An Overview of Response Art in Art Therapy: Past Present and Future
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
An Overview of Response Art in Art Therapy: Past Present and Future Abstract Since the beginning of the field, many art therapists have made artwork to help them manage and understand their practice. Response art is “Art that is made by art therapists to contain, explore, and express clinical work” (Fish 2006, p.13). Response art is an important resource in art therapy because it grounds the work in the therapist’s artistic practice. Response art warrants discussion in order to clarify its meaning, support our understanding of it and to teach it effectively. This paper provides an overview of the history of response art, including its origin in clinical work, current uses in art-based supervision and art-based research. Art therapists have engaged in making and reflecting on response art throughout the history of art therapy (Fish, 1989; Jones, 1983; Kielo, 1991; Lachman-Chapin, 1983, 2001; McNiff, 1989; Miller, 2007; Moon,1990, 1999; Robbins, 1988; Wadeson, 1990, 2003; Wolf, 1985). Today, response art is often used as an integral part of art therapy practice, training and supervision (Deaver, 2012; Deaver & Shiflett, 2011; Fish, 2012, 2017a; Fish & Lee 2017; Schaverien & Case, 2007; Wadeson, 2003). It is also used as data to inform, and as the synthesis of, art-based research (Allen, 1999a; Fish, 2006, 2013, 2017b, 2017c; McNiff, 2013; Leavy, 2013, 2017). Art therapists who recognize the importance of the artists’ perspective in art therapy, stress the value of maintaining their artists’ identity. (Lachman- Chapin, 1983; Lavery, 1994; Moon, 1992, 1997, 1999; C. Moon, 2002; Wix, 1996). Art therapists with an artistic practice of creating and reflecting on their images as part of their work, find response art to be a ready tool to contain, explore and communicate about their work (Allen, 1995; Fish, 1989, 2012; McNiff, 1992; Moon 1999; C. Moon, 2002). Due to the focus on art therapy credentialing and licensing, there has been increased discussion about art therapy supervision (Carpendale, 2011; Deaver & Shiflett, 2011; Fish, 2008, 2017a; Lahad, 2000; Miller, 2012; Schaverien & Case, 2007). Art therapists recognize that response art is a valuable resource, supporting therapists’ conceptualization of treatment and helping to clarify their reactions to it. (Deaver, 2012; Fish, 2008, 2012, 2017a; Robb & Miller, 2017; Schaverien & Case, 2007). Affordable, accessible technology has expanded the potential for the use of response art in art-based supervision, making distance supervision more available. Once video conference platforms are determined to be HIPPA compliant, response art, made and shared during video conferencing, supports distance art-based supervision, contributing to worldwide exchanges of support and ideas (Fish, 2017a; Fish and Lee, 2017). Interest in qualitative research points to art-based ways of providing evidence and sharing information (Fish, 2006, 2008, 2013, 2017b, 2017c; Franklin, 2010; Leavy, 2017; McNiff, 2013). Allen (1999a), contends that “To make art as a way to dwell in and explore a phenomena leads to truth and heuristic knowing. This is a form of primary research” (p. 160). Fish (2017b, 2017c) used response art as a method for investigation and as data to inform research, creating fiction, synthesized from response art and crafted into stories of clinical experience. This form of social research synthesizes lived experience and carries information into academic and public discourse. Response art’s use has expanded beyond helping art therapists to understand countertransference. Whether we practice clinically or in the community, teach, supervise, research or advocate for those we work with, the images that we make in response are ready guides to support effective work while helping us to take care of ourselves. References Allen, P. B. (1995). Art is a way of knowing. Boston, MA: Shambhala. Allen, P. B. (1999a). The Sabbath Bride: An example of art-based research [Abstract]. Proceedings of the American Art Therapy Association, USA, 160. Carpendale, M. (2011). A traveler’s guide to art therapy supervision, Bloomington, IN: Trafford. Deaver, S.P. (2012). Art-based learning strategies in art therapy graduate education. Art Therapy: Art therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 29(4), 158-165. doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2012.730029 Deaver, S. P., & Shiflett, C. (2011). Art-based supervision techniques. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(2), 257-276. doi:10.1080/07325223.2011.619456 Fish, B. (1989). Addressing countertransference through image making. In H. Wadeson, J. Durkin, & D. Perch (Eds.). Advances in art therapy. (pp. 376-389). New York, NY: John Wiley. Fish, B. J. (2006). Image-based narrative inquiry of response art in art therapy (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. AAT 3228081). Fish, B. J. (2008). Formative evaluation of art-based supervision in art therapy training. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 25(2), 70-77. doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2008.10129410 Fish, B. J. (2012). Response art: The art of the art therapist. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 29(3), 138-143. doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2012.701594 Fish, B. J. (2013). Painting research: Challenges and opportunities of intimacy and depth. In S. McNiff. (Ed.). Art as Research: Opportunities and Challenges. (pp. 209-219). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Fish, B. J. (2017a). Art-based Supervision: Cultivating therapeutic insight through imagery. New York, NY: Routledge. Fish, B. J. (2017b). Carrying the Story: Response Art Informing Art-based Research. Proceedings of the American Art Therapy Association. Abstract retrieved from Abstracts in the American Art Therapy Association database. https://www.xcdsystem.com/aata/proceedings2017/prof111.html Fish, B. J. (2017c). Drawing and Painting Research. In P. Leavy, (Ed.). Handbook of Arts-Based Research. New York, NY: Guilford. Fish, B. J. and Lee, SC. (2017). Art-based Supervision: Supported by Response Art at Home and Abroad. Proceedings of the American Art Therapy Association. Abstract retrieved from Abstracts in the American Art Therapy Association database. http://www.xcdsystem.com/aata/abstract/File8548/95_AbstractandReferences_01041116 24-ed.pdf Franklin, M. (2010). Affect regulation, mirror neurons, and the third hand: Formulating mindful empathic art interventions. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 27(4), 160–167. doi:10.1080/07421656.2010.10129385 Jones, D. L. (1983). An art therapist’s personal record. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 1(1), 22–25. doi:10.1080/07421656.1983.10758734 Kielo, J. B. (1991). Art therapists’ countertransference and post-session therapy imagery. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 8(2), 14–19. doi:10.1080/07421656.1991.10758923 Lachman-Chapin, M. (1983). The artist as clinician: An interactive technique in art therapy. American Journal of Art Therapy, 23(1), 13-25. Lachman-Chapin, M. (2001). Self psychology and art therapy. In J. Rubin, J. (Ed.). Approaches to art therapy (2nd Ed) (pp. 66-78). New York, NY: Brunner/Routledge. Lahad, M. (2000). Creative Supervision. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley. Lavery, T. P. (1994). Culture shock: Adventuring into the inner city through post-session imagery. American Journal of Art Therapy, 33(1), 14–20. Leavy, P. (2013). Fiction as research practice. New York, NY: Routledge. Leavy, P. (Ed). (2017). Handbook of arts-based Research. New York, NY: Guilford. McNiff, S. (1989). Depth psychology of art. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. McNiff, S. (1992). Art as medicine: Creating a therapy of the imagination. Boston, MA: Shambhala. McNiff, S. (2013). Art as research: Opportunities and challenges. Chicago, IL: Intellect. Miller, A. (2012). Inspired by El Duende: One-Canvas Process Painting in Art Therapy Supervision. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art therapy Association, 29(4), 166- 173. doi: 10.1080/07421656.2013.730024 Miller, R. B. (2007). Role of response art in the case of an adolescent survivor of developmental trauma. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 24(4), 184–190. doi:10.1080/07421656.2007.10129470 Moon, B. L. (1990). Existential art therapy: The canvas mirror. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. Moon, B. L. (1992). Essentials of art therapy training and practice. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. Moon, B. L. (1997). Art and soul: Reflections on an artistic psychology. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. Moon, B.L. (1999). The Tears Make Me Paint: The Role of Responsive Artmaking in Adolescent Art Therapy. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 16(2), 78-82. doi.org/10.1080/07421656.1999.10129671 Moon, C. H. (2002). Studio art therapy: Cultivating the artist identity in the art therapist. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley. Robb, M & Miller, A. (2017). Supervisee Art-Based Disclosure in El Duende Process Painting Therapy, Art therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association. 34(4) 192-200. doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2017.1398576 Robbins, A. (1988). A psychoaesthetic perspective on creative arts therapy and training. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 15(2), 95–100. doi:10.1016/0197-4556(88)90016-0 Schaverien, J, & Case, C. (Eds.). (2007) Supervision of art psychotherapy: A practical handbook. New York, NY: Routledge. Wadeson, H. (1990). Through the looking glass: Dark sides I. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 7(3), 107–118. doi.org/10.1080/07421656.1990.10758902 Wadeson, H. (2003). Making art for professional processing. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 20(4), 208–218. doi:10.1080/07421656.2003.10129606 Wix, L. (1996) The Art in Art Therapy Education: Where is It?, Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 13(3), 174-180. doi: 10.1080/07421656.1996.10759217 Wolf, R. (1985). Image induction in the countertransference: A revision of the totalistic view. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 2(3), 120–133. /doi.org/10.1080/07421656.1985.10758804 .