DOCSLIB.ORG

Regionálny Územný Systém Ekologickej Stability Okresu Myjava

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regionálny Územný Systém Ekologickej Stability Okresu Myjava SPRACOVANIE DOKUMENTOV REGIONÁLNYCH ÚZEMNÝCH SYSTÉMOV EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY PRE POTREBY VYTVORENIA ZÁKLADNEJ VÝCHODISKOVEJ BÁZY PRE REGULÁCIU NÁVRHU BUDOVANIA ZELENEJ INFRAŠTRUKTÚRY REGIONÁLNY ÚZEMNÝ SYSTÉM EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY OKRESU MYJAVA Rok spracovania: 2019 Realizované v rámci projektu OP KŽP z Kohézneho fondu. Generálny riaditeľ SAŽP: RNDr. Richard Müller, PhD. Riaditeľ sekcie environmentalistiky: RNDr. Tomáš Orfánus, PhD. Vedúci odboru starostlivosti o sídla, regióny a krajinu: RNDr. Oľga Slobodníková, PhD. Projektový manažér: Ing. Marta Slámková Spracovateľ dokumentácie RÚSES: ESPRIT, s.r.o., Pletiarska 2, 969 27 Banská Štiavnica Hlavný riešiteľ: Mgr. Dušan Kočický, PhD. Riešitelia: Ing. Ivana Špilárová Ing. Renáta Rákayová RNDr. Ivan Zvara RNDr. Juraj Pauk RNDr. Martin Maretta, PhD. Mgr. Ing. Boris Ivanič Ing. Radovan Pondelik Ing. Jakub Chovan František Paczelt Mgr. Blanka Lehotská, PhD. RNDr. Peter Pauditš, PhD. doc. RNDr. Eva Pauditšová, PhD. Mgr. Peter Puchala, PhD. Ing. Tamara Reháčková, PhD. RNDr. Hubert Žarnovičan, PhD. Autori FOTO: doc. RNDr. Eva Pauditšová , PhD. Ing. Tamara Reháčková, PhD. Rok spracovania: 2019 Tento text neprešiel jazykovou úpravou. SPRACOVANIE DOKUMENTOV REGIONÁLNYCH ÚZEMNÝCH SYSTÉMOV EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY PRE POTREBY VYTVÁRANIA ZÁKLADNEJ BAZY PRE REGULÁCIU NÁVRHU BUDOVANIA ZELENEJ INFRAŠTRUKTÚRY REGIONÁLNY ÚZEMNÝ SYSTÉM EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY OKRESU MYJAVA OBSAH ZOZNAM TABULIEK, GRAFOV, OBRÁZKOV A MÁP .................................................................................... 3 ZOZNAM POUŽITÝCH SKRATIEK ................................................................................................................... 6 ÚVOD ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 CIEĽ ÚLOHY ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Spôsob, obsah a rozsah spracovania úlohy ....................................................................................................... 9 VYMEDZENIE A STRUČNÁ CHARAKTERISTIKA ÚZEMIA ........................................................................... 10 I ANALYTICKÁ ČASŤ ..................................................................................................................................... 14 1 PRÍRODNÉ POMERY .............................................................................................................................. 14 1.1 Abiotické pomery ............................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.1 Geologické pomery .................................................................................................................... 16 1.1.2 Geomorfologické pomery ........................................................................................................... 19 1.1.3 Pôdne pomery ............................................................................................................................ 22 1.1.4 Hydrologické pomery a hydrogeologické pomery ...................................................................... 27 1.1.5 Klimatické pomery ...................................................................................................................... 30 1.2 BIOTICKÉ POMERY ......................................................................................................................... 33 1.2.1 Rastlinstvo .................................................................................................................................. 33 1.2.2 Živočíšstvo ................................................................................................................................. 53 2 SÚČASNÁ KRAJINNÁ ŠTRUKTÚRA ....................................................................................................... 57 2.1 Poľnohospodárska pôda .................................................................................................................... 58 2.2 Lesné pozemky ................................................................................................................................. 61 2.3 Vodné toky a plochy .......................................................................................................................... 64 2.4 Zastavané plochy a nádvoria ............................................................................................................. 65 2.4.1 Sídelné plochy ............................................................................................................................ 65 2.4.2 Priemyselné a dobývacie areály ................................................................................................. 66 2.4.3 Poľnohospodárske areály .......................................................................................................... 66 2.4.4 Dopravné zariadenia .................................................................................................................. 67 2.4.5 Zariadenia technickej infraštruktúry ............................................................................................ 67 2.4.6 Technické zariadenia ekologickej infraštruktúry ......................................................................... 68 2.5 Nelesná drevinová vegetácia ............................................................................................................ 68 2.6 Plochy verejnej a vyhradenej zelene ................................................................................................. 69 2.7 Mozaikové štruktúry ........................................................................................................................... 69 2.8 Ostatné plochy ................................................................................................................................... 70 3 ZHODNOTENIE VZŤAHU K ÚZEMNÉMU PLÁNU VEĽKÉHO ÚZEMNÉHO CELKU A DOTKNUTÝCH OBCÍ ............................................................................................................................................................ 71 4 POZITÍVNE A NEGATÍVNE PRVKY V ÚZEMÍ ......................................................................................... 79 4.1 Pozitívne prvky a javy ........................................................................................................................ 79 4.1.1 Osobitne chránené časti prírody a krajiny a časti prírody pripravované na ochranu .................. 79 4.1.2 Priemet Generelu nadregionálneho ÚSES SR ........................................................................... 90 4.1.3 Prírodné zdroje ........................................................................................................................... 92 4.1.4 Významné krajinné prvky bez legislatívnej ochrany ................................................................. 103 4.1.5 Kultúrno-historicky hodnotné formy využívania krajiny............................................................. 104 4.2 Negatívne prvky a javy .................................................................................................................... 105 4.2.1 Prírodné/prirodzené stresové faktory ....................................................................................... 105 4.2.2 Antropogénne stresové faktory ................................................................................................ 107 II. SYNTÉZOVÁ ČASŤ ................................................................................................................................... 131 5 SYNTÉZA ANALYTICKÝCH VSTUPOV A HODNOTENIA .................................................................... 131 1 SPRACOVANIE DOKUMENTOV REGIONÁLNYCH ÚZEMNÝCH SYSTÉMOV EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY PRE POTREBY VYTVÁRANIA ZÁKLADNEJ BAZY PRE REGULÁCIU NÁVRHU BUDOVANIA ZELENEJ INFRAŠTRUKTÚRY REGIONÁLNY ÚZEMNÝ SYSTÉM EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY OKRESU MYJAVA 5.1 Hodnotenie ekologickej stability....................................................................................................... 131 5.2 Plošné a priestorové usporiadanie pozitívnych a negatívnych prvkov a javov v krajine .................. 136 5.3 Ekostabilizačná významnosť, reprezentatívnosť a unikátnosť ........................................................ 142 5.4 Hodnotenie krajinnej štruktúry ......................................................................................................... 148 III NÁVRHOVÁ ČASŤ .................................................................................................................................... 162 6 NÁVRH regionálného územného systému ekologickej stability .............................................................. 162 6.1 NÁVRHY PRVKOV RÚSES ............................................................................................................ 162 6.1.1 Biocentrá .................................................................................................................................. 163 6.1.2 Biokoridory ............................................................................................................................... 163 6.1.3 Ostatné ekostabilizačné prvky.................................................................................................. 164 6.2 Návrh manažmentových opatrení pre existujúce a navrhované prvky RÚSES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Landscape Character of the Crofts Vrbovce and Chvojnica (Southern Part of White Carpathians in Slovakia) K Atarína Demková
    AUC Geographica 45 ThE LandscapE ChAracter Of ThE CrOfTs vrbOvce and Chvojnica (SouthErN ParT Of White CArpathians iN slOvakiA) k atarÍna demková charles university in prague, Faculty of science, department of physical geography and geoecology AbstrAct the landscape character has become a topical issue in many european countries as well as in the czech republic and in slovakia in the 90s. since that period a lot of scientists and experts of various disciplines have been solving problems of the landscape character, the ques- tion of its terminology and evaluation. the article is based on results of a master thesis, which deals with preventive landscape character assessment (LCA). Proposed methodology of LCA was applied in the southwestern part of Biele Karpaty Mountains (White carpathians) in Western slovakia. the model area is interesting because of the unique cultural landscape with characteristic dispersed settlement and mainly extensive farming. A part overlaps with the landscape Protected area White carpathians, whose boundary has changed during the time. consequently more valuable places have been separated from less valuable areas from the aspect of nature and landscape protection. one of the aims of the master thesis was whether it applied to the landscape character as well. Key words: landscape character, landscape character assessment, landscape unit, landscape area, White carpathians 1. Introduction appearance, which depends on the actual and long-term changes and movements in landscape such as weather Landscape character is defined as natural, cultural and seasons. and historical characteristics of place or area according in context with landscape character the term genius to the law of nature and landscape protection (§ 12 of loci is often used.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010 50
    ANNUAL REPORT 2010 50 2007 45 46.003 40 2006 35 37.594 2008 30 2009 2005 29.442 28.804 25 26.599 2010 23.956 20 15 10 5 Investments (thousand €) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 2005 15 2006 10.458 10 2007 7.545 2008 5.196 5 2.617 2009 2010 Profit (thousand €) -122 150 annual report 2010 EMA FIRTOVÁ. PADÁ DÁžď Contents Introduction from the General Director PAGE 10 Introduction from the Chairman of the Supervisory Board PAGE 11 Highlighted Events during 2010 PAGE 13 Aims and Goals for 2011 PAGE 17 shareholder structure Company Profile PAGE 19 Company Bodies PAGE 22 OTHER MUNICIPALITIES AND CITIES % Board of Directors PAGE 22 32,28 Supervisory Board PAGE 24 Company Management PAGE 26 Mission Statement and Vision PAGE 28 Main Activities PAGE 29 BVS, A. S. 8,43 % Drinking Water Production and Distribution PAGE 31 Wastewater Collection and Treatment PAGE 39 Lab Activities PAGE 45 Subsidiaries PAGE 49 THE CAPITAL OF SR BRATISLAVA 59,29 % Sector Characteristics in Brief PAGE 59 Our Customers PAGE 63 Price for Producing, Distributing and Delivering Drinking Water and for Collecting and Treating Wastewater PAGE 67 Human Resources PAGE 71 Company in the Media PAGE 77 Customer Care and Marketing Communication PAGE 83 Corporate Responsibility PAGE 87 Waterworks Museum PAGE 91 A Safe Company PAGE 95 Energy Efficiency PAGE 99 BVS and the Environment PAGE 103 water ready for use Information Technology PAGE 107 Investment Construction PAGE 111 BRATISLAVA WATER MAIN 69 % Future Infrastructure Modernisation PAGE 117 Report on Supervisory Board Activities PAGE 122
    [Show full text]
  • Potential and Central Forms of Tourism in 21 Regions of Slovakia
    Potential and Central Forms of Tourism in 21 Regions of Slovakia Importance and development priorities of regions The following previews list short characteristics of individual regions in terms of their current state, development possibilities and specific needs. The previews include a list of the most important destinations in the individual regions, the infrastructure that needs to be completed and the anticipated environmental impacts on tourism in the region. These lists are not entirely comprehensive and only include the main elements that create the character of the region as a tourist destination. 1. Bratislava Region Category / relevance Medium-term perspective International Long-term perspective International Sub-region, specific Medium-term perspective - Small Carpathians sub-region (viniculture) location - Bratislava - Senec Long-term perspective - Strip along the right bank of the Danube Type of tourism Long-term incoming foreign tourism over 50%; intensive domestic tourism as well Stay tourism – short-term in incoming as well as in domestic tourism Long–stay waterside tourism only in the summer time; one-day visits – domestic as well as foreign tourism. Transit Forms of tourism - Sightseeing tourism - Business tourism - Summer waterside stays Activities with the - Discovering cultural heritage – Business tourism - Congress/conference tourism – highest long-term Visiting cultural and sport events – Stays/recreation near water – Water sports – Boat potential sports and water tourism - Cycle tourism Position on the Slovak Number
    [Show full text]
  • Slovak Republic 2003 FOREWORD
    FOREWORD FOREWORD In May 2004, several years of efforts concentrated on meeting conditions for accession of Slovak Republic (SR) to European Union (EU) culminated. SR together with 9 other candidate countries became full members of the EU. The phase of negotiating and meeting conditions for EU accession for chapter 22 Environment within the meaning of National Accession Program - acquis communautaire was completed before the end of 2002. SR fulfilled all environmental requirements of EU, with the exception of 7 negotiated transitional periods for implementation of the most consumptive directions. By this time determinative steps for harmonisation of the Slovak environmental legislation with the one of EU had been made. In 2003 SR followed up with the integration efforts from previous years, and further effort was focused especially on introducing and implementation of the environmental legislation system into practice. From the viewpoint of the harmonisation of environmental legislation, one of the most important steps in 2003 was adoption of the Act No. 245/2003 Coll. on Integrated Prevention and Control of Environment Pollution and on Amendment of some Laws. The aim of this law is to accomplish an overall high level of environment protection by providing for a balanced integrated evaluation of all elements of the environment by the authorities of public administration while allowing facility, which can in crucial way pollution of environment cause. A significant role in this process has been entrusted to Slovak Environment Inspectorate. Consecutively to the EU General Directive on Waters, a proposal of a new Water Act was prepared in 2003, which was adopted by the National Council of Slovak Republic as Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Hospodárskeho a Sociálneho Rozvoja Obce Polianka Program Hospodárskeho a Sociálneho Rozvoja Obce Polianka
    Program hospodárskeho a sociálneho rozvoja obce Polianka Program hospodárskeho a sociálneho rozvoja obce Polianka OBSAH 1. Úvod ............................................................................................................................ 2 2. Vízia ............................................................................................................................. 4 3. Audit zdrojov ............................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Demografické charakteristiky ............................................................................. 6 3.2 Vierovyznanie ..................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Národnostné zloženie ......................................................................................... 10 3.4 Domový a bytový fond ....................................................................................... 11 3.5 Ekonomická štruktúra obyvateľstva ................................................................... 15 3.6 Vzdelanie ............................................................................................................ 20 3.7 Kultúrne zariadenia, historické a kultúrne pamiatky ........................................... 22 3.8 Inštitúcie-občianska vybavenosť ......................................................................... 22 3.9 Ostatné zariadenia, záujmová činnosť ................................................................ 23 3.10 Infraštruktúra
    [Show full text]
  • Transformačné Zmeny V Regióne Roztrateného Osídlenia Na Príklade
    Folio geographica 3 Prešov 1999 logelher with combination of exhibitional tourism (Agrokomplex exhibition) is imponam for further acceleration of tourism Olher seals in the case of financial resources have capability to follow the tcndency in tourism - orientation to fonns of fine tourism such as holidays in the country. green or blue tourism. Quality of the other kinds of environments depends especiallyon economic and poiltical situation in Slovakia. Recenzent: DOl;. RNDr Viliam Lauko. CSt. TRANSFORMAČNÉ ZMENY V REGIÓNE ROZTRATENÉHO OSÍDLENIA NA PRÍKLADE MYJA VY Viliam lA UKO Ahstract Article is cancetrating 011 amal)"sis transformating changes, the)" were going in tradition regioll of dispersed seuleme/lts - M)java ("c1earings .. - kind of dLfpersed selflemems in this region). from its beg;IIing to present time. II! analysis we mostly loaking for impact of social and ecollomic c"ange.~ to populariolI (increase ordecrease number, migrations). settlemenrs . .fettlemem IIem'ork and defilljlely transformation whole spatial system of seulemem. Key words: el'Ofulioll. transfonnation, population, serrlemems, .~pal;al system ofsettlemem l. Úvod Procc.."y transfonnácie ekonomiky a spo ločnosti sa zákonite prejavuJ u v kvalitc života obyvateľov. Tá sa odzrkadľuje v jeho pohybe, štrukturc a v konečnom dôsledku sa transfor­ mačné zmeny prejavia aj v sídlach a dokonca aj vsídlenej :;ieti. Sídla ako relatfvllc uzavreté útvary. vyvíjajúce sa v priestore prcdstavuju kroniku ľudských dejín v kultumej krajine. Zámcrom príspevku Je analýza transfonnačných zmlcn, ktoré prebehli v tradičnom regióne kopaničiarskeho osídlenia - Myjave od jeho vzniku po súčasnosť. Pri analýze si všímame predovšetkým prejav hospodárskych a spoločenských zmien na obyvateľstve, sídlach a trans­ formácii sídelnej siete. Modelove územie je vyhraničené hranicami kata'ilra pôvodnej Myjavy (tzv ...vefkej Myjavy"), ktoré mala ešte v prvej polovici ná.~ho storočia.
    [Show full text]
  • Univerzita Komenského V Bratislave Objekty Individuálnej Rekreácie Na
    Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave Prírodovedecká fakulta Katedra humánnej geografie a demogeografie Objekty individuálnej rekreácie na Slovensku so zameraním na chalupárenie v obci Brestovec Diplomová práca Bc. Denisa REPOVÁ Štúdijný odbor: 4.1.35 Geografia Vedúci diplomovej práce: Mgr. Eva Džupinová PhD. BRATISLAVA 2009 Prehlásenie Čestne prehlasujem, že som predloženú bakalársku prácu spracovala samostatne s použitím uvedenej literatúra a ďalších informa čných zdrojov. V Bratislave 20.04.2009 ..................................... podpis autora práce 2 Po ďakovanie Po ďakova ť by som sa chcela všetkým, ktorý mi akýmko ľvek spôsobom pomohli pri spracovaní tejto bakalárskej práce. Ďakujem mojej vedúcej bakalárskej práce Mgr. Eve Džupinovej PhD. za jej odborný prístup, ústretovos ť, poskytnuté rady a čas, ktorý mi venovala po čas konzultácií. Osobitné po ďakovanie patrí mojej rodine a najbližším. 3 ABSTRAKT Denisa Repová: Objekty individuálnej rekreácie na Slovensku so zameraním na chalupárenie v obci Brestovec Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Prírodovedecká fakulta, Katedra humánnej geografie a demografie Diplomová práca, 110 strán, 18 grafických príloh, 2009 Význam vidieka ako rekrea čného priestoru narástol najmä za posledné desa ťro čia. Je to spôsobené procesom urbanizácie, ktorý prispieva k nárastu podielu mestského obyvate ľstva a zhoršovaniu úrovne životného prostredia v mestách (zne čistené ovzdušie, nadmerný hluk ap.) Vo vidieckom prostredí sa nachádza ve ľký po čet objektov individuálnej rekreácie – chaty, chalupy, rekrea čné domy. Primárnym cie ľom vlastníctva a užívania objektov individuálnej rekreácie je regenerácia fyzických a psychických síl vo vhodnejšom prostredí. Objekty individuálnej rekreácie tvoria významný potenciál pre cestovný ruch. Medzi oblasti s priaznivou sídelnou štruktúrou a bytovým fondom pre pobyt na vidieku zara ďujeme rozptýlené osídlenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Are the Czech Or Slovak Regions “Closer to Europe”? Pro-Europeanness from a Subnational Perspective Martin Plešivčák*
    Original Article 183 Are the Czech or Slovak regions “closer to Europe”? Pro-Europeanness from a subnational perspective Martin Plešivčák* Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Economic and Social Geography, Demography and Territorial Development, Slovakia * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Based on the 2003–2019 electoral data, this article evaluates the level of pro-Europeanness in Czechia and Slovakia at the regional and sub-regional levels during and after their EU accession period. The TOPSIS multi-criteria evaluation method and cluster analysis were used to quantify the pro-European levels and to create the subsequent categories of territorial units. The results show sup- port for the ideas of European integration primarily in large urban regions (Prague, Brno, Bratislava, Košice), territorial units with a higher concentration of ethnic minorities, larger scale agricultural activities (southwestern Slovakia), and a high degree of religiosity (northeastern Slovakia). The low level of pro-Europeanness was predominant in the less developed north-western Czechia and parts of Moravia. In Slovakia, the Eurosceptic regions were mostly located in the northwest, where the values of statism, egalitarianism and nationalism have a strong tradition. This approach can be used to identify areas of weak support for the EU project at a spatially disaggregated level in other EU countries. KEYWORDS Pro-Europeanness; TOPSIS method; EU referendum; European Parliament elections; subnational level; Czechia; Slovakia Received: 4 October 2019 Accepted: 16 July 2020 Published online: 30 September 2020 Plešivčák, M. (2020): Are the Czech or Slovak regions “closer to Europe”? Pro-Europeanness from a subnational perspective. AUC Geographica 55(2), 183–199 https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2020.13 © 2020 The Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Recreation and Landscape Protection – with Man Hand in Hand
    Department of Landscape Management FFWT Mendel University in Brno Public recreation and landscape protection – with man hand in hand... Conference proceeding 1st – 3rd May 2013 Brno Under the auspices of Petr Horáček, the Dean of the FFWT Mendel University in Brno, of Tomáš Chalupa, the Minister of the Environment, of Michal Hašek, the Governor of the South Moravia Region, and of Roman Onderka, the Mayor of the City of Brno. in cooperation with the Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Palacký University Olomouc, AOPK ČR (Agency for Nature Conservation and Landscape Protection of the Czech Republic) – Administration of the Moravian Karst Protected Landscape Area, Czech Society of Landscape Engineers and the Czech Association for Landscape Ecology with the financial support of the City of Brno and FS Bohemia Ltd., The conference is included in the Continuing Professional Education in Czech Chamber of Architects and is rated with 4 credit points. Editors of the proceeding: Ing. Jitka Fialová, MSc., Ph.D.; Ing. Hana Kubíčková ISBN 978-80-7375-746-5 (Print) ISSN 2336-6311 (Print) ISSN 2336-632X (On-line) Contents AESTHETIC VALUE OF NATURE - PLEASURE OR APPRECIATION? Kateřina Pařízková, Karel Stibral.....................................................................................................7 BRIDGES AND FOOTBRIDGES IN THE LANDSCAPE ENVIRONMENT FOR RECREATIONAL AND TOURIST USE Pavla Kotásková, Petr Hrůza..........................................................................................................14 CLIMATIC MONITORING
    [Show full text]
  • Kopanice Region Weilerregion Catalogue of the Craftsmen Katalog Der Handwerker V V ''- Obsah
    Kopanice region Weilerregion Catalogue of the craftsmen Katalog der Handwerker v V ''- Obsah Slovo na úvod ............................................... 2 Introduction to catalogue of tme craftsmen Vorwortzum Katalóg der Handwerker Petra Benjanová........................................... 6 Marián B o th ...................................................8 Drevodekor.................................................. 10 Janka Dugová...............................................12 Veronika Durcová........................................15 Marcela Holotová........................................17 Adrián Hrubý...............................................20 Pavol Hvoždála ...........................................23 Ján Jánoš......................................................25 Martin Kozáček...........................................28 Jaroslav Kubina...........................................31 Slovo na úvod Ivana Marková.............................................33 Remeslá tak, ako ich v odkaze ľudovej kultúry dnes poznáme, vznikali spoločenskou delbou Miroslav Medňanský.................................. 36 práce oddelením od poľnohospodárstva. Pri postupnom osídľovaní územia Slovenska Márie Michalicová........................................38 obyvateľstvom západnej Európy boli strediskami remesiel mestá, predtým služobníčke osady. Až v Jaroslav Obuch ...........................................39 19. storočí prenikali remeslá vo väčšom rozsahu do vidieckeho prostredia. Medzi tie najrozšírenejšie Jaroslava Rehorčík......................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Visit to Kopaničiarský Region
    GRUNDTVIG LEARNING PARTNERSHIP SLOVAK INTERNATIONAL VISIT 29/04 – 01/05/2013 Reviving rural areas REPORT FROM THE VISIT Connection of the organic agriculture and agro-tourism Visit dates and participants The meeting took place from 29 th April till 1 st May 2013 in Kopani čiarský region. This meeting was attended by 12 participants from the Czech Republic. The Dutch and Polish partners didn´t have their representations. The project group of the hosting country consisted of people from the hosting organisation AGROEDUKA Tren čín and its partner organisations civic association Penzióny pod Bradlom and LAG Kopani čiarsky región . Programme Monday 29. 4. 2013 Podkylava, Agropenzión Adam Region of plum solitary houses – workshop in agro-guesthouse (plums as a traditional product from the region, food from plums, introduction of the region) Ecoagrotourism – its present and its future Tuersday 30. 4. 2013 Košariská, Brezová pod Bradlom Workshop in pension U Juhása, Košariská : - Traditional methods in the region – homemade pig-slaughtering - Presentation of the region and the typical countryside (undulating landscape with characteristic hills) - Ekotrend Myjava – presentation of the producer (grower and producer of ecological plants) - Ecological breeding of beef cattle and ecological growing of plants (Pod Bradlom, Dlhý Vršek ) Wednesday 1. 5. 2013 Agropenzión Adam Podkylava and farm Charolais Podkylava Opening of the grazing season on a farm Charolais in the village Podkylava - introduction of the farm, which is managed under the organic farming and attendance on the celebration as a demonstration of the preserving folk traditions. The program was held at two main locations – Agropenzion Adam Podkylava and Penzion U Juhása Košariská .
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Action Plan in the Morava River Basin
    Flood Action Plan in the Morava River Basin The ICPDR Flood Action Programme Version: FINAL Date: November 2009 Prepared by: Austria Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Freiland Umweltconsulting ZT GmbH REVITAL Ziviltechniker GmbH Czech Republic Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Ministry of Environment Morava River Board, s.e. Slovak Republic Ministry of Environment Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute Slovak Water Management Enterprise, s.e. Water Research Institute Flood Action Plan in the Morava River Basin October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 3 2. CHARACTERISATION OF CURRENT SITUATION......................................... 4 2.1 Review and Assessment of Current Situation................................................... 4 2.1.1 Natural conditions .................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Conditions of flood forecasting and warning............................................ 7 2.1.3 Recent awareness of flooding ................................................................... 9 2.1.4 Institutional and legal framework.............................................................. 10 2.2 Review and assessment of the predictable long term developments ............... 12 3. TARGET SETTINGS ............................................................................................. 13 3.1 Regulation of land use and spatial planning ...................................................
    [Show full text]