14,15]. Its primary qualities are requires such unification” [12]. Koffka remarks: “Inasmuch nearly atomic features, such as local position, orientation, as the appeal of the work of art issues from its structure, it motion. Secondary qualities relate holistic properties: An is this structure, and not the emotion which this structure object can be round, smooth, spiky, soft, colored, dynamic. arouses, that is of primary importance for our understanding Tertiary qualities convey more nuanced values: An object can of the psychology of art” [13]. be graceful, sad, slow, cheerful. Perceptual qualities, at the Koffka argues in great detail how a deeper understanding tertiary level, are experienced as deeply meaningful. of the experienced art object could surmount some problem- Koffka refers to these qualities as the physiognomic prop- atic discrepancies in emotive states of the self, pitted against erties of the phenomenal object, a term coined by Heinz the aesthetic experience of art. Werner and traced back to Franz Brentano, whose concep- tualization of phenomenal experience can rightly be con- KOFFKA’S PSYCHOLOGY OF ART sidered a cornerstone of the Gestalt School of Psychology. The central tenet in Koffka’s theory is that aesthetic experi- According to Werner, we perceive stimuli physiognomically ence emerges as a relationship between the intentional self of when we react to their dynamic, emotional and expressive the spectator and the internal phenomenological presenta- qualities, as opposed to acknowledging only their metric tion of the physical work of art. characteristics [16]. Werner introduced the notion of the This relationship is construed as a field structure of which physiognomic mode, in contrast to the geometric-technical the strength, directionality, width and depth characterize the mode of perceiving. The two modes are oriented toward dif- nature of the aesthetic experience. There are thus three com- ferent classes of perceptual attributes and are functionally ponents to the theory: the self, the phenomenal object and independent: Despite being potentially correlated with pri- the field relationship, connecting the former two (Fig. 1). The mary or secondary qualities (shapes, configurations, colors self here denotes the emotive kernel consciously experienced or sounds), physiognomic qualities are neither derived from as centered on an observer. nor reducible to them. Importantly, physiognomic qualities By drawing attention to analysis of the artwork as percep- cannot be captured by such classical Gestalt notions as “fig- ural goodness,” or Prägnanz, because these can apply indifferently to phenomena of both objec- tive-technical and physiognomic perception. For Koffka, physiognomic characteristics are outstanding instances of qualities with “re- quiredness,” which determine behavior directly: “Objects speak to us through their physiognomic character which, therefore, cannot, in their turn be caused by the responses which they provoke” [17]. The notion of expressive and physiognomic qualities overcomes three major problems asso- ciated with the above-mentioned empathy-based approaches to aesthetic experience. First, there is the problem of contingency: In a behaviorist ap- proach, the relationship between artistic stimulus and aesthetic response is not anticipated through rational logic, but is listed in a blind lookup-table, acquired through associative learning. In a very rudimentary example, roundness could map to beauty, jaggedness to shock and redness to pas- sion; it is only a mapping, without the internal Fig. 1. A schematic depiction of Koffka’s theory. Aesthetic experience here is characterized relations that lead to these associations. The phys- as a field structure connecting the self and the phenomenal object. The latter is organized into iognomy of the phenomenal art object naturally three levels of qualities, each level spanning different attributes. (© Gert J. van Tonder) facilitates a rational connection with emotive 54 Spehar and van Tonder, Koffka’s Aesthetic Gestalt Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LEON_a_01020
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11: Behaviorism
    Chapter 11: Behaviorism Megan Davis, Nicole Pelley and Stephanie Quinlan Behaviorism (1892-1956) ● Psychology has been the study of the mind since the Greeks ○ The definition of the mind has been debated extensively ○ 20th century: Shift from what the mind was to what it did ■ Mind causes behavior ● New field of research ○ Psychology was redefined with help from animal psychology ○ People started believing humans evolved from animal forms ○ Had to rethink Descartes’ definition of the mind New Directions in Animal Psychology New Directions in Animal Psychology Animal psychology as Romanes begun it, used 2 methods: 1. Anecdotal Method → Collect data 2. Method of Inference → Interpret data Close examination in late 19th, early 20th century. Anecdote → Experiment From Anecdote to Experiment ● Experiment replaced anecdotes and informal, naturalistic experiments ● Aim of animal psychology - produce natural science and anecdote not the path to science ● Two important research programs: ○ Thorndike ○ Pavlov From Anecdote to Experiment Edward Lee Thorndike (1874-1949): ● Initially wanted to study children ● Not many readily available, took up animals ● Studied with William James ● Developed “connectionism” ○ Methodological and theoretical approach to animal learning ○ Formulation of an S-R psychology he called “connectionism” ○ Anecdotal method overestimated animal intelligence From Anecdote to Experiment Thorndike’s Puzzle Boxes ● Trap cat inside box ● Each box opened by cat in different way ● Rewarded with salmon for escaping ○ Ex. of instrumental
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroaesthetics of Art Vision: an Experimental Approach to the Sense of Beauty
    Cl n l of i ica a l T rn r u ia o l s J ISSN: 2167-0870 Journal of Clinical Trials Research Article Neuroaesthetics of Art Vision: An Experimental Approach to the Sense of Beauty Maddalena Coccagna1, PietroAvanzini2, Mariagrazia Portera4, Giovanni Vecchiato2, Maddalena Fabbri Destro2, AlessandroVittorio Sironi3,9, Fabrizio Salvi8, Andrea Gatti5, Filippo Domenicali5, Raffaella Folgieri3,6, Annalisa Banzi3, Caselli Elisabetta1, Luca Lanzoni1, Volta Antonella1, Matteo Bisi1, Silvia Cesari1, Arianna Vivarelli1, Giorgio Balboni Pier1, Giuseppe Santangelo Camillo1, Giovanni Sassu7, Sante Mazzacane1* 1Department of CIAS Interdepartmental Research Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy;2Department of CNR Neuroscience Institute, Parma, Italy;3Department of CESPEB Neuroaesthetics Laboratory, University Bicocca, Milan, Italy;4Department of Letters and Philosophy, University of Florence, Italy;5Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy;6Department of Philosophy Piero Martinetti, University La Statale, Milan, Italy;7Department of Musei Arte Antica, Ferrara, Italy;8Department of Neurological Sciences, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy;9Department of Centre of the history of Biomedical Thought, University Bicocca, Milan, Italy ABSTRACT Objective: NEVArt research aims to study the correlation between a set of neurophysiological/emotional reactions and the level of aesthetic appreciation of around 500 experimental subjects, during the observation of 18 different paintings from the XVI-XVIII century, in a real museum context. Methods: Several bio-signals have been recorded to evaluate the participants’ reactions during the observation of paintings. Among them: (a) neurovegetative, motor and emotional biosignals were recorded using wearable tools for EEG (electroencephalogram), ECG (electrocardiogram) and EDA (electrodermal activity); (b) gaze pattern during the observation of art works, while (c) data of the participants (age, gender, education, familiarity with art, etc.) and their explicit judgments about paintings have been obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Vygotsky's Stage Theory: the Psychology of Art and the Actor
    Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18: 319–341, 2011 Copyright © Regents of the University of California on behalf of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition ISSN 1074-9039 print / 1532-7884 online DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2010.518300 Vygotsky’s Stage Theory1: The Psychology of Art and the Actor under the Direction of Perezhivanie Peter Smagorinsky The University of Georgia This article reviews Vygotsky’s writings on arts (particularly logocentric art including the theater) and emotions, drawing on his initial exploration in ThePsychologyofArtand his final considerations set forth in a set of essays, treatises, and lectures produced in the last years of his life. The review of The Psychology of Art includes attention to the limits of his analysis, the mixed Marxist legacy that is evident in the book, the cultural blinders that affect his vision of the relative value of differ- ent artistic productions, the content of what he elsewhere refers to his “tedious investigations” into extant views, and the gist of what he considers to be the essence of art. Attention to his late work falls into two areas: Emotion in formal drama and emotion in everyday drama, each of which involves perezhivanie, roughly but incompletely characterized as emotional experience. The article concludes with an effort to situate Vygotsky’s writing on art and emotion both within his broader effort to artic- ulate a comprehensive developmental psychology of socially, culturally, and historically grounded individuals and social groups, and within scholarship that has extended and questioned his work as his influence has expanded beyond the clinics of Soviet Moscow. In this article I attempt to bridge work undertaken by L.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurt Lewin and Experimental Psychology in the Interwar Period
    '55#466'21 @744)1%71%"#5("#0'5!&#14"#5 2!6243&')2523&'#F4D3&')DG !& ( ) E @7#4)'1 921 11 #4)'1B #4 4 5'"#16"#4 70 2)"6E 1'9#45'6 6@7#4)'1C 42$D4D 1E #1"4'() #46@ #4#(1"#4 &')2523&'5!&#1(7)6 6 C 42$D'!&#)#")#B & 76!&6#4C PD 42$D4D 84%#1#11 QD 42$D4D'6!&#))D 5& #46#'"'%60SD'QIPR Forward I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Dr. Jürgen Renn, Director of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, who supported my pre-doctoral research from the early ideation, through all of its ups and downs until the final line of the disputatio at the Humboldt University of Berlin. Beyond that, the Institute enabled my research project by granting me a PhD scholarship and providing a fruitful work environment, while the well-organized MPIWG library offered me the opportunity to assemble the majority of the material for this book. I am obliged to Professor Dr. Mitchell Ash for his commentaries and insights from his vast knowledge in the history of psychology, as well as for being part of my PhD committee de- spite the geographical distance. I would like to also thank Dr. Alexandre Métraux for advising me on questions related to Lewin’s philosophy of science. Moreover, I am highly indebted to Dr. Massimilano Badino for his scholarly advice, but even more so for his friendship and moral support whenever I needed it. In addition to that, he en- couraged and prepared me to present my work in a variety of international conferences.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrative Look at the Psychology of Creative Writing
    P1: PjU CUUS563-21 cuus563 ISBN: 978 0 521 88164 7 Top: 0.3764in Gutter: 0.87828in March 13, 2009 3:5 21 Putting the Parts Together: An Integrative Look at the PsychologyofCreativeWriting scott barry kaufman and james c. kaufman As should be evident from reading this book, the psychology of creative writing is complex and multifaceted, and there are many different levels in which it may be investigated. We decided to focus on five levels in this book. There is much overlap, however, among these five levels, and an understanding of one level typically increases our understanding of one or more other levels. Therefore, we would argue that a more complete understanding of the psychology of creative writing could be gained by the investigation of each of the five levels and their interactions. What are these levels? At one level, this book tries to further our understanding of the psychology of the creative writer. What are creative writers like? Are there characteristics that differentiate them from other types of writers? From professionals in other fields? At the second level is the actual text. How can an understanding of the printed word help elucidate the psychology of creative writing? The third level is about the process. What is the creative writing process? Are there certain processes that lead to more success in creative writing? At the fourth level is the development of creative writing as well as the development of the creative writer. How can creative writing be improved? How can the actual creative writing process help people cope with stress, traumatic events, or even mental illness? And finally, at the fifth level is the teaching of creative writing in schools and workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • ART-2300: Art Therapy III: Approaches and Techniques 1
    ART-2300: Art Therapy III: Approaches and Techniques 1 ART-2300: ART THERAPY III: APPROACHES AND TECHNIQUES Cuyahoga Community College Viewing: ART-2300 : Art Therapy III: Approaches and Techniques Board of Trustees: May 2020 Academic Term: Fall 2020 Subject Code ART - Art Course Number: 2300 Title: Art Therapy III: Approaches and Techniques Catalog Description: An examination of various techniques used by therapists. Studio exposure work is used as a tool to understand and cultivate the discipline of self-awareness. Students must participate in site visits for observation and interviewing of a professional art therapist. Professional level certification in Art Therapy requires appropriate work experience and a master's degree from an approved program. Course meets AATA prerequisite requirements for entering a Master's program in Art Therapy. Credit Hour(s): 3 Lecture Hour(s): 2 Lab Hour(s): 2 Requisites Prerequisite and Corequisite ART-1610 Art Therapy II: Methods and Medias; and PSY-1010 General Psychology or PSY-101H Honors General Psychology, and PSY-2050 Psychology of Personality. Outcomes Course Outcome(s): Apply the creative process to themselves and others to use and interpret art as a healing technique, a vehicle for change, and for human development and growth. Objective(s): 1. Create and teach an art therapy product to the class that demonstrates the creative process. 2. Increase personal creativity by direct involvement with the creative process and will be able to apply to others. 3. Interpret the creative process in the arts: dance, music, drama, poetry, painting, and various other alternative techniques. 4. Explain the relationships among varied creative therapies and how they are similar and different.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. EMPATHY and COMMUNICATION THROUGH ART 1. Emotional
    DOI: 10.1515/rae-2017-0018 Review of Artistic Education no. 14 2017 139-146 2. EMPATHY AND COMMUNICATION THROUGH ART Marinela Rusu58 Abstract: Art is one of the finest means of shaping the personality, of access to aesthetic and moral values of society. The paper presents some of the elements of communication through art, in the double sense of this process, from the artwork (creator) to the viewer, but also from the viwer to the work of art and creator. The key-element of this dual process is the empathy, the ability to feel the emotional states of others. It develops within a set of personality traits, including: emotional intelligence, emotional feelings diversity, cognitive skills, along with motivation and personal ideals. Art is a medium of communication but also an element of developing a general receptivity to the world and its authentic values. Key words: art, communication, empathy, creativity, art receptor, aesthetic judgment 1. Emotional feelings and empathy Empathy, being a component of emotional intelligence domain, is the cornerstone of any attempt to optimize psychological self-awareness and relationships with others. Without empathy world would be a dull world, a place of autism and emotional schizophrenia. "We are spiritually rich, writes S. Marcus (1997, p. 80), only to the extent that we can enrich ourselves with empathic experiences, and we gain the depth of spiritual understanding only when we come to truly understand those around us." Interactions with others put often in discussion the empathic abilities that we have, revealing how well we know and understand those around us, without resorting necessarily the a verbal communication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Art and Psychology
    J. Life Sci. Biomed. 2(4): 129-133, 2012 JLSB © 2011, Scienceline Publication Journal of L ife S cience and B iomedicine ISSN 2251-9939 The Relationship between Art and Psychology Kamali Nader1 and Javdan Moosa*2 1. Hormozgan University, Minab Road, Bandar Abbas, Iran 2. Islamic Azad University, Minab Branch, Iran *Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Art is one of important means to develop creativity and establishment of inner innovative forces if reinforced appropriately many mental problems of human beings could be resolved. Psychology is the science studies human behaviors such as fear, motivation to depression, mental and psychological disorders. However, art works to give sense and value to concepts humans touch them and feel them. Therefore, art can be regarded as an efficient tool either for increasing children’s and teenagers’ self-esteem or as a means for treatment of psychological problems. The interceding relationship between psychologies an art is in perception and sense it gives to every day's happenings and phenomena. This giving meaning in art is observable through creation of art masterpieces and in psychology could be evident unconsciously in individual’s personality. The Islamic education systems emphasizes on man’s nature, self-purification and its original content regards art as one of the most crucial and stable training styles and achieve salvation. Thus, the mission of art and psychology principally is objective explanation, growth and perfectness for human communities and consequently education and smoothing their soul in dealing with nature and human creations like the individual himself. Key words: art, psychology, art therapy INTRODUCTION The subject of art has been considered for a long time by scholars and philosophers such as Aristotle and the professional relation of art works with psychology backs to thousands years ago to Catharsis times.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Response Art in Art Therapy: Past Present and Future
    An Overview of Response Art in Art Therapy: Past Present and Future Abstract Since the beginning of the field, many art therapists have made artwork to help them manage and understand their practice. Response art is “Art that is made by art therapists to contain, explore, and express clinical work” (Fish 2006, p.13). Response art is an important resource in art therapy because it grounds the work in the therapist’s artistic practice. Response art warrants discussion in order to clarify its meaning, support our understanding of it and to teach it effectively. This paper provides an overview of the history of response art, including its origin in clinical work, current uses in art-based supervision and art-based research. Art therapists have engaged in making and reflecting on response art throughout the history of art therapy (Fish, 1989; Jones, 1983; Kielo, 1991; Lachman-Chapin, 1983, 2001; McNiff, 1989; Miller, 2007; Moon,1990, 1999; Robbins, 1988; Wadeson, 1990, 2003; Wolf, 1985). Today, response art is often used as an integral part of art therapy practice, training and supervision (Deaver, 2012; Deaver & Shiflett, 2011; Fish, 2012, 2017a; Fish & Lee 2017; Schaverien & Case, 2007; Wadeson, 2003). It is also used as data to inform, and as the synthesis of, art-based research (Allen, 1999a; Fish, 2006, 2013, 2017b, 2017c; McNiff, 2013; Leavy, 2013, 2017). Art therapists who recognize the importance of the artists’ perspective in art therapy, stress the value of maintaining their artists’ identity. (Lachman- Chapin, 1983; Lavery, 1994; Moon, 1992, 1997, 1999; C. Moon, 2002; Wix, 1996). Art therapists with an artistic practice of creating and reflecting on their images as part of their work, find response art to be a ready tool to contain, explore and communicate about their work (Allen, 1995; Fish, 1989, 2012; McNiff, 1992; Moon 1999; C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Creativity and Sensitivity on Colour Perception
    Eye of the beholder: The effects of creativity and sensitivity on colour perception Emma Harvey Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Higher Diploma in Arts in Psychology at Dublin Business School, School of Arts, Dublin. Supervisor: Dr Jonathan Murphy Head of Department: Dr S. Eccles March 2014 Department of Psychology Dublin Business School 1 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 2 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 Creativity......................................................................................................................................... 4 Sensitivity ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Categorical Perception .................................................................................................................. 12 Current Study ................................................................................................................................ 15 METHOD: ........................................................................................................................................ 18 Participants
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Client Imagery in Art Therapy
    Journal of Clinical Art Therapy Volume 1 Issue 1 Special Edition: 30th Anniversary Article 6 Celebration of Art Therapy at LMU May 2011 Understanding Client Imagery in Art Therapy Erica K.M. Curtis Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/jcat Part of the Art Practice Commons, Clinical Psychology Commons, Counseling Psychology Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, Other Psychology Commons, and the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Curtis, E. K. (2011). Understanding Client Imagery in Art Therapy. Journal of Clinical Art Therapy, 1(1), 9-15, retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/jcat/vol1/iss1/6 This Peer Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marital and Family Therapy at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Clinical Art Therapy by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Understanding Client Imagery in Art Therapy Cover Page Footnote Correspondence concerning this article may be sent to the author, Erica Curtis, LMFT, ATR-BC, at [email protected] This peer reviewed article is available in Journal of Clinical Art Therapy: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/jcat/vol1/ iss1/6 Curtis: Understanding Client Imagery in Art Therapy Journal of Clinical Art Therapy 1(1) 9 May 2011 Understanding Client Imagery in Art Therapy Erica K. Curtis, Loyola Marymount University1 This study offers a preliminary investigation into the question: LITERATURE REVIEW How do art therapists make meaning from viewing client-made While a full exploration of meaning-making from imag- art? Art therapy literature on making meaning from client art is ery would necessarily include a range of disciplines, theoretical reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Artworks Are Evaluated As Extensions of Their Creators
    Artworks are evaluated as extensions of their creators George E. Newman and Rosanna K. Smith What are the psychological processes that drive the evaluation and appreciation of art? To date, the psychological study of art has largely focused on the perceptual aspects of viewing artwork—i.e., how certain colors, shapes, axes of symmetry, etc. give rise to perceptions of beauty and good form. More recently, however, a number of researchers have begun to examine the conceptual factors underlying the appreciation of art. The aim of this chapter is to synthesize these conceptual approaches under a common theoretical umbrella. Specifically, we propose that people intuitively evaluate artwork as a physical extension of its creator—the extended-self hypothesis (see Belk 1988, James 1890, Newman 2013, Newman, Smith and Bartels 2014). Thus, art appreciation is not only influenced by the object’s aesthetic features, but also by key conceptual factors including beliefs about the artist’s mental state and the degree of physical connection to the work. In this chapter, we review a number of recent studies that support this framework. We also report the results of a new experimental study, which suggests that in certain cases, artwork itself may be intuitively viewed as a living entity. 1. Aesthetic Psychology One natural approach to the study of art appreciation is to assume that there are particular aesthetic features that drive evaluations of art. For example, certain perceptual elements (e.g., composition, goodness of form, etc.) may lead one painting to be judged as more beautiful or aesthetically pleasing than another. Indeed, early research on the psychology of aesthetics was motivated by the notion that there are universal aesthetic principles that guide art appreciation.
    [Show full text]