Form 990 (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Form 990 (PDF) ** PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COPY ** Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax OMB No. 1545-0047 Form 990 Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations) (Rev. January 2020) | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. 2019 Department of the Treasury Open to Public Internal Revenue Service | Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information. Inspection A For the 2019 calendar year, or tax year beginning and ending B Check if C Name of organization D Employer identification number applicable: Address change SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON Name change Doing business as 46-0809713 Initial return Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number Final return/ 801 23RD AVENUE SOUTH STE A (206)323-2396 termin- ated City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code G Gross receipts $ 8,334,585. Amended return SEATTLE, WA 98144 H(a) Is this a group return Applica- tion F Name and address of principal officer: ELIZABETH WHITFORD for subordinates? ~~ Yes X No pending SAME AS C ABOVE H(b) Are all subordinates included? Yes No I Tax-exempt status: X 501(c)(3) 501(c) ( )§ (insert no.) 4947(a)(1) or 527 If "No," attach a list. (see instructions) J Website: | WWW.SCHOOLSOUTWASHINGTON.ORG H(c) Group exemption number | K Form of organization: X Corporation Trust Association Other | L Year of formation: 2012 M State of legal domicile: WA Part I Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities: SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON PROVIDES SERVICES AND GUIDANCE FOR ORGANIZATIONS TO ENSURE ALL YOUNG PEOPLE 2 Check this box | if the organization discontinued its operations or disposed of more than 25% of its net assets. 3 Number of voting members of the governing body (Part VI, line 1a) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3 10 4 Number of independent voting members of the governing body (Part VI, line 1b) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4 10 5 Total number of individuals employed in calendar year 2019 (Part V, line 2a) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5 55 6 Total number of volunteers (estimate if necessary) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 6 20 7 a Total unrelated business revenue from Part VIII, column (C), line 12 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 7a 0. Activities & Governance b Net unrelated business taxable income from Form 990-T, line 39 7b 0. Prior Year Current Year 8 Contributions and grants (Part VIII, line 1h) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 7,711,620. 7,853,850. 9 Program service revenue (Part VIII, line 2g) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 433,976. 466,161. 10 Investment income (Part VIII, column (A), lines 3, 4, and 7d) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4,161. 14,574. Revenue 11 Other revenue (Part VIII, column (A), lines 5, 6d, 8c, 9c, 10c, and 11e) ~~~~~~~~ -1,781. 0. 12 Total revenue - add lines 8 through 11 (must equal Part VIII, column (A), line 12) 8,147,976. 8,334,585. 13 Grants and similar amounts paid (Part IX, column (A), lines 1-3) ~~~~~~~~~~~ 3,418,552. 3,656,004. 14 Benefits paid to or for members (Part IX, column (A), line 4) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0. 0. 15 Salaries, other compensation, employee benefits (Part IX, column (A), lines 5-10) ~~~ 3,298,859. 3,211,154. 16a Professional fundraising fees (Part IX, column (A), line 11e) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0. 14,541. b Total fundraising expenses (Part IX, column (D), line 25) | 189,158. Expenses 17 Other expenses (Part IX, column (A), lines 11a-11d, 11f-24e) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1,587,278. 1,610,958. 18 Total expenses. Add lines 13-17 (must equal Part IX, column (A), line 25) ~~~~~~~ 8,304,689. 8,492,657. 19 Revenue less expenses. Subtract line 18 from line 12 -156,713. -158,072. Beginning of Current Year End of Year 20 Total assets (Part X, line 16) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4,004,654. 3,742,375. 21 Total liabilities (Part X, line 26) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 474,158. 373,951. Net Assets or 22 Net assets or fund balances. Subtract line 21 from line 20 3,530,496. 3,368,424. Fund Balances Part II Signature Block Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete. Declaration of preparer (other than officer) is based on all information of which preparer has any knowledge. Sign = Signature of officer Date Here ELIZABETH WHITFORD, CEO = Type or print name and title Print/Type preparer's name Preparer's signature Date Check PTIN if Paid MATTHEW R. MATSON MATTHEW R. MATSON 05/14/20 self-employed P00775671 Preparer Firm's name 9 BDO USA, LLP Firm's EIN 9 13-5381590 Use Only Firm's address 9 601 UNION ST, STE 2300 SEATTLE, WA 98101-2345 Phone no.(206) 382-7777 May the IRS discuss this return with the preparer shown above? (see instructions) X Yes No 932001 01-20-20 LHA For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions. Form 990 (2019) SEE SCHEDULE O FOR ORGANIZATION MISSION STATEMENT CONTINUATION Form 990 (2019) SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON 46-0809713 Page 2 Part III Statement of Program Service Accomplishments Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part III X 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission: SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON PROVIDES SERVICES AND GUIDANCE FOR ORGANIZATIONS TO ENSURE ALL YOUNG PEOPLE HAVE SAFE PLACES TO LEARN AND GROW WHEN NOT IN SCHOOL. SOWA IS DEDICATED TO BUILDING COMMUNITY SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT QUALITY AFTERSCHOOL, YOUTH DEVELOPMENT AND SUMMER 2 Did the organization undertake any significant program services during the year which were not listed on the prior Form 990 or 990-EZ? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes X No If "Yes," describe these new services on Schedule O. 3 Did the organization cease conducting, or make significant changes in how it conducts, any program services? ~~~~~~ Yes X No If "Yes," describe these changes on Schedule O. 4 Describe the organization's program service accomplishments for each of its three largest program services, as measured by expenses. Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations are required to report the amount of grants and allocations to others, the total expenses, and revenue, if any, for each program service reported. 4a (Code: ) (Expenses $ 1,847,942. including grants of $ 118,125. ) (Revenue $ 234,685. ) THE STATEWIDE PROGRAM QUALITY INITIATIVE WORKS TO ENSURE THAT AFTERSCHOOL AND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS MEET HIGH QUALITY STANDARDS OF PRACTICE THROUGH ASSESSMENT, TRAINING, COACHING AND CAPACITY BUILDING. 4b (Code: ) (Expenses $ 3,586,451. including grants of $ 3,325,286. ) (Revenue $ ) OUR GRANTMAKING PROGRAM SUPPORTS EXPANDED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES THROUGHOUT THE STATE. CURRENTLY, WE PROVIDE GRANTS IN THE SUMMER WITH OUR FEED YOUR BRAIN GRANT; THROUGHOUT THE SCHOOL YEAR FOR SUPPORTING FIRST YEAR REFUGEE YOUTH WITH OUR REFUGEE SCHOOL IMPACT PROGRAM; AND IN KING COUNTY THROUGH THE BEST STARTS FOR KIDS OUT OF SCHOOL TIME PROGRAM. 4c (Code: ) (Expenses $ 1,591,172. including grants of $ 300. ) (Revenue $ 220,767. ) SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON IS AN INTERMEDIARY ORGANIZATION WORKING TO ENSURE ALL YOUTH HAVE SAFE PLACES TO LEARN AND GROW WHEN NOT IN SCHOOL. WE DO NOT DIRECTLY SERVE YOUTH, BUT INSTEAD PROVIDE AFTERSCHOOL AND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROVIDERS, COMMUNITIES, AND DECISION MAKERS WITH THE RESOURCES, TOOLS, SKILLS, AND KNOWLEDGE THEY NEED TO SUPPORT YOUTH IN ACHIEVING POSITIVE OUTCOMES IN SCHOOL AND IN LIFE. 4d Other program services (Describe on Schedule O.) (Expenses $ 790,010. including grants of $ 212,293. ) (Revenue $ 10,709. ) 4e Total program service expenses | 7,815,575. Form 990 (2019) 932002 01-20-20 2 11390514 758871 091040.0 2019.03042 SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON 091040.1 Form 990 (2019) SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON 46-0809713 Page 3 Part IV Checklist of Required Schedules Yes No 1 Is the organization described in section 501(c)(3) or 4947(a)(1) (other than a private foundation)? If "Yes," complete Schedule A ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 X 2 Is the organization required to complete Schedule B, Schedule of Contributors? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 X 3 Did the organization engage in direct or indirect political campaign activities on behalf of or in opposition to candidates for public office? If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3 X 4 Section 501(c)(3) organizations. Did the organization engage in lobbying activities, or have a section 501(h) election in effect during the tax year? If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part II ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4 X 5 Is the organization a section 501(c)(4), 501(c)(5), or 501(c)(6) organization that receives membership dues, assessments, or similar amounts as defined in Revenue Procedure 98-19? If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part III ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5 X 6 Did the organization maintain any donor advised funds or any similar funds or accounts for which donors have the right to provide advice on the distribution or investment of amounts in such funds or accounts? If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part I 6 X 7 Did the organization receive or hold a conservation easement, including easements to preserve open space, the environment, historic land areas, or historic structures? If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part II~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 7 X 8 Did the organization maintain collections of works of art, historical treasures, or other similar assets? If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part III ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8 X 9 Did the organization report an amount in Part X, line 21, for escrow or custodial account liability, serve as a custodian for amounts not listed in Part X; or provide credit counseling, debt management, credit repair, or debt negotiation services? If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part IV ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 9 X 10 Did the organization, directly or through a related organization, hold assets in donor-restricted endowments or in quasi endowments? If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part V ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 10 X 11 If the organization's answer to any of the following questions is "Yes," then complete Schedule D, Parts VI, VII, VIII, IX, or X as applicable.
Recommended publications
  • Paris: Trams Key to Multi-Modal Success
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com JANUARY 2016 NO. 937 PARIS: TRAMS KEY TO MULTI-MODAL SUCCESS Innsbruck tramway enjoys upgrades and expansion Bombardier sells rail division stake Brussels: EUR5.2bn investment plan First UK Citylink tram-train arrives ISSN 1460-8324 £4.25 Sound Transit Swift Rail 01 Seattle ‘goes large’ A new approach for with light rail plans UK suburban lines 9 771460 832043 For booking and sponsorship opportunities please call +44 (0) 1733 367600 or visit www.mainspring.co.uk 27-28 July 2016 Conference Aston, Birmingham, UK The 11th Annual UK Light Rail Conference and exhibition brings together over 250 decision-makers for two days of open debate covering all aspects of light rail operations and development. Delegates can explore the latest industry innovation within the event’s exhibition area and examine LRT’s role in alleviating congestion in our towns and cities and its potential for driving economic growth. VVoices from the industry… “On behalf of UKTram specifically “We are really pleased to have and the industry as a whole I send “Thank you for a brilliant welcomed the conference to the my sincere thanks for such a great conference. The dinner was really city and to help to grow it over the event. Everything about it oozed enjoyable and I just wanted to thank last two years. It’s been a pleasure quality. I think that such an event you and your team for all your hard to partner with you and the team, shows any doubters that light rail work in making the event a success.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue #30, March 2021
    High-Speed Intercity Passenger SPEEDLINESMarch 2021 ISSUE #30 Moynihan is a spectacular APTA’S CONFERENCE SCHEDULE » p. 8 train hall for Amtrak, providing additional access to Long Island Railroad platforms. Occupying the GLOBAL RAIL PROJECTS » p. 12 entirety of the superblock between Eighth and Ninth Avenues and 31st » p. 26 and 33rd Streets. FRICTIONLESS, HIGH-SPEED TRANSPORTATION » p. 5 APTA’S PHASE 2 ROI STUDY » p. 39 CONTENTS 2 SPEEDLINES MAGAZINE 3 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER On the front cover: Greetings from our Chair, Joe Giulietti INVESTING IN ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY AND ENERGY-EFFICIENT HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS WILL CREATE HIGHLY SKILLED JOBS IN THE TRANS- PORTATION INDUSTRY, REVITALIZE DOMESTIC 4 APTA’S CONFERENCE INDUSTRIES SUPPLYING TRANSPORTATION PROD- UCTS AND SERVICES, REDUCE THE NATION’S DEPEN- DENCY ON FOREIGN OIL, MITIGATE CONGESTION, FEATURE ARTICLE: AND PROVIDE TRAVEL CHOICES. 5 MOYNIHAN TRAIN HALL 8 2021 CONFERENCE SCHEDULE 9 SHARED USE - IS IT THE ANSWER? 12 GLOBAL RAIL PROJECTS 24 SNIPPETS - IN THE NEWS... ABOVE: For decades, Penn Station has been the visible symbol of official disdain for public transit and 26 FRICTIONLESS HIGH-SPEED TRANS intercity rail travel, and the people who depend on them. The blight that is Penn Station, the new Moynihan Train Hall helps knit together Midtown South with the 31 THAILAND’S FIRST PHASE OF HSR business district expanding out from Hudson Yards. 32 AMTRAK’S BIKE PROGRAM CHAIR: JOE GIULIETTI VICE CHAIR: CHRIS BRADY SECRETARY: MELANIE K. JOHNSON OFFICER AT LARGE: MICHAEL MCLAUGHLIN 33
    [Show full text]
  • Minneapolis Streetcar Feasibility Study Final Report
    Figure ES-1 Candidate Streetcar Corridors 49TH AVE NE 5TH ST NW COUNTY ROAD E2 W EAST RIVER RD NE Highland ECKBERG DR AVE N AVE Legend BROOKLYN BLVD Brooklyn Center Hilltop 8TH AVE NW AVE 8TH 53RD AVE N NE AVE Transit Centers HUMBOLDT COUNTY RD E 1ST ST NW STINSON BLVD NE STINSON BLVD Crystal VE N 44TH AVE NE T Existing 51ST AVE N Fridley NE JEFFERSON ST UNIVERSITY 44TH AVE NE New Brighton Arden Hills ANT AVE N AVE ANT T RD BRIGHTON NEW FRANCE A FRANCE Columbia Heights Planned Poplar 49TH AVE N BRY JonesCandidate ST NE ST Silver Columbia Heights 8 Y SHINGLE CREEK DR T Primaryt Transit Network (PTN) Streetcar CorridorJohanna 40TH AVE NE SILVER LN MAIN ST NE ST MAIN ARTHUR Definite PTN OSSEO RD HIGHWAY 100 OLD HIGHWA LAKE DR WEBBER PKWY Recommended PTN 44TH AVE N 37TH AVE NE Hart COUNTY ROAD D W Candidate PTN Little Johanna 42ND A Robbinsdale VE N Hiawatha Corridor Light Rail Line Alignment & StationsLangton T WEST BROADW 5TH ST NE VE N VE Robbinsdale RD LAKE SILVER SAINT ANTHONY PKWY I-35 BRT and Stations (future) 94 Langton Y MEMORIAL DR MEMORIAL Y ¥ AY AVE NE AVE CENTRAL Central Corridor Light Rail Line Alignment & Stations DOWLING AVE N JOHNSON NE ST VICTOR (future)St. Anthony A CLEVELAND NEW BRIGHTON BLVD Limited Stop M 29TH AVE NE Bottineau BRT Alignment & Stations Hennepin County B 29TH AVE NE COUNTY ROAD C W (future) Crystal Service F Southwest Corridor Transitway Alignment & Stations 27TH AVE NE Roseville FRANCE AVE N AVE FRANCE (future - alignmentsSAINT ANTHONY BLVD still in planning stages) COUNTY ROAD B2 W LOWRY AVE N Limited
    [Show full text]
  • Design Standards Manual October, 2009 King County Metro Graphic Standards and Guidelines
    Design Standards Manual October, 2009 King County Metro Graphic Standards and Guidelines Contents Introduction to the RapidRide Brand....................................................................1-1 RapidRide Brand Identity Trademark...................................................................................................1-3 Color Palette ...............................................................................................1-4 Proportions.................................................................................................1-5 Clear Space.................................................................................................1-6 Color ..........................................................................................................1-7 Reversed.....................................................................................................1-8 Incorrect Usage...........................................................................................1-9 In Conjunction with the King County Metro Logo .......................................1-11 Print and Electronic Applications System Brochure Cover................................................................................2-1 System Map Style........................................................................................2-2 Line Map Style ............................................................................................2-3 Metro System Map with RapidRide Lines......................................................2-5
    [Show full text]
  • Bombardier Manufactures a Variety of Standalone Transit Systems, Including the INNOVIA Monorail, the INNOVIA APM, and the MOVIA Light Metro
    Response to City of San Jose RFI 2019-DOT-PPD-4 New Transit Options: Airport-Diridon-Stevens Creek Transit Connection Bombardier manufactures a variety of standalone transit systems, including the INNOVIA Monorail, the INNOVIA APM, and the MOVIA Light Metro. All these systems, or a combination of these systems, could be an excellent basis for the Airport - Diridon - Steven's Creek corridor project(s). Of the three technologies, the INNOVIA Monorail appears to best address the objectives of the proposed project in that it is less expensive to construct, can be constructed more rapidly, and operates in a grade-separated, high capacity system. Ultimately the choice of technology depends on a variety of factors, most notably the planned ridership per hour, which are not available at present. As such, Bombardier has submitted information on all three technologies, and looks forward to the opportunity to discuss the best fit solution with the City of San Jose at their convenience. Bombardier anticipates that this project could be delivered as a Design-Build-Operate Maintain Finance (DBFOM) Public Private Partnership (PPP). Contact: Kevin Walker, Head of Ecosystem US West [email protected] (210) 781 9316 Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA Inc. 1501RFI 2019 LEBANON-DOT-PPD CHURCH-4 ROAD PITTSBURGH,New Transit Options: PA 15236 Airport -USADiridon -Stevens Creek Transit Connection Confidential and Proprietary Information Page | 1 New Transit Options: Airport-Diridon-Stevens Creek Transit Connection INNOVIA 300 APM Executive Summary With Automobile-based transportation reaching saturation in Silicon Valley, the City of San Jose is looking for sustainable transportation solutions which can be deployed quickly and cost effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Access Ride Guide
    King County Metro Access Ride Guide You can also read the Ride Guide online at www.kingcounty.gov/AccessRideGuide Revised January 2015 Contact Us Access Rideline 206-205-5000 TTY Relay: 711 Toll Free Line: 1-866-205-5001 Reservations and Customer Service: Normal business hours: 7 days a week, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Ride Status: 24 hours, 7 days a week Mailing Address: 821 Second Ave, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98104 Email [email protected] Web......................................www.kingcounty.gov/Access Accessible Services ............................. 206-263-3113 TTY Users ............................Washington State Relay: 711 Mail ....... 821 Second Ave, Suite 1240, Seattle, WA 98104 Email [email protected] Web ....................... metro.kingcounty.gov/tops/accessible Speak to someone about your Access eligibility. Metro Customer Service .................... 206-553-3000 Get current information on transit fares and Access pass costs. Find what bus and/or train takes you to your desti- nation. ORCA Pass ....................................... 1-888-988-6722 TTY Users .............................Washington State Relay: 711 Web .................................................. www.orcacard.com The ORCA Pass system, how it works and how to use it. 2-1-1 King County Information Line .................2-1-1 Find transportation providers and agencies that offer help with transportation costs. King County Metro Access Ride Guide Hello, and welcome to King County Metro Access Trans- portation (Access). This guide was put together with you in mind. We hope you find it helpful and easy to use. Why was Access Transportation created? Riding the bus or rail isn’t always possible when you have a disability. Even the best bus and rail service will have barriers some of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Streetcar Cities] Summaries of the Various Streetcar Projects from Around the United States
    2012 [SURVEY OF STREETCAR CITIES] SUMMARIES OF THE VARIOUS STREETCAR PROJECTS FROM AROUND THE UNITED STATES Introduction Streetcars are enjoying a national revival in these early years of the 21st century. As communities across the nation rediscover the charm and efficiency of this short distance transit option, they are investing in new streetcar lines or extensions of existing operations. This survey in support of The Community Streetcar Coalition (CSC) was commissioned to track important streetcar development projects, planned or underway, in major U.S. cities. Portland Streetcar Inc. funded this work with the partial proceeds of its 2005 Rudy Bruner Gold Medal Award for Urban Excellence. This survey report is a living, working document. It will be updated regularly, and shared with policymakers, opinion leaders, interested municipalities, and those involved in streetcar issues and technologies. Cities wishing to be included in subsequent iterations of this document should contact Julie Gustafson, [email protected]. The Community Streetcar Coalition The Community Streetcar Coalition was established in 2004. It is comprised of cities, transit authorities and private sector that are focused on supporting the Small Starts program and establishment of a program that supports streetcars in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) and advocating with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to implement the Small Starts program. The CSC conducts monthly phone calls for members and twice
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit and Modal Integration City of Edmonton Transit Strategy Guiding Perspectives Background Papers
    REPORT NO 1515014-009 BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND MODAL INTEGRATION CITY OF EDMONTON TRANSIT STRATEGY GUIDING PERSPECTIVES BACKGROUND PAPERS MARCH 2016 BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND MODAL INTERGRATION Report, Version 2.6 Project no: 1515014-009 Date: March 2016 – WSP Canada Inc. Suite 300 9925 109 St Edmonton AB T5K 2J8 Phone: +1 780-466-6555 Fax: +1 780-466-8200 www.wspgroup.com 4 24 March 2016 Mr Bryan Whited City of Edmonton 9803 102A Ave NW Edmonton, AB T5J 3A3 Subject : Bus Rapid Transit and Modal Integration Transit Strategy Guiding Perspectives Background Technical Paper Dear Mr Whited, WSP | MMM Group is pleased to present this Background Technical Paper to help inform future policy considerations as part of the City of Edmonton’s Transit Strategy project that is currently underway. We hope the paper assists the City and interested stakeholders in better understanding the role Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and modal integration could potentially play in the future Edmonton Metropolitan Region. As noted in this Paper, the concept and implementation of BRT, as it is applied in cities and regions across North America, ranges considerably: from increased frequency on existing bus routes right through to full-fledged high-capacity rapid transit with purpose-built vehicles on major transit corridors operating in their own exclusive right of way. This paper discusses the history of BRT, examines a number of case studies where it has been converted to Light Rail Transit (LRT), highlights the issue of integration with other modes. It also nominates three potential applications for BRT that warrant further discussion and highlights potential solutions for integrating modes at key points in the transit network, both now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Streetcar System Plan
    SACRAMENTO STREETCAR SYSTEM PLAN February 2012 Acknowledgements City of Sacramento – City Council Kevin Johnson – Mayor Jay Schenirer – District 5 Angelique Ashby – Vice Mayor, District 1 Kevin McCarty – District 6 Sandy Sheedy – District 2 Darrell Fong – District 7 Steve Cohn – District 3 Bonnie Pannell – District 8 Robert King Fong – District 4 City of Sacramento – Project Coordinators Fedolia “Sparky” Harris – Department of Transportation (DOT) Denise Malvetti – Economic Development Department (EDD) Project Technical Advisory Committee City of Sacramento Sacramento Regional Transit District Hector Barron – DOT RoseMary Covington Bill Crouch – Community Development Jeff Damon Leslie Fritzsche – EDD Ryan Moore – DOT SACOG Tom Pace – Community Development Jim Brown Greg Taylor – Community Development Ed Williams – DOT Consultant Team Fehr & Peers Shiels Obletz Johnsen (SOJ) Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Ken Johnsen David Carter Rick Gustafson Robin Hutcheson Brad Tong Nicole Foletta Kyle Cook HDR Steve Rhyne Charlie Hales Carrie Carsell Jim Hecht Amy Smith Sharon Kelly AIM Consulting Bay Area Economics Gladys Cornell Matt Kowta Ciara Zanze Ron Golem Messagesmith Douglas Wright Consulting Rick Laubscher Doug Wright Sacramento Streetcar System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................1 Plan Goals . .1 Planning Context . .1 Purpose and Need Statement . 4 II. STREETCAR NETWORK PLANNING PROCESS ..................................6 Planning Stages . .6 III. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Session Line 1 Title of Session Line 2
    Long Range Planning to Build Successful Communities Lisa Shafer King County Metro Transit Seattle, Washington Today’s Topics 1. Getting to the Metro CONNECTS Vision 2. What it is 3. A vision for livability 4. Implementing the vision 2 By 2040 our regionWhy willnow? increase by: What will it take to respond to these needs? 70% 850k 1m GROWTH in Metro service, from 3.5 million service hours to 6 million hours by 2040. 3 Developing a Shared Vision 4 Input from Cities Where is transit going in the future Redmond TMP • Service and capital requirements • Long-term funding needs How can transit and cities work together? Federal Way Comp Plan Shoreline Comp Plan • Land use/density decisions • TOD development • ROW decisions & prioritization • Regional coordination • Competitive grant applications 5 Keeping our region a great place to live A transportation system that: • Supports our growing population • Gets people where they want to go in less time • Makes the most of our roads • Connects to fast, high-capacity transit • Saves people money • Creates more opportunities for all • Protects the environment • Adopts new technologies 6 METRO CONNECTS Vision More Service, More Choices • An expanded network of frequent service - 73% of residents would be within ½ mile of frequent service • 26 RapidRide lines • A growing network of all-day express buses • More local service – bus routes and new transportation options • Better, safer access to transit • Roadway improvements to make transit fast and reliable 7 More places in less time The travel sheds shown on the maps above include walking time, The starting point for each example is: downtown Ballard—15th Ave average amount of time waiting for the bus (assumed to be half the NW and NW Market St; Overlake Transit Center—NE 40th St and 156th frequency), travel time, and any transfer time between buses.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding from a Starter Line to a Transit Network: David Vozzolo
    Streetcars are Growing Up – Expanding from a Starter Line to a Transit Network David Vozzolo HDR, Inc., Streetcar Director Sarasota, FL Key Presentation Take-Aways • Modern Streetcar can yield mobility benefits • Lessons from review of U.S. streetcar evolution • Projects evolving into transit networks • Innovative technologies and service delivery 2013 Operating U.S. Streetcars (Modern and Vintage) Seattle Tacoma Portland Lowell Kenosha San Francisco Memphis Little Rock Dallas Tampa Galveston New Orleans Today Operating U.S. Streetcars (Modern and Vintage) Seattle Tacoma Portland Lowell Kenosha Detroit San Francisco Salt Lake City Cincinnati Kansas City Washington DC Charlotte Memphis Little Rock Tucson Dallas Atlanta Dallas Tampa Galveston New Orleans RECENT STREETCAR OPENINGS recent streetcar openings ▪ Salt Lake City Sugarhouse December 2013 ▪ Tucson Sun Link July 2014 ▪ Atlanta Streetcar December 2014 Kansas City Downtown Streetcar ▪ Dallas Oak Cliff Streetcar April 2015 ▪ Charlotte CityLYNX Gold Line July 2015 ▪ Seattle First Hill Streetcar January 2016 ▪ Washington DC February 2016 ▪ Kansas City Streetcar May 2016 ▪ Dallas Bishop Arts Extension, August 2016 ▪ Cincinnati Streetcar September 2016 ▪ Detroit Q-Line Streetcar May 2017 Washington DC Upcoming streetcar openings ▪ Milwaukee, 2018 ▪ Oklahoma City 2018 ▪ Charlotte Gold Line Phase 2 - 2020 ▪ Tacoma Extension, 2020 ▪ Santa Ana/Orange County, 2020 ▪ Tempe, 2021 ▪ Sacramento, 2022 ▪ Seattle Central City, TBD • Milwaukee, 2018 • Oklahoma City 2018 • Charlotte Gold Line Phase 2
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Service Definitions
    Definitions of Transit Services and Facilities For Urban Area Transit Strategy High-Speed Rail: Designed for very high-speed long-distance intercity trips with long station spacing and dedicated grade-separated lines. Examples include the Shinkansen in Japan, the TGV in France, and the AVE in Spain. California High-Speed Rail (HSR) is currently being planned from Sacramento to San Diego. • Vehicles are steel wheel on steel track France’s TGV electrically-powered bidirectional train sets. • Top Speed: 220 miles per hour (mph), but 150 mph maximum expected from San Diego to Escondido and 200 mph maximum from Escondido to Riverside. • Level boarding. • Passenger Capacity: Not yet determined in CA. Examples from around the world range from approximately 300 to 1,300 per train but most single Spain’s AVE level trains have about 400-500. • Operates on dedicated high speed track with no at-grade crossings. • California HSR system will be over 600 miles. California High-Speed Rail Commuter Rail: Designed for higher-speed, longer-distance regional trips with stations spacing every four to five miles on average. Examples include the San Diego COASTER, Dallas/Fort Worth Trinity Railway Express, and Southern California Metrolink. • Commuter rail lines use diesel or electric locomotives (diesel are more common and are used in Southern California). San Diego Coaster • Typical speed: 80 mph. • Typically low floor. • Supported by Park and Ride lots. • Typical passenger capacity: 130 seats per car operating with 3-8 car trains (typically no standees). • Operates on a dedicated right-of-way separate from other vehicles. • Typical length of line: 25-100 miles.
    [Show full text]