CHAPTER 3 a Revision of the Afrotropical Species of Hersiliola
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Systematics of the Hersiliidae (Araneae) of the Afrotropical Region
University of Pretoria etd – Foord, S H (2005) Systematics of the Hersiliidae (Araneae) of the Afrotropical Region by Stefan Hendrik Foord Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD (Zoology) In the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria January 2005 1 University of Pretoria etd – Foord, S H (2005) Table of Contents Content Page DISCLAIMER iii SUMMARY/OPSOMMING iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v CHAPTER ONE A Cladistic Analysis of the Family Hersiliidae 6 (Arachnida, Araneae) of the Afrotropical Region CHAPTER TWO A Revision of the Afrotropical species of Hersilia 50 Audouin (Araneae: Hersiliidae) CHAPTER THREE A Revision of the Afrotropical Species of Hersiliola 168 Thorell and Tama Simon with Description of a New Genus Tyrotama (Araneae: Hersiliidae) CHAPTER FOUR The First Records of Murricia Simon from the 208 Afrotropical Region (Araneae: Hersiliidae) CHAPTER FIVE The First Records of Neotama Baehr & Baehr from the 220 Afrotropical Region and Description of a New Genus, Prima (Araneae: Hersiliidae) 2 University of Pretoria etd – Foord, S H (2005) Disclaimer This PhD thesis comprises a number of chapters prepared for submission to a range of journals. Consequently, chapter formats and contents contain some inconsistencies and overlap in order to secure publishable entities. 3 University of Pretoria etd – Foord, S H (2005) Acknowledgments I would like to thank Annette van den Berg, Charnie Craemer, Lindie Steynberg, and Elizabeth Kassimatis for providing technical as well as theoretical assistance. The various museum curators I borrowed material from are thanked, in particular, Peter Jäger and Rudi Jocqué, whom responded almost immediately to any request I made. -
SA Spider Checklist
REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region. -
Saudis Seeking to Undermine Nuclear Deal Benefits: Larijani
Zarif: Shia and South Pars daily output FIBA Asia U18 Iran’s first 21112Sunni are both victims 4 to rise to 540mcm Championship: Iran virtual art gallery NATION of terrorism ECONOMY by Mar. 2017 SPORTS beaten by Japan ART& CULTURE launched WWW.TEHRANTIMES.COM I N T E R N A T I O N A L D A I L Y Iran to protest IAEA over leak of confidential documents 2 12 Pages Price 10,000 Rials 38th year No.12607 Monday JULY 25, 2016 Mordad 4, 1395 Shawwal 20, 1437 Banking Saudis seeking to undermine reform bills in Majlis by nuclear deal benefits: Larijani mid-August: Majlis speaker says what Saudis are doing is ‘open hostility’ CBI governor POLITICAL TEHRAN — Iranian Par- tain Western countries are taking “obstructive” sanctions on Iran. not be able to use the post-nuclear deal condi- deskliament Speaker Ali Larijani measures to prevent Iran from benefiting the “Evils of Saudis and certain Western coun- tions,” Larijani told a gathering in Qom, the city ECONOMY TEHRAN - Two pro- desk said on Saturday that Saudi Arabia and cer- advantages of the nuclear deal which removes tries have created obstacles so that Iran would which he represents in the Majlis. 2 posed bills aiming at banking system reform have been pre- pared and will be sent to the parliament (Majlis) by the end of the current Iranian calendar month of Mordad (August 21), First IRNA quoted Central Bank Governor Valiollah Seif as saying on Sunday. Kiarostami “The two bills have been drafted in line with the country’s financial and prize awarded monetary reform plan and after being approved by the government they will to “Fish and be presented to Majlis,” he added. -
CHAPTER ONE a Cladistic Analysis of the Family
University of Pretoria etd – Foord, S H (2005) CHAPTER ONE A Cladistic Analysis of the Family Hersiliidae (Arachnida, Araneae) of the Afrotropical Region Abstract The family Hersiliidae consists of six genera in the Afrotropical region, two of these taxa are newly discovered viz. Tyrotama gen. nov. and Prima gen. nov. Murricia Simon and Neotama Baehr & Baehr are newly recorded for the region. Of the three original genera, Tama, Hersilia, and Hersiliola, the latter two remain. A cladistic analysis based on 48 characters and 22 species, which included nine species that are not Afrotropical, inferred the following phylogeny: ((Hersiliola Tyrotama) (Neotama (Prima (Murricia Hersilia)))). Morphological data supports the monophyly of Tyrotama and the phylogeny suggests that the genus is closely related to Hersiliola. The new genus Prima is weakly supported as the sister taxon of Neotama. Support for the genus Hersilia is weak and synapomorphies that unite six identified species groups within the genus are much more consistent than those that unite Hersilia. However, the genus Hersilia is retained until a comprehensive generic level analysis for the world is conducted. A key to the genera of the Afrotropical Region is provided. Key words: Hersiliidae, phylogeny, Afrotropical Region 6 University of Pretoria etd – Foord, S H (2005) Introduction The Hersiliidae is a small spider family with 141 species and 10 genera excluding results from this study (Platnick 2004; Rheims & Brescovit 2004). The group is characterized by conspicuously long posterior lateral spinnerets, elongated legs and is limited to the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. All hersiliids are arboreal except for the representatives of Hersiliola Thorell, 1870 and Tama Simon, 1882. -
IBEITR.ARANEOL.,L(2004)
I BEITR.ARANEOL.,l(2004) I PART 111 a (TEil 111 a) - Descriptions of selected taxa THE FOSSil MYGAlOMORPH SPIDERS (ARANEAE) IN BAl TIC AND DOMINICAN AMBER AND ABOUT EXTANT MEMBERS OF THE FAMllY MICROMYGALIDAE J. WUNDERLICH, 75334 Straubenhardt, Germany. Abstract: The fossil mygalomorph spiders (Araneae: Mygalomorpha) in Baltic and Do- minican amber are listed, a key to the taxa is given. Two species of the genus Ummidia THORELL 1875 (Ctenizidae: Pachylomerinae) in Baltic amber are redescribed, Clos- thes priscus MENGE 1869 (Dipluridae) from Baltic amber is revised, two gen. indet. (Dipluridae) fram Baltic amber are reported. The first fossil member of the family Micro- stigmatidae: Parvomygale n. gen., Parvomygale distineta n. sp. (Parvomygalinae n. subfarn.) in Dominican amber is described. - The taxon Micramygalinae PLATNICK & FORSTER 1982 is raised to family rank, revised diagnoses of the families Micromyga- lidae (no fossil record) and Micrastigmatidae are given. Material: CJW = collection J. WUNDERLICH, GPIUH = Geological and Palaeontologi- cal Institute of the University Hamburg, IMGPUG = Institute and Museum for Geology and Paleontology of the Georg-August-University Goettingen in Germany. 595 ---~-~-~~~--~~--~-'----------~--------~-~~~=-~~--.., INTRODUCTION The first fossil member of the suborder Mygalomorpha (= Orthognatha) in Baltic amber has been described by MENGE 1869 as Glostes priscus (figs. 1-2; comp. the book of WUNDERLICH (1986: Fig. 291)). This spider is a member of the family Dipluridae (Funnelweb Mygalomorphs) and is redescribed in this paper; only juveniles are known. Two further species of Mygalomorpha are described from this kind of amber, these are members of the family Ctenizidae (Trapdoor spiders). - Fossil members of the Mygalo- morphae in Dominican amber were described by WUNDERLICH (1988). -
Arachnides 88
ARACHNIDES BULLETIN DE TERRARIOPHILIE ET DE RECHERCHES DE L’A.P.C.I. (Association Pour la Connaissance des Invertébrés) 88 2019 Arachnides, 2019, 88 NOUVEAUX TAXA DE SCORPIONS POUR 2018 G. DUPRE Nouveaux genres et nouvelles espèces. BOTHRIURIDAE (5 espèces nouvelles) Brachistosternus gayi Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Chili) Brachistosternus philippii Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Chili) Brachistosternus misti Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Pérou) Brachistosternus contisuyu Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Pérou) Brachistosternus anandrovestigia Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Pérou) BUTHIDAE (2 genres nouveaux, 41 espèces nouvelles) Anomalobuthus krivotchatskyi Teruel, Kovarik & Fet, 2018 (Ouzbékistan, Kazakhstan) Anomalobuthus lowei Teruel, Kovarik & Fet, 2018 (Kazakhstan) Anomalobuthus pavlovskyi Teruel, Kovarik & Fet, 2018 (Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan) Ananteris kalina Ythier, 2018b (Guyane) Barbaracurus Kovarik, Lowe & St'ahlavsky, 2018a Barbaracurus winklerorum Kovarik, Lowe & St'ahlavsky, 2018a (Oman) Barbaracurus yemenensis Kovarik, Lowe & St'ahlavsky, 2018a (Yémen) Butheolus harrisoni Lowe, 2018 (Oman) Buthus boussaadi Lourenço, Chichi & Sadine, 2018 (Algérie) Compsobuthus air Lourenço & Rossi, 2018 (Niger) Compsobuthus maidensis Kovarik, 2018b (Somaliland) Gint childsi Kovarik, 2018c (Kénya) Gint amoudensis Kovarik, Lowe, Just, Awale, Elmi & St'ahlavsky, 2018 (Somaliland) Gint gubanensis Kovarik, Lowe, Just, Awale, Elmi & St'ahlavsky, -
Fossils – Adriano Kury’S Harvestman Overviews and the Third Edition of the Manual of Acarology for Mites
A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie 1 A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Christian Bartel, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2016. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch, version 17.5, accessed on {date of access}. Last updated: 09.08.2016 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current World Spider Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the fossil record of spiders – and other arachnids – and numerous new taxa have been described. For an overview see Dunlop & Penney (2012). Spiders remain the single largest fossil group, but our aim here is to offer a summary list of all fossil Chelicerata in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list for Araneae follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the previous Platnick Catalog. -
23. Arthropods Inhabiting Rodent Burrows In. the Karakum Desert
23. Arthropods Inhabiting Rodent Burrows in. the Karakum Desert VICTOR A. KRIVOKHATSKY Abstract Communities of arthropods were studied in the Repetek Reserve (Karakum Desert) in burrows of desert rodents Rhombomys opimus, Spermophilopsis leptodactylm, Meriones meridianus, and M. libycus. These burrows differ in complexity and structure of arthropod communities. More than 500 species of burrow-inhabiting arthropods possessing various degrees of ecological specialization were discovered, from obligate bothrobionts to species only accidentally found in burrows. Taxonomic composition of the burrow arthropod communities is discussed as well as their trophic, temporal, and spatial structure. Introduction Animal burrows and holes contain peculiar ecosystems. In addition to their hosts, these burrows are often inhabited by many other animal species, predominantly arthropods, which are usually called "bothrobionts" or "nidicoles." Here, we refer to a community of an animal burrow as a "heterotrophic burrow consortium." Its core includes the host(s) of the burrow and its nonliving part, the burrow itself. Other animals in this consortium have ecological connections of various degree with its core. The term "bothrobiont," currently used in the morphological-ecological classifications of ecosystems, designates any animal that lives in the holes or burrows, digs its own burrow, and has morphological and ecological adaptations to these conditions. We use the following classification system for animals found in burrows: (1) bothrobionts - species with permanent (obligatory) burrow connections; (2) bothrophiles - species with a strong burrow connection; (3) bothroxenes - species with no obligatory connections; and (4) species alien to the burrow, and only accidentally found there. Studies of burrow ecosystems started in Europe early in this century (Falcoz 1915). -
Australian Hersiliidae, Baehr and Baehr, 1987
Invertebr. Taxon., 1987, 1, 35 1-437 The Australian Hersiliidae (Arachnida :Araneae): Taxonomy, Phylogeny, Zoogeography Barbara Baehr and Martin Baehr Zoologische Staatssammlung Munchen, Munchhausenstr. 21, D-8000 Munchen 60, West Germany. Abstract The Australian species of the spider family Hersiliidae are revised and compared in a key. Hersilia australiensis, sp. nov., is newly described, the first record of the genus Hersilia from Australia. For all other Australian species a new genus, Tamopsis, is erected and the species formerly included in the genus Tama Simon are transferred to it. Of the species so far recorded from Australia, only T. eucalypti (Rainbow) and T. fickerti (L. Koch) are recognised; Tama novaehollandiae (L. Koch) and Tama brachyura Simon are regarded as doubtful species, because the types are either juveniles or lost and the species are not recognisable from descriptions. For T. eucalypti (Rainbow) a lectotype and a paralectotype are designated; for T. fickerti (L. Koch) a neotype is designated from the material at hand. The following new species of Tamopsis are described: T. platycephala, sp. nov.; T. amplithorax, sp. nov.; T. brachycauda, sp. nov.; T. tweedensis, sp. nov.; T. brisbanensis, sp. nov.; T. daviesi, sp. nov.; T. kochi, sp. nov.; T. centralis, sp. nov.; T. reevesbyana, sp. nov.; T. grayi, sp. nov.; T. darlingtoniana, sp. nov.; T. queenslandica, sp. nov.; T. raveni, sp. nov.; T. cooloolensis, sp. nov.; T. brevipes, sp. nov.; T. arnhemensis, sp. nov.; T. circumvidens, sp. nov.; T. tropica, sp. nov.; T. trionyx, sp. nov.; T. pseudocircumvidens, sp. nov.; T. leichhardtiana, sp. nov.; T. rossi, sp. nov.; T. perthensis, sp. -
The History of Cytogenetic Investigations of Spiders in Turkey
International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology ISSN: 2639-216X MEDWIN PUBLISHERS Committed to Create Value for Researchers The History of Cytogenetic Investigations of Spiders in Turkey Kumbicak Z* Review Article Volume 3 Issue 4 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Turkey *Corresponding author: Received Date: Published Date: June 12, 2020 Zubeyde Kumbicak, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, July 06, 2020 Faculty of Art and Science, Nevsehir Hacı Bektas Veli University, 50300, Nevşehir, Turkey, DOI: 10.23880/izab-16000232 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Spiders are an ancient group of animals that probably originated in the Devonian period about 400 million years ago. Over time, they have adapted to major changes in climate and fauna and have become widespread on all continents, living in almost any terrestrial habitat. It is known that approximately 50000 spider species belonging to 120 families worldwide, today. and this number increases almost every day due to new records are being given from many countries. Despite the high diversity of species, the number of cytogenetic studies on spiders is very scarce. Upto now, 868 species belonging to the 74 families were investigated by cytogenetically. Although more than a thousand species of spiders in Turkey, the Cytogenetic studies are insufficient. Thus, spiders are the most richest group of arachnids among arthropods. In this study cytogenetic studies on Keywords:spiders in Turkey were reviewed. Convergent Evolution; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Typhoid; HIV Abbreviations: IntroductionSCS: Sex Chromosome System. pedipalpus, which has a bulging structure in male spiders, is an important structure in the transfer of sperm to the female. -
A Summary List of Fossil Spiders and Their Relatives Compiled By
A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie 1 A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Christian Bartel, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2017. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch, version 18.0, accessed on {date of access}. Last updated: 04.01.2017 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current World Spider Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the fossil record of spiders – and other arachnids – and numerous new taxa have been described. For an overview see Dunlop & Penney (2012). Spiders remain the single largest fossil group, but our aim here is to offer a summary list of all fossil Chelicerata in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list for Araneae follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the previous Platnick Catalog. -
A DNA Barcode-Assisted Annotated Checklist of the Spider (Arachnida, Araneae) Communities Associated to White Oak Woodlands in Spanish National Parks
Biodiversity Data Journal 6: e29443 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e29443 Taxonomic Paper A DNA barcode-assisted annotated checklist of the spider (Arachnida, Araneae) communities associated to white oak woodlands in Spanish National Parks Luís C Crespo‡,§, Marc Domènech‡, Alba Enguídanos‡, Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte‡,§,|, Pedro Cardoso §, Jordi Moya-Laraño¶, Cristina Frías-López#, Nuria Macías-Hernández§,¤, Eva De Mas ¶, Paola Mazzuca‡‡, Elisa Mora , Vera Opatova‡,«, Enric Planas ‡, Carles Ribera‡, Marcos Roca-Cusachs», Dolores Ruiz¶,˄ ‡Pedro Sousa , Vanina Tonzo , Miquel A. Arnedo‡ ‡ Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences & Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, E-08028, Barcelona, Spain § Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki; PO Box 17, 00014, Helsinki, Finland | cE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, University of the Azores; Rua Capitão João d´Ávila, Pico da Urze, 9700-042 , Angra do Heroísmo, Terceira, Azores, Portugal ¶ Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Estación Experimenta de Zonas Áridas (EEZA, CSIC); Carretera de Sacramento, s/n. La Cañada de San Urbano 04120, Almeria, Spain # Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics, & Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, E-08028, Barcelona, Spain ¤ Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiologíıa, C/Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez 3, La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain « Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, Davis, United States of America » Laboratory of Systematic Entomology in the Department of Applied Biology of Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea, South ˄ CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vila do Conde, Portugal Corresponding author: Miquel A.