Energetics and Foraging Behaviour of the Platypus Ornithorhynchus Anatinus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
World Heritage Values and to Identify New Values
FLORISTIC VALUES OF THE TASMANIAN WILDERNESS WORLD HERITAGE AREA J. Balmer, J. Whinam, J. Kelman, J.B. Kirkpatrick & E. Lazarus Nature Conservation Branch Report October 2004 This report was prepared under the direction of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment (World Heritage Area Vegetation Program). Commonwealth Government funds were contributed to the project through the World Heritage Area program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment or those of the Department of the Environment and Heritage. ISSN 1441–0680 Copyright 2003 Crown in right of State of Tasmania Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any means without permission from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. Published by Nature Conservation Branch Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart Tasmania, 7001 Front Cover Photograph: Alpine bolster heath (1050 metres) at Mt Anne. Stunted Nothofagus cunninghamii is shrouded in mist with Richea pandanifolia scattered throughout and Astelia alpina in the foreground. Photograph taken by Grant Dixon Back Cover Photograph: Nothofagus gunnii leaf with fossil imprint in deposits dating from 35-40 million years ago: Photograph taken by Greg Jordan Cite as: Balmer J., Whinam J., Kelman J., Kirkpatrick J.B. & Lazarus E. (2004) A review of the floristic values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Report 2004/3. Department of Primary Industries Water and Environment, Tasmania, Australia T ABLE OF C ONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................1 1. -
Wellington Park Historic Tracks and Huts Network Comparative Analysis
THE HISTORIC TRACK & HUT NETWORK OF THE HOBART FACE OF MOUNT WELLINGTON Interim Report Comparative Analysis & Significance Assessment Anne McConnell MAY 2012 For the Wellington Park Management Trust, Hobart. Anne D. McConnell Consultant - Cultural Heritage Management, Archaeology & Quaternary Geoscience; GPO Box 234, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001. Background to Report This report presents the comparative analysis and significance assessment findings for the historic track and hut network on the Hobart-face of Mount Wellington as part of the Wellington Park Historic Track & Hut Network Assessment Project. This report is provided as the deliverable for the second milestone for the project. The Wellington Park Historic Track & Hut Network Assessment Project is a project of the Wellington Park Management Trust. The project is funded by a grant from the Tasmanian government Urban Renewal and Heritage Fund (URHF). The project is being undertaken on a consultancy basis by the author, Anne McConnell. The data contained in this assessment will be integrated into the final project report in approximately the same format as presented here. Image above: Holiday Rambles in Tasmania – Ascending Mt Wellington, 1885. [Source – State Library of Victoria] Cover Image: Mount Wellington Map, 1937, VW Hodgman [Source – State Library of Tasmania] i CONTENTS page no 1 BACKGROUND - THE EVOLUTION OF 1 THE TRACK & HUT NETWORK 1.1 The Evolution of the Track Network 1 2.2 The Evolution of the Huts 18 2 A CONTEXT FOR THE TRACK & HUT 29 NETWORK – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 2.1 -
For Personal Use Only Use Personal for SPONSORING BROKER Kaz Capital Pty Ltd AFSL: 384738
ACN 156 369 336 PROSPECTUS For the Offer of 20,000,000 Shares at an offer price of 20 cents each to raise up to $4,000,000 with a Minimum Subscription of $3,000,000 with 1 free attaching Listed Option exercisable at 30 cents on or before 31 March 2016 for every Share subscribed for and issued. Oversubscriptions of up to a further 5,000,000 Shares at an issue price of 20 cents each to raise up to a further $1,000,000 with 1 free attaching Listed Option for every Share subscribed for and issued may be accepted. For personal use only SPONSORING BROKER Kaz Capital Pty Ltd AFSL: 384738 Important Information This Prospectus provides important information to assist prospective investors in deciding whether or not to invest in the Company. It should be read in its entirety. If you do not understand it, you should consult your professional advisers. THE SECURITIES OFFERED UNDER THIS PROSPECTUS ARE OF A SPECULATIVE NATURE. CORPORATE DIRECTORY Directors Solicitors Peter McNeil Non-Executive Chairman Steinepreis Paganin Robert McNeil Managing Director/CEO Level 4 16 Milligan Street Graham Fish Non-Executive Director PERTH WA 6000 Jay Stephenson Non-Executive Director Page Seager Company Secretary RACT House Level 2 Lisa Hartin 179 Murray Street HOBART TAS 7000 Registered Office 2 Village High Road Independent Geologist BENOWA QLD 4217 Aimex Geophysics Pty Ltd Telephone: +61 7 5564 8823 PO Box 8356 Facsimile: +61 7 5597 7215 Gold Coast Mail Centre Website: www.torquemining.com.au BUNDALL QLD 9726 Email: [email protected] Investigating Accountant -
Alluvial Gold
GSHQI\ TASMANIA DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES 1991 MINERAL RESOURCES OFTASMANIA 11 Alluvial gold by R. S. Bottrill B.Sc. (Hons). M.Sc. DIVISION OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES ISBN 0 7246 2083 4 GPO BOX 56, ROSNY PARK, TASMANIA 7018 ISSN 0313-1998 BoTIRILL, R. S. 1991. Alluvial gold. Miner. Resour. Tasm. II. ISBN 0 7246 2083 4 ISSN0313-2043 TECHNICAL EDITOR, E. L. Martin TEXT INpUT, C. M. Humphries Mineral Resources o/Tasmania is a continuation of Geological Survey Minerai Resources ALLUVIAL GOlD 3 CONTENTS Introduction .. 5 1. Mangana-Mathinna-Alberton 5 2. Gladstone-Derby . 5 3. Lisle ....... 5 4. Back Creek-Lefroy 5 5. Beaconsfield 6 6. Moina . ... 6 7. Wynyard .. 6 8. Arthur River 6 9. Corinna-Savage River .. ... 6 10. Ring River-Wilson River 6 11. Lyell-Darwin . ... 7 12. Jane River . 7 13. Cygnet 7 14. Others . .. 7 Discussion . 7 Acknowledgements . ..... 7 References . .... .. 9 Appendix A: Occurrences of alluvial gold in Tasmania . ..... .• •... .11 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Areas of major alluvial gold production in Tasmania ...... ... 4 2. Polished section of a gold grain from the Lisle goldfield, showing a porous I skeletal structure . 8 3. Polished section of a gold grain from the Lisle goldfield, showing a rim of silver-depleted gold on silver..,nriched gold ..... ......................... .... ......... 8 4 MlNERAL RESOURCES OF TASMANIA II 0 1+4 Scm PRINCIPAL AREAS OF ALLUVIAL GOLD PRODUCTION IN TASMANIA o 100 kilometres TN I 1470 Figure 1. Areas of major alluvial gold produclion in Tasmania described in the lext- 1: Mangana-Mathinna-Alberton, 2: Gladslon&-Derby, 3: Lisle, 4: Back Creek-Lefroy, 5: Beaconsfield, 6: Moina, 7: Wynyard, 8: Arthur River, 9: Corinna-Savage River, 10: Ring River-Wilson River, 11 : Lyell-Darwin, 12: Jane River, 13: Cygnet. -
The Aboriginal Names of Rivers in Australia Philologically Examiped
The Aboriginal Names of Rivers in Australia Philologically Examiped. By the late REV. PETER 1I'L\.CPIIERSON, 1I'LA. [Read before the Royal Society qf N.S. W., 4 August, 188G.J IT is the purpose of this paper to pass in review the names which the aborigines of Australia have given to the rivers, streams, and waters generally of the country which they llave occupied. More specifically, attention will bo directed to the principles if discover able on which the names have been given. In this inquiry con stant regard will be had to the question whether the Aborigines have followed the same general principles which are found to pre vail in other languages of th"l world. -Without further preface, it may be stated that all available vocabularies will be searched for the terms used to designate water, whether in the shape of rivers, brooks, or creeks; expansions of water, as oceans, seas, bays, or harbours; lakes, lagoons, pools, or waterboles; swamps, or maJ"Shes; springs, or wells; rain, or ,vaterfalls; and any other form in which water is the important element. M, imitative of the sound of Waters. Words for Watel' containing the letter jJf. To make a beginning, let one of the imitative root words for water be chosen as the basis of experiment. There is the letter Jl, which represents the It1wnming sound pertaining to water, whether flowing in streams or moved by tides and winds in ocean expanses. In carrying out the experiment the method followed will be (1) to examine the vocabularies for root-words designating water in any of the shapes already indicated, and embodying in the present case the letter 1n; (2) to examine the gazetteers of the several colonies, to ascertain how the same letter is embodied in the actual names of rivers, streams, and waters generally; and (3) to compare the results with the root words for water in other part-s of the world. -
Verification of the Heritage Value of ENGO-Proposed Reserves
IVG REPORT 5A Verification of the heritage value of ENGO-proposed reserves Verification of the Heritage Value of ENGO-Proposed Reserves IVG Forest Conservation REPORT 5A 1 March 2012 IVG REPORT 5A Verification of the heritage value of ENGO-proposed reserves IVG Forest Conservation Report 5A Verification of the Heritage Value of ENGO-Proposed Reserves An assessment and verification of the ‘National and World Heritage Values and significance of Tasmania’s native forest estate with particular reference to the area of Tasmanian forest identified by ENGOs as being of High Conservation Value’ Written by Peter Hitchcock, for the Independent Verification Group for the Tasmanian Forests Intergovernmental Agreement 2011. Published February 2012 Photo credits for chapter headings: All photographs by Rob Blakers With the exception of Chapter 2 (crayfish): Todd Walsh All photos copyright the photographers 2 IVG REPORT 5A Verification of the heritage value of ENGO-proposed reserves About the author—Peter Hitchcock AM The author’s career of more than 40 years has focused on natural resource management and conservation, specialising in protected areas and World Heritage. Briefly, the author: trained and graduated—in forest science progressing to operational forest mapping, timber resource assessment, management planning and supervision of field operations applied conservation—progressed into natural heritage conservation including conservation planning and protected area design corporate management—held a range of positions, including as, Deputy Director -
Corundum and Sapphire in Tasmania
Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania Record 1996/05 Corundum and sapphire in Tasmania by R. S. Bottrill INTRODUCTION xenocrysts (including zircon, spinel and anorthoclase) (Coenraads et al., 1990; Robertson Two principal types of corundum occurrence are and Sutherland, 1992). The major primary host rock known in Tasmania; gem sapphires in various in central Queensland is thought to be the alluvial deposits, and finer grained rock-forming associated pyroclastic rocks, indicating that corundum in situ in granite-related deposits in the volatile-rich magmas may have brought corundum Mt Read Volcanics. These occurrences (fig. 1) are and other phases rapidly to the surface, possibly described below. from a nepheline syenite source rock at pressures of greater than 10 kbar (>35 km depth; Robertson and SAPPHIRES AND RUBIES Sutherland, 1992). Guo et al. (1996) found evidence, in the mineral inclusions in corundum, that there Sapphires are a gem variety of corundum (Al O ). 2 3 were at least two stages of genesis, related to The name was originally intended only for stones carbonatitic and basaltic magmas. Intrusion of with a blue colour, but is now used for stones of any CO -bearing ultrabasic magmas deep in the crust colour except red (which is usually designated as the 2 may have evolved carbonatitic fluids, which would variety ruby), and including green, yellow and have reacted with overlying silicic rocks, forming purple. The colours are mostly due to varying corundum and other minerals in syenitic and proportions of iron and titanium or, in the case of granitic pegmatites. Later volatile-rich mafic ruby, traces of chromium, in the crystal lattice. -
When Did the Mistletoe Family Loranthaceae Become Extinct in Tasmania? Review and Conjecture
12 When did the mistletoe family Loranthaceae become extinct in Tasmania? Review and conjecture Mike Macphail Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT [email protected] Greg Jordan University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania Feli Hopf The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT Eric Colhoun University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Introduction ‘Mistletoe’ is the common name for a diverse group of hemi-parasitic shrublets that grow attached to and within the branches of trees and shrubs. Vidal-Russell and Nickrent (2008a) and Nickrent et al. (2010) infer that the mistletoe habit has evolved five times in the sandalwood order Santalales. The first of these clades is the family Misodendraceae, which is endemic to southern South America and whose species grow mainly on Nothofagus. The habit evolved three times within the Santalaceae – in the cosmopolitan tribe Visceae, which includes the ‘archetypal’ European Mistletoe Viscum album, in tropical American species of Santaleae that were formerly placed into a separate family, the Eremolepidaceae, and in the tropical tribe Amphorogyneae. The third clade comprises all members of the Loranthaceae except the early diverging genera Nuytsia and Atkinsonia. The family is restricted to the Southern Hemisphere except for a few terra australis 34 256 Mike Macphail et al. genera growing north of the equator in the tropics and around the Mediterranean. Two mistletoe clades are extant in Australia. These are (1) Visceae (three genera including Viscum), which is restricted to rainforests, monsoon forests and woodlands along the northern and eastern margins, and (2) Loranthaceae (12 genera), which is widely distributed across mainland Australia, with hosts ranging from coastal mangrove forests to mulga (Acacia aneura) woodlands in the arid zone (www.anbg.gov.au/abrs/online-resources/flora/redirect.jsp). -
National Estate Report - Tasmania
National Estate Report - Tasmania Foreword Summary Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: National Estate cultural values Chapter 3: National Estate natural values Chapter 4: National Estate outcomes References Glossary Abbreviations Tables Rule set used to identify National Estate old-growth forest areas Figure 2.1: Identifying forest places of National Estate social significance Maps Appendices Foreword This National Estate report (Background Report Part H) is one of a series of background reports forming the information base that will be used to prepare the Tasmania-Commonwealth Regional Forest Agreement. It contains information about National Estate values in Tasmania's forests. In the RFA process, 1996 was devoted largely to the collection and publication of information relating to the social and economic and environmental and heritage values of Tasmania's forests. The results of this process were published in November 1996 as the Public Land Use Commission's Background Reports Parts C and D. In September 1996 people and groups interested in the management of Tasmania's forests were invited to participate in the RFA integration process. To facilitate this process each interest group has been allocated a Commission-appointed 'mentor'. Participants are putting forward issues and questions that they have identified as needing particular attention as the RFA information is studied by governments. The next steps involve drawing together the various outcomes of the environment and heritage and social and economic studies and developing options that will satisfy the RFA objectives. The RFA integration process is being undertaken by a joint Project Team under the direction of the Tasmania-Commonwealth Steering Committee. -
Introduction Methods Results
Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 136, 2002 127 CENOZOIC PLANT MACROFOSSIL SITES OF TASMANIA by G. J. Jordan and R. S. Hill (with one text-figure and one appendix) JORDAN, G.J. & HILL, R.S., 2002 (31 :xii): Cenozoic plant macro fossil sites of Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 136: 127-139. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.136.127 ISSN 0080-4703. School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (GJ*); Centre for Evolution and Biodiversity, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia; and Department of Environmental Biology, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia (RSH). *Author for correspondence. Tasmania has an outstanding Cenozoic plant fossil record, including several sites of international significance. This paper provides a compendium of macrofossil sites and associated literature. Macrofossils (leaves, fruit, flowers, wood) are known from 59 sites, ranging from Early Eocene to Late Pleistocene in age. Most are Palaeogene to early Neogene, or Pleistocene, with only one Late Neogene deposit. Most late Palaeogene and early Neogene fossiliferous beds are directly overlain by or interbedded between basalt or other volcanic rocks. Others have indirect association with past volcanic activities. Furthermore, most sites are on or near the floors of major valley systems, whether associated with basalt or not. This association with a limited range of environments may cause some biases in the sampling of past regional floras.The ages of these sites may be significantfo r our understanding of the ages of volcanism in Tasmania, and also suggest areas for further investigation. -
The Tamar Trough Revisited: Correlations Between Sedimentary Beds, Basalts, Their Ages and Valleyevolution, North Tasmania
Papers and Proceedings of theRoyal Society of Tasmania, Volume 140, 2006 49 THE TAMAR TROUGH REVISITED: CORRELATIONS BETWEEN SEDIMENTARY BEDS, BASALTS, THEIR AGES AND VALLEYEVOLUTION, NORTH TASMANIA by F.L. Sutherland, I.T. Graham, S.M. Forsyth, H. Zwingmann and J.L. Everard (with eight text-figures, two plates, nine tables and two appendices) Sutherland, EL., Graham, I.T., Forsyth, S.M., Zwingmann, H. & Everard,J.L. 2006 (30:xi). "l11e Tamar Trough revisited: correlations between sedimentary beds, basalts, their ages and valley evolution, North Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings of the Roya! Society of Tasmania 140: 49-72. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.140.49 ISSN 0080-4703. Geoscience, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia (FLS*, ITG); Tasmanian Geological Survey, Mineral Resources Tasmania, PO Box 56, Rosny Park, Tasmania 7018, Australia (SMF, JLE); CSIRO Division of Petroleum Resources & Centre of Excellence in Mass Spectrometry, School of Applied Geology, Curtin University, Western Australia 6102, Australia (HZ). *Author for correspondence. The Tamar Trough, an Early Palaeogene fault structure, contains sedimentary beds and interleaved basaltic flows that infill the structure along its 70 km length. These infills represent a complex interplay between sedimentation, channel erosion, eruptive dislocations, and even 'out of trough' diyersions of the ancestral Tamar drainage. Several areas of resistant basalt flows remain in the south, upper, middle and lower Tamar reaches. Although some palynological control was known, radiometric dating of previously untested basalts now allows close integration and age-pegging for observed palynological biozones. The K-Ar and Ar-Ar ages of the basalt bodies indicate eruptive events at 47, 33-37 and 25 Ma, correlating with Proteacidites asperopo!us-Ma!vacipo!!is diversus, Nothofagites asperus and I'roteacidites tu bercu!atusbiozone age sedimentary beds respectively. -
Western-Tasmania- a Place of Outstanding Universal Value
Western Tasmania A Place of Outstanding Universal Value Proposed extensions to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Geoff Law - September 2009 1 Objective This report describes the World Heritage values of the Tasmanian Wilderness; explains the meaning of World Heritage; identifies shortcomings in the boundaries of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area; and proposes extensions to the World Heritage Area to ensure that all World Heritage values are protected and conditions of integrity are met. This proposal draws on the large body of work — including many reports by government agencies — attesting to the outstanding universal values of Western Tasmania as a whole, and not just those parts within the TWWHA. This is not a comprehensive proposal of new reserves across Tasmania. That has been described by Environment Tasmania and the WIlderness Society. The areas identified here are those places that satisfy the World Heritage criteria and conditions of integrity as described in the Operational Guidelines of the World Heritage Convention. The report does not address land tenure except to say that the identified World Heritage extensions should be protected and managed in accordance with the rights and responsibilities of the areas’ Aboriginal traditional owners. Conserving the areas’ outstanding natural and Aboriginal cultural values in perpetuity requires a status of protection equivalent to IUCN categories 1 or 2, such as national park. The Tasmanian Wilderness is one of the world’s great temperate wilderness areas. Its outstanding universal values have been recognised through inscription of 1.38 million Commissioned by Senator Bob Brown hectares on UNESCO’s World Heritage List. A World Heritage Area must have outstanding universal values as defined by the World Heritage Committee’s operational guidelines.